COUNTY OF MENDOCINO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Similar documents
Residential Property Owner Handbook. Version February 2017

Jenine Windeshausen Placer County Treasurer Tax Collector California Municipal Treasurer s Association Inn at Squaw Creek April 14, 2016

PACE Program Management. John Maslowski Vice President, Market Development

R - P A C E. Residential Property Assessed Clean Energy: A Primer for State and Local Energy Officials. MARK WOLFE Executive Director June 2017

PACE Program (Property Assessed Clean Energy)

Financing the Home Energy Revolution Renovate America, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA Palm Desert Energy Independence Program

Government and Private Initiatives to Address the Foreclosure Crisis

WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that this resolution is in the best interest and welfare of the residents of the City; and

ABS Research Clearing the Air Addressing Three Misconceptions of PACE

acceleration adjustable rate mortgage amortization amortization table annual percentage rate

SONOMA VALLEY COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (A Component Unit of the County of Sonoma)

Lender Letter LL

Table of Contents. Sample

The Retrofit Revolution: Innovative Financing and Programs to Green Every U.S. Home

Schell-Vista Fire Protection District. Annual Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009

PACE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND GUIDELINES

Short Sales/Foreclosures/REOs

7 YGRENE WORKS PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY FINANCING PROGRAM

Supplementary Materials for

Applied Solutions Case Study- Charlotte County, FL PACE Program January 31 st 2013

Energy Efficiency Fund: A Model for Financing Energy Efficiency Improvements

Internal Audit. Sonoma County. Financial Statement Audit: Rincon Valley Fire Protection District Annual Report

Instructions for Completing the Short Sale Package. Send Ocwen the completed package and supporting documentation

Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul Property Assessed Clean Energy Program (PACE OF MN) ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES

Path to Approval Toolkit An Easy-to-Use Reference Guide for Prospective Fannie Mae Seller/Servicers

Mortgage Terms Glossary

SONOMA VALLEY COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (A Component Unit of the County of Sonoma) Independent Auditor s Reports, Management s Discussion and

which was indicated to be roughly 1.5+ standard deviations from the national average. 3 Id.

Senior Vice President of Public Policy and Industry Relations

A Bill Regular Session, 2013 SENATE BILL 640

James C. Alsop (Signed by James C. Alsop) Acting Administrator Housing and Community Facilities Programs

Cynthia W. Johnston, Housing and Redevelopment Director

Financing Your Climate Action Plan Green California Summit Joe Livaich Regional Director

999 West Street, Rocky Hill, CT Phone: (860) Fax: (860) Website:

County Service Area No. 40 Fire Services Annual Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

NORTHERN SONOMA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006

Guaranteed Discount Mortgage-Backed Certificates (Multifamily Residential Mortgage Loans)

The Federal Reserve s HOEPA Proposal and Subprime Related Legislation by. Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Barnett Sivon & Natter P.C.

Gold Ridge Resource Conservation District Annual Audit Report For the Years Ending June 30, 2009 and 2008

999 West Street, Rocky Hill, CT Phone: (860) Fax: (860) Website:

After-tax APRPlus The APRPlus taking into account the effect of income taxes.

Fannie Mae Reports Net Income of $2.0 Billion and Comprehensive Income of $2.2 Billion for Third Quarter 2015

October 18, Policy Framework for PACE Financing Programs

Chapter 15 Real Estate Financing: Practice

TO: Freddie Mac Sellers and Servicers October 3, 2012

Fannie Mae Reports Third-Quarter 2011 Results

GLOSSARY OF MORTGAGE TERMS

County Service Area No. 40 Fire Services Annual Report. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

New American Funding Attn: Loss Draft Department P.O. Box 1064 Tonawanda, NY [DATE]

Internal Audit. Sonoma Count y. Financial Statement Audit: Roseland Fire Protection District Annual Report. Auditor-Controller-Treasurer-Tax Collector

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Have The Same Short Sale Rules and Policies

Fannie Mae Reports Net Income of $2.8 Billion and Comprehensive Income of $2.8 Billion for First Quarter 2017

[Address of Borrower] [Loan #] [Date] RE: Acknowledgement of Request for Short Sale

Broker. Financing Real Estate. Chapter 12. Copyright Gold Coast Schools 1

FREELAND LENDING does Not have a hard limit of how many loans someone may have: FREELAND LENDING will fund up to 100% of the Purchase Price

