KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD 2014 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY KENTUCKY EXPOSITION CENTER KENTUCKY INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTER

Similar documents
Gateway Center, Collinsville, Illinois Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis

2017 Economic Significance to Indiana of CIB-Facilitated Conventions, Games, & Events

Rhode Island Convention Center, Dunkin Donuts Center & the Veterans Memorial Auditorium April 22, 2015

Economic Impact of THE PLAYERS Championship Golf Tournament at Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, March Tom Stevens, Alan Hodges and David Mulkey

The Economic Impact of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2009

Scottsdale Tourism Study - Visitor Statistics

Economic Impact Analysis for Proposed Multi Purpose Event Facility at the Washington County Fair Complex

New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center

The Local Economic Impact of Short Term Rentals in Galveston, Texas

The Economic Impact of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2016

FY2015 VISIT MISSISSIPPI GLOSSARY

The Economic Impact Of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2015

Economic Impact Study Report. Subject: Proposed Hopkinsville, KY, Sports Center. Prepared by: Pinnacle Indoor Sports. Date: October 2016

Conventions, Sports & Leisure International 520 Nicollet Mall, Suite 520 Minneapolis, Minnesota Telephone Facsimile

Scottsdale Tourism Study - Visitor Statistics

Tourism s Economics Impact on Somerset County. May 2018

Tourism s Economics Impact on the Meadowlands Liberty Region. May 2018

Economic Impact of THE PLAYERS Championship Golf Tournament at Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, May Tom Stevens, Alan Hodges and David Mulkey

The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals In the State of Texas 2018 Update

Economic Impact of the Hotel Roanoke and Conference Center. Prepared by the

Greater Des Moines Water Trails & Greenways Economic Impact Study

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRAVEL ON GEORGIA 2004 PROFILE

The Economic and Fiscal Impact of Events at the Kentucky Horse Park Fiscal Year 2007

Lake Havasu City Travel Impacts, p

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2017

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2016

The Economic Capture of the Downtown Phoenix Redevelopment Area. Prepared for:

Georgia World Congress Center Authority Economic Impact Analysis FY 2018

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Thousand Islands Focus

ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

Welcome To Rockville Intercept Survey Report. April 26 th -27 th, 2014

Tulip Time 2015: Economic Impact and Attendee Profile

1. Preface 2. Qualifications 3. Ballpark Benefits 4. Ancillary Development Benefits 5. Summary

The Local Economic Impact of Short Term Rentals in Monterey County

The Economic Impact of the 2012 Alberta Cross Country Ski World Cup

Economic Significance of Meetings to the US Economy. Events Industry Council

The Economic Impact of the 2014 Alberta Winter Games

Economic Impact of The Bradley Center. Prepared by: Bret J. Mayborne Economic Research Director Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

A look at the economic benefit of a conference center to the City of Ithaca. The Power of Travel

Volume I Issue VII - Revised. The Impact of LVCVA/LVE- Sponsored Special Events on the Southern Nevada Economy

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM IN VERMONT: SPRING & SUMMER 2001

The University of Georgia

ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS UPDATE, ORO MEDONTE, ONTARIO PREPARED FOR BURL S CREEK EVENT GROUND INC.

2016 VALERO ALAMO BOWL ECONOMIC & FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (A PRIMARY STUDY)

Economic Impact of the Arroyo Seco Music and Arts Festival on the City of Pasadena

Charlotte County SOUTHWEST FLORIDA Economic Development Office

Economic Impact Generated by Visitor Expenditures in 2017 Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland Global Center for Health Innovation

MEMPHIS IN MAY INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL

Economic Impact Analysis of Fort Steele National Heritage Town. Final Report. By:

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2012

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH

Rebekka Dudensing, Texas AgriLife Extension Service I January Economic Impact of the Brazos

Introduction...1. Project Overview.2. Cache la Poudre River NHA Economic Impact 4. Conclusion..10. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms 11

