CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Similar documents
CRS Report for Congress

Reducing the Budget Deficit: Policy Issues

AN ANALYSIS OF THE RECENT DETERIORATION IN THE FISCAL CONDITION OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT

Report for Congress. The Budget for Fiscal Year Updated April 10, 2003

The Budget Control Act of 2011: Effects on Spending Levels and the Budget Deficit

The Federal Budget: Sources of the Movement from Surplus to Deficit

WikiLeaks Document Release

working paper President Obama s First Budget By Veronique de Rugy No March 2009

Mandatory Spending Since 1962

The Budget Control Act of 2011: Effects on Spending Levels and the Budget Deficit

Mandatory Spending Since 1962

What The New CBO Report Shows Budget And Economic Outlook Has Not Improved by James Horney and Richard Kogan

Ebbs and Flows of Federal Debt

U.S. National Security Budgets in Context. Cindy Williams Principal Research Scientist

kaiser The President s FY 2005 Budget Proposal: medicaid and the uninsured Overview and Briefing Charts June 2004 commission on

Overview of the Federal Budget

Grandfathered Health Plans Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)

The Budget Control Act of 2011: The Effects on Spending and the Budget Deficit

Bush Still on Track to Borrow $10 Trillion by 2014 According to Latest Official Estimates

SMALLER DEFICIT ESTIMATE NO SURPRISE New OMB Estimates Do Not Support Claims About Tax Cuts By James Horney

Understanding the Federal Budget 1

CONGRESS HAS CUT DISCRETIONARY FUNDING BY $1.5 TRILLION OVER TEN YEARS First Stage of Deficit Reduction Is In Law

Overview of the Federal Tax System in 2018

Financing the U.S. Trade Deficit

Mandatory Spending Since 1962

CHARTS MAY 10, 2018 WASHINGTON, D.C.

Generational Outlook: The Federal Budget Now and in the Future THE CONCORD COALITION

Selected Charts on the Long-Term Fiscal Challenges of the United States

THE PRESIDENT S BUDGET REQUEST FOR FY 2013

Chapter Eight: Government Budgeting

CHARTS MAY 23, 2017 WASHINGTON, D.C.

The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond

CBO s Official Baseline Projections Substantially Understate the Deficits That Will Occur if Current Policies Are Extended

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022

Notes Numbers in the text and tables may not add up to totals because of rounding. Unless otherwise indicated, years referred to in describing the bud

GAO. The Federal Government s Long-Term Fiscal Outlook. January 2010 Update. United States Government Accountability Office

Senate Proposal for Balanced Budget Amendment Would Require Extreme Budget Cuts By Richard Kogan and Cecile Murray 1

How Much Defense Can We Afford?

The Recession: Similarities to and Differences from the Past

The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2018 and Beyond

Slide Set 17: The Debt and the Deficit

Statement of Chris Edwards, Director of Fiscal Policy, Cato Institute. before the Senate Democratic Policy Committee

HOW DOES THE PROPOSED LEVEL OF FOREIGN ECONOMIC AID UNDER THE BUSH BUDGET COMPARE WITH HISTORICAL LEVELS?

WebMemo22. New CBO Budget Baseline Shows that Soaring Spending Not Falling Revenues Risks Drowning America in Debt

PROGRAM CUTS UNDER A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT: HOW SEVERE MIGHT THEY BE? By Richard Kogan

AUGUST 2012 An Update to the Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022 Provided as a convenience, this screen-friendly version is identic

AS A SHARE OF THE ECONOMY AND THE BUDGET, U.S. DEVELOPMENT AND HUMANITARIAN AID WOULD DROP TO POST-WWII LOWS IN 2002.

CHARTS MAY 7, 2013 WASHINGTON, D.C.

