Presented by: Connie Perkins, PE, CFM April 20, 2016

Similar documents
SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY 19, 2017 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION (WIIN) ACT

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt Resolution No approving SAFCA s Fiscal Year Final Budget.

Community Development Department

DES MOINES CITY OF TWO RIVERS. Flooding Risk & Impact to Development

SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR AUGUST 20, 2015

RESOLUTION - APPROVING FINAL FISCAL YEAR BUDGET

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

Development Fee Program: Comparative risk analysis

Floodplain Management Plan

SUBJECT: LAND USE PLANNING POLICY WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (REPORT #2)

MUNICIPAL LAND USE STRATEGIES for Improving Flood Resilience

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

Justification for Floodplain Regulatory Standards in Illinois

Repetitive Loss Area Revisit # 6 Walter Road Area Jefferson Parish

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

A Review of Our Legacy System, History of Neglect, Current Issues, and the Path Forward for Levee Safety

Flood Hazards and Flood Risk, the Impact of a Changing Climate

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

Comprehensive Flood Management Plan. City of Sacramento Department of Utilities

Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) Program

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction

Flood Risk Management and Nonstructural Flood Risk Adaptive Measures

3D Elevation Program (3DEP) Status and Plans. Kevin T. Gallagher Associate Director, Core Science Systems June 26, 2017

ANNUAL REPORT. on the MITIGATION ACTIONS. in the SACRAMENTO COUNTY LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Dated December 2016 (AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN)

East Hartford. Challenges

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

Flood Risk in the Schuylkill Watershed. Planning for Resilient Communities

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT # FLOOD HAZARDS

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

CITY OF VESTAVIA HILLS

Abstract. An assessment of the benefits of DWR s levee inspection program in California s Central Valley

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Delaware River Basin Commission s Role in Flood Loss Reduction Efforts

Green Stormwater. Flood Risk Reduction. Infrastructure for. June Presented by: Kari Mackenbach, CFM ms consultants Lynn Mayo, PE, CFM AECOM

Technical Memorandum 3.4 E Avenue NW Watershed Drainage Study. Appendix E Floodplain Impacts and Implications Memo

YUNG-HSIN SUN Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE

Thurston County, WA Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan Annual Progress Report CRS Activity 510

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

CRS UNIFORM MINIMUM CREDIT NEW JERSEY

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

Flood Risk Outreach Tools for Georgia Communities. GAFM 10 th Annual Conference Presented By: Jarrett Mattli

REAL ESTATE FLOOD DISCLOSURE PROGRAM & FLOOD MAP INFORMATION SERVICES

Kentucky Division of Water Permitting Floodplain Overview and Considerations

BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

APPENDIX K Drainage Study

SACOG Board of Directors

Flood directive implementation in Finland

CRS State Profile: Wyoming

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

Options for North Wagga

REAL ESTATE FLOOD DISCLOSURE PROGRAM & FLOOD MAP INFORMATION SERVICES

Overview of Capabilities and Current Limitations

History of Floodplain Management in Ascension Parish

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

Date: May 15, Council, Mayor, & City Manager. James Walton PE, CRS Coordinator, Stormwater Utility

Stormwater Utility Fund Delivery of Services

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

Flood Resilience Study Findings

Urban Level of Protection Adequate Progress Report

Chapter 5 Floodplain Management

Adequate Progress Report

SWIF TO THE RESCUE. Patty Robinson Ike Pace, PE WATER NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE ENERGY

APPENDIX E ECONOMICS

CRS State Profile: Alaska

AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 50: FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

Fighting the Flood: Current Political, Regulatory and Financial Challenges

Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District. Zone No. 3 Advisory Board Meeting

Flood: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

What are the savings? An Assessment of the National Flood Insurance Program s (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS)

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana Flood Insurance Study Update Risk Analysis March 3, Shona Gibson Project Monitor, FEMA Region VI

Comprehensive Flood Mitigation for 12,000 Properties

CRS State Profile: Connecticut

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

Presentation Overview

Changes in Criteria and Scoring for CRS Outreach Projects

Increasing Risk Communication for Property Owners with Risk NJAFM Conference Atlantic City, NJ

King County Flood Control District Flood Risk Reduction Work Program and Accomplishments

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

The Breadth of the Planning Portfolio

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

Attachment B. King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

SECTION 9: MAPS AND DATA

National Flood Insurance Program s Community Rating System:

Situation: the need for non-structural flood risk reduction measures

SECTION V THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY BLUEPRINT

Discovery Report. Cache River Watershed, Alexander, Johnson, Pulaski, and Union Counties, Illinois

