CRS State Profile: Texas

Similar documents
CRS State Profile: Wyoming

CRS State Profile: Alaska

CRS State Profile: Connecticut

CRS State Profile: Ohio

CRS State Profile: Massachusetts

CRS State Profile: Indiana

CRS State Profile: New Jersey

Land Economics 94:2, May 2018 Flood Risk, Local Hazard Mitigation, and the Community Rating System of NFIP, by Jingyuan Li and Craig E.

Floodplain Management Plan

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program


Section C Forms

Texas Economic Growth and Volatility

The widening gap between home price and household

Texas Bond Review Board

OWNER SURRENDER SERVICES

Partial Fiscal Year 2017 Urbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5307) Programs of Projects (POPs)

Contribution and Benefit Decision-Making for Texas Public Retirement Systems

Overview of the Homestead Exemption Increase (SJR 1 and SB 1, 84 th Legislature)

Homestead and Over 65 Exemptions How does it work?

... TEXPERS. The Texas Association of Public Employee Retirement Systems

Payday Lending. City Council Meeting September 1, 2015

5/25/2017. So why don t more communities participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? Agenda. What is CRS? Community Rating System

COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM (CRS) October 28, 2013

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) Together North Jersey Resilient Task Force Meeting

FY 2017 COUNCIL BUDGET WORK SESSION AUGUST 25, 2016

What are the savings? An Assessment of the National Flood Insurance Program s (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS)

STATE PENSION REVIEW BOARD OF TEXAS ACTUARIAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA. Tuesday, April 22, :00 AM

Preliminary Review of District s Bond Capacity. Thursday, March 25, For Discussion Purposes Only

Construction Spending, Labor & Materials Outlook

FY2018 Council Budget Work Session. August 17, 2017

Salvador Contreras University of Texas Rio Grande Valley January 27, Research Assistants: Jacob Almaguer Ruth Cano Ivan Vazquez

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

WHEN DISASTER STRIKES: RISK, MITIGATION STRATEGIES, AND RECOVERY

Flooding. Frequent occurrence. Can be severe and result in significant property damage. Major risk

In the first four months of each year, the U.S. Bureau of Labor

TIPS FOR PREPARING TO JOIN SYSTEM THE COMMUNITY RATING. Kristin Owen, AICP, CFM. VFMA Fall Workshops

GALVESTON COUNTY ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PROFILE

Organization Title Population Annual Salary

Texas Mid-Year Economic Outlook: The Skies are Beginning to Clear Keith Phillips Assistant Vice President and Senior Economist

... TEXPERS. The Texas Association of Public Employee Retirement Systems

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

Risk, Mitigation, & Planning

Federal Housing Legislation and Dallas Foreclosure Update. A Briefing To The Housing Committee September 2, 2008

Economic Development Incentives

Flood Mitigation Planning at the Texas Water Development Board. Josh Oyer, CFM December 7, 2016

National Flood Insurance Program s Community Rating System:

ROI for Joining CRS. Floodplain Management Association Conference. Sacramento, CA. September 2016

Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) Program

2016 Texas Economic Outlook: Riding the Energy Roller Coaster Keith Phillips Assistant Vice President and Senior Economist

State of Texas Habitat for Humanity Economic Impact Study

Texas Cities Debt Summary

BACKGROUND ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT DEVELOPMENT ADOPTION OF THE H-GAC HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN/UPDATES MISSION STATEMENT

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

The tariff sheets have an effective date of July 3, 2012.

Selected Economic Data for Texas Cooperative Extension, Central Texas District (8)

IN THIS ISSUE A MONTHLY NEWSLETTER OF THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION. Texas Nonagricultural Wage and Salary Employment (Seasonally Adjusted) 4.

Decomposing Regional Variation in Publicly Funded Newborn Care

PART 4 - Exchange Access Services 8th Revised Sheet 2 SECTION 2 - Exchange Lines and Usage Replacing 7th Revised Sheet 2 USOC

Community Resilience & NFIP s Community Rating system

Interim Study: Asset Pooling for Small Pension Systems. October 2018

Santa Rosa Independent School District

Over the next five years, Texas is expected to be among the best-performing. States, with growth across a spectrum

N Norex Engineering, Inc. O 1220 E. Main Street R League City, TX E Office X Fax

These tariff sheets have an effective date of July 2, 2013.

Texas Economic Outlook: Tapping on the Brakes

IN THIS ISSUE A MONTHLY NEWSLETTER OF THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION. Texas Nonagricultural Wage and Salary Employment (Seasonally Adjusted) 6.

