CFA Society Maine. The 2015 Outlook for Banks Stocks. For required Conflicts Disclosures, please see page 21 GLOBAL I RESEARCH.

Similar documents
VIX to Fall; Stocks to Rise; Small to Outperform

Canadian Equity Strategy

EQUITY RESEARCH. OSFI releases draft of revisions to B-20 mortgage guidelines. For Required Non-U.S. Analyst and Conflicts Disclosures, see page 3.

US Economics. RBC Capital Markets, LLC Jacob Oubina Director, Senior US Economist (212) ; ECONOMICS I RESEARCH

Special Edition Picture of the Week #2: Assessing Exposure to Brexit and Domestic Opportunities 19% 15% 4% 2% OC AWI DOOR MHK MAS WHR

FIRST GLANCE COMMENT. Enbridge Inc. (TSX: ENB; 36.69; NYSE: ENB) Q1/07 Results Generally In Line. Sector Perform Average Risk. Impact Neutral.

The Fertilizer Market - A View from Wall Street Fertilizer Outlook & Technology Conference

Cusi Site Visit: Long Term Upside Tangible

Canadian Strategy: A deeper dive into seasonality Sell in May and hold on a second

The Gretzky Way Where s the puck going?

Market Maps. April 2016 Bob Dickey, Technical Analyst. RBC Capital Markets, LLC / Portfolio Advisory Group U.S. Equities.

EQUITY RESEARCH. International continues to be a bright spot. Outperform TSX: TDG; CAD 2.42 Price Target CAD 3.50

Geopolitical Problems Is it time to call the World Police?

Lines in the Sand. Changing Gears and Catching Up FIC TECHNICAL STRATEGY I RESEARCH

Continuing to make progress at Fruta del Norte

Asset Allocation Guide

Gold. Listless Amid Calmer Macro Environment JULY Mark Allen Nondini Chakrabarti

Trend & Cycle. LARGE-CAP GOLDS: The New BCE/Nortel? Exhibit 1: AMEX GOLD BUGS INDEX (HUI) 150 WEEKS HUI: 518 GOLD: 1060 HUI: 516 GOLD: 1227

RBC Capital Markets Corp. Bill Bonello (Analyst) (612) ; bbonellorbccm

EQUITY RESEARCH. Ramp-ups: What to expect when expecting a new mine

Lines in the Sand. Payroll Pivot Points Warning Signs Abound FIC TECHNICAL STRATEGY I RESEARCH

Consumerism in Health Care Revolutionizing Provider Models

Market Maps. Bob Dickey, Technical Analyst. October 2016

Market Maps. Bob Dickey, Technical Analyst. June 2016

U.S. Equity Strategy Weekly

Canadian dividend sectors: Rising rates, rising opportunities? A special report by the Portfolio Advisory Group

Market Maps. Bob Dickey, Technical Analyst. April 2017

Market Impact of TLAC Requirements. FIG DCM Bank Capital Solutions

RATINGS REVISION COMMENT

U.S. Equity Strategy Weekly

Economic and Market Outlook

Manulife Financial Corp.

Convertibles. To convexity... and beyond! November Key investment themes in 2014 could prove beneficial for convertible bonds.

A special report by the Portfolio Advisory Group

Third Quarter 2017 INVESTOR PRESENTATION. November 2017

Asia Equity Strategy Research Analysts Sakthi Siva

Nasdaq US Large Cap Equities for Rising Rates Index

U.S. Consumer Credit Outlook

2011 FBR Fall Investor Conference. November 29, 2011

Burden of expectations could limit the loonie s flight A special report by the Portfolio Advisory Group

Wells Fargo & Company

Osprey Medical Inc. Struggling to take off

U.S. government shutdown: It s not a game changer

EQUITY RESEARCH. 4Q16 prod: In line capping a solid year. Outperform ASX: SAR; AUD 1.71 Price Target AUD Scenario Analysis*

Sanford C. Bernstein Conference

All you need to know about the Golden Cross

U.S. Corporate Issuers: Lending Surges Amid A Decline In Credit Risk In 1Q17

2Q 30 JUNE 2018 MFS EUROPEAN VALUE EQUITY (USD)

Technical Analysis: Market Insight

EQUITY RESEARCH. No change to outlook after Q3/15 results. Outperform Speculative Risk TSX: IVN; CAD 0.63 Price Target CAD 1.50

Not your father s banks A special report by the Portfolio Advisory Group U.S. Equities. RBC Wealth Management. For important disclosures, see page 8.

Demand for sovereign bonds: The importance of diversity

Commercial Banking Performance 1st Quarter 2017

Global Equity Focus List

Convertible bonds gaining from growth as rates rise

In any event, when you are mostly invested in stocks of companies that tend to grow their dividends

M a y 8, H o t e l N i k k o S a n F r a n c i s c o Aaron J. Axton

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS BANKING AND POLICY STUDIES

Markets catch-up to the Fed. Market Insight

Economic Groundhog Day

Asset Allocation Guide

EQUITY RESEARCH. A profound accounting change is coming but you might not notice it (at first)

Economic and Market Outlook

Coping with the correction

NCLGIAWC Optimizing Investment Portfolios

3Q 30 SEPTEMBER 2018 MFS EUROPEAN EQUITY EX U.K. (USD)

Liquidity, Capital and Financial Outlook Todd Gibbons Chief Financial Officer

The Supervisory Capital Assessment Program: Motivation and Results of the Bank Stress Test

Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.

