Central Erin Mills. Community Profile

Similar documents
Rathwood. Community Profile. expansion and parks development completed most of the community.

Erindale. Community Profile

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

Average persons in household. Top three industries Post-secondary education (25 64 years) 7.1% Unemployment rate

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

Ward 3 Barrhaven. City of Ottawa Ward Profiles 2011 Census and National Household Survey POPULATION* 46, ,390. Total City of Ottawa Population

City of Edmonton Population Change by Age,

City Windsor 1991 Canada Census WARD 3

City Windsor 1991 Canada Census WARD 1

Brockley Neighbourhood Profile

Glanworth Neighbourhood Profile

The Social Planning Council of Peel. A Comparative Perspective of Social Indicators in Peel Neighbourhoods, 2001

TABLE 1. PROFILE OF GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE CREDIT RIVER WATERSHED

University of Minnesota

ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Mid - City Industrial

Camden Industrial. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis.

Shingle Creek. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis. October 2011

ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

City of Windsor 1986 Canada Census. Walker Farm Planning District and Policy Area

A Collection of Statistical Data for Huron County and its Census Subdivisions

Usual Resident Population Count , , ,253. Usual Resident Population Change , % ,

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

APPENDIX 6: CENSUS DATA BURLINGTON, VERMONT

Socio-economic Profile for Northeastern Region Community Futures Development Corporation. Prepared for: FedNor/Industry Canada

Economic Base Analysis

Toronto s City #3: A Profile of Four Groups of Neighbourhoods

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

The Three Cities in Toronto 1970 to 2005

Town Profiles: Demographic, Economic, and Housing Statistics for De Smet City and Wall Town, SOuth Dakota

Statistics about Sleaford Navigation

Socio-economic Profile for Pan-Northern Region Community Futures Development Corporation. Prepared for: FedNor/Industry Canada

Statistics about the Canning Town South Ward, Newham

CONSTITUENCY PROFILE: DUBLIN SOUTH-WEST

A Profile of Workplaces in Waterloo Region

Statistical Profile of Persons with Activity Limitations in London

PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER

Economic Overview City of Tyler, TX. January 8, 2018

ECONOMIC OVERVIEW DuPage County, Illinois

Urban Action Agenda Community Profiles COVER TO GO HERE. City of Beacon

Economic Overview York County, South Carolina. February 14, 2018

Economic Overview. Lawrence, KS MSA

Profile of the Francophone Community in CHAMPLAIN 2010

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Woodlands County Economic Indicators 2015

A Profile of the Aboriginal Population in Surrey, BC

The Trails. 1,500 sf Space Available. In a 3 Mile Radius 69,985 Population 25,450 Households $78,216 Avg HH Inc. 1,500 sf Corner Space

CONSTITUENCY PROFILE: DÚN LAOGHAIRE

SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO)

Tetrad Computer Applications Inc.

Economic Overview Fairfax / Falls Church. October 23, 2017

Census Variables Available For YOUNG ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS: A DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE by Donald J. Hernandez

Economic Overview Monterey County, California. July 22, 2016

Profile of the Francophone Community in. Algoma, Cochrane, Manitoulin, Sudbury 2010

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT...7

Economic Overview Capital District

Economic Overview Mohawk Valley

Economic Overview Loudoun County, Virginia. October 23, 2017

Economic Overview Long Island

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Economic Overview New York

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

October 28, Economic Overview Yellowstone County, Montana

June 9, Economic Overview Billings, MT MSA

Economic Overview Western New York

Unemployment in Boston

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Economic Overview Long Island

Transcription:

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Planning and Building Department February, 2004 Community Profile History The Credit River valley was exclusively the domain of the (native band, part of the Ojibway tribe), from the late seventeenth century to the early nineteenth century. By 1820 the area known as the Central Erin Planning District was available for settlement, following the second purchase from the band, including the area they had previously reserved, which extended for one mile on either side of the Credit River. The pioneers followed quickly, and an 1877 map shows the area dotted with farm houses. Early in the 1830s William Comfort built a mill on the Credit River, which became a refuge for William Lyon Mackenzie during the 1837 Rebellion. The Barber Brothers established their woollen-mill on this site in 1853, and the village of Barbertown, now part of the, was born. McCarthy Milling still operates a grist mill in these buildings. Another local industry was brick making, which gives McFarren Blvd. its name. The first commercial brickyard was established in 1880 and operated for over a century. By 1983, when the present district plan was being prepared, was largely undeveloped. Today, Central Erin is a growing community, with family homes and green space, and a landmark Town Centre. Table 1-2001 Total Population as a % of Male 14,495 301,495 4.8% Fem ale 14,825 309,235 4.8% Total 29,325 610,730 4.8%, Leading Today for Tomorrow

Page 2 City of, Planning and Building Department February 2004 Figure 1. Population Pyramid 75+ 65-74 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 -6-4 -2 0 2 4 6 Percent Male Female Table 2 - Age Groups Age Group Male % Female % Total % Male % Female % Total % 0-4 1,020 3.5% 1,035 3.5% 2,055 7.0% 20,460 3.4% 19,690 3.2% 40,150 6.6% 5.1% 5-9 1,380 4.7% 1,200 4.1% 2,580 8.8% 23,680 3.9% 22,300 3.7% 45,980 7.5% 5.6% 10-14 1,245 4.2% 1,215 4.1% 2,460 8.4% 23,285 3.8% 21,610 3.5% 44,895 7.4% 5.5% 15-19 1,135 3.9% 1,225 4.2% 2,360 8.0% 22,630 3.7% 21,265 3.5% 43,895 7.2% 5.4% 20-24 1,010 3.4% 840 2.9% 1,850 6.3% 21,185 3.5% 20,050 3.3% 41,235 6.8% 4.5% 25-29 765 2.6% 760 2.6% 1,525 5.2% 19,740 3.2% 21,675 3.6% 41,415 6.8% 3.7% 30-34 985 3.4% 1,190 4.1% 2,175 7.4% 23,350 3.8% 25,095 4.1% 48,445 7.9% 4.5% 35-39 1,365 4.7% 1,685 5.7% 3,050 10.4% 28,080 4.6% 29,310 4.8% 57,390 9.4% 5.3% 40-44 1,455 5.0% 1,580 5.4% 3,035 10.4% 26,865 4.4% 28,460 4.7% 55,325 9.1% 5.5% 45-49 1,225 4.2% 1,325 4.5% 2,550 8.7% 23,270 3.8% 24,625 4.0% 47,895 7.8% 5.3% 50-54 1,120 3.8% 925 3.1% 2,045 6.9% 20,830 3.4% 20,990 3.4% 41,820 6.8% 4.9% 55-59 585 2.0% 640 2.2% 1,225 4.2% 14,675 2.4% 14,855 2.4% 29,530 4.8% 4.1% 60-64 510 1.7% 360 1.2% 870 3.0% 10,935 1.8% 11,430 1.9% 22,365 3.7% 3.9% 65-74 500 1.7% 545 1.9% 1,045 3.6% 15,130 2.5% 16,770 2.7% 31,900 5.2% 3.3% 75+ 215 0.7% 290 1.0% 505 1.7% 7,380 1.2% 11,100 1.8% 18,480 3.0% 2.7% Total 14,495 49.5% 14,825 50.5% 29,325 100.0% 301,495 49.4% 309,235 50.6% 610,730 100.0% 4.8%

