EY costing of proposed model designs Final Citizen s Jury

Similar documents
Estimated cost per policy of the new NSW CTP Green Slip Scheme under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW)

Financial ratios: Lost in translation

NSW CTP Benefit Reform

The real plaintiff lawyer costs in personal injury claims

On the road to a better CTP scheme. CTP reform position paper

IFRS 12. Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities

Understanding ASPE. Section 1506, Accounting Changes

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act considerations for life actuaries. 20 March 2018

2017 Protection Gap Study Singapore

Proposed Transfer of the Insurance Business of Calliden Insurance Limited to Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE (Australian Branch)

CITIZENS JURY ON COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY (CTP) INSURANCE

The Reduced Disclosure Framework

Understanding ASPE. Section 3840, Related Party Transactions

Premium System Design Balancing Stakeholder Needs. Jon Vallance, Vivian Tse. SIRA, Ernst & Young

THE INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF AUSTRALIA A.B.N

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations for Tier 1 Public Sector and Not-for-Profit Public Benefit Entities

NSW CTP and Lifetime Care

F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS. Houston Endowment Inc. Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 With Report of Independent Auditors.

Claims transformation. EY claims capability

THE NSW COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY GREEN SLIP INSURANCE SCHEME: SUBMISSION TO THE CONSULTATION ON THE PROPOSED REFORMS

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations for Tier 1 For-profit Entities. 31 March 2018

Insights. Motor Injury. Motor Injury Insights brings you all the news from the world of motor accident compensation. April 2018.

IFRS adopted by the European Union. Based on International Financial Reporting Standards in issue at 22 December 2015

Competition, compliance & cost continue to challenge the c-suite of Australian insurers

Tax Season Insights with Ernst & Young. March 29, 2019

F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS. Houston Endowment Inc. Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 With Report of Independent Auditors.

Regulatory Impact Analysis: Cost Recovery Impact Statement - Overview of Required Information 1

F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS. Houston Endowment Inc. Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 With Report of Independent Auditors.

sporting injuries insurance for sporting organisations accidents can happen protect your players

I NTERIM C ONDENSED F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS ( UNAUDITED) Bahamas Waste Limited Three Months Ended March 31, Ernst & Young

Embedded Value Review Embedded Value as at 31 December 2012

Tax Change in the USA: Major impact for Australian policy makers and business leaders

Cyprus Tax Authority issues guidance on revised transfer pricing framework for intra-group financing activities

Hertfordshire County Council and Pension Fund

Session 15PD: GAAP Hot Topics. Moderator: Presenters: Anne Potas

ERNST & YOUNG 2017/18 ENGAGEMENT LETTER AND AUDIT PLAN

2018 Homebuilder Tax Director Roundtable. Wynn Las Vegas 7-8 May 2018

Directors Fees Review

New accounting standards and interpretations. 31 December 2014

Tax Alert Canada. Manitoba budget Business tax measures. Corporate tax rates

IFRS adopted by the European Union

To privatise accident compensation schemes or not? Stakeholder views

Canada: Ontario unveils details of retirement pension plan

Government and Public Sector

Consultation on modified UK patent box

Financial Report For the year ended 31 December 2012 ANNUAL REPORT 2012

Accounting treatment of social benefits with a view to financial reporting requirements under the future EPSAS

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations for Public Benefit Entities. 31 March 2014

Applying IFRS. ITG discusses IFRS 9 impairment issues at December 2015 ITG meeting. December 2015

Accounting update. A new approach to grantor accounting for public private partnerships

Turkey amends transfer pricing legislation

EY GEORGIA TAX & LAW BRIEF

Outline of tax reforms to stimulate investment

Indonesia implements new transfer pricing documentation requirements in line with BEPS Action 13

Gillian Lofts. Generic guidance critical for industry and consumers Update on TSIP initiative. Guidance Deconstructed for life, not just at retirement

Global Tax Alert. Canada Alberta increases corporate and personal income tax rates. Executive summary. Detailed discussion

UNDERSTANDING COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY (CTP) INSURANCE IN THE ACT

New accounting standards and interpretations. 30 June 2015

Challenger Life Company Limited Comparability of capital requirements across different regulatory regimes

UK Tax Tables 2018/2019

Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. Central Region Long Term Care Project Value for Money Assessment

Canada: Quebec relaxes QST ITR restrictions

Pre-Budget Brief Singapore

Employee benefits (pensions)

Kuwait investment authority clarifies means and conditions for tax exemption of investments

Record to report. Are you audit ready?