US Banks Q2 Preview: Results Overshadowed by Deteriorating Outlook; Downgrading BBT

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.

RBC WEALTH MANAGEMENT. Global Insight. Focus Article

Banks Undervalued: Different Lens, Same Conclusion

GS Global ECS Credit Strategy Research. March 31, Alberto Gallo, CFA Goldman, Sachs & Co

Smart Beta Dashboard. Thoughts at a Glance. March By the SPDR Americas Research Team

IXG ishares Global Financials ETF

US Rates Outlook: The Fed s Third Mandate

Investment Research. Deposit Betas Rising but Still Falling Short. Strategy. June 11, 2018

Dollarama Inc. Q4 F2017 Results. A straight-forward beat and other notable business updates HIGHLIGHTS. The NBF Daily Bulletin.

BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK) (the ETF )

Our view: IBM reported Sep-qtr results that were ahead of Street on EPS but below on revenues.

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

Analyst's Notes. Argus Recommendations

Nasdaq US Large Cap Equities for Rising Rates Index

2Q 30 JUNE 2018 MFS GLOBAL EQUITY (AUD)

Q4 Preview & Transfer of Coverage: Growth Potential and Attractive Valuation Supports Strong Buy

Roger Yuan Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C. (+852)

Additional series available. Morningstar TM Rating. Funds in category. Equity style Market cap % Giant 0.0 Large 1.9 Medium 58.5 Small 37.1 Micro 2.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS. April 8, 2014

Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG): Growth and Yield in Oil

EQUITY RESEARCH. $50/bbl (WTI) Stress Test & Valuation Trends. For Required Conflicts Disclosures, see Page 8.

of RBC Dominion Securities Your Money, Well Managed October, 2013 Professional Wealth Management Since 1901

MTA Educational Web Series

MiFID II Research Rules Sellside Perspective

Karur Vysya Bank (KVB) KVB IN; KVB.BO

Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.

2H17 Securities Sector Outlook

AUSTRALIAN SECURITISATION FORUM Australian Market Review and Outlook. Ken Hanton May 2018

CCAR 2019: A Very Tough Test

U.S. Bancorp Fixed Income Investor Presentation

Transcription:

GLOBAL I RESEARCH CFA Society Maine The 2015 Outlook for Banks Stocks March 2, 2015 Corporation Gerard Cassidy (Analyst) (207) 780-1554 gerard.cassidy@rbccm.com Steven Duong (Associate) (207) 780-1554 steven.duong@rbccm.com John Hearn (Associate) (207) 780-1554 john.hearn@rbccm.com This report is priced as of market close February 26, 2015 EST. All values in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. For required Conflicts Disclosures, please see page 21

U.S. Labor Market & Unemployment JOLTS Data / Unemployment Rates 6,000 Quits, Mar-07, 2,985 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 Openings, Apr-07, 4,534 JOLTS Data JOLTS data measures job openings and labor turnover. Key items to focus on are the number of hires, openings, and quits. - 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Hires, Openings, Separations per Month (000s) Layoffs & Discharges Quits Other Separations Recessions Hires Openings Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Data as of Dec-14 Unemployment Rates The U-3 is the official reported unemployment rate, which stood at 5.7% in January. The U-6 unemployment rate includes marginally attached workers and those working part-time for economic reasons. The U-3/U-6 spread measures the level of marginally attached workers and those working part-time for economic reasons. U-3 and U-6 Unemployment Rates (%) 18.0 8.0 16.0 7.0 14.0 6.0 12.0 5.0 10.0 4.0 8.0 3.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 - - Jan-94 May-95 Sep-96 Jan-98 May-99 Sep-00 Jan-02 May-03 Sep-04 Jan-06 May-07 Sep-08 Jan-10 May-11 Sep-12 Jan-14 U-6/U-3 Spread Unemployment Rate (U-3) U-6 Rate Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics U-6/U-3 Spread (%) Employment Outlook Looks Robust 2

U.S. Economy Private Residential Investment as a Percentage of GDP / U.S. Energy Production 8.0 7.0 (%) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1Q'67: 3.48% 2Q'70: 3.87% 1Q'75: 3.78% 3Q'82: 3.22% Historical Average: 4.68% 1Q'91: 3.47% 4Q'14: 3.26% Private Residential Investment as % of GDP Private residential has contributed ~4.70% to GDP on average. The latest reading came in at 3.26%, still below the pre-crisis troughs. 2.0 1947 1951 1955 1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis mmbbl/d 12 U.S. Energy Production U.S. energy production is at the highest levels in almost 30 years, driven by onshore production. U.S. oil production five years ago was less than 5 million barrels a day versus over 8.5 million a day today. Onshore Lower 48 Housing Recovery Still Has Legs but Recent Oil Price Decline Could Slow Energy Production 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 NGLs Offshore 1 Alaska 0 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 3

