Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

Similar documents
FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

HUD 2016 System Performance Measures Submission Recap. NYC Coalition on the Continuum of Care October 20, 2017

Summary of 3 County CoC SPM Report Data

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - Updated July 1, June 30, 2019

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - finalized July 1, June 30, 2017

2018 Performance Management Plan. Ohio Balance of State Continuum of Care Updated January 2018

Office of Community Planning and Development

Using Data to Make Funding and Reallocation Decisions

[HUDX-225] HMIS Data Quality Report Reference Tool

Attachment C. Updated March 23 rd, 2018 by EveryOne Home

Continuum of Care Written Standards for NY- 508 Buffalo, Niagara Falls/Erie, Niagara, Orleans, Genesee, Wyoming Counties CoC

HUD-ESG CAPER User Guide

King County Base Year Calculator Results Emergency Shelter for Family Projects Performance Summary March 11, 2016

FY16 HUD CoC Program Consolidated Application Scoring Criteria Summary June 2016

HUD CoC Reviewing, Scoring and Ranking Procedure

AGENDA. 1. Welcome and Introductions. 2. Review IRP Meeting Summary from Feb. 7, HUD CoC Program NOFA

Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Continuum of Care 2017 Renewal Project Performance Scorecard

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

SACRAMENTO HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM: DATA QUALITY PLAN

APR Data: # of Clients: # of Households # of Adults # of Leavers: # of Adult Leavers:

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

FY2017 CoC Program Competition Application Score Cards

HMIS PROGRAMMING SPECIFICATIONS

HMIS 320 APR Training

2018 Kentucky Balance of State CoC Expansion Project Scoresheet for RRH and PSH Projects (Approved by KY BoS CoC Advisory Board August 3, 2018)

COC RANKING For Grant Year 2017

NY-606/Rockland County CoC Rank & Review - Attachments Checklist

2017 Saratoga-North Country CoC Project Rank & Review Application

Blue Ridge Interagency Council on Homelessness

Measure 1: Length of Time Persons Remain Homeless

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2016 Key Performance Indicators

FY2019 HCCSC SCORING CRITERIA AND SCORE SHEET

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the BYC and SPP

Before Starting the Exhibit 1 Continuum of Care (CoC) Application

Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative 2016 CoC NOFA Evaluation Tool for Renewal Project Applications

HMIS Programming Specifications PATH Annual Report. January 2018

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2014 Key Performance Indicators

Exhibit 5-3: Sample Performance Measurement Framework (Note that all activities, outputs, outcomes, and percentages are hypothetical.

2019 Housing Inventory Count (HIC) Guidance Document

1A. Continuum of Care (CoC) Identification

The Community Partnership How to Run the CoC-APR 2018 Report Version 1 Last Updated December 17, 2018

2014 RELEASE WEBINAR TIPS AGENDA. Westchester County HMIS a project of the Continuum of Care Partnership

HMIS REQUIRED UNIVERSAL DATA ELEMENTS

DESTINATION Which of the following most closely matches where the client will be staying right after leaving this project?

Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)

Updated 01/22/2019 ID 24, Page 1 of 5

Continuum of Care (CoC) and Emergency Solutions Grant Program (ESG) 2015 Policy Manual

HMIS Data Standards: HMIS Data. Dictionary. Released May, 2014 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Volume 2

2017 Point in Time Count

Ending Homelessness in Alameda County Strategic Plan Update

NOTES. Step 2: choose the correct city if 2 or more cities share the same ZIP Code.

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. Fairfax County, Fairfax City and Falls Church Cities

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. District of Columbia

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. Arlington County

SuperNOFA FY2012 Performance Measures Cheat Sheet

Gloucester County s 2017 Point-In-Time Count of the Homeless

Summary and Analysis of the Interim ESG Rule December 2011

Santa Barbara County HMIS Data Quality Plan

Counts! Bergen County s 2017 Point-In-Time Count of the Homeless

TOOL OVERVIEW. FY2019 CoC Program Competition Renewal Project Scoring Tool

FY 2017 TX BoS CoC Review, Score, and Ranking Procedures and Reallocation Process for HUD Continuum of Care Program Funds

The Role of HUD s Homeless and Mainstream Housing Programs in Ending Homelessness. Jennifer Ho Ann Marie Oliva Marcy Thompson

2009 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR)

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Idaho Balance of State 10/1/2009-9/30/2010

ESG CAPER Helper Guide

Full DOB reported Approximate or Partial DOB reported

CoC Annual Performance Report (APR) Guide

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Tarrant County/Ft. Worth 10/1/2012-9/30/2013

New Hampshire Continua of Care APR Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) Exit Form for HMIS

Full DOB reported Approximate or Partial DOB reported. Non Hispanic/Non Latino Hispanic/Latino

SHELTER DIVERSION ServicePoint Handbook

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HOMELESS ACTION PARTNERSHIP

NAEH Conference. Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program. February 2014

a. Standard policies and procedures for evaluating individuals and families eligibility for assistance under Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG).

