STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 2016

Similar documents
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2016

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 2010

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Preliminary Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2007

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2013

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Preliminary Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 2009

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2009

1 Dynamic programming

MACROECONOMICS. Prelim Exam

Problem set Fall 2012.

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

SDP Macroeconomics Final exam, 2014 Professor Ricardo Reis

Ramsey s Growth Model (Solution Ex. 2.1 (f) and (g))

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Slides III - Complete Markets

Question 1 Consider an economy populated by a continuum of measure one of consumers whose preferences are defined by the utility function:

1 A tax on capital income in a neoclassical growth model

Macroeconomics Qualifying Examination

On Quality Bias and Inflation Targets: Supplementary Material

Comprehensive Exam. August 19, 2013

14.05 Lecture Notes. Endogenous Growth

Part A: Questions on ECN 200D (Rendahl)

Monetary/Fiscal Interactions: Cash in Advance

Eco504 Fall 2010 C. Sims CAPITAL TAXES

Part A: Answer Question A1 (required) and Question A2 or A3 (choice).

Optimal Credit Market Policy. CEF 2018, Milan

Macroeconomics of the Labour Market Problem Set

Home Production and Social Security Reform

Labor Economics Field Exam Spring 2011

The Ramsey Model. Lectures 11 to 14. Topics in Macroeconomics. November 10, 11, 24 & 25, 2008

Final Exam II (Solutions) ECON 4310, Fall 2014

TAKE-HOME EXAM POINTS)

Lecture 2: The Neoclassical Growth Model

Final Exam II ECON 4310, Fall 2014

Notes on Macroeconomic Theory. Steve Williamson Dept. of Economics Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO 63130

1 No capital mobility

(Incomplete) summary of the course so far

1 Fiscal stimulus (Certification exam, 2009) Question (a) Question (b)... 6

Real Business Cycles (Solution)

INTERTEMPORAL ASSET ALLOCATION: THEORY

Final Exam (Solutions) ECON 4310, Fall 2014

In the Name of God. Macroeconomics. Sharif University of Technology Problem Bank

Appendix: Common Currencies vs. Monetary Independence

The Measurement Procedure of AB2017 in a Simplified Version of McGrattan 2017

TOBB-ETU, Economics Department Macroeconomics II (ECON 532) Practice Problems III

Macroeconomics 2. Lecture 12 - Idiosyncratic Risk and Incomplete Markets Equilibrium April. Sciences Po

The Transmission of Monetary Policy through Redistributions and Durable Purchases

Graduate Macro Theory II: Fiscal Policy in the RBC Model

Macro (8701) & Micro (8703) option

Part A: Questions on ECN 200D (Rendahl)

Eco504 Spring 2010 C. Sims FINAL EXAM. β t 1 2 φτ2 t subject to (1)

Problem Set 3. Consider a closed economy inhabited by an in ntely lived representative agent who maximizes lifetime utility given by. t ln c t.

The Transmission of Monetary Policy Operations through Redistributions and Durable Purchases

Taxing Firms Facing Financial Frictions

A Model with Costly Enforcement

Exam Fall 2004 Prof.: Ricardo J. Caballero

Macro II. John Hassler. Spring John Hassler () New Keynesian Model:1 04/17 1 / 10

Part A: Answer question A1 (required), plus either question A2 or A3.

Problem Set #2. Intermediate Macroeconomics 101 Due 20/8/12

Linear Capital Taxation and Tax Smoothing

Equilibrium with Production and Endogenous Labor Supply

Eco504 Spring 2010 C. Sims MID-TERM EXAM. (1) (45 minutes) Consider a model in which a representative agent has the objective. B t 1.

Public versus Private Investment in Human Capital: Endogenous Growth and Income Inequality

Political Lobbying in a Recurring Environment

Fluctuations. Shocks, Uncertainty, and the Consumption/Saving Choice

Chapter 6. Endogenous Growth I: AK, H, and G

Lastrapes Fall y t = ỹ + a 1 (p t p t ) y t = d 0 + d 1 (m t p t ).

The Neoclassical Growth Model

Transactions and Money Demand Walsh Chapter 3

Homework 3: Asset Pricing

Interest rate policies, banking and the macro-economy

Part A: Answer Question A1 (required) and Question A2 or A3 (choice).

A simple wealth model

Notes on Intertemporal Optimization

Labor Economics Field Exam Spring 2014

Problem Set 3. Thomas Philippon. April 19, Human Wealth, Financial Wealth and Consumption

Monetary Policy in a New Keyneisan Model Walsh Chapter 8 (cont)

Monetary Economics Final Exam

Problem Set (1 p) (1) 1 (100)

Part A: Answer Question A1 (required) and Question A2 or A3 (choice).

