Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil No. 08-CV-2321-JLK COMMON CAUSE OF COLORADO, on behalf of itself and its members; MI FAMILIA VOTA EDUCATION FUND; and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, on behalf of itself and its members, vs. Plaintiffs, BERNIE BUESCHER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Colorado, Defendant. MOTION FOR STAY In light of newly-enacted and newly-proposed administrative rules that the Defendant filed on December 8, 2009, Plaintiffs believe that they are now in a position to negotiate a full settlement of Counts II and III of the Amended Complaint, and that (barring any substantial changes to the newly-proposed rules) they soon will be in a position to negotiate a full settlement of Count IV of the Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiffs hereby move for a partial stay of this case (including a stay of any dispositive motions deadlines) with respect to Counts II, III, and IV of the Complaint, to allow the parties an opportunity to negotiate a full settlement with respect to those claims following the conclusion of the rulemaking proceedings announced by Defendant on December 8, 2009. Plaintiffs anticipate that the rulemaking proceedings will conclude in early February 2010.
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 7 By their signatures below, Plaintiffs counsel hereby certify that they sought the consent of Defendants counsel with respect to this motion, but that Defendants stated that they were not willing to give consent and that they would respond separately to the motion. (See Letter from S. Brannon to M. Knaizer et al. Dated December 9, 2009, attached as Exhibit 1.) In further support of their motion, Plaintiffs state as follows: On December 8, 2009, the Defendant published a Notice of Adoption of Final Rules, and a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking relevant to the claims in this litigation. Specifically, the Notice of Adoption includes modifications and additions to existing Election Rules 2.19, 2.21, 2.22 and 2.23 that are relevant to Counts II and III of the Amended Complaint. A copy of that Notice of Adoption is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposes modifications and additions to Election Rules 2.18 and 2.20 that are relevant to Count IV of the Amended Complaint. A copy of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. Plaintiffs participated actively in the rulemaking process that produced these rules in the hopes that they would likely facilitate the settlement of Counts II, III, and IV. In light of the newly-released final rules and the proposed rules, Plaintiffs believe that they are now in a position to negotiate settlement of Counts II and Counts III of the Amended Complaint. In addition, if the proposed rules are adopted in substantial form as currently proposed, Plaintiffs would also be in a position to negotiate settlement of Count IV of the Amended Complaint. However, there are a number of items remaining to be discussed and resolved by way of settlement relating to these claims, including the nature and form of any declaratory and injunctive relief, the extent to which remedial relief may be necessary, and the extent to which attorneys fees and costs should be awarded to 2
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 7 Plaintiffs as prevailing parties. Given that the Secretary gave notice of these new and proposed rules only days ago and that the parties have been in the midst of preparing for the filing of dispositive motions relating (at a minimum) to the 20-day claim (Count I of the Amended Complaint), the parties have not had sufficient time to discuss and resolve all the issues that would be necessary for a settlement. Nonetheless, all parties have reaffirmed their willingness to do so in good faith as soon as possible. Given that the newly-adopted and currently-proposed rules would likely be sufficient to enable the parties to fully settle Counts II, III, and IV, Plaintiffs believe it would be counterproductive and contrary to the principles of judicial and litigation economy to have the parties submit lengthy briefs in support of and/or in opposition to dispositive motions relating to these claims. In the highly unlikely event that the parties cannot reach full settlement relating to these claims, Plaintiffs will be in a position to submit any dispositive motions related to these claims within a reasonable time following the lifting of the stay. 1 At this time, there does not appear to be any possibility of settlement as Count I of the Amended Complaint, related to the twenty-day rule. Plaintiffs, therefore, believe that it is appropriate to proceed with Summary Judgment briefing and deliberation as to this claim. Plaintiffs do not seek a stay as to Count I of the Amended Complaint and plan to submit a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment addressing this Count today. Plaintiffs do not believe that the stay requested herein would adversely impact the 2010 election cycle or impair Defendant s ability to prepare for these elections. Plaintiffs are not planning to seek any relief with respect to Counts II, III, and IV that would 1 Plaintiffs understand that Defendant is planning to submit his dispositive briefs on all claims today. However, in the event Defendant wishes to supplement his briefing on claims II, III, and IV after the stay is lifted, Plaintiffs would not oppose such supplementation. 3
