UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * CRIMINAL DKT. NO. 2:11-CR-089. v.

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : CRIMINAL NO GOVERNMENT'S GUILTY PLEA MEMORANDUM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA INDICTMENT FOR HOBBS ACT EXTORTION, FAILURE TO FILE TAX RETURNS, AND ILLEGAL STRUCTURING

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 12 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 27

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No.

NOS CR CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

CASE NO CR CASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division. Count 1: Count 2: CRIMINAL INFORMATION.

Case 1:16-cv CBA-SMG Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS

Case 3:12-cr HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff and Respondent, ) v. ) Defendant and Appellant.

TACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY

Chapter 14 PROGRAM INTEGRITY

Case 1:15-cr KAM Document 529 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 15202

Chapter 14 PROGRAM INTEGRITY

Chapter 14 PROGRAM INTEGRITY

Case 2:13-cr ES Document 11 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 35 PageID: 62

No CR. JOSE RAUL REYNA, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF

Supreme Court of the State of New York Second Department Appellate Term 9th and 10th Judicial Districts Appellate Term

PARISH OF JEFFERSON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2017 FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION WELCOME OVERVIEW

ALI-ABA Topical Courses Offshore Tax Evasion & Bank Secrecy Update September 13, 2010 Telephone Seminar/Audio Webcast. Indictment

Case 3:13-cr AWT Document 2 Filed 05/21/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Criminal NO. 3:13CR~S (llwrj -'"

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS

LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) Crim. No. 1:09mj 4 1 \

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Conflicts of Interest Concerns for Tax Professionals. Kyle Coleman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. v. Case No Honorable Patrick J. Duggan FIRST BANK OF DELAWARE,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

Court of Appeals of Ohio

2017 Salt Lake County Board of Equalization Administrative Rules

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS

- - X CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE IEEPA AND THE ITR AND TO CONDUCT AN UNLICENSED MONEY TRANSMITTING BUSINESS. Background

F I L E D September 1, 2011

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ARREST WARRANT. BEFORE ME,, Judge of the Circuit Court, in and

Court of Appeals of Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division

- 1 - IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1549 IN RE: KEISHA M. JONES-JOSEPH ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT

Anti-Kickback Statute: Are Per-Patient Referral Fee Arrangements Permissible?

Follow this and additional works at:

No CR. RICHARD HARRIS, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF

Case 2:18-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. WILLIAM JOSEPH BOYLE, Appellant

Exhibit 11-3 Returning Home Program (Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) - Re-Entry)

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0689 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LAWRENCE JOSEPH FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

Case 3:09-cr HEH Document 7 Filed 11/13/2009 Page 1 of 8

against Defendants TempWorks Management Services, Inc. ( TempWorks Management ),

Case 4:15-cr WTM-GER Document 1 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

WikiLeaks Document Release

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 16, 2004

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

2018 Northwest Compliance Conference October 4, 2018

240.17a b-5 01; 18 U.S C. 2. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Violations of. Defendant. DAVID G. FRIEHLING, a~5,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

STATE OF OHIO LAVELLE COLEMAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiffs Case No. 16-CV-1678 CLASS ACTION AMENDED COMPLAINT

No CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. LAKEITH FOWLER, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INFORMATION COUNT ONE. At all times material to this information:

Dear Ms. Lawrence and Members of the Board of Commissioners:

ST. BERNARD CULTURAL CENTER, INC.

Exhibit 11-6 Making A Home (Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) Youth Aging Out of Foster Care)

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS HOMEOWNER GRANT AGREEMENT RECONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, ELEVATION AND MITIGATION (RREM) PROGRAM

Case 3:11-cv WGY Document 168 Filed 01/10/13 Page 1 of 53 IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

JANICE COLEMAN, CSR 1095, RPR OFFICIAL FEDERAL COURT REPORTER (313)

JANUARY 25, 2012 NO CA-0820 BASELINE CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION OF LOUISIANA, L.L.C. COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

APPENDIX I FORMS (6/30/03) 197

^BR-ffiF OF APPELLEE &*--

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of. This matter came before us on a certification of default

Case 5:18-cr DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 7. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket)

Case 2:18-cr JS Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 INTRODUCTION

Copyright (c) 2002 American Bar Association The Tax Lawyer. Summer, Tax Law. 961

Case: 5:12-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/15/12 1 of 10. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO COMPLAINT

WikiLeaks Document Release

BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION ANSWER

NEW YORK CITY HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION

FREEPORT HOUSING AUTHORITY Request for Proposals for Landlord-Tenant Legal Services ( RFP ) December 22, 2016

NASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

CASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. JAMES ALLEN BALL, JR.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OTTAWA COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. OT Trial Court No. 12CR028I

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 2/10/2014 :

mg Doc 9312 Filed 11/12/15 Entered 11/12/15 13:37:15 Main Document Pg 1 of 14

Case 1:10-cr REB Document 5 Filed 06/08/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS

JACKSON PARISH HOSPITAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 1

In The. Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN (WATERLOO) DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 18-CR-2058.