Embedded Value Review Embedded Value as at 31 December 2016

IFRS 9 for Insurers. Syysseminaari. Aktuaaritoiminnan kehittämissäätiö. 30 November 2017

Ninth Annual International Tax Reporting Conference. Boston 7 May 2014

General insurance pricing conduct: getting the price right

FINANCIAL REPORT THE ROYAL AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF QUEENSLAND LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2011

IFRS 9 for Financial Services Presentation and Disclosure. Ulana Oswald Senior Manager. December 9, 2015

Japan releases guidance on transfer pricing documentation requirements

Article from International News. May 2017 Issue 71

Finding the capital you need to help your private business grow

EY banking alert. Draft Finance Bill Taking stock of the Autumn Statement and draft Finance Bill Introduction

Revenue Recognition. The immediate tax focus. 26 February 2018

Large business tax compliance

Application to compensate relatives

IFRS adopted by the European Union

South African Revenue Service releases public notice on recordkeeping for transfer pricing transactions

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations for Public Benefit Entities. 31 March 2015

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations for Tier 1 Public Sector and Not-for- Profit Public Benefit Entities. 30 June 2015

Pre-Budget Brief Singapore

Applying IFRS for IFRS 14 Regulatory Deferral Accounts

Insights. Motor Injury. Motor Injury Insights brings you all the news from the world of motor accident compensation. October 2017.

Russian Government issues bill for implementation of Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information

Tourism tax. EY Tax Alert. I. Date of coming into operation II. Tourism Tax Regulations 2017

2017 Budget and Tax Conference

Financial Instruments

2017 Budget and Tax Conference

Pakistan implements formal transfer pricing documentation and Country-by- Country Reporting requirements

25th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference

New Accountancy Act. A new Accountancy Act (AA) is effective in Bulgaria from 1 January Learn about the changes important for your business.

Affordable Care Act health insurance information reporting are you ready?

authorised under the Malaysian Insurance Act to carry out all insurance business

Certification of claims and returns annual report

1. Published International Financial Reporting Standards

We cannot continue to spend beyond our means, and we can no longer keep raising taxes on hardworking New Brunswickers.

Singapore enacts transfer pricing documentation requirements and publishes updated transfer pricing guidelines

Transcription:

EY costing of proposed model designs Final Citizen s Jury 24 March 2018

Contents Nature of cost estimates Risks and uncertainty Page 2

Nature of cost estimates Passenger vehicles only excluding Lifetime Care & Support scheme Existing scheme based on a split up of 1 July 2017 premiums Proposed models Mature scheme Do not represent premiums that will be charged Insurers set premium with regulator guidelines Average for all insurers not what each insurer charge Does not allow for unearned premium surplus Does not allow for a potential honeymoon period Premiums depend on details of Act, regulations and guidelines which do not yet exist Page 3

Risks and uncertainty Significant uncertainty of actuarial estimates Depend on future claims experience which depends on the outcome of future events which cannot be forecast precisely Actual claims experience may emerge at levels higher or lower than estimates No actual claims experience of models Used ACT, Victorian, NSW and Queensland experience as a proxy; adjusted for differences in design; hence greater uncertainty than current scheme. Cannot predict whether the claims experience of model will reflect the claims experience of these proxy schemes Significant change for stakeholders and changes will impact each stakeholder differently - not possible to accurately estimate their behavioural changes No detailed legislation yet available (incl regulations and guidelines) Any differences in the assumed details of the content of the legislation on which the costings are based will result in changes to the estimates of the premiums Page 4

