BRAIN-be ( ) BELGIAN RESEARCH ACTION THROUGH INTERDISCIPLINARY NETWORKS

Similar documents
9351/15 AF/cb 1 DG G 3 C

L 347/174 Official Journal of the European Union

PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENT NO.2 REPORTING TEMPLATES & E-TOOL

2 nd INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION of the EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (FRA)

The ERC in "Horizon Europe" Th. Papazoglou HoU ERCEA/A1

ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme Operation Specification Final

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 22 November 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0384 (COD) PE-CONS 68/13

Guidelines for the AF DSP call for proposals

Council conclusions on the review of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region

Full Proposal Application Form

WORKSHOP MANUAL FINAL Strengthening the uptake of EU funds for Natura 2000 (ENV.B.3/SER/2012/002)

Project Selection Criteria Transnational Cooperation Programme Interreg Balkan Mediterranean

ANNEX. to the COMMISSION DECISION

3 rd Call for Project Proposals

Commission proposal for Horizon Europe. #HorizonEU THE NEXT EU RESEARCH & INNOVATION PROGRAMME ( ) Jean-Eric Paquet. Research and Innovation

Economic and Social Council

URBACT II PROGRAMME MANUAL. (Technical Working Document)

Loss and Damage at the UNFCCC

CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS PAPER PREPARED BY THE TASK GROUP CO-CHAIRS

URBACT III Programme Manual

EU science policy and instruments. Richard Burger Science Counsellor Delegation of the European Commission to Russia 01 October 2009

I Introduction 1. II Core Guiding Principles 2-3. III The APR Processes 3-9. Responsibilities of the Participating Countries 9-14

URBACT II PROGRAMME MANUAL

Item 11 of the Agenda The ESSnet projects: the way forward Theme 6.10.

BIOSURF. (BIOmethane SUstainable and Renewable Fuel) Project Handbook (D1.1) Loriana PAOLUCCI & Stefano PROIETTI (ISIS)

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Proposal Template (Technical Annex) ECSEL Innovation Actions (IA) ECSEL Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) Calls 2017

Bilateral Guideline. EEA and Norwegian Financial Mechanisms

APPROACHES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE POST-2020 GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK

Greece: Towards a National Roadmap for Research Infrastructures

L 201/58 Official Journal of the European Union

Evaluation and Monitoring of European Research Framework Programmes

The Sustainable Insurance Forum

Executive Summary The Chal enge - Lives Are at Stake The JPIAMR The key to turn the tide of AMR

PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENT NO.1 REPORTING PROCEDURES AND MONITORING INDICATORS

with UNDP for the Republic of Congo 12 May 2016 NDA Strengthening & Country Programming

Quality requirements and contents

ANNEX to the Commission Decision C(2018)1514 of

Strategy for Resource Mobilization in Support of the Achievement of the Three Objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity

Danube Transnational Programme

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

EOS infosession. 14th of December Dr. Arnaud Goolaerts & Dr. ir. Isabelle Verbaeys

UNEP/OzL.Pro.30/4/Add.1/Rev.1. United Nations Environment Programme

IMI2 PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

Benin 27 August 2015

JOB DESCRIPTION. TBC within Asia region Asia Regional Office International/TBD 2 years (with possible extension) Head of Programmes

75 working days spread over 4 months with possibility of extension 1. BACKGROUND

STATUTE OF THE EDUCATION REFORM INITIATIVE OF SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE (ERI SEE) Article 1

EU Framework Programme 9

INTERACT III Communication Strategy

Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

ANNEX 14 of the Commission Implementing Decision on the 2015 Annual Action programme for the Partnership Instrument. Action Fiche for Public Diplomacy

Administrative, Financial and Operational Aspects of Project Management

EU support to nutrients R&I. Pavel MISIGA Research and Innovation European Commission

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 77/77

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

P2P and support to Joint Programming under Horizon Dr Jörg Niehoff Head of Sector Joint Programming DG Research & Innovation

