Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Similar documents
Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Shaker Heights City Schools

Loveland City Schools

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Berea City School District

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Paint Valley Local School District

Clear Fork Valley LSD

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Paint Valley Local School District

HUDSON CITY SCHOOLS FINANCIAL REPORT. October 2014 Five-Year Forecast Update KATHRYN L. SINES TREASURER / CFO.

Springboro Community City School District

Springboro Community City School District

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS. For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2014 through 2018

Summary of Significant Forecast Assumptions Amanda-Clearcreek Local School District July 1, 2017 June 30, 2022 October 2017.

Cash Balance June 30 15,940,136 15,271,647 13,479,243 12,241,640 11,698,295 10,837,831 9,756,394 8,379,673

Forecast Provided By Newark City School District Treasurer's Office Julio Valladares, MBA, Treasurer/CFO

Brunswick City School District Five Year Financial Forecast Fiscal Year 2017 to Fiscal Year 2021 (Including Historical Data)

Miami County, Ohio FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS. For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2013 through 2017

LANCASTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - - FAIRFIELD COUNTY IRN:

Loveland City School District

NORTHRIDGE LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT - LICKING COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED ACTUAL

Brunswick City School District Five Year Financial Forecast Fiscal Year 2017 to Fiscal Year 2021 (Including Historical Data)

MOHAWK LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Wyandot COUNTY, OHIO IRN #050740

Miami County, Ohio FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS. For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2012 through 2016

LAKEWOOD CITY SCHOOLS

Hilliard City School District

Forecast Provided By Fairborn City School District Treasurer's Office Nicole Marshall, Treasurer/CFO

EASTWOOD LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

MARYSVILLE EXEMPTED VILLAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT- UNION COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED

BIG WALNUT LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT- DELAWARE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,

7.020 Cash Balance June 30 3,709,735 4,692,492 5,469, % 5,455,806 5,183,533 4,810,736 4,205,146 3,345,106

WORTHINGTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT-FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,

XENIA COMMUNITY CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT-GREENE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE

Forecast Provided By Dublin City School District Treasurer's Office Mr. Brian Kern, Treasurer/CFO. December 10, 2018 (revised)

Enclosure C-1-c. May 9, 2016

HUBER HEIGHTS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE

Bellefontaine City School District. Fiscal Year Five Year Forecast

Forecast Provided By Dublin City School District Treasurer's Office Mr. Brian Kern, Treasurer/CFO

Findlay City School District Hancock County Five Year Forecast for Fiscal Years 2016 through 2023

Summary of Significant Forecast Assumptions and Accounting Policies For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2018 through 2022

Miami Trace Local School District Fayette County Actual Forecasted Revenues Other Financing Sources Expenditures Other Financing Uses

Tipp City Exempted Village Schools. Miami County

DUBLIN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - FRANKLIN COUNTY

Licking Heights Local School District 5 Year Forecast Assumptions (FY 2013 FY 2017) Board Approved: October 24, Revenue:

Financial Readiness for Leaders

TECUMSEH LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT IRN # FIVE-YEAR FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS OCTOBER

CARLISLE LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT WARREN COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS. Independent Accountants Report Management s Discussion and Analysis...

UPPER SCIOTO VALLEY LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT-HARDIN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED

Harrison Hills City School District Treasurer's Office Roxane Harding, Treasurer

Northwest Local School District (Hamilton County) 5-Year Forecast Assumptions May 11, 2015

Change

Marietta City School District Assumptions for October year Forecast

Summary of Significant Forecast Assumptions and Accounting Policies For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2013 through 2017

MILFORD EXEMPTED VILLAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2014 FIVE-YEAR FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS

Copley-Fairlawn City Schools, Summit County Five Year Forecast Assumptions October, 2011

LAKOTA LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT-BUTLER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013,

LICKING HEIGHTS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT LICKING COUNTY, OHIO

Cloverleaf Local School District Five-Year Financial Forecast

Forecast Provided By Groveport-Madison School District Treasurer's Office John Walsh, Treasurer

LAKOTA LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT-BUTLER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014,

The Notes To The Five Year Forecast Are An Integral Part Of This Presentation.

Forecast Provided By Trotwood-Madison City School District Treasurer's Office Janice Allen, Treasurer

Public School Finance 101

Mansfield City School District Richland County, Ohio

Copley-Fairlawn City Schools, Summit County Five Year Forecast Assumptions May, 2011

CINCINNATI CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT-HAMILTON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,

The property tax is the predominant method communities use to raise additional revenues in Ohio. The property tax comes in two forms:

Ferndale School District #502 Business and Support Services Budget Summary Citizens' Budget General Fund

Piqua City School District 719 East Ash Street Piqua, Ohio ASSUMPTIONS TO THE FIVE-YEAR FORECAST May 2018

LAKOTA LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT-BUTLER COUNTY SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013,

CUYAHOGA HEIGHTS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CUYAHOGA COUNTY REGULAR AUDIT

Loveland City Schools FY Revenue

Northwest Local School District (Hamilton County) 5-Year Forecast Assumptions May 27, 2011

Financial Readiness for Board Members

Five Year Plan Assumptions For Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2016 Through 2020

Financial Readiness for Board Members

Piqua City School District 719 East Ash Street Piqua, Ohio ASSUMPTIONS TO THE FIVE-YEAR FORECAST October 2013

Popular Annual Financial Report

Riverside Local School District

CAROL F. CORBETT, TREASURER

CAROL CORBETT, TREASURER

WEST IRON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT. Financial Report with Supplemental Information Prepared in Accordance with GASB 34.

