Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets 10: Limited Portfolios with Risk-Free Assets

Similar documents
Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Portfolio Models 9. Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment

Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Optimization II: Model-Based Portfolio Management

Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets 3: Markowitz Portfolios

Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Portfolio Models 3. Markowitz Portfolios

Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Reward II: Markowitz Portfolios

Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Reward III: Basic Markowitz Portfolio Theory

Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Reward III: Basic Markowitz Portfolio Theory

Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets 1: Risk and Reward

Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Portfolio Models 1. Risk and Reward

Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Return I: Introduction

Mean-Variance Portfolio Choice in Excel

Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets

Chapter 7: Portfolio Theory

Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets 12 Growth Rate Mean and Variance Estimators

Techniques for Calculating the Efficient Frontier

The mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations

Quantitative Risk Management

Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Reward I: Introduction

Mean-Variance Analysis

Financial Economics: Risk Aversion and Investment Decisions, Modern Portfolio Theory

Lecture 2: Fundamentals of meanvariance

Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Portfolio Models 1. Risk and Reward

Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Stochastic Models I: One Risky Asset

CSCI 1951-G Optimization Methods in Finance Part 07: Portfolio Optimization

Mathematics in Finance

Lecture Notes 9. Jussi Klemelä. December 2, 2014

Lecture IV Portfolio management: Efficient portfolios. Introduction to Finance Mathematics Fall Financial mathematics

Chapter 8. Markowitz Portfolio Theory. 8.1 Expected Returns and Covariance

Efficient Portfolio and Introduction to Capital Market Line Benninga Chapter 9

In terms of covariance the Markowitz portfolio optimisation problem is:

Solutions to Problem Set 1

Lecture 10: Performance measures

Economics 424/Applied Mathematics 540. Final Exam Solutions

Final Exam Suggested Solutions

The Markowitz framework

u (x) < 0. and if you believe in diminishing return of the wealth, then you would require

Hedging and Pricing in the Binomial Model

Optimizing Portfolios

Modeling Portfolios Containing Risky Assets

Understand general-equilibrium relationships, such as the relationship between barriers to trade, and the domestic distribution of income.

PORTFOLIO THEORY. Master in Finance INVESTMENTS. Szabolcs Sebestyén

King s College London

Chapter 2 Portfolio Management and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

Chapter 8: CAPM. 1. Single Index Model. 2. Adding a Riskless Asset. 3. The Capital Market Line 4. CAPM. 5. The One-Fund Theorem

Consumer Choice and Demand

Mean Variance Analysis and CAPM

This appendix discusses two extensions of the cost concepts developed in Chapter 10.

Section Linear Functions and Math Models

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture II: Production Function and Profit Maximization

You are responsible for upholding the University of Maryland Honor Code while taking this exam.

Consumer Budgets, Indifference Curves, and Utility Maximization 1 Instructional Primer 2

Math 103: The Mean Value Theorem and How Derivatives Shape a Graph

Topic 3: The Standard Theory of Trade. Increasing opportunity costs. Community indifference curves.

Fundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics

ECON Micro Foundations

The University of Sydney School of Mathematics and Statistics. Computer Project

Some useful optimization problems in portfolio theory

Financial Giffen Goods: Examples and Counterexamples

Foundational Preliminaries: Answers to Within-Chapter-Exercises

MATH362 Fundamentals of Mathematical Finance. Topic 1 Mean variance portfolio theory. 1.1 Mean and variance of portfolio return

Mean-Variance Analysis

Statistical Tables Compiled by Alan J. Terry

CHAPTER 6: PORTFOLIO SELECTION

Extend the ideas of Kan and Zhou paper on Optimal Portfolio Construction under parameter uncertainty

Eliminating Substitution Bias. One eliminate substitution bias by continuously updating the market basket of goods purchased.

Mathematical Analysis II- Group Project

ECO101 PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS Notes. Consumer Behaviour. U tility fro m c o n s u m in g B ig M a c s

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Questions and Answers Econ 8712

Financial Market Analysis (FMAx) Module 6

The Baumol-Tobin and the Tobin Mean-Variance Models of the Demand

1 Consumer Choice. 2 Consumer Preferences. 2.1 Properties of Consumer Preferences. These notes essentially correspond to chapter 4 of the text.

Two Hours. Mathematical formula books and statistical tables are to be provided THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER. 22 January :00 16:00

Portfolio theory and risk management Homework set 2

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

Capital Asset Pricing Model

Math1090 Midterm 2 Review Sections , Solve the system of linear equations using Gauss-Jordan elimination.

