Does Inflation Targeting Anchor Long-Run Inflation Expectations?

Similar documents
Output: The Demand for Goods and Services

MONETARY POLICY IN MEXICO. Monetary Policy in Emerging Markets OECD and CCBS/Bank of England February 28, 2007

Forecasting and Monetary Policy Analysis in Emerging Economies: The case of India (preliminary)

The Death of the Phillips Curve?

a. If Y is 1,000, M is 100, and the growth rate of nominal money is 1 percent, what must i and P be?

International transmission of shocks:

This specification describes the models that are used to forecast

Lecture 23: Forward Market Bias & the Carry Trade

Macroeconomics II A dynamic approach to short run economic fluctuations. The DAD/DAS model.

The macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy in Greece

Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell Midterm Winter 2011

Spring 2011 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison

On the Impact of Inflation and Exchange Rate on Conditional Stock Market Volatility: A Re-Assessment

Finance Solutions to Problem Set #6: Demand Estimation and Forecasting

Stylized fact: high cyclical correlation of monetary aggregates and output

UCLA Department of Economics Fall PhD. Qualifying Exam in Macroeconomic Theory

Empirical analysis on China money multiplier

Macroeconomics II THE AD-AS MODEL. A Road Map

Unemployment and Phillips curve

Aggregate Demand Aggregate Supply 1 Y. f P

Documentation: Philadelphia Fed's Real-Time Data Set for Macroeconomists First-, Second-, and Third-Release Values

Two ways to we learn the model

Non-Traded Goods and Real Exchange Rate Volatility in a Two-Country DSGE Model

Final Exam Answers Exchange Rate Economics

Macroeconomics. Typical macro questions (I) Typical macro questions (II) Methodology of macroeconomics. Tasks carried out by macroeconomists

Yield Curve Construction and Medium-Term Hedging in Countries with Underdeveloped Financial Markets

Econ 546 Lecture 4. The Basic New Keynesian Model Michael Devereux January 2011

MA Advanced Macro, 2016 (Karl Whelan) 1

STATIONERY REQUIREMENTS SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 20 Page booklet List of statistical formulae New Cambridge Elementary Statistical Tables

Inflation expectations, adaptive learning and optimal monetary policy

Solow and the States: A Panel Data Approach *

San Francisco State University ECON 560 Summer 2018 Problem set 3 Due Monday, July 23

Bank of Japan Review. Performance of Core Indicators of Japan s Consumer Price Index. November Introduction 2015-E-7

The Relationship between Money Demand and Interest Rates: An Empirical Investigation in Sri Lanka

Chapter 7 Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy in a Small Open Economy

Optimal monetary policy

CHAPTER CHAPTER18. Openness in Goods. and Financial Markets. Openness in Goods, and Financial Markets. Openness in Goods,

Estimating Earnings Trend Using Unobserved Components Framework

Taylor Rules for Sweden s Monetary Policy Committee *

Is Low Responsiveness of Income Tax Functions to Sectoral Output an Answer to Sri Lanka s Declining Tax Revenue Ratio?

Information in the term structure for the conditional volatility of one year bond returns

Monetary policy and multiple equilibria in a cash-in-advance economy

Exam 1. Econ520. Spring 2017

Inflation Targeting Through Short Term Interest Rate: Australian Experience

MONETARY POLICY AND LONG TERM INTEREST RATES IN GERMANY *

Economics 301 Fall Name. Answer all questions. Each sub-question is worth 7 points (except 4d).

