STATEMENT. Evaluation of the fair value of the investment properties owned by Sponda PLC Moscow, Russia. Sponda Public Limited Company

Similar documents
RESEARCH INVESTMENT MARKET

RESEARCH INVESTMENT MARKET

Office market report Moscow

RESEARCH INVESTMENT MARKET Q3 2015

STATEMENT. Evaluation of the fair value of Sponda Plc s investment properties on 31 December 2009

European Real Estate Market H

STATEMENT. Evaluation of the fair value of Sponda Plc s investment properties on 31 December 2014

CEE RESEARCH RETAIL REPORT 2017

STATEMENT. Evaluation of the fair value of Sponda Oyj s investment properties on 30 September 2009

warehouse real estate market

The vacancy rate for Class A space on the Moscow office real estate market has reached its record level of 25.7%.

STATEMENT. Evaluation of the fair value of Sponda Plc s investment properties on 31 December 2015

A delicate equilibrium: IHS Jane's annual defence spending review

Valuation Advisory. Citycon Oyj. Market Valuation of the Investment Properties 30 June 2016

European Investment Bulletin

MIRLA D DEVELOPME T CORPORATIO PLC ( MirLand / Company ) U AUDITED I TERIM CO SOLIDATED REPORT FOR THE THREE MO THS E DED 31 MARCH 2011

Among CIS oil exporters, only Kazakhstan will evade the risk of slowing down economy

STATEMENT. Evaluation of the fair value of Sponda Plc s investment properties on 30 June 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. OIL & GAS 3. REAL ESTATE & CONSTRUCTION 4. WHOLESALE & RETAIL 5. OUTLOOK 1. INTRODUCTION

2 Macroeconomic Scenario

MACROECONOMIC FORECAST

OFFICE MARKET REPORT Moscow Q RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS

MIRLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PLC ( MirLand / Company ) UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2010

Raven Russia Ltd Raven Russia Ltd. RAVEN RUSSIA. Results for the 12 months ending 31 December 2013

Economic Projections For 2014 And 2015

MOSCOW OFFICE MARKET Year-End Review 2016

STATEMENT. Evaluation of the fair value of Sponda Oyj s investment properties on 31 March 2009

Swiss Quarterly: On the right track

THE ECONOMY AND THE BANKING SECTOR IN BULGARIA

Q FINANCIAL RESULTS PRESENTATION Oslo, 12 May 2010

Moscow and the Moscow Region

Heading 01 starts here: Heading 02 starts here (if any): Body text starts here: Heading 03 NO Internal Margins White skyline graphic on COVER PAGE:

RAVEN PROPERTY GROUP LIMITED

Valuation Advisory. Citycon Oyj. Market Valuation of the Investment Properties 30 September 2016

Good revenue growth continued; Q3 operating profit somewhat down on Q3 2010

Box V.4 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY INDICES: A NEW INITIATIVE FROM THE BANK OF GREECE

MIRLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PLC ( MirLand / Company ) UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2012

STATEMENT. Evaluation of the fair value of Sponda Plc s investment properties on 31 December 2012

DYNAMICS OF BUDGETARY REVENUE IN THE CONDITIONS OF ROMANIAN INTEGRATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION - A CONSEQUENTLY OF THE TAX AND HARMONIZATION POLICY

Financial Results Year February 2013

О КЛЮЧЕВОЙ СТАВКЕ RUSSIAN ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND CHALLENGES TO MONETARY POLICY. December Bank of Russia Presentation for Investors

Company Presentation for J.P. Morgan Credit and Equities Emerging Markets Conference 2017, London. October 2017

Open Joint Stock Company Company M.video. Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Information (Unaudited) Half-Year Ended 30 June 2013

Financial Results Q Kari Inkinen, President and CEO Erik Hjelt, CFO Pia Arrhenius, SVP, IR

4. Balance of Payments and Foreign Trade

ASSOCIATION'S REPORT 1st half of according to IFRS

December 2017 ECONOMIC FORECASTS FOR SPAIN 2018

STATEMENT. Evaluation of the fair value of Sponda Plc s investment properties on 31 December 2016

Threats and opportunities in Dutch Office Investment Market

Polish Real Estate Market Recovery after Financial Crisis

88 INVESTMENT MARKET

RUSSIAN ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND MONETARY POLICY. RUSSIA S ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND MONETARY POLICY December 2018

BROLL RETAIL BAROMETER

RAVEN RUSSIA LIMITED. Raven Russia Limited Risk Report. Extracted from the 2015 Annual Report

abcdefg Introductory remarks by Jean-Pierre Roth News Conference

European Market Outlook The Risks & the Opportunities Guy-young LAMÉ Associate Director Research Europe, Invesco Real Estate

