The Impact of Credit Counseling on Consumer Outcomes: Evidence from a National Demonstration Program

Similar documents
How House Price Dynamics and Credit Constraints affect the Equity Extraction of Senior Homeowners

The Role of Exponential-Growth Bias and Present Bias in Retirment Saving Decisions

Online Appendix for: Minimum Wages and Consumer Credit: Lisa J. Dettling and Joanne W. Hsu

Jamie Wagner Ph.D. Student University of Nebraska Lincoln

NFCC Envisioning Homeownership Research Survey. Final Report. Prepared by Connie Campbell PhD Stephen Roll PhD Colleen Hernandez

Dissertation. By Stephen Patrick Roll, B.A. Graduate Program in Public Policy and Management. The Ohio State University 2016

September 13, Financial Planning for First Time Homebuyers

Cognitive Constraints on Valuing Annuities. Jeffrey R. Brown Arie Kapteyn Erzo F.P. Luttmer Olivia S. Mitchell

Financial Education. Debt Repayment of Young Adults

Financial Literacy and Financial Behavior among Young Adults: Evidence and Implications

Can Information Change Personal Retirement Savings? Evidence from Social Security Benefits Statement Mailings. Susan Payne Carter William Skimmyhorn

Personalized Information as a Tool to Improve Pension Savings

Snapshots of Financial Coaching. Bank of America & Annie E. Casey Foundation Meeting April 26, 2010

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

Kim Manturuk American Sociological Association Social Psychological Approaches to the Study of Mental Health

BORROWING TO SAVE? UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT

Investment, Human Capital and Growth

The Effects of Student Loans on Long-Term Household Financial Stability

Appendix A. Additional Results

Renters Report Future Home Buying Optimism, While Family Financial Assistance Is Most Available to Populations with Higher Homeownership Rates

Millennial Money Mindset Report

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

Online appendix for W. Kip Viscusi, Joel Huber, and Jason Bell, Assessing Whether There Is a Cancer Premium for the Value of a Statistical Life

Enrollment Type. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Fox Valley

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

Interest Rate Pass-Through: Mortgage Rates, Household Consumption, and Voluntary Deleveraging. Online Appendix

ONLINE APPENDIX. The Vulnerability of Minority Homeowners in the Housing Boom and Bust. Patrick Bayer Fernando Ferreira Stephen L Ross

Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Marathon County. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type

Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Manitowoc. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type

Comparison Group Selection with Rolling Entry in Health Services Research

Import Competition and Household Debt

Web Appendix Figure 1. Operational Steps of Experiment

Credit counseling: a substitute for consumer financial literacy?

What America Is Thinking Access Virginia Fall 2013

Acemoglu, et al (2008) cast doubt on the robustness of the cross-country empirical relationship between income and democracy. They demonstrate that

Public Issues Survey Wave 12

Online Appendix to The Impact of Family Income on Child. Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit.

CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS Data Hypothesis

Loan Aversion in Education: What We Know and What Remains To Be Learned

Saving for Retirement: Household Bargaining and Household Net Worth

Is Debt Good or Bad for a Comfortable Retirement? Exploring the Relationship between Consumer Debt and Retirement Preparedness

institution Top 10 to 20 undergraduate

GENERAL INFORMATION (complete for all programs)

Early Retirement Incentives and Student Achievement. Maria D. Fitzpatrick and Michael F. Lovenheim. Online Appendix

You May Participate in Pre-Filing Bankruptcy Counseling in One of Three Ways

Risk Tolerance Profile of Cash-Value Life Insurance Owners

Gender Differences in the Labor Market Effects of the Dollar

Happy Voters. Exploring the Intersections between Economics and Psychology. Federica Liberini 1, Eugenio Proto 2 Michela Redoano 2.

Student Loans And Credit: An Overview Tanya Tanaro, Manager Higher Education Partnerships, ASA

Random digital dial Results are weighted to be representative of registered voters Sampling Error: +/-4% at the 95% confidence level

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur Millennial Financial Literacy and Fin-tech Use adipiscing elit, aliquam tincidunt dui.