Local Government Annual Report

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Community Rating System: A Comparative Analysis

*How Federal Policy. Causes Flood Disasters. Leslie A. Bond, CFM LA Bond Associates

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Texas Local Fire Fighters Retirement Act (TLFFRA) Pension Report

CITY OF VESTAVIA HILLS

2005 SECC Higher Education

6 MCF REPORT RESIDENTIAL GAS BILL ANALYSIS TEXAS DISTRIBUTION UTILITIES. Second Quarter Published by:

The National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System: An Introduction and Discussion of the RDO Role. October 2, :00-3:15 pm ET

Agenda. Introduction. Introduction -Map Study Lifecycle. Insurance Benefits of New Map

Tarrant County, TX Monthly Progress Report No. 33 (FEMA Contract No, HSFEHQ-09-D-0369) Task Order 01

Role of Disaster Insurance in Improving Resilience: An Expert Meeting The Resilient America Roundtable

North Texas Real Estate Information System MLS Current Month Summary for: July 2015

DFW Market Overview. Jay Denton Axiometrics ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM FLORIDA RESPONSE TO BW-12. Bryan W. Koon Director Division of Emergency Management

MUNICIPAL LAND USE STRATEGIES for Improving Flood Resilience

TEXAS FEBRUARY 2017 MONTHLY INDICATORS 6, % 22,586 27,079 LABOR MARKET REVIEW MARCH 2017

Flood Risk Outreach Tools for Georgia Communities. GAFM 10 th Annual Conference Presented By: Jarrett Mattli

Where all students connect, learn, grow and succeed BUDGET May 7, 2018

Gerard S. Mallet, Local Mitigation Strategy Coordinator FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

the United States and Texas

Last Review/Revision Date: 10/2018 Origination Date: 04/1/2017

FY Proposed Budget

Texas Local Fire Fighters Retirement Act (TLFFRA) Pension Report

Labor Day Weekend. August 31 September 2, 2018 Moody Gardens, Galveston, TX

North Texas Real Estate Information System MLS Current Month Summary for: March 2015

Galveston Island Labor Day Weekend September 1-3, The Lone Star State s largest, most comprehensive, craft beer educational and tasting event.

Community Incentives for Nature-Based Flood Solutions

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

CONSTRUCTION STAFFING. Mario R. Jorge, P.E. District Engineer San Antonio District

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Dallas/Fort Worth Multi-Housing

Dealing with Organizational Legacy Costs. Presented by City Manager Sheryl Sculley City of San Antonio, Texas

Transcription:

CRS State Profile: Texas This is a profile for communities in your state that are participating in the Community Rating System (CRS). This profile is intended to provide information to the State NFIP Coordinator and others as general information and for those who may wish to increase community participation in the CRS or to improve the CRS classifications of communities that are already participating. The CRS provides a discount in flood insurance premiums to property owners in participating communities. CRS credit points are given for a wide range of floodplain management activities, and the total of these points determines the amount of the discount. The data in this report include community CRS classifications as of May 1, 2013. NFIP Insurance policies in force are as of May 1, 2013. Insurance premiums and CRS discounts are estimates for May 1, 2013 based on policies in force on May 1, 2013. Table 1 shows the number of NFIP flood insurance policies in CRS communities in your state. Table 1 also shows the amount of premium paid for those policies and the savings those property owners will realize from their community's participation in the CRS. Policies for properties within the SFHA in communities in Class 9 and better communities receive a discount of 5% per class. Thus, the premium for a property in the SFHA in a CRS Class 7 community is reduced 15%. The premium for property outside the SFHA is reduced by 10 % for Class 1-6 communities, and 5 % for Class 7-9 communities. Preferred Risk Policies do not receive a CRS discount because they already receive a favorable rate. Table 1. Policies, Premiums and CRS Savings for CRS Communities in Texas POLICIES IN FORCE PREMIUM CRS SAVINGS 368,688 $191,847,911 $18,021,587 Table 2 shows the CRS credit each of your communities is receiving for each activity. For a detailed description of each CRS activity, refer to the 2007 CRS Coordinator s Manual. This manual is available for download at http://training.fema.gov/emiweb/crs/ or it may be ordered at no cost from: Flood Publications NFIP/CRS PO Box 501016 Indianapolis, IN 46250-1016 317-848-2898 Table 3 shows the current CRS discount being received by NFIP policyholders in your state by community. Altogether, about 5% of all NFIP communities participate, representing about two-thirds of all NFIP policies. If you have communities with a large number of NFIP policies that are not participating in the CRS, you might assist them in applying for the CRS. These discounts are real dollars that are staying in the pockets of your taxpayers. State CRS Summary: Texas Page 1 01/14