SDMR Finance (2) Olivier Brandouy. University of Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, IAE (Sorbonne Graduate Business School)

GMM Estimation. 1 Introduction. 2 Consumption-CAPM

MATH4512 Fundamentals of Mathematical Finance. Topic Two Mean variance portfolio theory. 2.1 Mean and variance of portfolio return

Portfolio Optimization with Alternative Risk Measures

Smart Beta: Managing Diversification of Minimum Variance Portfolios

FIN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008

IEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management

Making Hard Decision. ENCE 627 Decision Analysis for Engineering. Identify the decision situation and understand objectives. Identify alternatives

The Optimization Process: An example of portfolio optimization

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017

BROWNIAN MOTION Antonella Basso, Martina Nardon

(b) per capita consumption grows at the rate of 2%.

MARKOWITS EFFICIENT PORTFOLIO (HUANG LITZENBERGER APPROACH)

CHAPTERS 5 & 6: CONTINUOUS RANDOM VARIABLES

Professor Christina Romer SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO PROBLEM SET 5

Using derivatives to find the shape of a graph

1 Maximizing profits when marginal costs are increasing

LECTURE NOTES 3 ARIEL M. VIALE

4.2 Rolle's Theorem and Mean Value Theorem

Conditional Value-at-Risk, Spectral Risk Measures and (Non-)Diversification in Portfolio Selection Problems A Comparison with Mean-Variance Analysis

Mean Variance Portfolio Theory

3. Capital asset pricing model and factor models

market opportunity line fair odds line Example 6.6, p. 120.

Math 103 Sample Final

Transcription:

Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets 10: Limited Portfolios with Risk-Free Assets C. David Levermore University of Maryland, College Park, MD Math 420: Mathematical Modeling March 21, 2018 version c 2018 Charles David Levermore

Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Part I: Portfolio Models 1. Risk and Reward 2. Covariance Matrices 3. Markowitz Portfolios 4. Solvent Portfolios 5. Limited Portfolios 6. Markowitz Frontiers for Unlimited Portfolios 7. Markowitz Frontiers for Long Portfolios 8. Markowitz Frontiers for Limited Portfolios 9. Unlimited Portfolios with Risk-Free Assets 10. Limited Portfolios with Risk-Free Assets

Limited Portfolios with Risk-Free Assets 1 Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment 2 General Portfolio with Two Risky Assets 3 Simple Portfolio with Three Risky Assets

Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment We now consider investors who will not hold a short position in any asset. Such an investor will not borrow to invest in a risky asset, so the safe investment is the only risky-free asset that we need to consider. We will use the capital allocation line construction to obtain the efficient long frontier for long portfolios that might include the safe investment. We assume that the long frontier for the risky assets has already been constructed, and is given by σ = σ lf (µ) for µ [µ mn, µ mx ], where µ mn = min{m i : i = 1,, N}, µ mx = max{m i : i = 1,, N}. We will assume that µ si < µ mx, because otherwise the safe investment is more efficient than any portfolio of risky assets.

Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment The capital allocation line between the safe investment and the portfolio on the long frontier with return µ is the line segment in the σµ-plane between the points (0, µ si ) and (σ lf (µ), µ), the slope of which is ν ca (µ) = µ µ si σ lf (µ). The efficient long frontier is obtained by first finding the capital allocation line with the greatest slope. In other words, we solve µ st = arg max { ν ca (µ) : µ [µ mn, µ mx ] }. (1.1) We set ν st = ν ca (µ st ) and σ st = σ lf (µ st ).

Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment Let us consider the maximization problem given in (1.1): where µ st = arg max { ν ca (µ) : µ [µ mn, µ mx ] }, ν ca (µ) = µ µ si σ lf (µ). Recall that the function µ σ lf (µ) is positive and continuous over [µ mn, µ mx ]. This implies that the function µ ν ca (µ) is continuous over [µ mn, µ mx ], which implies that it has a maximum over [µ mn, µ mx ]. Because µ si < µ mx we see that ν ca (µ mx ) = µ mx µ si σ lf (µ mx ) > 0, which implies that the maximum must be positive.

Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment Because the function µ σ lf (µ) is strictly convex over [µ mn, µ mx ], the maximizer µ st must be unique. If µ st < µ mx then the function µ σ lf (µ) is increasing over [µ st, µ mx ] that maps onto [σ st, σ mx ], where σ mx = σ lf (µ mx ). Let σ σ 1 lf (σ) denote the inverse function of µ σ lf (µ) over [σ st, σ mx ]. Then the efficient long frontier is then given by µ = µ ef (σ) where { µsi + ν st σ for σ [0, σ st ], µ ef (σ) = σlf 1 (σ) for σ [σ st, σ lf (µ mx )]. (1.2)

Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment We will suppose that σ lf (µ mx) > 0 and that σ lf (µ mn) 0, which is a common situation. Efficient Long Frontier. The tangent line to the curve σ = σ lf (µ) at the point (σ mx, µ mx ) will intersect the µ-axis at µ = η mx where η mx = µ mx σ lf (µ mx) σ lf (µ mx). We will consider the cases µ si η mx and µ si < η mx separately.

Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment For the case when µ si η mx we will make the additional assumption that µ si < µ mx. Then the efficient long frontier is simply given by µ ef (σ) = µ si + µ mx µ si σ mx σ for σ [0, σ mx ]. Our additional assumption states that there is at least one risky asset that has a return mean greater than the return for the safe investment. This is usually the case. If it is not, the formula for µ ef (σ) can be modified by appealing to the capital allocation line construction. Remark. Notice that µ ef (σ) given above is increasing over σ [0, σ mx ]. When µ si = µ mx the capital allocation line construction would produce an expression for µ ef (σ) that is constant, but might be defined over an interval larger than [0, σ mx ]. When µ si > µ mx the capital allocation line construction would produce an expression for µ ef (σ) that is decreasing over an interval larger than [0, σ mx ].

Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment For the case when µ si < η mx there is a frontier portfolio (σ st, µ st ) such that the capital allocation between it and (0, µ si ) lies above the efficient long frontier. This means that µ st > µ si and µ µ si µ st µ si σ st σ lf (µ) for every µ [µ mn, µ mx ]. Because σ lf (µ) is an increasing, continuous function over [µ st, µ mx ] with image [σ st, σ mx ], it has an increasing, continuous inverse function σlf 1 (σ) over [σ st, σ mx ] with image [µ st, µ mx ]. The efficient long frontier is then given by µ si + µ st µ si σ for σ [0, σ µ ef (σ) = σ st ], st σlf 1 (σ) for σ [σ st, σ mx ].

Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment Remark. If we had also added a credit line to the portolio then we would have had to find the credit tangency portfolio and added the appropriate capital allocation line to the efficient long frontier. Typically there are two kinds of credit lines an investor might consider. One available from your broker usually requires that some of your risky assets be held as collateral. A downside of using this kind of credit line is that when the market goes down then your broker can force you either to add assets to your collateral or to sell assets in a low market to pay off your loan.

Long Portfolios with a Safe Investment Another kind of credit line might use real estate as collateral. Of course, if the price of real estate falls then you again might be forced to sell assets in a low market to pay off your loan. For investors who hold short positions in risky assets, these risks are hedged because they will also make money when markets go down. Investors who hold only long positions in risky assets and use a credit line can find themselves highly exposed to large losses in a market downturn. It is not a wise position to take yet many do in a bubble.

General Portfolio with Two Risky Assets Recall the portfolio of two risky assets with mean vector m and covarience matrix V given by ( ) ( ) m1 v11 v m =, V = 12. m 2 v 12 v 22 Here we will assume that m 1 < m 2, so that µ mn = m 1 and µ mx = m 2. The minimum volatility portfolio is ( ) 1 v22 v f mv = 12. v 11 + v 22 2v 12 v 11 v 12 This will be a long portfolio if and only if v 12 v 11 and v 12 v 22.

General Portfolio with Two Risky Assets The long frontier is given by ( ) σ lf (µ) = σ 2 µ 2 µmv mv + for µ [m 1, m 2 ], ν as where the frontier parameters are v 11 v 22 v12 2 (m 2 m 1 ) 2 σ mv =, ν v 11 + v 22 2v as =, 12 v 11 + v 22 2v 12 µ mv = (v 22 v 12 )m 1 + (v 11 v 12 )m 2 v 11 + v 22 2v 12. Recall that v 11 + v 22 2v 12 > 0 because V is positive definite.

General Portfolio with Two Risky Assets It follows that There are three cases to consider. µ mv m 1 = (v 11 v 12 )(m 2 m 1 ) v 11 + v 22 2v 12, m 2 µ mv = (v 22 v 12 )(m 2 m 1 ) v 11 + v 22 2v 12. Case 1. If v 12 > v 11 then v 12 < v 22 and µ mv < m 1 < m 2. In this case the efficient long frontier is given by (σ lf (µ), µ) where µ [m 1, m 2 ]. In other words, the entire long frontier is efficient.

General Portfolio with Two Risky Assets Case 2. If v 12 v 11 and v 12 v 22 then f mv 0 and m 1 µ mv m 2. This will be the case when v 12 0, which is how two-asset portfolios are often built. In this case the efficient long frontier is given by (σ lf (µ), µ) where µ [µ mv, m 2 ]. In other words, only part of the long frontier is efficient. Case 3. If v 12 > v 22 then v 12 < v 11 and m 1 < m 2 < µ mv. In this case the efficient long frontier is the single point (σ 2, m 2 ).