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 7 unduly interfere with Defendant s ability to prepare for or conduct the 2010 elections. While it is possible that the parties will have disputes as to ancillary issues related to the settlement of these claims that would require further deliberation from the Court, Plaintiffs do not anticipate any further disputes as to the substance of the new rules. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant their motion for a stay of any further proceedings relating to Counts II, III and IV of the Amended Complaint, including staying the Summary Judgment Motion deadline as to these Counts. Dated: December 10, 2009 Respectfully submitted by: /s/ Bradley E. Heard Penda D. Hair Elizabeth S. Westfall Bradley E. Heard ADVANCEMENT PROJECT 1220 L Street, NW, Suite 850 Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel: 202-728-9557 Fax: 202-728-9558 phair@advancementproject.org ewestfall@advancementproject.org bheard@advancementproject.org James E. Johnson S. Gale Dick Elaina Loizou Stuart Naifeh DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP 919 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel: 212-909-6000 Fax: 212-909-6836 jejohnsn@debevoise.com sgdick@debevoise.com Richard Rosenblatt, Esq. 4
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 7 RICHARD ROSENBLATT & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. 8085 East Prentice Avenue Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Tel: 303-721-7399 x11 Fax: 720-528-1220 rrosenblatt@cwa-union.org Wendy Weiser Myrna Pérez BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW 161 Avenue of the Americas 12th Floor New York, New York 10013 Tel: 212-998-6284 Fax: 212-995-4550 wendy.weiser@nyu.edu myrna.perez@nyu.edu Karen Neuman Sarah Brannon FAIR ELECTIONS LEGAL NETWORK 1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW Suite 712 Washington, D.C. 20036 kneuman@fairelectionsnetwork.com sbrannon@fairelectionsnetwork.com Stephen P. Berzon James Finberg Stacey M. Leyton Barbara J. Chisholm ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 94108 Tel: 415-421-7151 Fax: 415-362-8064 sberzon@altshulerberzon.com jfinberg@altshulerberzon.com sleyton@altshulerberzon.com bchisholm@altshulerberzon.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Common Cause of Colorado, Mi Familia Vota Education 5
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 7 Fund and Service Employees International Union 6
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 10, 2009, I electronically filed the within and foregoing paper with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of record. /s/ Bradley E. Heard Bradley E. Heard Advancement Project 1220 L Street, NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: (202) 728-9557 Ext. 310 bheard@advancementproject.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-2 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2 Maurie G. Knaizer Monica Marquez Melody Mirbaba Office of the Colorado Attorney General State Services Building 1525 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 VIA E-mail Dear Counsel: December 9, 2009 Re: Common Cause of Colorado v. Beuscher (Civil No. 08-CV-2321-JLK) We are writing to follow-up on the Notice of Adoption and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that the Defendant issued yesterday, December 8, 2009. The Notice of Adoption includes modifications and additions to existing Election Rules relevant to the claims in this litigation at Rules 2.19, 2.21, 2.22 and 2.23. With the modifications and additions adopted as final rules under yesterday s notice, we believe that we are now in a position to settle Counts II and Counts III of the Amended Complaint. Additionally, Defendant also issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that proposes modifications and additions to Election Rules 2.18 and 2.20. If the proposal as currently drafted is adopted in substantial form, we would also be in a position to settle Count IV of the Amended Complaint. We would ask that the Defendant agree to seek a stay from the Court as to Counts II, III and IV of the Amended Complaint so that the parties can draft and execute a settlement agreement. If the Defendant is unwilling to agree, we plan to file a unilateral motion to that effect. We would like this settlement agreement to be executed and approved by the Court as soon as possible. Sincerely, -s- Sarah Brannon
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-2 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 15 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 16 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 17 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 18 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 19 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 20 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 21 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 22 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 23 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 24 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 25 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 26 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 27 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 28 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 29 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 30 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-3 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 31 of 31
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-4 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-4 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 7
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-4 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 7
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-4 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 7
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-4 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 7
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-4 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 7
Case 1:08-cv-02321-JLK Document 114-4 Filed 12/10/2009 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 7