Additional benefits a community realizes from participation in the CRS include: 1. The CRS floodplain management activities provide enhanced public safety, a reduction in damage to property and public infrastructure, avoidance of economic disruption and losses, reduction of human suffering, and protection of the environment. 2. A community can evaluate the effectiveness of its flood program against a nationally recognized benchmark. 3. Technical assistance in designing/implementing some activities is available at no charge. 4. A CRS community s flood program benefits from having an added incentive to maintain its flood programs over the years. The fact that the community s CRS status could be affected by the elimination of a flood-related activity or a weakening of the regulatory requirements for new development, should be taken into account by the governing board when considering such actions. A similar system used in fire insurance rating has had a strong impact on the level of support local governments give to their fire protection programs. 5. Implementing some CRS activities, such as floodplain management planning, can help a community qualify for certain federal assistance programs. Please note that the community points for each activity may not add up to the total points shown, and these figures may not be those for which your communities are currently receiving CRS credit. This is because some activity credits are increased by a population growth factor. Also, these credits are those currently effective through May 1, 2013 and do not reflect more recent activity. In addition note that the percent savings will not exactly equal the class discounts of 5%, 10%, etc. since the total premium paid includes the federal policy fee which is not discounted. Also, as mentioned above, Preferred Risk Policies do not receive a CRS discount. Figure 1 shows average credit for each activity for your state s communities and the national average for each activity. You might use this as a way to target activities for which your communities need assistance. For example, the nation-wide average for Activity 330, Outreach Projects, is 99 points. If your state s average is significantly lower than 99 points, you might consider helping all of your communities with outreach. If your state s average is significantly higher than 99 points, you might want to put your efforts in some other activity. If one or more of your communities is significantly higher in an activity, it might be used as a model for other communities in your state your that activity. Figure 2 shows the percentage of communities participating in each CRS activity for your state and for the nation. If your state's communities are low in an activity, you might consider what needs to be done to improve this. For example, some states have statutory requirements for regulatory standards that are eligible for CRS credit. If it is verified that communities within those states are applying a state regulatory standard, all of the communities in that state will receive credit for that standard. If you have any questions on this report, please contact Cristina Martinez, CFM at 303-443-1695. State CRS Summary: Texas Page 2 01/14

COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM Activity Descriptions The following is a brief description of the eighteen (18) activities that receive credit under the Community Rating System. Only the activity numbers shown as (310, 320,...) appear in the charts and graphs on the following pages. 300 Series - Public information 310 - Elevation Certificates 320 - Map Information Service 330 - Outreach Projects 340 - Hazard Disclosure 350 - Flood Protection Information 360 - Flood Protection Assistance 400 Series - Mapping and Regulations 410- Additional Flood Data 420 - Open Space Preservation 430 - Higher Regulatory Standards 440 - Flood Data Maintenance 450 - Stormwater Management 500 Series - Flood Damage Reduction 510- Floodplain Management Planning 520 - Acquisition and Relocation 530 - Flood Protection 540 - Drainage System Maintenance 600 Series - Flood Preparedness 610 - Flood Warning 620 - Levee Safety 630 - Dam Safety State CRS Summary: Texas Page 3 01/14