Section 4 The Exchange Rate in the Long Run

FORECASTING WITH A LINEX LOSS: A MONTE CARLO STUDY

How does Loan-to-Value Policy Strengthen Banks Resilience to Property Price Shocks: Evidence from Hong Kong

A Screen for Fraudulent Return Smoothing in the Hedge Fund Industry

Wealth Effects (Plural) and U.S. Consumer Spending *

Establishing Credibility: Evolving Perceptions of the European Central Bank

The forecasts-based instrument rule and decision making. How closely interlinked? The case of Sweden

Inventory Investment. Investment Decision and Expected Profit. Lecture 5

IMPACTS OF FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES MARKET ON OIL PRICE VOLATILITY. Istemi Berk Department of Economics Izmir University of Economics

Department of Economics Master Thesis February Rule-based Monetary Policy for Developing Countries, Evidence from Developed Countries

The Global Factor in Neutral Policy Rates

Exchange Rate Models Are Not as Bad as You Think

Do market-based inflation expectations matter for interest rate decisions? 1

Output Growth and Inflation Across Space and Time

Affine Term Structure Pricing with Bond Supply As Factors

The IS Curve and the Transmission of Monetary Policy : Is there a Puzzle? *

Non-Stationary Processes: Part IV. ARCH(m) (Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity) Models

Discussion of Cook and Devereux: Sharing the Burden: International Policy Cooperation. Gernot Müller

The event-study activity puzzle

Monetary Policy Rules and Inflation Targets in Emerging Economies: Evidence for Mexico and Israel

Volume 29, Issue 2. An Empirical Analysis of the Money Demand Function in India

Introduction. Enterprises and background. chapter

Real Exchange Rate Adjustment In and Out of the Eurozone. Martin Berka Michael B. Devereux Charles Engel

Proposed changes to the compilation of zone aggregates for monetary aggregates and other variables in the OECD Main Economic Indicators publication

External balance assessment:

Taylor Rules and the Euro

CHAPTER CHAPTER26. Fiscal Policy: A Summing Up. Prepared by: Fernando Quijano and Yvonn Quijano

2. Quantity and price measures in macroeconomic statistics 2.1. Long-run deflation? As typical price indexes, Figure 2-1 depicts the GDP deflator,

Stock Market Behaviour Around Profit Warning Announcements

BUDGET ECONOMIC AND FISCAL POSITION REPORT

Econometric modelling of inbound tourist expenditure in South Africa

Aid, Policies, and Growth

Real and Nominal Equilibrium Yield Curves with Endogenous Inflation: A Quantitative Assessment

Mathematical methods for finance (preparatory course) Simple numerical examples on bond basics

Economic Growth Continued: From Solow to Ramsey

The Relationship between Wage and Inflation: Case of Slovenia and Selected Central and Eastern European Countries

An enduring question in macroeconomics: does monetary policy have any important effects on the real (i.e, real GDP, consumption, etc) economy?

Macroeconomic Surprises and International Financial Market Returns

Juan Paez-Farrell Cardiff University. Abstract

The Financial and Macroeconomic Effects of the OMT Announcements

SIMPLE DSGE MODELS OF MONEY DEMAND: PART I OCTOBER 14, 2014

Volatility and Hedging Errors

Demand for Money in Dollarized, In- transition Economy: The Case of Vietnam. Watanabe Shinichi & Pham Thai Binh. Outline

ECONOMETRICS OF THE FORWARD PREMIUM PUZZLE

TAX SMOOTHING: TESTS ON INDONESIAN DATA

Public Spending and the Macroeconomy: Evidence from Developing and Developed Countries

Risk Premium and Central Bank Intervention. Pınar Özlü

The Recovery of Mexican Investment after the Tequila Crisis: Basic Economics or "Confidence" Effects?

The Effect of a Discount Rate on Price Change Behavior: An Empirical Analysis. Robert Stretcher 1. and. Hiranya K Nath 2. February 2004 (Preliminary)

Monetary Policy Shocks: What Have We Learned and to What End? Christiano, Eichenbaum and Evans Handbook of Macroeconomics

Noisy Macroeconomic Announcements, Monetary Policy, and Asset Prices *

National saving and Fiscal Policy in South Africa: an Empirical Analysis. by Lumengo Bonga-Bonga University of Johannesburg

Market and Information Economics

Unconventional Monetary Policy and the Dollar: Conventional Signs, Unconventional Magnitudes

Transcription:

