Summary: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Hospital. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research.

Similar documents
April 10,

28 ИЮНЯ 2012 Г. 1

Friendswood, Texas; General Obligation

Southern California Metropolitan Water District; General Obligation; Water/Sewer

Summary: Windsor, Connecticut; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Research. March 12,

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, North Carolina; CP; Joint Criteria; System

Summary: Fresno, California; Appropriations; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research.

Shenandoah, Texas; General Obligation

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp., MBIA Inc. Ratings Raised On Reentry Into Financial Markets; Outlooks Are Stable

Illinois Finance Authority Rush University Medical Center Obligated Group; Joint Criteria; System

Springfield, Michigan; General Obligation

Summary: San Benito, Texas; General Obligation

Research Update: Grupo de Inversiones Suramericana S.A. 'BBB-' Ratings Affirmed, Off CreditWatch On Successful Capitalization Plan.

Summary: San Mateo County Community College District, California; Appropriations; General Obligation. Table Of Contents

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California; Sales Tax

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District, Oregon; Miscellaneous Tax

Frederick City, Maryland; General Obligation

Interactive Brokers LLC

PPPs, Contingent Liabilities And Sovereign s Credit Quality

Hartford County Metropolitan District, Connecticut; General Obligation

Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1, Washington; Retail Electric

Albany County Airport Authority, New York Albany International Airport; Airport

Navigators International Insurance Co. Ltd. Assigned 'A' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Summary: Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District, Louisiana; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Research

Connecticut; State Revolving Funds/Pools

Wicomico County, Maryland; General Obligation

Puerto Rico; General Obligation; General Obligation Equivalent Security

Bay City, Michigan; General Obligation

Canton, Massachusetts; General Obligation; Note

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago; General Obligation

Health Care Service Corp. d/b/a Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Montana Downgraded

Burlington, Massachusetts; General Obligation; Note

Lancaster County Hospital Authority, Pennsylvania Masonic Villages of the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania; Long Term Care

Chicago Board of Education; General Obligation

Montebello Public Financing Authority Montebello, California; Appropriations; General Obligation

U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Children's Hospital Median Financial Ratios

Lyndhurst Township, New Jersey; General Obligation

Research Update: Telekom Austria AG Downgraded To 'BBB' On Likely Weaker Credit Measures; 'A-2' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Stable.

Gainesville, Florida Gainesville Regional Utilities; CP; Combined Utility

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, California; Ports/Port Authorities

RMBS ARREARS STATISTICS

Estonian Power Utility Eesti Energia 'BBB' Ratings On CreditWatch Negative On Announced Plans To Acquire Nelja Energia

Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

Connecticut; Gas Tax

Apex Town, North Carolina; General Obligation

Providence Water Supply Board, Rhode Island; Water/Sewer

Dell Inc. Corporate Credit Rating Affirmed; Outlook Revised To Positive On Debt Reduction Expectations

Research Update: Austria-Based KA Finanz 'A/A-1' Ratings Affirmed, Outlook Stable. Table Of Contents

S&P's Views Of GASB's Proposed Changes In Government Pension Accounting

City of Windsor 'AA' Ratings Affirmed On Low Debt Burden And Exceptional Liquidity; Outlook Stable

Linden-Kildare Consolidated Independent School District, Texas; General Obligation

Stonington, Connecticut; General Obligation; Note

U.K. Life Insurer Scottish Equitable 'A+' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative

Standard & Poor s Presentation Virginia GFOA

Brightwaters Village, New York; General Obligation

Chubb Insurance Singapore Ltd.

Italian Multi-Utility Hera Outlook Revised To Negative On Delayed Credit Metric Recovery; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Jacksonville, Florida; General Obligation; Miscellaneous Tax

Elenia Finance Oyj. Primary Credit Analyst: Alf Stenqvist, Stockholm (46) ;

AXA China Region Insurance Co. (Bermuda) Ltd. And AXA China Region Insurance Co. Ltd. Rated 'AA-'; Outlook Stable

Research Update: Kingdom of Belgium Outlook Revised To Negative On Political Deadlock; 'AA+/A-1+' Rating Affirmed.

