Veltassa Q1 Revs Light; Cash Burn Suggests Financing may be Necessary in Early 2017

Similar documents
Video March 1, StratTV at the TMT Conference. Watch the video: Related Research

Interview with CFO Stephen Nolan

Can P-VOD Save Hollywood?

January TIC Data Update: Overseas Investors Decreased Agency MBS by $3.6bn

Pipeline Tracker: What's changed?

Who s Using XBRL Data & Why: Case Studies

Tobacco Pricing Power Far From Extinguished

Cempra Inc November 16, 2015

Steel March 15, Mid-Quarter Guidance Preview: Looking

Overall GED % Responder Rate of 15% Matches Comps Placebo Rate

Deep Discount Cigarette Share Gains Elevate Pricing Concerns

Data Suggests Fitusiran & Givosiran Effective, But Safety Questions Likely To Persist

Research Tactical Idea

2018 Hong Kong Summit Feedback

ASEAN4 Most Productive Companies

Our Thoughts On the Preannouncement

1st Take: FDA wants to educate US physicians about the basics of biosimilars

SHARED AUTONOMY. Adam Jonas, CFA Apple is covered by Katy Huberty; Google is covered by Brian Nowak

1Q16 EPS Above Lowered Expectations

First Take: Building on the core

XL Group PLC February 3, 2016

USD Sensitivity. Source: Getty Images

Proposed China Tariff on US Pork Negative for HRL/TSN

Making the Right Moves in Sports Betting

Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. (CP.N) Closed Research Tactical Idea

Lowering Outlook Following 3Q, Merger Filing Forecast

Visa Inc. February 29, 2016

Paradise. 4Q13: In line with consensus

No Substitute for Execution; Remain OW

Filgotinib Moving Ahead With Good Data in PsA

In the Penalty Box But Valuation Remains Compelling

1st Take: November Sales On Track Despite YoY Decline

Acquisition of Lafarge/Holcim assets

Kohl's May 14, Not So Great 1Q; Bull Thesis Fading

Sinisi's Shop Food Retail Pricing Study (Vol. 45, August '18)

Portfolio Strategy. The Endowment Model: Theory and More Experience

Slower near-term momentum but we expect long-term targets to be reached in OW

Strong Underlying Metrics Point To Upside Potential

EASL 2016 Abstracts: Implications for Our Coverage

New Pipeline Investment Supportive, But We Still See Downside to Consensus

Price/Earnings Ratios, Risk Premiums and the g* Adjustment

2017 Results Largely In Line

Earnings Observations: EPS Beats Driving Outsized Moves, Where to Go from Here

2018 Guidance Reduction Sets an Achievable Bar

Healthcare Premium Priced In

More Visibility on FY After Q1 Upside, But Valuation Now Appropriate

Q Conference October 18 th, 2006 Santa Barbara, CA

The Worst Behind Them; Raising PT, Upgrade to EW

Industry Analysis. BRICs and Motors

Nike Inc. October 15, 2015

7 Key Takes from Meetings with SFM Management

Model Updates. March 15, Healthcare Services & Distribution MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH. Ashley E Ponce

Should We Be Concerned About Industrial Exposure?

Emergency Liquidity Assistance in the Euro Area

Field Trip Takeaways: Sustained Focus on Network Efficiency

CTSH: Is The Bar Low Enough?

4Q15 Miss: Yet Refiners Hit Seasonal Inflection

1st Take: Stronger than Expected December Shipments Thanks to Upturn

1st Take: OJK suspends new account opening

Coffee Talk: A Look at February US Scanner Data

The Robotic Dilemma. Do surgical robots equate to an existential dilemma for SN's orthopedics business? Overweight. Attractive.

Weaker NPAT, driven by higher. formation; LDR over 100%

Research Tactical Idea

March 22, Is An Ultra-Bear Scenario in Play?

ACCC, A4ANZ, BARA & BARNZ vs Airports, MQA in the ASX100

Raiffeisen International

Mixed Bag in 2Q, Array Growth Accelerates

Indra May 12, Problem contracts & elections drive significant 1Q15 shortfall. Problem contracts and elections falling away drove a topline miss

Corporate Travel Survey 2018 Stronger Trends: Intra-EU & Asia Are Key Drivers

2Q16: External Pressures Return

Letter from New York. In-Line. Equal-weight $ What's new: we hosted a day of investor meetings in NY with Dunkin Brand CFO Paul Carbone.

Upbeat Tone in Barcelona - Questions

4Q15 Earnings Preview

Tower Tour Reinforces Our Positive View on the Towers

Prudent Bet On Low Oil Prices

Our Thoughts on Biosimilar hype

Green Dot Corp February 25, 2016

GPhA thoughts and highlights: further consolidation appears inevitable

BorsodChem MDI Suspension Likely to Further Boost Market Sentiment; Positive for Wanhua

Global Strategy Forum: Renaissance Meets Reality

GoPro Inc January 13, 2016

Balanced Portfolio and Gross Margin Upside Drive 1Q Results

5 Telco Questions Ahead of MS SF TMT Conference

PASPA Overturned: US Sports Betting To Open Up

Scent of Morning: Eight Questions for Japan Investors in Japan Economics. Japan Economics

1Q Report Doesn't Answer Main Question; Stay EW

Some Puts and Takes in Q2; Thesis Unchanged, Stay EW

CAR Inc. May 18, 2016

Strong 4Q15 Results. Stock Rating Equal-weight. Price target $7.50. Industry View In-Line

IT Hardware February 29, 2016

Structural Headwinds Likely Continue Beyond 2017

Highly Levered In A Rising Market

RenaissanceRe February 4, 2016

Tax Reform Still at the Drawing Board

Closed-End Equity Funds

Growth Story On Track; Near-Term Momentum Seems Sustainable

Expect a Slight EPS Miss, But Revenue Miss Could be the Bigger Story

The Four Questions that will determine go / no-go on EP separation

Transcription:

May 5, 2016 Relypsa, Inc. Veltassa Q1 Revs Light; Cash Burn Suggests Financing may be Necessary in Early 2017 Industry View In-Line Stock Rating Underweight Price Target $9.00 Relypsa reported $592k of Veltassa sales in the drug's first full launch quarter, 25% below consensus expectations. Expenses and cash burn continue to represent a concern as launch headwinds (payor and prescribing dynamics) persist. Physicians appear to be cautiously prescribing the drug. Relypsa provided Q1 2016 results, reporting Veltassa revenues that were 25% below consensus and expenses that were generally in-line with expectations. While the company appears to be making some headway on reaching clinicians, the number of scripts written by each physician is low, suggesting that it will take significant time to develop this market. On the payor front, the rejection rate appears to be trending downward from the 40% we calculated from the Symphony Health claims data during the first few weeks of the launch to 20%, more in-line with that seen with other nephrology drugs like Keryx's Auryxia. Other metrics mentioned on the call were not as favorable, with very low conversion rates of patients to paid scripts from samples and long fill times impacting uptake. The company's gross to net adjustment is inline with our forecasts, at 25%, but we expect the margins to be pressured in an increasingly competitive market. We also remain concerned about the company's extremely high cash burn rate and low reserve, despite the recent debt deal. The company did not provide an update to prior guidance on expenses when asked during the Q&A session, and based on our forecasts, we think Relypsa may need to secure additional funding in early 2017. Our interpretation of the terms of the agreement suggest that they may have encumbered the options for additional financing. Key points from the call are highlighted below: Veltassa 1Q16 net revenue of $592k below our estimate and consensus. Relypsa reported $592k of net Veltassa revenue in Q1, below our estimate of $630k and consensus of $791k (Bloomberg). Gross-to-net adjustment was 25% for the quarter and included some one-time fees paid to distributors. While management indicated this would likely improve in the remainder of 2016 absent the one-time fees, we believe this represents a reasonable estimate of long-term gross-to-net, given the amount of rebates and discounts typically needed to secure favorable formulary placement and the expected imminent introduction of a competing product in AstraZeneca's ZS-9. Grossto-net adjustments typically increase in competitive markets. Operating expenses generally in-line, though $80mn quarterly cash MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC Andrew S Berens Andrew.Berens@morganstanley.com Thomas J Smith Thomas.J.Smith@morganstanley.com Relypsa, Inc. ( RLYP.O, RLYP US ) +1 212 761-3017 +1 212 761-6209 Biotechnology / United States of America Stock Rating Underweight Industry View In-Line Price target $9.00 Shr price, close (May 4, 2016) $14.00 Mkt cap, curr (mm) $588 52-Week Range $37.45-10.26 Fiscal Year Ending 12/15 12/16e 12/17e 12/18e ModelWare EPS ($) (4.39) (6.25) (5.14) (4.03) Prior ModelWare EPS - (5.82) (4.13) (3.19) ($) P/E NM NM NM NM Consensus EPS ($) (4.34) (5.58) (4.24) (2.55) Div yld (%) - - - - Unless otherwise noted, all metrics are based on Morgan Stanley ModelWare framework = Consensus data is provided by Thomson Reuters Estimates e = Morgan Stanley Research estimates QUARTERLY MODELWARE EPS ($) 2016e 2016e 2017e 2017e Quarter 2015 Prior Current Prior Current Q1 (0.78) - (1.26)a - - Q2 (0.95) (1.44) (1.60) - - Q3 (1.24) (1.47) (1.67) - - Q4 (1.40) (1.47) (1.71) - - e = Morgan Stanley Research estimates, a = Actual Company reported data Morgan Stanley does and seeks to do business with companies covered in Morgan Stanley Research. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of Morgan Stanley Research. Investors should consider Morgan Stanley Research as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For analyst certification and other important disclosures, refer to the Disclosure Section, located at the end of this report. 1

burn remains a concern with more capital potentially needed in early 2017. Relypsa recorded $67mn of operating expense, generally in-line with our $68mn estimate and consensus $69mn (Thomson). In the Q&A session, management declined to update previously issued expense guidance of $275mn-$300mn (including $20mn-$25mn in non-cash based compensation), suggesting the rate will remain very high and a focus of investors. Importantly, the company exited Q1 with an $80mn operating cash burn. The pro-forma cash balance amount of $336mn (following the $150mn debt deal, see our note here), suggests operating income for slightly more than 4 additional quarters, which magnifies the relevance of a covenant to the term loan requiring a minimum cash balance of $45mn until the company achieves revenues of >$85mn across four consecutive quarters. Assuming an operational burn rate of $60mn-$70mn per quarter vs. the pro-forma cash balance, we expect Relypsa will need to raise additional capital in early 2017. We also note the company has an additional $30mn under its existing at-themarket (ATM) agreement, which could lead to incremental dilution during 2016. We believe that Relypsa's cash burn and financing will continue to remain an overhang on shares in the absence of a meaningful inflection in Veltassa scripts, despite the recent debt deal. Declining rejection rate a positive, though we still view payor dynamics (prior authorizations and formulary placement) as significant launch headwinds. Management noted that of their target payors (covering 85% of intended patient lives), 50% had made formulary coverage decisions and 75% of those making decisions had placed Veltassa in tier 3 or better, although it is unclear what percentage have given Veltassa preferential (preferred brand) status given the varying tier structures across plans (ie 4 tier vs 5 tier formularies). This is arguably one of the most important determinants of coverage and uptake. Importantly, the company also noted that Medicare Part D formulary decisions were taking longer than originally anticipated, as these plans have six months from commercialization until they are required to make a decision vs. previous expectation of 6 months from approval. The company indicated that insurance claim rejection rates have been declining, and are currently at about 20%. While this declining trend is a positive, especially relative to the much higher rejection rates seen earlier in the launch (see our note here for an analysis of Symphony Health claims data), the company did not address abandoned prescriptions or average copay amounts which may be hindering uptake. Management also noted that the majority of prescriptions require prior authorizations, representing another hurdle to paid prescription uptake. We continue to view the challenging payor dynamics as a significant launch headwind. Lengthy time to fill prescriptions likely to be barrier to uptake, especially after ZS-9 launches. The company acknowledged that the time to fill the Veltassa prescriptions was taking longer than expected, resulting in a delay in getting paid drug to patients. We note that Veltassa Konnect recently changed the amount of initial free drug dispensed to a 15-day supply, an increase from previous 10 day start packs, suggesting this time may be exceeding 10 days in some cases, with the extra drug being provided to bridge the delay. While the company did not go into much detail, we believe the lengthy time to fill may be related to (1) logistics of dealing with mail-order specialty pharmacy, (2) prior authorizations implemented by payors, and (3) 2