Does Inflaion Targeing Anchor Long-Run Inflaion Expecaions? Evidence from Long-Term Bond Yields in he Unied Saes, Unied Kingdom, and Sweden Refe S. Gürkaynak, Andrew T. Levin, and Eric T. Swanson Bilken Universiy, Federal Reserve Board, and Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Summary Long-erm ineres raes in he U.S. move a grea deal - no jus uncondiionally, bu condiionally (in response o economic news) This behavior is inconsisen wih sandard macroeconomic models in which he seady sae is consan over ime and known by all agens Long-erm ineres raes in he U.K. and Sweden (boh inflaion argeers) generally do no respond o economic news - bu U.K. behaves similar o U.S. prior o Bank of England gaining independence from Treasury/Parliamen in 997-98 All of our empirical evidence can be explained by changes in long-erm inflaion expecaions in he U.S. (and greaer anchoring in U.K., Sweden)

Ouline of Talk Review basic ideas from Gurkaynak, Sack, Swanson (25):. Macro Model Implicaions a. seady sae b. excess sensiiviy of long-erm ineres raes 2. Empirical Mehodology a. forward raes b. macroeconomic, moneary policy surprises This paper:. Compare U.S., U.K., Sweden a. compare inflaion argeers (U.K. pos-998, Sweden) o non-inflaion argeers (U.S., U.K. pre-997) 2. Compare sensiiviy of nominal raes, real raes, inflaion compensaion

A Benchmark Model (GSS 25) π π ε γ π μ π μ π y L A E + + + = + ) ( ) ( y y E i y L A y E y ε π β μ μ + + = + + ) ( ) ( ) ( Clarida-Gali-Gerler New Keynesian specificaion: μ = Rudebusch Hybrid New Keynesian specificaion: μ =.3 Close he model wih a Taylor-ype Rule : [ ] i i c by a c i ε π + + + + = ) ( ) (

Figure : Impulse Response Funcions for Two New Keynesian Models percen.5 Ineres Rae Response o a percen Inflaion Shock Clarida Gali Gerler Rudebusch.5 2 3 4 5 6 Ineres Rae Response o a percen Oupu Shock.5 percen.5.5 2 3 4 5 6 Ineres Rae Response o a percen Ineres Rae Shock percen.5.5 2 3 4 5 6 Time (quarers)

Figure : Ineres Rae Impulse Responses in Two Benchmark DSGE Macroeconomic Models percen.6.4.2 Ineres Rae Response o percen Oupu Demand Shock CEE model (U.S.) ALLV model (Sweden).2 5 5 2 25 3 35 4 45 5.5 Ineres Rae Response o percen Inflaion Cos Push Shock percen.5.5 5 5 2 25 3 35 4 45 5.5 Ineres Rae Response o percen Moneary Policy Shock percen.5.5 5 5 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 Quarers

Empirical Mehodology Regress ineres rae responses in narrow (-day) windows on macroeconomic daa releases and moneary policy announcemens on hose same days Noe: ) use forward ineres raes (raher han erm raes) e.g., ( + fwd ) = ( + r ) 9o 9 ( + r9 ) 2) use surprise componen of macroeconomic daa release (or moneary policy announcemen)

Macroeconomic daa release (or moneary policy announcemen) ex ane forecas measure surprise componen of announcemen and financial marke response

