FRR Alternative. Jeff Bastian Manager, Capacity Market Operations Market Implementation Committee April 10, 2019 PJM

Similar documents
DR CP Penalty Review. DRS July 20, 2016

Balancing Ratio Proposals

Capacity Performance Transition Incremental Auctions Rules, Schedule and Planning Parameters

PJM Analysis. CCPPSTF July 17, PJM 2017

Balancing Ratio Determination Issue

Market Seller Offer Cap Balancing Ratio Issue

Market Seller Offer Cap Balancing Ratio Proposal

PJM Analysis. CCPPSTF August 2, PJM 2017

5.14 Installed Capacity Spot Market Auction and Installed Capacity Supplier Deficiencies LSE Participation in the ICAP Spot Market Auction

Reliability Pricing Model

Balancing Ratio Determination

Comparison of Performance-Based Capacity Models in ISO-NE and PJM June 2, 2016

PJM Reliability Pricing Model

{TEXT OMITTED} 6. MARKET POWER MITIGATION. Sixth Revised Volume No. 1

Capacity Auction Clearing with Resource Specific FRR

Energy Efficiency in Wholesale Markets: ISO-NE, PJM, MISO

2016/2017 RPM Capacity Performance Transition Incremental Auction Results

Overview of the Forward Capacity Market ( FCM ) ISO New England Inc.

h) Minimum Offer Price Rule for Certain Generation Capacity Resources for Generation Capacity Resources

This section addresses the specific timeline, format and mechanics for a base auction

Installed Capacity (ICAP) Market

Proposed Reserve Market Enhancements

Appendix B-2. Term Sheet for Tolling Agreements. for For

5.2 Transmission Congestion Credit Calculation Eligibility.

1 Overview of the Alberta Capacity Market

5.2 Transmission Congestion Credit Calculation Eligibility.

Market Settlements - Advanced

Installed Capacity (ICAP) Market Introduction

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Supplement No. 611 to P.S.C. Md. E-6: Rider 2 Electric Efficiency Charge, Rider 15 Demand Response Service Charge and Rider 26 Peak Time Rebate Charge

Incorporation of Losses in Retail Prices Set by Auction

Installed Capacity (ICAP) Market

ROCKLAND ELECTRIC COMPANY PROPOSAL FOR BASIC GENERATION SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO BE PROCURED EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2016

Overview of the New ICAP In-City Mitigation Rules

NYISO Administered ICAP Market Auctions

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ( PJM ), under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act

BUYER SIDE MITIGATION NARRATIVE AND NUMERICAL EXAMPLE

Five-Minute Settlements Education

Coverage and claim details Forage rainfall plan

2018/2019 Planning Resource Auction Results. Resource Adequacy Subcommittee May 9, 2018

ICAP Demand Curve. Zachary T. Smith Supervisor, ICAP Market Operations, NYISO. Intermediate ICAP Course. November 7-8, 2017 Rensselaer, NY 12144

Defining Generator Outage States DRAFT Tariff Proposed Amendments. Shaded material in blue text is updated since the 2/12/14 BIC.

Demand Response energy settlements

Alberta Capacity Market

Generation Adequacy through Call Option Obligations: Safe Passage to the Promised Land

5 Minute Settlements. Ray Fernandez Manager, Market Settlements Development Market Settlements Subcommittee November 10,

MISO Competitive Retail Solution: Analysis of Reliability Implications

D. RSCP SUPPLIER PAYMENTS AND CUSTOMER RATES

The deadline for stakeholder consensus on recommendations is August 31, 2014, with a FERC filing deadline of October 1, 2014.

TRANSMISSION OWNER ZONAL PLACEMENT PROCESS

Long Term FTR Market Education

Alberta Capacity Market

CCE3 Workshop: DRAM Pilots

Financial Transmission and Auction Revenue Rights

Brooklyn Queens Demand Management Demand Response Forum

Operating Agreement Redlines

Congestion Revenue Rights Auction Efficiency Track 1B Draft Tariff Language

Financial Transmission and Auction Revenue Rights

ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT GG NETWORK UPGRADE CHARGE

Transmission Cost Allocation

Gray proposed revisions for CEE, Renewable Generator Exemption, Municipal Utilities Exemption

LSE Perspective on FTR and ARR Surplus Funds. Jeff Whitehead Direct Energy

Supply Participation. 2.1 Prequalification applications. Rationale

Exelon s Price-Based Materiality Screen. PJM CCPPSTF September 11 12, 2017

Tier 2 Synchronized Reserves Performance Educational Materials. May 29, 2013

7.3 Auction Procedures Role of the Office of the Interconnection.

ROCKLAND ELECTRIC COMPANY PROPOSAL FOR BASIC GENERATION SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO BE PROCURED EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2018