Feb. 20th, Recursive, Stochastic Growth Model

The Stolper-Samuelson Theorem when the Labor Market Structure Matters

Overlapping Generations Model: Dynamic Efficiency and Social Security

1 Answers to the Sept 08 macro prelim - Long Questions

Cash-in-Advance Model

State-Dependent Fiscal Multipliers: Calvo vs. Rotemberg *

Trade and Labor Market: Felbermayr, Prat, Schmerer (2011)

Retirement Financing: An Optimal Reform Approach. QSPS Summer Workshop 2016 May 19-21

SDP Macroeconomics Midterm exam, 2017 Professor Ricardo Reis

Open Economy Macroeconomics: Theory, methods and applications

Bernanke and Gertler [1989]

Unemployment Insurance

ECON 815. A Basic New Keynesian Model II

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

General Examination in Macroeconomic Theory SPRING 2016

Sang-Wook (Stanley) Cho

Discussion of Chiu, Meh and Wright

General Examination in Macroeconomic Theory SPRING 2014

Lecture Notes. Macroeconomics - ECON 510a, Fall 2010, Yale University. Fiscal Policy. Ramsey Taxation. Guillermo Ordoñez Yale University

Distortionary Fiscal Policy and Monetary Policy Goals

Name: Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory II, Fall 2008 Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko Problem Set 2 (53 points). Due Friday, November 14

Transcription:

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 2016 Section 1. (Suggested Time: 45 Minutes) For 3 of the following 6 statements, state whether the statement is true, false, or uncertain, and give a complete and convincing explanation of your answer. Note: Such explanations typically appeal to specific macroeconomic models. 1. Limiting the number of foreign workers in the United States increases the wage of US workers. 2. Making college free in the United States reduces income inequality. 3. In models of the macroeconomy, depending on essential assumptions, the fiscal multiplier can be positive, negative or zero. 4. Monetary policy neither stabilizes nor amplifies business cycles. 5. If there were complete insurance markets everyone would behave as if they are risk neutral. 6. Subsidizing vacancy creation is the best way to get everyone back to work. 1

Section 2. (Suggested Time: 2 Hours, 15 minutes) Answer any 3 of the following 4 questions. 7. Consider an economy in which agents can live for a maximum of two periods. Let s denote the survival rate from the first to the second period. Agents derive utility from consumption c according to utility function ln(c) if alive, and derive warm-glow utility from leaving bequests b according to a utility function λ ln(b + κ) if deceased, where λ measures the strength of the bequest motive, and κ measures to what extent bequest is a luxury good. For simplicity, we set the interest rate to zero and the discount factor to 1. In the first period, agents receive an endowment w 1, and choose consumption c 1, savings a 1, and life insurance amount q 1, which could be purchased at a unit price of 0 < p < 1. Bequests b 1 left at the end of the first period if deceased are the sum of life insurance face value q 1 and savings a 1. In the second period, if alive, agents receive endowment w 2, and choose consumption c 2 and savings a 2. Note that no insurance contracts are available at the second period, since the death is certain. Bequests b 2 left at the end of the second period are entirely composed of savings a 2. Formally, the agents life-cycle problem is written as follows: subject to max c 1,c 2,a 1,a 2,q 1,b 1,b 2 ln(c 1 ) + (1 s)λ ln(b 1 + κ) + s ln(c 2 ) + sλ ln(b 2 + κ) c 1 + pq 1 + a 1 = w 1 b 1 = q 1 + a 1 c 2 + a 2 = w 2 + a 1 b 2 = a 2 (a) Write the first order conditions. Note that we want to start with a general case, and do not restrict the solution to be internal, i.e., the conditions you write should contain inequalities. Intuitively explain the meaning of the left hand side and right hand side of each condition. (b) For the following analysis, we assume that the solution is internal, and solve the problem recursively. As a first step, write the problem for an agent who is alive at the second period, and solve c 2 and a 2 as a function of the state variables in the second period. Discuss the partial effect (fixing state variables) of sequentially increasing λ and κ on the allocation between consumption and saving in the second period. (c) Verify that b 1 can be expressed in the form of b 1 = Aw 1 + Bw 2 + C with A > 0, B > 0. Intuitively explain why the amount of bequests chosen in the first period is increasing in endowments for both periods. (d) Find q 1 and specify a condition under which agents decrease life insurance holdings (q 1 ) in response to an increase in first period endowment w 1. Provide an intuitive explanation. (e) How does a reduction in second period endowment (w 2 ) affect life insurance demand (q 1 ) (intuitively explain your findings)? 2