February 2004 City of, Planning and Building Department Page 3 Rank Ethnic Origin Table 3 - Population by Ethnic Origin (Single Responses) Ethnic origin refers to the ethnic or cultural origins of a person's ancestors. An ancestor is someone from whom a person is descended and is usually more distant than a grandparent. It is not the same as place of birth, citizenship or nationality. People who responded to more than one category were counted as multiple responses. % % 1 East Indian 3,610 12.3% 56,785 9.3% 6.4% 2 Chinese 3,550 12.1% 32,455 5.3% 10.9% 3 Canadian 1,885 6.4% 43,835 7.2% 4.3% 4 Italian 1,360 4.6% 30,505 5.0% 4.5% 5 Portuguese 895 3.1% 24,105 3.9% 3.7% 6 English 685 2.3% 24,780 4.1% 2.8% 7 Polish 670 2.3% 28,915 4.7% 2.3% 8 Filipino 660 2.3% 21,415 3.5% 3.1% 9 Croatian 645 2.2% 6,745 1.1% 9.6% 10 Jamaican 595 2.0% 14,880 2.4% 4.0% 11 Irish 420 1.4% 8,520 1.4% 4.9% 12 Scottish 335 1.2% 9,550 1.6% 3.5% 13 Egyptian 320 1.1% 3,545 0.6% 9.0% 14 German 320 1.1% 6,025 1.0% 5.3% 15 Pakistani 290 1.0% 8,460 1.4% 3.4% 16 Arab, n.i.e. 1 230 0.8% 3,250 0.5% 7.1% 17 South Asian, n.i.e. 1 215 0.7% 5,185 0.8% 4.1% 18 Ukrainian 210 0.7% 7,170 1.2% 2.9% 19 Korean 205 0.7% 4,805 0.8% 4.3% 20 Lebanese 205 0.7% 3,070 0.5% 6.7% Other Single Responses 3,540 12.1% 92,855 15.2% 3.8% Multiple Responses 8,480 28.9% 173,870 28.5% 4.9% Total Responses 29,325 100.0% 610,730 100.0% 4.8% Rank Table 4 - Total Population by Home Language (Top 10 Single Responses) Home language is the language spoken most frequently. Some people may have indicated more than one language if multiple languages were spoken equally often. Language % % 1 English 22,465 76.6% 452,470 74.1% 5.0% 2 Cantonese 1,225 4.2% 10,580 1.7% 11.6% 3 Chinese, n.o.s. 2 1,045 3.6% 10,185 1.7% 10.3% 4 Urdu 670 2.3% 12,490 2.0% 5.4% 5 Punjabi 645 2.2% 21,365 3.5% 3.0% 6 Arabic 490 1.7% 9,470 1.6% 5.2% 7 Polish 470 1.6% 22,610 3.7% 2.1% 8 Mandarin 350 1.2% 2,620 0.4% 13.4% 9 Croatian 340 1.2% 3,855 0.6% 8.8% 10 Hindi 340 1.2% 3,560 0.6% 9.6% 1 n.i.e. - not included elsewhere 2 n.o.s. - not otherwise specified

Page 4 City of, Planning and Building Department February 2004 Rank Place of Birth Table 5 - Place of Birth for Immigrants % % 1 India 1,855 13.8% 33,420 11.7% 5.6% 2 Hong Kong 1,395 10.4% 9,565 3.3% 14.6% 3 China, People's Republic of 860 6.4% 8,900 3.1% 9.7% 4 United Kingdom 790 5.9% 18,115 6.3% 4.4% 5 Pakistan 770 5.7% 13,580 4.8% 5.7% 6 Poland 585 4.4% 24,565 8.6% 2.4% 7 Philippines 570 4.3% 18,625 6.5% 3.1% 8 Portugal 460 3.4% 13,625 4.8% 3.4% 9 Jamaica 385 2.9% 12,200 4.3% 3.2% 10 Taiwan 385 2.9% 2,160 0.8% 17.8% All other places of birth 5,365 39.9% 130,945 45.8% 4.1% Total 13,445 100.0% 285,640 100.0% 4.7% Rank Place of Birth % % 1 Pakistan 395 17.2% 8,605 14.3% 4.6% 2 India 370 16.1% 12,370 20.6% 3.0% 3 Hong Kong 305 13.2% 1,445 2.4% 21.1% 4 China, People's Republic of 180 7.8% 2,760 4.6% 6.5% 5 Taiwan 130 5.6% 715 1.2% 18.2% 6 United States 110 4.8% 1,080 1.8% 10.2% 7 Saudi Arabia 110 4.8% 1,160 1.9% 9.5% 8 Iran 80 3.4% 1,205 2.0% 6.6% 9 United Kingdom 50 2.1% 610 1.0% 8.2% 10 Poland 45 1.9% 1,800 3.0% 2.5% All other places 530 23.1% 28,385 47.2% 1.9% Total 2,290 100.0% 60,125 100.0% 3.8% Table 6 - Place of Birth for Immigrants Arriving Between 1996 and 2001