Research notes Basic Information on Recent Elderly Employment Trends in Japan

STATEMENT. Evaluation of the fair value of Sponda Plc s investment properties on 30 June 2014

Anti-crisis State Policy in Russia

International Valuation Standards Council (IVSC) Exposure Draft. Illustrative Examples: Chapter 1 - Bases of Value

Oleg Ustenko, Julia Segura, Valentyn Povroznyuk Edilberto L. Segura

Autumn 2017 OUR VIEW ON OFFICES AND LABS

Outlook for Australian Property Markets Brisbane

Alexander Shirov. The long-term forecast of development of the Russian economy

MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Highest investment volume in a decade

2011 first-half earnings

Financial Year February 2009 Kari Inkinen, President and CEO Robert Öhman, CFO

Global credit crunch: myth or reality? Influence on the Russian banking system and economy

Green shoots appearing

Kazakhstan: on the wave of structural reforms. Aset Irgaliyev, PhD First Deputy Chairman Economic Research Institute

PROPERTY INSIGHTS. Market Overview. Central s rental drop slows. Hong Kong Quarter 2, 2012

Interim Report January March Kari Kauniskangas, President and CEO

O KEY GROUP ANNOUNCES AUDITED FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR FY2016

Management and Governance

Section Property Entities * Scope of section. Definitions

The Russian Pension System: What s Next? Bonds & Loans Conference Moscow, March 2017

GAIDAR INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RUSSIAN ECONOMY IN 2015 TRENDS AND OUTLOOKS (ISSUE 37)

RAVEN RUSSIA LIMITED

Investor Presentation Q Results. 25 May 2017

Research and Production Corporation United Wagon Company. 1H 2016 Financial Results

Ukraine Macroeconomic Situation

The conference covered the following themes, which will be summarised in this briefing:

Mauritius Economy Update January 2015

KEY CHALLENGES FOR SUSTAINING GROWTH AND COMPETITIVENESS IN SEE

Bank of Greece 2 nd conference on real estate market. Property valuations during crisis: consequences and risks

Real Estate Investors PLC ("REI" or the Company" or the Group") Half Year Results for the six months to 30 June 2014

Opportunities remain even though yields continue to fall

FINANCIAL STABILITY IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS

RUSSIAN ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND MONETARY POLICY. RUSSIA S ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND MONETARY POLICY February 2019

EMF Q32013 QUARTERLY STATISTICS. Another significant quarterly growth in gross residential lending

Revision of macroeconomic forecasts - November Dimitar Bogov Governor

Public Joint Stock Company Long-Distance and International Telecommunications Rostelecom and its subsidiaries

MARKETBEAT LUXEMBOURG RETAIL H A la croisée des chemins

Economic Projections for

O KEY GROUP ANNOUNCES AUDITED FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR 2018

Survey of. macroeconomic forecasts. Ministry of Finance Economic Policy Department

Belarus Economy as part of Common Economic space: analysis and forecast

Minutes of the Monetary Policy Council decision-making meeting held on 2 September 2015

European Valuation Monitor (EVM) MarketView Q2 2013

Transcription:

STATEMENT Evaluation of the fair value of the investment properties owned by Sponda PLC Moscow, Russia Sponda Public Limited Company Date of Valuation: December 31, 2018

STATEMENT 1 EVALUATION OF THE FAIR VALUE OF THE INVESTMENT PROPERTIES Our Assignment In accordance with the engagement contract #18/12-129CV dated December 5, 2018 between Sponda Plc (hereinafter referred to as the Client, the Company or Sponda ) and CB Richard Ellis LLC, we have estimated the Fair Value of the real estate properties. The Fair Value of the Sponda real estate Portfolio was estimated in accordance with RICS Valuation Professional Standards 2017 (the Standards ). Our calculations were conducted for accounting purposes. It may not be reproduced or used for any purpose other than the purpose stated above without the prior written consent of CB Richard Ellis LLC in each specific instance. The Portfolio covered in our analysis consists of 2 (two) operational properties held for investment purposes; the assets are described in Appendix 1 of this Statement. Our calculations covered the properties which we believe are owned by the Client or its subsidiaries. CBRE made relevant enquiries in order to provide our opinion of the Fair Value of the Property Portfolio as at December 31, 2018. We confirm that we provide this advice as external valuers and we are not aware of any conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest arising in carrying out this instruction. Approach In accordance with the Standards, our valuations have been prepared on the basis of Fair Value. There are two definitions of Fair Value defined in the Standards: The estimated price for the transfer of an asset or liability between identified knowledgeable and willing parties that reflects the respective interests of those parties (definition adopted by the International Valuation Standards Council - IVSC); The price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (definition adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board - IASB). According to Point 2 of the Comments in VS 3.5, In applying the IVS definition, reference should be made to paragraphs 39-43 of the IVS Framework. According to paragraph 40 of the IVS Framework, The International Valuation Standards Board (IVSB) considers that the definitions of fair value in IFRS are generally consistent with market value. In order to calculate the Fair Value of the Western Realty (Ducat Place II) we used the Income Approach, adopting a 5-year discounted cash flow method to arrive at a Net Present Value. We have based our valuation on the commercial terms provided to us by the Client in the tenancy schedule. In order to arrive at our conclusions regarding estimated rental values (ERV), we took into account opinion of CBRE s leasing agents, who have deep knowledge of Moscow office market, contracted rental rates within the Property as well as rental rates in comparable projects.