National Population Demographics

New Hampshire Continua of Care SGIA Homelessness Prevention (HP) Project Record Creation Intake Entry Services Exit Packet

How to Pull Your APR (Annual Performance Report) to Upload into Sage

PSH Renewal Review & Scoring Document

Joint Office of Homeless Services FY 2018 Proposed Budget

Standards for CoC- and ESG-Funded Rapid Re-Housing Programs in the Metropolitan Denver Continuum of Care

CLARITY HMIS: HUD-CoC PROJECT INTAKE FORM

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) FUNDING

APR Requirements and Data Entry Workflow Review

The 2017 HUD CoC Annual Performance Report (CoC-APR) Training for the Ohio Balance of State and Mahoning CoCs

Administering CoC and ESG Rapid Re-housing Assistance

HMIS Data Standards DATA DICTIONARY

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Louisville/Jefferson County 10/1/2009-9/30/2010

Health Care and Homelessness 2014 Data Linkage Study

Exit Form: Print on Light-Blue Paper

2017 HUD CoC Program Rating and Review Procedure

FY2016 Detroit Continuum of Care (CoC) Funding Announcements Report to Detroit CoC Board January 9, 2017

HUD Annual Performance Report (APR) Programming Specifications

ServicePoint Handbook

The Community Partnership HMIS Data Collection Guide Version 3 - Last Updated October 10, 2018

ESCAMBIA COUNTY EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RAPID REHOUSING AND HOMELESS PREVENTION ACTIVITIES REVISED 7/17/18

HMIS INTAKE - HOPWA. FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAME LAST NAME (and Suffix) Client Refused. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander LIVING SITUATION

Universal Intake Form

HMIS Data Standards DATA DICTIONARY

Before Starting the CoC Application

Transcription:

Summary Report for FL-506 - Tallahassee/Leon County CoC Measure 1: Length of Time Persons Remain Homeless This measures the number of clients active in the report date range across ES, SH (Metric 1.1) and then ES, SH and TH (Metric 1.2) along with their average and median length of time homeless. This includes time homeless during the report date range as well as prior to the report start date, going back no further than October, 1, 2012. Metric 1.1: Change in the average and median length of time persons are homeless in ES and SH projects. Metric 1.2: Change in the average and median length of time persons are homeless in ES, SH, and TH projects. a. This measure is of the client s entry, exit, and bed night dates strictly as entered in the HMIS system. Universe (Persons) Average LOT Homeless Median LOT Homeless Previous FY Current FY 1.1 Persons in ES and SH 2799 61 20 1.2 Persons in ES, SH, and TH 3047 82 26 b. Due to changes in DS Element 3.17, metrics for measure (b) will not be reported in 2016. This measure includes data from each client s Length of Time on Street, in an Emergency Shelter, or Safe Haven (Data Standards element 3.17) response and prepends this answer to the client s entry date effectively extending the client s entry date backward in time. This adjusted entry date is then used in the calculations just as if it were the client s actual entry date. Universe (Persons) Average LOT Homeless Median LOT Homeless Previous FY Current FY 1.1 Persons in ES and SH - - - - - - - - 1.2 Persons in ES, SH, and TH - - - - - - - - 9/6/2016 6:10:41 PM 1

Measure 2: The Extent to which Persons who Exit Homelessness to Permanent Housing Destinations Return to Homelessness This measures clients who exited SO, ES, TH, SH or PH to a permanent housing destination in the date range two years prior to the report date range. Of those clients, the measure reports on how many of them returned to homelessness as indicated in the HMIS for up to two years after their initial exit. Total # of Persons who Exited to a Permanent Housing Destination (2 Years Prior) Returns to Homelessness in Less than 6 Months (0-180 days) Returns to Homelessness from 6 to 12 Months (181-365 days) Returns to Homelessness from 13 to 24 Months (366-730 days) Number of Returns in 2 Years # of Returns % of Returns # of Returns % of Returns # of Returns % of Returns # of Returns % of Returns Exit was from SO 0 0 0 0 0 Exit was from ES 226 25 11% 10 4% 9 4% 44 19% Exit was from TH 108 3 3% 6 6% 10 9% 19 18% Exit was from SH 0 0 0 0 0 Exit was from PH 238 5 2% 8 3% 10 4% 23 10% TOTAL Returns to Homelessness 572 33 6% 24 4% 29 5% 86 15% 9/6/2016 6:10:41 PM 2