Cleveland Municipal School District

Management Report. for. Independent School District No. 281 Robbinsdale, Minnesota June 30, 2006

Transcription:

May, 2018 TEAYS VALLEY LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY Five Year Forecast Financial Report 1

Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Executive Summary 3 PAGE # Revenue Overview 4 1.010 General Property Tax (Real Estate) 5 1.020 Public Utility Personal Property 6 1.030 Income Tax 7 1.035 Unrestricted Grants in Aid 8 1.040 & 1.045 Restricted Grants in Aid 9 1.050 Property Tax Allocation 10 1.060 All Other Operating Revenues 11 2.070 Total Other Financing Sources 12 Expenditures Overview 13 3.010 Personnel Services 14 3.020 Employee Benefits 15 3.030 Purchased Services 16 3.040 Supplies and Materials 17 3.050 Capital Outlay 18 3.060 4.060 Intergovernmental & Debt 19 4.300 Other Objects 20 5.040 Total Other Financing Uses 21 Forecast Compare 22 Five Year Forecast 23 Cash Balance Projections & Benchmarks 24 Forecast Changes: 3 Year View 25 Enrollment Supplement 26 Forecast Purpose/Objectives Ohio Department of Education's purposes/objectives for the five year forecast are: 1. 2. 3. To engage the local board of education and the community in the long range planning and discussions of financial issues facing the school district. To serve as a basis for determining the school district's ability to sign the certificate required by O.R.C. 5705.412, commonly known as the "412 certificate." To provide a method for the Department of Education and Auditor of State to identify school districts with potential financial problems. 2

Executive Summary May, 2018 Five Year Forecast Simplified Statement Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beginning Balance 18,277,744 21,924,603 20,997,561 20,394,966 20,290,586 + Revenue 40,697,718 40,600,684 41,891,600 43,082,930 44,381,708 + Proposed Renew/Replacement Levies + Proposed New Levies Expenditures (37,050,858) (41,527,726) (42,494,195) (43,187,310) (45,182,725) = Revenue Surplus or Deficit 3,646,860 (927,042) (602,595) (104,380) (801,017) Ending Balance 21,924,603 20,997,561 20,394,966 20,290,586 19,489,569 Revenue Surplus or Deficit w/o Levies 3,646,860 (927,042) (602,595) (104,380) (801,017) Ending Balance w/o Levies 21,924,603 20,997,561 20,394,966 20,290,586 19,489,569 Summary: During the spring of 2016, the District concluded work on a collaborative bargaining agreement which covers FY2017 FY2019. The new agreement is expected to help continue the District s financial stability. Elements of the agreement included adjustments to the District s health insurance program that enabled affordable base wage increases for employees. A new State funding system has also leveraged the district's local revenue sources since the new formula supplies additional revenue per pupil. Since Teays Valley's funding is not limited by any formula caps or guarantees, additional students translate to additional revenue (of course up to cap limitations). Spending is expected to exceed revenue by the end of FY2019 eroding some of the cash balance reserve, however, the projected deficits are manageable. An updated capital spending plan has been established that requires General Fund support to fully implement. However, this spending plan can be scaled back if finances deteriorate between now and the start of a given capital project. $50,000,000 $45,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 Revenue vs. Expenditures $41,527,726 $42,494,195 $43,187,310 $45,182,725 $37,050,858 $40,697,718 $40,600,684 $41,891,600 $43,082,930 $44,381,708 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Revenue Renew/Replacement Levies New Levies Expenditures 3

Revenue Overview Prev. 5 Year PROJECTED 5 Year Avg. Annual Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Avg. Annual Change 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Change Revenue: 1.010 Real Estate 3.32% 6.38% 2.53% 3.28% 2.31% 2.24% 2.34% 1.020 Public Utility 1.75% 1.79% 1.20% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 0.48% 1.030 Income Tax 19.95% 6.70% 2.30% 2.30% 2.30% 2.30% 3.18% 1.035 State Funding 4.30% 5.72% 0.51% 3.97% 3.63% 3.97% 3.56% 1.040 Restricted Aid 10.52% 23.13% 10.14% 0.00% 0.45% 0.36% 2.76% 1.045 Restr Federal SFSF 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.050 Property Tax Alloc 2.72% 3.16% 3.72% 1.74% 2.39% 2.40% 2.68% 1.060 All Other Operating 11.34% 20.90% 3.15% 1.55% 1.67% 1.67% 4.53% 1.070 Total Revenue 5.19% 6.65% 0.06% 3.18% 2.85% 3.02% 3.13% 2.070 Total Other Sources 186.60% 300.44% 80.27% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 44.03% 2.080 Total Rev & Other Srcs 5.20% 6.82% 0.24% 3.18% 2.84% 3.01% 3.12% State funding (including property tax allocation) and tax related revenue account for approximately 95% of the District s total operational revenue. These revenue sources (state and local tax revenue) are expected to maintain steady growth through the forecasted period. Overall, revenue is expected to average a 3.12% annual growth rate. Public Utility 2.8% 2017 2017 2022 Real Estate 21.3% 20.4% Public Utility 2.8% 2.3% Income Tax Income Tax 17.6% 17.6% 17.7% State Funding 51.1% 52.2% Prop Tax Allo 2.9% 2.8% Real Estate All Othr Op Re 4.2% State 4.5% 21.3% Othr Sources 0.1% Funding 51.1% Public Utility 2.3% Real Estate 20.4% Income Tax 17.7% 2022 State Funding 52.2% Othr Sources 0.1% All Othr Op Rev 4.2% Prop Tax Alloc 2.9% Othr Sources All Othr Op Rev 4.5% Prop Tax Alloc 2.8% 4