non-preferential formulary status leading some patients to delay filling or abandon their prescription. Unless the company is able to improve this metric, we think it will be a significant handicap vs. AstraZeneca's ZS-9, which will be distributed via traditional retail pharmacy channels. We also believe AstraZeneca will have more operating expense leverage to be able to offer incentives that could facilitate more expedient and favorable payor treatment. We also note this 50% increase in the number of free days of drug is likely to lead to incremental SG&A expense. Early launch numbers suggest conservative adoption among physicians as well as limited patient pool. Management noted that ~5,000 prescriptions had been written for Veltassa by ~1,700 physicians, or approximately 2.9 prescriptions per physician since launch. The company explained these low prescriptions per physician as being related to conservative initial prescribing patterns by physicians as they gain anecdotal experience with Veltassa before widespread usage in their practices. We also think this could suggest that there may not be many patients physicians have proactively identified as early candidates for the drug. Whatever the etiology of the low rate of usage per clinician, we believe it will be important for this metric to grow for the drug to generate significant revenues. CRL for six month room temperature storage and TOURMALINE trial read-out headline regulatory and clinical updates. Management disclosed that they have received a complete response letter (CRL) from the FDA for the requested label change to allow room temperature storage of Veltassa for up to six months. The current label allows room temperature storage for only three months. This label constraint may ultimately limit Relypsa's ability to sample, an issue which could emerge should AstraZeneca choose to widely sample ZS-9, which is not expected to have any cold storage requirements. The company also recently submitted an snda for a second API manufacturer, an important step toward building scale and improving gross margins (currently around 67%). Relypsa also expects to file an snda in mid- 2016 seeking to revise the Veltassa label to reflect data from the human DDI studies completed in January. On clinical updates, Relypsa expects data from the ongoing TOURMALINE trial (see trial description here) to read out in 3Q, which may facilitate a label change allow for Veltassa administration with or without food. Currently the label requires administration with food. 3

Relypsa Risk Reward Regulatory and Commercial Risk to Weigh on RLYP $ 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Price Target $9 Bull $32 Risk-Adjusted SOP Base $9 Risk-Adjusted SOP $14.00 $32.00 (+129%) $9.00 (-36%) $6.00 (-57%) 0 May-14 Nov-14 May-15 Nov-15 May-16 Nov-16 May-17 Price Target (May-17) Historical Stock Performance Current Stock Price Source: Company data, Morgan Stanley Research WARNINGDONOTEDIT_RRS4RL~RLYP.O~ We derive our PT from a risk-adjusted sum-of-the-parts (SOP) analysis. We forecast expected revenue/profits for each drug/condition combination with varying commercial assumptions for base/bull/bear cases. We assume a 6.5% WACC and terminal value of 2.5x the 2030 cash flow to derive our NPV. We then assign a probability factor for each drug/condition to reflect clinical and regulatory risks/timing, sum the risk-adjusted NPVs and add cash in excess of required investment. Veltassa's commercial launch is successful, with rapid uptake driven by broad, unrestricted payor access and a dramatic change to the current treatment paradigm, as physicians quickly shift from episodic to chronic treatment of hyperkalemia. Human DDI data in 2016 alleviate FDA concerns, and black boxed warning on the label is removed as a result. We model uptake as 3.5x our base US sales, or ~$550mn at peak. Veltassa has a tepid launch negatively impacted by multiple commercial challenges, including the drug's slow onset of action, black box warning against drug-drug interactions, logistical issues, lack of formulary coverage, and lack of physician awareness. We forecast launch year (2016) sales of $9mn, and peak US sales of ~$160mn. Investment Thesis We are Underweight Relypsa given our view that the company's lead product, Veltassa, faces significant commercialization hurdles for the treatment of hyperkalemia. Veltassa label limits the commercial opportunity. The drug has a black box warning that indicates Veltassa should be administered at least 6 hours apart from other oral medications. Given this burden, we believe patients may be deterred from taking Veltassa. The slow onset of action and HUB distribution will likely limit Veltassa use. Veltassa's slow onset of action is a disadvantage and the centralized HUB distribution will delay delivery to patients. 87% of physicians in our AlphaWise survey indicated the HUB distribution model impacts their decision to prescribe Veltassa acutely in patients with serum K+ above 6.0 meq/l. Veltassa will likely face reimbursement hurdles further curtailing launch expectations. Our survey indicated ~1/3 of physicians view Veltassa's product profile as a next-generation kayexalate. Given no outcomes studies have been conducted on RAASI benefit, we anticipate Veltassa will have a difficult time gaining traction with payers. Key Value Drivers The main valuation drivers are perceived clinical and regulatory risks for patiromer, and the commercial launch execution. Potential Catalysts AstraZeneca / ZS Pharma's ZS-9 PDUFA 5/26/16 Veltassa snda filing for human DDI data mid- 2016 AstraZeneca/ZS Pharma ZS-9 CHMP opinion 2H16 Bear $6 Cash Value Uptake of Veltassa is less than our below-consensus forecasts, as the drug's significant commercial hurdles lead to lackluster adoption. We believe the floor valuation in this scenario is the company's cash value, which we estimate as ~$6 per share. Risks to Achieving Price Target Veltassa launch exceeds expectations. Competitor product ZS-9 fails to gain approval. Strategic optionality / M&A 4