November 11, Early Resolution is Inconsistent with the CFPB s Loss Mitigation Requirements

FANNIE MAE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY FINANCING MARKET TRENDS. Presented: 5/23/2016

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION LENDING POLICY

ATTACHMENT #1 Special LF&A Meeting of July 16, "Preventing Foreclosure: Potential Tools for Delawareans"

ELEMENTS OF A WELL-DESIGNED C-PACE STATUTE AND PROGRAM TO ATTRACT PRIVATE CAPITAL AND FOSTER GREATER TRANSACTION VOLUMES JANUARY 16, 2018

Memorandum on Federal Housing Finance Reform ECONOMY & JOBS

Gold Ridge Fire Protection District Annual Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009

Commercial PACE: Program Development & Implementation

SUBJECT: HOME AFFORDABLE MODIFICATION PROGRAM YEAR SIX PAY FOR PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE

2/10/2015 CREDIT FOR SUCCESS TODAY S NEW RISK FACTORS MOBILE BANKING. The new Consumer Financial Protection Act, the ATR Rule (Ability to Repay Rule)

Chapter 23: Maximum Loan Amounts and LTV, TLTV and HTLTV Ratios

FINANCING OPTIONS FOR CONDOMINIUMS WITH PENDING HOA LITIGATION

CITY OF TUSTIN TUSTIN HOUSING AUTHORITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING OWNERSHIP PROGRAMS FACT SHEET (BUYER)

NEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY. Single-Family Mortgage Program Participating Lenders and Participating Originators HFA 311

ALTLOAN CREDIT GUIDELINES

SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

Loan Workout Hierarchy for Fannie Mae Conventional Loans

PURCHASING, LEASING & CONTRACTING POLICY

RESIDENTIAL RESALE/ REFINANCING TITLE RATES AND DISBURSEMENT ESCROW SERVICE FEES

RESIDENTIAL RESALE/ REFINANCING TITLE RATES AND DISBURSEMENT ESCROW SERVICE FEES

Statement of Donald Bisenius Executive Vice President Single Family Credit Guarantee Business Freddie Mac

Financial Incentives for Pre-Disaster Mitigation

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS THE HOME MODIFICATION LOAN PROGRAM

Assistance Program: County of San Diego Homebuyer Downpayment & Closing Cost Assistance (DCCA)/CalHome Code: DCASDDCCA

REFERENCE POOL GLOSSARY

24 CFR Ch. XX ( Edition) APPENDIX C TO PART 3500 INSTRUCTIONS FOR

Assistance Program: City of Los Angeles Low Income Purchase Assistance Program (LIPA) Zero Interest Code: DCALIPADP

Community First Financial Corporation

Another Approach to GSE Reform

If ineligible for the HAMP, is the borrower experiencing a temporary or long-term hardship?

Your Guide to Home Financing

Lesson 12: Real Estate Financing 311

13 DOWNPAYMENT PROGRAMS

Internal Audit. Sonoma County. Auditor Controller Treasurer Tax Collector

C-PACE a Primer for Mortgage Lenders

Shiloh Public Cemetery District Annual Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010

Written for state Housing Finance Agencies (HFAs), this report furthers the work of the Innovations in Manufactured Homes (I M HOME) initiative s

February 5, Dear Secretary Geithner:

RIO ALTO WATER DISTRICT

Hurricane Harvey Reference Guide

Mortgage Underwriting Policy Manual Table of Contents [Sample Client] Table of Contents

Bulletin NUMBER: TO: Freddie Mac Sellers November 15, 2011

Transcription:

DAN HAMBURG Supervisor Fifth District COUNTY OF MENDOCINO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTACT INFORMATION 501 Low Gap Road Room 1010 Ukiah, California 95482 TELEPHONE: (707) 463-4221 FAX: (707) 463-7237 Email: bos@co.mendocino.ca.us Web: www.co.mendocino.ca.us/bos December 6, 2012 Employers Council of Mendocino County Attn: Barbara Reed 597 B South Main Street Ukiah, CA 95482 Dear Ms. Reed: Re: PACE Program Letter Dated November 23, 2012 Thank you for your letter dated November 23, 2012 concerning the County considering the development of a Property Assess Clean Energy (PACE) Program in Mendocino County. Below are responses to your questions in that letter. Questions/Responses: 1. What is the program s statutory authority? Response: The Program s statutory authority is AB 811 or SB 555. 2. Who at the state and federal levels of government is responsible for regulatory oversight of PACE programs? Response: There is no State or Federal agency that is charged with implementation and/or oversight of PACE programs (AB 811 or SB 555). State level legislation allows cities and counties to create districts and it is up to the local jurisdiction to decide if they want to administer in house or hire a 3rd party administrator. a. Are there any new or proposed regulations on the horizon? Response: Currently I am only aware of proposals regarding addressing the federal housing issues relating to FNMA / FMAC residential mortgages. b. Why is the Federal Housing Financing Agency (FHFA) proposing policy restrictions on PACE financing? What were the safety and soundness concerns that FHFA had about PACE when they directed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to not purchase mortgage loans of properties with outstanding PACE obligations? Response: The current ruling from the 9th District Court of Appeals says FHFA did not follow Federal rule making processes and therefore has to go back and do so. The concerns expressed by FHFA may not be enforceable. The court also said jurisdictions and/or property owners who have undertaken PACE programs/liens will NOT be subject to any rule resulting from the process in the future.

Page 2 of 8 December 6, 2012 c. Will PACE interfere with the county s affordable housing goals as it relates to homebuyer loans assisted by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac programs? How many home mortgages do those programs assist? Response: PACE is a voluntary self-assessment so no property owner is being forced to participate (AB 811 Program). The SB 555 program has deemed votes into districts and is not voluntary contractual assessments. No PACE financing can be applied for until the federal issues have been resolved so there is NO impact to affordable housing at this time until and unless the issues are resolved at the federal level (under AB 811). d. What is the guidance on commercial PACE programs? Response: Commercial PACE loans require existing lender lien holder s permission before placing a new PACE loan under the AB 811 program. Under the SB 555 program the lien holder s permission is not required. 3. Is there a state or federal mandate that is requiring the county to adopt this program? Response: There is no State or Federal mandate, this is a voluntary program. 4. What is the program s targeted purpose(s)? Response: The targeted purpose is to increase energy and water conservation investments in Mendocino County that will lower costs for property owners, reduce GHG emissions and provide additional support for local contractors, suppliers and service providers enhancing job retention and creation. 5. Who are the program s clientele? Response: Current AB 811 providers only offer commercial financing. The third party turn key vendor can make the program available to all property owners under the SB 555 model and the law also allows for public building/school financing. The re-payment mechanism for public financing has not been developed yet. Please note that the issue with the FHFA currently restricts participation for homeowners with FHFA mortgages in the AB 811 program but does not in the SB 555 program. 6. What sort of demand analysis forecasting has been done to justify the creation of a PACE program. Response: The County has not performed any demand analysis on this program, however the State would not have developed such a program had there not been a clear need for more financing specifically for energy and water conservation projects and especially in the commercial sector. Should the County opt to enter into a PACE Program the turn key vendor will be able to provide market data.

Page 3 of 8 December 6, 2012 a. What other forms of financing are available to make energy related improvements? Who provides those services and products? Response: Local lenders offer a wide array of products; however, they have been very restrictive in lending following the financial crises and this has made loans to local businesses harder to get. One difference with conventional financing is that credit-based and turn key vendors offer asset-based financing. Under PACE, financing is dependent on equity in property and not personal credit score. b. Who is asking for PACE financing? What is the quantity of and type of services and products they need? Have they been denied financing from conventional sources? Response: Local contractors, suppliers, service providers and businesses have been interested in the development of this program in Mendocino County. Loan sizes range from small to large and many have been denied financing from conventional sources. c. Given the size of the marketplace, will a PACE program be a cost effective and a productive use of County resources? Response: County staff believes the answer is yes. There are no costs to the county and the PACE vendor takes care of all setup and implementation. Some PACE vendors reimburse the County for any costs and staff time to set up the program. The improvements will add to the county s property tax values while lowering energy and water costs for Mendocino County property owners. 7. What are the program s funding sources? Response: Some PACE vendors have their own startup funds, interim loan funds and eventually sell loans to the bond market recovering the interim funds to loan out again. Some PACE vendors have fully funded districts, meaning they have upfront project funds and will eventually aggregate projects and replenish the pool of funding through a secondary market offering. 8. Will this program be limited to the unincorporated area of the County? Response: The County and all four cities have previously passed resolutions supporting the PACE program. If the County chooses to apply this program to the unincorporated areas, it will require approvals from each city to apply to their jurisdiction via an adoption of a resolution. 9. What would the program s organizational structure within the County look like: a. What will be the program s demand on existing county resources? How many county departments/ agencies will be involved? What will be their respective roles and responsibilities?