February 2004 City of, Planning and Building Department Page 5 Period of Immigration Table 7 - Total Population by Immigration Characteristics Table 7a - Total Immigrant Population by Period of Immigration % % Before 1961 660 4.9% 21,695 7.6% 3.0% 1961-1970 1,385 10.3% 33,680 11.8% 4.1% 1971-1980 2,775 20.6% 50,650 17.7% 5.5% 1981-1990 3,185 23.7% 65,470 22.9% 4.9% 1991-1995 3,150 23.4% 54,020 18.9% 5.8% 1996-2001 2,295 17.1% 60,125 21.1% 3.8% Total 13,445 100.0% 285,640 100.0% 4.7% Table 7b - Total Immigrant Population by Age at Immigration 0-4 years 1,255 9.3% 24,550 8.6% 5.1% 5-19 years 3,875 28.8% 80,655 28.2% 4.8% 20 years and over 8,315 61.9% 180,435 63.2% 4.6% Total 13,445 100.0% 285,640 100.0% 4.7% Table 7c - Total Population 15 Years of Age and Over by Generation Status Generation status refers to when a respondent or the respondent's ancestors become residents of Canada. The 1st generation refers to an individual born outside of Canada who represents the first generation to live in Canada. The 2nd generation refers to an individual whose parents were born outside of Canada and the 3rd generation and over refers to individuals with grandparents or previous ancestors born outside of Canada. 1st generation 12,750 57.3% 270,270 56.3% 4.7% 2nd generation 4,930 22.2% 100,635 21.0% 4.9% 3rd generation and over 4,550 20.5% 108,790 22.7% 4.2% Total 22,225 100.0% 479,700 100.0% 4.6% Table 8 - Total Population by Selected Religions Religion refers to specific religious denominations, groups or bodies as well as to sects, cults or other religiously defined communities or systems of belief. Rank Religion % % 1 Roman Catholic 11,435 39.0% 252,195 41.3% 4.5% 2 No Religion 4,390 15.0% 71,895 11.8% 6.1% 3 Muslim 2,285 7.8% 41,840 6.9% 5.5% 4 Anglican 1,790 6.1% 37,250 6.1% 4.8% 5 Hindu 1,780 6.1% 29,165 4.8% 6.1% 6 United Church 1,480 5.0% 37,940 6.2% 3.9% 7 Sikh 995 3.4% 23,425 3.8% 4.2% 8 Buddhist 835 2.8% 11,600 1.9% 7.2% 9 Christian n.i.e. 1 825 2.8% 17,990 2.9% 4.6% 10 Baptist 505 1.7% 11,350 1.9% 4.4% 1 n.i.e. - not included elsewhere