ING Verzekeringen N.V.

Temasek Holdings 'AAA/A-1+' Ratings Affirmed On Close Government Ties; Outlook Stable

Three Euler Hermes Companies Upgraded To 'AA' From 'AA-' Due To Revised Status Within The Allianz Group; Outlook Stable

Build NYC Resource Corp. YMCA Of Greater New York; Non-Profit Organizations

Spain-Based Banco Popular Espanol Ratings Raised To 'BBB+/A-2' On Acquisition By Santander; Outlook Positive

Mound, MInnesota; General Obligation

NN Group 'A-' And Core Subsidiary 'A+' Ratings Remain On CreditWatch Negative After Offer On Delta Lloyd

Monrovia, California; Appropriations; General Obligation

Dutch Energy Distribution Network Operator Enexis Holding N.V. Assigned 'A-1' Short-Term Rating

Gabriel Petek, CFA Managing Director U.S. Public Finance Copyright 2016 by S&P Global. All rights reserved.

Prince William County, Virginia; Appropriations; General Obligation

Comision Federal de Electricidad, PEMEX, And Subsidiaries Local Currency Ratings Cut To 'A-' On Change In S&P Criteria

U.S. Not-For-Profit Acute Health Care Stand-Alone Hospital Median Financial Ratios vs. 2015

Swiss Financial Services Provider PostFinance AG Assigned 'AA+/A-1+' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Petroleos Mexicanos, Its Subsidiaries, And Comision Federal de Electricidad Outlooks Revised To Stable From Negative

Research Update: National Australia Bank Ltd. & Subsidiaries Ratings Lowered On Criteria Change. Table Of Contents

Mediobanca SpA. Primary Credit Analyst: Regina Argenio, Milan (39) ;

Highmark Inc. Outlook Revised To Positive From Stable; 'A-' Ratings Affirmed

Germany-Based Specialty Insurer Inter Hannover Downgraded To 'A+' On Change Of Group Structure; Outlook Stable

City of Winnipeg 'AA' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable

Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico Downgraded To 'CC' From 'CCC-' On Imminent Default; Outlook Negative

Illinois Finance Authority UNO Charter School Network; Charter Schools

African Reinsurance Corp. 'A-' Ratings Affirmed After Insurance Criteria Change; Outlook Stable

Territory of Yukon 'AA' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Is Stable

Credit Suisse (Schweiz) AG Assigned 'A/A-1' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Parker Water & Sanitation District, Colorado; General Obligation

U.K.-Based Housing Association Notting Hill Home Ownership Assigned 'AA' Rating; Outlook Stable

Vier Gas Transport GmbH (Open Grid Europe Group)

R.V.I. Guaranty Co. Ltd. Upgraded To 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable

U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Sector Medians, Perspective

Outlook On BrokerCreditService (Cyprus) Revised To Positive On Better Group Funding Profile; 'B/B' Ratings Affirmed

Icelandic Bank Islandsbanki Affirmed At 'BBB-/A-3' After Change To Agreement With Glitnir; Outlook Still Stable

Dutch BNG Bank And NWB Bank Ratings Raised To 'AAA' Following Similar Action On The Netherlands; Outlooks Stable

Dutch Bank LeasePlan 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Placed On Watch Negative On Potential Ownership Change

Sovereign Rating Trends In Central America

Bristol, Connecticut; General Obligation; Note

Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

Irish Life Assurance Rating Raised To 'A-' Based On Criteria For Rating Above The Sovereign; Outlook Stable

Germany-Based Santander Consumer Bank Outlook Revised To Stable From Positive; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Transcription:

November 29, 2011 Summary: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Hospital Primary Credit Analyst: Stephen Infranco, New York (1) 212-438-2025; stephen_infranco@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Martin D Arrick, New York (1) 212-438-7963; martin_arrick@standardandpoors.com Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 1

Summary: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Hospital Credit Profile US$400.0 mil rev bnds ser 2011 due 12/31/2041 Long Term Rating AA-/Stable New New York State Dorm Auth, New York Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York New York St Dorm Auth (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center) Series 1998 Unenhanced Rating AA-(SPUR)/Stable Downgraded New York St Dorm Auth (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center) Series 2008A-1, 2008A-2, 2006 and 2003-1 Long Term Rating AA-/Stable Downgraded Many issues are enhanced by bond insurance. Rationale Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has lowered its long-term rating and underlying rating (SPUR) on various series of New York State Dormitory Authority's health care revenue bonds, issued for Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), to 'AA-' from 'AA'. Standard & Poor's has also assigned its 'AA-' long-term rating to MSKCC's $400 million series 2011 taxable revenue bonds. The outlook is stable. The 'AA-' rating on the series 2011 bonds and the downgrade on MSKCC's existing rated debt reflects a sizable debt increase that occurs over a two-year period (2010 to 2012) that negatively affects key financial metrics, including cash to pro forma debt, pro forma leverage, pro forma debt burden, and pro forma coverage of maximum annual debt service (MADS), all of which are no longer consistent with a 'AA' rated hospital. The rating continues to incorporate what we consider an excellent business position and historically strong fund raising capacity. The additional debt includes the $400 million series 2011 bonds coupled with an unrated $80 million series 2010 debt issue (September 2010) that was used to finance the purchase of real estate of the former Cabrini Medical Center, and the expectation of an additional $100 million of tax-exempt debt in the first quarter of 2012. Other factors considered include MSKCC's projected total capital spending plan of $3.5 billion over the next 10 years, to be funded by a combination of excess cash flow, fundraising, and debt. In our opinion, MSKCC's current level of cash flow is not robust enough to materially strengthen key financial metrics in the near term to bring the certain balance sheet metrics up to 'AA' levels, while supporting higher levels of capital spending and future carrying charges. MSKCC's EBIDA margin (excluding unrealized gains and losses), which historically averaged a strong 16% annually from fiscal 2001 through fiscal 2008, has averaged just 9.2% over the past two fiscal years (unrealized gains totaled $275 million and $504 million in fiscals 2010 and 2009, respectively). In addition, while we recognize that there will be fluctuations in nonoperating revenue from year to year due to the variability of contributions and realized compared with unrealized gains, the nine-month results ended Sept 30, 2011, indicate a continuation of the softer cash-flow trend. Standard & Poors RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal November 29, 2011 2

