While One in Five (19%) of Canadian Employees Feel at Psychological Risk in Their Workplace, New Tool Suggests that Three in Ten (29%) May Be

Similar documents
Insolvency Statistics in Canada. September 2015

Insolvency Statistics in Canada. April 2013

August 2015 Aboriginal Population Off-Reserve Package

October 2016 Aboriginal Population Off-Reserve Package

April 2017 Alberta Indigenous People Living Off-Reserve Package

November 2017 Alberta Indigenous People Living Off-Reserve Package

December 2017 Alberta Indigenous People Living Off-Reserve Package

January 2018 Alberta Indigenous People Living Off-Reserve Package

CCAA Statistics in Canada. Third Quarter of 2017

Alberta Labour Force Profiles

5 TH ANNUAL EXPEDIA VACATION DEPRIVATION SURVEY

Saskatchewan Labour Force Statistics

Highlights. For the purpose of this profile, the population is defined as women 15+ years.

2010 CSA Survey on Retirement and Investing

A Canada Wide Survey of Workplace Psychosocial Conditions

2016 Alberta Labour Force Profiles Women

2008 ANNUAL ALBERTA LABOUR MARKET REVIEW

STATISTICS CANADA RELEASES 2016 GDP DATA

2017 Alberta Labour Force Profiles Youth

Trends in Labour Productivity in Alberta

CCAA Statistics in Canada. Second Quarter of 2017

2012 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review

In-House Counsel Barometer 2009

The Aboriginal Economic Benchmarking Report. Core Indicator 1: Employment. The National Aboriginal Economic Development Board June, 2013

City of Edmonton Population Change by Age,

Average persons in household. Top three industries Post-secondary education (25 64 years) 7.1% Unemployment rate

Outlook for the Canadian Economy - Over the Next Year Total National: Improve = 42% (-1%), Worsen = 26% (+2%)

Provincial and National Employment, Alberta and Canada Employment Rates 1, % 62.7% 62.7% 63.0% 63.5%

Achieving High Performance in Healthcare Resource Allocation Organizations: Current Practice CADTH Symposium April 15-17, 2012

Quebec-Ontario: Demographics are shaping the labour market

April An Analysis of Nova Scotia s Productivity Performance, : Strong Growth, Low Levels CENTRE FOR LIVING STANDARDS

Investing in Canada s Future. Prosperity: An Economic Opportunity. for Canadian Industries

April An Analysis of Prince Edward Island s Productivity, : Falling Multifactor Productivity Dampens Labour Productivity Growth

Federal Politics Backgrounder: Comparing Online and Phone Horserace Results

New products and studies 19

Annual Alberta Labour Market Review

Alberta Minimum Wage Profile April March 2017

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

2017 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review

Quebec and Ontario: Employment Rises in March While the Unemployment Rate Treads Water

Annual. Labour. Market. Alberta. Review

Alberta s Labour Productivity Declined in 2016

Alberta Minimum Wage Profile April March 2018

KEY SMALL BUSINESS STATISTICS

Canadian School Board Structure and Trustee Profile

April An Analysis of Saskatchewan s Productivity, : Capital Intensity Growth Drives Strong Labour Productivity Performance CENTRE FOR

Policy Brief. Canada s Labour Market Puts in a Strong Performance in The Canadian Chamber is committed to fostering.

STATUS OF WOMEN OFFICE. Socio-Demographic Profiles of Saskatchewan Women. Aboriginal Women

Nova Scotia Labour Market Review

CANADIAN MANUFACTURERS & EXPORTERS BUSINESS CONDITIONS SURVEY

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

Canada 2015 Tracking Voting Intentions in Canada. For Publication Friday, September 4, 2015

Federal and Provincial/Territorial Tax Rates for Income Earned

Politics in Canada. For Publication February 9, 2016

Key Stats. Second highest small business concentration of major cities in Canada. - Statistics Canada, 2016

Survey Release: National and BC Investor Research

Retirement NOW REPORT. Life s brighter under the sun

Three in Ten Ontarians (27%) Fail Quiz on Auto Insurance Fraud One in Ten (8%) Admit to Having Engaged in Auto Insurance Fraud

KEY SMALL BUSINESS STATISTICS


Reference Point May 2015

Monthly Labour Force Survey Statistics November 2018

Monthly Labour Force Survey Statistics December 2018

GOAL 0: GDP GROWTH. By 2028, New Brunswick will experience an upward trend that returns its GDP growth rate to 2008 levels. Status: NOT PROGRESSING

Net interest income on average assets and liabilities Table 66

2001 COOPERATIVE CREDIT ASSOCIATIONS - (in thousands of dollars) TABLE 1 - ASSETS

151 Slater Street, Suite 710 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5H , Fax September, 2012

ALBERTA PROFILE: YOUTH

FINANCIAL RATIOS OF CANADIAN COMPANIES July 26, 2012 Alberto Calva // Acus Consulting Ltd

