SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW NOW

Similar documents
What Real Estate Lawyers Need to Know About the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Legal Alert: Congress Passes The Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

KERNS, PITROF, FROST & PEARLMAN, L.L.C.

Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson August 26, 2003

This memorandum updates and supersedes our similarly titled memorandum dated January 10, 2003.

Act language and concepts. David T. Mittelman

The final rules are described in SEC Release Nos , and IC (the 302 Release ).

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND THE IMPACT ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND ITS NEW RULES FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT OCTOBER 3, 2002 WALTER A. LOONEY S IMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

ARNOLD & PORTER ADVISORY

Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: 2004 Update for Non-U.S. Issuers.

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Summary of Key Provisions of Interest to Internal Auditors

SARBANES-OXLEY: A BRIEF OVERVIEW. On July 30, 2002, the United States Congress passed, by a nearly unanimous

'DYLV3RON :DUGZHOO /H[LQJWRQ$YHQXH 1HZ<RUN1< Re: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act CEO and CFO Certification Requirements

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT PERIODIC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR U.S. ISSUERS OVERVIEW

Congress Passes the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SARAH E. COGAN, CYNTHIA COBDEN, BRYNN D. PELTZ, DAVID E. WOHL & MARISA VAN DONGEN

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Impact on and Considerations for Financial Institutions

amend the text of the certifications required under Section 302 of the Act; and

Nova Law Review. Sarbanes-Oxley: A Primer for Public Companies, and Their Officers and Directors, and Audit Firms. Robert C.

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002: Special Considerations for Reporting Issuers that Use MJDS

In summary, CEOs and CFOs of public companies are potentially subject to three separate certification requirements:

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, ETHICAL CONDUCT AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURES IN THE POST-ENRON ERA ---- CHANGING THE WAY CORPORATE AMERICA OPERATES

CRS Report for Congress

Legal Alert: Sarbanes-Oxley Act Certification Requirements and Best Practices September 12, I. Introduction

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Reporting Readiness Considerations

SEC ADOPTS NEW CEO/CFO CERTIFICATION RULES PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 SEPTEMBER 6, 2002

Dodd-Frank Application of Corporate Governance, Securities Reform and Disclosure Requirements to Public Companies

Fiduciary Duty, Corporate Scandals, SOX and the Non-For-Profit

SARBANES OXLEY OVERVIEW

Introduction. Learning Objectives. Slide 1 F I F T E E N T H E D I T I O N. Slide 2. Slide 3

Sarbanes-Oxley Update: Impact on Public Companies, Management, and Audit Committees. W. Lynn Loden Deloitte & Touche LLP

SOX. A Compilation of Selected Bulletins Prepared to Assist Companies in Complying with The Act and The Commission s New Rules

A Director s Guide to the Final Nasdaq Corporate Governance Rules. Table of Contents. Introduction and Use of this Guide.. 3

Comparison of the Frank and Dodd Bills

SEC Financial Reporting Series SEC quarterly reports Form 10-Q

Co r p o r at e a n d

Corporate Governance After the Dodd-Frank Act: Recent Developments

8/20/2002. Changes from the Initial NYSE Proposal Morrison & Foerster LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Dodd-Frank Corporate Governance

Sarbanes-Oxley Simplified

SEC Adopts Rules on Provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Audit and Risk Committee Charter

Foreign Private Issuers and the Corporate Governance and Disclosure Provisions

GENESCO INC. CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Federal Financial Agencies Propose New Regulations on Executive Compensation: Here Is What You Need to Know

MATTEL, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

VIRTU FINANCIAL, INC. DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES POLICY. (adopted by the Board of Directors on April 3, 2015)

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Regulation BTR Regulation G Attorney Conduct Rules

Incentive Compensation for Financial Institutions: Reproposal and Its Impact on Regional Banks

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Loans and Blackout Periods. Post Date: 9/13/02

Understanding and Complying with the Sarbanes- Oxley and NYSE and Nasdaq Requirements Affecting Audit Committees

Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act

INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

ENER-CORE, INC. DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. Adopted September 24, analyzed to determine whether disclosure is appropriate; and

AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER *

WSGR ALERT PRESIDENT TO SIGN FINANCIAL OVERHAUL BILL. Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Update. I. Corporate Governance

CONDUCTING INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS GATHERING EVIDENCE AND PROTECTING YOUR COMPANY

SARBANES-OXLEY UPDATE. I. Disclosure of Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements... 2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Audit Committee Charter

AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF ETHICS FOR APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION

On 7/30/02 President Bush signed

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT JOINT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF FIFTH THIRD BANCORP AND FIFTH THIRD BANK

SEC Issues Rules for CEO/CFO Certifications of Quarterly and Annual Reports and Internal Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Sarbanes Oxley Act and non-us issuers: Considerations for international companies

ARNOLD & PORTER UPDATE

LIFETIME BRANDS, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

A Fiduciary Duty for Broker-Dealers?