Page 4 of 8 December 6, 2012 Response: There should be minimal county resources dedicated to this program, as the PACE vendor provides funds for all work to be completed. Turn Key Vendors do come and provide training to local contractors on how the financing works so that the jobs they are working on can get completed. This would be similar to adding a School or Sewer Bond to the county property tax rolls and collecting and paying out. b. Who are the key people to manage this program? Who will be the responsible person in charge? Will this program require new staff? Response: The key people that manage the program would be the Auditor and the Tax Collector as far as the assessments are concerned. There would be no additional staff needed for this program and a member of the County Executive Office will be in charge of the contract management. c. Will the program use the County s loan committee? Response: There are no county funds being utilized for this program and therefore no county loan committee is needed. d. What is the estimated timeline, staffing and budgetary requirement for program setup? Response: Once the County approves proceeding with the PACE Program, it takes approximately six to nine months for the process of securing a PACE vendor, approving the County (and each city) financing authority and establishing the procedures needed to begin the program. As noted above, any County staff time spent on the program set up is reimbursed by the vendor. e. What is the program s net-county cost requirements? Response: There is no increase in any net-county costs for this program. f. Will the startup of this program take a superior position of the administration and management of existing county priorities? Response: The Board would leave the prioritizing of the set up of this program as compared to other County administrative funds to the CEO. g. Who and how will the program be evaluated to see if the program has achieved its intended outcome? Response: Should the Board direct staff to implement a PACE program, the CEO will work with the selected vendor to develop program evaluation criteria and implementation. Some turn key vendors base their success on market penetration rates (i.e., 3% of property over a 5-year contract term). They also can set targets for funding goals once they get further along in their market analysis.

Page 5 of 8 December 6, 2012 10. Do similar sized jurisdictions have this program? Response: Yes. a. How have those programs performed? Response: This varies by location. Berkeley became oversubscribed for their limited funds, Lake County has had a hard time starting up due to the PACE vendor not having access to interim loan funds, Sonoma County and the City of Sacramento have had really positive results from their programs. The County of Sacramento just adopted an SB 555 program. Sonoma County has the most successful program and has funded about $60 million in projects in 3 years. b. What are the staffing and budgetary requirements of those programs? Response: There is no cost to the County and minimal staff time when selecting a turn key vendor style PACE program. The County of Sonoma has an entire division dedicated to this program as the County runs the program in its entirety. 11. Will this program be subject to LAFCO? Response: No. 12. This is an assessment added to a client s property tax bill; if the client does not pay their property tax, is the County General Fund or the Teeter Plan used to guarantee PACE program payments to creditors and/or program operators? Response: If property taxes are not paid, the County proceeds (as it normally would) through the default procedures through the Teeter Plan. When and if the property ends up being sold after five years, the Teeter is reimbursed all of its expenses as well as any penalties for lack of payment of property taxes. a. What is the county s policy and procedures for recovery of delinquent tax payments, interest and penalties? Response: Under California law, after a period of five years from the first year of tax-default, during which time the assessee retains the legal title to the property and has the privilege of redeeming it upon payment of the amount due, the tax collector records a Notice of Power to Sell Tax-Defaulted Property in the Mendocino County Recorder s Office. Once this document is recorded, the tax collector prepares the tax-defaulted property to be sold at public auction. The minimum bid at public auction is the amount of taxes, penalties, interest, and additional costs incurred through the process. b. What is the current balance of the Teeter Plan debt? What is the county s plan to payoff that debt?