Valuation Exhibit 1: RLYP Risk-Adjusted Sum-of-the-Parts Valuation Source: Company data, Morgan Stanley Research Our $9 price target includes Veltassa usage in patients with hyperkalemia, mostly in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart failure (HF), and dialysis. Our Underweight thesis and price target are based predominantly on the commercial outlook for Veltassa, and our revenue estimates are meaningfully below consensus. Valuation Methodology: We use a risk-adjusted sum-of-the-parts methodology to value Relypsa, examining the clinical, regulatory, and commercial risks and opportunities for each individual indication and region, and assigned a probability of success to account for the likelihood of achieving those revenues/expenses. Discount Rate: We use a discount rate of 6.5% for RLYP, in-line with the company s historical WACC. Terminal Growth Rate: Our model forecasts the revenues and expenses for each opportunity to 2030. We apply a 2.5x multiple to the 2030 cash flows to account for the terminal value of each asset. 5

Income Statement Exhibit 2: RLYP Income Statement Relypsa Income Statement ($ in millions except per-share data) 2013A 2014A 2015A 1Q16A 2Q16E 3Q16E 4Q16E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E Sales US Patiromer Sales 0 0.592 1.9 2.6 3.4 8.5 21.0 31 40 48 EU Patiromer Sales 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.8 5 9 12 WW Patiromer Sales 0.0 0.592 1.9 2.6 3.4 8.5 21.8 36 48 60 Revenue to Relypsa US Patiromer Sales 0.0 0.592 1.9 2.6 3.4 8.5 21.0 31 40 48 EU Patiromer Royalty 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.1 1 1 2 WW Patiromer Revenue to Relypsa 0 0.592 1.9 2.6 3.4 8.5 21.1 32 41 50 Other 0 19 11.8 2.0 0.5 0.5 15 7 0 0 0 Total Revenues YoY Revenue Growth 0.0 0.0 18.6 12.4 3.9 3.1 3.9 23.3 27.8 19% 31.9 15% 41.1 29% 50.1 22% COGS 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 7 9 10 10 YoY Growth - - 158.8% 26.8% 6.6% -2.9% % of US Revenue 13.2% 25% 35% 40% 33% 35% 30% 25% 20% R&D 59 50 93 16.3 18.0 18.0 18.0 70 45 25 15 15 YoY Growth 63.6% -14.8% 85.8% 3.2% -3.4% -44.4% -32.1% -24.7% -36.0% -44.4% -40.0% 0.0% % of Revenue 301.4% 161.9% 78.5% 36.5% 30.0% SG&A 12 28 103 50.6 53.0 55.0 57.0 216 225 235 245 252 YoY Growth 63.9% 133.8% 269.5% 275.3% 160.6% 117.8% 29.4% 109.1% 4.4% 4.2% 4.5% 2.7% % of Revenue 924.4% 810.4% 736.3% 596.5% 502.9% Total Operating Expenses 70.9 78.1 196.4 67.0 71.5 73.9 76.4 288.7 277.5 268.9 270.1 276.4 Operating Income (Loss) (71) (78) (178) (55) (68) (71) (72) (265) (250) (237) (229) (226) Operating Margin - - (959.0%) (1138.0%) (898.8%) (744.0%) (557.2%) (452.1%) Other Income and Interest Income (1.5) 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Interest Expense (1.45) (1.90) (1.75) (0.4) (2.9) (4.3) (4.3) (11.9) (17.3) (17.3) (13.8) (9.2) Pretax Income (Loss) ($74) ($80) ($179) ($55) ($70) ($75) ($77) ($277) ($267) ($254) ($242) ($235) Provision For Income Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Effective Tax Rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Non-GAAP Net Income (Loss) (Post-ESO) ($74) ($80) ($179) ($55) ($70) ($75) ($77) ($277) ($267) ($254) ($242) ($235) Stock Compensation Expense $4 $9.695 $19 $8 $6 $6 $6 $26.9 $38 $39 $39 $40 % of Operating Expenses 5.5% 12.4% 9.8% 12.0% 9% 9% 9% 9% 14% 15% 15% 15% Non-GAAP Net Income (incl. ESO) ($74) ($80) ($179) ($55) ($70) ($75) ($77) ($277) ($267) ($254) ($242) ($235) Non-GAAP Net Income (excl. ESO) ($70) ($70) ($159) ($47) ($64) ($69) ($70) ($250) ($229) ($215) ($203) ($195) EPS, Basic (Non-GAAP, Pre-ESO) ($19.32) ($2.14) ($3.92) ($1.07) ($1.46) ($1.53) ($1.56) ($5.64) ($4.41) ($3.41) ($2.72) ($2.26) EPS, Diluted (Non-GAAP, Pre-ESO) ($19.32) ($2.14) ($3.92) ($1.07) ($1.46) ($1.53) ($1.56) ($5.64) ($4.41) ($3.41) ($2.72) ($2.26) EPS - Diluted (GAAP, Post- ESO) ($20.40) ($2.43) ($4.39) ($1.26) ($1.60) ($1.67) ($1.71) ($6.25) ($5.14) ($4.03) ($3.25) ($2.72) Shares Outstanding - Basic 3.6 32.8 40.7 43.5 44.1 44.8 44.9 44.3 51.9 63.0 74.6 86.3 Shares Outstanding - Diluted 3.6 32.8 40.7 43.5 44.1 44.8 44.9 44.3 51.9 63.0 74.6 86.3 Source: Company data, Morgan Stanley Research 6