INSIDER TRADING POLICY

2006 NON PROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER. August 2006

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Insider Trading Policy

eskbook Emerging Life Sciences Companies second edition Chapter 3 Corporate Governance Issues

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SOX, Corporate Governance and Working with the Board

MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER. Effective January 26, 2015

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT PERIODIC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR U.S. ISSUERS PRINCIPAL EXCHANGE ACT REPORTS

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

POLICY STATEMENT ON TRADING IN SECURITIES OF DOMTAR CORPORATION. [Amended and Restated as of August 2, 2016]

Sarbanes-Oxley Affects Your Private Company Clients

SEC Adopts Rules Regarding Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Updated

Corporate Officers & Directors Liability

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER OF KBR, INC. (as of December 7, 2016)

Chapter Four. AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Copyright 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Requirements for Public Company Boards

SEC Releases Final Section 16 Reporting Rules

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

BATS EXCHANGE, INC. RULES OF BATS EXCHANGE, INC. (Updated as of November 25, 2011)

PERSHING RESOURCES COMPANY INC. Adopted as of April 9, All Employees, Officers and Directors, and Contractors

Sarbanes Oxley Primer For The Small Law Department

SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (PL ) AND IMPACT ON THE IT AUDITOR

Q&A on the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC.

TCG BDC II, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER. the quality and integrity of the Company s financial statements;

Whistleblowing in the Dodd- Frank Era: The Perfect Storm

GRANITE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, LLC. Investment Adviser Code of Ethics

Code of Ethics. JPG Wealth Management, LLC Shepherds Lane NE Atlanta, Georgia 30324

Vycor Medical, Inc. Audit Committee Charter

Transcription:

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW NOW On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, one of the most sweeping revisions of the federal securities laws in the last 60 years. Sarbanes-Oxley creates a significant, new oversight and regulatory regime over the public accounting industry and imposes many important and potentially far-reaching reforms in public company governance and disclosure requirements. It also dramatically increases criminal penalties for federal mail, wire and securities fraud, creates new criminal penalties for document and record destruction in connection with federal investigations and lengthens the statute of limitations for private securities claims. Many of the provisions in the Act will go into effect only after rulemaking by the Securities and Exchange Commission or after other delays. Some crucial provisions, however, go into effect immediately and may require quick action by U.S. companies and foreign private issuers subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Key reforms taking effect immediately (or within the next 30 days) that may require quick action include: New CEO and CFO certification requirement. U.S. and foreign reporting companies must now provide CEO and CFO certifications with their next SEC filing containing financial statements under Section 906 of the Act (the 906 Certificate ). This new certification requirement is different from, and in addition to, the one-time certification requirement pursuant to the SEC s June 27 order applicable to the 947 U.S. public companies with revenues over $1.2 billion (the June 27 Order ). It is also different from, and in addition to, the new, ongoing CEO and CFO certification of quarterly and annual reports that Section 302 of the Act directs the SEC to adopt by rulemaking within 30 days (the 302 Certificate ). Prohibition on new loans to directors and executive officers. U.S. and foreign reporting companies are now prohibited from extending most types of personal loans to their directors and executive officers (and their equivalents ). Existing loans are grandfathered under the Act, but may not be materially modified or renewed. Acceleration of Section 16 reports. Effective August 30, 2002, directors, officers and 10% shareholders of U.S. public companies must file their Form 4 reports of transactions in company securities by the second business day after execution. This memorandum discusses these and other important provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley that merit immediate attention.