Another Record Setting Year for Indiana Tourism. The 2017 Contribution of Travel & Tourism to the Indiana Economy

The Economic Impact of Northern Virginia Transportation Authority Capital Investment

The Economic Impact of the UK Exhibitions Industry - February A FaceTime report by Oxford Economics

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE HUSKY ATHLETIC PROGRAM ON THE WASHINGTON ECONOMY

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Morgan County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Economic & Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Proposed Hamilton Fields Sports Park. Prepared for the City of Novato: April 11, 2016

Wisconsin Center District

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of St. Elizabeth Healthcare System (Hospitals and Physician Offices)

The Economic Impact of the Milwaukee Brewers

The Economic Impact of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Athletic Department on the State of Tennessee: Academic Year

2015 A Record Year for Indiana Tourism. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

The 2014 Gay Games: An Economic Impact Study

Economic benefits of fiscal year 2002 tourism employment and payroll data for Mississippi

San Francisco Multi-Purpose Venue Project. Fiscal Impact Analysis: Revenues. Draft Report. Prepared for: The City and County of San Francisco

The Economic Impact of Alberta s Winter Olympic Legacy Events

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Tippecanoe County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

The Economic Value of Arts, Cultural, and Heritage Organizations to the Central Iowa Economy

The Economic Impact of the UK Exhibitions Industry

APPENDIX K ORANGE COUNTY IDA KPMG STUDY ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE OF REAL PROPERTY, PROPERTY VALUE IMPACT ANALYSIS

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Long Island Focus

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York

SUBJECT: AUDIT OF TEAM SAN JOSE'S PERFORMANCE

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH

Economic Impact of the US Army Heritage and Education Center

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York

Impacts of the Commercial Gaming Industry in Indiana. November 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York

CITY OF WELLAND POLICY

The Ward Museum Economic Impact Study. Conducted by:

TRAVEL (adopted 3/10/08)

2015 Ford World Men s Curling Championships Halifax, Nova Scotia

The Economic Impact of Motorcoach Tourism in Pigeon Forge Tennessee. Prepared by GuerrillaEconomics, LLC

Impact Analysis of the Greensboro Coliseum Complex for the 2012 Operating Year

The 2015 Economic Impact Study of the Recreation Vehicle Industry

UFC EVENT IMPACTS: ECONOMIC STUDY FOR NEW YORK STATE UPSTATE (BUFFALO)( ) AND DOWNSTATE (NYC) NOVEMBER 10, 2008

NEVADA TAX REVENUE COMPARED TO THE UNITED STATES

Economic Impacts Associated with Improvements to Storm Lake

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York

DETROIT S WORKFORCE ANALYSIS

March 26, 2015 ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, ORO MEDONTE, ONTARIO PREPARED FOR BURL S CREEK EVENT GROUND INC.

Understanding the Visitor to Kansas City. August 2013

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA ATHLETICS DEPARTMENT, FISCAL YEAR

RESEARCH BRIEF. No. 3 April The Economic Contributions of Tourism in Utah A Regional Comparison

Jacksonville Jazz Festival Intercept Survey Report. May 22 nd -25 th, 2014

The American Beverage Licensees Economic Impact Study. Methodology and Documentation Prepared for: American Beverage Licensees

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York

Transcription:

KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD 2014 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY KENTUCKY EXPOSITION CENTER KENTUCKY INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTER

KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD EVENTS ECONOMIC IMPACT - 2014 Prepared for: Kentucky State Fair Board Prepared by January 2015 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A detailed examination of the expenditure and fiscal impacts generated by the 2014 events at the Kentucky Exposition Center (KEC) and the Kentucky International Convention Center (KICC) has been conducted for the Kentucky State Fair Board. The major findings of the research follow: The events at the two facilities contributed over $482.3 million to Kentucky s economy in 2014 compared to $435 million in 2005. Direct expenditures of nonresident attendees accounted for $163.1 million of this total. The direct economic contribution by exhibitors added $47.9 million to the total. Total sales at KEC/KICC provided $44.8 million to the total. The facilities generated over $36.4 million in tax revenues to government $28.9 million to the Kentucky state government and $7.5 million locally to Jefferson County. The events at the facilities generated jobs that provided nearly $134.3 million in new payroll to Kentucky workers. A total of 6,630 jobs were generated by the expenditures resulting from the events held at KEC/KICC. Expenditures of attendees by category showed that food and beverage, lodging, and shopping accounted for over eight out of every ten dollars spent in the Louisville Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The top events based on nonresident expenditures are: National Farm Machinery Show & Tractor Pull, Mid-America Truck Show, National Street Rod Association, North American International Livestock Expo, FFA National Convention, and Kentucky State Fair. 2

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this year-long study is to quantify the economic and fiscal impact of Kentucky State Fair Board activities in 2014. The research includes all of the events held at the Kentucky Exposition Center (KEC) and the Kentucky International Convention Center (KICC) from January 2014 through December 2014. Economic benefits begin when a traveler to the facilities, either a Louisville Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) nonresident or an out-of-state visitor, spends money in Kentucky. The typical purchases of visitors include goods and services such as lodging, food and beverages, gasoline, souvenirs, admission fees, entertainment, or other retail goods. This initial round of spending is referred to as the direct expenditures. These direct expenditures create a ripple-like effect through the economy. The businesses receiving these dollars use them to pay wages and salaries, to purchases goods and services for the businesses, and to pay taxes. The individuals and businesses receiving these monies, in turn, spend them on goods, services, and taxes. This process is repeated through several rounds of spending until the impact becomes insignificantly small. The combined impact of these several rounds of spending is referred to as the multiplier effect. The total economic and fiscal impact of Kentucky State Fair Board tourism is the combination of the direct expenditures and the multiplier effect expressed in terms of spending, jobs, wages, and taxes. It is important to note that tourism impacts all sectors of the local economy. The research findings presented in this report show the importance of tourism to the local economy in 2014. This is accomplished through the use of the Certec approach designed for estimating tourism impacts at the state and local levels, in conjunction with an input-output model designed for estimating the indirect and induced effects of tourist spending. The procedures used are explained in detail in Appendix A. 3

Table 1 KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD EVENTS ECONOMIC IMPACT 2014 2014 Total Expenditures $482,314,432 Attendees Expenditures (Direct) $163,158,996 Exhibitor Expenditures (Direct) $ 47,897,653 Sales at KEC/KICC $ 44,805,768 Total New Payroll Generated $134,264,485 Total Taxes $ 36,415,651 Kentucky State Taxes $ 28,868,144 Local Taxes, Jefferson County $ 7,547,507 Total Employment Generated 6,630 4

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM Expenditures The Kentucky State Fair Board events made a total contribution to Kentucky's economy of $482.3 million in 2014 (Table 1) compared to the estimate of $435 million for the previous study for 2005. The direct purchases made by non-resident attendees while in Kentucky accounted for $163.1 million of this total. The direct economic contribution by exhibitors added $47.9 million to the total. Total sales at KEC/KICC contributed $44.8 million to the total. This represents an annual increase in spending of 1.2 percent over 2005 levels. Lodging guests are the primary drivers of economic impact since they avail themselves of a wider variety of goods and services during their stay in the community. As a group they spend more at restaurants, gas stations, shopping centers and specialty stores, in addition to their lodging purchases. Non-resident attendees in 2014 generated 586,268 room-nights locally. Exhibitors and organizers contributed an additional 215,750 room-nights locally. These overnight visitors made substantial contributions to the direct economic impact presented above. The difference between the total economic impact and the purchases of travelers was a result of the multiplier effect, i.e. the indirect expenditures. This was triggered by the initial infusion of dollars in the economy. These direct expenditures had a ripple-like quality as they passed from one layer of the economy to the next. The magnitude of these economic benefits diminished during each round of re-spending for goods and services until only an insignificantly small sum was left. The sum of these expenditures for the several rounds of re-spending of the initial dollars was the total multiplier effect of $226.4 million. 5