THE FACTS ABOUT FEDERAL SPENDING A

MID-SESSION REVIEW BUDGET OF THE U. S. GOVERNMENT

The President s Budget Request FY 2013

The Budget Control Act of 2011: Legislative Changes to the Law and Their Budgetary Effects

DIALOGUE WITH THE FED: ACHIEVING LONG-RUN FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY

The Federal Government Debt: Its Size and Economic Significance

National Government Spending, Revenues, and Resulting Surpluses or Deficits , in Billions of Constant (2002) Dollars

Trends in Discretionary Spending

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Deficits and Debt: Economic Effects and Other Issues

Chapter 10. Fiscal Policy. Macroeconomics: Principles, Applications, and Tools NINTH EDITION

POSTSCRIPT: FROM DEFICIT POLITICS TO THE POLITICS OF SURPLUS

Does the Budget Surplus Justify Large-Scale Tax Cuts?: Updates and Extensions

The Economics of the Federal Budget Deficit

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2016 to 2026 Percentage of GDP 100 Actual Projected 80

ECONOMIC POLICY AND THE CHALLENGE OF DEMOCRACY

The Federal Budget: Issues for FY2014 and Beyond

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per re

FISCAL YEAR 2017 HISTORICAL TABLES BUDGET OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET BUDGET.GOV. Scan here to go to our website.

CRS-2 issuance of United States Defense of Freedom Bonds to aid in funding the war against terrorism... S would authorize the issuance of United

Current Economic Conditions and Selected Forecasts

FACT SHEET CBO BUDGET OUTLOOK FY

The Economics of the Federal Budget Deficit

Introduction The federal government runs a deficit when spending (mandatory, discretionary, and interest payments on the debt) is greater than revenue

The FY 2011 Federal R&D Investment

1800 K Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC Phone: Fax: Web:

In fiscal year 2016, for the first time since 2009, the

WHAT OMB S MID-SESSION REVIEW TELLS US AND WHAT IT OBSCURES. by Richard Kogan and Robert Greenstein

JOINT STATEMENT OF JACOB J.C.

Federal Spending to Top a Record $4 Trillion in FY2017

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS REGIONAL STRATEGIES. PARTNERSHIPS. SOLUTIONS

An Overview of the Clinton Budget Plan

Understanding the Federal Budget Process

Economic Policy. Jacob Dean, Alan Avilez

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2013 to 2023

CBPP S UPDATED LONG-TERM FISCAL DEFICIT AND DEBT PROJECTIONS

Deficits and Debt: Economic Effects and Other Issues

Chapter 10 GOVERNMENT SPENDING

center for retirement research

The President's Fiscal Year 1994 Budget. $60 billio n. $91 billio n. $296 billion. Total Deficit Reduction FY'94-FY'98 $447 billion

Congressional Budget Office FY 2011 Outlay Projection: $3.899 Trillion

Facing the Music: The Fiscal Outlook at the End of the Bush Administration

THE CHANGING BUDGET OUTLOOK: CAUSES AND IMPLICATIONS

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS 1

Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

Understanding the National Debt and the Debt Ceiling

CRS Report for Congress

Tools of Budget Analysis (Chapter 4 in Gruber s textbook) 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley

Pressures on DoD s Budget Over the Next Decade

(Outlays, by fiscal year, in millions of dollars) 5-Year Estimate Date Total

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Transcription:

Order Code RS22128 April 27, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Discretionary Spending: Prospects and History Philip D. Winters Analyst in Government Finance Government and Finance Division Federal spending has changed, both in size and composition over the last 40 years. Total federal spending is now a larger percentage of the economy (as measured by gross domestic product GDP) than it was in 1965 (19.8% of GDP vs 17.2% of GDP). Mandatory spending (generally spending that result from laws other than appropriations acts, such as Social Security and Medicare), has grown substantially, both as a percentage of GDP and as a percentage of total spending to become, today, the largest component of federal spending. Mandatory spending, without significant changes to the programs composing it, will continue growing as a percentage of GDP and as a percentage of total outlays into the future. Discretionary spending (generally outlays that result from the budget authority provided in appropriations acts, such as defense, education, and transportation), and in particular its defense spending component, has shrunk over the last 40 years. Defense spending in 1965 dominated the budget, making up 43.2% of total spending. Total discretionary spending was 65.8% of total outlays. In 1965, defense spending was 7.4% of GDP and total discretionary spending was 11.3% of GDP. By 2004, defense spending had fallen to 19.8% of total spending and 3.9% of GDP. Total discretionary spending had fallen to 39.1% of total spending and 7.8% of GDP. Under President Bush s FY2006 budget proposals (February 2005) discretionary spending will continue falling as shares of total spending and of GDP over the next five years (if not longer). This report will not be updated. The size and nature of federal spending has changed dramatically over the last 40 years. 1 In 1965, measured as percentages of gross domestic product (GDP), total outlays were 17.2% of GDP and discretionary spending was 11.3% of GDP (defense spending was 7.4% of GDP). Mandatory spending was 4.6% of GDP and net interest was 1.3% of GDP. Measured as shares of total outlays, discretionary spending was 65.8% of total spending and defense spending was two-thirds of that, 43.2% of total outlays. Mandatory 1 Unless otherwise noted, all years referred to in this report are fiscal years. Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress

Congressional Operations Briefing Capitol Hill Workshop Congressional Operations Briefing and Seminar The definitive overview of how Congress works. This intensive course is offered as a 3-day public Briefing and as a tailored on-site 3, 4 or 5-day program. Public Briefings are offered throughout the year in Washington, DC. Space is limited. Dates, Agenda, Previous Faculty, and Secure Online Registration: TCNCHW.com On-site Congressional Briefings and Capitol Hill Workshops for agencies: CLCHW.com 202-678-1600 TheCapitol.Net All of our courses and workshops include extensive interaction with our faculty, making our courses and workshops both educational as well as miniconsulting sessions with substantive experts. Non-partisan training and publications that show how Washington works. PO Box 25706, Alexandria, VA 22313-5706 202-678-1600 www.thecapitol.net TheCapitol.Net is on the GSA Schedule, 874-4, for custom on-site training. GSA Contract GS02F0192X Courses approved for CEUs from George Mason University Our Upcoming Schedule of Courses can be seen online on our web site or at TCNCourses.com. All of our courses and any combination of their topics can be customized for on-site training for your organization we are on GSA Advantage, Contract GS02F0192X. thecapitol.net 202-678-1600

CRS-2 spending there were fewer (no Medicare) and generally much smaller programs than today were 26.9% of total outlays. 2 Net interest was 7.3% of total outlays. By 2004, total discretionary spending had fallen to 7.8% (defense spending had fallen to 3.9%), mandatory spending had grown to almost 10.7% of GDP, and net interest was 1.4% of GDP, similar to its level in 1965. As shares of total outlays in 2004, discretionary spending was 39.1% (and of that, defense was 19.8%), mandatory spending had risen to 53.9%, and net interest was 7.0% of total outlays. Prospects for Discretionary Spending in the President s Budget. The President s fiscal year (FY) 2006 budget proposed limiting growth in discretionary spending, both defense and nondefense, during the five years covered by his budget, (through 2010). The proposal would hold discretionary spending growth (measured by net budget authority rather than outlays) to 2% in 2006 and 3% in 2007. If adopted, these proposals would, according to the budget, produce a shrinkage in total discretionary spending in real terms and as a share of GDP over these years. The President also proposed cutting non-defense, non-homeland security spending by 1% in 2006 and to hold it to no dollar growth in subsequent years. If these proposals were adopted, according to the Administration s projections, non-defense, non-homeland security discretionary spending would fall as a share of GDP, in inflation-adjusted terms, and in spending per capita over the next five years. The Congressional Budget Office s (CBO) reestimates of the President s proposals (March 2005) showed total discretionary spending (again in budget authority) not growing at all between 2005 and 2010. 3 Budget authority for nondefense discretionary spending would fall at an average annual rate of 0.8% in CBO s reestimates of the President s proposals from 2005 through 2010. CBO extended the President s proposals through 2015 by incorporating an inflation adjustment to discretionary spending after 2010 and continuing mandatory spending. CBO points out that the President s proposals do not include any funding (beyond proposed regular defense spending) for continuing activities in Iraq and Afghanistan after 2005. Continuing that funding at approximately current levels, according to one path estimated by CBO, would raise the deficit by approximately $70 billion in 2006. Assuming that the funding for these activities is still needed, but taper off over time, CBO estimated that $285 billion would be needed between 2006 and 2010 and that $418 billion would be needed for the 10-year period, 2006 through 2015. 4 If the funding were to occur, it would fall mostly within discretionary spending and most of that would likely be for defense spending. Therefore, the Administration s proposals for the years 2006 through 2010 have likely understated the level of discretionary spending that would probably be needed, if the government is to maintain the ongoing operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 2 Social Security produced somewhat over half the outlays of mandatory spending in 1965. 3 CBO. An Analysis of the President s Budgetary Proposals for Fiscal Year 2006, March 2005. 4 These amounts do not include another $172 billion in additional net interest payments over 10 years from the bigger federal debt resulting from larger deficits.