CEO and CFO Certification Requirements The Act includes two provisions relating to CEO and CFO certifications of periodic reports filed with the SEC. One, the 906 Certificate, is effective immediately; the other, the 302 Certificate, will become effective upon adoption of rules by the SEC, which must occur no later than August 30, 2002. Section 906 of the Act creates a new CEO/CFO certification requirement in connection with all periodic reports that contain financial statements. This section is effective immediately and so applies to the filing of any such report (e.g., Form 10-Q, Form 10-K, Form 20-F, Form 40-F) on or after July 30, 2002. Under this section, CEOs and CFOs are obligated to certify that the periodic report fully complies with SEC requirements, and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer. Section 906 also provides for criminal penalties ranging from up to $1 million in fines and up to 10 years in prison for filing a 906 Certificate knowing that the subject report does not comport with all the requirements of Section 906, to up to $5 million and up to 20 years if the officer willfully certifies a report knowing that the subject report does not comport with all the requirements of Section 906. The 302 Certificate will only become effective after SEC rulemaking, which is mandated to occur by August 30, 2002. These rules will require the CEO and CFO of U.S. and foreign reporting companies to certify, in connection with each quarterly and annual filing, that: (1) the signing officer has reviewed the report; (2) based on the officer s knowledge, the report does not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which the statements were made, not misleading; (3) based on the officer s knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer; (4) the signing officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls and have designed them to ensure discovery of material information; (5) the signing officers have evaluated the internal controls within the 90 days prior to the report and have presented their conclusions about the effectiveness of the internal controls in the report; (6) the signing officers have disclosed to the company s auditors and audit committee all significant deficiencies in the internal control system and any fraud (whether or not material) by management or other employees with a significant role in the internal controls; and (7) the signing officers have indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes in the internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect the controls since the date of their evaluation. Although similar in some ways to the one-time certification requirement imposed by the June 27 Order (see our client advice memorandum, dated July 2, 2002, available at www.dorseylaw.com), these two new certification requirements are separate obligations applicable to all companies filing periodic reports under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Thus, companies covered by the June 27 Order that have not yet filed their one-time certification will be providing two certifications: one pursuant to the June 27 Order (which is retrospective in its coverage), and a 906 Certificate (covering the most recently filed report which it accompanies), with a third form, the 302 Certificate (also covering the report with 2

which it will be filed), to be required in connection with reports filed after the SEC rulemaking in late August. Both Sections 302 and 906 apply to all companies filing periodic reports under Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. There is no exception made for non-u.s. issuers; therefore, foreign reporting companies now will also be required to submit 906 Certificates and 302 Certificates. The Act is silent on the mechanics for compliance with the certification requirements. Section 906 states that a company s reports shall be accompanied by the required certification. There is no further guidance on the means by which the Section 906 certification is to be provided. Form 10-Qs filed on July 31, 2002 (the first day after enactment of the Act) used two methods to comply with the requirement either including the certification language on the signature page of the Form, or filing one page certifications as exhibits 99 to the Form. We believe that there is another approach, which differs from either of the above methods, that reporting companies should consider: file two certifications (one each for the CEO and CFO) in EDGAR, tagged as correspondence, accompanying the Form, together with a simultaneous filing of a Form 8-K (or Form 6-K in the case of foreign reporting companies), attaching the two 906 Certificates as exhibits filed under Item 9 (the Regulation FD Item). By this means, the certifications will not be made part of the company s filing and do not become a separate basis for company liability under the Exchange Act while, at the same time, companies can avoid the risk of negative investor reaction to making the certifications in a non-public manner. Loans to Directors and Executive Officers Effective immediately, Section 402 of the Act prohibits any U.S. or foreign reporting company, as well as any private company that is in SEC registration for an IPO, from extending, maintaining, renewing or arranging for credit, directly or indirectly, in the form of personal loans to or for its directors and executive officers (or the equivalent thereof ). Although existing arrangements are grandfathered under the Act, there can be no material modification or any renewal of such arrangements after July 30, 2002. There are limited exceptions under the Act for certain consumer and housing loans and loans made in the ordinary course of business and at market rates by U.S. banks and broker-dealers to their own employees. While no guidance is set forth on the subject, it appears that standard forms of employee relocation loans are not exempted from the Act. Acceleration of Section 16 Reports Effective as of August 30, 2002, directors, officers and 10% shareholders of U.S. public companies will be required to file their Form 4 reports under Section 16 of the Exchange Act by the second business day after execution of a transaction, instead of by the tenth day of the month following the month in which the transaction occurs. U.S. public companies should revise their internal procedures now to capture transaction information more quickly in order to enable their directors and officers to comply with this new timeline. Section 403 of the Act also mandates 3

