DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS

Similar documents
FLEX LTD. GUIDELINES WITH REGARD TO CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS. (as Amended Through August 28, 2014)

THE MACERICH COMPANY. Director Independence Standards

BANK OF MONTREAL DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS

Listed companies must have a majority of independent directors.

TD Bank Group Director Independence Policy


BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST BOARD OF TRUSTEES CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES

Policy Regarding Nominations of Directors

SEC Approves NYSE Final Corporate Governance Listing Standards. December 2003

National Instrument Audit Committees. Table of Contents

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (Effective March 14, 2012)

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Time Warner Inc. Policy and Procedures Governing Related Person Transactions. Revised by the Board of Directors February 18, 2010

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES. As of October 25, 2017

GOODWILL OF GREATER WASHINGTON CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY JUNE 9, 2014 ARTICLE I PURPOSE

NYSE, NASDAQ and AMEX Publish Final Corporate Governance Rules

WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY

Related Party Transactions

OWENS & MINOR, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

SUGGESTED ADDITIONAL VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE TO PROVIDE GREATER INSIGHT INTO ADOPTED PRACTICES

HENNESSY CAPITAL ACQUISITION CORP. II AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

WINNEBAGO INDUSTRIES, INC. RELATED PERSON TRANSACTION POLICY AND PROCEDURES POLICY

I. PERSONS COVERED BY THIS POLICY

TPG PACE ENERGY HOLDINGS CORP.

CUTLER LAW GROUP Attorneys at Law 3355 W. Alabama Ste Houston, Texas Tel (713) Fax (800)

ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION POLICY STATEMENT REGARDING RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Consolidated up to 17 March 2008 This consolidation is provided for your convenience and should not be relied on as authoritative.

Legal Alert: Overview of NYSE and Nasdaq Corporate Governance Listing Rules December 10, 2003

NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTION POLICY

A Comparative Regulatory Guide to Listing in Hong Kong, London, New York and Toronto

MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY CONFLICT AND DUALITY OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE

Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc. Board Policy

SCHNEIDER CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Related Party Transaction Policy

New NYSE and NASD Rules Regarding Standards for Listed Companies

New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY OF THE NEW YORK STATE WEST YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION, INC. (ADOPTED ON THE 17th DAY OF February, 2016)

Corporate and Securities Law Update

TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS L.P. Corporate Governance Guidelines

HCL Technologies Limited

NASD and NYSE Rulemaking: Relating to Corporate Governance

POLICY ON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS. TAKE Solutions Limited

POLICY ON MATERIALITY OF AND DEALING WITH RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS GONTERMANN-PEIPERS (INDIA) LIMITED

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

FORTERRA, INC. CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT

MCLEAN YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICAL STANDARDS

( CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

14 October Related Party Transactions Policy

AGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE CHARTER

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

UHHS P&P. University Hospitals Health System Policy & Procedure Manual. Physician Employment

SEC Approves Nasdaq Final Corporate Governance Listing Standards. December 2003

GLOSSARY. 3) The two persons are each a director, trustee, officer, or greater than 10% owner in the same business or investment entity.

[NAME OF CHARTER SCHOOL] CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY ARTICLE I PURPOSE

Corporate Policies and Procedures Manual. Corporate Governance: Code of Ethics

IC ARTICLE 14. MUTUAL INSURANCE HOLDING COMPANY LAW. IC Chapter 1. General Provisions and Definitions

REVISED CHAPTER 14A OF THE MAIN BOARD RULES. Chapter 14A EQUITY SECURITIES CONNECTED TRANSACTIONS INTRODUCTION

Related Person Transactions

Chapter 14A EQUITY SECURITIES CONNECTED TRANSACTIONS. Introduction

EDEN TOWNSHIP HEALTHCARE DISTRICT ETHD 102 BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS POLICY. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

This document establishes a formal Code of Ethics for the employees of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (the Authority).

SITI CABLE NETWORK LIMITED

Community Foundation of St. Clair County Conflict of Interest Policy

Cnova N.V. Related Party Transaction Policy

Explanation. significant influence means control of at least twenty percent of total share capital, or of business decisions under an agreement.