SCOTTISH FUNDING COUNCIL CAPITAL PROJECTS DECISION POINT PROCESS

Presidency Team. Ministry of Education and Science. Yanita ZHERKOVA Head of Department, Science Directorate

Action Plan for Pons Danubii EGTC

Article 185 of the TFEU Main features. Ministry for Education, University and Research Department for University, AFAM and Research

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Handbook. CEWARN Rapid Response Fund (RRF)

Funding opportunities

INTERACT III Draft Cooperation Programme

PART 1: DANUBE TRANSNATIONAL PROGRAMME

Call title: FP7-SCIENCE-IN-SOCIETY

EU framework programme processes

Suggested elements for the post-2015 framework for disaster risk reduction

Intergovernmental Council for the Information For All Programme. Second Meeting of the Bureau

SELECTION CRITERIA. for applications submitted to the INTERREG V-A Austria-Hungary Programme

Operating Agreement S4C. Draft for consultation August 2012

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

GPFI Terms of Reference

14613/15 AD/cs 1 DGG 2B

Proposed workplan and budget for the financial period

Gouvernance et Emergence de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines au Cambodge GEReSH-CAM

Research Centres Formation, Monitoring & Review Guidelines. Research Centres Task Group (RCTG) Research & Post Graduate Studies Committee (RPGSC)

DAC-code Sector Public Sector Policy and Administrative Management

Mongolia: Developing an Information System for Development Policy and Planning

The approved ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. ESPON ECP Meeting 9-10 December 2015 in Luxembourg

RESEARCH TRAINING NETWORKS

Interreg Europe Programme Manual

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. on the feasibility of a network of smaller credit rating agencies

EU-funded research. FP7 Tomorrow s answers start today. EUROPEAN COMMISSION - Research DG

EU public consultation on INTERREG EUROPE 10 January 2014

PARIS, 11 August 2009 Original: English

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Amended proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Guideline for strengthened bilateral relations. EEA and Norway Grants

European Heritage Label. Culture

EVALUATION AND FITNESS CHECK (FC) ROADMAP

ANNEX 15 of the Commission Implementing Decision on the 2015 Annual Action programme for the Partnership Instrument

FUNDING STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GLOBAL PLAN OF ACTION FOR ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES

Project Title: INFRASTRUCTURE AND INTEGRATED TOOLS FOR PERSONALIZED LEARNING OF READING SKILL

Relationship with UNFCCC and External Bodies

III. modus operandi of Tier 2

Programme Manual

EX-POST EVALUATION OF THE TWO 2016 EUROPEAN CAPITALS OF CULTURE

CONCLUSIONS 1. INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

BRAIN-be (2012-2017) BELGIAN RESEARCH ACTION THROUGH INTERDISCIPLINARY NETWORKS Call for Valorisation Actions Closing date 26 October 2018 at 12AM Information guidelines for applicants BRAIN-be - Call for valorisation Actions 1/9

CONTENTS 1. THE BRAIN-BE RESEARCH PROGRAMME... 3 2. SCOPE OF THE CALL FOR VALORISATION ACTIONS... 4 3. GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING THE ACTION SUBMISSION FORM... 6 3.1 INFORMATION ON THE APPLICANT... 6 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION... 6 3.2.2 OBJECTIVES, COLLABORATIVE NETWORK, IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN... 6 3.2.3 BUDGET, STARTING DATE AND TIMING... 6 4. PROCEDURES... 7 4.1 HOW TO ANSWER TO THIS CALL?... 7 4.2 E-INFORMATION SESSION... 7 4.2 EVALUATION AND SELECTION... 7 4.2.1 SELECTION PROCEDURE... 7 4.2.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA... 8 4.3 ORDER LETTER... 8 5. CONTACTS... 9 BRAIN-be - Call for valorisation Actions 2/9

