Market Integration, Price Discovery, and Volatility in Agricultural Commodity Futures P.Ramasundaram* and Sendhil R**

Similar documents
Linkage between Gold and Crude Oil Spot Markets in India-A Cointegration and Causality Analysis

COINTEGRATION AND MARKET EFFICIENCY: AN APPLICATION TO THE CANADIAN TREASURY BILL MARKET. Soo-Bin Park* Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6

Volume 29, Issue 2. Measuring the external risk in the United Kingdom. Estela Sáenz University of Zaragoza

Government Tax Revenue, Expenditure, and Debt in Sri Lanka : A Vector Autoregressive Model Analysis

An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Macroeconomic Variables and Stock Prices in Bangladesh

Efficiency of Commodity Markets: A Study of Indian Agricultural Commodities

Testing the Stability of Demand for Money in Tonga

Conditional Heteroscedasticity and Testing of the Granger Causality: Case of Slovakia. Michaela Chocholatá

The Transmission of Price Volatility in the Beef Markets: A Multivariate Approach

Chapter 4 Level of Volatility in the Indian Stock Market

ESTIMATING MONEY DEMAND FUNCTION OF BANGLADESH

Sectoral Analysis of the Demand for Real Money Balances in Pakistan

Analysis of monetary policy variables with stock returns using var frame work

ON THE NEXUS BETWEEN SERVICES EXPORT AND SERVICE SECTOR GROWTH IN INDIAN CONTEXT

A study on the long-run benefits of diversification in the stock markets of Greece, the UK and the US

The Efficiency of Commodity Futures Market in Thailand. Santi Termprasertsakul, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand

Why the saving rate has been falling in Japan

The Demand for Money in China: Evidence from Half a Century

Equity Price Dynamics Before and After the Introduction of the Euro: A Note*

Do the Spot and Futures Markets for Commodities in India Move Together?

STUDY ON THE CONCEPT OF OPTIMAL HEDGE RATIO AND HEDGING EFFECTIVENESS: AN EXAMPLE FROM ICICI BANK FUTURES

Hedging Effectiveness of Currency Futures

EMPIRICAL STUDY ON RELATIONS BETWEEN MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES AND THE KOREAN STOCK PRICES: AN APPLICATION OF A VECTOR ERROR CORRECTION MODEL

Application of Structural Breakpoint Test to the Correlation Analysis between Crude Oil Price and U.S. Weekly Leading Index

Asian Economic and Financial Review THE EFFECT OF OIL INCOME ON REAL EXCHANGE RATE IN IRANIAN ECONOMY. Adibeh Savari. Hassan Farazmand.

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC DEBT RELEVANCE TO THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF THE USA

Structural Cointegration Analysis of Private and Public Investment

Jet Fuel-Heating Oil Futures Cross Hedging -Classroom Applications Using Bloomberg Terminal

Information Flows Between Eurodollar Spot and Futures Markets *

The Relationship between Inflation, Inflation Uncertainty and Output Growth in India

An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Dollarization in Cambodia *

Dynamics and Information Transmission between Stock Index and Stock Index Futures in China

MONEY, PRICES AND THE EXCHANGE RATE: EVIDENCE FROM FOUR OECD COUNTRIES

Thi-Thanh Phan, Int. Eco. Res, 2016, v7i6, 39 48

SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING POLICY COLLECTING THE REVENUES OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Dynamic Causal Relationships among the Greater China Stock markets

Cointegration and Price Discovery between Equity and Mortgage REITs

A Note on the Oil Price Trend and GARCH Shocks

Information Flow and Causality Relationship between Spot and Futures Market: Evidence from Cotton

The Demand for Money in Mexico i

Modeling Exchange Rate Volatility using APARCH Models

Relationship between Inflation and Unemployment in India: Vector Error Correction Model Approach

CAN MONEY SUPPLY PREDICT STOCK PRICES?

INTERNATIONAL LINKAGES OF THE INDIAN AGRICULTURE COMMODITY FUTURES MARKETS

EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPOT AND FUTURE PRICE OF CRUDE OIL

Asian Economic and Financial Review EXPLORING THE RETURNS AND VOLATILITY SPILLOVER EFFECT IN TAIWAN AND JAPAN STOCK MARKETS

DOES GOVERNMENT SPENDING GROWTH EXCEED ECONOMIC GROWTH IN SAUDI ARABIA?