1.010 General Property Tax (Real Estate) Revenue collected from taxes levied by a school district by the assessed valuation of real property using effective tax rates for class I (residential/agricultural) and class II (business). FY 2017 Real Estate as a % Projected General Property RevRenewal Tax (Real Levy Estate) Revenue Actual and Projected of Total Revenue $10,000,000 2013 $7,107,921 $1 FY 2017 Rea 2014 $7,457,265 $8,000,000 0.21263034 2015 $7,754,060 $6,000,000 2016 $7,883,638 21.3% 2017 $8,100,905 $4,000,000 2018 $8,617,845 2019 $8,399,805 $2,000,000 2020 $8,675,622 2021 $8,875,800 2022 2013 $9,074,413 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Projected Revenue Renewal Levy Revenue $7,107,921 $7,457,265 $7,754,060 $7,883,638 $8,100,905 $8,617,845 $8,399,805 $8,675,622 $8,875,800 $9,074,413 In the graphic below, nearly all the 2014 real property valuation increase was related to higher agricultural property values determined during the 2014 Pickaway County valuation update. After two straight reappraisal cycles (2011 & 2014) of stalled residential property values, residential property resumed growth in the latest 2017 reappraisal. However, due to recent changes in the formulas to calculate agricultural land value (CAUV), agricultural property values fell in the 2017 reappraisal. As a result, the loss in agricultural property value offset approximately 1/3 of the inflationary growth realized from residential property. Nevertheless, overall real estate values still increased during the reassessment. In addition, the forecast anticipates new residential property to grow by approximately 2 % per year which is nearing pre 2008 recessionary levels. As a result of the forecasted valuation growth, tax collections are expected to exhibit slow but steady growth as well. Gross collections in Tax Year 2017 (Calendar 2018 103.1% rate), appear a bit higher than typical due to the receipt of delinquent commercial taxes accumulated the prior year. The forecast anticipates future gross tax collections will remain very consistent at a near 100% rate. See graphic below. 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% Year over Year Revenue Trend Year over Actual 5 YeProjected 5 Year Average 2013 3.29% 3.32% 2014 4.91% 3.32% 2015 3.98% 3.32% 2016 1.67% 3.32% 3.32% 2017 2.76% 3.32% 2018 6.38% 2.34% 2019 2.53% 2.34% 2020 3.28% 2.34% 2021 2.31% 2.34% 2022 2.24% 2.34% 2.34% Year over Year Revenue Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average *Projected % trends include renewal levies 5

1.020 Public Utility Personal Property Revenue generated from public utility personal property valuations multiplied by the district's full voted tax rate. FY 2017 Public Utility as a Projected Tangible RevRenewal Personal Property Levy Tax Revenue Actual and Projected FY 2017 % Pub of Total Revenue $1,400,000 2013 $1,285,395 $1,285,395 $1,200,000 2014 $1,144,164 $1,144,164 2015 $1,122,446 $1,122,446 $1,000,000 2016 $1,077,695 $1,077,695 2.8% $800,000 2017 $1,066,845 $1,066,845 $600,000 2018 $1,085,921 $1,085,921 $400,000 2019 $1,072,860 $1,072,860 2020 $1,062,131 $1,062,131 $200,000 2021 $1,051,510 $1,051,510 2022 $1,040,995 $1,040,995 Projected Revenue Renewal Levy Revenue $1,285,395 $1,144,164 $1,122,446 $1,077,695 $1,066,845 $1,085,921 $1,072,860 $1,062,131 $1,051,510 $1,040,995 Public Utility tax duplicate values for Teays Valley increased significantly with the addition of the REX natural gas pipeline in 2010 (for pay in 2011). PUPP collections reached a high point in FY2013, after REX and the ODT reached agreement on a pipeline value of approximately $29 million for Teays Valley. Since that time collections have slowly declined in conjunction with typical depreciation on existing values in this classification of property. Although a second pipeline (the ATEX pipeline) was laid in the District, it did not generate additional value nor revenue. That was due to the fact the material transported through that line is exempt from taxes. Therefore, the forecast assumes current PUPP values will continue to gradually decline due to depreciation. Obviously, we will continue to monitor activity here because investments to improve existing assets could offset a drop in overall value. Also it is important to note, our local legislators, as well as other legislators from around the state now have a heightened awareness of the pipeline taxation issue and are working to introduce legislation to address inconsistencies in tax policy related to the materials passed through public utility pipelines. Teays Valley will remain an active participant in any policy change discussions. Year over Year Revenue Trend 15.0% 1 5.0% 5.0% 1 1.75% Year over Actual 5 YeProjected 5 Year Average 2013 9.11% 1.75% 2014 10.99% 1.75% 2015 1.90% 1.75% 2016 3.99% 1.75% 2017 1.01% 1.75% 2018 1.79% 0.48% 2019 1.20% 0.48% 2020 1.00% 0.48% 2021 1.00% 0.48% 2022 1.00% 0.48% 0.48% 15.0% Year over Year Revenue Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average *Projected % trends include renewal levies 6