Table : Responses of Forward Raes o Economic News (99-22) ---Ending yr. ahead--- --- Ending 5 yrs. ahead--- ---Ending yrs. ahead-- Coef. Sd. Err. Coef. Sd. Err. Coef. Sd. Err. Macroeconomic Daa Releases Capaciy Uilizaion.36.33***.26.57**.8.6 Consumer Confidence 2..4*** 2.88.56***.97.54*** CPI (Core).67.42***.8.6***.9.66* Employmen Cos Index 3.43.89*** 4.42.3*** 3.73.93*** GDP (Advance) 4.39.42*** 4.2 2.9* 3.76.82** Iniial Claims -.83.24*** -.79.29*** -.59.27** Leading Indicaors.95.34***.6.57.55.58 NAPM 3..5*** 3.29.54***.53.63** New Home Sales.8.39***.65.54***.92.5* Non-farm Payrolls 5..57*** 3.48.9***.88.97* PPI (Core).39.45.22.56**.46.5*** Reail Sales 2.97.72*** 2.62.3**.93.92** Unemploymen Rae -.76.5*** -.77.73.4.66 Moneary Policy Surprises.47.*** -.4.4 -.6.7** Huber-Whie sandard errors. *** indicaes significance a he % level, ** a he 5% level, and * a he % level. The esimaed coefficien indicaes he basispoin response of he one-year forward rae per sandard deviaion of he macroeconomic variable and per basis-poin surprise in moneary policy announcemen. Regresssions include consan erms ha are no shown in he able.

Figure 3: Response of Forward Raes o Macroeconomic Surprises Response of forward raes 4 2 3 5 7 9 3 5 Years ahead Cons. Confidence Response of forward raes 6 4 2 3 5 7 9 3 5 Years ahead Reail Sales Response of forward raes 6 4 2 3 5 7 9 3 5 Years ahead NAPM (ISM) Response of forward raes.5.5 Response of forward raes 8 6 4 2 Response of forward raes 2 2 2 3 5 7 9 3 5 Years ahead Iniial Claims 3 5 7 9 3 5 Years ahead Nonfarm Payrolls 4 3 5 7 9 3 5 Years ahead Unemploymen 8 4 3 Response of forward raes 6 4 2 3 5 7 9 3 5 Years ahead Emp. Cos Ind. Response of forward raes 3 2 3 5 7 9 3 5 Years ahead Core CPI Response of forward raes 2 3 5 7 9 3 5 Years ahead Core PPI

Table : Responses of Forward Raes o Economic News (99-22) ---Ending yr. ahead--- --- Ending 5 yrs. ahead--- ---Ending yrs. ahead-- Coef. Sd. Err. Coef. Sd. Err. Coef. Sd. Err. Macroeconomic Daa Releases Capaciy Uilizaion.36.33***.26.57**.8.6 Consumer Confidence 2..4*** 2.88.56***.97.54*** CPI (Core).67.42***.8.6***.9.66* Employmen Cos Index 3.43.89*** 4.42.3*** 3.73.93*** GDP (Advance) 4.39.42*** 4.2 2.9* 3.76.82** Iniial Claims -.83.24*** -.79.29*** -.59.27** Leading Indicaors.95.34***.6.57.55.58 NAPM 3..5*** 3.29.54***.53.63** New Home Sales.8.39***.65.54***.92.5* Non-farm Payrolls 5..57*** 3.48.9***.88.97* PPI (Core).39.45.22.56**.46.5*** Reail Sales 2.97.72*** 2.62.3**.93.92** Unemploymen Rae -.76.5*** -.77.73.4.66 Moneary Policy Surprises.47.*** -.4.4 -.6.7** Huber-Whie sandard errors. *** indicaes significance a he % level, ** a he 5% level, and * a he % level. The esimaed coefficien indicaes he basispoin response of he one-year forward rae per sandard deviaion of he macroeconomic variable and per basis-poin surprise in moneary policy announcemen. Regresssions include consan erms ha are no shown in he able.

Figure 4: Response of Forward Raes o Moneary Policy Surprises Response of forward raes.5.5 3 5 7 9 3 5 Years ahead

