Metro. Receive and File the analysis of the elimination of the monthly FasTrak account maintenance fee.

Similar documents
ExpressLanes/HOT Lanes (I-110) DEIR/EA Project Overview March

Review of 91 Toll Road Funding

Planning a Regional Express Lane Network Lessons from the Bay Area

SANDAG FasTrak Terms & Conditions. Este documento está disponible en español en 511sd.com/FasTrak.

J.P. Morgan Public Finance Transportation & Utility Investor Forum

Introduction Project Overview How Express Lanes Work 101 Managed Lane Financial Forecast Performance Comparison Ownership Considerations Transit

Get your E-ZPass today!

Listed below is a breakdown of specific project economic benefits:

One Gateway Plaza Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA ACTION: AUTHORIZATION FOR LIFE OF PROJECT BUDGET INCREASE

Tampa Bay Express Planning Level Traffic and Revenue (T&R) Study

FY METROLINK BUDGET AND LACMTA'S COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM

One Gateway Plaza Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA 900l THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATION

91 Express Lanes Toll Policy Adopted July 14, 2003

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Figure 1-1: SR 156 Study Area & Monterey Expressway Alignment

FY19 Budget - Discussion. April 2018

APPROVE INCREASE TO L1FE-OF-PROJECT BUDGET

RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy Adopted June 7, 2012

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type: Budget Agenda Number: 3.

FY17 Budget Discussion

Metro. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room. Los Angeles, CA. RECAP of Proceedings

Public Works Financing

HB408: E-ZPass Monthly Fee Removal

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FUNDS

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview: State Fiscal Year

RCTC 91 EXPRESS LANES FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Enterprise Fund of the Riverside County Transportation Commission)

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA)

An Examination of Houston s QuickRide Participants by Frequency of QuickRide Usage

Technical Memorandum Update - Evaluation of Tolling Effects on Low Income Populations

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Commuter Benefit Plan 2007

Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan

Legislative Issues (Task 8) with Regard to HOT Lanes in Houston

@ Metro OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MAY 19,201 1 SPACE PLANNINGIINSTALLATION SERVICES, AND WORKSTATIONS AWARD FIVE YEAR CONTRACT

FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY. Financial Statements. June 30, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

One Gateway Plaza Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA goo REQUIRES 213 VOTE PER Administrative Code , Part D

what is Reciprocity? what are the benefits of reciprocity?

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

Agenda Item No. 6d January 27, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, Interim City Manager

Employer-Based Commuter Benefits Programs: How they Work and their Impacts February 9, 2017

TRANSIT EXPENSE PLAN (TEP)

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY. Financial Statements. June 30, 2014 and (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

Parking Cash Out. Transportation Solutions Workshop Series April 19, 2017

Increased Transportation Infrastructure Investment Critical to State s Continued Economic Development

Appendix O. Transportation Financial Background

SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of Regional Leadership Forum March 15, 2018

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1049

Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act

SEPTEMBER 2018 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

FAQ s on Free-Flow Tolling on SEQ Roads

Transportation Authority of Marin: 2018 Transportation Revenue Measure Feasibility Survey

Page 2 of 5 Options Attachments None 1. Do not transition the programs to CCTA and provide direction back to TRANSPAC. Changes from Committee Backgrou

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza z.i Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooi~-zg5z rnetro.net

Summary Plan Description Employee Benefits Corporation /18 (Standard)

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

E-PASS Customer Agreement Approved by CFX Board July 13, 2017

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

Application Instructions (application begins inside)

Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix G Economic Analysis Report

A. Approve updated Measure R Early Action Project list (Attachment A) ; and

Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to establish a bench of financial advisors with each of the recommended firms in two categories as follows:

Transportation Committee Meeting

SB 1: Debunking the Myths

LACMTA Presentation Outline. > Agency Overview. > Key Projects / Initiatives. > Credit Profile, Current Debt & Debt Issuance Outlook

Memorandum. Agenda Item 2. TO: Conunission. DA TE: December 8, FR: Executive Director. RE: Regional Measure 3. Background

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Commercial Vehicle Program Information Guide

CONGRESS OKAYS CASH OUT

APPROVE CONTRACT AWARD FOR INSURANCE BROKERAGE SERVICES

TXDOT CONGESTION RELIEF INITIATIVE, INCLUDING

RECAP of Proceedings. Metro. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room.

