TOOL OVERVIEW. FY2019 CoC Program Competition Renewal Project Scoring Tool

Similar documents
NY-606/Rockland County CoC Rank & Review - Attachments Checklist

2017 Saratoga-North Country CoC Project Rank & Review Application

Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative 2016 CoC NOFA Evaluation Tool for Renewal Project Applications

COC RANKING For Grant Year 2017

HUD CoC Reviewing, Scoring and Ranking Procedure

FY16 HUD CoC Program Consolidated Application Scoring Criteria Summary June 2016

Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Continuum of Care 2017 Renewal Project Performance Scorecard

PSH Renewal Review & Scoring Document

APR Data: # of Clients: # of Households # of Adults # of Leavers: # of Adult Leavers:

2018 Kentucky Balance of State CoC Expansion Project Scoresheet for RRH and PSH Projects (Approved by KY BoS CoC Advisory Board August 3, 2018)

FY 2017 TX BoS CoC Review, Score, and Ranking Procedures and Reallocation Process for HUD Continuum of Care Program Funds

FY2017 CoC Program Competition Application Score Cards

2017 HUD CoC Program Rating and Review Procedure

Using Data to Make Funding and Reallocation Decisions

Attachment C. Updated March 23 rd, 2018 by EveryOne Home

FY2019 HCCSC SCORING CRITERIA AND SCORE SHEET

Continuum of Care Written Standards for NY- 508 Buffalo, Niagara Falls/Erie, Niagara, Orleans, Genesee, Wyoming Counties CoC

Before Starting the Exhibit 1 Continuum of Care (CoC) Application

The Role of HUD s Homeless and Mainstream Housing Programs in Ending Homelessness. Jennifer Ho Ann Marie Oliva Marcy Thompson

SACRAMENTO HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM: DATA QUALITY PLAN

AGENDA. 1. Welcome and Introductions. 2. Review IRP Meeting Summary from Feb. 7, HUD CoC Program NOFA

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HOMELESS ACTION PARTNERSHIP

Standards for CoC- and ESG-Funded Rapid Re-Housing Programs in the Metropolitan Denver Continuum of Care

1A. Continuum of Care (CoC) Identification

Summary and Analysis of the Interim ESG Rule December 2011

FY 2013 NOFA Planning and Advocacy December 17, 2013

Before Starting the CoC Application

Written Standards for Permanent Supportive Housing

Summary of 3 County CoC SPM Report Data

Continuum of Care (CoC) and Emergency Solutions Grant Program (ESG) 2015 Policy Manual

2018 Performance Management Plan. Ohio Balance of State Continuum of Care Updated January 2018

Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

2017 Point in Time Count

Massachusetts Homelessness Data Warehouse Proposal

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

[HUDX-225] HMIS Data Quality Report Reference Tool

FY2016 Detroit Continuum of Care (CoC) Funding Announcements Report to Detroit CoC Board January 9, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS Applied Survey Research (ASR) All Rights Reserved

City of Tucson Housing and Community Development Department Planning and Development Division

Ending Homelessness in Alameda County Strategic Plan Update

County of Riverside Continuum of Care (CoC)

Counts! Bergen County s 2017 Point-In-Time Count of the Homeless

HUD 2016 System Performance Measures Submission Recap. NYC Coalition on the Continuum of Care October 20, 2017

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT:

2019 Housing Inventory Count (HIC) Guidance Document

1A. Continuum of Care (CoC) Identification

HMIS 320 APR Training

Updated 01/22/2019 ID 24, Page 1 of 5

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2014 Key Performance Indicators

ESG CAPER Helper Guide

HMIS PROGRAMMING SPECIFICATIONS

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - finalized July 1, June 30, 2017

HUD Notice Soliciting Comments on ESG Interim Rule National Alliance to End Homelessness Summary of Notice June 25, 2015

Gloucester County s 2017 Point-In-Time Count of the Homeless

NC ESG Application Form: Regional Application (January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017)

HMIS REQUIRED UNIVERSAL DATA ELEMENTS

Health Care and Homelessness 2014 Data Linkage Study

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2016 Key Performance Indicators