Organized Regional Wholesale Markets

Section T: Settlement and Trading Charges. how Trading Charges for each Trading Party and National Grid are determined;

6 Rebalancing Auctions

6 Rebalancing Auctions

MEMORANDUM The FERC Order on Proposed Changes to ISO-NE s Forward Capacity Market

15. Demand Response Service

Brooklyn Queens Demand Management Demand Response Webinar

Financial Transmission and Auction Revenue Rights

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Resource Adequacy and Managing Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets

Comverge Qualifications

Financial Transmission and Auction Revenue Rights

Tom Chamberlin. Tom Chamberlin. Brian DeBruin Forced Outage Risk Solutions, Managing Director Aon Global Power. Marina Nadirova Product Executive

JOSEPH A. HOLTMAN - ELECTRIC. 1 Q. Please state your name, title, employer and business. 4 Electricity Supply for Consolidated Edison Company of

NYISO 2016 Annual Report on Demand Response Programs

Cost Allocation Principles for Seams Transmission Expansion Projects

Congestion Revenue Rights Settlement Rule

History of Cost Allocation within MISO RECB TF. January 29, 2015

CEO Presentation. Curt Morgan Chief Executive Officer

P a g e 1. for the state and EDC where the service is being provided such as, but not limited to: Generation Charge,

GATS Subscriber Group Meeting

Flexible Capacity Procurement. Market and Infrastructure Policy Issue Paper

CAISO. Settlements & Billing. CRR Hourly Settlement CC 6700

WS RES und Strat. Reserve

PG&E Supply-side Pilot Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Order Minute Settlements

Rational Buyer. Ancillary Service Rational Buyer Adjustment. Description. Purpose. Charge Calculation and Calculation Components

From: Chuck Goldman (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Snuller Price, Richard Sedano (Regulatory Assistance Project)

Price Formation and Reserve Markets

FTR Alignment. Joint Stakeholder Meeting June 6, 2008

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Explanatory note data publication Front Report

9. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISO AND PARTICIPATING TOs. Each Participating TO shall enter into a Transmission Control Agreement with the

Transcription:

FRR Alternative Jeff Bastian Manager, Capacity Market Operations Market Implementation Committee April 10, 2019

FRR Alternative The Fixed Resource Requirement ( FRR ) Alternative provides an alternative means for an eligible LSE to satisfy its obligation to commit Unforced Capacity to ensure reliable service to loads in the PJM How it differs from RPM: FRR LSE does not pay RPM Locational Reliability Charge Capacity resources included in an LSE s FRR Capacity Plan do not receive RPM Auction Credits Provisions of the FRR Alternative are described in Schedule 8.1 of the Reliability Assurance Agreement (RAA) 2

FRR Alternative Eligibility A party is eligible to select the FRR Alternative if it (a) is an IOU, Electric Cooperative, or Public Power Entity, and (b) demonstrates the capability to satisfy the Unforced Capacity obligation for all load in the FRR Service Area, including all expected load growth in such area, for the term of such party s participation in the FRR Alternative 3

The service territory of an IOU; The service area of a Public Power Entity or Electric Cooperative; or A separately identifiable geographic area that is: FRR Service Area bounded by wholesale metering, or similar appropriate multi-site aggregate metering, that is visible to, and regularly reported to, PJM, or to an Electric Distributor, and such Electric Distributor agrees to aggregate the load data for such FRR Service Area and regularly report such aggregated information, by FRR Service Area, to PJM; and for which the FRR Entity has or assumes the obligation to provide capacity for all load (including load growth) within such area In a state regulatory jurisdiction that has implemented retail choice, the FRR Entity must include all load in the FRR Service Area, notwithstanding the loss of any such load to or among alternative retail LSEs 4

Participation Requirements No later than four months prior to the BRA for the first Delivery Year ( DY ) for which an FRR election is to be effective, any party seeking to elect the FRR Alternative shall notify PJM of such election Such election is for a minimum term of five consecutive DYs No Later than one month prior to the BRA, such party shall submit its initial FRR Capacity Plan, and shall annually extend and update the plan by no later than one month prior to the BRA for each succeeding DY 5

Termination of FRR Election An FRR Entity may terminate its FRR election effective with any DY following the minimum term of five consecutive DYs By providing written notice of termination no later than two months prior to the BRA of such DY An FRR Entity that has terminated FRR election is not eligible to re-elect the FRR Alternative for five years An FRR Entity may terminate its FRR election prior to the five year commitment term without penalty for any DY after the first DY of its five year commitment for which PJM is required to establish a separate VRR Curve for an LDA encompassing the FRR Service Area A party may elect or terminate the FRR Alternative effective any DY in the event of a State Regulatory Structural Change as defined in the RAA 6