Texas Department of Transportation 1

CHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL STRATEGIES: PAYING OUR WAY

TC RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TREASURE ISLAND MOBILITY MANAGEMENT

Chesapeake Transportation System July 10, 2012

Overview 1.1 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS. Table 1.1 Comparative Per Mile Toll Rates. Florida Department of Transportation ENTERPRISE TOLL OPERATIONS

TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ACTIVITY

PROPOSED FY19 BUDGET JULY 1, 2018 JUNE 30, For Board Consideration & Public Comment

Proposed Agreed-Upon Procedures Applied to the TransNet Fund Transit Operators For the Year Ended June 30, 2018

JUNE 2018 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

91 EXPRESS LANES 2008 ANNUAL REPORT : Express Lanes

Re: San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency s Fiscal Year 2015 budget

APPROVE REVISIONS TO TRANSIT PROJECT CONTINGENCY POLICY

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

Balancing Efficiency and Equity

REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010

Metro VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION. January 10, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) System

Northern Virginia District State of the District. Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer March 15, 2016

NRI COMMITTEE SESSION

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

What is the Regional Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) Program?

Frequently Asked Questions

GRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY

STUDY SCHEDULE STUDY PURPOSE

FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT March 1, 2018 Page 2 of 9 Below is a summary of the FY adopted budget and the proposed midy

Fitch Analytical Comparative Tool (FACT): U.S. Toll Roads

Rental Record#

ECONOMIC USE PATTERNS FOR ATLANTA S HOT LANES

Transcription:

, ~ Los Angeles County ~ Motropolibo T~ pmt.tio '""'""'' SUBJECT: ACTION: Metro RECOMMENDATION One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.2000 Tel metro. net AD HOC CONGESTION PRICING COMMITTEE JANUARY 16, 2013 SYSTEMS, SAFETY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE JANUARY 17, 2013 FASTRAK MONTHLY ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE FEE RECEIVE AND FILE Receive and File the analysis of the elimination of the monthly FasTrak account maintenance fee. ISSUE At its December 13, 2012 Board meeting, Director Yaroslavsky introduced a motion for the elimination of the $3 FasTrak monthly account maintenance fee. The motion will be considered by the full Board at its January 24, 2013 meeting. This report summarizes the advantages and disadvantages including the cost impact of the elimination of this fee. BACKGROUND 42 Since the $40 in pre-paid tolls serves as a customer deposit with the toll system operator, these funds are not available to Metro to offset expenses unless and until the customer pays a toll when traveling alone on the 11 0 Express lanes or pays administrative fees. Per State law, the customer can also use the Metro issued FasTrak transponder to pay a toll on toll facilities throughout the State. When this occurs, Metro deducts the toll from the customer's account and wires the funds to the respective toll facility. This function streamlines the toll payment process for the customer and provides a key benefit for the customer of only needing to establish a single account All motorists traveling on the 11 0 Express lanes are required to have a pre-paid FasTrak transponder. The amount to open a FasTrak account and receive a transponder is $40 with a credit/debit card. The transponder deposit is waived. Should customers choose to use the Expresslanes as a toll-paying customer the toll is deducted from the $40 pre-paid toll balance. Any remaining toll balance is refunded to the customer when their account is closed in good standing and they return the transponder in good working condition.