Disclosure Section The information and opinions in Morgan Stanley Research were prepared by Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, and/or Morgan Stanley C.T.V.M. S.A., and/or Morgan Stanley Mexico, Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., and/or Morgan Stanley Canada Limited. As used in this disclosure section, "Morgan Stanley" includes Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley C.T.V.M. S.A., Morgan Stanley Mexico, Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., Morgan Stanley Canada Limited and their affiliates as necessary. For important disclosures, stock price charts and equity rating histories regarding companies that are the subject of this report, please see the Morgan Stanley Research Disclosure Website at www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures, or contact your investment representative or Morgan Stanley Research at 1585 Broadway, (Attention: Research Management), New York, NY, 10036 USA. For valuation methodology and risks associated with any recommendation, rating or price target referenced in this research report, please contact the Client Support Team as follows: US/Canada +1 800 303-2495; Hong Kong +852 2848-5999; Latin America +1 718 754-5444 (U.S.); London +44 (0)20-7425-8169; Singapore +65 6834-6860; Sydney +61 (0)2-9770-1505; Tokyo +81 (0)3-6836-9000. Alternatively you may contact your investment representative or Morgan Stanley Research at 1585 Broadway, (Attention: Research Management), New York, NY 10036 USA. Analyst Certification The following analysts hereby certify that their views about the companies and their securities discussed in this report are accurately expressed and that they have not received and will not receive direct or indirect compensation in exchange for expressing specific recommendations or views in this report: Andrew S Berens. Unless otherwise stated, the individuals listed on the cover page of this report are research analysts. Global Research Conflict Management Policy Morgan Stanley Research has been published in accordance with our conflict management policy, which is available at www.morganstanley.com/institutional/research/conflictpolicies. Important US Regulatory Disclosures on Subject Companies As of April 29, 2016, Morgan Stanley beneficially owned 1% or more of a class of common equity securities of the following companies covered in Morgan Stanley Research: Akebia Therapeutics Inc, Amgen Inc., DBV Technologies SA, GW Pharmaceuticals PLC, ImmunoGen Inc., Juno Therapeutics Inc, Ophthotech Corp, Rockwell Medical Inc. Within the last 12 months, Morgan Stanley managed or co-managed a public offering (or 144A offering) of securities of Acceleron Pharma Inc, Akebia Therapeutics Inc, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, BeiGene Ltd, Biogen Inc, Bluebird Bio Inc, Celgene Corp, Chimerix Inc, DBV Technologies SA, Editas Medicine, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences Inc., Global Blood Therapeutics Inc, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc., MacroGenics Inc, Ocular Therapeutix Inc, Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc, Regenxbio Inc, Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. Within the last 12 months, Morgan Stanley has received compensation for investment banking services from Acceleron Pharma Inc, Akebia Therapeutics Inc, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, BeiGene Ltd, Biogen Inc, Bluebird Bio Inc, Celgene Corp, Chimerix Inc, DBV Technologies SA, Editas Medicine, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences Inc., Global Blood Therapeutics Inc, GW Pharmaceuticals PLC, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc., MacroGenics Inc, Ocular Therapeutix Inc, Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Regenxbio Inc, Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. In the next 3 months, Morgan Stanley expects to receive or intends to seek compensation for investment banking services from Acceleron Pharma Inc, Akebia Therapeutics Inc, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, BeiGene Ltd, Biogen Inc, Bluebird Bio Inc, Celgene Corp, Cempra Inc, Chimerix Inc, DBV Technologies SA, Editas Medicine, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences Inc., Global Blood Therapeutics Inc, GW Pharmaceuticals PLC, ImmunoGen Inc., Incyte Corp, Infinity Pharmaceuticals Inc, Innoviva Inc, Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Juno Therapeutics Inc, Keryx Biopharmaceuticals Inc, MacroGenics Inc, Ocular Therapeutix Inc, Ophthotech Corp, Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Regenxbio Inc, Relypsa, Inc., Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc, Versartis, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Within the last 12 months, Morgan Stanley has received compensation for products and services other than investment banking services from Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Biogen Inc, Celgene Corp, Gilead Sciences Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Within the last 12 months, Morgan Stanley has provided or is providing investment banking services to, or has an investment banking client relationship with, the following company: Acceleron Pharma Inc, Akebia Therapeutics Inc, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, BeiGene Ltd, Biogen Inc, Bluebird Bio Inc, Celgene Corp, Cempra Inc, Chimerix Inc, DBV Technologies SA, Editas Medicine, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences Inc., Global Blood Therapeutics Inc, GW Pharmaceuticals PLC, ImmunoGen Inc., Incyte Corp, Infinity Pharmaceuticals Inc, Innoviva Inc, Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Juno Therapeutics Inc, Keryx Biopharmaceuticals Inc, MacroGenics Inc, Ocular Therapeutix Inc, Ophthotech Corp, Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Regenxbio Inc, Relypsa, Inc., Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc, Versartis, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Within the last 12 months, Morgan Stanley has either provided or is providing non-investment banking, securities-related services to and/or in the past has entered into an agreement to provide services or has a client relationship with the following company: Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Biogen Inc, Celgene Corp, Gilead Sciences Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC makes a market in the securities of Acceleron Pharma Inc, Akebia Therapeutics Inc, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Biogen Inc, Bluebird Bio Inc, Celgene Corp, Cempra Inc, Chimerix Inc, DBV Technologies SA, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences Inc., Global Blood Therapeutics Inc, GW Pharmaceuticals PLC, ImmunoGen Inc., Incyte Corp, Infinity Pharmaceuticals Inc, Innoviva Inc, Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Juno Therapeutics Inc, Keryx Biopharmaceuticals Inc, MacroGenics Inc, Ocular Therapeutix Inc, Ophthotech Corp, Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Regenxbio Inc, Relypsa, Inc., Rockwell Medical Inc, Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc, Versartis, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc is a corporate broker to AstraZeneca. The equity research analysts or strategists principally responsible for the preparation of Morgan Stanley Research have received compensation based upon various factors, including quality of research, investor client feedback, stock picking, competitive factors, firm revenues and overall investment banking revenues. Morgan Stanley and its affiliates do business that relates to companies/instruments covered in Morgan Stanley Research, including market making, providing liquidity, fund management, commercial banking, extension of credit, investment services and investment banking. Morgan Stanley sells to and buys from customers the securities/instruments of companies covered in Morgan Stanley Research on a principal basis. Morgan Stanley may have a position in the debt of the Company or instruments discussed in this report. Morgan Stanley trades or may trade as principal in the debt securities (or in related derivatives) that are the subject of the debt research report. Certain disclosures listed above are also for compliance with applicable regulations in non-us jurisdictions. STOCK RATINGS Morgan Stanley uses a relative rating system using terms such as Overweight, Equal-weight, Not-Rated or Underweight (see definitions below). Morgan Stanley does not assign ratings of Buy, Hold or Sell to the stocks we cover. Overweight, Equal-weight, Not-Rated and Underweight are not the equivalent of buy, hold and sell. Investors should carefully read the definitions of all ratings used in Morgan Stanley Research. In addition, since Morgan Stanley Research contains more complete information concerning the analyst's views, investors should carefully read Morgan Stanley Research, in its entirety, and not infer the contents from the rating alone. In any case, ratings (or research) should not be used or relied upon as investment advice. An investor's decision to buy or sell a stock should depend on individual circumstances (such as the investor's existing holdings) and other considerations. Global Stock Ratings Distribution 7