Case Study: Predicting U.S. Saving Behavior after the 2008 Financial Crisis (proposed solution)

Does the Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis Hold for Canada?

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANNEL OF MONETARY POLICY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM IN SRI LANKA

Foreign direct investment and profit outflows: a causality analysis for the Brazilian economy. Abstract

Research Article The Volatility of the Index of Shanghai Stock Market Research Based on ARCH and Its Extended Forms

INFORMATION EFFICIENCY HYPOTHESIS THE FINANCIAL VOLATILITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC CASE

Forecasting the Philippine Stock Exchange Index using Time Series Analysis Box-Jenkins

A SEARCH FOR A STABLE LONG RUN MONEY DEMAND FUNCTION FOR THE US

A Note on the Oil Price Trend and GARCH Shocks

Exchange Rate Market Efficiency: Across and Within Countries

Relationship between Oil Price, Exchange Rates and Stock Market: An Empirical study of Indian stock market

The Economic Consequences of Dollar Appreciation for US Manufacturing Investment: A Time-Series Analysis

Impact of Some Selected Macroeconomic Variables (Money Supply and Deposit Interest Rate) on Share Prices: A Study of Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE)

Indian Institute of Management Calcutta. Working Paper Series. WPS No. 797 March Implied Volatility and Predictability of GARCH Models

An Empirical Study on the Dynamic Relationship between Foreign Institutional Investments and Indian Stock Market

Integration of Foreign Exchange Markets: A Short Term Dynamics Analysis

The Effects of Oil Shocks on Turkish Macroeconomic Aggregates

British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences 29 July 2017, Vol. 14 (1)

Foreign Capital inflows and Domestic Saving in Pakistan: Cointegration techniques and Error Correction Modeling

INTERDEPENDENCE OF THE BANKING SECTOR AND THE REAL SECTOR: EVIDENCE FROM OECD COUNTRIES

An empirical study on the dynamic relationship between crude oil prices and Nigeria stock market

RE-EXAMINE THE INTER-LINKAGE BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INFLATION:EVIDENCE FROM INDIA

Modelling Stock Market Return Volatility: Evidence from India

Modeling Volatility of Price of Some Selected Agricultural Products in Ethiopia: ARIMA-GARCH Applications

FOREIGN INVESTMENT INFLOWS AND INDUSTRIAL SECTOR GROWTH IN INDIA- AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

Empirical Analysis of Private Investments: The Case of Pakistan

Personal income, stock market, and investor psychology

Is the Thinly-Traded Butter Futures Contract Priced Efficiently?

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I

Optimal Hedge Ratio and Hedging Effectiveness of Stock Index Futures Evidence from India

An Econometric Analysis of Impact of Public Expenditure on Industrial Growth in Nigeria

Multivariate Causal Estimates of Dividend Yields, Price Earning Ratio and Expected Stock Returns: Experience from Malaysia

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2010, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

TRADE AND INTEGRATION OF THE US AND CHINA S COTTON MARKETS

Cointegration Tests and the Long-Run Purchasing Power Parity: Examination of Six Currencies in Asia

THE INFLATION - INFLATION UNCERTAINTY NEXUS IN ROMANIA

AGRICULTURAL & APPLIED ECONOMICS

Department of Economics Working Paper

AN INVESTIGATION ON THE TRANSACTION MOTIVATION AND THE SPECULATIVE MOTIVATION OF THE DEMAND FOR MONEY IN SRI LANKA

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ECONOMETRICS. Mr.

Chapter-3. Price Discovery Process

Relationship between Spot and Future Prices of Crude Oil: A Cointegration Analysis

Volatility in the Indian Financial Market Before, During and After the Global Financial Crisis

RISK SPILLOVER EFFECTS IN THE CZECH FINANCIAL MARKET

PRIVATE AND GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT: A STUDY OF THREE OECD COUNTRIES. MEHDI S. MONADJEMI AND HYEONSEUNG HUH* University of New South Wales

Forecasting Stock Index Futures Price Volatility: Linear vs. Nonlinear Models

How can saving deposit rate and Hang Seng Index affect housing prices : an empirical study in Hong Kong market

SOCIAL EXPENDITURE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FROM AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND USING COINTEGRATION AND CAUSALITY TESTS

The Main Determinants of Inflation in Sri Lanka A VAR based Analysis. H. P. G. S. Ratnasiri. Abstract