General Portfolio with Two Risky Assets Now we show how Case 2 is modified by the inclusion of a safe investment. The µ-intercept of the tangent line through (σ mx, µ mx ) = (σ 2, m 2 ) is η mx = µ mx σ lf (µ mx) σ lf (µ mx) = m 2 ν 2 as σ 2 2 m 2 µ mv = v 22 m 1 v 12 m 2 v 22 v 12. We will present the two cases that arise in order of increasing complexity: η mx µ si and µ si < η mx. When η mx µ si the efficient long frontier is determined by µ ef (σ) = µ si + m 2 µ si σ 2 σ for σ [0, σ 2 ].

General Portfolio with Two Risky Assets When µ si < η mx the tangency portfolio parameters are given by ( ) ν st = ν µmv µ 2 ( ) mv 1 + si, σ ν as σ st = σ νas σ 2 mv 1 + mv, mv µ mv µ si and the efficient long frontier is determined by µ si + ν st σ for σ [0, σ st ], µ ef (σ) = µ mv + ν as σ 2 σmv 2 for σ [σ st, σ 2 ].

Simple Portfolio with Three Risky Assets Recall the portfolio of three risky assets with mean vector m and covarience matrix V given by m 1 m d m = m 2 = m, V = s 2 1 r r r 1 r. m + d r r 1 m 3 The efficient long frontier associated with just these three risky assets is given by (σ lf (µ), µ) where µ [m, m + d] and 1 + 2r s + 1 r ( ) µ m 2 for µ [m, m + 2 3 2 d 3 d], σ lf (µ) = s 1 + r + 1 r ( µ m 1 2 d ) 2 for µ [m + 2 2 2 3d, m + d]. We now show how this is modified by including a safe investment. 1 2 d

Simple Portfolio with Three Risky Assets In the construction of σ lf (µ) we found that µ 0 = m, µ 1 = m + 2 3 d, µ 2 = µ mx = m + d, σ 0 = s 1 + 2r 5 + 4r, σ 3 1 = s, 9 σ 2 = σ mx = s. The frontier parameters for σ f0 (µ) were 1 + 2r σ mv0 = s, µ 3 mv0 = m, ν as0 = d 2 s 1 r, while those for σ f1 (µ) were 1 + r σ mv1 = s, µ 2 mv1 = m + 1 2 d, ν as 1 = d 2 2s 1 r.

Simple Portfolio with Three Risky Assets Because σ lf (µ)σ lf(µ) = s 2 1 r 2 µ m d 2, for µ [m, m + 2 3 d], µ m 1 2 d 1 4 d, for µ [m + 2 2 3d, m + d], we can see that the µ-intercepts of the tangent lines through the points (σ 1, µ 1 ) and (σ 2, µ 2 ) = (σ mx, µ mx ) are respectively η 1 = µ 1 σ lf (µ 1 ) σ lf (µ 1 ) = m + 2 3 d 5 + 4r 3 3r d = m 1 + 2r 1 r d, η mx = µ mx σ lf (µ mx) σ lf (µ mx) = m + d 1 1 r d = m r 1 r d. We will present the three cases that arise in order of increasing complexity: η mx µ si, η 1 µ si < η mx, and µ si < η 1.

Simple Portfolio with Three Risky Assets When η mx µ si the efficient long frontier is determined by µ ef (σ) = µ si + µ mx µ si σ mx σ for σ [0, σ mx ]. When η 1 µ si < η mx the tangency portfolio parameters are given by ( ) ν st = ν µmv1 µ 2 ( ) as1 1 + si, σ ν as1 σ st = σ νas1 σ 2 mv1 1 + mv1, mv1 µ mv1 µ si and the efficient long frontier is determined by µ si + ν st σ for σ [0, σ st ], µ ef (σ) = µ mv1 + ν as1 σ 2 σmv 2 1 for σ [σ st, σ mx ].

Simple Portfolio with Three Risky Assets When µ si < η 1 the tangency portfolio parameters are given by ( ) ν st = ν µmv0 µ 2 ( ) as0 1 + si, σ ν as0 σ st = σ νas0 σ 2 mv0 1 + mv0, mv0 µ mv0 µ si and the efficient long frontier is determined by µ si + ν st σ for σ [0, σ st ], µ ef (σ) = µ mv0 + ν as0 σ 2 σmv 2 0 for σ [σ st, σ 1 ], µ mv1 + ν as1 σ 2 σmv 2 1 for σ [σ 1, σ mx ]. Remark. The above formulas for µ ef (σ) can be made more explicit by replacing σ mv0, µ mv0, ν as0, σ mv1, µ mv1, ν as1, σ mx, µ mx, and σ 1 with their explicit expressions in terms of m, d, s and r.