Loans and Leases of U.S. Commercial Banks 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 Current $7,999.6Billion Peak $7,323 Billion Loans and Leases of U.S. Commercial Banks Current loans and leases of commercial banks are at $8.0 trillion. Growth in commercial real estate and consumer loans is expected accelerate in 2015. 2,000 1,000-1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 ($ Billions) Total Loans & Leases Peak 10/22/08 to 3/24/10: -8.58% FAS 166/167 Trough 3/30/11 to current: 18.51% Other Real Estate C & I Loans Consume Home Equity Source: Federal Reserve board. Shaded areas indicate U.S. recessions. Data as of Feb 11, 2015 *Beginning 2/1/12, dataset includes thrifts that have converted to commercial bank charters. We estimate the impact to total loans to be $50.5 Billion. C&I Loans C&I loans have grown at a 10.5% CAGR since bottoming out in October 2010. The high level of growth has been driven in large part by a rebound in leverage lending. ($ Billions) 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200-8.3% CAGR 7/80-8/90 9.3% CAGR 9/97-1/01-2.8% CAGR 8/90-12/93 14.8% CAGR 5/04-10/08-7.1% CAGR 1/01-5/04 10.5% CAGR 10/10-12/14-14.1% CAGR 10/08-10/10 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Source: Federal Reserve board. Shaded areas indicate U.S. recessions. Data as of Feb 11, 2015 *Beginning 2/1/12, dataset includes thrifts that have converted to commercial bank charters. We estimate the impact to total loans to be $50.5 Billion. Loans Outstanding at All-Time Record High; Loan Growth Expected to Accelerate in 2015 4

Household Debt 110.0% 100.0% 2009Q1: 104.1% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 2014Q3: 79.1% Total Household Debt to Personal Income Total household debt stood at 79.1% in the fourth quarter, down from 104.1% in 1Q09. The deleveraging of the consumer balance sheet appears to be over. 50.0% 99:Q1 99:Q3 00:Q1 00:Q3 01:Q1 01:Q3 02:Q1 02:Q3 03:Q1 03:Q3 04:Q1 04:Q3 05:Q1 05:Q3 06:Q1 06:Q3 07:Q1 07:Q3 08:Q1 08:Q3 09:Q1 09:Q3 10:Q1 10:Q3 11:Q1 11:Q3 12:Q1 12:Q3 13:Q1 13:Q3 14:Q1 14:Q3 Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; U.S. Department of Commerce: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Beginning in 2003Q1, student loans are included in total household loans. 13.5 13.0 13.17% Q4-07 12.5 12.09% Q2-87 Household Debt Service as Percentage of DPI Household debt service to disposable personal income currently stands at 9.92% as compared to 13.17% in 4Q07. Lower interest rates have had a positive impact on consumer debt service. (%) 12.0 11.5 11.0 10.5 10.0 10.39% Q4-93 9.92% Q3-14 9.5 '80 '81 '82 '83 '85 '86 '87 '88 '90 '91 '92 '93 '95 '96 '97 '98 '00 '01 '02 '03 '05 '06 '07 '08 '10 '11 '12 '13 Source: Federal Reserve Board; shaded areas indicate U.S. recession Note: The household debt service burden is an estimate of the ratio of debt payments to disposable personal income. Debt payments consist of the estimated required payments on outstanding mortgage and consumer debt. Data as of Q3 2014. Household Debt Service and Total Debt Levels Remain Well Below Peak Levels 5

Subprime lending Subprime lending New subprime consumer loans increased to $189.3 billion in 2014. Auto loans represent the largest subprime consumer loan category at $129.5 billion of originations. Source: Equifax *Excludes home loans and student loans. Data are through November of each year and not adjusted for inflation. Subprime share of total mortgage originations.subprime mortgage lending remains anemic, however. Subprime mortgage originations have averaged ~$4 billion a year since 2009, down from a peak of $625 billion in 2005. Source: Inside mortgage finance Total mortgage originations include home-equity lending. Subprime Lending Driven by Auto Loans 6

Net interest margin/ Fed Balance Sheet Net Interest Margin (%) 4.50 4.25 4.00 3.75 3.50 3.25 4.29 4.274.22 4.08 4.06 4.08 3.94 3.90 3.83 3.81 3.60 3.62 3.55 3.52 3.39 3.42 3.35 3.253.25 3.253.26 3.21 3.143.133.123.12 Net Interest Margin Net interest margins (NIMs) have contracted to its lowest level in 30 years due to the prolonged low interest rate environment. NIMs are expected to stabilize in 2015 and increase as short-term interest rates rise in 2015. 3.00 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Annual 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 Quarterly Source: FDIC. 5.0 Total Factors Supplying Reserve Funds Assets on the Fed s balance sheet have risen from about $900 billion in 2006 to about $4.5 trillion today As a percentage of nominal GDP, Fed assets have grown from 6% of nominal GDP to about 26% of nominal GDP. The net expansion over this period primarily reflects the Fed s large-scale asset purchase programs. We expect it will take up to 10 years to bring the Fed s balance back to pre-crisis levels. Factors Supplying Reserve Funds ($T) Reserves & Factors Absorbing Reserve Funds ($T) 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 - (0.5) (1.0) (1.5) (2.0) (2.5) (3.0) (3.5) (4.0) (4.5) (5.0) Dec-02 Jun-03 Dec-03 Jun-04 Dec-04 Jun-05 Dec-05 Jun-06 Dec-06 Jun-07 Dec-07 Jun-08 Dec-08 Jun-09 Dec-09 Jun-10 Dec-10 Jun-11 Dec-11 Jun-12 Dec-12 Jun-13 Dec-13 Jun-14 Dec-14 Reserve Balance Other Deposits Other than Reserve Balance Treasury Cash Holdings Repo Currency in Circulation Other Treasury Currency Outstanding Gold Stock & SDR Central Bank Liquidity Swaps Maiden Lane Commercial Paper Funding Facility ABCP/MM Facility Broker/Dealer Facility TALF Direct Bank/AIG Lending Term Auction Credit Repo Agency & Debt Securities MBS US Treasuries Source: Federal Reserve NIMs are Expected to Stabilize in 2015 and Increase as Short-term Interest Rates Rise in 2015. 7