Figure 5: Ten-year-ahead Forward Rae and Moneary Policy Surprises Jan Response of year ahead forward rae 2 Apr Jul92 Dec9 Dec98 Aug9 Apr94 Feb94 Apr92 Sep96 Oc99 May98 Sep94Jul94 Feb9 Oc9Feb95 May Nov98 Feb92 Mar95 Jul96 Feb97 Jun May2 Jan9 Dec94 Sep92 May97 Jan96 Mar93 Mar2 Jul98 Aug95 Dec99 Jul9 Oc92 May96 Sep97 Dec Nov96 Feb98 May9Dec Nov9 Nov Oc9 Mar9 Jan2 Dec92 Aug98 Nov92 Oc Aug99 Aug92 Nov93 Sep95 Nov95 Nov99 Mar Dec9 Aug96 Jun99 Oc98 Jul9 Oc Sep9 Nov97 Aug Mar Feb9 Jul97 Aug97 Dec97 Dec96 Feb93 May95 Mar98 Aug Sep2 Aug93 Feb99 Apr92Mar97 Dec95 May93 Dec2 Jul9 Mar96 Jul93 Mar9 Jan May99 Jul95 Sep93 Nov Mar99 Mar94May92 May9 Dec9 Nov2 Feb Aug2 May Jun2 Sep98Jun Aug9 Nov9 Dec93 Nov94 Aug94 May94 3 4 2 2 Moneary policy surprise

Table 2: Response of STRIPS-based Forward Raes o Economic News ---Ending 5 yrs. Ahead--- ---Ending yrs. Ahead--- Coef. Sd. Err. Coef. Sd. Err. Macroeconomic Daa Releases Capaciy Uilizaion 2.5.9**.37.79* Consumer Confidence 3.82.77**.6.63* CPI (Core) 2.86.22**.75.6* Employmen Cos Index 3.76.7** 3.92.22*** GDP (Advance) 5.66 2.48** 5.4 2.69* Iniial Claims -.29.46*** -.23.5 Leading Indicaors 2.2.3.6.8 NAPM 5.23.7*** 2.73.8*** New Home Sales.86.9.3.7* Non-farm Payrolls 3.5.85***.93.8* PPI (Core) -.6.87.27.63** Reail Sales 5.24.49*** 2.5.4* Unemploymen Rae -.98.89**..9 Moneary Policy Surprises.2.5 -.3.8***

Summary of Empirical Observaions Far-ahead forward raes: ) exhibi economically and saisically significan responses o economic news 2) move in same direcion as oupu and inflaion surprises 3) move in opposie direcion o moneary policy surprises

Possible Explanaions According o Fisher s Equaion: i * = r * + π * The N-year-ahead forward rae saisfies (for large enough N): fwd = NoN r * + π * + ρ +

Possible Explanaions According o Fisher s Equaion: i * = r * + π * The N-year-ahead forward rae saisfies (for large enough N): fwd = NoN r * + π * + ρ + Noe: Changes in r* alone are no sufficien o explain empirical findings

Possible Explanaions According o Fisher s Equaion: i * = r * + π * The N-year-ahead forward rae saisfies (for large enough N): fwd = NoN r * + π * + ρ + Noe: Changes in r* alone are no sufficien o explain empirical findings Changes in ρ alone are no sufficien o explain empirical findings

Possible Explanaions According o Fisher s Equaion: i * = r * + π * The N-year-ahead forward rae saisfies (for large enough N): fwd = NoN r * + π * + ρ + Noe: Changes in r* alone are no sufficien o explain empirical findings Changes in ρ alone are no sufficien o explain empirical findings Bu changes in π* alone are sufficien o explain all empirical findings

Model wih Time-varying π* π = μ E π + + ( μ) A ( L) π + γ y + π ε π y = E y + + ( μ) Ay ( L) y β ( i Eπ + μ ) + ε y * i i = ( c) π + a( π π ) + by + ci + ε π = π + θ( π π ) + ε * * * π*

Impulse Responses for Rudebusch Model wih Time-varying π* (Perfec Informaion)

Model wih Time-varying π* and Imperfec Informaion π = μ E π + + ( μ) A ( L) π + γ y + π ε π y = E y + + ( μ) Ay ( L) y β ( i Eπ + μ ) + ε y * i i = ( c) π + a( π π ) + by + ci + ε π = π + θ( π π ) + ε * * * π* ˆ π = ˆ π + θ( π ˆ π ) κ( i iˆ ) * * *

Expeced Impulse Responses for Rudebusch Model wih Time-varying π* (Imperfec Informaion)