The source of real and nominal exchange rate fluctuations in Thailand: Real shock or nominal shock

Econometric Models for the Analysis of Financial Portfolios

The efficiency of emerging stock markets: empirical evidence from the South Asian region

Prerequisites for modeling price and return data series for the Bucharest Stock Exchange

Transcription:

Market Integration, Price Discovery, and Volatility in Agricultural Commodity Futures P.Ramasundaram* and Sendhil R** *National Coordinator (M&E), National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP), Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan II, Pusa, New Delhi - 110 012, India. **Scientist, Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India. Cointegration: If a linear combination of two non-stationary time series data results in a stationary error term, then the two series are cointegrated Price Discovery: It is a continuous process of arriving at a price at which a person buys and another sells a futures contract (commodity) in a commodity exchange Volatility: Volatility is an uncertain movement of a random variable over time Steps in Cointegration Test 1. Collect the time series data 2. Convert to natural logarithm 3. Check the original time series for unit root test (Augmented Dickey Fuller or Phillips Perron) 4. Check the first differenced series for unit root 5. Run the cointegration test 6. For cointegrated series, run the error correction model 7. Interpret the coefficients Steps in GARCH Model 1. Collect the time series data 2. Convert to natural logarithm 3. Take first difference (2 and 3 can be performed as a single EVIEWS command) 4. Run ARIMA filtration analysis and find the AR value 5. Run GARCH (Trial and Error). Choose the best fit model 6. Interpret the coefficients A. Cointegration: Illustrated Example in EVIEWS When a time series model is estimated, the first thing to make sure is that either all time series variables in the model are stationary or they are cointegrated, which means that they are integrated of the same order and errors are stationary, in which case the model defines a long run equilibrium relationship among the cointegrated variables. Therefore, a cointegration test generally takes two steps. The first step is to conduct a unit root test on each variable to find the order of integration. If all variables are integrated of the same order, the second step is to estimate the model, also called a cointegrating equation, and test whether the residual of the model is stationary. The purpose of this exercise is to implement the cointegration test in EVIEWS and also estimate the error correction model.

Spot and Futures Prices For this exercise time series data on wheat futures price (FP) of contract ending March 2010 and spot price (SP_Karnal) of Karnal market are used for illustrative purpose (www.ncdex.com). Since the fundamentals evolve over time, the prices changes over time. It may or may not be stationary (checked by unit root test). Date FP SP_Karnal Log_FP Log_SP_Karnal 10-Sep-09 1234.80 1132.50 7.12 7.03 11-Sep-09 1234.80 1140.00 7.12 7.04 12-Sep-09 1198.00 1137.50 7.09 7.04 14-Sep-09 1198.00 1130.00 7.09 7.03 15-Sep-09 1190.00 1132.50 7.08 7.03 16-Sep-09 1190.00 1157.50 7.08 7.05 17-Sep-09 1190.00 1130.00 7.08 7.03 18-Sep-09 1190.00 1132.50 7.08 7.03 19-Sep-09 1190.00 1130.00 7.08 7.03 21-Sep-09 1190.00 1130.00 7.08 7.03 22-Sep-09 1190.00 1135.00 7.08 7.03 23-Sep-09 1190.00 1140.00 7.08 7.04 24-Sep-09 1190.00 1135.00 7.08 7.03 25-Sep-09 1190.00 1142.50 7.08 7.04 26-Sep-09 1190.00 1125.00 7.08 7.03 28-Sep-09 1190.00 1125.00 7.08 7.03 29-Sep-09 1190.00 1130.00 7.08 7.03 30-Sep-09 1190.00 1130.00 7.08 7.03 1-Oct-09 1190.00 1135.00 7.08 7.03 3-Oct-09 1190.00 1135.00 7.08 7.03 5-Oct-09 1190.00 1140.00 7.08 7.04 6-Oct-09 1190.00 1132.50 7.08 7.03 7-Oct-09 1220.20 1132.50 7.11 7.03 8-Oct-09 1223.60 1140.00 7.11 7.04 9-Oct-09 1192.40 1142.50 7.08 7.04 10-Oct-09 1209.00 1136.00 7.10 7.04 12-Oct-09 1236.00 1167.50 7.12 7.06 13-Oct-09 1236.00 1167.50 7.12 7.06 14-Oct-09 1249.20 1135.00 7.13 7.03 15-Oct-09 1249.20 1125.00 7.13 7.03 16-Oct-09 1249.20 1200.00 7.13 7.09 17-Oct-09 1249.20 1200.00 7.13 7.09 19-Oct-09 1249.20 1200.00 7.13 7.09 20-Oct-09 1242.80 1180.00 7.13 7.07 21-Oct-09 1242.80 1165.00 7.13 7.06 22-Oct-09 1256.40 1145.00 7.14 7.04 23-Oct-09 1276.60 1260.00 7.15 7.14 24-Oct-09 1276.60 1275.00 7.15 7.15 26-Oct-09 1276.60 1250.00 7.15 7.13 27-Oct-09 1277.40 1337.50 7.15 7.20 28-Oct-09 1305.20 1300.00 7.17 7.17 29-Oct-09 1336.80 1250.00 7.20 7.13 30-Oct-09 1349.00 1305.00 7.21 7.17 31-Oct-09 1349.00 1325.00 7.21 7.19 2-Nov-09 1349.00 1325.00 7.21 7.19 3-Nov-09 1378.40 1300.00 7.23 7.17 4-Nov-09 1352.20 1300.00 7.21 7.17 5-Nov-09 1358.20 1350.00 7.21 7.21