(as of April 30, 2016) The Stock Ratings described below apply to Morgan Stanley's Fundamental Equity Research and do not apply to Debt Research produced by the Firm. For disclosure purposes only (in accordance with NASD and NYSE requirements), we include the category headings of Buy, Hold, and Sell alongside our ratings of Overweight, Equal-weight, Not-Rated and Underweight. Morgan Stanley does not assign ratings of Buy, Hold or Sell to the stocks we cover. Overweight, Equal-weight, Not-Rated and Underweight are not the equivalent of buy, hold, and sell but represent recommended relative weightings (see definitions below). To satisfy regulatory requirements, we correspond Overweight, our most positive stock rating, with a buy recommendation; we correspond Equal-weight and Not-Rated to hold and Underweight to sell recommendations, respectively. COVERAGE UNIVERSE INVESTMENT BANKING CLIENTS (IBC) STOCK RATING CATEGORY COUNT % OF TOTAL COUNT % OF TOTAL IBC % OF RATING CATEGORY Overweight/Buy 1202 36% 302 42% 25% Equal-weight/Hold 1411 42% 326 45% 23% Not-Rated/Hold 78 2% 7 1% 9% Underweight/Sell 682 20% 91 13% 13% TOTAL 3,373 726 Data include common stock and ADRs currently assigned ratings. Investment Banking Clients are companies from whom Morgan Stanley received investment banking compensation in the last 12 months. Analyst Stock Ratings Overweight (O). The stock's total return is expected to exceed the average total return of the analyst's industry (or industry team's) coverage universe, on a risk-adjusted basis, over the next 12-18 months. Equal-weight (E). The stock's total return is expected to be in line with the average total return of the analyst's industry (or industry team's) coverage universe, on a risk-adjusted basis, over the next 12-18 months. Not-Rated (NR). Currently the analyst does not have adequate conviction about the stock's total return relative to the average total return of the analyst's industry (or industry team's) coverage universe, on a risk-adjusted basis, over the next 12-18 months. Underweight (U). The stock's total return is expected to be below the average total return of the analyst's industry (or industry team's) coverage universe, on a risk-adjusted basis, over the next 12-18 months. Unless otherwise specified, the time frame for price targets included in Morgan Stanley Research is 12 to 18 months. Analyst Industry Views Attractive (A): The analyst expects the performance of his or her industry coverage universe over the next 12-18 months to be attractive vs. the relevant broad market benchmark, as indicated below. In-Line (I): The analyst expects the performance of his or her industry coverage universe over the next 12-18 months to be in line with the relevant broad market benchmark, as indicated below. Cautious (C): The analyst views the performance of his or her industry coverage universe over the next 12-18 months with caution vs. the relevant broad market benchmark, as indicated below. Benchmarks for each region are as follows: North America - S&P 500; Latin America - relevant MSCI country index or MSCI Latin America Index; Europe - MSCI Europe; Japan - TOPIX; Asia - relevant MSCI country index or MSCI sub-regional index or MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Index. Stock Price, Price Target and Rating History (See Rating Definitions) 8

Important Disclosures for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC Customers Important disclosures regarding the relationship between the companies that are the subject of Morgan Stanley Research and Morgan Stanley Smith 9