CRS-3 Federal Spending Since 1965. Figure 1 provides federal outlays by broad category of spending for the years 1965 through 2015. The data for 1965 through 2004 are actual amounts; the estimated and projected amounts through 2015 are from CBO s estimates of the President s policy proposals from his FY2006 budget. Mandatory % of GDP Figure 1. Federal Outlays by Type 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% (as percentages of GDP) Non-defense Net Interest Discretionary Mandatory Defense 0% 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 Source: CBO data; CRS Fiscal Year spending grew as a percentage of GDP throughout the period and is now, and likely to be in the future, the largest component of federal spending. Net interest has varied over the period, growing with rising interest rates or rapid increases in federal debt (resulting from large deficits) and declining with falling interest rates, budget surpluses (which reduce federal debt), or small deficits. If deficits remain large and federal debt grows faster than GDP, net interest can be expected to grow in the future. Discretionary spending has fallen over the period, and, under the President s proposals (as estimated by CBO) can be expected to continue falling as a share of GDP. Defense discretionary spending had a dramatic fall from 7.4% of GDP in 1965 to 4.3% of GDP in 2004. Non-defense discretionary spending experienced little change over the same period, moving from 3.9% of GDP in 1965 to 3.8% of GDP in 2004. Over the period, non-defense discretionary spending ranged between 3% and 5% of GDP. CBO s projections of the President s proposals show further reductions in discretionary spending for both defense and non-defense, as shares of GDP to levels not seen previously. Discretionary spending would fall from 7.8% of GDP in 2004 to 6.6% of GDP in 2015. If achieved, it would be a historic low for discretionary spending in the modern era (see Table 1 on page 6). Table 1 contains defense, nondefense, and total discretionary spending in billions of dollars, as a percentage of GDP, and as a percentage of total outlays for the years 1965 through 2015. The data do not include any future spending, after 2005, for ongoing operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Because the Administration s budget does not include these estimates, neither does CBO s estimates of the President s proposals. This produces the dollar reduction in defense spending for several years after 2005 (see Table 1). The changing value of the dollar over a 40-year period limits the usefulness of measuring spending changes in nominal dollars. Total discretionary spending grew from $78 billion in 1965 to $895 billion in 2004, but without some reference point, all the information tells us is that more dollars were spent in 2004 than in 1965. On the other hand, comparing spending over time as a share of the economy (as measured by its