STATEMENT 2 Taking into account the size and the format of the Meliora Place office centre we relied on the results of Sale Comparison Approach to estimate the Fair Value of this Property. We have used gross floor areas as shown in the title documents. This valuation was based on the assumption that the Properties have clear title and are free from any actual or pending encumbrances, disputes, claims etc. We have relied upon the rentable areas, tenancy schedules, current rental rates and operating expenses as provided to us by the Client. We have not made check measurements to verify any areas and have assumed that all areas provided for the Properties and site areas are complete and correct. The Properties were inspected in the period between May 20, 2015 and October 26, 2018. We have been confirmed by the Client that no significant changes that could affect the value of the Properties have occurred in the period between the inspection and valuation dates. We have not undertaken structural surveys or tested any of the services. At the time of our inspection, the Properties generally appeared to be in a reasonable state of repair and decoration commensurate with age and use. We have not been provided with a copy of any building surveys or structural reports and have assumed that there are no defects that could have an impact on value. For the avoidance of doubt, we have not undertaken any environmental audits or other environmental investigations or soil surveys at the Properties that may draw attention to the existence of any contamination or the possibility of any such contamination. We have not carried out any investigation into past or present uses of the Properties nor of any neighbouring land to establish whether there is any potential for contamination from these uses or sites adjacent to the Properties, and have therefore assumed that none exists. CB Richard Ellis LLC will not assume any responsibility or liability for losses occurred to Sponda Plc, or other parties, as a result of the circulation, publication, reproduction or use of this Statement contrary to the provisions stated. We wish to emphasise that our liability rests with Sponda Plc and that we are under no obligation, contractual or otherwise, to any other parties. Market Conditions We would draw your attention to the fact that the current volatility and uncertainty in the Russian economy and financial market has created a significant degree of turbulence in commercial real estate market. Without stable market conditions, limited liquidity in the market and transaction evidence, it is very difficult to quantify with any degree of certainty the fair value of real estate assets. Whilst we believe our valuation is a reasonable assessment of the value of the individual assets it may also be difficult to achieve a sale of some assets in the short-term. We would therefore recommend that the situation and the valuations are kept under regular review, and that specific marketing advice is obtained should you wish to effect a disposal.

STATEMENT 3 MARKET COMMENTARY Macroeconomic Analysis of Russia, Q3 2018 According to the updated forecast of the Ministry of Economic Development GDP growth is expected to slow down to 1.9% in 2018 and 1.4% in 2019 (previously 2.1% and 2.2% were expected in 2018 and 2019 accordingly). Graph 1. GDP growth dynamics Source: Federal Statistics Service of Russia, CBRE The threat of a tighter US sanctions package continues to exert downward pressure on Russian assets, the RUB in particular, and on broader business and consumer confidence. The resulting rise in inflation and the hugely unpopular decision to raise the retirement age are hurting consumer confidence. Increased government spending on investment should offset part of this pressure from 2019 onwards. Russian rouble had a period of weakening since the beginning of August. In the face of accelerating inflationary pressures and no sign that the downward pressure on the rouble was subsiding and on the back of increased volatility, the Central Bank decided to raise the key rate to 7.5% (0,25 p.p. higher) at its September meeting. VAT will increase from 18% to 20% since January 1, 2019 and will drive up prices and inflation in 2019.