Page 6 of 8 December 6, 2012 Response: The balance of the Teeter debt as of June 30, 2012 is $6,537,767. The County plans to pay at least $769,205 annually. 13. What will be the program s lending policies, underwriting standards and control practices? Response: Each turn key vendor has different approaches to this. a. What are the specific statutory requirements governing PACE underwriting? Response: Each jurisdiction determines its own specific program guidelines for loan purposes, amounts and underwriting requirements for example, only allowing up to 10% of the assessed value as a loan amount maximum, only investments in certain energy and water conservation measures, energy audit required for larger commercial projects, etc. b. Who will be responsible for creating and adopting written polices, operating procedures, and control mechanisms that reflect prudent credit practices, subordination requirements, and compliance with applicable regulations? Response: Should the Board direct staff to implement a PACE program, the CEO would work with the selected PACE vendor to determine the County s program policies and procedures. i. Who will be responsible to see if those polices and underwriting standards are followed? Response: The PACE vendor and a representative of the CEO s office will be responsible for monitoring performance. ii. If the County hires an independent contractor to offer products and services to clients on the County s behalf, who will be responsible for interfacing and auditing the contractor s work for compliance with polices and standards? Response: A member of the CEO s office will be in charge of contract management. iii. If the County s independent contractor makes a bad loan, who pays? Response: Currently bad loans are on the property tax roll just as all other assessments. This program is based on 100% Property Owner approved selfassessment. Underwriting standards are universal. Risk for default situations resulting from turn key vendor s financing is very low given the very small bi-annual payment when compared to property taxes as a whole, mortgage payments, and property values. c. What is the minimum supporting credit and financial information requirements? Response: Turn key vendors determine things like mortgage delinquencies, bankruptcies or other bad credit and how they play into potential loans.

Page 7 of 8 December 6, 2012 d. What methodology is used to determine whether the improvements will generate the cash flow to repay the debt? Response: An energy audit shows available savings that can be used to determine loan amount and term. e. What are the requirements for collateral/proposed loan to value limits? Response: Typically this is limited to a percentage (10% typical) of assessed value of the property. f. Is this a financial program of last resort (i.e. was the client denied conventional financing)? Response: No this is not a program of last resort. Loan denials are not required prior to obtaining a PACE loan. This is another option for property owners to improve the efficiency of their buildings and increase property values. g. What is the typical interest rate that this advance will carry? Response: The interest rate is typically 7% to 8% depending on the vendor and the type of program that is created. h. Is a subordination agreement requested to required to be authorized by existing mortgage holders and other lien note holders, including being notarized and recorded in the official county records prior to approving a PACE loan? What happens when an existing mortgage or other lien note holder does not agree in writing to subordinate? Response: This varies depending on which program the County adopts. If the County adopts a program under AB 811 (which is currently only commercial properties), then approval of the lien holder is required. If the County adopted a program under SB 555 (which includes not only commercial but residential as well), then approval from the lien holder is not required. i. Who will be responsible for inspecting and approving the work to authorize the disbursement of funds? Response: The PACE vendor works with local contractors on approving the work performed. Local building permit and inspection requirements are required for each project. Turn key vendors will also employ inspectors on larger projects that require progress payments. j. Who is responsible for loan disbursement? Are these advances, partial or lump sum reimbursements? Who receives the disbursement, the client or the contractor? Response: Loans are disbursed by the PACE vendor and can have progress payments on larger projects. k. If there is a delinquency, is the county responsible for making the loan payment to the financing sources (e.g. bondholder)? What source of funding would the county use to make that payment?

Page 8 of 8 December 6, 2012 Response: Please see the County s response to question number 12. The turn key vendor and its investors take all of the financing risk. l. If there is a loss who pays? Response: Please see the County s response to question number 12. m. Who is responsible for servicing and collecting (including delinquent accounts)? Response: Servicing and collecting is the responsibility of the PACE vendor through a third party administrator that it hires. The assessments are paid to the County Treasurer and distributed out to the PACE vendor. 14. Does PACE financing trigger government contractor and prevailing wage requirements? Response: No. 15. Will clients be required to hire licensed contractors to perform the work? Response: Licensed contractors are required under the PACE program and will go through the standard construction and permitting processes. 16. If the work were done in a less than workmanlike manner, would the county assume any liability? Response: There is no liability for the County or any Cities that choose to participate in the program for work that is performed. Thank you for the opportunity to answer your questions and I look forward to seeing you at the December 11, 2012 meeting on this program. Sincerely, Dan Hamburg 5 th District Supervisor Cc: Board of Supervisors Meredith Ford, Auditor-Controller Susan M. Ranochak, Assessor/Clerk Recorder Shari L. Shapmire, Treasurer/Tax Collector Carmel Angelo, CEO Kristin McMenomey, GSA Director