Barney LLC or Morgan Stanley or any of their affiliates, are available on the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management disclosure website at www.morganstanley.com/online/researchdisclosures. For Morgan Stanley specific disclosures, you may refer to www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. Each Morgan Stanley Equity Research report is reviewed and approved on behalf of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. This review and approval is conducted by the same person who reviews the Equity Research report on behalf of Morgan Stanley. This could create a conflict of interest. Other Important Disclosures Morgan Stanley & Co. International PLC and its affiliates have a significant financial interest in the debt securities of Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Biogen Inc, Celgene Corp, Gilead Sciences Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Morgan Stanley produces an equity research product called a "Tactical Idea." Views contained in a "Tactical Idea" on a particular stock may be contrary to the recommendations or views expressed in research on the same stock. This may be the result of differing time horizons, methodologies, market events, or other factors. For all research available on a particular stock, please contact your sales representative or go to Matrix at http://www.morganstanley.com/matrix. Morgan Stanley Research is provided to our clients through our proprietary research portal on Matrix and also distributed electronically by Morgan Stanley to clients. Certain, but not all, Morgan Stanley Research products are also made available to clients through third-party vendors or redistributed to clients through alternate electronic means as a convenience. For access to all available Morgan Stanley Research, please contact your sales representative or go to Matrix at http://www.morganstanley.com/matrix. Any access and/or use of Morgan Stanley Research is subject to Morgan Stanley's Terms of Use (http://www.morganstanley.com/terms.html). By accessing and/or using Morgan Stanley Research, you are indicating that you have read and agree to be bound by our Terms of Use (http://www.morganstanley.com/terms.html). In addition you consent to Morgan Stanley processing your personal data and using cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy and our Global Cookies Policy (http://www.morganstanley.com/privacy_pledge.html), including for the purposes of setting your preferences and to collect readership data so that we can deliver better and more personalized service and products to you. To find out more information about how Morgan Stanley processes personal data, how we use cookies and how to reject cookies see our Privacy Policy and our Global Cookies Policy (http://www.morganstanley.com/privacy_pledge.html). If you do not agree to our Terms of Use and/or if you do not wish to provide your consent to Morgan Stanley processing your personal data or using cookies please do not access our research. Morgan Stanley Research does not provide individually tailored investment advice. Morgan Stanley Research has been prepared without regard to the circumstances and objectives of those who receive it. Morgan Stanley recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial adviser. The appropriateness of an investment or strategy will depend on an investor's circumstances and objectives. The securities, instruments, or strategies discussed in Morgan Stanley Research may not be suitable for all investors, and certain investors may not be eligible to purchase or participate in some or all of them. Morgan Stanley Research is not an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security/instrument or to participate in any particular trading strategy. The value of and income from your investments may vary because of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, default rates, prepayment rates, securities/instruments prices, market indexes, operational or financial conditions of companies or other factors. There may be time limitations on the exercise of options or other rights in securities/instruments transactions. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. If provided, and unless otherwise stated, the closing price on the cover page is that of the primary exchange for the subject company's securities/instruments. The fixed income research analysts, strategists or economists principally responsible for the preparation of Morgan Stanley Research have received compensation based upon various factors, including quality, accuracy and value of research, firm profitability or revenues (which include fixed income trading and capital markets profitability or revenues), client feedback and competitive factors. Fixed Income Research analysts', strategists' or economists' compensation is not linked to investment banking or capital markets transactions performed by Morgan Stanley or the profitability or revenues of particular trading desks. The "Important US Regulatory Disclosures on Subject Companies" section in Morgan Stanley Research lists all companies mentioned where Morgan Stanley owns 1% or more of a class of common equity securities of the companies. For all other companies mentioned in Morgan Stanley Research, Morgan Stanley may have an investment of less than 1% in securities/instruments or derivatives of securities/instruments of companies and may trade them in ways different from those discussed in Morgan Stanley Research. Employees of Morgan Stanley not involved in the preparation of Morgan Stanley Research may have investments in securities/instruments or derivatives of securities/instruments of companies mentioned and may trade them in ways different from those discussed in Morgan Stanley Research. Derivatives may be issued by Morgan Stanley or associated persons. With the exception of information regarding Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley Research is based on public information. Morgan Stanley makes every effort to use reliable, comprehensive information, but we make no representation that it is accurate or complete. We have no obligation to tell you when opinions or information in Morgan Stanley Research change apart from when we intend to discontinue equity research coverage of a subject company. Facts and views presented in Morgan Stanley Research have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other Morgan Stanley business areas, including investment banking personnel. Morgan Stanley Research personnel may participate in company events such as site visits and are generally prohibited from accepting payment by the company of associated expenses unless pre-approved by authorized members of Research management. Morgan Stanley may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations or views in this report. To our readers in Taiwan: Information on securities/instruments that trade in Taiwan is distributed by Morgan Stanley Taiwan Limited ("MSTL"). Such information is for your reference only. The reader should independently evaluate the investment risks and is solely responsible for their investment decisions. Morgan Stanley Research may not be distributed to the public media or quoted or used by the public media without the express written consent of Morgan Stanley. Information on securities/instruments that do not trade in Taiwan is for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as a recommendation or a solicitation to trade in such securities/instruments. MSTL may not execute transactions for clients in these securities/instruments. To our readers in Hong Kong: Information is distributed in Hong Kong by and on behalf of, and is attributable to, Morgan Stanley Asia Limited as part of its regulated activities in Hong Kong. If you have any queries concerning Morgan Stanley Research, please contact our Hong Kong sales representatives. Morgan Stanley is not incorporated under PRC law and the research in relation to this report is conducted outside the PRC. Morgan Stanley Research does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in the PRC. PRC investors shall have the relevant qualifications to invest in such securities and shall be responsible for obtaining all relevant approvals, licenses, verifications and/or registrations from the relevant governmental authorities themselves. Neither this report nor any part of it is intended as, or shall constitute, provision of any consultancy or advisory service of securities investment as defined under PRC law. Such information is provided for your reference only. Morgan Stanley Research is disseminated in Brazil by Morgan Stanley C.T.V.M. S.A.; in Mexico by Morgan Stanley México, Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V which is regulated by Comision Nacional Bancaria y de Valores. Paseo de los Tamarindos 90, Torre 1, Col. Bosques de las Lomas Floor 29, 05120 Mexico City; in Japan by Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities Co., Ltd. and, for Commodities related research reports only, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Japan Co., Ltd; in Hong Kong by Morgan Stanley Asia Limited (which accepts responsibility for its contents) and by Bank Morgan Stanley AG, Hong Kong Branch; in Singapore by Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte. (Registration number 199206298Z) and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Securities Pte Ltd (Registration number 200008434H), regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (which accepts legal responsibility for its contents and should be contacted with respect to any matters arising from, or in connection with, Morgan Stanley Research) and by Bank Morgan Stanley AG, Singapore Branch (Registration number T11FC0207F); in Australia to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act by Morgan Stanley Australia Limited A.B.N. 67 003 734 576, holder of Australian financial services license No. 233742, which accepts responsibility for its contents; in Australia to "wholesale clients" and "retail clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Australia Pty Ltd 10