The attendee expenditure data were further classified by type of purchase. The distribution of these expenditures is provided in Chart 1. Spending on food and beverage accounted for nearly 35 percent of these $163.1 million in direct purchases. Lodging accounted for over 25 percent of all travel expenditures. Shopping accounted for nearly 22 percent of the purchases. Attractions and transportation collected nine and five percent, respectively. Souvenir purchases contributed four percent of the total. 6

7

EVENT ATTENDANCE Attendance exceeded 1.9 million at the 385 events held at KEC and KICC in 2014 (Table 2). Important contributors to economic impact, conventions and trade shows, showed increases over the numbers reported for 2005. Meetings also demonstrated a healthy growth between the two reporting years. A substantial decline was reported for sporting events and public expositions/sales. A major contributor to this decrease was the shift of University of Louisville basketball games from Freedom Hall to the new KFC Yum! Center in downtown Louisville. Given the up and down shifts within categories of events at the two facilities, the overall attendance between the two reporting years declined less than ten percent. Table 2 ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE AT KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD EVENTS Event 2014 Catered Party/Reception 5,825 Concerts 23,512 Conventions 235,154 Family Attractions 83,344 Livestock Events 24,166 Meetings, including Educational 123,465 Public Expositions & Sales 106,128 Sporting Events 199,764 State Fair 515,937 Trade Shows 611,495 Total 1,928,790 Tourism stimulates non-tourism industries such as agriculture, fishing, meatpacking, food processing, brewing and distilling, bottling, floriculture, construction and appliance, furniture, and linen manufacture. For example, demand for hotel rooms can create 8

demand for the services of contractors, which generates secondary demand for steel, bricks, lumber, tile, marble, glass, plumbing and air conditioning systems, elevator cars, carpets and a variety of other goods. Similarly, tourist demand for restaurant meals creates business not only for restaurants, but for producers and packagers of fresh and frozen foods, butchers, dairies, and ultimately, for manufacturers of farm implements and fertilizers. Consequently, a healthy tourism industry means additional business for industries throughout the economy. Where does this money go once it is in the local economy? Many hold the idea that it all goes to the service and retail sectors to support only low wage jobs. In reality, the economic benefits to the Louisville area are far more widespread. It helps support dozens of local businesses that do not directly serve the county's tourists. It impacts banking, insurance, and real estate; transportation and public utilities; construction; agriculture, and manufacturing. Employment In 2014, a total of 6,630 jobs (in FTEs [full time equivalents]) in the Louisville MSA were due to the expenditures made as a result of Kentucky State Fair Board activities (Table 1). The employment opportunities were distributed throughout the county. A number of the jobs in the community are supported, in part, by tourism. Since tourism jobs are dispersed throughout the local economy, they are more difficult to identify than factory jobs. This contributes to the misunderstanding of the size and importance of tourism to the local economy. 9

Wages The expenditures of travelers are the business receipts of the establishments patronized. A portion of these revenues is used by the businesses to pay their employees. The total new payroll generated by Kentucky State Fair Board events was nearly $134.3 million in 2014 (Table 1). Taxes Tourism generates state and local tax revenues. Tourism expenditures from Kentucky State Fair Board events resulted in the collection of over $36.4 million in tax revenues in 2014 (Table 1). Nearly $28.9 million of the net new taxes from non-resident spending was in the form of Kentucky state taxes. State sales and income taxes generated these Kentucky taxes. An additional $7.5 million in local taxes resulted from the non-resident spending. Local hotel and occupational taxes generated these Jefferson County taxes. APPENDIX A DATA AND METHODS In simplest terms the economic impact of tourism is a function of the number of visitors to the area under study and how much they spend while there. The research challenge is to accurately measure these quantities. Determining the economic impact of Kentucky State Fair Board events is a complicated task. The KEC and KICC facilities together hosted 385 events in 2014. These events generated over 1.9 million attendees. Exhibitors numbered in the thousands at the two facilities combined. 10