6-Nov-09 1353.60 1400.00 7.21 7.24 7-Nov-09 1354.60 1400.00 7.21 7.24 9-Nov-09 1335.20 1400.00 7.20 7.24 10-Nov-09 1307.20 1400.00 7.18 7.24 11-Nov-09 1336.80 1412.50 7.20 7.25 12-Nov-09 1337.20 1425.00 7.20 7.26 13-Nov-09 1317.60 1400.00 7.18 7.24 14-Nov-09 1304.80 1405.50 7.17 7.25 16-Nov-09 1324.20 1405.50 7.19 7.25 17-Nov-09 1343.20 1400.00 7.20 7.24 18-Nov-09 1361.80 1400.00 7.22 7.24 19-Nov-09 1372.00 1407.50 7.22 7.25 20-Nov-09 1357.60 1400.00 7.21 7.24 21-Nov-09 1365.00 1400.00 7.22 7.24 23-Nov-09 1365.00 1400.00 7.22 7.24 24-Nov-09 1370.20 1400.00 7.22 7.24 25-Nov-09 1351.20 1390.00 7.21 7.24 26-Nov-09 1360.00 1392.50 7.22 7.24 27-Nov-09 1358.80 1400.00 7.21 7.24 30-Nov-09 1369.00 1400.00 7.22 7.24 1-Dec-09 1355.20 1395.00 7.21 7.24 2-Dec-09 1355.20 1400.00 7.21 7.24 3-Dec-09 1361.40 1390.00 7.22 7.24 4-Dec-09 1366.00 1390.00 7.22 7.24 5-Dec-09 1367.60 1390.00 7.22 7.24 7-Dec-09 1375.20 1400.00 7.23 7.24 8-Dec-09 1358.00 1400.00 7.21 7.24 9-Dec-09 1363.80 1400.00 7.22 7.24 10-Dec-09 1339.20 1400.00 7.20 7.24 11-Dec-09 1344.00 1400.00 7.20 7.24 12-Dec-09 1342.40 1400.00 7.20 7.24 14-Dec-09 1334.00 1400.00 7.20 7.24 15-Dec-09 1297.40 1400.00 7.17 7.24 16-Dec-09 1276.40 1400.00 7.15 7.24 17-Dec-09 1279.00 1400.00 7.15 7.24 18-Dec-09 1278.40 1400.00 7.15 7.24 19-Dec-09 1297.60 1400.00 7.17 7.24 21-Dec-09 1275.40 1390.00 7.15 7.24 22-Dec-09 1270.80 1390.00 7.15 7.24 23-Dec-09 1266.20 1400.00 7.14 7.24 24-Dec-09 1280.00 1370.00 7.15 7.22 26-Dec-09 1290.60 1385.00 7.16 7.23 28-Dec-09 1284.80 1390.00 7.16 7.24 29-Dec-09 1280.00 1390.00 7.15 7.24 30-Dec-09 1286.00 1385.00 7.16 7.23 31-Dec-09 1285.20 1392.50 7.16 7.24 1-Jan-10 1278.40 1395.00 7.15 7.24 2-Jan-10 1296.80 1395.00 7.17 7.24 4-Jan-10 1291.60 1375.00 7.16 7.23 5-Jan-10 1292.00 1390.00 7.16 7.24 6-Jan-10 1294.00 1387.50 7.17 7.24 7-Jan-10 1299.00 1412.50 7.17 7.25 8-Jan-10 1313.40 1400.00 7.18 7.24 9-Jan-10 1322.80 1400.00 7.19 7.24 11-Jan-10 1327.80 1370.00 7.19 7.22 12-Jan-10 1341.00 1370.00 7.20 7.22 Hands-on-Session