1. THE BRAIN-be RESEARCH PROGRAMME On 5 October 2012, the Council of Ministers approved the launch of the first phase (2012-2017) of a recurrent framework programme for research, entitled Belgian Research Action through Interdisciplinary Networks (BRAIN-be). Through the funding of research projects based on scientific excellence and European and international anchorage, this framework programme allows the federal departments scientific knowledge needs to be met as well as supporting the scientific potential of the Federal Scientific Institutions 1 (FSI). The strategic objectives underlying the BRAIN-be programme, are to: - promote a coherent scientific policy within the FSI, and thereby to support and reinforce scientific excellence; - facilitate access to the scientific potential, infrastructure and collections available within the FSIs; - align the research potential with societal needs; - supply the scientific knowledge necessary for the preparation, implementation and evaluation of federal policies/strategies, particularly those related to topics involving multiple departments; - provide the scientific support necessary for the development of a Belgian position within various international forums for policy development; - develop and reach a critical mass for research on topics considered as priority areas in order to reinforce the impact of the federal research; - stimulate cooperation within the Belgian scientific community; - align with the European and international research agendas and to encourage Belgian participation in transnational and international research activities; - provide scientists with a framework allowing them to take up their role in scientific watch and to anticipate issues related to the priority areas of the programme; - promote systemic, multi/interdisciplinary and integrative approaches; - create added value by strengthening the complementarity and synergies between the activities of BELSPO (including contributions to the international infrastructure and organisations); - meet the obligations in terms of research stemming from international agreements; - develop interfaces with potential users of research achievements. The framework programme is structured around six thematic axes: 1. Ecosystems, biodiversity, evolution 2. Geosystems, universe and climate 3. Cultural, historical and scientific heritage, 4. Federal public strategies 5. Major societal challenges 6. Management of collections Bearing in mind the priorities of the thematic axes, the framework programme enables participation in transnational programmes, such as the ERA-NETs and the Joint Programming Initiatives (JPI). For more information about the programme and the various thematic areas, please see www.belspo.be/brain-be. 1 the acronym FSI covers the institutions as defined in the Royal Decree of 30 October 1996 BRAIN-be - Call for valorisation Actions 3/9

2. SCOPE OF THE CALL FOR VALORISATION ACTIONS The first phase of the BRAIN-be research programme (2012-2017) has enabled the funding of 171 research projects through the launch of 5 successive calls. A large majority of these projects are still on-going. To better achieve the strategic objectives of the programme, the current Valorisation Action call is launched to enable promoters of past and on-going BRAIN-be projects to valorise their research and maximise its impact well beyond the project itself. This can be realised by reaching out to a wider user community of researchers, of policy-makers and/or of the society at large. Considering the diversity of the 171 funded projects, this call fosters a bottom-up approach in which the BRAIN-be promoters have the choice of any type of Valorisation Action (further referred to as the "Action") providing it complies with the following criteria: It shall set-up external collaboration(s) intended to open the BRAIN-be project to potential users and/or to link up the project with other (BELSPO or other national/european/international) research activities; It shall clearly define objectives and an expected measurable impact in order to demonstrate the added value of the Action compared to the current situation; It shall describe the tools, tasks, approaches to be implemented, including a precise calendar and budget. The Actions exclude the pursuit of research activities as such and go beyond valorisation activities foreseen in the research contract. The criteria are detailed below, with non-exhaustive examples for illustration purposes. Who is eligible to submit an Action? All 171 BRAIN-be projects can be valorised via this call, no matter if they are finished or still ongoing, in network or led by a single promoter (pioneer projects). The Action can take different configurations: Composed and carried out by a single BRAIN-be promoter; Composed and carried out by a network of BRAIN-be promoters (from the same or different projects). Even though an Action is composed by a network of BRAIN-be promoters, it has to be submitted by only one BRAIN-be promoter (referred to as the applicant) who will coordinate the Action, receive the BELSPO funding and, if applicable, distribute the allocated budget to other involved Action partners via a specific internal collaboration agreement. What can be valorised? The valorisation Action can concern either the whole of (a) BRAIN-be project(s), or parts of it/them (intermediate) results, (by-) products... External collaborations Valorisation in the context of this call means engaging with potential users of the outcome(s) of (a) BRAIN-be project(s). Considering the diversity of BRAIN-be projects, such collaborations can take many forms. BRAIN-be - Call for valorisation Actions 4/9