1.030 Income Tax Revenue collected from income tax earmarked specifically to support schools with a voter approved tax by residents of the school district; separate from federal, state and municipal income taxes. FY 2017 Income Tax as a % Projected RevRenewal Income Tax Actual Levy and Revenue Projected FY 2017 of Inco Total Revenue 0 $10,000,000 2013 3,296,230 $8,000,000 2014 5,631,076 2015 6,348,266 $6,000,000 2016 6,345,830 2017 6,706,959 17.6% $4,000,000 2018 7,156,504 2019 7,321,314 $2,000,000 2020 7,489,831 2021 7,662,140 2022 2013 7,838,326 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Projected Revenue Renewal Levy Revenue $3,296,230 $5,631,076 $6,348,266 $6,345,830 $6,706,959 $ $7,156,504 $ $7,321,314 $ $7,489,831 $ $7,662,140 $ $7,838,326 Clearly, the above graph illustrates the impact of the 1.5% replacement earned income tax passed in 2012. The issue replaced a continuing 0.75% traditional income tax levy. FY15 represents full collection of the new 1.5% tax. Since 2012, collections have more than doubled despite the fact the tax now only applies to "earned" income. This demonstrates the income strong growth that has occurred within the District since 2012. Annual growth is forecasted to continue at rates between 2% and 3% per year (FY2019 FY2022). 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 Year over Year Revenue Trend Year over Actual 5 YeProjected 5 Year Average 2013 10.51% 19.95% 2014 70.83% 19.95% 2015 12.74% 19.95% 2016 0.04% 19.95% 2017 5.69% 19.95% 2018 6.70% 3.18% 2019 2.30% 3.18% 2020 2.30% 3.18% 19.95% 2021 2.30% 3.18% 2022 2.30% 3.18% 3.18% Year over Year Revenue Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average *Projected % trends include renewal levies 7

1.035 Unrestricted Grants in Aid Funds received through the State Foundation Program with no restriction. FY 2017 Unres State Aid as a % of Total Revenue FY 2017 Unr 0 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 Unrestricted Grants in Aid Actual and Projected 50.3% $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $15,886,684 $16,509,406 $17,790,935 $18,533,192 $19,150,718 $20,246,195 $20,349,640 $21,157,212 $21,924,281 $22,795,520 The state retained the basic framework of the school funding formula in its current budget covering FY2018 & FY2019. However, the per pupil funding increases were limited to only $10 per pupil (or 0.167%) each year of the biennial. These levels are significantly lower than increases included in the prior two budgets. The formula calculates the funding it sends to schools by multiplying the per pupil funding amount (FY2018 = $6,010) times the district s enrollment multiplied by a district s individual state share percentage. The state share percentage is a determined by the district s relative wealth per pupil compared to other districts. Teays Valley s state share percentage has remained consistent at near 52%. The formula also contains additional targeted components that help a district like Teays Valley. For example, additional funds are directed to districts with large agricultural tax bases as well as districts that have lower population density. It is also important to note, the new state budget caps the maximum increase growing districts like ours (see Page 26 Enrollment Supplement) can receive at 5.5% and 6.0% respectively for FY2018 and 2019 (most districts are capped at a 3% level for these two years). Additionally, the formula guarantees each district receive no less than it did in FY2017, as long as enrollment did not drop more than 5% from FY2014 to FY2016. Given this framework, Teays Valley expects to receive nearly all of its full calculated formula funding (assuming a 4% cap limit) each year of the forecast. 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% Year over Year Revenue Trend Year over YeaActual 5 Year Projected 5 Year Average 2013 2% 4% 2014 4% 4% 2015 8% 4% 2016 4% 4% 2017 3% 4% 2018 6% 4% 2019 1% 4% 2020 4% 4% 2021 4.30% 4% 4% 2022 4% 4% 4% Year over Year Revenue Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 8

1.040 & 1.045 Restricted Grants in Aid Funds received through the State Foundation Program or other allocations that are restricted for specific purposes. FY 2017 Rest State Aid as a % of Total Revenue FY 2017 Res 0 0.9% $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Restricted Grants in Aid Actual and Projected $249,352 $443,740 $402,876 $398,203 $333,355 $410,463 $368,853 $368,853 $370,520 $371,841 Projected funding in this category is comprised of career tech funding, catastrophic aid reimbursement (associated with high cost special needs students) and economic disadvantaged funding. Sources receipted here are restricted in use to only their intended purpose. Combined these revenue sources are projected to supply approximately $365,000 to $370,000 of revenue annually. 10 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 10 Year over Year Revenue Trend 2.76% 5.36% Year over Year Revenue Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 9

1.050 Property Tax Allocation Includes funds received for Tangible Personal Property Tax Reimbursement, Electric Deregulation, Homestead and Rollback. FY 2017 Prop Tax Property Tax Allocation Actual and Projected Projected RevRenewal Levy Revenue Allocation as a % of Total $1,400,000 FY 2017 Pro 0 2013 $972,836 Revenue $1,200,000 2014 $992,967 $1,000,000 2015 $1,044,048 2016 $1,089,437 2.9% $800,000 2017 $1,100,601 $600,000 2018 $1,135,331 $400,000 2019 $1,177,536 $200,000 $972,836 $992,967 $1,044,048 $1,089,437 $1,100,601 2020 $1,198,032 2021 $1,226,605 2013 2022 2014$1,255,993 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Projected Revenue Renewal Levy Revenue $1,135,331 $1,177,536 $1,198,032 $1,226,605 $1,255,993 The state provides property tax reimbursements to qualifying Class I (residential and agricultural) property owners. All Class I taxpayers in Teays Valley are provided a 10% rollback on their taxes which is picked up by the State. An additional 2.5% tax incentive or rollback is provided to owner occupied dwellings and certain other tax payers qualify for an additional Homestead credit from the State. Since property valuations are expected to steadily rise through the forecasted period, state paid property tax reimbursements are also expected to trend upward. It is noteworthy, agricultural property valuation increases fueled overall collection growth in this category in the past. However, beginning with the 2017 reappraisal, agricultural property values are expected to decline. Therefore, future growth is primarily attributable to residential property increases and associated rollbacks which are expected to more than offset the declining agricultural component. Year over Year Revenue Trend 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 2.72% Year over Actual 5 YeProjected 5 Year Average 2013 1.03% 2.72% 2014 2.07% 2.72% 2015 5.14% 2.72% 2016 4.35% 2.72% 2017 1.02% 2.72% 2018 3.16% 2.68% 2019 3.72% 2.68% 2020 1.74% 2.68% 2021 2.39% 2.68% 2022 2.40% 2.68% 2.68% Year over Year Revenue Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average *Projected % trends include renewal levies 10