Table 2. Community c310 c320 c330 c340 c350 c360 c410 c420 c430 c440 c450 c510 c520 c530 c540 c610 c620 c630 Arlington 81 140 0 10 71 59 55 184 307 117 60 175 170 0 330 0 0 46 1,958 Austin 127 0 40 10 75 59 0 235 298 125 315 132 100 0 330 65 0 46 2,297 Bastrop County 104 140 54 10 21 45 155 44 405 128 0 0 0 0 150 35 0 55 1,653 Baytown 56 140 182 15 33 0 40 61 295 129 110 106 908 0 180 0 0 46 2,423 Beaumont 56 140 142 10 26 0 0 153 223 92 70 98 0 0 30 0 0 55 1,123 Bellaire 70 140 115 5 18 0 221 36 175 107 0 152 0 0 230 0 0 55 1,426 Benbrook 127 140 184 15 66 59 16 254 435 115 131 0 0 0 330 0 0 46 2,117 Bevil Oaks 147 140 189 5 88 0 0 0 375 72 0 163 0 0 280 85 0 46 1,613 Bryan 56 140 211 15 64 59 85 87 347 114 288 96 0 0 330 0 0 46 2,057 Burleson 56 140 142 15 23 59 10 152 378 69 71 0 0 0 285 0 0 46 1,656 Carrollton 56 140 8 15 62 0 38 580 267 97 120 0 0 0 280 0 0 46 2,183 Cleburne 56 140 41 15 28 49 0 421 60 117 50 0 0 0 250 0 0 46 1,390 College Station 127 0 6 10 0 0 0 170 463 133 135 100 0 0 330 0 0 46 1,727 Conroe 56 140 90 10 51 0 200 36 288 105 134 137 0 0 330 0 0 46 1,997 Coppell 142 140 15 10 46 24 76 279 250 104 95 0 0 0 200 0 0 55 1,581 Corpus Christi 56 140 65 25 21 0 0 36 0 8 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 55 611 Dallas 122 140 149 15 97 63 123 400 387 149 153 114 175 0 290 110 0 46 2,752 Deer Park 74 140 30 15 52 0 10 218 165 105 75 106 0 0 280 0 0 46 1,424 Denton 122 140 143 15 7 59 29 534 265 133 105 0 0 0 315 0 0 46 2,371 Dickinson 56 140 168 15 34 66 0 0 430 105 125 170 0 0 30 0 0 46 1,485 Duncanville 112 140 106 15 41 55 118 290 225 86 55 0 0 0 330 0 0 46 1,719 El Paso 68 140 0 10 12 0 0 46 150 105 60 0 0 0 250 0 0 46 937 Fort Worth 56 0 68 15 39 0 0 171 272 120 105 130 10 0 0 0 0 46 1,186 Friendswood 81 140 202 10 90 0 60 222 282 124 155 0 1,104 26 300 205 0 46 3,164 Garland 74 140 182 15 18 59 56 312 342 101 105 124 10 0 280 0 0 46 1,928 Grand Prairie 112 140 141 15 90 62 109 131 553 131 175 148 10 0 330 130 0 46 2,575 Guadalupe County 71 140 29 10 66 0 0 36 210 87 147 114 0 0 0 0 0 55 1,119 Haltom City 76 140 194 15 20 52 0 203 233 97 105 113 100 0 330 0 0 46 1,871 Harris County 69 140 114 5 73 0 0 199 355 123 105 116 100 0 250 115 0 55 1,967 Houston 56 140 188 5 82 66 101 58 441 117 190 85 300 0 330 130 0 55 2,516 Hurst 112 140 119 15 38 0 10 145 319 99 80 0 60 0 250 0 0 46 1,582 Kemah 97 140 118 5 20 49 0 102 264 46 0 0 1,203 354 280 105 0 55 2,903 La Porte 56 140 130 25 23 49 20 232 198 97 220 102 0 0 200 165 0 55 1,858 League City 104 140 183 15 78 66 60 90 522 120 168 112 0 4 330 0 0 46 2,182 Lewisville 56 140 167 25 24 59 10 94 327 132 88 0 0 0 280 0 0 55 1,763 Live Oak 71 140 27 10 53 0 0 457 140 108 20 114 0 0 330 0 0 46 1,631 Lubbock 56 140 6 10 18 0 135 204 251 117 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 55 1,259 State CRS Summary: Texas Page 4 01/14 Total Points

Table 2. Community c310 c320 c330 c340 c350 c360 c410 c420 c430 c440 c450 c510 c520 c530 c540 c610 c620 c630 Total Points Midland 112 140 0 10 0 0 139 102 291 123 55 0 0 0 312 0 0 55 1,403 Missouri City 85 140 171 10 80 0 0 36 290 147 188 105 0 0 30 24 0 46 1,656 Nassau Bay 70 140 152 5 58 24 0 200 340 182 35 85 0 0 300 110 0 55 1,901 North Richland Hills 127 140 4 10 91 59 123 412 293 115 181 0 0 0 330 0 0 55 2,177 Odessa 147 140 36 66 25 0 25 65 333 133 105 0 100 0 312 0 0 55 1,556 Pasadena 56 140 39 5 20 0 0 241 257 154 60 85 300 0 250 0 0 46 1,788 Pearland 71 140 178 10 0 59 0 80 296 81 50 145 271 0 225 0 0 46 1,773 Pflugerville 142 140 85 15 55 59 0 297 260 82 75 0 0 0 15 0 0 46 1,521 Plano 56 140 0 15 5 59 87 515 242 115 399 140 0 0 195 0 0 46 2,666 Port Arthur 127 140 8 5 20 0 0 44 95 0 0 163 0 0 230 0 0 55 894 Richardson 56 140 32 15 40 59 55 413 249 128 35 0 0 0 280 0 0 46 1,891 San Marcos 70 140 97 10 50 59 0 83 307 113 290 0 0 0 280 0 0 55 1,879 Seabrook 56 140 79 10 25 59 109 46 245 189 0 106 0 0 200 140 0 46 1,563 Sugar Land 56 140 41 5 12 0 32 94 316 97 245 105 0 0 0 0 0 46 1,550 Sunset Valley 137 140 103 10 22 59 0 413 202 91 65 0 15 0 300 0 0 46 1,874 Sweetwater 112 140 0 5 21 0 10 94 15 60 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 55 647 Tiki Island 56 140 144 15 51 66 0 54 303 10 30 170 0 0 200 0 0 46 1,345 Wharton 56 140 0 15 19 0 0 36 312 79 50 134 15 0 300 20 0 46 1,236 Wichita Falls 56 140 103 15 58 0 0 80 326 125 94 106 100 0 30 130 0 46 1,409 Texas Average Credit 84 140 104 13 44 56 75 188 289 108 123 123 266 128 249 105 0 49 1,779 Texas % of Communities 100% 95% 89% 100% 95% 54% 55% 96% 98% 98% 84% 59% 34% 5% 95% 27% 0% 100% National Average Credit 68 140 99 14 45 47 89 182 291 97 111 129 237 79 201 93 312 63 1,528 National % of Communities 100% 93% 89% 75% 92% 47% 50% 91% 99% 90% 90% 49% 25% 13% 78% 40% 0.1% 91% State CRS Summary: Texas Page 5 01/14