8. Diamond OLG model proportional taxes We will investigate the possibility that the government wants to find the most effi cient way to meet its spending obligations using proportional taxes. Time: discrete, infinite horizon, t = 1, 2,... Demography: A mass N t N 0 (1 + n) t of identical newborns enter in period t. Everyone lives for 2 periods except for the first generation of old people who live for one. A mass (normalized to 1) of competitive (price taking) firms. Preferences: for the generations born in and after period 1: U(c 1,t, c 2,t+1 ) = ln(c 1,t ) + β ln(c 2,t+1 ) where c i,t is consumption in period t and stage i of life. For the initial old generation Ũ(c 2,1 ) = ln(c 2,1 ). Productive technology: The production function available to firms is F (K, N) = zk α N 1 α, 0 < α < 1, where K is the capital stock and N is the number of workers employed. You may find it convenient to use the implied per young person production function, f(k) = zk α where k is the capital stock per worker. Endowments: Everyone has one unit of labor services when young. The initial old share an endowment, K 1 of capital so they have (1 + n)k 1 units each. Government: The government has to meet an exogenous expenditure schedule {g t }. It does so by levying proportional taxes at rates, {τ 1,t } and {τ 2,t } on labor and capital earnings respectively in each period. Institutions: There are competitive markets every period for labor and capital. (You can think of a single collectively owned firm which takes wages and interest rates as given.) (a) Write down and solve the problem faced by the individuals born in period t. (b) Write down and solve the representative firm s problem in period t. (c) Write down the market clearing condition for capital, and define a competitive equilibrium (given taxes). (d) Obtain an expression for the non-trivial steady-state level of the capital stock and, given that the tax rates are less than 1, show that the steady-state is stable. What impact do each of the tax rates have on the steady-state capital stock? (e) Now assume the government does not discount the future so that we can look at steady-states only (and drop time subscripts). The government treats all households alike and wants to maximize welfare by choosing the path of tax rates to meet a constant expenditure, g, for all time. Without solving it, write down the problem faced by the government in terms of the tax rates and the parameters of the model. 3

9. Consider the following version of a stochastic growth model. There are a fixed number of price-taking producers that solve max Π t = Y t W t L t, L t 0 Y t = L t 1 ζ, 0 < ζ < 1, (PRF) where: Π t is profit; L t is labor; W t is the real wage; and Y t is output. The preferences of the representative household over consumption, C t, and labor are given by ( 1 ( E 0 t=0 βt C α 1 ν t (1 L t ) 1 α) ) 1 ν, 0 < β < 1, ν > 1, 0 < α < 1. Households receive labor income and profits from firms, and pay consumption taxes to the government. Households can store their assets K t, and earn zero returns on the stored assets. As usual, assume that assets held at the beginning of period t + 1, K t+1, are chosen in period t. Note that assets are used only as a storage device, and not as a factor of production. Households face the usual initial, non-negativity and No-Ponzi-Game conditions. The government collects taxes from consumption and maintains a balanced budget: (1 + τ t )C t = G t. (BB) Taxes are driven by government spending, which follows an AR(1) process around the log of its steady state value: ĝ t ln (G t /G ss ) = φĝ t 1 + ε t, 0 φ < 1, (TS) where {ε t } is an exogenous i.i.d. process, and G ss > 0 is steady state government spending. Individual consumers and producers are suffi ciently small to take τ t as well as G t as given. (a) Define a competitive equilibrium (b) Write down the firm s problem and find the first order conditions that maximize profits. (c) With the specified preference, is consumption (C t ) a substitute or a complement to leisure (1 L t )? (d) Write down the household problem in a recursive form (Bellman s equation and constraints), and find the first order conditions that maximize household utility. For the following analysis, we assume that the problem always has an interior solution. (e) Let lower-case letters with carats denote deviations of logged variables around their steady state values, and subscript ss denotes steady state values. Log linearize the wage equation (the FOC of the firm), Euler equation, the equations that characterizes the labor-leisure trade-off, and the government budget constraint. (Part f. on next page) 4

(f) Suppose the economy is hit by a temporary expansionary fiscal policy shock (ε t > 0). Prove that this change would cause agents to reduce labor supply. Provide an intuitive explanation for this response. 10. One-sided search with a two-tier benefit system Unemployment insurance systems around the world pay a high level of benefits for an initial period. Once the initial benefits have expired they pay a lower benefit, called subsistence allowance, indefinitely. That s what we are looking at here. Time: Discrete, infinite horizon. Demography: A single infinite lived worker. Preferences: The worker is risk neutral (i.e. u(x) = x) and discounts the future at the rate r. Endowments: The endowments of the worker depend on his state within the labor market. There are 3 possible states determined by employment and the size of benefits received. When unemployed with high benefits he receives flow income b u per period, with probability α he receives a job offer of wage w F on [0, w]. Or, with probability γ his high benefits expire and he shifts to being unemployed with low benefits. (Note: getting a job and getting a reduction in benefits are mutually exclusive events. Assume α + γ < 1.) When unemployed with low benefits he receives flow income b x < b u per period (b x is the subsistence allowance, the x stands for expiry ). He continues to receive job offers with probability α per period from the same distribution. A worker who gets hired immediately requalifies for high benefits. While employed a worker hired at wage w receives flow income w per period and with probability λ he loses his job to become unemployed (with high benefits). a. Write down the flow asset value (flow Bellman) equations for the worker. b. Show that for the state of unemployment with high benefits the usual (fundamental search) equation applies (i.e. rv u = w u where w u is the reservation wage for the high benefit unemployed and V u is the discounted present expected value of unemployment with high benefits.) c. Obtain the related expression for V x, the discounted present expected value of unemployment with low benefits, and show that the fundamental search equation does not apply in this case. Briefly explain your result. d. Draw a flow diagram showing the population movements between states when there is a continuum (mass 1) of similar workers. e. Write down a system of equations that can be solved for the steady state populations (you don t need to solve them). 5