Page 6 City of, Planning and Building Department February 2004 Visible Minority Group Table 9 - Visible Minority Population Visible minority refers to the visible minority group to which the respondent belongs. It is defined by the Employment Equity Act as "persons other than Aboriginal peoples, who are non-caucasian in race or non-white in colour." % % South Asian 4,835 16.5% 91,145 14.9% 5.3% Chinese 3,910 13.3% 35,950 5.9% 10.9% Black 1,370 4.7% 37,850 6.2% 3.6% Filipino 920 3.1% 24,620 4.0% 3.7% Arab 705 2.4% 11,415 1.9% 6.2% Southeast Asian 345 1.2% 10,015 1.6% 3.4% West Asian 310 1.1% 4,205 0.7% 7.4% Korean 250 0.8% 5,170 0.9% 4.8% Japanese 220 0.8% 1,975 0.3% 11.1% Latin American 205 0.7% 9,265 1.5% 2.2% Visible minority, n.i.e. 1 360 1.2% 9,955 1.6% 3.6% Multiple visible minorities 205 0.7% 4,750 0.8% 4.3% All others 15,690 53.5% 364,405 59.7% 4.3% Total 29,325 100.0% 610,730 100.0% 4.8% Table 10 - Education Levels for Population 20 Years of Age and Over % % Less than grade 9 805 4.1% 32,360 7.4% 2.5% Grades 9 to 13 3,825 19.2% 116,800 26.8% 3.3% Without high school graduation certificate 1,645 8.3% 57,245 13.1% 2.9% With high school graduation certificate 2,175 10.9% 59,550 13.7% 3.7% Trades certificate or diploma 1,480 7.4% 38,440 8.8% 3.9% College 4,545 22.9% 103,885 23.9% 4.4% Without certificate or diploma 1,215 6.1% 29,020 6.7% 4.2% With certificate or diploma 3,330 16.8% 74,865 17.2% 4.4% University 9,215 46.4% 144,325 33.1% 6.4% Without degree 2,250 11.4% 39,495 9.1% 5.7% Without certificate or diploma 1,380 7.0% 25,250 5.8% 5.5% With certificate or diploma 875 4.4% 14,245 3.3% 6.1% With bachelor's degree or higher 6,960 35.0% 104,825 24.0% 6.6% Total 19,875 100.0% 435,810 100.0% 4.6% 1 n.i.e. - not included elsewhere

February 2004 City of, Planning and Building Department Page 7 Table 11 - Population by Marital Status Table 11a - Total Population 15 Years of Age and Over by Legal Marital Status % % Never legally married (single) 6,335 28.5% 144,860 30.2% 4.4% Legally married (and not separated) 13,930 62.7% 275,180 57.3% 5.1% Separated, but still legally married 485 2.2% 13,900 2.9% 3.5% Divorced 825 3.7% 25,285 5.3% 3.3% Widowed 645 2.9% 20,480 4.3% 3.1% Total 22,225 100.0% 479,700 100.0% 4.6% Table 11b - Total Population 15 Years of Age and Over by Common-law Status Not in a common law relationship 21,545 96.9% 458,040 95.5% 4.7% In a common law relationship 680 3.1% 21,660 4.5% 3.1% Total 22,225 100.0% 479,700 100.0% 4.6% Table 12 - Total Couple Families by Family Structure % % Married couples 6,910 95.4% 135,085 92.6% 5.1% Without children at home 1,585 21.9% 38,880 26.7% 4.1% With children at home 5,325 73.5% 96,205 65.9% 5.5% 1 child 1,595 22.0% 31,580 21.6% 5.1% 2 children 2,575 35.5% 44,265 30.3% 5.8% 3 or more children 1,155 16.0% 20,360 14.0% 5.7% Common-law couples 340 4.6% 10,825 7.4% 3.1% Without children at home 170 2.3% 6,000 4.1% 2.8% With children at home 170 2.3% 4,820 3.3% 3.5% 1 child 65 0.9% 2,310 1.6% 2.8% 2 children 70 0.9% 1,795 1.2% 3.9% 3 or more children 35 0.5% 715 0.5% 4.9% Total 7,245 100.0% 145,910 100.0% 5.0% Table 13 - Lone Parent Families by Sex of Parent % % Female parent 740 83.6% 20,540 83.4% 3.6% 1 child 375 42.4% 12,135 49.3% 3.1% 2 children 275 31.1% 6,120 24.8% 4.5% 3 or more children 90 10.1% 2,285 9.3% 3.9% Male parent 145 16.4% 4,100 16.6% 3.5% 1 child 95 10.7% 2,400 9.7% 4.0% 2 children 20 2.3% 1,320 5.4% 1.5% 3 or more children 30 3.4% 380 1.5% 7.9% Total 885 100.0% 24,635 100.0% 3.6% Numbers may not add due to adding.