Unlocking the Risk-based Pricing Puzzle: Five Keys to Cutting Credit Card Costs

Mortgage Rates, Household Balance Sheets, and Real Economy

Debt and Financial Vulnerability on the Verge of Retirement

Refund to Savings: Evidence of Tax- Time Saving in a National Randomized Control Trial

Are Americans Saving Optimally for Retirement?

SALARY EQUITY ANALYSIS AT ARL INSTITUTIONS

Prioritizing choice: Perceptions of neighborhood social cohesion for residents in subsidized housing

Internet Appendix for Collateral Shocks and Corporate Employment

How exogenous is exogenous income? A longitudinal study of lottery winners in the UK

What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues February 2016

FIGURE I.1 / Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Unemployment Rates. Year

What America Is Thinking About Energy Issues February 2016 Presented by: Harris Poll

The current study builds on previous research to estimate the regional gap in

United Way Worldwide: MyFreeTaxes Survey November 18-23, Report Date: January 28, 2016

Dakota County CDA Homebuyer Counseling Program Application

Income Inequality and Household Labor: Online Appendicies

HOME SWEET HOME COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Rebuilding our community one day at a time Customer Intake Form

The Affordable Care Act Has Led To Significant Gains In Health Insurance Coverage And Access To Care For Young Adults

ONLINE APPENDIX (NOT FOR PUBLICATION) Appendix A: Appendix Figures and Tables

Volume 35, Issue 1. Effects of Aging on Gender Differences in Financial Markets

Predicting Student Loan Delinquency and Default. Presentation at Canadian Economics Association Annual Conference, Montreal June 1, 2013

Harris Interactive. ACEP Emergency Care Poll

Florida Financial Literacy Initiative - Grant Application

Comparison of OLS and LAD regression techniques for estimating beta

Financial Knowledge, Experience and Learning Preferences: Preliminary Results from a New Survey on Financial Literacy

Executive Summary: Aging in Place: Analyzing the Use of Reverse Mortgages to Preserve Independent Living. Highlights Report of Survey Results

IMPACT OF FINANCIAL COUNSELING ON FINANCIAL STABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE NEW YORK CITY MODEL

FOR ONLINE PUBLICATION ONLY. Supplemental Appendix for:

Migration Responses to Household Income Shocks: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan

The Effects of Increasing the Early Retirement Age on Social Security Claims and Job Exits

Financial Constraints and the Risk-Return Relation. Abstract

Online Appendix: Consumer Bankruptcy and Financial Health

Do Student Loan Borrowers Opportunistically Default? Evidence from Bankruptcy Reform

This document provides additional information on the survey, its respondents, and the variables

Changes over Time in Subjective Retirement Probabilities

Employment Adjustments to Increased Imports: Evidence from a Developing Country

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics and Information Department

What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues January 2015

Is proprietary trading detrimental to retail investors?

CHAPTER V. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

Developing a Risk Group Predictive Model for Korean Students Falling into Bad Debt*

Does FinTech Affect Household Saving Behavior? Findings from a Natural Experiment. Gregor Becker Philadelphia, September 29 th 2017

The effect of household debt on health

Final Exam - section 1. Thursday, December hours, 30 minutes

Name: 1. Use the data from the following table to answer the questions that follow: (10 points)

Internet Appendix. The survey data relies on a sample of Italian clients of a large Italian bank. The survey,

National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics

May 9, Please put ONLY your ID number on the blue books. Three (3) points will be deducted for each time your name appears in a blue book.

Information Use and Attention Deferment in College Student Loan Decisions

Transcription:

The Impact of Credit Counseling on Consumer Outcomes: Evidence from a National Demonstration Program Stephen Roll Stephanie Moulton, PhD

Credit Counseling Overview Reaches two million clients a year Provides three core services Financial Education Individualized Budget Counseling Reviews household income and expenses Develops goals and action plans Debt Management Plans (DMPs) Consolidates payments, improves interest rates, waives fees Supplemental programs contingent on agency Can include financial coaching, additional education, automated reminders, credit builder loans, etc.