that, within one year of its enactment, all Form 4s must be filed electronically and made publicly available on the SEC s and the issuer s website. Potential Forfeiture of Incentive Compensation by CEOs and CFOs In addition to heightened personal certification requirements, CEOs and CFOs will now also face the possibility of a statutory clawback of all bonus and stock option exercise profits received in the 12 months following the first publication or filing with the SEC of financials subject to a restatement. Section 304 of the Act applies to any U.S. or foreign reporting company and to any private company that is in SEC registration for an IPO. If any such company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the issuer, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement, then the CEO and CFO will be required to forfeit any incentive or equity-based compensation received from the company, and the profit on any sales of issuer securities, during the 12-month period following release of the financial statements to be restated. This provision is effective immediately. It appears to apply retroactively to income and profits received by CEOs and CFOs during periods prior to July 30, 2002 if restatements meeting the standards of Section 304 subsequently occur. Whistleblower Protection Effective immediately, the Act prohibits U.S. and foreign reporting companies (and their officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors and agents) from taking any retaliatory action against an employee for commencing or participating in a legal proceeding based on, or providing information or assistance to supervisors, federal agencies or Congress with respect to an investigation of, conduct the employee reasonable believes violates U.S. securities or antifraud laws. Companies should review and update their personnel policies in light of the broad scope of this protection to ensure compliance with the Act. Pre-Approval of Non-Audit Services Although the Act includes independence requirements applicable to auditors which will become effective only after the newly mandated Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is in operation (which is to commence no later than the end of March 2003), the Act requires that, effective immediately, audit committees approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the company s outside auditors (subject to certain de minimis exceptions). Non-audit services include, for this purpose, the provision of tax services by the auditor. These approvals may be obtained at the time of engagement of the auditor for an annual audit, if the services are set forth as part of the annual audit plan. Any such approvals of non-audit services must also be disclosed in the company s periodic SEC reports. Enhanced SEC Review of Periodic Filings Section 408 of the Act requires the SEC to review periodic disclosures (including financial statements) made by U.S. and foreign reporting companies on a regular and systematic 4

basis, with each issuer being reviewed no less frequently than once every three years. Prior to Sarbanes-Oxley, foreign reporting company filings were not regularly reviewed by the staff, so this new requirement constitutes an especially important development for foreign private issuers. Officer and Director Bars Section 1105 of the Act gives the SEC explicit authority in administrative cease and desist proceedings to bar an individual who has violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws from acting as an officer or director of a reporting company if the person s conduct demonstrated unfitness to serve as an officer or director of a public company. In addition, Section 305 modifies the standard governing imposition of officer and director bars by a court (in actions brought by the SEC) by modifying the previous substantial unfitness standard to simple unfitness. Other Provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley Effective at Later Dates Other significant provisions of the Act become effective after SEC rulemaking to be completed during the next year. These provisions of the Act, which are generally applicable to U.S. and foreign reporting companies, include: Enhanced, real-time disclosure requirements. Section 409 of the Act will require disclosure of material changes in financial condition or operations on a rapid and current basis. Section 401 of the Act will require disclosure of material off-balance sheet arrangements and will govern the use of pro forma financial information in SEC reports and press releases. Annual report on internal controls. Section 404 of the Act will require issuers to provide an annual report assessing the effectiveness of the company s internal controls, together with a report by the company s auditors on this assessment. Code of ethics and financial expert. Sections 406 and 407, respectively, of the Act will require disclosure of whether the company has a code of ethics for its senior financial officers and whether the audit committee has at least one member who is a financial expert (as defined by the SEC). Auditors and audit committees. Titles I and II of the Act mandate the establishment of a new independent auditor oversight board with broad powers to investigate and sanction public accounting firms, require retention of audit records for a least seven years, limit non-audit services that may be provided by auditors and define director independence for purposes of audit committee participation. Insider trades during retirement plan blackouts. Section 306 of the Act will, subject to certain exceptions, make it unlawful for any director or executive officer of a company to trade in equity securities of the issuer during any blackout periods for an issuer 401(k) or other retirement plan in which participants are not allowed to trade. 5

Lawyer professional conduct rules. Section 307 of the Act will require the SEC to adopt ethics rules obligating all counsel appearing and practicing before the [SEC] in any way to report evidence of material violations of securities law or breach of fiduciary duty up the ladder to more senior management or the board of directors. We will address these and other Sarbanes-Oxley provisions more specifically in future memoranda as the SEC rulemaking process progresses and other developments and clarifications emerge. In the meantime, however, all U.S. and foreign reporting companies should be taking action in response to the immediately effective provisions of the Act. August 1, 2002 This memorandum is intended for general information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on any specific facts or circumstances. Members of the Dorsey & Whitney LLP Corporate Group will be pleased to provide further information regarding the matters discussed in this memorandum. 6