As an example, the Action could form a network with: Scientists from other BELSPO projects: from BRAIN-be (e.g. on a thematic basis), from other BELSPO programmes; Scientists from projects funded via other sources (FWO, FNRS, the European Commission, COST, other international initiatives...) Users outside the academic sector (field organisations, policy-makers, the private sector...). External collaborations consist of collaborations with the users' community outside the Action network. Expenses made by these external partners (e.g. ad hoc tasks/inputs related to the Action, transport costs, meeting attendance fees) could, if necessary, be refunded by the Action coordinator via the operation budget or via subcontracting. Action objective Setting up a collaborative network is not an Action objective in itself but a tool to achieve clearly stated Action objectives that aim at creating an added value to the BRAIN-be project(s) with respect to the current situation. The expected added value should be measurable (through impact or "situational" indicators) and clearly defined in the application. How the Action objectives are defined and its added value measured is open to ideas from the applicants. One can think of gathering a larger community of researchers around (a) BRAIN-be project(s) to share good practices, disseminate scientific and expertise knowledge, promote transdisciplinary research, edit policy briefs, publish books, discuss implementation guidelines for decision-makers, produce a thematic research agenda, organise a summer school for young researchers, promote the use of datasets or a specific instrument or a methodology by a larger number of users or a diverse scientific community... Collaborations could also be set up with field organisations or policy makers with the objective of implementing or testing a set of scientific results and policy recommendations that were generated in a BRAIN-be project or by a cluster of projects in a given topic of research... Impact could be measured by the effective uptake, use, implementation of generated data, instruments, methodologies, recommendations... by the wider user community. The sustainability of a network, i.e. its possible capacity to maintain activities after the BELSPO funding has run out should be reflected in the Action. Action implementation An Action will require tools and/or approaches to be effective and achieve its objectives. For example, setting up networks, web interfaces or fora, platforms, measures to promote mobility of researchers or stakeholders' involvement, meetings, site visits and conferences, workshops, living labs... are all tools and approaches through which the Action's objectives can be achieved. Tasks, timing and budget The applicant shall provide a description of tasks - and their distribution amongst the Action partners if applicable - and a timing of activities. BRAIN-be - Call for valorisation Actions 5/9

The duration of a valorisation Action can span over a maximum of 24 months for a maximum budget of 20.000. This budget is allocated to the applicant and shall cover all expenses considered necessary for successfully implementing the Action: manpower, operation costs, subcontracting. The total budget of this call is 300.000 : 100.000 charged on the 2018 budget (selected Actions should therefore start end 2018) and 200.000 charged on the 2019 budget (selected Actions to start in spring 2019). 3. GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING THE ACTION SUBMISSION FORM Please read these instructions carefully before completing the submission form. 3.1 INFORMATION ON THE APPLICANT Coordinates of the applicant and where appropriate other BRAIN-be Action partners. 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION 3.2.2 OBJECTIVES, COLLABORATIVE NETWORK, IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN In this section, the Action should be detailed by addressing the following points: What will be the valorisation focus with respect to the concerned BRAIN-be project(s)? What is/are the Action objective(s) to be achieved? What is the expected impact of the Action and how can this be measured? What is the added value of this Action with respect to the current situation? How do the foreseen Action valorisation activities link with the ones included in the BRAINbe project(s)' research contract(s) and what is the added value of the proposed Action in this respect? What are the tools and approaches that will be put in place and how will they be implemented to make the Action effective? With which users - outside the Action network partners - do you plan to set up an external collaboration to reach the Action objectives? Letters of intent should be provided in annex from representatives of key targeted users/stakeholders stating their interest to be actively engaged in the Action. How do you envisage the sustainability of the Action? 3.2.3 BUDGET, STARTING DATE AND TIMING Breakdown the budget by category of expenses and provide a justification on each category: Staff (e.g researcher on the BRAIN-be project or recruited specifically for the Action...) Operation costs (e.g. costs for setting up a living lab, per diem and travel costs to participants to a series of workshops...) Subcontracting (e.g. hiring a company that will take care of the logistics of events, IT development...) Indicate your preference for the starting date of your Action: end 2018 or first semester 2019. According to the availability of the budget in 2018 and 2019, BELSPO will decide on the actual Action starting date. BRAIN-be - Call for valorisation Actions 6/9