Estimated premium $ per policy 2017/18 (value for money) Chart 1: Estimated CTP premium for passenger vehicles by model design compared to current scheme Average passenger vehicle nil ITC premium excl LTCS Levy effective 1 July 2017 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $ GST Motorcycle subsidy Nominal defendant & CTP regulator levy Insurer expenses & profit Interstate Legal & investigation costs Treatment & care Loss of earnings $- Current Model A Model B Model C Model D General damages, quality of life and death Page 5

Early access claim payments Chart 2: Estimated claim payments by insurers by quarter for treatment, care and loss of earnings for not at-fault claims 7.0 6.0 5.0 $ Millions 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3 6 9 12 Months Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Page 6

Scheme efficiency Chart 10: Estimated scheme efficiency by model design compared to current scheme % 90% 80% 70% 60% 56% 55% 57% 57% 58% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Page 7

Cost of claims split between defined benefits & common law Chart 11: Estimated split of benefits between defined benefits and common law (at-fault and not at-fault claims) % 90% 80% 42% 33% Proportion of Claims Cost 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% % 73% 67% 58% 67% 20% 10% 27% 33% 0% Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Defined Benefits Common Law Note: Claim costs above exclude all legal costs (including estimated solicitor-client fees) as they represent the benefits claimants receive Page 8

Estimated cost of claims split between at-fault (AF) & not at-fault (NAF) Chart 3: Estimated proportion of claims costs received by claimants for at-fault and not at-fault claims % 90% 80% Proportion of Claims Cost 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% % 89% 86% 71% 67% 20% 10% 0% 29% 33% 11% 14% Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D At fault Not at fault Note: Claim costs above exclude all legal costs (including estimated solicitor-client fees) as they represent the benefits claimants receive Page 9

Estimated proportion of claims costs for NAF claims split by WPI 10% Chart 4: Estimated proportion of claims costs for not at-fault claimants split by WPI above and below 10% (excluding legal costs) % Proportion of Claims Cost 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 48% 52% 39% 61% 36% 35% 64% 65% 24% 76% 10% 0% Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Claims at or greater than 10% WPI Claims less than 10% WPI Note: Claim costs above exclude all legal costs (including estimated solicitor-client fees) as they represent the benefits claimants receive Page 10

Estimated legal costs for NAF common law claims Chart 14: Estimated average legal costs per not at-fault legally represented common law claim (excluding interstate claims) 120 Average Legal Cost ('000) 80 60 40 20 0 Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Party Party Solicitor-Client Defendant Note: Average legal costs above are indicative only and represent the middle of a range of best estimates. Actual legal costs under the scheme could be lower or higher than shown. Page 11

Estimated potential population of defined benefit claims Chart 12: Estimated total potential population of defined benefit claims per annum (including interstate claims) 0 900 900 800 Number of Claims 700 600 500 400 600 300 200 0 At-fault Not at-fault Page 12

Estimated number of legally represented common law claims Chart 13: Estimated number of not at-fault legally represented common law claims per annum (excluding interstate claims) 600 580 500 495 465 Number of Claims 400 300 200 375 0 Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Page 13

Estimated number of claim meeting WPI thresholds Chart 15: Estimated annual number of claimants entitled to additional benefits once they meet the 5% and 10% WPI thresholds (excluding interstate claims) 600 500 Number of Claims 400 300 200 295 0 220 WPI >=5% WPI >=10% At-fault Not at-fault Page 14

Estimated number of NAF claims receiving treatment Chart 16: Estimated annual number of not at-fault claimants receiving treatment payments from one year after the accident date 200 180 175 Number of Claims 160 140 120 80 60 150 140 125 110 90 85 80 70 65 60 55 54 50 48 46 40 20-12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 Months Page 15