Measure 3: Number of Homeless Persons Metric 3.1 Change in PIT Counts This measures the change in PIT counts of sheltered and unsheltered homeless person as reported on the PIT (not from HMIS). Previous FY PIT Count 2015 PIT Count Difference Universe: Total PIT Count of sheltered and unsheltered persons 805 863 58 Emergency Shelter Total 307 320 13 Safe Haven Total 0 0 0 Transitional Housing Total 310 326 16 Total Sheltered Count 617 646 29 Unsheltered Count 188 217 29 Metric 3.2 Change in Annual Counts This measures the change in annual counts of sheltered homeless persons in HMIS. Universe: Unduplicated Total sheltered homeless persons 3092 Emergency Shelter Total 2837 Safe Haven Total 0 Transitional Housing Total 319 Measure 4: Employment and Income Growth for Homeless Persons in CoC Program-funded Projects Metric 4.1 Change in earned income for adult system stayers during the reporting period Universe: Number of adults (system stayers) 109 Number of adults with increased earned income 0 Percentage of adults who increased earned income 0% 9/6/2016 6:10:41 PM 3

Metric 4.2 Change in non-employment cash income for adult system stayers during the reporting period Universe: Number of adults (system stayers) 109 Number of adults with increased non-employment cash income 0 Percentage of adults who increased non-employment cash income 0% Metric 4.3 Change in total income for adult system stayers during the reporting period Universe: Number of adults (system stayers) 109 Number of adults with increased total income 0 Percentage of adults who increased total income 0% Metric 4.4 Change in earned income for adult system leavers Universe: Number of adults who exited (system leavers) 26 Number of adults who exited with increased earned income 1 Percentage of adults who increased earned income 4% Metric 4.5 Change in non-employment cash income for adult system leavers Universe: Number of adults who exited (system leavers) 26 Number of adults who exited with increased non-employment cash income 11 Percentage of adults who increased non-employment cash income 42% Metric 4.6 Change in total income for adult system leavers Universe: Number of adults who exited (system leavers) 26 Number of adults who exited with increased total income 12 Percentage of adults who increased total income 46% 9/6/2016 6:10:41 PM 4

Measure 5: Number of persons who become homeless for the 1st time Metric 5.1 Change in the number of persons entering ES, SH, and TH projects with no prior enrollments in HMIS Universe: Person with entries into ES, SH or TH during the reporting period. Of persons above, count those who were in ES, SH, TH or any PH within 24 months prior to their entry during the reporting year. Of persons above, count those who did not have entries in ES, SH, TH or PH in the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons experiencing homelessness for the first time) 2946 609 2337 Metric 5.2 Change in the number of persons entering ES, SH, TH, and PH projects with no prior enrollments in HMIS Universe: Person with entries into ES, SH, TH or PH during the reporting period. Of persons above, count those who were in ES, SH, TH or any PH within 24 months prior to their entry during the reporting year. Of persons above, count those who did not have entries in ES, SH, TH or PH in the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons experiencing homelessness for the first time.) 3283 716 2567 Measure 6: Homeless Prevention and Housing Placement of Persons de ined by category 3 of HUD s Homeless De inition in CoC Programfunded Projects This Measure is not applicable to CoCs in 2016. 9/6/2016 6:10:41 PM 5

Measure 7: Successful Placement from Street Outreach and Successful Placement in or Retention of Permanent Housing Metric 7a.1 Change in exits to permanent housing destinations Universe: Persons who exit Street Outreach 139 Of persons above, those who exited to temporary & some institutional destinations Of the persons above, those who exited to permanent housing destinations 3 61 % Successful exits 46% Metric 7b.1 Change in exits to permanent housing destinations Universe: Persons in ES, SH, TH and PH-RRH who exited 2779 Of the persons above, those who exited to permanent housing destinations 934 % Successful exits 34% Metric 7b.2 Change in exit to or retention of permanent housing Universe: Persons in all PH projects except PH-RRH 490 Of persons above, those who remained in applicable PH projects and those who exited to permanent housing destinations 412 % Successful exits/retention 84% 9/6/2016 6:10:41 PM 6