1.060 All Other Operating Revenues Operating revenue sources not included in other lines; examples include tuition, fees, earnings on investments, rentals, and donations. FY 2017 Other Operating Revenue as a % of Total FY 2017 Oth 0 Revenue $2,500,000 $2,000,000 All Other Operating Revenue Actual and Projected 4.2% $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $1,234,698 $1,175,353 $1,413,391 $1,735,369 $1,616,376 $1,954,243 $1,892,676 $1,921,918 $1,954,074 $1,986,619 Revenue dipped slightly in 2014 because of the reduction in the District's pay to participate fees. Revenue would have exhibited a larger decrease if it were not for two Medicaid reimbursements totaling $147,000 received during that particular year. The District received another $150,000 in reimbursement in FY2015 and two more Medicaid reimbursements in FY2016 totaling $263,000. In FY2017, the District only received one Medicaid reimbursement totaling $108,911, and explains the dip in revenue from the inflated FY2016 levels which included the doubled payments. Absent the timing of the estimated Medicaid reimbursements this category would reflect a slow but steady growth pattern. Base collections in FY2108 and beyond anticipate a 2% inflationary increase and a pick up in interest earnings. 3 Year over Year Revenue Trend 25.0% 2 15.0% 1 5.0% 11.34% 4.53% 5.0% 1 Year over Year Revenue Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 11

2.070 Total Other Financing Sources Includes proceeds from sale of notes, state emergency loans and advancements, operating transfers in, and all other financing sources like sale and loss of assets, and refund of prior year expenditures. FY 2017 Other Financing Sources as a % of Total FY 2017 Oth Revenue 0.1% $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 Other Operating Financing Sources Actual and Projected $40,000 $20,000 $9,823 $90,066 $106,676 $57,158 $22,779 $91,216 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 Both FY2014 and FY2015 were impacted by two consecutive refunds received from the Bureau of Workers' Compensation. Each refund totaled slightly more than $80,000. FY2016 includes $32,681 of advance returns. FY2018 includes another $71,294 Workers Compensation refund. Future years anticipate a nominal amount of activity related to non operating issues. 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 10 20 Year over Year Revenue Trend 44.03% 186.60% Year over Year Expenditure Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 12

Expenditures Overview Prev. 5 Year PROJECTED 5 Year Avg. Annual Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Avg. Annual Change 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Change Expenditures: 3.010 Salaries 2.45% 7.42% 6.04% 3.81% 3.92% 3.87% 5.01% 3.020 Benefits 1.79% 9.89% 16.46% 7.06% 7.18% 7.16% 9.55% 3.030 Purchased Services 8.82% 0.92% 4.56% 3.30% 3.34% 3.34% 2.72% 3.040 Supplies & Materials 8.65% 4.03% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 1.59% 3.050 Capital Outlay 8.91% 112.68% 84.94% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5.55% 3.060 Intergov n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.010 4.060 Debt n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.300 Other Objects 12.47% 2.63% 1.15% 5.74% 5.29% 7.06% 2.26% 4.500 Total Expenditures 2.77% 7.19% 6.17% 4.45% 4.45% 4.57% 5.36% 5.040 Total Other Uses 1770.16% n/a 14612.12% 35.49% 79.59% 12.39% 3627.36% 5.050 Total Exp & Other Uses 2.76% 7.23% 12.08% 2.33% 1.63% 4.62% 5.58% Overall expenditures are projected to increase, on average, at a rate of 5.58% per year. Salary and Benefit spending is anticipated to increase in conjunction with additional staff aimed at improving instructional services. Each expenditure note goes into further detail about the year over year change. Spending also reflects the goals and objectives approved in the District's latest capital spending plan. Any funding shortfalls necessary to fulfill the approved capital spending plan are covered by General Fund dollars (the District s Permanent Improvement Fund or Maintenance Set Aside Fund are used first). Previously, supplemental contributions required of the General Fund were reflected as expenditures from the Capital Outlay category. Beginning in FY2019, any supplements to bridge shortfall s in capital spending will be recorded as transfers and reflected on Line 5.040 Total Other Uses line item of the forecast instead of direct expenses reflected in Line 3.050 Capital Outlay. Regardless of the accounting change, it is important to keep in mind transfers planned to support the capital spending plan can be scaled back if finances deteriorate between now and the start of a given capital project. Othr Uses Othr Objects Intergov 1.2% & Debt Capital Outlay 0.9% 2017 2017 2022 Salaries 60.2% 58.7% Benefits 19.8% 23.8% Purch Serv Salaries 14.2% 12.4% Supp & 60.2% Mat 3.7% 3.1% Capital Outlay 0.9% 0.2% Intergov & Deb Othr Objects 1.2% Benefits 1.0% Othr Uses 19.8% 0.7% Purch Serv 14.2% Supp & Mat 3.7% Othr Uses 0.7% Othr Objects Intergo 1.0% v & Debt 00% Capital Outlay 0.2% Salaries 58.7% Purch Serv 12.4% Supp & Mat 3.1% 2022 Benefits 23.8% 13