(A.B.N. 19 009 145 555, holder of Australian financial services license No. 240813, which accepts responsibility for its contents; in Korea by Morgan Stanley & Co International plc, Seoul Branch; in India by Morgan Stanley India Company Private Limited; in Indonesia by PT Morgan Stanley Asia Indonesia; in Canada by Morgan Stanley Canada Limited, which has approved of and takes responsibility for its contents in Canada; in Germany by Morgan Stanley Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main and Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management Limited, Niederlassung Deutschland, regulated by Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); in Spain by Morgan Stanley, S.V., S.A., a Morgan Stanley group company, which is supervised by the Spanish Securities Markets Commission (CNMV) and states that Morgan Stanley Research has been written and distributed in accordance with the rules of conduct applicable to financial research as established under Spanish regulations; in the US by Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, which accepts responsibility for its contents. Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, authorized by the Prudential Regulatory Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulatory Authority, disseminates in the UK research that it has prepared, and approves solely for the purposes of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, research which has been prepared by any of its affiliates. RMB Morgan Stanley (Proprietary) Limited is a member of the JSE Limited and regulated by the Financial Services Board in South Africa. RMB Morgan Stanley (Proprietary) Limited is a joint venture owned equally by Morgan Stanley International Holdings Inc. and RMB Investment Advisory (Proprietary) Limited, which is wholly owned by FirstRand Limited. The information in Morgan Stanley Research is being disseminated by Morgan Stanley Saudi Arabia, regulated by the Capital Market Authority in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and is directed at Sophisticated investors only. The information in Morgan Stanley Research is being communicated by Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc (DIFC Branch), regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (the DFSA), and is directed at Professional Clients only, as defined by the DFSA. The financial products or financial services to which this research relates will only be made available to a customer who we are satisfied meets the regulatory criteria to be a Professional Client. The information in Morgan Stanley Research is being communicated by Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc (QFC Branch), regulated by the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority (the QFCRA), and is directed at business customers and market counterparties only and is not intended for Retail Customers as defined by the QFCRA. As required by the Capital Markets Board of Turkey, investment information, comments and recommendations stated here, are not within the scope of investment advisory activity. Investment advisory service is provided exclusively to persons based on their risk and income preferences by the authorized firms. Comments and recommendations stated here are general in nature. These opinions may not fit to your financial status, risk and return preferences. For this reason, to make an investment decision by relying solely to this information stated here may not bring about outcomes that fit your expectations. The trademarks and service marks contained in Morgan Stanley Research are the property of their respective owners. Third-party data providers make no warranties or representations relating to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the data they provide and shall not have liability for any damages relating to such data. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and S&P. Morgan Stanley Research, or any portion thereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of Morgan Stanley. INDUSTRY COVERAGE: Biotechnology COMPANY (TICKER) RATING (AS OF) PRICE* (05/04/2016) Andrew S Berens Acceleron Pharma Inc (XLRN.O) O (08/13/2015) $27.50 Akebia Therapeutics Inc (AKBA.O) O (09/09/2015) $9.17 Cempra Inc (CEMP.O) O (11/16/2015) $16.10 GW Pharmaceuticals PLC (GWPH.O) O (08/13/2015) $78.54 Incyte Corp (INCY.O) O (03/23/2016) $68.69 Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc (ICPT.O) U (04/08/2016) $139.13 Keryx Biopharmaceuticals Inc (KERX.O) E (10/05/2015) $5.21 Ocular Therapeutix Inc (OCUL.O) O (02/17/2016) $10.64 Relypsa, Inc. (RLYP.O) U (08/13/2015) $14.00 Rockwell Medical Inc (RMTI.O) U (08/13/2015) $7.64 Versartis, Inc. (VSAR.O) E (08/13/2015) $7.41 Matthew Harrison Alexion Pharmaceuticals (ALXN.O) O (10/01/2015) $141.41 Amgen Inc. (AMGN.O) O (12/14/2015) $154.18 BeiGene Ltd (BGNE.O) O (02/29/2016) $26.26 Biogen Inc (BIIB.O) O (03/26/2014) $263.12 Bluebird Bio Inc (BLUE.O) E (12/07/2015) $40.73 Celgene Corp (CELG.O) E (03/26/2014) $100.90 Chimerix Inc (CMRX.O) U (02/22/2016) $5.43 DBV Technologies SA (DBVT.O) O (09/15/2015) $31.89 Editas Medicine (EDIT.O) E (02/29/2016) $30.20 Galapagos NV (GLPG.O) O (06/08/2015) $47.15 Gilead Sciences Inc. (GILD.O) E (10/01/2015) $85.60 Global Blood Therapeutics Inc (GBT.O) O (09/08/2015) $19.98 ImmunoGen Inc. (IMGN.O) U (09/21/2015) $6.17 Infinity Pharmaceuticals Inc (INFI.O) O (09/21/2015) $5.44 Innoviva Inc (INVA.O) U (08/14/2014) $11.61 Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IRWD.O) E (08/14/2014) $10.22 Juno Therapeutics Inc (JUNO.O) E (01/13/2015) $38.30 MacroGenics Inc (MGNX.O) E (02/25/2016) $19.46 Ophthotech Corp (OPHT.O) O (08/14/2014) $41.84 Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc (PTLA.O) O (08/14/2014) $22.26 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (REGN.O) E (10/01/2015) $360.64 Regenxbio Inc (RGNX.O) O (10/12/2015) $10.40 Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc (SNDX.O) O (03/28/2016) $14.04 Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc (RARE.O) E (07/27/2015) $63.09 Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX.O) O (10/01/2015) $80.63 Stock Ratings are subject to change. Please see latest research for each company. * Historical prices are not split adjusted. 2016 Morgan Stanley 11