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - Updated July 1, June 30, 2019

Proposed San Francisco Response to Solicitation of Comment on Specific Issues For Emergency Solutions Grant Program Interim Rule

CITY OF OAKLAND EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT DRAFT PY 2011 SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

Administering CoC and ESG Rapid Re-housing Assistance

Project Application Part 7: Budget Information

Action steps for improving funding coordination

Continuum of Care (CoC) Eligible and Ineligible Costs LEASING 24 CFR

Chapter 3: Implementing the CPD Outcome Performance Measurement System

HMIS INTAKE - HOPWA. FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAME LAST NAME (and Suffix) Client Refused. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander LIVING SITUATION

11/15/2011. The Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program: An Introductory Overview. Submitting Questions in the Webinar

PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING (PSH) IN AUSTIN, TEXAS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TCP Issuance Date: August 25, Closing Date: September 26, 2014 Closing Time: 2:00 p.m.

The Community Partnership HMIS Data Collection Guide Version 3 - Last Updated October 10, 2018

Project Application Part 7: Budget Information

THURSTON COUNTY AFFORDABLE & HOMELESS HOUSING PROGRAMS 2012 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL GUIDELINES

HMIS Data Standards DATA DICTIONARY

The Community Partnership How to Run the CoC-APR 2018 Report Version 1 Last Updated December 17, 2018

Joint Office of Homeless Services FY 2018 Proposed Budget

Implementing the HEARTH Act: The Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) program

a. Standard policies and procedures for evaluating individuals and families eligibility for assistance under Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG).

Data Quality Plan Tampa / Hillsborough County Continuum of Care

CoC Annual Performance Report (APR) Guide

RECOMMENDATION #1: PROVIDE MORE HOUSING NAVIGATORS/CASE MANAGERS

Health Care and Homelessness 2014 Data Linkage Study

FY 2018 Budget Proposal Rundown

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

HEARTH Funding Opportunities Task Group Meeting August 9, :30am Via conference call

Government of Alberta, Human Services. Grant Accountability Review of the Calgary Homeless Foundation 2015/16. Calgary, AB: Human Services.

HHS PATH Intake Assessment

APR Requirements and Data Entry Workflow Review

FY2018 Chicago Continuum of Care (CoC) Ranking Policies and Final Ranking Listing. Developed by the Project Prioritization Workgroup

Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)

Missouri Housing Development Commission

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the BYC and SPP

HMIS Data Standards: HMIS Data. Dictionary. Released May, 2014 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Volume 2

CITY OF CHICO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM YEAR APPLICATION

HUD-ESG CAPER User Guide

Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Street Outreach & Emergency Shelters. April 4, 2017

Santa Barbara County HMIS Data Quality Plan

Welcome From DCA. Recovery Act Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program. HPRP Purpose. HPRP Activities. HPRP Eligible Persons

Final Report and Recommendations on Homelessness in Alameda County, California R E S E A RCH REPORT

Transcription:

TOOL OVERVIEW Agency & Project Information (Unscored) Threshold s Administrative Review (Unscored) Scoring & Ranking Team s 1. Agency Experience & Capacity 3 2. Scope of Project 2 3. Project Goals & Objectives 20 4. Community Priorities 10. Budget 10 Scoring & Ranking Team Sub-total 100 Monitoring Score Sub-total Total Page 1

AGENCY & PROJECT INFORMATION Agency Information UNSCORED Project Information UNSCORED 1. Agency Name Agency & Project Information 2. Sub-Recipients Are you applying by yourself or with a sub-recipient? 3. Project Name Expiring grant number (first six digits) 4. Total Project Budget If with a sub-recipient, please identify any expected sub-awards.. Project Type Renewal 6. Component Type (E.g., SSO-CE, SSO, HMIS, SH, TH, Joint TH-RRH, RRH, PSH) 7. Is the project 100% Dedicated to serving chronically homeless, Dedicated PLUS, or other? 8. Number of units, bed count, and total dedicated chronically homeless beds (from HIC and APR data) 9. Project participants by subpopulation (Select up to 3 subpopulations that are verifiable from APR Data) 10. Forms Attached Budget Forms Cash Match Forms and Letters Agency List of Board Members Certificate of Acknowledgement Supportive Services Table Written Policies & Procedures 2