3.010 Personnel Services Employee salaries and wages, including extended time, severance pay, supplemental contracts, etc. FY 2017 Salaries as a % of Total Expenditures FY 2017 Sala 0 60.2% $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 Personnel Services Actual and Projected $17,752,295 $17,885,556 $18,712,511 $19,523,134 $20,795,813 $22,338,812 $23,688,929 $24,590,526 $25,554,595 $26,543,543 The Board and TVCTA ratified an agreement to increase base wages in FY2017 FY2019 (base salaries were increased 2.5% in FY2017, 2.0% in FY2018, and are scheduled to increase another 2.0% in FY2019). The District returned salaries of seven technology and maintenance staff to the General Fund in FY2016. These positions had previously been funded by Permanent Improvement dollars. The District added five teaching staff, one additional guidance position, two additional bus drivers and an additional ½ custodial position in FY2017. Six more teachers, an additional secondary special education administrator and bus driver were added in FY2018 and another five teaching positions and a bus driver are planned in FY2019. Future years assume two additional teaching staff per year to address student to teacher ratios. The additional teaching staff are a direct result of growing enrollment, replacing positions lost during recent the economic crisis, and last but certainly not least the desire to improve instruction and overall educational program offered students. 8.0% Year over Year Expenditure Trend 6.0% 5.01% 4.0% 2.0% 2.45% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% Year over Year Expenditure Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 14

3.020 Employees' Benefits Retirement for all employees, Workers Compensation, early retirement incentives, Medicare, unemployment, pickup on pickup, and all health related insurances. FY 2017 Benefits as a % of Total Expenditures FY 2017 Ben 0 19.8% $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 Employees' Benefits/Insurance Benefits Actual and Projected $6,500,870 $6,399,874 $6,574,024 $6,891,140 $6,829,629 $7,504,756 $8,739,903 $9,357,048 $10,029,021 $10,746,950 Effective January 1, 2014, the District implemented a high deductible health insurance program combined with a health savings account (HSA) for employees. Changes to the health insurance plan have had a tremendously positive impact on the District s overall budget. Since implementing the plan, the District has enjoyed stable insurance premiums and maintained healthy reserves. Beginning in FY2018, premiums increased by more typical trends, although the increases were applied to greatly reduced base levels. The forecast assumes future premiums will increase at industry wide trends, but the District s insurance consortium continues to look for new opportunities to promote health and wellness and provide incentives to help mitigate those trend increases. Beginning in January 2017 and ending June 2018 (impacting half of FY17 and full year of FY18), the forecast reflects Board share HSA contributions to be funded out of the accumulated District reserves. The forecast assumes Board share HSA contributions will return to the General Fund in FY2019. 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 1 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 2.0% 4.0% Year over Year Expenditure Trend 9.55% 1.79% Year over Year Expenditure Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 15

3.030 Purchased Services Amounts paid for personal services rendered by personnel who are not on the payroll of the school district, and other services which the school district may purchase. FY 2017 Purchased Services as a % of Total FY 2017 Pur Expenditures 0 14.2% $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 Purchased Services Actual and Projected $3,320,146 $4,697,234 $4,860,104 $4,804,312 $4,913,841 $4,868,510 $5,090,548 $5,258,516 $5,434,022 $5,615,402 Beginning in FY2014, the District changed the way it accounts for Pickaway Educational Service Center expenses explaining the increase noted in the above graph from FY2013. Previously, these expenses appeared in the All Other Expenditure category. Since these costs are related to the delivery of instructional services (many of which include special education services), the classification changes more accurately represent their intended purpose. This category also accounts for a variety of other expenses including: special education tuition, utilities, transportation charges, rentals, as well as outgoing student enrollment charges. Typical inflationary trends are applied to the base year of FY2018 to produce future estimates. 45.0% 4 35.0% 3 25.0% 2 15.0% 1 5.0% 5.0% Year over Year Expenditure Trend 2.72% 8.82% Year over Year Expenditure Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 16

3.040 Supplies & Materials Expenditures for general supplies, instructional materials including textbooks and media material, bus fuel and tires, and all other maintenance supplies. FY 2017 Supplies & Materials as a % of Total FY 2017 Sup Expenditures 0 3.7% $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 Supplies & Materials Actual and Projected $960,302 $967,548 $1,020,600 $1,111,495 $1,278,307 $1,226,826 $1,263,631 $1,301,540 $1,340,586 $1,380,804 FY2017 includes the impact of providing additional resources to building and departmental budget allocations. Supply spending in FY2018 is expected to end below FY2017 levels. FY2019 spending and beyond incorporate a 3% inflationary trend estimate utilizing FY2018 as the base. 2 Year over Year Expenditure Trend 15.0% 1 5.0% 8.65% 1.59% 5.0% Year over Year Expenditure Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 17

3.050 Capital Outlay This line includes expenditures for items having at least a five year life expectancy, such as land, buildings, improvements of grounds, equipment, computers/technology, furnishings, and buses. FY 2017 Capital Outlay as a % of Total Expenditures FY 2017 Cap 0 0.9% $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 Capital Outlay Actual and Projected $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $265,820 $260,925 $312,225 $664,052 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 The Board approved a resolution in August of 2007 to allocate a portion of the District s inside mills to Permanent Improvements beginning in Calendar year 2008. In December 2014, the Board approved a Capital Spending plan, which was much more comprehensive than anything previously in place. The plan is revisited annually and addresses not only bus and facility needs, but also educational, safety and technology purchases within the District. Since the plan requires more funds than the Permanent Improvement Fund supplies on an annual basis, a portion of capital spending was returned to the General Fund beginning in FY2015 and that continued through FY2018. Beginning in FY2019, supplements required to fulfill the capital plan are planned to be transferred from the General Fund instead of spent from this category. The $100,000 of estimated spend reflected in this category after FY2018 is for purchases required to meet career tech spending obligations. 15 Year over Year Expenditure Trend 10 5 5 8.91% 5.55% 10 Year over Year Expenditure Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 18