13-Jan-10 1322.80 1390.00 7.19 7.24 14-Jan-10 1325.40 1400.00 7.19 7.24 15-Jan-10 1317.00 1400.00 7.18 7.24 16-Jan-10 1310.60 1400.00 7.18 7.24 18-Jan-10 1296.00 1415.00 7.17 7.25 19-Jan-10 1291.80 1407.50 7.16 7.25 20-Jan-10 1309.00 1400.00 7.18 7.24 21-Jan-10 1295.80 1407.50 7.17 7.25 22-Jan-10 1290.00 1400.00 7.16 7.24 23-Jan-10 1295.20 1425.00 7.17 7.26 25-Jan-10 1285.60 1380.00 7.16 7.23 27-Jan-10 1278.40 1400.00 7.15 7.24 28-Jan-10 1271.40 1375.00 7.15 7.23 29-Jan-10 1279.20 1385.00 7.15 7.23 30-Jan-10 1281.00 1410.00 7.16 7.25 1-Feb-10 1285.00 1385.00 7.16 7.23 2-Feb-10 1292.00 1370.00 7.16 7.22 3-Feb-10 1285.80 1385.00 7.16 7.23 4-Feb-10 1281.00 1387.50 7.16 7.24 5-Feb-10 1286.00 1385.00 7.16 7.23 6-Feb-10 1290.60 1400.00 7.16 7.24 8-Feb-10 1284.00 1370.00 7.16 7.22 9-Feb-10 1285.40 1400.00 7.16 7.24 10-Feb-10 1282.80 1390.00 7.16 7.24 11-Feb-10 1289.60 1400.00 7.16 7.24 12-Feb-10 1289.60 1400.00 7.16 7.24 13-Feb-10 1306.60 1392.50 7.18 7.24 15-Feb-10 1304.20 1385.00 7.17 7.23 16-Feb-10 1309.20 1385.00 7.18 7.23 17-Feb-10 1320.40 1387.50 7.19 7.24 18-Feb-10 1314.80 1375.00 7.18 7.23 19-Feb-10 1312.80 1400.00 7.18 7.24 20-Feb-10 1319.60 1400.00 7.19 7.24 22-Feb-10 1286.60 1385.00 7.16 7.23 23-Feb-10 1287.80 1385.00 7.16 7.23 24-Feb-10 1275.00 1370.00 7.15 7.22 25-Feb-10 1293.20 1385.00 7.16 7.23 26-Feb-10 1290.80 1362.50 7.16 7.22 27-Feb-10 1284.20 1387.50 7.16 7.24 1-Mar-10 1284.20 1387.50 7.16 7.24 2-Mar-10 1266.20 1385.00 7.14 7.23 3-Mar-10 1263.80 1385.00 7.14 7.23 4-Mar-10 1253.00 1375.00 7.13 7.23 5-Mar-10 1260.40 1375.00 7.14 7.23 6-Mar-10 1262.60 1350.00 7.14 7.21 8-Mar-10 1241.60 1345.00 7.12 7.20 9-Mar-10 1220.20 1347.50 7.11 7.21 10-Mar-10 1224.80 1320.00 7.11 7.19 11-Mar-10 1229.80 1312.50 7.11 7.18 12-Mar-10 1234.00 1305.00 7.12 7.17 13-Mar-10 1241.60 1300.00 7.12 7.17 15-Mar-10 1260.00 1315.00 7.14 7.18 16-Mar-10 1266.60 1337.50 7.14 7.20 17-Mar-10 1271.80 1300.00 7.15 7.17 18-Mar-10 1272.80 1305.00 7.15 7.17 19-Mar-10 1279.40 1300.00 7.15 7.17 Hands-on-Session

In this exercise, unit root test and the integration between spot and futures prices are examined for the above dataset. 1. Collect the time series data. Save as a single sheet in Excel 2003 format for compatibility purpose. Recent versions of EVIEWS like EVIEWS 7 (Enterprise Edition) will take any excel extension. 2. Import the original data to EVIEWS just by dragging it to the software window or copy and paste or menu driven 3. Convert the original data to log values in excel and then import to EVIEWS or import the original data to EVIEWS and then convert to log values with the following command. Transform the SP into its natural log by Genr LSP = log(sp), and similarly transform FP also into its natural log and save the newly generated log variables. 4. Do the unit root test. The first step of testing cointegration is to test all the time series variables for stationarity. Therefore, conduct the augmented Dickey Fuller unit root test or Phillips Perron test on each of the series: LFP and LSP_Karnal, and verify that each of these series is integrated of order one. Check the graphs too.