Kentucky State Fair Board Data were collected from a number of sources during the year-long research project. The Kentucky State Fair Board provided comprehensive information on the individual events at each facility including the number of attendees and type of event. A number of the events were defined as local and their attendees were excluded from the economic analysis. Accounting data on sales at KEC/KICC were obtained. It also provided contact information on a number of the event organizers/exhibitors. Organizers/Exhibitors Surveys contacted a sample of these event organizers/exhibitors with a mail survey to obtain supplemental information on number of staff at event, number of person-nights in local hotels, and total expenditures in Jefferson County. A copy of the survey form is in Appendix C. Visitor Spending Database/Surveys maintains an extensive database of visitor spending in Kentucky by tourism sector and geographic area. This database was supplemented with on-site surveys of attendees and exhibitors at selected Kentucky State Fair Board events. The surveys asked visitors to provide home zip code, how many people were in the party, how many days they were staying in the Louisville area, how many nights in local lodging, and how much they anticipated spending on lodging, meals, shopping, souvenirs, entertainment, transportation, and other expenses while in the area. Information obtained from Smith Travel Research reports available from the Kentucky Tourism, Arts, and Heritage Cabinet were also used to supplement the database. 11

License Plate Surveys In addition to the attendee surveys, also conducted extensive license plate surveys of vehicles in the parking lots during selected events. Since the economic impact depends on the numbers of visitors who arrive from outside the Louisville metro area, it is important to have a reasonably accurate estimate of the proportion of attendees at events who live outside the Louisville metro area. Vehicles were identified by state (and county for Kentucky and Indiana) issuing the license plate for the over five thousand vehicles found in parking lots during events. Multiplier Effects The indirect and induced expenditures, jobs, and payroll resulting from the initial infusion of money into the local economy were calculated using the RIMS II input-output (I-O) model developed by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. For continuity the final demand multipliers used for the 2005 study were used for the 2014 study. The tax revenues resulting from the events were also estimated. State and local tax revenues were obtained by using the appropriate sales tax rate, local lodging tax rate, income tax rate, and occupational tax rate. The goal was to maintain continuity with the 2005 study. Estimates of event-generated employment were obtained in a similar fashion. Appropriate employment multipliers were applied to expenditure data to determine jobs supported by the net new sales. An adjustment was made based on job to spending changes resulting from the 2008-2009 recession. The net effect was to reduce the employment impact of tourism spending. 12

The addition of the multiplier effects to the direct effects provided the complete picture of the economic impact of the Kentucky State Fair Board events presented in this report. APPENDIX B DEFINITION OF TERMS Direct Expenditure the exchange of money or the promise of money for goods or services while traveling in Louisville Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), including any advance purchase of public transportation, tickets, lodging or other items normally considered an incident of travel, but which may be purchased in advance of the trip. Indirect Expenditure the second and subsequent rounds of spending of the travel dollars (direct expenditures) in Kentucky for Kentucky-produced goods and services; i.e. the multiplier effect. Input-Output (I-O) Model an economic analysis method which is designed to measure the indirect and induced effects of a direct change in a region's economy. Travel and Tourism Industry the tourism industry consists of all those firms, organizations and facilities (including accommodations, food, transportation, and related services) which are intended to serve the specific needs and wants of travelers. 13

