Oranges and Grapefruit Grown in the Lower Rio Grande Valley. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

Similar documents
Oranges and Grapefruit Grown in Lower Rio Grande Valley in. SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a recommendation

Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Decreased Assessment Rate. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Increased Assessment Rate. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

Olives Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

Irish Potatoes Grown in Colorado; Increased Assessment Rate. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

Kiwifruit Grown California; Decreased Assessment Rate. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a

Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Increased Assessment Rate. established for the Florida Tomato Committee (Committee)

Grapes Grown in Designated Area of Southeastern California; established for the California Desert Grape Administrative

Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Pummelos Grown in. Florida; Change in Size Requirements for Oranges

Oranges and Grapefruit Grown in Lower Rio Grande Valley in. Texas; Relaxation of Container and Pack Requirements

Pistachios Grown in California, Arizona, and New. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

Almonds Grown in California; Adjusted Kernel Weight. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a

[Docket No. AMS-SC ; SC FIR] Pistachios Grown in California, Arizona, and New Mexico; AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

Cranberries Grown in States of Massachusetts, et al.; Free. and Restricted Percentages for the Crop Year for

Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Decreased Assessment Rate. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.

Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines and Pummelos Grown in. Florida and Imported Grapefruit; Change of Size. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

Cranberries Grown in States of Massachusetts, et al.; Establishment of Seasonal Volume Regulation

Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Change. SUMMARY: This proposal invites comments on changing the

7 CFR Parts 900, 1150, 1160, 1205, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1209, 1210, 1212, 1214, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1219, 1220, 1221, 1222,

Onions Other Than Bermuda-Granex-Grano/Creole; Bermuda-Granex-Grano

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Labor.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) proposes to amend its

Regulation A: Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks. AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Regulation A: Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks. AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Direct Investment Surveys: BE-12, Benchmark Survey of Foreign Direct Investment in the

Billing Code DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. 24 CFR Parts 5, 891, 960, and 982. [Docket No. FR 5743-I-04] RIN 2577-AJ36

Regulation A: Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks. AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. SUMMARY: The Board is amending Regulation D, Reserve Requirements of

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board).

Cattle Fever Tick; Importation Requirements for Ruminants From Mexico

New Equipment Contract, RUS Contract Form 395 for Telecommunications and

Regulation D: Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions. AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Express Bridge Loan Pilot Program; Modification of Fee Policy. ACTION: Notification of change to Express Bridge Loan Pilot Program and impact on

Billing Code P

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ( Board )

DOWNLOAD PDF INCREASE LICENSE FEES UNDER PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES ACT OF 1930.

Regulation D: Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions. AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations.

Annual Adjustment of Civil Monetary Penalties to Reflect Inflation

User Fees Relating to the Registered Tax Return Preparer Competency Examination

Training, Qualification, and Oversight for Safety-Related Railroad Employees

SUMMARY: The Department of State (hereinafter, State or the Department )

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. 24 CFR Part 207. [Docket No. FR-5583-P-01] RIN 2502-AJ16

Unsuccessful Work Attempts and Expedited Reinstatement Eligibility. SUMMARY: These rules finalize the rules we proposed in our notice of proposed

Removal of Regulations on Advance Payments for Goods and Long-Term Contracts. SUMMARY: This notice of proposed rulemaking proposes to streamline IRS

SUMMARY: This rule finalizes the interim final rule (IFR) that was published on May

User Fees Relating to Enrolled Agents and Enrolled Retirement Plan Agents. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.

SUMMARY: This final rule establishes requirements and procedures for the Federal

Summary 11/1/2018 4:21:57 PM. Differences exist between documents. Old Document: Orig-reg pages (118 KB) 11/1/2018 4:21:53 PM

Guarantee Fee Rates for Guaranteed Loans for Fiscal Year 2018; Maximum Portion of Guarantee Authority Available for Fiscal Year 2018;

Premium Review Process; Request for Comments Regarding Section. Section 1003 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) is amending Regulation

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. 24 CFR Parts 200 and 232. [Docket No. FR-5632-F-02] RIN 2502-AJ27

[Billing Code P]

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Eligibility, Certification, and

Announcement of Loan Refinancing Procedures, and Deadlines for the Refinancing of

Onshore Oil and Gas Operations Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustments

SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that would modify the

340B Drug Pricing Program Ceiling Price and Manufacturer Civil Monetary Penalties. AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.

[Billing Code P] SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is amending its regulations to adjust

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( Act ), 1 and Rule

ACTION: Notification announcing the maximum allowable fixed interest rates.