Acual Impulse Responses for Rudebusch Model wih Time-varying π* (Imperfec Informaion)

Summary of Analysis for he U.S. Forward nominal ineres raes respond significanly o economic news Changes in r* alone no sufficien o explain empirical findings Changes in risk premium alone have a hard ime explaining empirical findings (e.g., cyclicaliy goes wrong way) Changes in π* alone are sufficien o explain all empirical findings Imperfec informaion in privae secor no necessary, bu increases magniude, inuiiveness of effecs of changes in π*

Comparing he U.S., U.K., and Sweden (GLS 26). U.K.: inflaion argeer since Ocober 992 (hough Bank of England no independen pre-997) Sweden: inflaion argeer since January 993 U.S.: informal commimen o price sabiliy 2. U.S., U.K., and Sweden have all issued inflaion-indexed bonds - compare forward nominal raes, real raes, and inflaion compensaion U.S.: TIPS since January 997 (forward raes since 998) U.K.: inflaion-indexed bonds since a leas mid-98s Sweden: inflaion-indexed bonds since 994 (forward raes since 996) Relaively shor sample, bu daily bond yield daa, frequen release of imporan macro saisics yield abou observaions per counry

Table : U.S. Forward Rae Responses o Economic News (998-25) -year Forward -year Forward -year Forward -year Nominal Rae Real Rae Inflaion Compensaion Nominal Rae ending in yrs ending in yrs ending in yrs Capaciy Uilizaion.57** (2.76).98 (.68).46 (.74).52 (.94) Consumer Confidence.46** (2.89).62 (.99).9 (.47).43 (.94) Core Consumer Price Index.98 (.5).8 (.74) -.24 (-.57).42* (2.3) real GDP (advance) 2.7* (2.5) 2.7* (2.22).3 (.52).77* (2.6) Iniial Jobless Claims -.3** (-3.79) -.73* (-2.53) -.2 (-.32) -.5* (-2.) NAPM/ISM Manufacuring 2.28** (2.65) 2.98** (4.27).5** (3.52).48* (2.55) New Home Sales.53 (.36).5* (2.38) -.27 (-.98).42** (3.47) Nonfarm Payrolls 4.44** (7.3).84* (2.26).32** (3.46).52 (.83) Reail Sales (ex auos).69** (2.68).44 (.7).56 (.48).88 (.45) Unemploymen Rae -.97 (-.47).78 (.79).89 (.36) -. (-.5) Moneary Policy.23* (2.2) -.2 (-.43). (.3) -.2 (-.43) # Observaions 97 97 97 97 R 2.4.6.4.4 Join es p-value.**.**.5**.2**

Table 3 U.K. Forward Rae Responses o Economic News, pre-bank of England Independence (993-April 997) Average Earnings real GDP (preliminary) Manufacuring Producion Producer Price Index core Reail Price Index Reail Sales Moneary Policy -year Nominal Rae 3.23** (3.33).75 (.68).76 (.88) 2.3** (3.2) 2.39** (3.9) 2.7** (2.98).67** (5.73) -year Forward Nominal Rae ending in yrs.69 (.82) 2.36* (2.4) -.27 (-.2) 2.98** (2.95) 3.2** (3.7).32 (.3) -.54** (-3.9) -year Forward Real Rae ending in yrs.55 (.72).55 (.7) -.6 (-.76).76* (2.3).62 (.88).5 (.7).6 (.27) -year Forward Inflaion Compensaion ending in yrs.5 (.2).8* (2.2).33 (.29) 2.22* (2.6) 2.6** (3.8) -.9 (-.24) -.6** (-5.99) # Observaions 237 237 237 237 R 2.35.8.7.2 Join es p-value.**.**.3**.**