2003 BCSECCOM 371 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE MUTUAL RELIANCE REVIEW SYSTEM FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF APPLICATIONS AND

Perceptions Of Homelessness In Canada. GCI Group November, 2005

Trends in Labour Productivity in Alberta

April 2011 CENTRE FOR LIVING STANDARDS. CSLS Research Report i. Christopher Ross THE STUDY OF

Equifax Canada Reports-National Delinquency Rates Decline to Their Lowest Levels Ahead of the Holidays

Human Resources Trends for 2018 Insights on what HR leaders are expecting in the coming year Comprehensive report. September 2017

HUMAN RESOURCES INSTITUTE OF ALBERTA

BC JOBS PLAN ECONOMY BACKGROUNDER. Current statistics show that the BC Jobs Plan is working: The economy is growing and creating jobs.

Individual Taxation Tax Planning Guide

INVESTMENTS: BDC VIEWPOINTS STUDY SEPTEMBER Research and Market Intelligence at BDC

Athabasca Grande Prairie. Banff - Jasper - Rocky Mountain House. Edmonton. Calgary

Situation Analysis Updated October 9th, 2012

A Profile of Workplaces in Waterloo Region

Quebec Ontario: Strong Job Creation in November, With Unemployment at About 5.5%

Quebec and Ontario create jobs in May

ALBERTA PROFILE: YOUTH IN THE LABOUR FORCE

The Current and Future Contribution of the Aboriginal Community to the Economy of Saskatchewan

Employment Stumbles in Quebec and Falls in Ontario in August

Alberta led all Provinces in Economic Growth in 2014

Canada 2015 Tracking Voting Intentions in Canada. For Publication Thursday, September 24, 2015

Labour Market Information Monthly

The Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and the Territories

2. Full-time staffing intentions, next 3 months 3. General state of business health. 20 Bad 5 10 Down

MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENT LISTING REPRESENTATION AND STATUTORY RIGHTS OF ACTION DISCLOSURE EXEMPTIONS

SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Information and Communications Technology Labour Market in Canada

Tax Alert Canada Private company tax reform: Personal tax increases on noneligible dividends scheduled for 2018 and 2019

2. Full-time staffing intentions, next 3 months 3. General state of business health. * 12-month moving averages. * 12-month moving averages.

GOAL 6 FIRMS PARTICIPATING IN FOREIGN EXPORT TRADE

City of Lethbridge 2014 Community Satisfaction Survey. Key Findings August 2014

Oxford County Labour Market Overview

Transcription:

While One in Five (19%) of Canadian Employees Feel at Psychological Risk in Their Workplace, New Tool Suggests that Three in Ten (29%) May Be Groundbreaking Survey Suggests Canadian Employees Under-Report Risk in Their Workplace Public Release Date: April 20 th, 2009 Ipsos Reid is Canada's market intelligence leader and the country s leading provider of public opinion research. With operations in eight cities, Ipsos Reid employs more than 300 research professionals and support staff in Canada. The company has the biggest network of telephone call centres in Canada, as well as the largest pre-recruited household and on-line panels. Ipsos Reid s Canadian marketing research and public affairs practices are staffed with seasoned research consultants with extensive industry-specific backgrounds, offering the premier suite of research vehicles in Canada including the Ipsos Trend Report, the leading source of public opinion in the country all of which provide clients with actionable and relevant information. Ipsos Reid is an Ipsos company, a leading global survey-based market research group. To learn more, visit www.ipsos.ca For copies of news releases, please visit http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/

While One in Five (19%) of Canadian Employees Feel at Psychological Risk in Their Workplace, New Tool Suggests that Three in Ten (29%) May Be Groundbreaking Survey Suggests Canadian Employees Under-Report Risk in Their Workplace Toronto, ON Three in ten (29%) employed Canadians may be experiencing psychologically unsafe and unhealthy workplaces according to a groundbreaking new study produced by Simon Fraser University s Consortium for Organizational Mental Healthcare (COMH; www.comh.ca), a not-for-profit research centre in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University. The study was commissioned by the Great-West Life Centre for Mental Health in the Workplace and this survey was conducted by Ipsos Reid. The survey of some 6,800 Canadian workers suggests that while 19% of Canadian workers may subjectively believe they are in an unhealthy and unsafe psychosocial workplace, the figure rises by 10 full points to 29% when a newly developed set of 12 risk factor assessments is applied. This is the largest and most significant Canadian research to date that evaluates levels of psychosocial risk faced by employed Canadians at their place of work, with the findings used to help inform the design of a new online resource titled Guarding Minds @ Work (GM@W): A Workplace Guide to Psychological Safety & Health (www.guardingmindsatwork.ca). - 1 -