FRR Capacity Plan Unforced Capacity Obligation The FRR Capacity Plan of each FRR Entity must commit Capacity Resources in a MW quantity no less than the FRR Entity s Unforced Capacity ( UCAP ) Obligation calculated as the Forecast Pool Requirement ( FPR ) times the FRR Entity s allocated share of the Zonal Peak Load Forecast for such DY For FRR load located in an LDA for which a separate VRR Curve is required to be established, the FRR Entity must commit Capacity Resources located inside the LDA in a MW quantity no less than that calculated as the Percentage Internal Resources Required times the FRR Entity s UCAP Obligation 7

FRR Capacity Plan Minimum Internal Resource Requirement The Percentage Internal Resource Required is calculated as the (LDA Reliability Requirement minus the LDA CETL) divided by the (Zonal Peak Load Forecast times the FPR) where all parameters are of the relevant DY An FRR Entity may reduce the Percentage Internal Resource Required associated with an LDA to the extent the FRR Entity commits to a transmission upgrade that increases the CETL of the LDA The FRR Entity shall designate specific additional Capacity Resources located in the LDA from which the CETL was increased, to the extent of such increase 8

FRR Capacity Plan Threshold Quantity If the FRR Entity intends to sell surplus Capacity Resources in any RPM auction, or to any direct or indirect purchaser that uses such resource as the basis of a sell offer into any RPM auction or as replacement for an RPM commitment, then the FRR Entity must commit an additional MW quantity of Capacity Resources above the MW quantity committed to satisfy the FRR Entity s UCAP Obligation This additional Threshold Quantity is calculated as the lesser of 3% of the FRR Entity s UCAP Obligation or 450 MW 9

FRR Capacity Plan Conditions on Sale of Capacity by FRR Entity If the Threshold Quantity is not satisfied, the FRR Entity cannot sell surplus capacity in any RPM auction, or to any direct or indirect purchaser that uses such resource as the basis of a sell offer into any RPM auction or as replacement for an RPM commitment The FRR Entity may sell surplus capacity off-system or to another FRR Entity If the Threshold Quantity is satisfied, the FRR Entity may sell capacity in excess of the Threshold Quantity up to a sales cap amount calculated as the lesser of 25% of the FRR Entity s UCAP Obligation or 1,300 MW 10

FRR Capacity Plan Eligible Capacity Resources The FRR Capacity Plan shall comprise only Capacity Performance ( CP ) Resources including Seasonal CP Resources The FRR Capacity Plan may not include any Capacity Resource that has cleared in any RPM auction for the relevant DY The UCAP MW quantity of each generation resource committed to the initial FRR Capacity Plan will, at the FRR Entity s election, be determined using either the resources 1-year or 5-year EFORd A generation resources final UCAP MW value is based on the resource s final effective 1-year EFORd 11

FRR Capacity Plan Eligible Capacity Resources (cont.) For DR intended to be committed in the FRR Capacity Plan, a DR Sell Offer Plan must be submitted 15 business days prior to the deadline for submitting the FRR Capacity Plan A Demand Resource s final UCAP MW Value is based on the total DY Nominated Value of DR registrations in DR HUB times the final DY FPR An FRR Entity s UCAP Obligation and Minimum Internal Resource Requirement is increased by the UCAP MW value of any EE Resource that is committed in the FRR Capacity Plan EE measures are already reflected in the peak load forecast that is used as the basis for the UCAP Obligation and the Minimum Internal Resource Requirement therefore this addback is needed to avoid double-counting of EE MWs 12

FRR Alternative Example The following example assumes that the FRR Alternative is elected for all load located in a zone and that the zonal load is wholly contained in a LDA and represents all of the load of the LDA Key Planning Parameters associated with FRR Service Area Zonal Peak Load Forecast = 21,000 MW FPR = 1.095 LDA Reliability Requirement = 26,000 MW LDA CETL = 5,500 MW 13

FRR Alternative Example (cont.) FRR Capacity Plan Requirements Zonal UCAP Obligation = (21,000 MW)(1.095) = 23,000 MW % Internal Resource Required = (26,000 MW - 5,500 MW) / 23,000 MW = 89.1% Min Internal Resource Required = (23,000 MW)(89.1%) = 20,500 MW Threshold Quantity = 450 MW, if FRR Entity intends to sell excess capacity RPM Sales Cap = 1,300 MW The FRR Capacity Plan of this example must commit Capacity Resources in a UCAP MW quantity no less than 23,000 MW, and, no less than 20,500 MW of this total commitment quantity must be of Capacity Resources located inside the LDA (plus 450 MW if the FRR Entity intends to sell excess into RPM). 14