THRESHOLD CRITERIA Unscored 1. Applicant Eligibility Applicant is active CoC participant, including attendance at mandatory trainings and meetings. Neither applicant, nor sub-recipients (if any) are for-profit entities. Agency is on the HUD Code of Conduct List. Application contains valid DUNS number. Application contains valid SAM CAGE code. 2. Participant Eligibility The project will only accept participants that can be documented as eligible for this project s program type based on their housing and disability status. 3. Coordinated Entry Project participates in coordinated entry to the extent possible for the project type. 4. HMIS or Alternative Database Project agrees to enter data for all CoC-funded beds into HMIS or an alternative database for projects serving survivors of domestic violence.. Quarterly Monitoring of Drawdowns & Match Project agrees to monitoring of quarterly drawdown by submitting an eloccs attachment and match documentation. 6. Written Policies & Procedures Project has submitted policies and procedures consistent with minimum HUD requirements. 7. Equal Access/Fair Housing The project provides equal access and fair housing without regard to sexual orientation, gender identity, or local residency status. 8. Is it feasible for the project to be under grant agreement by September 30, 2021? 9. Match Forms and Letters Contains a dated match letter. Match equals 2% of the rental, supportive services, and admin categories. 3

SCORING CRITERIA For purposes of reviewing the draft tool, narrative questions are included below each factor. 1. AGENCY EXPERIENCE & CAPACITY (3 PTS.) 1.A. Experience providing assistance to individuals experiencing homelessness Describe your agency s experience providing assistance to individuals experiencing homelessness. 1.B. Organizational and management structure Describe your agency s organizational and management structure. 1.C. Experience in utilizing federal funds Describe agency s experience in: o Effectively utilizing federal funds and performing the activities proposed in your project application(s) given funding and time limitations; and (2 point) o Leveraging other federal, state, local, and private sector funds. (2 point) Describe how your agency identifies or determines any fees required by participants and any other billing options and accounting practices used. (1 points) 4

1.D. Participation in regional efforts Select which regional efforts your agency participated in during the preceding 12 months (April 2018 to March 2019): (4 point scale: 4 pts = for participation in 4 or more efforts, 3 pts = 3 efforts, 2 pts = 2 efforts, 1 pts = 1 effort, 0 pts = no participation in any efforts) o Project Homeless Connect and/or Family Connect o Homeless Census (PIT) o Mainstream Programs Basic Training (MPBT) Attendee/Presenter o NHA Provider Meeting o Coordinated Entry System Planning Working Group o Southern Nevada Homeless Continuum of Care (SNH CoC) monthly board meetings o SNH CoC Membership o SNH CoC Working Groups participated in 6 or more meetings o Other (with explanation) Explain your agency s level of participation in regional efforts. For each activity specify the contributing effort and the details in depth (i.e., date, time, activity, role, description, etc.) (4 points) 1.E. Compliance with Community & Federal Efforts Specify how this project: o Meets one or more of the action steps in the HELP HOPE HOME Regional Plan to End Homelessness; and o Identify how your project will help to fill one or more of the gaps identified in the 201 Gaps Analysis 8 6 1.F. Past Performance For renewal projects that generate APRs, briefly indicate whether your agency has submitted all APRs on time. (Yes, No with explanation, ) 2

1.G. Commitment to Including Consumers Does the agency have a homeless or formerly homeless person on staff or their board? (1pt) Does the agency have a Consumer Advisory Board? (1pt) Does the agency administer consumer satisfaction surveys or make changes based on results of consumer feedback? (1pt) Does the program involve consumers in designing and operating the program? (1pt) 4 6