Credit Quality Nonperforming Assets and Net Charge-offs/ Loan Loss Reserves 3.5 6.0 NCO (%) 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 NPA (%) Nonperforming Assets and Net Charge-Offs Nonperforming assets continue to trend lower. Net charge-off rates trend lower as well and are near historical lows. Stronger for longer over next three years. 0.5 1.0-1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Source: FDIC Data as of 4Q14 Shaded areas indicate U.S. recessions NPAs NCOs - Loan Loss Reserves / Total Loans (1948-2013) 3.5% 2010, 3.31% 3.0% 1987, 2.73% Loan Loss Reserves Loan loss reserves peaked to an all-time high in 2010 at 3.31% of total loans and has fallen below the historical average to 1.48% of total loans at 4Q14. Loan loss reserves are expected to continue to trend lower into 2016. Loan Loss Reserves/Total Loans 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% Average LLR/Lns, 1.78% 2006, 1.15% 3Q14, 1.54% 0.5% 1977, 0.92% 0.0% 1948 1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 Source: FDIC Recessions LLR/Lns Average LLR/Lns Credit Recovery Almost Complete and Credit Quality Expected to Remain Strong 8

Credit Quality 14.0 12.0 Delinquency % Total Loans 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 Delinquency Rates Delinquency rates continue to trend lower across all lending categories. Residential real estate delinquency rates remain elevated, however, at 6.63% in the 4Q14. 2.0-1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Source: FRB Data as of 4Q14 Res. RE CRE Total RE Consumer loans C&I loans Percentage of loans in foreclosure by state The rate of loans in foreclosure in judicial states remains elevated relative to the rate of loans in foreclosure in non-judicial states. The higher level of loans in foreclosure in judicial states has contributed to the relatively high delinquency rate of residential real estate. Source: Mortgage Bankers Association of America Delinquency Rates Expected to Continue Downward Trend 9

Energy Loans Large U.S. Banks Even under the worst case scenarios, large banks will be able to absorb losses from their energy exposures, in our view. For the largest banks in the U.S., we do not believe sustained low oil prices ($40-$45 a barrel) will have a material negative impact on them. Energy / Total Loans CRE / Total Loans CRE / Energy BOKF 20.1% 19.2% 95.5% CFR 16.1% 28.0% 174.1% GNBC 14.0% 18.8% 134.5% HBHC 12.0% 22.6% 188.3% ZION 8.0% 25.2% 314.5% CMA 7.0% 0.0% 0.0% PB 5.6% 32.8% 585.3% ASB 4.3% 17.2% 400.4% Source: SNL Financial LC; Energy Exposure Remains Manageable at the Largest U.S. Banks Banks with energy exposure We are concerned if oil prices remain depressed these banks will experience increased credit problems in both their energy and real estate portfolios. 10

Efficiency Ratio Efficiency Ratio Top 20 U.S. Commercial Banks Efficiency Ratio (%) Company Ticker 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 2013Q4 2014Q1 2014Q2 2014Q3 2014Q4 Chart 1 U.S. Bancorp USB 49.6 50.6 51.3 53.7 51.9 50.4 51.3 54.6 2 Capital One Financial Corporation COF 51.7 51.6 53.3 56.1 53.4 53.4 52.0 55.6 3 BB&T Corporation BBT 56.0 57.8 60.5 60.1 59.5 61.4 59.9 57.3 4 M&T Bank Corporation MTB 55.7 50.8 55.8 65.1 63.7 59.2 59.5 58.8 5 Wells Fargo & Company WFC 57.4 56.5 59.2 59.2 59.3 58.1 59.1 59.1 6 Fifth Third Bancorp FITB 61.1 63.5 62.3 64.2 62.9 64.1 59.6 61.1 7 SunTrust Banks, Inc. STI 64.2 65.4 70.6 65.8 66.5 63.5 61.4 61.8 8 KeyCorp KEY 67.0 68.5 66.9 69.0 67.2 67.9 68.1 63.8 9 Huntington Bancshares Incorporated HBAN 62.6 64.2 65.8 61.8 62.6 62.3 61.9 64.1 10 Comerica Incorporated CMA 66.7 64.5 65.3 73.3 65.9 64.5 63.4 64.9 11 PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. PNC 58.8 60.2 61.8 61.7 58.5 59.4 59.8 65.0 12 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. CFG 72.0 71.4 69.8 70.0 70.4 73.4 67.9 66.9 13 Northern Trust Corporation NTRS 72.5 70.5 71.8 73.0 72.5 74.1 70.9 68.6 14 State Street Corporation STT 71.4 67.0 67.7 71.1 77.1 67.3 69.3 69.0 15 JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPM 61.4 63.8 103.0 72.0 63.6 62.8 64.8 69.1 16 Bank of New York Mellon Corporation BK 76.4 71.8 72.2 73.9 73.1 73.7 74.4 72.5 17 Zions Bancorporation ZION 71.5 72.1 67.4 74.7 74.7 75.1 79.0 72.8 18 Bank of America Corporation BAC 69.7 66.2 81.1 81.2 85.9 82.8 70.8 73.5 19 Regions Financial Corporation RF 63.7 66.4 66.3 62.8 63.0 63.2 61.6 75.3 20 Citigroup Inc. C 62.1 60.4 66.5 69.1 60.7 61.3 66.5 82.0 Min 49.6 50.6 51.3 53.7 51.9 50.4 51.3 54.6 Max 76.4 72.1 103.0 81.2 85.9 82.8 79.0 82.0 Median 63.1 64.3 66.4 67.4 63.6 63.3 62.6 64.9 Average 63.6 63.2 66.9 66.9 65.6 64.9 64.1 65.8 Source: SNL Financial LC; Efficiency Ratio Efficiency ratios for the top 20 banks have hovered ~63-66%. Improved expense discipline have been offset by weak revenues and higher regulatory/operating expenses. Growth in revenues in 2015 is expected to help drive the efficiency ratios lower. Efficiency Ratios are Expected to Fall as Revenue Growth Picks-up 11