The study is part of a new, innovative online tool that will enable workers and their workplaces to self-evaluate along 12 distinct psychosocial risk factors ( PSRs ) in order to assess, understand, and proactively address organizational issues they may be facing. The evaluation is based on sixty (60) questions arrived at through a review of the empirical and legal literature, as well as extensive consultation with a wide range of workplace experts, stakeholders and participants. Many Workers Under-Report the Conditions of the Workplace An example of the insight yielded by the research is that one in five (19%) Canadian workers reject the subjective premise that Overall, my current workplace is a psychologically safe and healthy environment to work in 1 (two thirds 65% agree and 16% are neutral on their assessment). However, according to the scoring of the 12 PSRs, there are three in ten (29%) who fall into categories of serious (4%) or significant (25%) concerns in terms of the psychological risks associated with their workplace. And while many of the workers who fall in these categories do in fact recognize that their workplace is not psychologically safe and healthy (nearly half of these, 45%, disagree that their workplace is a psychologically safe and healthy one), more concerning are the proportions who offer neutral or even positive assessments of their workplaces in this regard: among those who fall in the serious or significant concerns categories, three in ten (28%) offer a neutral assessment and one in four (26%) give their workplace a positive rating in terms of its psychological safety and health. 1 Respondents were provided with the following definition: A psychologically safe and healthy workplace is one that promotes employees' psychological well-being and does not harm employee mental health in negligent, reckless or intentional ways. - 2 -

As such, many workers in Canada may, in fact, be working in psychologically risky work environments and not even be aware of it. Further, the research allows for the comparison of sectors, socio-demographics, regions, company size and numerous other descriptors. Those Most at Risk The findings suggest that those employees who are mainly involved in shift work, who work in a junior level position, are union members, non-management, male, not married, and working for medium or large companies are working in higher psychosocial risk workplaces. It would also appear that workers who fall into the serious concerns category are significantly more likely to be worried about losing their job and to feel that the recent economic downturn has had a negative impact on their workplace. They are significantly less likely to feel confident about their economic future. The PSR assessment also indicates that those sectors with employees most at risk are transportation and warehousing, manufacturing, health care and social assistance, and public administration. The findings of the study are quite consistent across province or region. - 3 -

Assessing the workplace based on twelve objective risk factor criteria After an exhaustive consultation process, twelve risk factor areas were established, with five agree/disagree statements per area, for a total of 60 questions. The risk factor areas are: Psychological Support; Organizational Culture; Clear Leadership & Expectations; Civility & Respect; Psychological Job Fit; Growth & Development; Recognition & Reward; Involvement & Influence; Workload Management; Engagement; Balance; and Psychological Protection. Each of the 12 PSRs addressed in the study was evaluated using a scoring system that measured levels of agreement with the five statements related to that particular risk factor. Scores were divided into four distinct risk-level categories corresponding with serious concerns, significant concerns, moderate concerns, and minimal concerns. While the aggregate at risk group of Canadian workers is 29%, the table below shows the proportions of Canadian workers at each risk factor level within each PSR. Risk Factor Area Serious Significant Moderate Minimal PSR1: Psychological Support PSR2: Organizational Culture PSR3: Clear Leadership & Expectations 7% 27% 37% 29% 8% 29% 37% 26% 7% 26% 35% 31% - 4 -

PSR4: Civility & Respect 6% 25% 37% 31% PSR5: Psychological Job Fit 4% 22% 40% 34% PSR6: Growth & Development PSR7: Recognition & Reward PSR8: Involvement & Influence PSR9: Workload Management 8% 25% 35% 33% 7% 25% 34% 34% 5% 19% 35% 41% 4% 25% 38% 33% PSR10: Engagement 2% 9% 30% 59% PSR11: Balance 7% 27% 34% 32% PSR12: Psychological Protection 9% 24% 34% 33% Findings by Sector The findings indicate that those sectors with employees more at risk are transportation and warehousing, and manufacturing Conversely, those sectors exhibiting the lowest levels of risk are professional, scientific and technical services; real estate, rental and leasing; and finance and insurance. The following table ranks the sectors by risk: - 5 -

Sector Serious Significant Total % Reporting Risk Transportation and warehousing 5% 35% 40% Manufacturing 5% 33% 38% Administrative and support/waste management and remediation services 5% 27% 32% Public administration 3% 29% 32% Health care and social assistance Arts, entertainment and recreation Mining and oil and gas extraction 4% 28% 32% 2% 28% 30% 2% 27% 29% Wholesale trade 4% 24% 28% Retail trade 4% 24% 28% Information and cultural industries Other services (except public administration) 3% 23% 26% 2% 24% 26% Utilities 3% 22% 25% - 6 -