2. SCOPE OF PROJECT (2 PTS.) 2.A. Project Description Provide a complete, concise description that addresses the entire scope of the proposed project at full operational capacity. Please include a description of the place(s) where services and housing are provided. 10 2.B. Alignment with Housing First Principles Agency Written Policies & Procedures (8 pts) To what extent do the project s written policies and procedures ensure that participants are not screened out based on the following criteria? (4 pts) o Having too little or no income o Active, or history of, substance use or a substance use disorder o Having a criminal record (with exceptions for state-mandated restrictions) o History of domestic violence (e.g., lack of a protective order, period of separation from abuser, or law enforcement involvement) To what extent do the project s written policies and procedures ensure that participants are not terminated from the program for the following reasons? (4 pts) o Failure to participate in supportive services (with exception for HUDmandated monthly case management meeting for RRH program participants) o Failure to make progress on a service plan o Loss of income or failure to improve income o Being a survivor of domestic violence o Any other activity not covered in a lease agreement typically found in the project s geographic area 10 Describe how the project takes proactive steps to minimize barriers to entry and retention. (2 pts) 7

2.C. Agency Collaborations to provide supportive services Describe agency collaborations with: (3 pts) o Other homeless service providers o Service providers that are not specifically homeless service providers Describe whether project participants will have access to SOAR services. If SOAR services are inapplicable to the project or if the project can use but opts not to use SOAR services due to conflicting existing services or program management for project clients, please explain. (2 pts) 8

3. PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES (2 PTS.) 3A and 3B are for PSH, RRH, and TH/RRH projects. 3C is for SSO-CE projects. For expansion projects, the performance of the existing renewal to be expanded will be used. Keep in mind that outcomes will naturally be lower in a more difficult to serve population with severe needs and vulnerabilities such as persons experiencing chronic homelessness, mental illness, substance use disorders and/or domestic violence survivors. 3.A. Reduce length of homelessness episodes and new and return entries into homelessness. Describe how participants are assisted to obtain and remain in permanent housing. (4 pts) Describe all relevant information that the Scoring & Ranking Team should consider (such as harder to serve populations) in evaluating the following outcomes: (9 pts) 13 PSH: % of persons remaining in permanent housing beyond 6 months SH, TH, RRH, TH-RRH: % of persons exiting SH, TH, or RRH to permanent housing 3.B. Increase jobs, income and self-sufficiency Describe how participants are assisted both to increase their employment and/or income and to maximize their ability to live independently. (4 pts) Please use the V2 to describe all relevant information that the Scoring & Ranking Team should consider (such as serving a harder to serve population) in evaluating the following outcomes: (8 pts) 12 % of increased or sustained employment % of increased or sustained other cash income % of improved education % of increased or sustained mainstream non-cash benefits 4. COMMUNITY PRIORITIES (10 PTS.) 9

4.A. Prioritizing Bed Type Based on Community Priorities are allocated for this factor only if projects meet one of the following CoC funding priorities. Project is DedicatedPLUS (7 pts) Project has 100% Dedicated Chronically Homeless Beds (7 pts) Projects not DedicatedPLUS have o 7-99% chronically homeless dedicated beds ( pts) o 30-74% chronically homeless dedicated beds (3 pts) o 1-29% chronically homeless dedicated beds (1 pt) 4.B. High Performance For FY 2019 SNH CoC has chosen to preserve high performing projects by awarding projects with high compliance and system performance scores as determined through the independent monitoring process with up to an additional 3 points. Projects performing in the top 30% will be allotted the following points: Projects performing in the top 10 th percentile = 3 pts Projects performing in the 20 th percentile = 2 pts Projects performing in the 30 th percentile = 1 pt 7 3 4.C. Reallocation (Bonus) Did the Agency voluntarily reallocate a renewal project? Consider: How much funding was reallocated? What was the project type? Reason for reallocation. (Bonus) 10

. BUDGET (1 PTS.).A. Budget Forms Are the amounts requested per line item appropriate for the project goals and objectives? (4 pts) Are all costs eligible? Do descriptions match project narrative? (4 pts) Are all supportive services identified in the table fully explained in the budget form? (4 pts) Are admin costs less than 10% of total budget? (3 pts) 1 11