Basel III Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Ratio and Excess Capital Basel III CET1 Ratio and Excess Capital for Top 15 Banks Based on Latest U.S. GSIB Rules Basel III CET 1 Recent U.S. GSIB rules are more stringent than GSIB rules proposed by the BCBS. For some institutions, it effectively nearly doubles their capital surcharge (i.e. SIFI buffer ) under the BCBS rules. In $M except percentages Fully Phased-In Basel III at 4Q14 Expected B3 B3 CET1 CET1 Ratio Excess / (Shortfall) Company Ticker B3 RWA B3 CET1 Ratio Run-Rate % Amount JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPM 1,625,000 165,000 10.2% 12.0% (1.8%) (30,000) Bank of America Corporation BAC 1,465,633 141,274 9.6% 9.5% 0.1% 2,039 Citigroup Inc. C 1,299,000 136,541 10.5% 11.5% (1.0%) (12,844) Wells Fargo & Company WFC 1,312,800 137,000 10.4% 9.0% 1.4% 18,848 U.S. Bancorp USB 328,508 29,668 9.0% 8.5% 0.5% 1,745 Bank of New York Mellon Corporation BK 162,030 16,529 10.2% 8.5% 1.7% 2,756 PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. PNC 299,360 29,817 10.0% 8.5% 1.5% 4,371 Capital One Financial Corporation 1 COF 237,587 29,534 12.4% 8.5% 3.9% 9,339 State Street Corporation STT 107,829 13,525 12.5% 8.5% 4.0% 4,360 BB&T Corporation BBT 149,316 15,323 10.3% 8.5% 1.8% 2,631 SunTrust Banks, Inc. STI 160,400 15,600 9.7% 8.5% 1.2% 1,966 Fifth Third Bancorp 1 FITB 121,068 11,368 9.4% 8.5% 0.9% 1,077 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. CFG 108,846 13,173 12.1% 8.5% 3.6% 3,921 Regions Financial Corporation RF 101,997 11,315 11.1% 8.5% 2.6% 2,645 Northern Trust Corporation 1 NTRS 62,897 7,813 12.4% 8.5% 3.9% 2,467 1) On a transitional (not fully phased-in) basis. Source: Company reports; Capital Levels for the Industry are at Levels not Seen Since the 1930s 12

Future Profitability Future Return on Average Assets / Return on Average Common Equity 1.35% 1.30% 1.25% 1.20% 1.15% 1.10% 1.30% 0.03% 0.04% 0.08% 0.04% 0.02% 0.03% Future Return on Average Assets Return on average assets have been impacted primarily from new legislation and regulation. We do not expect ROAs to return pre-crisis levels. 0.03% 1.05% 0.00% 1.02% 1.00% Source: SNL Financial, LC;. 16% 15% 15.54% 0.36% 0.48% 0.94% Future Return on Average Common Equity Return on average common equity have been impacted by new regulatory capital requirements. We do not expect ROEs to return to pre-crisis levels. 14% 13% 12% 11% 10% 9% 0.50% 0.25% 0.38% 0.38% 2.04% 10.21% Source: SNL Financial, LC;. The Pre-Crisis Profitability Levels are Not Expected to Return 13

Future Profitability and Valuations Future Profitability and Valuations Lower profitability will drive lower valuations. L-T Valuations Should Benefit from Lower Stock Betas Average 1997-2006 4Q14 2015E - 2016E Return on Average Assets 1.30% 0.89% 1.00% - 1.10% Return on Average Common Equity 15.54% 8.40% 10.00% - 12.00% Price to Book Value (x) 2.37 1.20 1.25-1.50 Price to Tangible Book Value (x) 3.02 1.59 1.50-2.00 Price to Forward Earnings (x) 15.5 13.0 10.0-11.0 Relative Price to Earnings 76% 78% 60% - 70% Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio 1 8.29% 11.00% 8.00% - 10.00% Tier 1 Capital Ratio 9.49% 12.40% 10.00% - 12.00% Source: SNL Financial LC, Factset. Estimates are estimates. 1) Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio averages not available for 1997-2002. Average for period 2003-2006 used as approximation. Note: Averages are based on median values of each period, and top 50 banks are the top 50 in assets publicly traded commercial banks for each respective period. Lower Valuation Levels Are Likely in Near Term; Lower Betas Could Lead to Higher L-T Valuations 14