In the unit root test of levels, always include intercept and also time trend if the data has a trend. In the unit root test of first differences, include only the intercept Note: View Unit Root Test Choose the Option OK 5. Now carry out the cointegration test. If two time series variables are nonstationary, but cointegrated, at any point in time the two variables may drift apart, but there will always be a tendency for them to retain a reasonable proximity to each other. There may be more than one cointegrating relationship among cointegrated variables. Johansen test provides estimates of all such cointegrating equations and provides a test statistic for the number of cointegrating equations. 1 1 It is a likelihood ratio test statistic that Johansen test presents along with the critical values.

Note: Open the Log Transformed Data View Cointegration Test - OK. A Johansen cointegration test window appears. Choose linear deterministic trend in data, select Intercept (no trend) in CE and test VAR 2 (Option No. 3). Specify the appropriate number of lag intervals (1 1 in our case, i.e., 1 lag and 1 4 if the series is quarterly) 3. Finally, if there is any truly exogenous variable it has to be specified, other than the intercept and the time trend, included in the model. In the present illustration there is no such exogenous variable; and therefore, do not enter any name for exogenous series. The Johansen test uses the VAR method, in which all cointegrated series are considered endogenous. Click OK to get the cointegration test result. In the very first table of this result, start from the first row and compare the likelihood ratio (LR) value or trace statistic with the 5 percent critical value. If the value exceeds the critical value, go down to the next row and compare the value with the critical value in that row. Repeat this process until you reach the row in which the trace statistic is lower than the critical value. Stop at that row; do not move down any further. The last column in this row gives you the number of cointegrating equations for the integrated variables, and at the bottom of this table, the conclusion of the test, as to how many cointegrating equations are indicated, is stated. Below the likelihood ratio test table, there would be a number of other tables. Only look for the table(s) that has normalized cointegrating coefficients, in which the coefficient of one of the two variables is normalized to one. There may be more than one table with normalized coefficients (in case of more than two variables). If the above mentioned LR test indicates one cointegrating equation, look at the first normalized coefficient table only. If the test indicates two cointegrating equations, look at the second normalized coefficient table, and so on. A normalized coefficient table presents the estimate of the model (cointegrating equation) with all variables taken to the left hand side. Below each coefficient estimate, the standard error is given within parentheses. The ratio of the coefficient to its standard error is the t-statistic. 2 The test allows a choice among three options regarding the deterministic time trend of data: no trend, linear trend and quadratic trend. Select the appropriate nature of trend. 3 The appropriate lag length may be decided through the AIC or SIC criterion.

Estimation of Error Correction Model According to the Granger representation theorem, when variables are cointegrated, there must also be an error correction model (ECM) that describes the short-run dynamics or adjustments of the cointegrated variables towards their equilibrium values. ECM consists of one-period lagged cointegrating equation and the lagged first differences of the endogenous variables. Using the Vector Autoregression (VAR) method, ECM can be estimated. The model involves two nonstationary variables; therefore, ECM would be a simultaneous equation system of two equations, one for each variable describing the short run adjustment of that variable towards the long run equilibrium. The adjustment process may take a number of periods and thus each equation in the ECM will have lagged variables. It is important to include the appropriate number of lags. Note: Select the Variables - Open - as VAR. A new window on Vector Autoregression appears. Under VAR specification, click on Vector Error Correction, type in lag intervals 1 1 to allow for one period lag length, check that sample period is correct (if necessary, correct it), type in endogenous variables (which would be all the series in this illustration), type in any exogenous variable (none in this case, leave it blank), choose the trend in the cointegrating equation, as was done above for the Johansen test (VAR assumes linear trend in data: intercept (no trend in CE), type in the number of CE s (1 in our case), and click OK. 4 The ECM estimates will appear immediately. The first table presents the estimates of the cointegrating equation, and the second table presents the rest of the ECM. The first row in the second table presents the estimates of the speed of adjustment coefficient for each variable, their standard errors and the t-statistics. Present the results and interpret the coefficients. 4 See footnote three for the appropriate number of lags.