Page 8 City of, Planning and Building Department February 2004 Table 14 - Total Number of Persons in Private Households Non- family persons refers to an individual not part of the census family group. Family persons are part of the census family group - which consists of a married couple (with or without children of either or both spouses), a couple living common-law (with or without children of either or both partners) or a lone parent of any marital status, with at least one child living in the same dwelling. % % Number of non-family persons 1,695 5.8% 60,010 9.8% 2.8% Living with relatives 700 2.4% 16,705 2.7% 4.2% Living with non-relatives only 325 1.1% 13,190 2.2% 2.5% Living alone 670 2.3% 30,110 4.9% 2.2% Number of family persons 27,630 94.2% 550,035 90.2% 5.0% Total 29,320 100.0% 610,045 100.0% 4.8% Table 15 - Total Number of Private Households by Household Size % % 1 person 670 7.9% 30,110 15.4% 2.2% 2 persons 1,805 21.3% 48,680 25.0% 3.7% 3 persons 1,670 19.7% 37,140 19.0% 4.5% 4-5 persons 3,675 43.4% 66,100 33.9% 5.6% 6 or more persons 650 7.7% 13,110 6.7% 5.0% Total 8,470 100.0% 195,145 100.0% 4.3% Average number of persons in private households 3.5-3.1 - - Table 16 - Total Number of Private Households by Household Type A one-family household consists of a single family (e.g., a couple with or without children). A multiple-family household is made up of two or more families occupying the same dwelling. A non-family household consists either of one person living alone or of two or more persons who share a dwelling, but do not constitute a family % % One-family households 7,200 85.0% 149,680 76.7% 4.8% Multiple-family households 455 5.4% 9,960 5.1% 4.6% Non-family households 815 9.6% 35,510 18.2% 2.3% Total 8,470 100.0% 195,145 100.0% 4.3%

February 2004 City of, Planning and Building Department Page 9 Table 17 - Total Number of Occupied Private Dwellings by Structural Type of Dwelling % % Single-detached house 5,315 62.7% 87,090 44.6% 6.1% Semi-detached house 585 6.9% 24,180 12.4% 2.4% Row house 2,160 25.5% 25,520 13.1% 8.5% Apartment, detached duplex 10 0.1% 1,580 0.8% 0.6% Apartment, building that has five or more storeys 270 3.2% 48,105 24.7% 0.6% Apartment, building that has fewer than five storeys 130 1.5% 8,085 4.1% 1.6% Other single-attached house 0 0.0% 160 0.1% 0.0% Movable dwelling 10 0.1% 425 0.2% 2.4% Total 8,470 100.0% 195,145 100.0% 4.3% Table 18 - Characteristics of Occupied Private Dwellings Table 18a - Private Dwellings by Tenure % % Owned 7,445 87.9% 140,095 71.8% 5.3% Rented 1,020 12.1% 55,050 28.2% 1.9% Total 8,470 100.0% 195,150 100.0% 4.3% Table 18b - Private Dwellings by Condition Regular maintenance only 7,385 87.2% 143,530 73.6% 5.1% Minor repairs 1,000 11.8% 41,585 21.3% 2.4% Major repairs 80 1.0% 10,030 5.1% 0.8% Total 8,470 100.0% 195,145 100.0% 4.3% Table 18c - Private Dwellings by Period of Construction Period of construction, before 1946 10 0.1% 3,380 1.7% 0.3% Period of construction, 1946-1960 15 0.2% 14,570 7.5% 0.1% Period of construction, 1961-1970 10 0.1% 29,485 15.1% 0.0% Period of construction, 1971-1980 65 0.8% 49,990 25.6% 0.1% Period of construction, 1981-1985 445 5.2% 23,060 11.8% 1.9% Period of construction, 1986-1990 1,980 23.4% 29,255 15.0% 6.8% Period of construction, 1991-1995 3,385 40.0% 22,515 11.6% 15.0% Period of construction, 1996-2001 2,555 30.2% 22,900 11.7% 11.2% Total 8,470 100.0% 195,145 100.0% 4.3% Table 18d - Cost of Tenant-occupied Dwellings Tenant-occupied households spending 30% or more of household income on shelter 365 4.3% 20,770 10.6% 1.8% Average gross rent $ $1,175 - $930 - - Table 18e - Cost of Owner-occupied Dwellings Owner-occupied households spending 30% or more of household income on shelter 1,500 17.7% 30,065 15.4% 5.0% Average value of dwelling $ $313,800 - $255,280 - - Average owner major payments $ $1,452 - $1,232 - -