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Five-Year Floodplain Management Work Plan

FLOODPLAIN INFORMATION SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY DURING

Federal Emergency Management Agency

SHARE OF 10% RETENTION COSTS DWR)

Transcription:

Presented by: Connie Perkins, PE, CFM April 20, 2016

City of Sacramento s Flood History Need for a Comprehensive Flood Management Plan (CFMP) Overview of Sacramento s CFMP 2016 Next Steps

Sacramento has experienced great floods events in 1860, 1911, 1913, 1950, 1955, 1963, 1964, 1986, 1995 and 1997

1956 Record Flood: Though engineers had been predicting it would take a year to fill the nearly completed upstream Folsom Dam, the second record storm filled the dam in a week and Sacramento is saved from flooding. 1964 Record Flood: The 3rd record flood in less than 15 years. Engineers concluded that Folsom Dam was only designed to handle is a 120-yr storm, not a 500-yr storm. 1986 Record Flood: 10 in. of rain in 11 days. Folsom Dam downgraded to about a 60-year storm. Corps determines that a majority of the city does not have 100-year protection.

Proposed Change to State Hazard Mitigation Plans to Address Future Climate Variability Issues (2014) E013690 The Federal Flood Risk Management Standard for federal agencies (2015) Central Valley Flood Protection Plan SB5 (2016) New Development standard 200-year flood ULDC

City s strategic plan to reduce flood risk over the next 5 years. A comprehensive management document that will guide the City s flood risk reduction and mitigation efforts.

LOW RISK HIGH RISK Flood risk reduction is best achieved by employing a suite of risk reduction tools. LAND USE PLANNING FLOOD RISK REDUCTION DEV STANDARDS EMERGENCY PREP LEVEE IMP INTERNAL DRAINAGE RISK COMMUNICATION NFIP/CRS RISK REDUCTION TOOLS

Purpose Historical Perspective Land Use Planning and Development Guidelines Emergency Preparation Levee and Other Structural Improvements Internal Drainage Risk Communication National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)/Community Rating System Program (CRS)

Rescue Zones Evacuation Plans for special needs facilities (schools, hospitals etc.); Identification of refuge and evacuation locations for special needs facilities, new residential developments, large commercial and public buildings Rescue and Evacuation Zones Identification of emergency vehicle access to subdivisions Provision of infrastructure to protect on-site fuel storage.

Rescue Zone: An area of the City that would flood to a depth of 1 foot in 2 hours.

Central Valley Flood Protection Plan (CVFPP) Requirements 200-year flood protection by July 2016 Levee clearance, encroachments, and maintenance requirements New state building code standards for evacuation

1 8

Connecting all emergency response documents Emergency Action Plans separate Response Everbridge System Critical Facilities List Observation & Recording Flooded Areas Recovery Plan Damage Assessment Recovery Ordinance Rescue & Evacuation Maps Based on 200-year flood State requirement Animated levee break scenarios

Major projects(corps, SAFCA, & DWR): American River Common Features Project Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction Project South Sacramento Stream Groups Folsom Dam Modifications/Joint Federal Project Natomas Levee Improvement Project

42 miles total 18 miles completed 24 miles to finish

Levee Accreditation Plan Corps expired the City s certifications 5 to 7 years Levee Modernization Plan 200-year plan

Since 1955, most of the City s flood damage has resulted from drainage deficiencies 1,354 miles of storm drain pipes; 49,914 drain inlets; and 105 pump stations The drainage system is sized based on outdated hydrology and does not have capacity to drain a 100-year storm event Approximately $70 million of the highest priority projects have been completed over the last 11 years, but a backlog of over $500 million in projects remains

City/County Watershed Management Plan (WMP) Reducing the increased flooding from development on watershed-wide basis

Brochure in City s Utility Bill annually Mailing to Repetitive Loss properties State of CA s Flood Risk Notice to 200-yr floodplain properties Billboards, advertisements on buses, community meetings and events High Water Mark Signs

Program For Public Information Flood Response Plan Flood Insurance Coverage Improvement Plan Repetitive Loss Area Analysis Community Rating System (CRS)Credit

Flood insurance 43,000 policies CRS Rating of 5 Equals a 10-25% reduction in flood insurance rates Equals a savings of $1.3 million/yr to the community

Adopt 2016 CFMP May 3, 2016 Initiate annual implementation program Future updates every 5 years

Connie Perkins, PE, CFM Senior Engineer cperkins@cityofsacramento.org 916-808-1914