Reliance and limitations In undertaking these costings, reliance has been placed upon the data provided to us by the ACT government, the Victorian Transport Accident Commission, the MAIC, RMS, SIRA NSW and VicRoads. With regards to the ACT data we are specifically relying on the accuracy by which insurers have provided their data and classified appropriate payment types and injury severity coding and that this allocation has been accurate over time. We have also made judgements and estimates where the information provided here was not part of the analysis conducted as part of the review. In general, reliance was placed on but not limited to the information provided. Except where indicated, the information has been used without independent verification. However, it was reviewed where possible for reasonableness and consistency. We have performed the work assigned and have prepared this document in conformity with its intended utilisation by persons technically familiar with the areas addressed and for the stated purposes only. Judgements based on the data, methods and assumptions contained in the report document should be made only after studying the report in its entirety, as conclusions reached by a review of a section or sections on an isolated basis may be incorrect. EY staff are available to explain or amplify any matter presented herein. Although we have prepared estimates in conformity with what we believe to be the likely future experience, the experience could vary considerably from the estimates. Deviations from our estimates are normal and are to be expected. In accordance with normal professional practice, neither EY, nor any member or employee thereof undertakes responsibility in any way whatsoever to any person other than the ACT government in respect of this report. We disclaim all liability to any other party for all costs, loss, damage and liability that any third party may suffer or incur arising from or relating to or in any way connected with the contents of our advice, the provision of our advice to the other party or the reliance upon our advice by the other party. We are providing specific advice only for this engagement and for no other purpose and we disclaim any responsibility for the use of our advice for a different purpose or in a different context. Page 16

Other results Page 17

Estimated passenger vehicle premiums Chart 9: Estimated passenger vehicle premiums by model design compared to current scheme 600 Estimated Passenger Premium ($) 500 400 300 200 - Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Page 18

Estimated insurer loadings Chart 19: Estimated average cost per policy of insurer expense and profits 90 Average insurer costs per policy 80 70 60 50 40 30 42 39 37 35 5 5 4 4 24 24 24 24 30 3 24 20 10 22 24 24 25 22 0 Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Claims handling expenses Acquisition expenses Reinsurance expenses Profit margin Page 19

Estimated average claim size for NAF claims - WPI greater than or equal to 10% Chart 5: Estimated average claim size for not at-fault claimants with a WPI greater than or equal to 10% (excluding legal costs, general damages and quality of life benefits) Chart 6: Estimated average claim size for not at-fault claimants with a WPI greater than or equal to 10% (excluding legal costs) including general damages and quality of life benefits 450 400 450 400 Average Claim Size ('000s) 350 300 250 200 150 Average Claim Size ('000s) 350 300 250 200 150 50 50 0 Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D 0 Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Defined Benefit Common Law Defined Benefit Common Law Note: Average claim sizes above exclude all legal costs (including estimated solicitor-client fees) as they represent the benefits claimants receive. Amounts shown are indicative only and represent the middle of a range of best estimates. Page 20

Average claim size for NAF claimants - WPI less than 10% Chart 7: Estimated average claim size for not at-fault claimants with WPI less than 10% (excluding legal costs, general damages and quality of life benefits) Chart 8: Estimated average claim size for not at-fault claimants with WPI less than 10% (excluding legal costs only) 60 60 50 50 Average Claim Size ('000s) 40 30 20 Average Claim Size ('000s) 40 30 20 10 10 0 Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Defined Benefit Common Law 0 Current Scheme Model A Model B Model C Model D Defined Benefit Common Law Note: Average claim sizes above exclude all legal costs (including estimated solicitor-client fees) as they represent the benefits claimants receive. Amounts shown are indicative only and represent the middle of a range of best estimates. Page 21

Estimated number of NAF claims receiving care Chart 17: Estimated annual number of not at-fault claimants receiving care payments from one year after the accident date 200 180 160 Number of Claims 140 120 80 60 40 20 18 16 15 14 13 12 12 11 11 10 10 9 9 9 8 8 7-12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 Months Page 22

Estimated number of NAF claims receiving economic loss Chart 18: Estimated annual number of not at-fault claimants with loss of earnings from one year after the accident date 200 180 160 Number of Claims 140 120 80 60 40 70 60 50 45 40 35 33 31 28 27 27 26 26 25 25 24 24 20-12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 Months Page 23

EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organisation and may refer to one or more of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organisation, please visit ey.com. 2018 Ernst & Young, Australia. All Rights Reserved. ED none Ernst & Young is a registered trademark. Our report may be relied upon by ACT Government. We disclaim all responsibility to any other party for any loss or liability that the other party may suffer or incur arising from or relating to or in any way connected with the contents of our report, the provision of our report to the other party or the reliance upon our report by the other party. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ey.com