Who is served by credit counseling agencies? Distressed target populations Low levels of financial literacy (Disney, Gathergood, & Weber, 2015) Often undergoing shocks (Collins, 2010) Low-income, low savings, problematic borrowing behaviors

What do we know about credit counseling initiatives? Very little empirical work on credit counseling impacts Industry analyses (e.g. Loonin & Plunkett, 2003) Descriptive analyses (Kim, Garman, & Sorhaindo, 2003; Bagwell, 2000) Work on supplemental aspects of credit counseling (e.g. Barron & Staten, 2011) and examining client characteristics (e.g. Disney & Gathergood, 2009) Limited systematic evaluations of credit counseling programs (Elliehausen, Lundquist, & Staten, 2007)

Program Setting Sharpen Your Financial Focus nationwide credit counseling initiative Three-Step Personal Financial Stabilization Program similar to traditional credit counseling programs Targeted and general education Budget counseling Online self-assessment Debt Management Plan enrollment (if qualified) Program began in September 2013. Evaluation runs through February 2015 Reached over 40,000 clients by the end of the evaluation

Data Clients from 13 NFCC agencies (n=8,963) Matched comparison group generated through Coarsened Exact Matching Imbalance bounded prior to matching 10 matching variables 70% match rate Unmatched clients are extremely distressed Credit data for 6,094 counseling clients and 6,005 matched comparison individuals Credit data collected quarterly from August 2013 to February 2015

Summary Statistics for Treatment and Comparison Groups in Coarsened Exact Matching Analysis Counseled Comparison % Difference Matching Variable Mean (St. Dev) Mean (St. Dev) (Treatment/ Control) Balance* Credit Score (Vantage 3.0) 594 597-1% 0.04 (77.1) (80.3) Open Revolving Debt ($) 10,582 10,248 3% 0.02 (15,346) (14,947) Total Installment Debt ($) 20,425 21,113-3% 0.02 (34,647) (44,461) Mortgage Debt ($) 44,021 46,565-5% 0.02 (104,449) (131,740) Number of Bankruptcies 0.30 0.29 3% 0.01 (1.6) (1.6) Age of Oldest Account (Months) 182 183-1% 0.01 (105.4) (109.5) Payments 60 Days Delinquent (Last 12 Months) 0.58 0.59-1% 0.01 (1.6) (1.7) Mortage Payments 90 Days Delinquent (Last 24 Months) 0.11 0.12-8% 0.01 (1.2) (1.4) Balance to Credit Ratio on Revolving Debt 0.52 0.52 1% 0.01 (0.4) (0.4) Observations 6,094 6,005 *Balance is calculated as a function of the absolute difference between the counseled and comparison means, divided by the standard deviation for the full sample. Matching Results Best practices: <0.05=Strongly balanced sample

Motivations for Seeking Counseling Reason For Seeking Counseling # % Reduced Income 4,804 79% Domestic Conflict 390 6% Un/underemployment 1,762 29% Other 2,652 44% Increased Expenses 1,321 22% Costs of death in family 35 1% Creditors increased interest rates 148 2% Increased family size 128 2% Medical/Disability expenses 404 7% Other 606 10% Other Reasons 1,350 22% Bad credit 149 2% Previous bad experience 45 1% Other 1,156 19% n=6,094 credit counseling clients Source: NFCC Administrative Data Respondents could select multiple reasons for seeking counseling

Method Difference-in-differences approach Outcome variables: Debt metrics, credit scores, payment delinquencies Treatment effect estimated using fixed effects panel regression Standard errors clustered on the individual Model: y it = α i + πcounseling it + λquarter t + δ Counseling it Quarter t + β j x it + ε it x it : Post-counseling time-varying controls Bankruptcy, debt charge-offs, foreclosures