Medical Loss Ratio Rebate Requirements for Non-Federal Governmental Plans

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. 24 CFR Parts 5, 891, 960, and 982. [Docket No. FR 5743-I-04] RIN 2577-AJ36

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is

Billing Code DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. 5 CFR Part [Docket No. FR-5722-F-01] RIN 2501-AD61

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. 5 CFR Part 179 RIN 3206-AM89. Administrative Wage Garnishment

Amendments to Existing Validated End-User Authorization in the People s Republic of

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( Act or Exchange

SUMMARY: This rule amends the licensing policy for Cuba and portions of three license

SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as required by

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is announcing. the 2017 rates it will charge for voluntary grading, inspection,

SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is prescribing this final

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD. AGENCY: Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. SUMMARY: This rule deletes regulatory language that

Imposition of Special Measure against Banca Privada d Andorra as a Financial Institution of Primary Money Laundering Concern

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of Labor. SUMMARY: This document announces the Occupational Safety and Health

Updating Section 301 Regulations To Reflect Statutory Changes. SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations under section 301 of the

Sixty-Month Period of Employment Requirement for Government Pension Offset Exemption

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( Act ), 1 and Rule

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. 19 CFR Parts 12 and 127 [USCBP ] RIN 1515-AE13

Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Public Disclosure Requirements; Extension of. Compliance Period for Certain Companies to Meet the Liquidity Coverage Ratio

Ownership and Control of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. [Docket No. FR-5683-N-58] 30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection:

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request;

Implementation of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012; Establishment of a

[Docket ID FEMA ; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-8515] AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( Act ) 1 and

Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS); TRICARE

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. [Docket No. FR-6078-N-01]

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services. Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate

United States Patent and Trademark Office. ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request. SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; Amendment to the Bank Secrecy Act Regulations Reports of Foreign Financial Accounts

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 12 CFR Part 208 Regulation H; Docket No. R-1064

Miscellaneous Federal Home Loan Bank Operations and Authorities Financing. SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is adopting a final rule

AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of Labor. SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (the Department), in accordance with

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is issuing this final rule to make

Transcription:

This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/04/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-25737, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 906 [Doc. No. AMS-SC-17-0037; SC17-906-1 PR] Oranges and Grapefruit Grown in the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas; Decreased Assessment Rate AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a recommendation from the Texas Valley Citrus Committee (Committee) to decrease the assessment rate established for the 2017-18 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.09 to $0.02 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent of oranges and grapefruit handled under the Marketing Order (Order). The assessment rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated. This proposed rule also makes administrative revisions to the subpart headings to bring the language into conformance with the Office of Federal Register requirements. DATES: Comments must be received by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposed rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement

Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or internet: http://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet at the address provided above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Jamieson, Marketing Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Director, Southeast Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax: (863) 291-8614, or E-mail: Doris.Jamieson@ams.usda.gov or Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing 2

Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposal is issued under Marketing Agreement and Order No. 906, as amended (7 CFR part 906), regulating the handling of oranges and grapefruit grown in the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas. Part 906, (hereinafter referred to as the "Order"), is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the "Act." The Committee locally administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of oranges and grapefruit operating within the production area. The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. Additionally, because this proposal does not meet 3

the definition of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of January 30, 2017, titled Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs (February 2, 2017). This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under the Marketing Order now in effect, Texas orange and grapefruit handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the Order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate will be applicable to all assessable oranges and grapefruit beginning on August 1, 2017, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would 4

rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. This proposed rule would decrease the assessment rate for the 2017-18 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.09 to $0.02 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent of oranges and grapefruit handled. The Texas orange and grapefruit Marketing Order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of Texas oranges and grapefruit. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with the costs of goods and services in their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input. 5

For the 2016-17 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other information available to USDA. The Committee met on August 8, 2017, and unanimously recommended 2017-18 expenditures of $152,920 and an assessment rate of $0.02 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent of oranges and grapefruit. In comparison, last year's budgeted expenditures were $751,148. The assessment rate of $0.02 is $0.07 lower than the rate currently in effect. The Committee recommended decreasing the assessment rate to reflect that they would not be funding the Mexican fruit fly control program, reducing their budget by more than $595,000. The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2017-18 year include $79,220 for management, $50,000 for compliance, and $23,700 for operating expenses. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2016-17 were $77,200, $50,000, and $23,700, respectively. The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by considering anticipated expenses, expected 6

shipments of 7.5 million 7/10-bushel cartons, and the amount of funds available in the authorized reserve. Income derived from handler assessments calculated at $150,000 (7.5 million x $0.02), along with interest income and funds from the Committee's authorized reserve, would be adequate to cover budgeted expenses of $152,920. Funds in the reserve (currently $282,572) would be kept within the maximum permitted by the Order (approximately one fiscal period s expenses as stated in 906.35). The assessment rate recommended in this proposed rule would continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other available information. Although this assessment rate would be effective for an indefinite period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate Committee recommendations and other 7

available information to determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2017-18 budget and those for subsequent fiscal periods will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA. This proposed rule also makes administrative revisions to the subpart headings of the regulations. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. There are approximately 170 producers of oranges and grapefruit in the production area and 13 handlers subject to regulation under the Marketing Order. Small 8

agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201). According to Committee data, the average price for Texas citrus during the 2015-16 season was approximately $17.48 per box and total shipments were 7.5 million boxes. Using the average price and shipment information, the number of handlers (13), and assuming a normal distribution, the majority of handlers would have average annual receipts of greater than $7,500,000. Thus, the majority of Texas citrus handlers may be classified as large business entities. In addition, based on information from the National Agricultural Statistics Service, the weighted grower price for Texas citrus during the 2015-16 season was approximately $14.64 per box. Using the weighted average price and shipment information, and assuming a normal distribution, the majority of producers would have annual receipts of less than $750,000. Thus, the majority of Texas citrus producers may be classified as small business entities. 9

This proposal would decrease the assessment rate collected from handlers for the 2017-18 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.09 to $0.02 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent of Texas citrus. The Committee unanimously recommended 2017-18 expenditures of $152,920 and an assessment rate of $0.02 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent handled. The assessment rate of $0.02 is $0.07 lower than the 2016-17 rate. The quantity of assessable oranges and grapefruit for the 2017-18 fiscal period is estimated at 7.5 million 7/10-bushel cartons. Thus, the $0.02 rate should provide $150,000 in assessment income (7.5 million x $0.02). Income derived from handler assessments, along with interest income and funds from the Committee s authorized reserve (currently $282,572), would be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2017-18 year include $79,220 for management, $50,000 for compliance, and $23,700 for operating expenses. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2016-17 were $77,200, $50,000, and $23,700, respectively. The Committee recommended decreasing the assessment rate to reflect that it would not be funding the Mexican 10

fruit fly control program, reducing its budget by more than $595,000. Prior to arriving at this budget and assessment rate, the Committee considered information from various sources, such as the Committee s Budget and Personnel Committee, and the Research Committee. Alternative expenditure levels were discussed by these committees who reviewed the relative value of various activities to the Texas citrus industry. These committees determined that all program activities were adequately funded and essential to the functionality of the Order, thus no alternate expenditure levels were deemed appropriate. Additionally, alternate assessment rates of $0.01 and $0.015 per 7/10 bushel-carton were discussed. However, it was determined that these lower assessment rates would draw too heavily from reserves, roughly $78,000 and $43,000, respectively. The proposed rate of $0.02 per 7/10 bushel-carton would draw an anticipated $2,800 from reserves, thereby leaving reserves intact for future needs. Based on these discussions and estimated shipments, the recommended assessment rate of $0.02 would provide $150,000 in assessment income. The Committee determined that assessment revenue, along with funds from reserves and 11

interest income, would be adequate to cover budgeted expenses for the 2017-18 fiscal period. A review of historical information and preliminary information pertaining to the upcoming fiscal period indicates that the average grower price for the 2017-18 season should be approximately $15.50 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent of oranges and grapefruit. Therefore, the estimated assessment revenue for the 2017-18 crop year as a percentage of total grower revenue would be about 0.1 percent. This proposed rule would decrease the assessment obligation imposed on handlers. Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to producers. However, decreasing the assessment rate reduces the burden on handlers and may also reduce the burden on producers. The Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the Texas citrus industry. All interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the August 8, 2017, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested 12

persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small businesses. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Order s information collection requirements have been previously approved by the OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0189, Fruit Crops. No changes in those requirements would be necessary as a result of this proposed rule. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval. This proposed rule would not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Texas orange and grapefruit handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule. 13

A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/rulesregulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed appropriate since the fiscal period began August 1, 2017, and the Order requires that the rate of assessment apply to all assessable oranges and grapefruit handled during such fiscal period. All written comments timely received will be considered before a final determination is made on this rule. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 906 Grapefruit, Marketing agreements, Oranges, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 906 is amended as follows: PART 906 ORANGES AND GRAPEFRUIT GROWN IN LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY IN TEXAS 14

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 906 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674. [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart A] 2. Redesignate Subpart - Order Regulating Handling as Subpart A - Order Regulating Handling. [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B and Amended] 3. Redesignate Subpart - Rules and Regulations as Subpart B and revise heading to read as follows: Subpart B -- Administrative Requirements 4. Section 906.235 is revised to read as follows: 906.235 Assessment rate. On and after August 1, 2017, an assessment rate of $0.02 per 7/10-bushel carton or equivalent is established for oranges and grapefruit grown in the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas. [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart C] 5. Redesignate Subpart - Container and Pack Requirements as Subpart C Container and Pack Requirements. Dated: November 22, 2017 Bruce Summers, Acting Administrator, 15

Agricultural Marketing Service. BILLING CODE 3410-02 P [FR Doc. 2017-25737 Filed: 12/1/2017 8:45 am; Publication Date: 12/4/2017] 16