DAVID MAKOL, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and charges as follows: COUNT ONE

In The FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS. Dallas, Texas )( )( )( )( BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW

Courtney Arbour, Director, Workforce Development Division

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * CRIMINAL DKT. NO. 2:11-CR-089 v. * SECTION: C(1) JEFFERSON THOMPSON * VIOLATIONS: 18 U.S.C. 641 * * * FACTUAL BASIS The Defendant, JEFFERSON THOMPSON has agreed to plead guilty as charged to the pending bill of information in the above-captioned case charging him with one count of theft of government funds in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641. Should this matter have gone to trial, the government would have proven, through the introduction of competent testimony and admissible, tangible exhibits, the following facts, beyond a reasonable doubt, to support the allegations in the bill of information now pending against JEFFERSON THOMPSON: Representatives from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ( HUD ), an agency and department of the United States government, and representatives from the Jefferson Parish Housing Authority ( JPHA ) would testify that, beginning no later than December 1, 2005, through on or about December 31, 2008, the defendant, JEFFERSON THOMPSON, was a certified landlord in JPHA s low income or Section 8 housing program. These representatives would testify that the JPHA, which is located in the Eastern District of Louisiana, is funded directly by federal funds supplied by HUD, and was subject to HUD rules and regulations. These representatives would further testify that the Section 8 program was Page 1 of 5

administered locally by JPHA. Evidence, in the form of competent testimony from witnesses and admissible documents, would be introduced to prove that, on or about December 1, 2005, the defendant, JEFFERSON THOMPSON, was assigned a tenant named Antoinette Kelly ( Kelly ), for a property he owned located at 7306 Mistletoe Street, Metairie, Louisiana, located in the Eastern District of Louisiana. The terms of Kelly s lease with THOMPSON required a monthly rent of approximately $650, with approximately $595 of that amount being subsidized JPHA (which was funded by HUD), running from on or about December 1, 2005, through on or about May 1, 2007. The lease contract, which was signed and executed by THOMPSON, prohibited the landlord from receiving, in the past, present, or future, any payments from any source other than JPHA, for the rental of the unit being leased to Kelly. Beginning in or around January 2007, to reflect the current value of the unit located on Mistletoe Street in Metairie, Louisiana, the JPHA increased the amount of monthly rent to approximately $850, all of which, at that time, was subsidized by JPHA (which was funded by HUD). The lease term on this amended lease incorporated the terms of the prior lease, including the prohibition on THOMPSON receiving, in the past, present, or future, any payments, from any source other than JPHA, for the rental unit being leased to Kelly. The new lease was effective from on or about January 1, 2007, through on or about January 31, 2008. Both THOMPSON and Kelly executed a new tenant agreement reflecting these changes. Evidence would be introduced to prove that, at some point in or near summer 2006, THOMPSON raised the rent on the unit on Mistletoe Street to a level above-and-beyond what was being covered by JPHA s subsidized rent payments for Kelly. After being informed that Page 2 of 5

Kelly could not afford the new rent, THOMPSON went to an assistance center run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency ( FEMA ) with Kelly and applied for additional funds to cover THOMPSON s increased rent. FEMA is an agency or department of the United States which, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, made funds available to qualifying individuals. These funds were appropriated to FEMA as a result of legislation passed by the Congress of the United States of America with the approval of the President of the United States. Kelly was familiar with FEMA assistance because, up until August 2006, as a result of being displaced from Hurricane Katrina, Kelly had received FEMA assistance. After THOMPSON s increase in rent, and after his application to FEMA for additional funds to cover this rent increase was approved, the FEMA payments were sent directly to THOMPSON. These payments came in the form of monthly checks, in the amount of approximately $650 per month, covering the months of on or about August 2006 through on or about January 2008. These checks were made payable to the defendant and were endorsed by him. The FEMA checks would be introduced into evidence to prove the disbursement of these funds. Pursuant to the JPHA Section 8 contract THOMPSON had agreed to, however, he was prohibited from receiving any payments, from any source other than the JPHA, to cover Kelly s rent. Accordingly, once THOMPSON began receiving FEMA assistance for Kelly s rent, he was knowingly and unlawfully stealing JPHA Section 8 funds, which are federal funds provided by HUD. Evidence would be introduced to prove that while receiving the FEMA funds to cover Kelly s increased rent, THOMPSON used the JPHA funds from HUD for his personal use. Thus, from on or about August 2006, through on or about January 2008, THOMPSON was Page 3 of 5

knowingly and unlawfully stealing federal funds, that is, the JPHA Section 8 funds, which are funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, as set forth below in the following monthly amounts, for a total of $13,770.00: of HUD/Section 8 Assistance Amount of HUD/Section 8 Assistance 8/1/2006 $595.00 9/1/2006 $595.00 10/1/2006 $595.00 11/1/2006 $595.00 12/1/2006 $595.00 1/1/2007 $595.00 2/1/2007 $850.00 3/1/2007 $850.00 4/1/2007 $850.00 5/1/2007 $850.00 6/1/2007 $850.00 7/1/2007 $850.00 8/1/2007 $850.00 9/1/2007 $850.00 10/1/2007 $850.00 11/1/2007 $850.00 12/1/2007 $850.00 1/1/2008 $850.00 TOTAL $13,770.00 Copies of the JPHA checks would further be introduced into evidence to prove the disbursement of these funds. Page 4 of 5

Evidence would further be admitted to prove that, on or about December 10, 2008, the defendant, JEFFERSON THOMPSON, was interviewed by agents from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector General. After being confronted with the evidence of his receipt of FEMA payments on Kelly s behalf and his unlawful stealing of HUD funds during this time period, THOMPSON admitted that he went with Kelly to apply for the FEMA funds; that, while receiving the FEMA funds as additional funds, he also received and utilized the HUD payments for his personal use; and that he knew it was illegal to receive more than one government subsidy for the same tenant at the same time. MATTHEW S. CHESTER Assistant United States Attorney Texas Bar No. 24045650 JEFFERSON THOMPSON Defendant MARION FLOYD, ESQ. LA Bar Roll No. 22902 Attorney for the Defendant Jefferson Thompson Page 5 of 5