Community Table 3. NFIP Policies NFIP Premium CRS Discount Arlington 1,687 $897,765 $92,676 Austin 5,740 $3,802,884 $702,849 Bastrop County 324 $209,099 $15,338 Baytown 4,745 $2,399,524 $157,683 Beaumont 8,370 $3,925,063 $75,723 Bellaire 4,814 $4,166,487 $333,461 Benbrook 371 $277,162 $52,512 Bevil Oaks 333 $174,816 $16,929 Bryan 557 $289,059 $39,162 Burleson 116 $62,113 $7,216 Carrollton 347 $263,964 $39,069 Cleburne 142 $89,228 $7,510 College Station 581 $292,263 $22,594 Conroe 583 $316,170 $17,835 Coppell 251 $110,487 $3,957 Corpus Christi 21,167 $10,167,478 $297,491 Dallas 3,849 $2,693,168 $570,440 Deer Park 4,940 $2,182,827 $44,393 Denton 530 $390,790 $73,142 Dickinson 2,205 $1,120,119 $44,594 Duncanville 192 $146,937 $20,667 El Paso 4,895 $3,310,568 $147,633 Fort Worth 2,388 $1,794,911 $143,397 Friendswood 7,561 $3,047,854 $119,629 Garland 494 $375,419 $51,903 Grand Prairie 300 $150,174 $16,065 Guadalupe County 1,947 $1,657,697 $136,523 Haltom City 329 $369,013 $58,325 Harris County 87,330 $39,204,418 $1,235,230 Houston 133,514 $72,427,816 $11,311,875 Hurst 245 $192,676 $26,933 Kemah 598 $523,266 $122,946 La Porte 5,381 $2,821,212 $124,016 League City 16,044 $6,175,436 $151,988 Lewisville 169 $110,640 $10,674 Live Oak 68 $28,012 $1,953 Lubbock 2,114 $1,703,672 $163,712 Midland 1,064 $910,980 $88,251 Missouri City 4,154 $1,604,446 $36,020 Nassau Bay 1,305 $838,152 $96,418 North Richland Hills 268 $141,881 $20,573 Odessa 1,036 $826,321 $132,535 Pasadena 10,960 $5,104,614 $219,413 Pearland 7,529 $3,407,514 $171,842 Pflugerville 96 $37,764 $1,653 Plano 795 $386,782 $63,821 Port Arthur 6,227 $3,052,546 $71,374 Richardson 306 $212,010 $23,349 State CRS Summary: Texas Page 6 01/14

Table 3. Community NFIP NFIP CRS Policies Premium Discount San Marcos 461 $256,770 $35,030 Seabrook 3,541 $2,682,047 $275,804 Sugar Land 3,438 $1,320,813 $11,337 Sunset Valley 33 $31,241 $2,779 Sweetwater 39 $36,283 $1,695 Tiki Island 567 $2,056,527 $226,023 Wharton 562 $334,572 $25,230 Wichita Falls 1,086 $736,461 $60,400 CRS Communities 368,688 $191,847,911 $18,021,587 Non-CRS Communities 289,707 $170,293,156 $0 All Communities 658,395 $362,141,067 $18,021,587 State CRS Summary: Texas Page 7 01/14

State CRS Summary: Texas Page 8 01/14

State CRS Summary: Texas Page 9 01/14