Page 10 City of, Planning and Building Department February 2004 Table 19 - Population 15 Years and Over by Labour Force Activity % % Employed 15,415 69.3% 329,650 68.7% 4.7% Unemployed 795 3.6% 18,455 3.9% 4.3% Not in the labour force 6,015 27.1% 131,595 27.4% 4.6% Total 22,225 100.0% 479,700 100.0% 4.6% Unemployment rate 4.9-5.3 - - Table 20 - Total Labor Force by Industry Division The labour force by industry division is based on the 2001 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). % % Manufacturing 2,340 14.4% 61,780 17.7% 3.8% Professional,scientific and technical services 1,975 12.2% 29,475 8.5% 6.7% Retail trade 1,710 10.6% 38,555 11.1% 4.4% Wholesale trade 1,550 9.6% 27,240 7.8% 5.7% Finance and insurance 1,305 8.1% 22,450 6.4% 5.8% Healthcare and social assistance 1,255 7.7% 23,200 6.7% 5.4% Educational services 880 5.4% 16,470 4.7% 5.3% Transportation and warehousing 760 4.7% 24,055 6.9% 3.2% Other services (except public administration) 645 4.0% 13,935 4.0% 4.6% Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services 595 3.7% 15,690 4.5% 3.8% Accommodation and food services 590 3.6% 18,275 5.3% 3.2% Information and cultural industries 585 3.6% 11,165 3.2% 5.2% Construction 575 3.5% 15,320 4.4% 3.8% Public administration 475 2.9% 10,675 3.1% 4.4% Real estate and rental and leasing 410 2.5% 7,820 2.2% 5.2% Arts, entertainment and recreation 160 1.0% 4,390 1.3% 3.6% Utilities 110 0.7% 1,810 0.5% 6.1% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 25 0.2% 630 0.2% 4.0% Mining and oil and gas extraction 20 0.1% 340 0.1% 5.9% Management of companies and enterprises 10 0.1% 540 0.2% 1.9% Industry - Not applicable 220 1.4% 4,295 1.2% 5.1% Total 16,210 100.0% 348,110 100.0% 4.7%

February 2004 City of, Planning and Building Department Page 11 Table 21 - Total Labour Force by Occupation The labour force by occupation is based on the 2001 National Occupational Classification for Statistics. % % Business, finance and administration occupations 3,765 23.2% 78,055 22.4% 4.8% Management occupations 3,390 20.9% 46,055 13.2% 7.4% Sales and service occupations 2,910 18.0% 73,305 21.1% 4.0% Natural and applied sciences and related occupations 1,695 10.5% 29,535 8.5% 5.7% Trades, transport and equipment operators and related occupations 1,315 8.1% 43,920 12.6% 3.0% Social science, education, government service and religion 1,115 6.9% 20,275 5.8% 5.5% Health occupations 750 4.6% 13,275 3.8% 5.6% Processing, manufacturing and utilities 635 3.9% 29,890 8.6% 2.1% Art, culture, recreation and sport 330 2.1% 7,475 2.2% 4.4% Primary industry 80 0.5% 2,025 0.6% 4.0% Occupation - Not applicable 215 1.3% 4,295 1.2% 5.0% Total 16,210 100.0% 348,110 100.0% 4.7% Table 22 - Total Employed Labour Force by Mode of Transportation % % Car, truck, van, as driver 11,220 79.6% 231,240 74.7% 4.9% Public transit 1,550 11.0% 45,530 14.7% 3.4% Car, truck, van, as passenger 905 6.4% 21,915 7.1% 4.1% Walked 310 2.2% 7,940 2.6% 3.9% Other method 85 0.6% 1,420 0.5% 6.0% Bicycle 10 0.1% 825 0.3% 1.2% Taxicab 10 0.1% 420 0.1% 2.4% Motorcycle 0 0.0% 105 0.0% 0.0% Total 14,095 100.0% 309,395 100.0% 4.6%