Selected Regression Results Sharpen Evaluation Summary Results Key Client Outcomes Sample and Model Revolving Debt ($) Credit Score Counseling Group Change Regression- Adjusted Counseling Impact Counseling Group Change Regression- Adjusted Counseling Impact Full Sample No Controls -5,735-3,637*** 7.9-6.8*** Controlling for Debt Write-Offs -2,654-1,989*** 10.1-6.4*** DMP Clients No Controls -5,486-3,340*** 10.8-5.1*** Controlling for Debt Write-Offs -2,918-2,095*** 13.4-4.4*** Non-DMP Clients No Controls -6,148-4,130*** 3-9.5*** Controlling for Debt Write-Offs -2,228-1,766*** 4.3-10.1*** Credit Risk Profiles 50th Credit Score Percentile at Baseline -3,929-1,973*** 28.2 0.9 25th Credit Score Percentile at Baseline -1,722-526 48 7.5*** * p<0.1; ** p<0.05; *** p<0.01

Delinquent Payments Credit Score Credit Scores and Payment Delinquencies Influenced by Shocks Credit Scores Over Time 620 610 603 600 597 600 590 594 581 581 580 570 607 608 610 611 601 593 597 589 Counseling Impact: -6.8*** 560 Pre-Counseling First Quarter Post-Counseling 2Q Post 3Q Post 4Q Post 5Q Post 6Q Post Counseled Client Outcomes Comparison Outcomes Counseling Impact: -0.01 60-Day Payment Delinquencies Over Time 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.46 0.68 0.89 0.45 0.46 0.44 Pre-Counseling First Quarter Post-Counseling 0.72 0.55 0.46 0.38 0.41 0.40 0.38 0.39 2Q Post 3Q Post 4Q Post 5Q Post 6Q Post Counseled Client Outcomes Comparison Outcomes

Revolving Debt ($) Revolving Debt Over Time 17000 $16,612 $16,400 16000 15000 $16,453 $15,959 $15,421 $15,322 $14,936 $14,661 $14,420 $14,354 14000 13000 $13,532 12000 11000 10000 Pre-Counseling First Quarter Post-Counseling $12,243 $11,399 $10,877 2Q Post 3Q Post 4Q Post 5Q Post 6Q Post Counseled Client Outcomes Comparison Outcomes Counseling Impact: -$3,637***

Total Debt ($) Total Debt Over Time 90000 85000 $84,130 $84,642 $85,866 $85,419 $85,521 $86,551 $86,938 80000 $81,059 $82,245 $80,744 75000 70000 $77,284 $75,185 $73,679 $72,526 65000 60000 55000 50000 Pre-Counseling First Quarter Post-Counseling 2Q Post 3Q Post 4Q Post 5Q Post 6Q Post Counseled Client Outcomes Comparison Outcomes Counseling Impact: -$11,341***

Open Credit Ratio Liquidity Ratio Over Time (for those with debt at baseline) 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.31 0.30 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.39 0.48 0.43 0.51 0.45 0.54 0.46 0.57 0.48 0.20 0.10 0.00 Pre-Counseling First Quarter Post-Counseling 2Q Post 3Q Post 4Q Post 5Q Post 6Q Post Counseled Client Outcomes Comparison Outcomes Counseling Impact: 0.09***

Conclusions Clients are entering the program at a time of substantial financial distress Prior studies observe outcomes at two points in time quarterly focus of data provides additional context around clients financial reality Credit score and delinquency metrics return to normal at the end of the evaluation period, but credit score lags the comparison group In the short- and medium-term, evidence is that credit counseling improves client debt outcomes Reductions in debt and improvements in liquidity Results are robust to controls for debt write-offs and DMP enrollment Extends prior work Improvements present for clients with weaker credit profiles

Future Research Counseling/education programs aimed at specific target groups Student loan holders, female heads of households Using automated reminders to keep clients on track with their goals and obligations Randomized, controlled trial Financial coaching integrated into counseling services

Thank you!