STATEMENT 4 Graph 2. Inflation and key rate dynamics Source: Federal Statistics Service of Russia Brent oil price after a slight decline from mid-august continued to increase and reached $82,86 per barrel by the end of Q3 2018. The last time such high values were observed in November 2014. Graph 3. Russian Rouble exchange rate and Brent oil price dynamics Source: Federal Statistics Service of Russia, Central Bank of Russia Despite expected economy damping, Russian economy is still recovering owing to oil price hardening, stably-low inflation level, retail sales and manufacturing volume growth.

STATEMENT 5 Moscow Office Market Overview Q3 2018 Supply In Q1-Q3 2018 office stock increased by about 102,000 sq m, more than half of which 55,000 sq m were commissioned in Q3 2018. Graph 4. Dynamics of completions, net absorption and vacancy rate In Q3 2018, part of VTB Arena office complex and Novion BC were commissioned. Completions volume will not exceed 200,000 sq m in 2018. It will be the lowest volume of new delivery since 2000. In the next few years new supply will remain sufficiently low compared to the pre-crisis years. In 2019, completions volume is expected to increase to 350,000 sq m. And 450,000 sq m are planned for commissioning in 2020. However, in Moscow almost every professional developer has a project in his portfolio, the construction of which can begin as soon as relevant client appears about one million sq m of build-to-suit projects. In Q3 2018, overall vacancy rate continued to decline and reached 10.9% (2.8 p.p. lower than at the end of 2017 and 0.6 p.p. lower compared to Q2 2018). By the end of 2018 and also in 2019 we expect the further decrease of vacancy rate. Class A vacancy rate is decreasing in a slightly faster pace. Thus, for the last three years this indicator decreased by almost 7 p.p. from 23.1% in Q1 2016 to 13.4% now. For the same period in Class B segment vacancy rate decreased by 5.5 p.p. to 9.9% at the end of Q3 2018.

STATEMENT 6 Graph 5. Vacancy rate by class According to our forecasts, by the end of the year Class A vacancy rate will slightly decrease and amount to 12.5%, while Class B vacancy rate will increase to 10.4% due completions planned to be commissioned in Q4 2018. Graph 6. Vacancy rate by location Demand In Q1-Q3 2018, take-up accounted for 996,000 sq m of office space, which is 33% higher compared to the value in Q1-Q3 2017. Moreover, this is the record volume of new transactions since 2011. The larger volume was in 2010, when 1,188,000 sq m office space was leased and purchased by end-users for the first three quarters by 19% higher than the current figure.

STATEMENT 7 Graph 7. Demand structure Net absorption amounted to 574,000 sq m in Q1-Q3 2018. This value is 2 times higher than the volume in the same period of 2017 and indicated a stable additional demand for office space. For the three quarters of 2018 the share of renewal and renegotiation transactions amounted to 18% of the total transactions volume (225,000 sq m). This value lower than the share in the first 9 months of 2016 and 2017, when such transactions accounted for about a quarter of the volume of all transactions. In Q1-Q3 2018, about 90% of take-up volume was formed by lease transactions which is similar to the Q1-Q3 2017 demand structure, when lease transactions amounted to 92% of take-up. Graph 8. Take-up structure by location In Q1-Q3 2018, approximately one third of leased and purchased space was Class A office premises (332,000 sq m), which is 3 p.p. lower than in the same period of 2017. Most of the space 37% in this segment was leased and purchased in the Central business district.

STATEMENT 8 Class B take-up accounted for 67% or 664,000 sq m of office space. The main demand in this segment occurred in the zone between TTR and MKAD 51% of new transaction volume in this segment (5 p.p. higher than in Q1-Q3 2017). Medium-sized offices with area of 1,001 3,000 sq m were in most demand in January- September 2018. However, their share in take-up structure decreased from 41% in the first 9 months of 2017 to 30% in the same period of this year. 18% of take-up volume was formed by large transactions (above 5,000 sq m). The number of such deals increased to 19 (in January-September 2017 9), the average size of a large transaction increased to 9,700 sq m against 8,200 sq m in 2017. Graph 9. Demand structure Financial companies formed the main demand for office premises. In Q1-Q3 2018, interest to office real estate increased noticeably from representatives of Leisure, Entertainment & Retail sector. Graph 10. Key sectors in take-up structure Russian companies were more active in the office market: 77% of take-up (3 p.p. higher compared to the same period in 2017). Financial sector companies continued to form the main demand for office premises (the largest deal in Q3 2018 was purchase of the

STATEMENT 9 building at 6 Lesnaya street by Avangard Bank). Their share in take-up structure increased from 15% in January-September 2017 to 17% in the same period of this year. In Q1-Q3 2018, interest to office real estate increased noticeably also from companies of Leisure, Entertainment & Retail sector (by 5 p.p. to 13%). Graph 11. Q3 2018 large deals Commercial terms In Q3 2018, the average level of rental rates remained in the ranges of the end of last year. The average asking rate for Class A Prime offices amounted to $750-850 per sq m per year excluding operating expenses and VAT, rental rates for Class A premises ranged at 18,000-30,000 RUB/sq m/year and for Class B offices 12,000-21,000 RUB/sq m/year. According to our forecasts, rental rates will start to increase gradually under the influence of a shrinking vacant supply and stable demand. In the next 12 months, average rental rate growth in Class A segment may amount to 5-10%, in Class B segment 2-3%.