CRS-4 percentage of GDP), provides a more useful comparison: how much of the nation s economic resources did this type of federal spending use in 1965 compared to 2004? Total discretionary spending fell from 11.3% of GDP in 1965 to 7.8% of GDP in 2004. The change reflects a 32% reduction federal discretionary programs use of the nation s economic resources. Under the President s proposals (as projected by CBO), discretionary spending will exceed $1 trillion by 2015, but will have fallen to 5.5% of GDP (a reduction of 29% in the nation s economic resources being used by federal discretionary programs), the lowest level for which data are available. 5 If defense spending is adjusted to include additional spending for Iraq and Afghanistan after 2005, total discretionary spending (CBO estimates) would be larger by $70 billion in 2006, $75 billion in 2007, and $30 billion in 2010. The additional spending raises defense spending by 14.8% in 2006 and by 16.4% in 2007. Total discretionary spending would increase by 7.4% in 2006 and by 8.1% in 2007. The higher spending, without any other changes, would raise defense and total discretionary spending by approximately 0.5% of GDP in 2006, 2007, and 2008, and by lesser amounts (approximately 0.2% of GDP) in subsequent years. Figure 2. Defense and Non-defense Outlays (as percentages of GDP) 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% Defense 4% 2% Non-defense 0% 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 Source: CBO data; CRS Fiscal Year % of GDP Separating discretionary spending into defense and nondefense spending provides information on which part, if either, has driven the changes in total discretionary spending. The data for discretionary spending and its two components, defense and nondefense spending are shown as percentages of GDP in Figure 2. As shares of GDP, defense spending has fallen from 7.4% in 1965 to 3.9% in 2004. CBO s projections of the President s policies has the defense share falling to 3.2% of GDP in 2015. Non-defense spending as a percentage of GDP has had much smaller changes over the period than defense spending. (This does not include any additional funding for Iraq or Afghanistan after 2005.) In 1965, non-defense spending was 3.9% of GDP and it was 3.8% of GDP in 2004. CBO s projections of the President s policy proposals would reduce its percentage to 2.6% of GDP in 2015. The shares of GDP 5 The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) does not provide this particular data prior to 1962.

CRS-5 in 2015 for both defense and non-defense (if fulfilled) would be their smallest shares during the entire period shown in Table 1 (on the next page). Defense spending, in the mid- to late 1960s, was a much larger component of the budget (46.2% of total outlays in 1968) and as a share of the economy (10.5% of GDP in 1968) than it has been since. In the late 1960s, the country was engaged in the Viet Nam War, pushing defense spending up as a share of GDP (and as a share of total outlays). The current war on terror (at least those parts of the war on terror falling within defense spending) has used a much smaller portion of the nation s economic resources (GDP) than were used in the 1960s or in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Defense spending fell as a share of GDP throughout the entire period except for the Reagan defense build-up in the 1980s and the increase in funding after the terror attacks in 2001. The non-defense spending category covers the largest number of federal activities, but uses the smallest amount of money. These activities range from those provided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to the National Park Service to the Environmental Protection Agency among many, many more. It s share of GDP varied within a relatively small range between 1965 and 2004, from a high of 5.2% of GDP (in 1978 and 1980) to a low of 3.2% of GDP (in 1999). 6 The constraints on non-defense spending proposed by the Administration would reduce its share of GDP, its share of total spending, its spending in constant (inflation adjusted) dollars, and its spending per capita. 6 In comparison over the 1965 to 2004 period, defense spending ranged from a high of 10.5% of GDP in 1968 to a low of 3.3% of GDP in the years 1999 through 2001. Mandatory spending over the same period ranged from a low of 4.6% of GDP in 1965 and 1966 to a high of 10.9% of GDP in 2003.