4. PROCEDURES This paragraph describes the procedures for submitting an Action, the selection procedure and the principal obligations applying to the selected Actions. 4.1 HOW TO ANSWER TO THIS CALL? The applicant is asked to use only the form that is downloadable from the BRAIN-be website (http://www.belspo.be/brain-be). Only Actions that fulfil all the eligibility criteria will be considered (see 4.2.2). The Action must be sent in English and only electronically (Word/Open office and signed copy in pdf format) to the following address: BRAIN_call@belspo.be The original signed documents must be archived by the applicant and can be requested during the procedure. To facilitate the treatment of the Actions it is asked to include in the "subject" of the email "[Acronym Action]" and to rename the file in the format: "[acronym Action] _ [name of applicant] _ [institution applicant]. docx/odt/pdf". The Action must be submitted to BELSPO no later than: 26 October 2018 at 12AM BELSPO will disregard Actions submitted after the above-mentioned closing date and time. A receipt will be sent by email within the three working days after reception of the Action. The forms can be obtained from the BELSPO website at the following address: http://www.belspo.be/brain-be 4.2 E-INFORMATION SESSION Questions in relation to this call can be sent by email to BRAIN_call@belspo.be before 4 October. BELSPO will compile the answers and make them available on the BRAIN-be website. 4.2 EVALUATION AND SELECTION 4.2.1 SELECTION PROCEDURE BRAIN-be - Call for valorisation Actions 7/9

The selection of research Actions will be organised by BELSPO. The selection decision is made by the Minister of Science Policy. 4.2.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA The general evaluation criteria to be taken into consideration by the experts are the following: 1. Eligibility For all Actions submitted, the following criteria are examined: The submission file is complete (all required forms have been completed) The submission file was submitted in electronic format (in Word/Open Office and pdf) The submission file was submitted no later than 26 October 2018, at 12AM The duration of the funding of the Action is maximum 24 months The applicant is/has been a promoter of a BRAIN-be project The maximum budget of 20.000 is not exceeded Only the Actions that meet ALL these criteria will be evaluated. 2. Compliance with the aims of the BRAIN-be programme and content of the present call Is the Action rightly focused on valorisation of research activities and not on extending research? Does the Action not duplicate valorisation activities foreseen in the BRAIN-be research contract? 3. Quality of the Action Is the focus of the Action with respect to the concerned BRAIN-be project well defined? Are the objectives of the Action well thought out and clearly stated? Is the users' community well targeted (composition, type of involvement...)? Is the implementation of the Action coherent with respect to its objectives: management, approaches and tools Is the Action expected to provide added value to the BRAIN-be project(s) and to the current situation? Is the expected Action impact well assessed, measured, feasible and realistic? Is the sustainability of the Action considered beyond the BELSPO support (new financing sources, self-financing, new business model,... )? 4. Tasks, budget, timing Adequacy of tasks and relevance of their distribution in the Action network with respect to the objectives of the Action. Fair and adequate distribution of resources. Adequacy of the timing. 4.3 ORDER LETTER For the Actions selected, an order letter will be drawn up between BELSPO and the applicant s institution. This order letter will comprise a description of the project, administrative obligations and funding modalities. BRAIN-be - Call for valorisation Actions 8/9

5. CONTACTS Further information can be obtained by contacting: BRAIN-BE@belspo.be 02/238 36 71 ou 238 36 46(FR) 02/238 36 78 (NL) BELSPO places great importance on the quality of its service and on improving the way it operates. A special form to handle complaints has been created. The complaint form is available at the following address: http://www.belspo.be/belspo/organisation/complaints_en.stm Complaints submitted anonymously or which are offensive or not related to our organisation will not be processed. BRAIN-be - Call for valorisation Actions 9/9