Appendix

Client Characteristics Selected Client Characteristics Mean Gender Male 31% Female 69% Marital Status Single 39% Married or Living with a Partner 39% Race Asian 3% Black 22% White 64% Education Less than High School 3% High School Graduate 30% College Degree or Higher 67% Age 42.8 Average Monthly Income $3,093 Savings $559 n=6,094 credit counseling clients Source: NFCC Administrative Data

Perceptions of Improved Financial Behaviors Survey Responses % Answering Yes Better Manage Money 67% Ordered/Viewed Credit Report 42% Saving Money 45% Paid Late Fees 37% Took Out Payday Loans 5% Improved Overall Confidence 70% Set Financial Goals 68% Pay Debt More Consistently 73% Respondents 777 Source: NFCC Post-Counseling Survey * p<0.1; ** p<0.05; *** p<0.01 20

Post-Counseling Debt Levels Credit Indicator Total Debt Pre- Counseling Quarter First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Fifth Quarter Sixth Quarter 25th Credit Percentile $72,093 $70,733 $68,838 $65,283 $62,390 $59,678 $57,228 All Clients $107,709 $106,787 $104,667 $99,354 $95,836 $93,199 $90,625 Total Revolving Debt 25th Credit Percentile $11,940 $10,778 $8,587 $6,815 $6,078 $5,383 $4,999 All Clients $20,610 $20,071 $18,482 $16,014 $14,310 $13,274 $12,576 Open Revolving Debt 25th Credit Percentile $6,546 $4,284 $3,263 $2,646 $2,392 $2,140 $1,949 All Clients $13,307 $10,694 $8,271 $7,064 $6,475 $6,012 $5,672 n=8,963 Source: Credit Attributes Data 21

Debt Results Summary Model (Standard Errors in Parentheses) 1 2 3 4 Dependent Variable Total Revolving Debt Total Debt Open Revolving Credit Ratio Total Revolving Balance-to- Credit Ratio Counseling Client -3,637.18*** -11,341.00*** 0.04*** -0.04*** (341.88) (1368.07) (0.01) (0.01) Constant 16,532.97*** 82,582.95*** 0.49*** 0.52*** (100.2) (406.35) (0.00) (0.00) R-squared 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.03 Observations (Individuals*Quarters) 84,693 84,693 84,693 84,693 Unique Individuals 12,099 12,099 12,099 12,099 This table presents the results for a fixed effects panel regression with standard errors clustered by observation. The Counseling Client indicator measures the difference in outcomes for counseling clients relative to a matched non-counseled comparison group. Output for the quarter indicators and counseling/quarter interactions is not shown. Full results can be seen in the Appendix. Source: Credit Attributes Data * p<0.1; ** p<0.05; *** p<0.01

Debt Results (for those with debt) Summary Table 20: Differences-in-Differences Analysis - Client Outcomes on Key Debt Indicators (For Those with Debt at Baseline) Model (Standard Errors in Parentheses) 1 2 3 4 Dependent Variable Total Revolving Debt Total Debt Open Revolving Credit Ratio Total Revolving Balance-to-Credit Ratio Counseling Client -4,814.77*** -12,725.78*** 0.09*** -0.09*** (449.98) (1,477.65) (0.01) (0.01) Constant 22,051.75*** 90,989.41*** 0.31*** 0.70*** (131.75) (439.66) (0.00) (0.00) R-squared 0.05 0.01 0.10 0.10 Observations (Individuals*Quarters) 63,105 77,217 63,056 63,105 Unique Individuals 9,015 11,031 9,008 9,015 This table presents the results for a fixed effects panel regression with standard errors clustered by observation. The Counseling Client indicator measures the difference in outcomes for counseling clients relative to a matched non-counseled comparison group. Output for the quarter indicators and counseling/quarter interactions is suppressed. Source: Credit Attributes Data * p<0.1; ** p<0.05; *** p<0.01 23

Debt Results with Controls Model (Standard Errors in Parentheses) 1 2 3 4 Dependent Variable Total Revolving Debt Total Revolving Debt (Had Debt at Baseline) Total Debt Total Debt (Had Debt at Baseline) Counseling Client -1,988.54*** -2,659.47*** -6,604.27*** -7,614.55*** (322.99) (424.72) (1,305.71) (1,410.92) Bankruptcy Post- Baseline -13,972.72*** -16,966.38*** -58,237.28*** -60,858.06*** (1,002.68) (1,183.58) (3,859.80) (3,998.96) Charge-Offs Post- Baseline -5,778.28*** -6,563.97*** -9,852.71*** -9,801.84*** (312.75) (375.06) (841.14) (877.36) Foreclosures Post- Baseline -64,529.61*** -64,555.67*** (11,665.13) (11,739.10) Constant 16,532.97*** 22,051.75*** 82,582.95*** 90,989.41*** (98.36) (128.86) (397.55) (429.51) R-squared 0.08 0.10 0.04 0.05 Observations (Individuals*Quarters) 84,693 63,105 84,693 77,217 Unique Individuals 12,099 9,015 12,099 11,031 24