B. GARCH: Illustrated Example in EVIEWS For this exercise, time series data on wheat spot price (SP_Karnal) of Karnal market is used for illustration. Since the economic fundamentals evolve over a period of time, prices tends to be volatile (random movement) over time which can be captured by the GARCH coefficients. Note: Import the variable (SP_Karnal) for which volatility has to be measured. Now select Quick Estimate Equation from the menu. A new window will appear. Under Methods select ARCH, a new window will appear again and in that type the order of ARCH and GARCH coefficients. Type the dependent variable dlog(sp_karnal) in the space and then click OK to get the GARCH estimates. Run different models and choose the best model based on the AIC or LR criterion. Present the results and interpret the coefficients.

Exercise for Trainees Table 1. Estimated ADF and PP statistic for unit root test in wheat Test statistic Contract period Futures market price Spot market price Level 1 st difference Level 1 st difference ADF PP 10.09.09 to 19.03.10 Note: * indicates significance at one per cent of MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values Order Table 2. Estimated AIC and SIC value for optimum lag length Criteria Contract period Value Order of lag length AIC SIC 10.09.09 to 19.03.10 Table 3. Estimates of Johansen s cointegration test Eigen Contract period Correlation value Trace statistic Null hypothesis Log likelihood 10.09.09 to 19.03.10 Note: ***, ** and * denote the rejection of null hypothesis at 1, 5 and 10 per cent level of significance ^ indicates the significance of correlation coefficient at 1 per cent level of probability (2 tailed) Table 4. Estimates of vector error correction model Cointegration equation Error correction estimates Contract period Constant Coefficient Futures price Spot price 10.09.09 to 19.03.10 Note: Figures in parentheses indicate the standard error (0.1704) (0.0340) (0.0276) Table 5. Estimates of fitted GARCH model for wheat spot price Particulars Observations (days) Standard deviation C.V (%) GARCH estimates GARCH fit order Constant Estimates of ARCH term (α i) 2 t 1 2 t 2 2 t 3 Estimates of GARCH term (β i) 2 t 1 2 t 2 2 t 3 Log likelihood αi + βi Estimates Volatility level Note: ** Significant at 1 per cent level of probability (z statistic) and * Significant at 5 per cent level of probability (z statistic)

Suggested Readings Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31: 307-327. Dickey, D and Fuller, W.A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series regressions with unit roots, Journal of American Statistical Association, 74: 427-431. Easwaran, S.R., and Ramasundaram, P., Whether the Commodity Futures in Agriculture are Efficient in Price Discovery? - An Econometric Analysis. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 2008, 21, 337-344. Engle, R.F and Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and error-correction: Representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica, 55: 251-276. Engle, R.F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation, Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1007. Fackler, P. (1996). Spatial Price Analysis: A Methodological Review, Mimeo.North Carolina State University. Garbade, K.D and Silber, W.L. (1982). Price movements and price discovery in future and cash markets, Review of Economics and Statistics, 65: 289-297. Garbade, K.D and Silber, W.L. (1983). Dominant satellite relationship between live cattle cash and futures markets, The Journal of Futures Markets, 10(2): 123-136. Goodwin, B.K and Schroeder, T.C. (1991). Cointegration tests and spatial price linkages in regional cattle markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73: 452-64. Granger, C. (1981). Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification, Journal of Econometrics, 16: 121-130. Guida, T and Matringe, O. (2004). Application of GARCH models in forecasting the volatility of Agricultural commodities, UNCTAD Publications. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12: 231-254. Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vectors auto regression models, Econometrica, 59: 1551-80. Johansen, S. (1994). The role of the constant and linear terms in cointegration analysis of nonstationary variables, Econometric Reviews, 13: 205-229. Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based interference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sendhil, R., Amit Kar, Mathur, V.C. and Jha, G.K., Price discovery, transmission and volatility: Evidence from agricultural commodity futures. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 2013, 26 (1): 41-54. Singh, N.P., Kumar, R., Singh, R.P and Jain, P.K. (2005). Is futures market mitigating price risk: An exploration of wheat and maize market, Agricultural Economics Research Review, 18: 35-46.