Conflict of Interest. A. Overview

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS POLICY

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

SOLUTIONS TO MODULE 4 PROBLEM MATERIALS

POLICY REGARDING TRANSACTIONS WITH INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES. (Effective as of February 21, 2014)

Conflict of Interest Policy

Governance Policy Approved by the Board of Directors on December 6, 2016 CAN_DMS: \ \8

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY COMPASSPOINT

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS POLICY

The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Conflicts of Interest and Disclosure Policy

YMCA OF GREATER TRI-VALLEY CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

GE Power India Limited. Related Party Transactions Policy

BOARD OF TRUSTEES BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY MEETING DATE: June 12, 2014

POLICY ON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related Party Transaction Policy {Pursuant to Clause 49 (VII)(C) of Listing Agreement}

Related Party Transactions Policy

POLICY ON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

PROXY STATEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE (Non-Management Directors) SECTION I - BIOGRAPHICAL

HEG Limited POLICY ON RE LATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

POLICY ON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Chromatic India Limited Related Party Transactions

HOLDINGS LIMITED POLICY ON DEALING WITH RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED. Policy on materiality of Related Party Transactions and on dealing with Related Party Transactions

Policy, Procedure and Strategies. Conflict of Interest Policy

NBCC RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION POLICY

POLICY ON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS OSWAL GREENTECH LIMITED

POWER FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED POLICY ON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. INSIDER TRADING POLICY

J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. Corporate Governance Guidelines (revised February 2017)

POLICY ON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

2. any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the MPC s voting securities;

POLICY ON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED. Conflicts of Interests Policy

ELECON ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION POLICY

Transcription:

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS Reviewed and Reapproved 4-23-18

UNS Energy Corporation Director Independence Standards 4-23-18 I. Policy This Board of Directors (Board) recognizes that the expertise and perspective of independent directors is of great value and benefit to the Company and its shareholders. Accordingly, and in keeping with the other high standards of corporate governance which this Board has established for itself, the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, and laws and regulations applicable to the Company, this Board establishes the following guidelines on director independence and for determining whether its members are independent. II. Director Independence General The Board affirms that in order to be considered independent its members should satisfy these standards for independence consistent with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. No director may be deemed independent unless the Board affirmatively determines, after due deliberation, that the director has no material relationship with the Company either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. In each case, the Board shall broadly consider all the relevant facts and circumstances from the standpoint of the director as well as from that of persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation and shall apply these standards. Trivial or de minimis affiliations or connections to the Company by a director or his or her immediate family will not generally be cause for the Board to determine that the director is not independent. A director is not independent if: (1) The director is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of the Company, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer, of the Company. Employment on an interim basis as Board Chair, Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer shall not disqualify a director from being considered independent following that employment. (2) The director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct

compensation from the Company, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service). Compensation received by a director for former service on an interim basis as Board Chair, Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer shall not be considered in determining independence under this test. Compensation received by an immediate family member for service as an employee of the Company (other than an executive officer) need not be considered. (3) (A) The director or an immediate family member is a current partner of a firm that is the Company s internal or external auditor; (B) the director is a current employee of such a firm; (C) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and who personally works on the Company s audit; or (D) the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on the Company s audit within that time. (4) The director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of the Company s present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company s compensation committee. (5) The director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company s consolidated gross revenues. Relationships involving a director s affiliation with another company that account for lesser amounts than those specified will not be considered to be material relationships that would impair the director s independence, provided that the related payments for goods or services or in connection with other contractual arrangements are made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated parties. In the case of Company charitable contributions to tax-exempt organizations that exceed the threshold in the first sentence of this clause 3

(5), a director will be considered independent unless the director is a paid executive officer (exclusive of expense reimbursement) of any such organization. For the purpose of these Director Independence Standards, an immediate family member includes a person's spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares such person's home. III. Director Independence Audit and Risk Committee Members No director who is a member of the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board may accept any consulting, advisory or compensatory fee from the Company, or from any of its subsidiary companies, other than in that director s capacity as a member of the Board or any of the Board s committees. In addition, no director who is a member of the Audit and Risk Committee may be an affiliated person of the Company or any of its subsidiary companies apart from affiliation occasioned by the director s service as a member of the Board or any of the Board s committees. A director would be deemed an affiliated person of the Company if that director directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with the Company. IV. Director Independence Human Resources and Governance (HR&G) Committee Members In affirmatively determining the independence of any director who will serve on the HR&G Committee, the Board must consider all factors specifically relevant to determining whether the director has a relationship to the Company that is material to the director s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a HR&G Committee member, including, but not limited to: (1) The source of compensation of such director, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee paid by the Company to such director; and (2) Whether such director is affiliated with the Company, a subsidiary of the Company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the Company. When considering the sources of a director s compensation in determining the director s independence for purposes of HR&G Committee service, the Board shall consider whether the director 4

receives compensation from any person or entity that would impair the director s ability to make independent judgments about the Company s executive compensation. Similarly, when considering any affiliate relationship a director has with the Company, a subsidiary of the Company, or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the Company, in determining the director s independence for purposes of HR&G Committee service, the Board shall consider whether the affiliate relationship places the director under the direct or indirect control of the Company or its senior management, or creates a direct relationship between the director and members of senior management, in each case of a nature that would impair the director s ability to make independent judgments about the Company s executive compensation. 5