Summary: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Hospital The 'AA-' rating further reflects our view of MSKCC's: Very strong institutional characteristics, highlighted by demonstrated clinical quality, a large research base, and a leading market position in the broad, but fragmented, New York metropolitan oncology market; Strong unrestricted cash balances and operational liquidity, with $2.85 billion of cash and investments equal to 483 days' cash on hand at fiscal year-end 2010; Good revenue diversity, with patient care, research, fundraising, and royalties all contributing to a robust revenue stream that provides flexibility; Improving operating results for the nine-month interim period ended Sept. 30, 2011, in part due to volume and rate increases, but also due to management's success at containing costs, and Strong management team with a history of financial planning, coupled with above-average financial flexibility that includes a strong payor mix, the flexibility to reduce expenditures through limiting research and clinical subsidies, and the capacity to increase demand by lifting current self-imposed limits on caseloads. Offsetting credit factors include: Weakening of debt-related metrics with the issuance of the $400 million series 2011 bonds and expected $100 million series 2012 bonds, reducing cash to debt to approximately 152% and increasing leverage to 38% as of Sept. 30, 2011; Risks that are typical of a single-specialty institution, including changes in the provision of cancer care and exposure to medical breakthroughs in cancer treatment; MSKCC's unfunded pension liability for the defined-benefit pension plan, which as of Dec. 31, 2010, had a $292 million unfunded liability (based on PBO) or a 64% funded status as a percent of the total benefit obligation, both vested and unvested; and A large capital plan that totals approximately $3.5 billion over a 10-year period (2011-2020), but management has demonstrated an ability to reduce capital spending, if needed, in a challenging financial environment. Other credit factors include a conservative debt profile that consists of all fixed-rate debt, with no exposure to variable-rate debt or derivatives and a complicated legal structure that offers different springing security pledges for different bondholders, but is weak in certain respects--specifically, the rate covenant is not a true income statement test and permitted liens are very broad for a general obligation (GO) pledge. MSKCC has approximately $1.26 billion of long-term debt as of fiscal year-end 2010, rising to $1.66 billion with the series 2011 taxable debt and again to approximately $1.76 billion with the expected $100 million tax exempt issuance in the first quarter of 2012. Management has indicated that the expected amortization of existing debt over the next 10 years will total approximately $325 million. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center is one of the three major entities forming MSKCC and its related corporations. The center holds the majority of the assets, including most of the endowments and unrestricted liquidity. The entities are the center, the Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases, and the Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research. Boards of overseers and managers that are virtually identical govern the three entities. Other entities include SKI Realty Inc. and one professional and general insurance company. As the various entities are managed on a unified basis and the boards are almost entirely overlapping, Standard & Poor's analysis and all the figures cited in this analysis apply to the entire group of corporations, which is referred to as MSKCC. Furthermore, all financial calculations and ratios are presented based on Standard & Poor's guidelines and may differ from the audited financial statement presentation. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 3

Summary: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Hospital The series 2011 bonds are being issued to finance future capital needs. MSKCC bonds are GOs of the center, guaranteed by the institute and the realty corporation. The hospital is not directly obligated on the bonds. If MSKCC fails certain tests, springing collateral pledges--including gross receipts, pledges of portions of MSKCC, and springing mortgages--become activated until the tests are subsequently met. The specifics of the springing revenue pledges and the springing mortgages are different for each of the various series of bonds. The series share certain common security, but each also has unique collateral that is specific to the series individually. Simply, each series has its own security--the ratings on each are the same. Outlook The outlook is stable. We believe MSKCC's operating and excess income can be quite volatile in any given year, due to the variability of nonoperating income, which includes realized gains and losses and contributions. However, we believe operating losses have historically been manageable and understand they are planned as part of the normal business model. While cash flow as measured by Standard & Poor's has been weaker of late, over the longer term we expect improvement, especially given the anticipated benefit of the incremental revenue and cash flow once the projects are complete and operations ramp up. Furthermore, management has demonstrated a willingness to delay projects to preserve financial stability should operational performance or market conditions shift. In our opinion, MSKCC's still-large balance sheet resources and management's operating flexibility (due to its ability to control certain discretionary patient services, if needed) lend stability to the current outlook at the 'AA-' level and a lower rating or outlook is unlikely. However, if cash flow remains below 10% and coverage of MADS remains weak on a consistent basis, or future debt increases weaken the financial profile further; we could consider a negative outlook or lower rating. A higher rating can be achieved if cash flow improves and is sustained at historical levels in the 13% to16% range such that MSKCC can fund future capital needs while improving key balance sheet metrics to levels more consistent with a higher rating, such as cash to debt above 2x and leverage below 30%. For more information, see the full analysis published Nov. 29, 2011, on RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal. Related Criteria And Research USPF Criteria: Not-For-Profit Health Care, June 14, 2007 Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal at www.globalcreditportal.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column. Standard & Poors RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal November 29, 2011 4

Copyright 2011 by Standard & Poors Financial Services LLC (S&P), a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P's opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 5