February 2004 City of, Planning and Building Department Page 12 Table 23 - Household Income in 2000 of All Private Households Household income is the sum of the total incomes of all members of that household. Total income is calculated from all sources, including employment income, income from government programs, pension income, investment income and any other money. Category % % Under $10,000 230 2.7% 7,205 3.7% $ 10,000 - $19,999 250 3.0% 11,100 5.7% $ 20,000 - $29,999 345 4.1% 13,335 6.8% $ 30,000 - $39,999 510 6.0% 16,940 8.7% $ 40,000 - $49,999 560 6.6% 17,505 9.0% $ 50,000 - $59,999 465 5.5% 17,410 8.9% $ 60,000 - $69,999 610 7.2% 17,685 9.1% $ 70,000 - $79,999 630 7.4% 16,025 8.2% $ 80,000 - $89,999 615 7.3% 14,310 7.3% $ 90,000 - $99,999 640 7.6% 12,010 6.2% $100,000 and over 3,605 42.6% 51,620 26.4% Total 8,470 100.0% 195,145 100.0% Average household income $105,786 - $80,442 - Table 24 - Individual Income in 2000 by Population 15 Years of Age and Over Table 25 - Individual Average Individual income is the total income from all sources, including employment income, income from government programs, pension income, investment income and any other money income. Category % % Without income 1,620 7.3% 28,815 6.0% Under $1,000 1,085 4.9% 21,165 4.4% $ 1,000 - $ 2,999 1,075 4.8% 20,475 4.3% $ 3,000 - $ 4,999 735 3.3% 16,685 3.5% $ 5,000 - $ 6,999 805 3.6% 17,480 3.6% $ 7,000 - $ 9,999 900 4.0% 23,495 4.9% $10,000 - $11,999 660 3.0% 16,760 3.5% $12,000 - $14,999 1,010 4.5% 25,600 5.3% $15,000 - $19,999 1,075 4.8% 33,225 6.9% $20,000 - $24,999 1,170 5.3% 31,995 6.7% $25,000 - $29,999 1,015 4.6% 31,880 6.6% $30,000 - $34,999 1,225 5.5% 36,375 7.6% $35,000 - $39,999 1,335 6.0% 29,910 6.2% $40,000 - $44,999 1,080 4.9% 27,775 5.8% $45,000 - $49,999 920 4.1% 20,065 4.2% $50,000 - $59,999 1,570 7.1% 31,965 6.7% $60,000 and over 4,950 22.3% 66,025 13.8% Total 22,225 100.0% 479,700 100.0% Income (Age 15 Years and Over) Male $55,576 $43,010 Female $31,394 $26,845 Average Income see Table 25. Refers to the average total money received from the following sources during calendar year 2000 by persons 15 years of age and over: wages and salaries; net farm income; net non-farm income from unincorporated business and/or professional practice; federal Child Tax benefits; Old Age Security pension and Guaranteed Income Supplement; benefits from Canada or Quebec Pension Plan; benefits from Unemployment Insurance; other income from government sources; dividends, interest on bonds, deposits and savings certificates, and other investment income; retirement pensions; superannuation and annuities, including those from RRSPs and RRIFs; other money income. The data presented in this community profile is from a custom tabulation of 2001 Census of Canada data prepared for the City of by Statistics Canada. It is calculated from 20% sample data. This data does not include the institutional population or the 4.0% census undercount. For further information on the City of please visit our website at www.mississauga.ca