and transponder to use any FasTrak facility; customers are not required to maintain multiple accounts with various agencies. Comparison with other Toll Facilities in California Other agencies across the State have concluded that a significant percentage (30% on average) of customers will open FasTrak accounts and rarely/never use them on their toll facility while the agency incurs costs associated with maintaining the account without receiving the corresponding congestion relief benefit. As a result, four out of the five toll agencies across the State have implemented the monthly account maintenance fee to ensure every customer pays their fair share for the cost of maintaining the account, either by actually using the tolled facility or by paying the fee. Serving as a financial clearinghouse due to diversion has been a concern in the State as demonstrated by the fact that three of the toll facilities (TCA, SANDAG, and South Bay Expressway (now part of SANDAG)) initially opened their facilities without a monthly account maintenance fee. Within a few years of operating, all three facilities implemented the monthly account maintenance fee because of the need to manage rising operating costs incurred with inactive/infrequent account users. As an example, last year the Orange County facilities generated between $6 million and $9 million from the account maintenance fee, significantly offsetting the cost of inactive/infrequent users. As illustrated in Table 1 below, Metro's monthly account maintenance fee is similar to the other toll facilities in California in that it is based on usage and offers an incentive - four one-way trips (any combination of driving alone, carpool, vanpool, motorcycle, or transit) in a month on the Metro Expresslanes waives the fee. The fee is also automatically waived for LA County low income commuters enrolled in the Equity Plan. Table 1 Agency Has Fee How Are Fees Standard Fee Offers Monthly Fee is Policy? Assessed? Amount($) Incentive? Waived if: TCA Yes Per Account $2.00 permo Yes Tolls Exceed $25 permo OCTA Yes Per Account $7.00 permo Yes Toils Exceed $7 per mo SANDAG Yes Per Account $4.50 permo Yes Tolls Exceed $4.50 permo METRO Yes Per Account $3.00 permo Yes 4 one-way trips per mo (regardless of toll amount) BATA* No -- -- -- -- -- ~-- ------~------ ----- - ---------- --- - - - - ---- --~-~ *The Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA) does not charge a monthly account maintenance fee to its more than one million FasTrak accounts. BATA serves as the regional toll operator for all of the facilities in the Bay Area (7 toll bridges and 2 Express Lane facilities) which creates economies of scale. More than two million transponders are distributed in the Bay Area. Contrast this with 2

Southern California where there are 4 separate toll agencies with less than 2,000,000 transponders issued among them combined. Further, BATA receives a greater percentage of toll revenue from all of their account holders since they charge two-person carpools a toll on all seven bridges. Conversely, the majority of Metro ExpressLane users on the 110 are carpools and are not charged a toll and therefore Metro does not receive revenue from these accounts. Purpose of the Monthly Account Maintenance Fee There is a cost incurred by Metro associated with issuing a transponder for each vehicle and there is also a cost for maintaining the FasTrak account, as indicated in Table 2 below. Table 2 --------------------------- TOTAL $3.00 Operating a sustainable business model that generates net toll revenue for the ExpressLanes is among one of the key critical success factors of the program. The $3 monthly account maintenance fee was approved by the Board at its April 2010 meeting. The monthly fee concept was developed to encourage customers to maintain an account with the Agency where they are regular users and to recover some of the costs incurred for the account. Advantages of Elimination of the Monthly Account Maintenance Fee Increase in FasTrak Adoption by Infrequent Users Metro has received complaints from members of the public who acknowledge that they will not likely use the Metro ExpressLanes often enough to waive the fee and therefore have chosen not to opt-in to the Program. Eliminating the monthly account maintenance fee will encourage the participation of infrequent users, thereby increasing the rate of FasTrak adoption. Disadvantages of Elimination of the Monthly Account Maintenance Fee No Net Toll Revenue Generated for the 110 ExpressLanes 3 Currently, gross toll revenue is estimated at $18-$20 million annually, with approximately $10 million estimated for operations and maintenance. The balance is a net toll revenue estimate of $8-1 0 million to be reinvested in the corridor where generated in transit (capital or operations) and/or carpool lane improvements. This is a key sustainability element of the Program to provide ongoing reinvestment in congestion relief to the corresponding corridor communities. The elimination of the monthly account maintenance fee would increase Metro's operating costs by a minimum of approximately $7 million annually (split between the 110 and10), resulting in significantly (70%) less net toll revenue available for reinvestment in the 110 and 10 corridors. Further, since the 110 is forecast to gemerate less toll revenue than the 10, the elimination of the $3 account maintenance fee is expected to increase operating '

