ARIZONA BALANCE OF STATE

Similar documents
NORTHERN IDAHO. County Community Data Profile. Vantage Point 2015: 12 th District Community Indicators Project Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

WASHINGTON COUNTY, UTAH

WESTERN COASTAL ALASKA

KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO

MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA

DAVIS COUNTY, UTAH. County Community Data Profile

KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH, ALASKA

WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA

PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. County Community Data Profile

JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON

SOLANO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

NAVAJO COUNTY, ARIZONA

IMPERIAL COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

EL DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

STANISLAUS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

LINN COUNTY, OREGON. County Community Data Profile

APACHE COUNTY, ARIZONA

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON

What does your Community look like and how is it changing?

In Baltimore City today, 20% of households live in poverty, but more than half of the

35% 26% 57% 51% PROFILE. CIty of durham: Assets & opportunity ProfILe. key highlights. ABoUt the ProfILe ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY

10% 21% 37% 24% 71% 10% PROFILE ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY KEY HIGHLIGHTS ABOUT THE PROFILE ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY PROFILE: NEW ORLEANS

36% 50% 11% 59% 35% PROFILE ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY PROFILE: CHARLOTTE KEY HIGHLIGHTS ABOUT THE PROFILE ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY

39% 22% 56% 49% 35% 60% PROFILE. Assets & opportunity ProfILe: winston-salem ANd forsyth CoUNtY. KeY HIgHLIgHts. AboUt the ProfILe

Kansas City Regional Health Assessment

THE COMMUNITY ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF MINING

LAKE FOREST NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

Small Area Health Insurance Estimates from the Census Bureau: 2008 and 2009

EASTWOOD-LONG RUN NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

GERMANTOWN-PARISTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

SOUTH LOUISVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

SHELBY PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

Understanding Poverty Measures Used to Assess Economic Well-Being in California

CHEROKEE-SENECA NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

31% 41% 11% 50% 18% PROFILE ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY PROFILE: SAN FRANCISCO KEY HIGHLIGHTS ABOUT THE PROFILE ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY

PORTLAND NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

Presented by: Shayna Olesiuk, Regional Manager, FDIC Division of Insurance and Research (415)

Urban Action Agenda Community Profiles COVER TO GO HERE. City of Beacon

OLD LOUISVILLE-LIMERICK (OLD LOU-LMK) NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

Urban Action Agenda Community Profiles COVER TO GO HERE. City of Beacon

Populations at Risk. Selected Geographies: Ellsworth County, KS. Benchmark Geography: U.S. Report Date: April 4, 2018

39% 22% 56% 49% 35% 60% PROFILE. key highlights. About the Profile ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY

27% 42% 51% 16% 51% 19% PROFILE. Assets & opportunity ProfILe: PortLANd. key highlights. ABoUt the ProfILe ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY

City of Edinburgh Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

Reducing Child Poverty

Aberdeen City Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

South Lanarkshire Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

Reducing Child Poverty

North Lanarkshire Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

Mortality Improvement Trends and Assumption Setting

Dumfries & Galloway Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

Stockport (Local Authority)

Shetland Islands Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

West Lothian Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

Inverclyde Health and Wellbeing Profiles key indicators and overview

QUALITY of LIFE. in Hawai i Report. Center on the Family University of Hawai`i. Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism

Poverty in the United States in 2014: In Brief

45% 42% 1 IN 4 2 IN 5 CONSUMERS IN DALLAS COUNTY HAVE PRIME CREDIT SCORES DALLAS. Assets and Opportunity in Dallas, TX. Data Highlights SAVINGS ASSETS

Social and Economic Determinants of Household Food Insecurity in the United States and Canada

Memo. County Officials From: CSA Staff Date: May 5, 2017 Subject: County Revenue & Expenditure Projections for FY

Tyler Area Economic Overview

Homelessness Analytics Initiative Methodology Last Updated: 5/3/2013

Town Profiles: Demographic, Economic, and Housing Statistics for De Smet City and Wall Town, SOuth Dakota

Savannah :: Chatham. August rd Edition COMMUNITY INDICATORS DATABASE COUNTY CHATHAM. produced by the Armstrong Public Service Center

Application for Waiver of Court Fees

IS SOUTH JERSEY GETTING ITS FAIR SHARE OF PUBLIC GOODS?

Economic Impact of the Arizona Mining Industry. Arizona Mining Association 916 W. Adams Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007

SB 17 Testimony: Committee on Commerce, Labor, and Energy

Small Area Estimates Produced by the U.S. Federal Government: Methods and Issues

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

Health Care and Texas:

ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

2017 Regional Indicators Summary

2018 Economic Indicators Report

ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Stockport (Local Authority)

LiveWell Columbia Project Community Assessment Snapshot

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

In contrast to its neighbors and to Washington County as a whole the population of Addison grew by 8.5% from 1990 to 2000.

SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

FY 2015 BUDGET REVIEW

Economic Overview York County, South Carolina. February 14, 2018

National Health Interview Survey Early Release Program

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators Arizona. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP


Measuring Suburban Poverty: Concepts and Data Sources Hofstra University September 26, 2013

APPENDIX 6: CENSUS DATA BURLINGTON, VERMONT

Emily De Maria Senior Director of Programs, Capital Area Food Bank Board Member, RAISE Texas

Utah s Long Run Demographic Trends: Evolving Community Contexts

STATE OUTCOME & POLICY REPORT OUTCOME RANK POLICIES ADOPTED

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

An Overview of the New Supplemental Poverty Measure

Community Needs Assessment Update. NEMCSA Early Childhood Services Prepared by: Kristen Walcheski Director of Program Operations 10/21/18

Commonwealth of Kentucky Overview of Kentucky HEALTH. All information based on Kentucky HEALTH Waiver proposal. Information is subject to change.

Katahdin Region Socioeconomic Indicators Katahdin Region

Local Business Profile All Sectors - Fairfield city, Ohio. Contents. What will I find in this report? My Customers

Transcription:

ARIZONA BALANCE OF STATE County Community Data Profile Vantage Point 2015: 12 th District Community Indicators Project Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Project Contact: Gabriella Chiarenza gabriella.chiarenza@sf.frb.org Includes data for Gila County, Graham County, Greenlee County, La Paz County, and Santa Cruz County with comparative data for the United States and Arizona 1

Social and Demographic Data Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 09-13 (five year set), DP02, of total households (Note: family households include a householder and one or more people in the same household who are related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption.) 2

Source: ACS 09-13, DP02, of total family households 3

Source: ACS 09-13, DP02, of population 25 yrs and older 4

Source: ACS 09-13, DP02, of population 25 yrs and older 5

Source: ACS 09-13, DP02, of civilian population 18 yrs and older 6

Source: ACS 09-13, DP02, of total civilian noninstitutionalized population 7

Source: ACS 09-13, DP02, of population 5 yrs and older 8

Source: ACS 09-13, B02001, of total population 9

Source: ACS 09-13, B03003, of total population 10

Employment Data Source: ACS 09-13, DP03, of population 16 years and older 11

Source: ACS 09-13, DP03, of civilian labor force 12

Source: ACS 09-13, DP03, of civilian employed pop 16 years and older 13

Source: ACS 09-13, S0801, of workers age 16 and older who do not work at home 14

Financial Stability Data Source: ACS 09-13, DP03, of total households 15

Source: ACS 09-13, DP03, of total population 16

Source: ACS 09-13, DP03, of total households (Note: SNAP is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps) 17

Source: CFED, Local Data Center Mapping Tool, 2014 (Note: asset poor households are those without sufficient net worth total assets minus total liabilities to subsist at the poverty level for three months in the absence of income; liquid asset poor households are those without sufficient liquid assets money in bank accounts, stocks, mutual funds, and retirement accounts to subsist at the poverty level for three months in the absence of income.) 18

Source: CFED, Local Data Center Mapping Tool, 2014 (Note: unbanked households are those without a checking or savings account; and underbanked households are those that have a checking and/or savings account but also used alternative financial services in the past 12 months.) 19

Housing Data Source: ACS 09-13, DP02, of population 1 year and older 20

Source: ACS 09-13, DP04, of total housing units 21

Source: ACS 09-13, DP04, of total housing units 22

Source: ACS 09-13, DP04, of occupied housing units 23

Source: ACS 09-13, DP04, of occupied housing units 24

Source: ACS 09-13, DP04, of owner- / renter-occupied households (Note: A household is considered to have a housing cost burden if it is paying 30 percent or more of its income on housing costs, including rent, utilities, mortgage payments, and insurance) 25

Health Data Gila County Graham County Greenlee County La Paz County Santa Cruz County Average self-reported poor mental health days per month 5.5 4.3 3.7 5.2 2.9 Percent of children born with low birthweight 9% 8% 7% 6% 8% Percent of adults who smoke 24% 16% 20% 19% 17% Percent of adults who are obese 26% 34% 34% 31% 20% Percent of adults who regularly drink heavily or binge drink alcohol 15% 14% 18% 20% 17% Proportion of driving deaths with alcohol involvement 28% 34% 44% 24% 17% Births to teenagers within the past year per 1,000 females age 15-19 82 61 70 79 56 Ratio of population to primary care providers 1,436:1 1,955:1 2,869:1 2,042:1 2,980:1 Ratio of population to dentists 2,044:1 1,782:1 4,401:1 2,535:1 3,942:1 Ratio of population to mental health care providers 3,543:1 4,677:1 8,802:1 1,690:1 3,942:1 Percent of population potentially exposed to drinking water violations 18% 0% 3% 4% 3% Percent of population with diabetes 11% 11% 9% 13% 6% Percent of households experiencing food insecurity 18% 18% 18% 17% 22% Homicide deaths per 100,000 population 10 4 N/A 7 3 Source: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJ), County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, 2014 26