DMP Debt Outcomes Model (Standard Errors in Parentheses) 1 2 3 4 Dependent Variable Total Revolving Debt Counseling Client (DMP Recommendation) -3,340.09*** -2,095.31*** (366.44) (350.46) Counseling Client (No DMP Recommendation) -4,129.67*** -1,766.30*** (674.14) (629.30) Bankruptcy Post-Baseline -12,061.03*** -16,071.73*** (1,187.47) (1,654.86) Charge-Offs Post-Baseline -5,244.10*** -6,598.26*** (387.07) (516.31) Constant 17,563.18*** 14,818.66*** 17,563.18*** 14,818.66*** (98.46) (212.04) (96.95) (208.00) R-squared 0.05 0.03 0.09 0.07 Observations (Individuals*Quarters) 54,089 33,145 54,089 33,145 Unique Individuals 7,727 4,735 7,727 4,735 25

Credit Outcomes Model (Standard Errors in Parentheses) 1 2 Dependent Variable Credit Score Payments 60 Days Delinquent (Past 6 Months) Counseling Client -6.76*** -0.01 (1.23) (0.03) Constant 595.12*** 0.46*** (0.39) (0.01) R-squared 0.03 0.01 Observations (Individuals*Quarters) 82,859 84,693 Unique Individuals 11,837 12,099 26

Bottom 50 th Credit Percentile Outcomes Model (Standard Errors in Parentheses) 1 2 3 Dependent Variable Total Revolving Debt Credit Score Payments 60 Days Delinquent (Past 6 Months) Counseling Client -1,973.05*** 0.86-0.13** (404.15) (1.82) (0.06) Constant 7,195.09*** 526.27*** 0.96*** (115.89) (0.55) (0.02) R-squared 0.03 0.08 0.02 Observations (Individuals*Quarters) 37,135 36,694 37,135 Unique Individuals 5,305 5,242 5,305 This table presents the results for a fixed effects panel regression with standard errors clustered by observation. The Counseling Client indicator measures the difference in outcomes for counseling clients relative to a matched non-counseled comparison group. Output for the quarter indicators and counseling/quarter interactions is not shown. Full results can be seen in the Appendix. Source: Credit Attributes Data * p<0.1; ** p<0.05; *** p<0.01

Bottom 25 th Credit Percentile Outcomes Model (Standard Errors in Parentheses) 1 2 3 Dependent Variable Total Revolving Debt Credit Score Payments 60 Days Delinquent (Past 6 Months) Counseling Client -526.09 7.49*** -0.17 (355.70) (2.57) (0.10) Constant 3,631.72*** 487.04*** 1.48*** (130.24) (0.74) (0.04) R-squared 0.04 0.16 0.05 Observations (Individuals*Quarters) 18,095 17,906 18,095 Unique Individuals 2,585 2,558 2,585 This table presents the results for a fixed effects panel regression with standard errors clustered by observation. The Counseling Client indicator measures the difference in outcomes for counseling clients relative to a matched non-counseled comparison group. Output for the quarter indicators and counseling/quarter interactions is not shown. Full results can be seen in the Appendix. Source: Credit Attributes Data * p<0.1; ** p<0.05; *** p<0.01

Credit Score Credit Scores for Shocked Clients 620 600 595 580 560 540 520 594 562 541 535 529 551 549 557 556 564 561 571 566 500 480 Pre-Counseling First Quarter Post- Counseling 2Q Post 3Q Post 4Q Post 5Q Post 6Q Post Counseled Client Outcomes Comparison Outcomes 29