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 3% 22% 25% Educational services 2% 23% 25% Construction 5% 19% 24% Finance and insurance 2% 22% 24% Real estate, rental and leasing Professional, scientific and technical services 4% 19% 23% 2% 18% 20% Socio-demographic and other Key Descriptors The findings suggest that those employees who are mainly involved in shift work, who work in a junior level position, are union members, non-management, male, working more than 50 hours per week, not married, and working for medium or large companies report working in higher risk workplaces as far as psychological health and safety are concerned. The following table ranks various socio-demographic and other key descriptors by risk: Descriptor Serious Significant Total % Reporting Risk Shift work 7% 34% 41% Junior level position 5% 34% 39% Union member 5% 33% 38% - 7 -

Non-management 4% 28% 32% Male 5% 26% 31% Earning less than $30,000 per year Earning between $30,000 and $60,000 per year Some post secondary education 5% 26% 31% 4% 27% 31% 4% 27% 31% Marital status: single 5% 25% 30% Marital status: separated/divorced/ widowed 5% 25% 30% Age: 35 to 54 4% 26% 30% 30-49 hours worked per week 50+ hours worked per week 4% 26% 30% 4% 25% 29% Private sector 4% 25% 29% For-profit 4% 25% 29% Permanent worker 4% 25% 29% Age: 55+ 4% 25% 29% Full-time 4% 25% 29% Urban 4% 25% 29% Rural 3% 26% 29% - 8 -

Public sector 3% 26% 29% Mid-level position 3% 25% 28% University education 3% 25% 28% Married/living commonlaw 3% 25% 28% Not-for-profit 3% 25% 28% 100-499 employees 3% 25% 28% Female 3% 24% 27% Earning $60,000-$100,000 per year 3% 24% 27% Seasonal worker 2% 25% 27% High school or less education 4% 22% 26% Part-time 3% 23% 26% Age: 18-34 3% 23% 26% Earning $100,000 + per year 4% 21% 25% Non-union 3% 22% 25% 0-99 employees 3% 21% 24% Less than 30 hours worked per week 3% 20% 23% Managing others 3% 20% 23% Contract 2% 19% 21% Senior level 2% 17% 19% - 9 -

Self-employed 1% 11% 12% It would also appear that workers who fall into the serious concerns category are significantly more likely to be worried about losing their job and to feel that the recent economic downturn has had a negative impact on their workplace. They are significantly less likely to feel confident about their economic future. Strongly/Somewhat agree Summary Table: TOTAL PSR OVERALL PSR SCORE Serious Significant concerns concerns Moderate concerns Minimal concerns A B C D Base: All Respondents Unweighted Base 6807 249 1728 2682 2148 Weighted Base 6807 251 1720 2704 2132 1) I am worried about losing my job 2) The recent economic downturn has had a very negative impact on my workplace 3) I expect my personal financial or economic situation to be at least the same or better one year from now, compared to what it is like today 1783 124 576 702 382 26% 49% 33% 26% 18% 3179 153 941 1259 825 47% 61% 55% 47% 39% 4950 131 1074 2026 1720 73% 52% 62% 75% 81% - 10 -

Province/Region Province/Region Serious Significant Total % Reporting Risk Ontario 4% 26% 30% Québec 3% 27% 30% PEI/Newfoundland and Labrador 5% 24% 29% Saskatchewan 4% 25% 29% British Columbia 4% 24% 28% Alberta 4% 23% 27% Manitoba 3% 22% 25% Nova Scotia 1% 24% 25% New Brunswick 2% 22% 24% NWT/Yukon/Nunavut 0 20% 20% These are some of the findings of a poll conducted on behalf of the Consortium for Organizational Mental Healthcare (COMH) from March 19 to April 7, 2009. This online survey of 6,807 employed Canadian adults was conducted via the Ipsos I-Say Online Panel, Ipsos Reid's national online panel. The results of this poll are based on a sample where quota sampling and weighting were employed to balance demographics and ensure that the sample's composition reflects that of the actual employed Canadian population according to Census data. Quota samples with weighting from the Ipsos online panel provide results that are intended to approximate a probability sample. Statistical margins of error are not applicable to online polls, however an unweighted probability sample of this size, with a - 11 -

100% response rate, would have an estimated margin of error of +/- 1.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20, had the entire population of employed adults in Canada been polled. For more information on this factum, please contact: John Wright Senior Vice President and Managing Director Ipsos Reid (416) 324-2002 For full tabular results, please visit our website at www.ipsos.ca. News Releases are available at: http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/ - 12 -