3.060 4.060 Intergovernmental & Debt These lines account for pass through payments, as well as monies received by a district on behalf of another governmental entity, plus principal and interest payments for general fund borrowing. FY 2017 Intergov & Debt as a % of Total Expenditures FY 2017 Inte 0 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 Intergovernmental & Debt Service Actual and Projected N/A 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0.00% Year over Year Expenditure Trend 0.00% Year over Year Expenditure Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 19

4.300 Other Objects Primary components for this expenditure line are membership dues and fees, ESC contract deductions, County Auditor/Treasurer fees, audit expenses, and election expenses. FY 2017 Other Objects as a % of Total Expenditures FY 2017 Oth 0 1.2% $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 Other Objects Actual and Projected $400,000 $200,000 $982,280 $391,741 $286,625 $364,286 $421,798 $432,902 $437,897 $463,013 $438,534 $469,475 As mentioned previously, a large majority of this category s expenses were related to the Pickaway ESC shared service contract. Beginning in FY14 these expenses were reclassified and now are reflected in the Purchased Service category. The majority of this category s remaining expenses are related to County Auditor and Treasurer fees. Estimates for these expenses consider the timing and collection of county fees leading up to property reappraisals. 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year over Year Expenditure Trend 2.26% 12.47% Year over Year Expenditure Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 20

5.040 Total Other Financing Uses Operating transfers out, advances out to other funds, and all other general fund financing uses. FY 2017 Other Financing Uses as a % of Total FY 2017 Oth Expenditures 0 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 Other Financing Uses Actual and Projected $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $197,500 $32,681 $6,642 $400,000 $15,000 $2,206,818 $1,423,552 $290,552 $326,552 The spike reflected in 2016 is related to the transfer of $400,000 to the District's PI fund to supplement a $1,993,206 energy conservation project. The remainder of the project was funded with savings generated from refinancing the District's outstanding 2005 bonds. The energy savings achieved from the project since its completion are on track to be repay the initial capital outlay in 8 years. Beginning in FY2019, this category also reflects the General Fund s commitment to bridge any funding shortfall necessary to accomplish the adopted Capital Spending plan (the District s Permanent Improvement Fund or Maintenance Set Aside Fund are used first). However, this spending plan can be scaled back if finances deteriorate between now and the start of a given capital project. Outside of these limited purposes, advances and transfers are used sparingly and only when other spending categories do not appropriately capture the essence of a transaction. Nominal other activity is expected. 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 200 Year over Year Expenditure Trend 3627.36% 1770.16% Year over Year Expenditure Variance Actual 5 Year Average Projected 5 Year Average 21

Forecast Compare Comparison of Previous Forecast Amounts to Current Forecasted Numbers F.Y. 2018 Column A Column B Column C Column D Previous Current Dollar Percent Forecast Forecast Difference Difference Amounts For Amounts For Between Between F.Y. 2018 F.Y. 2018 Previous Previous Prepared on: Prepared on: and and Revenue: 9/25/2017 4/9/2018 Current Current 1 Real Estate & Property Allocation $9,336,626 $9,753,176 $416,550 4.5% 2 Public Utility Personal Property $1,069,478 $1,085,921 $16,443 1.5% 3 Income Tax $7,031,255 $7,156,504 $125,249 1.8% 4 State Foundation Restricted & Unrestricted $20,269,581 $20,656,657 $387,077 1.9% 5 Other Revenue $1,750,245 $1,954,243 $203,998 11.7% 6 Other Non Operating Revenue $91,216 $91,216 7 Total Revenue $39,548,401 $40,697,718 $1,149,317 2.9% Expenditures: 8 Salaries $22,365,887 $22,338,812 $27,075 0.1% 9 Fringe Benefits $7,385,197 $7,504,756 $119,559 1.6% 10 Purchased Services $4,931,082 $4,868,510 $62,572 1.3% 11 Supplies, Debt, Capital Outlay & Other $2,445,081 $2,323,781 $121,300 5.0% 12 Other Non Operating Expenditures $15,000 $15,000 13 Total Expenditures $37,142,247 $37,050,858 $91,388 0.2% 14 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures $2,406,154 $3,646,860 $1,240,706 3.3%* 15 Ending Cash Balance $20,683,898 $21,924,603 $1,240,706 3.3%* *Percentage expressed in terms of total expenditures Revenue estimates for FY2018 are up 2.9% from those filed this past fall. Improvement can be seen in all operational revenue line items. Local tax collections are up thanks in part to higher real estate values related to the 2017 Pickaway County reassessment of home values. Income tax collection have also outperformed original estimates by over $125,000 and finally state funding has been aided by enrollment levels that are approximately 50 students higher than estimates made at the beginning of the fiscal year. Spending in FY2018 has tracked very closely to those produced this past fall and have only been revised down by 0.2% or $91,388. Overall, the FY2018 forecast trend remains little changed from the fall forecast filing. 22