Table 4 U.K. Forward Rae Responses o Economic News, pos-bank of England Independence (July 998-25) Average Earnings real GDP (preliminary) Manufacuring Producion Producer Price Index core Reail Price Index Reail Sales Moneary Policy -year Nominal Rae.8** (4.2) 2.4** (4.2).26** (3.9).2 (.55) 2.6** (4.83).58** (3.92).72** (5.96) -year Forward Nominal Rae ending in yrs -.38 (-.5) -.53 (-.47).59 (.8).22 (.58) -.89 (-.84) -.8* (-2.5) -.2 (-.92) -year Forward Real Rae ending in yrs -.2 (-.53) -.3 (-.9).63** (2.69).44 (.88) -.3 (-.53).9 (.34). (.2) -year Forward Inflaion Compensaion ending in yrs -.26 (-.94) -.49 (-.54) -.4 (-.9) -.22 (-.63) -.76 (-.95) -.8** (-2.75) -.3 (-.) # Observaions 48 48 48 48 R 2.24.2.2.3 Join es p-value.**.9.23.5

Table 5 Swedish Forward Rae Responses o Domesic Economic News (996-25) Consumer Price Index core Consumer Price Index real GDP (preliminary) Indusrial Producion Producer Price Index Reail Sales Unemploymen Moneary Policy -year Nominal Rae.94* (2.55) 2.72** (4.26).79 (.7) -.4 (-.24).63 (.83) -.49 (-.72) -.26 (-.67).72** (3.62) -year Forward Nominal Rae ending in yrs. (.25) -.68 (-.7).72 (.2) -.7 (-.3) -.47 (-.4).26 (.49) -.42 (-.93).25 (.56) -year Forward Real Rae ending in yrs.6 (.64) -.36 (-.96).43 (.94) -.4 (-.4) -.23 (-.) -.39 (-.93) -.37 (-.57).3 (.63) -year Forward Inflaion Compensaion ending in yrs.85 (.3) -.33 (-.37).29 (.45) -.67 (-.55) -.24 (-.76).65 (.2) -.4 (-.).23 (.48) # Observaions 54 54 54 54 R 2.2.2.2. Join es p-value.**.337.34.42

(a) GDP Surprises 2 Unied Saes 2 Unied Kingdom (993 997) response in basis poins 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 Sweden 2 Unied Kingdom (998 25) response in basis poins 2 2 2 surprise in sandard deviaions 2 2 2 3 surprise in sandard deviaions

(b) Inflaion Surprises response in basis poins 25 2 5 5 5 Unied Saes 5 3 2 2 3 2 Unied Kingdom (993 997) 2 3 2 2 3 2 Sweden 2 Unied Kingdom (998 25) response in basis poins 2 3 2 2 3 surprise in sandard deviaions 2 2 2 3 surprise in sandard deviaions

(c) Moneary Policy Surprises Unied Saes Unied Kingdom (993 997) response in basis poins 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 3 2 2 4 Sweden Unied Kingdom (998 25) response in basis poins 2 2 2 2 2 2 surprise in basis poins 2 2 surprise in basis poins

(a) Far-Ahead Forward Nominal Raes 5 3 Sweden Unied Kingdom Unied Saes percen 9 7 5 3 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 2 2 22 23 24 25

(b) Far-Ahead Forward Inflaion Compensaion 6.5 5.5 4.5 percen 3.5 2.5.5.5 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 2 2 22 23 24 25

Long-Term Inflaion Expecaions from SPF 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 98 98 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 99 99 99 992 992 993 993 994 994 995 995 996 996 997 997 998 998 999 999 2 2 2 2 22 22 23

Conclusions ) In he U.S., far-ahead forward nominal raes and inflaion compensaion respond srongly o economic news 2) All of our empirical findings are consisen wih changes in π* 3) Sandard macro models impose an incorrec resricion: consan π* 4) A credible inflaion arge seems o reduce long-erm ineres rae sensiiviy, as in he U.K., Sweden Caveas: Forward raes in he U.K., Sweden are sill fairly volaile uncondiionally - bu perhaps less so han in he U.S. Inflaion argeing is no a silver bulle credibiliy, commimen required - even hen, some uncondiional volailiy remains