S&P500 Banks Price/Earnings Performance 19.0x 17.0x 15.0x 13.0x 11.0x 9.0x July 1987 - September 1987 data off chart March 2009 - March 2010 data off chart +1σ, 14.1 μ, 10.4 S&P Bank Index Absolute P/E Forward 12-Month Earnings S&P 500 banks have approached their historical mean price/earnings ratio. Stocks look fairly values on this measure. On a normalized earnings basis this ratio would be below long term average, in our opinion. 7.0x -1σ, 6.8 5.0x 3.0x 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 S&P 500 Bank Index relative to S&P 500 Index Relative to the S&P 500, S&P banks remain below the historical price/book value ratio. Price/book value suggest the stocks look undervalued. 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% +2σ, 85.7% +1σ, 74.8% μ, 63.9% -1σ, 53.0% 40.0% -2σ, 42.1% 30.0% 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Source: SNL Financial, LC;. We View S&P 500 Bank Stocks Valuation as Attractive at Current Levels 15

Future Profitability and Valuations Top 20 Bank Price to Book and ROACE Relationship Price to Book and ROACE Relationship Generally, a company s valuation will be based on its return on common equity and its level of risk. Companies that can not deliver an ROACE above its cost of capital will need to radically change. 250.0 Price/ Book (%) 200.0 150.0 100.0 y = 12.329x + 7.4653 R² = 0.6473 CFG ZION BAC CMA BK STI RF C KEY PNC COF MTB NTRS STT BBT FITB JPM HBAN WFC USB 50.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 Source: SNL Financial, LC;. ROACE (%) A Consistently Higher ROACE Leads to a Higher Stock Valuation 16

Merger and Acquisition Activity and Pricing Seller's Assets ($ Billions) 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200-210% increase from 1990 to 1994 36 1990 169 291 1991 274 357 451 143 170 183 1992 1993 1994 524 486 1995 385 289 1,211 435 442 451 475 1996 1997 1998 287 1999 334 569 2000 Seller's Assets in Billions 237 117 318 145 431 369 1,313 253 262621 268 267 296 283 251 2001 2002 209 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 143 109 176 145 46 2009 Number of Deals Announced 216 223 287 165 194 137 111 147 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 37 19-2015 YTD 600 500 400 300 200 100 Number of Deals M&A Activity The number of deals generally have increased from the low in 2009. The majority of the deals are done with targets of less than $1 billion in assets. Increased deal activity is expected in 2015 as deal prices rise to higher levels. Source: SNL Financial LC Data as of February 26, 2015 35.0X 30.0X In 2008, 4 of the top 5 deals were done at less than 35% of book value. 275 255 235 215 M&A Pricing Deal prices troughed in 2011 and have risen since. We do not expect deal pricing to come back to levels witnessed in the 1993-2008 period. Higher deal pricing is largely driven by the acquirer s stock valuation. 25.0X 20.0X 15.0X 10.0X 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD 195 175 155 135 115 95 75 (%) Median P/LTM Earnings (left) Median P/BV (right) Source: SNL Financial, LC;. Merger and Acquisition Activity is Expected to Pick-up as Deal Pricing Increases 17

Interest Rate Tightening Periods Federal Funds Intended Rate vs. 10 Year Yield The Fed Funds rate has been at historical lows, while the 10-year treasury continues to be impacted by macro-geopolitical events. Historically, the 10-year treasury yield rises or falls before the Fed Funds rate. 10 yr Gov't Bond 2 Fed Funds Target 1 Lowest Yield at FF Rate @ Time of Date of Duration of Date of Yield FFunds Increase Duration of 1st FF Rate Increase FF Rate FF Rate Lowest Yield (%) (%) bps Δ Increase (%) Increase Increases Oct-93 5.33 5.97 64 4 months 3.00 Feb-94 12 months Dec-98 4.65 5.90 125 6 months 4.75 Jun-99 11 months Jun-03 3.33 4.73 140 12 months 1.00 Jun-04 24 months Jul-12 1.38 NA NA NA 0-0.25 NA NA (%) 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0-5.33 4.65 3.33 1.38 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Fed Funds Target 10 year Source: Federal Reserve. 1 Target rate denotes the rate at which Fed concludes period of monetary easing. The Fed stopped lowering rates on September 1992 at 3.00% and maintained this level for 17 months. 2 The lowest yield in the 10 year government bond represents the minimum recorded yield from the time the Fed concluded a period of monetary easing to when rates were eventually raised. When the intended fed funds rate was lowered to 3.00% in September 1992, the 10 year reached its minimum yield of 5.33% in October 1993 and had increased to 5.97% by the time rates were increased 4 months later. The Federal Funds Rate is Likely to Rise in 2015 but Will the 10-Year Treasury Rate Increase 18

30 day Federal Funds Futures implied rate vs S&P Regional Banking ETF 0.90% 44.00 0.80% 42.00 0.70% 30 day Federal Funds Futures implied rate 0.60% 0.50% 0.40% 0.30% 40.00 38.00 36.00 SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF 0.20% 0.10% 34.00 0.00% Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 32.00 Fed Funds Dec 2015 SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF Source: Bloomberg; FactSet Bank Stock Performance is Correlated with Fed Funds Expectations in Near-term 19