4 Additional operating costs associated with elimination of the monthly account maintenance fee are estimated at $250,000 for customer communication such as reprinting customer materials including applications, terms and conditions, brochures and information material, and re-training of staff. DETERMINATION OF SAFETY IMPACT There is no safety implication related to this Board Report. OCTA Yes Per Account $7.00 permo 112,973 (as of9/30/12) SANDAG Yes Per Account $4.50 permo 46,727 {as of 10/31/12). METRO Yes Per Account $3.00 permo 69,231 {as of 12/13/12) Total Current Accounts 644,931. Potential Pool (30% of total accounts) 193,479 Potential New Costs to Metro (Accounts x $3.00 $6,965,255 per month for 1 yr) TCA Yes Per Account $2.00 permo 416,000 (as of9/30/12) 1 expenses such that there will be no net toll revenue generated for the 11 0 Expresslanes. Increase in FasTrak Accounts Without Congestion Relief Benefit By creating a monthly account maintenance fee structure that is similar with other California agencies, Metro reduces the risk that the public will enroll with any one agency over the other and thus cannibalizing any existing program. For example, if Metro established too low of a fee, customers within and outside of Los Angeles County may opt to open up their account under Metro's program but not use the 110 or 10 Expresslanes. As a result, Metro would serve as a financial clearinghouse and be responsible for the administrative cost associated with managing that account but not receive the matching revenues nor the congestion relief and emission reduction benefit. As Table 3 below illustrates, the main driver of the $6.9 million increase in operating costs due to the elimination of the monthly maintenance fee is the ongoing monthly expense associated with maintaining inactive/infrequent accounts where toll revenue is not received by Metro. The calculation is based upon the current pool of local FasTrak accounts of 644,931, multiplied by 30% (the average percent of inactive/infrequent customer accounts likely to divert to Metro). This yields an estimate of more than 193,000 new inactive/infrequent FasTrak accounts to Metro. Metro would be charged $3 per month for each infrequent account, resulting in an operating expense increase of $6.9 million over 12 months. Table 3 Agency Has Fee How Are Fees Standard Current Accounts Policy? Assessed? Fee Amount \

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Expresslane user data. NEXT STEPS The full Board will consider the motion to eliminate the monthly account maintenance fee at the January 24, 2013 meeting. If approved, staff will report back to the February Board with a request to increase the Life of Project Budget, increase the FY13 budget, and amend the current contract with the toll systems operator. Prepared by: Stephanie Wiggins, Executive Officer 5 While it is not recommended that the monthly maintenance fee be eliminated for the reasons outlined in this report, the Metro Board could consider the following to address the significant increase in operating costs associated with elimination of the monthly account maintenance fee: Authorize the use of Prop C 25% highway funds to serve as a contingency for elimination of the monthly fee from the Expresslanes operation. However, Prop C 25% is currently programmed for highway projects. Any reallocation would delay a highway project. Increase the toll rates. The current range is $0.25 per mile to $1.40 per mile. Any increase to the toll rates would require a public hearing and would take up to four months to implement. Reduce the amount of the monthly account maintenance fee. This would still increase Metro's operating costs but not as much as the full elimination of the fee. Implement the monthly account maintenance fee as planned and reevaluate the need for the fee after the end of a 120 day period to ensure an analysis of Metro

9 JaO!JJO aa!lnoax3j8!48 Alndao JOIAej_ '8 1ned