STATEMENT 10 Real Estate Investment Market Overview Q3 2018 In Q3 2018, the volume of market transactions for the acquisition of real estate reached almost $800 mln, which, however, is 11% less compared to the same period of 2017. Among the largest deals RDIF together with a number of asian and middle eastern investors purchased the share in Rostec City project at the site of the former Tushino airfield. Total volume of transactions amounted to $2.1 bln for the first 9 months of 2018, while for the same period last year the figure was $2.6 billion. Also in Q3 O1 Properties changed the owner (Riverstretch Trading & Investments Ltd). Estimated value of this deal could be about $2.6-2.8 bln, but according to the calculation methodology it was not considered in the total volume of transactions. Overseas capital amounted to about $640 mln among the transactions that were executed in January-September 2018. The share of Western capital in the volume of overseas investments accounted for about 60%. Companies from France (Leroy Merlin), America (Hines), Czech Republic (PPF), Great Britain (Raven Russia) and some other countries executed deals. The share of investments from Asian companies and Middle East investors accounted for about 40%. Graph 12. Real estate investment volume dynamics, Q3 2018 In Q1-Q3 2018 the most tangible growth in investment occurred in the residential segment. In January-September of this year, developers invested about $660 mln in residential development sites, which is 26% higher than in the same period of 2017. At the same time, the share of this segment in the structure of investments increased by 11 p.p. from 20% in the first 9 months of 2017 to 31% in the same period of this year. This is explained by the desire of developers to acquire and negotiate the project before introducing amendments into the law. In Q1-Q3 2018, the volume of investments in the office segment decreased 1.6 times compared to the value for Q1-Q3 2017 and amounted to $440 mln or 21%.

STATEMENT 11 The largest transaction during this period was the acquisition of one of the office buildings of Metropolis complex in Q2 2018. The share of investments in retail real estate remained at the same level and accounted for also 21% in January-September 2018, the same as in Q1-Q3 2017. However, the volume of investments in this segment decreased by 16% to $460 million. In Q1-Q3 2018 the share of Investments in MFC accounted for 13%, in industrial real estate 10% and in hotels 4% of total investment volume. Graph 13. Investment volume breakdown by the sector, Q3 2018 Moscow attracted the largest share of investments in the first 9 months of 2018 64%. At the same time, high activity remains on the St. Petersburg market, whose share amounted to 28% against 24% in the same period last year. Graph 14. Investment volume breakdown by the region, Q3 2018

14 12 10 8 6 4 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q3 2018 STATEMENT 12 Capitalization rates for prime properties in Moscow has stopped compression and in Q3 2018 rates are: Office 9.00-9.50% Retail 9.00-9.75% Industrial 11.25-11.75% The risk premium for investing in high-quality second tier properties adds around 150-200 basis points, and in regional properties 200-400 basis points. In Q3 2018 yields for prime commercial real estate assets have been strengthening since 2017. Graph 15. Prime yields dynamics in Moscow 11.25-11.75% 9.00-9.75% 9.00-9.50% 2018 Office Retail Industrial, Q3 2018 Based on the results of the first three quarters and information on transactions in advanced stages of negotiation, the previously announced 2018 investment volume forecast in the amount of $5 bln was adjusted to $4 bln.

STATEMENT 13 Conclusions Upon the assumption that there are no onerous restrictions or unusual outgoings of which we have no knowledge, and subject to the comments made in our Valuation Report, we are of the opinion that the Fair Value of the Properties as at December 31, 2018 in round figures is as provided in the table below. Yours faithfully Yours faithfully Svetlana Shorina MRICS Director For and on behalf of CB Richard Ellis LLC Natalia Galakhova MRICS Associate Director For and on behalf of CB Richard Ellis LLC E: Svetlana.Shorina@cbre.com E: Natalia.Galakhova@cbre.com CBRE Valuation T: +7 495 258 3990 F: +7 495 258 3980 W: www.cbre.ru Project Reference: 18/12-129CV