Federal Reserve Actions and Bank Stock Performance Bank Stock Performance Bank stock performance tends to be the strongest going into the first Fed Funds rate increase. Following a number of Fed Fund rate increases bank stock performance weakens. BIX 320.0 300.0 280.0 260.0 10 Yr Oct-93 Bottoms at 5.33% First Fed Funds Rate Increase Feb-94 to 3.25% Date Increase Decrease Level (%) 2/1/1995 50... 6.00 11/15/1994 75... 5.50 8/16/1994 50... 4.75 5/17/1994 50... 4.25 4/18/1994 25... 3.75 3/22/1994 25... 3.50 2/4/1994 25... 3.25 Last Fed Funds Rate Increase Feb-95 6.00% 37.0 35.0 33.0 31.0 29.0 BKX 240.0 27.0 220.0 10 Yr Nov-94 Peaks at 8.05% 200.0 May-93 Jul-93 Sep-93 Nov-93 Jan-94 Mar-94 May-94 Jul-94 Sep-94 Nov-94 Jan-95 Mar-95 May-95 Jul-95 25.0 23.0 Source: SNL Financial, LC; FactSet; Federal Reserve; BIX BKX At This Point in the Cycle, the Best Time to Own Bank Stocks is Six Months Prior to First Fed Funds Increase 20

Required Disclosures Conflicts Disclosures This product constitutes a compendium report (covers six or more subject companies). As such, chooses to provide specific disclosures for the subject companies by reference. To access current disclosures for the subject companies, clients should refer to https://www.rbccm.com/gldisclosure/publicweb/disclosurelookup.aspx?entityid=1 or send a request to RBC CM Research Publishing, P.O. Box 50, 200 Bay Street, Royal Bank Plaza, 29th Floor, South Tower, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2W7. Please note that current conflicts disclosures may differ from those as of the publication date on, and as set forth in, this report. Please note that current conflicts disclosures may differ from those as of the publication date on, and as set forth in, this report. The analyst(s) responsible for preparing this research report received compensation that is based upon various factors, including total revenues of the member companies of and its affiliates, a portion of which are or have been generated by investment banking activities of the member companies of and its affiliates. Distribution of Ratings For the purpose of ratings distributions, regulatory rules require member firms to assign ratings to one of three rating categories - Buy, Hold/Neutral, or Sell - regardless of a firm's own rating categories. Although ' ratings of Top Pick/Outperform, Sector Perform and Underperform most closely correspond to Buy, Hold/Neutral and Sell, respectively, the meanings are not the same because our ratings are determined on a relative basis (as described above). Distribution of ratings, Equity Research As of 31-Dec-2014 Investment Banking Serv./Past 12 Mos. Rating Count Percent Count Percent BUY [Top Pick & Outperform] 897 52.92 290 32.33 HOLD [Sector Perform] 686 40.47 137 19.97 SELL [Underperform] 112 6.61 6 5.36

Required Disclosures Conflicts Policy Policy for Managing Conflicts of Interest in Relation to Investment Research is available from us on request. To access our current policy, clients should refer to https://www.rbccm.com/global/file-414164.pdf or send a request to RBC CM Research Publishing, P.O. Box 50, 200 Bay Street, Royal Bank Plaza, 29th Floor, South Tower, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2W7. We reserve the right to amend or supplement this policy at any time. Dissemination of Research and Short-term Trade Ideas endeavors to make all reasonable efforts to provide research simultaneously to all eligible clients, having regard to local time zones in overseas jurisdictions. ' equity research is posted to our proprietary website to ensure eligible clients receive coverage initiations and changes in ratings, targets and opinions in a timely manner. Additional distribution may be done by the sales personnel via email, fax, or other electronic means, or regular mail. Clients may also receive our research via third party vendors. also provides eligible clients with access to SPARC on the Firm s proprietary INSIGHT website, via email and via third-party vendors. SPARC contains market color and commentary regarding subject companies on which the Firm currently provides equity research coverage. Research Analysts may, from time to time, include short-term trade ideas in research reports and / or in SPARC. A short-term trade idea offers a short-term view on how a security may trade, based on market and trading events, and the resulting trading opportunity that may be available. A short-term trade idea may differ from the price targets and recommendations in our published research reports reflecting the research analyst's views of the longer-term (one year) prospects of the subject company, as a result of the differing time horizons, methodologies and/or other factors. Thus, it is possible that a subject company's common equity that is considered a long-term 'Sector Perform' or even an 'Underperform' might present a short-term buying opportunity as a result of temporary selling pressure in the market; conversely, a subject company's common equity rated a long-term 'Outperform' could be considered susceptible to a short-term downward price correction. Short-term trade ideas are not ratings, nor are they part of any ratings system, and the firm generally does not intend, nor undertakes any obligation, to maintain or update short-term trade ideas. Short-term trade ideas may not be suitable for all investors and have not been tailored to individual investor circumstances and objectives, and investors should make their own independent decisions regarding any securities or strategies discussed herein. Please contact your investment advisor or institutional salesperson for more information regarding ' research. Analyst Certification All of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect the personal views of the responsible analyst(s) about any and all of the subject securities or issuers. No part of the compensation of the responsible analyst(s) named herein is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed by the responsible analyst(s) in this report. The Global Industry Classification Standard ( GICS ) was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. ( MSCI ) and Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC ( S&P ) and is licensed for use by RBC. Neither MSCI, S&P, nor any other party involved in making or compiling the GICS or any GICS classifications makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such standard or classification (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any of such standard or classification. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, S&P, any of their affiliates or any third party involved in making or compiling the GICS or any GICS classifications have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of the possibility of such damages.