RPM Locational Requirements If all of the load located in a LDA is included in a FRR Capacity Plan then locational reliability requirements are fully satisfied via the FRR Entity s Minimum Internal Resource Requirement therefore the LDA is not modeled using a separate LDA VRR Curve in the relevant BRA If any portion of the load located in a LDA is served through RPM then the LDA is modeled in the relevant BRA using a separate VRR Curve based on the LDA Reliability Requirement reduced by the total minimum internal resource requirement of all FRR Entities located in the LDA 15

RPM Participation by Capacity Resources located in a FRR Service Area but not Included in a FRR Capacity Plan Generation Capacity Resources and Demand Resources that are located in the FRR Service Area of an FRR Entity but that are not included in the FRR Entity s Capacity Plan are required/eligible to participate in RPM EE Resources located in the FRR Service Area of an FRR Entity may be committed in an FRR Entity s Capacity Plan where such commitment can be accommodated by a commensurate increase of the FRR Entity s UCAP Obligation and Minimum Internal Resource; however, such EE Resources may not participate in RPM due to the misalignment of the location of the EE measure and the location of the necessary add-back 16

Appendix

Appendix FRR Commitment Insufficiency Charge FRR Capacity Resource Deficiency Charge Capacity Performance Event Assessment 18

Commitment Insufficiency Charge FRR LSE must annually commit sufficient capacity for each succeeding Delivery Year. If the capacity is not adequate for a Delivery Year: the LSE will be assessed an FRR Commitment Insufficiency Charge for the shortage in meeting the Percentage of Internal Resources Required in LDA or the Preliminary Daily Unforced Capacity Obligations (including any Threshold Quantity) for the remainder of the minimum term of the FRR plan. 19

Commitment Insufficiency Charge FRR Commitment Insufficiency Charge = Two times the Cost of New Entry ($/MW- Year) Shortage of Unforced Capacity Resources FRR Commitment Insufficiency Charge is allocated to LSEs that were charged RPM Locational Reliability Charge. 20

Capacity Resource Deficiency Charge FRR LSE will pay a Capacity Resource Deficiency Charge for any shortage of resources to meet the Amount of Internal Resources Required in an LDA and the Final Daily Unforced Capacity Obligation. Shortage to meet the Internal Resources Required is calculated by comparing an LSE s daily LDA FRR Resource Position to its Internal Resources Required. Any shortage will be assessed a FRR Capacity Resource Deficiency Charge. A deficiency charge for this shortage less the shortage calculated for failure to satisfy the Internal Resources Required in the LDA will be assessed. FRR Capacity Resource Deficiency Charge = 1.2 * Weighted Average Resource Clearing Prices from all RPM auctions for the LDA encompassing the FRR Service Area, weighted based on quantities cleared in auction (in $/MW-Day) Shortage Amount (MW) 21

Allocation of Deficiency Charges The Daily FRR Capacity Resource Deficiency Charges, FRR Transmission Upgrade Delay Penalties, Generation Resource Rating Test Failure Charges and Load Management Test Failure Charges are distributed pro-rata to the LSEs in the RTO that were charged an RPM Locational Reliability Charge, based on LSE daily unforced capacity obligations. 22

Physical vs Financial CP Event Penalties Prior to the start of each Delivery Year, the FRR entity must elect whether it seeks to be subject to the Non-Performance Charge or to physical non-performance assessments for such Delivery Year. An FRR Entity may not elect the physical non-performance assessment option if such FRR Entity will not be an FRR Entity for the following Delivery Year. If such FRR Entity opted to be subject to physical non-performance assessments, the FRR Entity will be required to update their FRR Capacity Plan for the following Delivery Year with additional MW of Capacity Performance Resources for each MW of FRR net Performance Shortfall for each Performance Assessment Interval Such FRR Entity shall not be eligible for, or subject to, Bonus Performance Credits 23

Financial CP Event Penalties An FRR Entity that elected to be subject to financial non-performance assessment will be subject to Non-Performance Assessment Charge for each resource committed to the FRR Capacity Plan that had a Performance Shortfall for a Performance Assessment Interval. If a resource committed to the FRR Capacity Plan had Bonus Performance for a Performance Assessment Interval, such resource will be eligible for Bonus Performance Credits. 24

Physical CP Event Penalties The FRR Entity s net Performance Shortfall for each Performance Assessment Interval shall by multiplied by a rate of 0.00139 MWs/ Performance Assessment Interval [i.e., 0.5 MWs/30 PAHs/12 intervals per hour]] to establish the additional MW of Capacity Performance Resources that such FRR Entity must add to its FRR Capacity Plan for the following Delivery Year. The maximum additional MW required by the FRR Entity as a result of non-performance from the FRR Entity s Capacity Performance Resources during a Delivery Year shall not exceed 50% of the MW quantity of the Capacity Performance Resources committed in the FRR Capacity Plan for such Delivery Year. 25