APPENDIX C Office Use Only Interview KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD EVENT QUESTIONNAIRE Please answer the following questions and return this sheet to in the enclosed business return envelope. 1. Number of staff attending and/or working event at Fair Board facility 2. Number of person-nights at Jefferson County hotels during event 3. Total expenditures in Jefferson County while at the event $ 4. Please provide a breakdown by major categories of expenditures, if possible. NOTE: is collecting this type of information for a sample of events held at Kentucky State Fair Board facilities in CY 2014. No information will be released in any way that would permit the identification of your business. All individual business information will remain confidential. 14

APPENDIX D SELECTED DATA TABLES ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE AT KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD EVENTS (2014) Event KEC KICC Catered Party/Reception 1,024 4,801 Concerts 23,512 -- Conventions 154,361 80,793 Family Attractions 83,344 -- Livestock Events 24,166 -- Meetings, including Educational 63,089 60,376 Public Expositions & Sales 84,262 21,866 Sporting Events 161,910 37,854 State Fair 515,937 -- Trade Shows 591,627 19,868 Total 1,703,232 225,558 KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT Revenues (FY 2013-2014) KEC/KICC Proceeds from Other Events $3,982,378 8.9% Gate Receipts 3,437,586 7.7 Parking Receipts 6,926,216 15.4 Fees 2,426,886 5.4 Concessions/Catering 3,690,178 8.2 Programs and Merchandise Sales 205,609 0.5 Space Rentals 11,321,489 25.3 Sales and Services 10,140,734 22.6 Other Receipts 2,674,692 6.0 Total $44,805,768 100.0% 15

APPENDIX E The economic impact generated by the two Kentucky State Fair Board facilities is provided below. The Kentucky Exposition Center (KEC) accounts for over $414.6 million of the total $482.3 million economic impact. The Kentucky International Convention Center (KICC) generates the other $67.7 million. This large difference is expected given the sizable difference in attendance between the two facilities shown in Appendix D. The results for new payroll, state taxes, local taxes, and employment mirror the difference in spending generated by the two facilities. KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD EVENTS ECONOMIC IMPACT FOR KEC AND KICC 2014 KEC KICC Total Expenditures $414,631,466 $67,682,966 Direct Expenditures $219,529,954 $36,332,463 Multiplier Expenditures $195,101,512 $31,350,503 Total New Payroll Generated $115,532,142 $18,732,343 Total Taxes $ 31,335,004 $ 5,080,647 Kentucky State Taxes $ 24,840,512 $ 4,027,632 Local Taxes, Jefferson County $ 6,494,492 $ 1,053,015 Total Employment Generated 5,705 925 16

TOP TWENTY EVENTS OF 2014 BASED ON TOTAL NONRESIDENT EXPENDITURES National Farm Machinery Show & Tractor Pull $20.1 million Mid-America Truck Show $19.3 million National Street Rod Association $17.7 million North American International Livestock Expo $16.1 million FFA National Convention $15.7 million Kentucky State Fair $15.3 million National Archery In Schools National Tournament $7.3 million WSF All Star Cheer & Dance Championship $6.8 million Active Ankle Bluegrass Tournament $6.1 million Green Industry & Equipment Expo $4.7 million AAU Boys Basketball Division 1 National Championship $3.5 million 2014 Kentuckiana All-Breed Dog Show $2.4 million Worldventures 2014 [KICC] $2.2 million United Methodist Women s Assembly [KICC] $1.8 million 22 nd Annual Show of Shows Antique Military Show $1.6 million 2014 NCA High School Open National Championship $1.5 million Kentucky Music Educators Association In-Service [KICC] $1.4 million BMX Bluegrass Nationals $1.3 million 2014 Kentucky Junior Beta Convention [KICC] $1.3 million 2014 Great Train Expo [KICC] $1.2 million This table provides, in rank order, the most economically important events in 2014. Events at KEC dominate the list, as expected. Shifts both in economic impact and rank occur for selected events compared to the list for the previous reporting period (2005). New events appear on this list and several events from the earlier reporting period no longer appear. This is due to the fact that the mix of events held in the two reporting periods is quite different. 17