Disclaimer is the business name used by certain branches and subsidiaries of the Royal Bank of Canada, including RBC Dominion Securities Inc.,, LLC, RBC Europe Limited, (Hong Kong) Limited, Royal Bank of Canada, Hong Kong Branch and Royal Bank of Canada, Sydney Branch. The information contained in this report has been compiled by from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Royal Bank of Canada,, its affiliates or any other person as to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report constitute ' judgement as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice. This material is prepared for general circulation to clients and has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. research analyst compensation is based in part on the overall profitability of, which includes profits attributable to investment banking revenues. Every province in Canada, state in the U.S., and most countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, the securities discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. may be restricted from publishing research reports, from time to time, due to regulatory restrictions and/ or internal compliance policies. If this is the case, the latest published research reports available to clients may not reflect recent material changes in the applicable industry and/or applicable subject companies. research reports are current only as of the date set forth on the research reports. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. To the full extent permitted by law neither RBC Capital Markets nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of. Additional information is available on request. To U.S. Residents: This publication has been approved by, LLC (member FINRA, NYSE, SIPC), which is a U.S. registered broker-dealer and which accepts responsibility for this report and its dissemination in the United States. Any U.S. recipient of this report that is not a registered broker-dealer or a bank acting in a broker or dealer capacity and that wishes further information regarding, or to effect any transaction in, any of the securities discussed in this report, should contact and place orders with, LLC. To Canadian Residents: This publication has been approved by RBC Dominion Securities Inc.(member IIROC). Any Canadian recipient of this report that is not a Designated Institution in Ontario, an Accredited Investor in British Columbia or Alberta or a Sophisticated Purchaser in Quebec (or similar permitted purchaser in any other province) and that wishes further information regarding, or to effect any transaction in, any of the securities discussed in this report should contact and place orders with RBC Dominion Securities Inc., which, without in any way limiting the foregoing, accepts responsibility for this report and its dissemination in Canada. To U.K. Residents: This publication has been approved by RBC Europe Limited ('RBCEL') which is authorized by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority ('FCA') and the Prudential Regulation Authority, in connection with its distribution in the United Kingdom. This material is not for general distribution in the United Kingdom to retail clients, as defined under the rules of the FCA. However, targeted distribution may be made to selected retail clients of RBC and its affiliates. RBCEL accepts responsibility for this report and its dissemination in the United Kingdom. To Persons Receiving This Advice in Australia: This material has been distributed in Australia by Royal Bank of Canada - Sydney Branch (ABN 86 076 940 880, AFSL No. 246521). This material has been prepared for general circulation and does not take into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any recipient. Accordingly, any recipient should, before acting on this material, consider the appropriateness of this material having regard to their objectives, financial situation and needs. If this material relates to the acquisition or possible acquisition of a particular financial product, a recipient in Australia should obtain any relevant disclosure document prepared in respect of that product and consider that document before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. This research report is not for retail investors as defined in section 761G of the Corporations Act. To Hong Kong Residents: This publication is distributed in Hong Kong by (Hong Kong) Limited and Royal Bank of Canada, Hong Kong Branch (both entities which are regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority ( HKMA ) and the Securities and Futures Commission ('SFC')). Financial Services provided to Australia: Financial services may be provided in Australia in accordance with applicable law. Financial services provided by the Royal Bank of Canada, Hong Kong Branch are provided pursuant to the Royal Bank of Canada's Australian Financial Services Licence ('AFSL') (No. 246521). (Hong Kong) Limited is exempt from the requirement to hold an AFSL under the Corporations Act 2001 in respect of the provision of such financial services. (Hong Kong) Limited is regulated by the HKMA and the SFC under the laws of Hong Kong, which differ from Australian laws. To Singapore Residents: This publication is distributed in Singapore by the Royal Bank of Canada, Singapore Branch, a registered entity granted offshore bank licence by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. This material has been prepared for general circulation and does not take into account the objectives, financial situation, or needs of any recipient. You are advised to seek independent advice from a financial adviser before purchasing any product. If you do not obtain independent advice, you should consider whether the product is suitable for you. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. If you have any questions related to this publication, please contact the Royal Bank of Canada, Singapore Branch. Royal Bank of Canada, Singapore Branch accepts responsibility for this report and its dissemination in Singapore. To Japanese Residents: Unless otherwise exempted by Japanese law, this publication is distributed in Japan by or through (Japan) Ltd., a registered type one financial instruments firm and/or Royal Bank of Canada, Tokyo Branch, a licensed foreign bank. Registered trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. is a trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under license. Copyright, LLC 2015 - Member SIPC Copyright RBC Dominion Securities Inc. 2015 - Member CIPF Copyright RBC Europe Limited 2015 Copyright Royal Bank of Canada 2015 All rights reserved