CRS-6 Table 1. Federal Discretionary Outlays (In dollars, percentage of GDP, and percentage of total outlays) Defense Non-defense Total Defense Non-defense Total Defense Non-defense Total $ in billions % of GDP % of total outlays 1965 $51 $27 $78 7.4% 3.9% 11.3% 43.1% 22.7% 65.8% 1966 59 31 90 7.8 4.2 11.9 43.9 23.1 67.0 1967 72 35 107 8.9 4.3 13.1 45.7 21.9 67.6 1968 82 36 118 9.5 4.2 13.6 46.2 20.1 66.3 1969 83 35 117 8.7 3.6 12.4 45.0 18.8 63.9 1970 82 38 120 8.1 3.8 11.9 41.9 19.6 61.5 1971 79 44 123 7.3 4.0 11.3 37.6 20.7 58.3 1972 79 49 129 6.7 4.2 10.9 34.4 21.3 55.7 1973 77 53 130 5.9 4.1 9.9 31.4 21.7 53.1 1974 81 58 138 5.6 4.0 9.6 30.0 21.3 51.3 1975 88 70 158 5.6 4.5 10.1 26.4 21.2 47.5 1976 90 86 176 5.2 4.9 10.1 24.2 23.1 47.2 1977 98 100 197 4.9 5.0 10.0 23.8 24.3 48.2 1978 105 114 219 4.7 5.2 9.9 22.8 24.9 47.7 1979 117 123 240 4.7 5.0 9.6 23.2 24.4 47.6 1980 135 142 276 4.9 5.2 10.1 22.8 24.0 46.8 1981 158 150 308 5.2 4.9 10.1 23.3 22.1 45.4 1982 186 140 326 5.8 4.3 10.1 24.9 18.8 43.7 1983 210 143 353 6.1 4.2 10.3 26.0 17.7 43.7 1984 228 151 379 5.9 3.9 9.9 26.8 17.8 44.5 1985 253 163 416 6.1 3.9 10.0 26.7 17.2 43.9 1986 274 165 439 6.2 3.7 10.0 27.6 16.6 44.3 1987 283 162 444 6.1 3.4 9.5 28.1 16.1 44.2 1988 291 174 464 5.8 3.4 9.3 27.3 16.3 43.6 1989 304 185 489 5.6 3.4 9.0 26.6 16.2 42.7 1990 300 200 501 5.2 3.5 8.7 23.9 16.0 39.9 1991 320 214 533 5.4 3.6 9.0 24.1 16.1 40.3 1992 303 231 534 4.8 3.7 8.6 21.9 16.7 38.6 1993 292 247 539 4.4 3.7 8.2 20.7 17.5 38.3 1994 282 259 541 4.1 3.7 7.8 19.3 17.7 37.0 1995 274 271 545 3.7 3.7 7.4 18.0 17.9 35.9 1996 266 267 533 3.5 3.4 6.9 17.0 17.1 34.1 1997 272 276 547 3.3 3.3 6.7 17.0 17.2 34.2 1998 270 282 552 3.1 3.3 6.4 16.3 17.1 33.4 1999 276 297 572 3.0 3.2 6.3 16.2 17.4 33.6 2000 295 320 615 3.0 3.3 6.3 16.5 17.9 34.4 2001 306 343 649 3.0 3.4 6.5 16.4 18.4 34.9 2002 349 385 734 3.4 3.8 7.1 17.3 19.2 36.5 2003 405 421 825 3.7 3.9 7.6 18.7 19.5 38.2 2004 454 441 895 3.9 3.8 7.8 19.8 19.3 39.1 2005 495 467 962 4.0 3.8 7.9 20.2 19.1 39.2 2006 472 474 947 3.7 3.7 7.3 18.6 18.6 37.3 2007 457 468 926 3.4 3.4 6.8 17.4 17.8 35.2 2008 468 463 931 3.3 3.2 6.5 17.1 16.9 34.0 2009 486 463 949 3.2 3.1 6.3 16.9 16.1 33.0 2010 503 465 968 3.2 3.0 6.1 16.8 15.5 32.3 2011 522 471 993 3.2 2.9 6.0 16.6 14.9 31.5 2012 526 480 1,006 3.1 2.8 5.8 16.1 14.7 30.8 2013 544 490 1,033 3.0 2.7 5.7 15.8 14.2 30.0 2014 558 500 1,057 3.0 2.7 5.6 15.5 13.8 29.3 2015 572 510 1,083 2.9 2.6 5.5 15.1 13.4 28.5 Sources: OMB, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2006, Historical Tables, February 2005. CBO, An Analysis of the President s Policy Proposals for Fiscal Year 2006, March 2005. CRS calculations.

GOVERNMENT SERIES The Federal Budget Process A Description of the Federal and Congressional Budget Processes, Including Timelines