Actual FORECASTED Fiscal Year: 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Revenue: 1.010 General Property Tax (Real Estate) 8,100,905 8,617,845 8,399,805 8,675,622 8,875,800 9,074,413 1.020 Public Utility Personal Property 1,066,845 1,085,921 1,072,860 1,062,131 1,051,510 1,040,995 1.030 Income Tax 6,706,959 7,156,504 7,321,314 7,489,831 7,662,140 7,838,326 1.035 Unrestricted Grants in Aid 19,150,718 20,246,195 20,349,640 21,157,212 21,924,281 22,795,520 1.040 Restricted Grants in Aid 333,355 410,463 368,853 368,853 370,520 371,841 1.045 Restricted Federal Grants SFSF 1.050 Property Tax Allocation 1,100,601 1,135,331 1,177,536 1,198,032 1,226,605 1,255,993 1.060 All Other Operating Revenues 1,616,376 1,954,243 1,892,676 1,921,918 1,954,074 1,986,619 1.070 Total Revenue 38,075,759 40,606,502 40,582,684 41,873,600 43,064,930 44,363,708 Other Financing Sources: 2.010 Proceeds from Sale of Notes 2.020 State Emergency Loans and Adv 2.040 Operating Transfers In 2.050 Advances In 18,129 2.060 All Other Financing Sources 4,650 91,216 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 2.070 Total Other Financing Sources 22,779 91,216 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 2.080 Total Rev & Other Sources 38,098,538 40,697,718 40,600,684 41,891,600 43,082,930 44,381,708 Expenditures: 3.010 Personnel Services 20,795,813 22,338,812 23,688,929 24,590,526 25,554,595 26,543,543 3.020 Employee Benefits 6,829,629 7,504,756 8,739,903 9,357,048 10,029,021 10,746,950 3.030 Purchased Services 4,913,841 4,868,510 5,090,548 5,258,516 5,434,022 5,615,402 3.040 Supplies and Materials 1,278,307 1,226,826 1,263,631 1,301,540 1,340,586 1,380,804 3.050 Capital Outlay 312,225 664,052 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 3.060 Intergovernmental Debt Service: 4.010 Principal All Years 4.020 Principal Notes 4.030 Principal State Loans 4.040 Principal State Advances 4.050 Principal HB264 Loan 4.055 Principal Other 4.060 Interest and Fiscal Charges 4.300 Other Objects 421,798 432,902 437,897 463,013 438,534 469,475 4.500 Total Expenditures 34,551,613 37,035,858 39,320,908 41,070,643 42,896,758 44,856,173 Other Financing Uses 5.010 Operating Transfers Out 2,191,818 1,408,552 275,552 311,552 5.020 Advances Out 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 5.030 All Other Financing Uses 5.040 Total Other Financing Uses 15,000 2,206,818 1,423,552 290,552 326,552 5.050 Total Exp and Other Financing Uses 34,551,613 37,050,858 41,527,726 42,494,195 43,187,310 45,182,725 6.010 Excess of Rev Over/(Under) Exp 3,546,925 3,646,860 (927,042) (602,595) (104,380) (801,017) 7.010 Cash Balance July 1 (No Levies) 14,730,819 18,277,744 21,924,603 20,997,561 20,394,966 20,290,586 7.020 Cash Balance June 30 (No Levies) 18,277,744 21,924,603 20,997,561 20,394,966 20,290,586 19,489,569 8.010 Estimated Encumbrances June 30 1,068,436 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 9.080 Reservations Subtotal 10.010 Fund Bal June 30 for Cert of App 17,209,308 21,524,603 20,597,561 19,994,966 19,890,586 19,089,569 Rev from Replacement/Renewal Levies 11.010 & 11.020 Income & Property Tax Renewal 11.030 Cumulative Balance of Levies 12.010 Fund Bal June 30 for Cert of Obligations 17,209,308 21,524,603 20,597,561 19,994,966 19,890,586 19,089,569 Revenue from New Levies 13.010 & 13.020 Income & Property Tax New 13.030 Cumulative Balance of New Levies 15.010 Unreserved Fund Balance June 30 17,209,308 21,524,603 20,597,561 19,994,966 19,890,586 19,089,569 23

Supplemental Page 1 FY2020 Cash Reserves Despite the small projected revenue shortfall in FY2020, the District s cash reserves are anticipated to remain comfortably above standard benchmark measures. The revenue shortfall projected for FY2020 signals a continued need to properly plan to avoid a less sustainable downward trend. Fortunately, Teays Valley has the ability to modify spending dedicated to capital projects if the need becomes pressing prior to considering more drastic operational cuts. 24

Supplemental Page 2 Forecast Changes: 3 Year View 2018 2019 2020 Dollar Dollar Dollar Difference Difference Difference Between Between Between Previous Previous Previous and and and Revenue: Current Current Current 1 Real Estate & Property Allocation $416,550 $6,387 $59,973 2 Public Utility Personal Property $16,443 $2,080 $2,059 3 Income Tax $125,249 $128,067 $130,949 4 State Foundation Restricted & Unrestricted $387,077 $259,339 $278,601 5 Other Revenue $203,998 $178,733 $187,308 6 Other Non Operating Revenue 7 Total Revenue $1,149,317 $561,834 $658,891 Expenditures: 8 Salaries $27,075 $270,549 $314,402 9 Fringe Benefits $119,559 $256,833 $279,817 10 Purchased Services $62,572 $5,015 $17,137 11 Supplies, Debt, Capital Outlay & Other $121,300 $2,016,727 $1,377,294 12 Other Non Operating Expenditures $2,191,818 $1,408,552 13 Total Expenditures $91,388 $697,458 $642,613 14 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures $1,240,706 $135,624 $16,278 15 Ending Cash Balance $1,240,706 $1,105,081 $1,121,359 Revenue: Line 1 Property tax collections have been increased related to slightly higher 2017 tax valuations than originally forecasted. Line 3 Income tax collections for first three quarterly distributions are up approximately $125,000. Subsequent annual estimates have been adjusted to consider the current year s results. Line 4 State aid estimates have been revised up due to higher resident enrollment levels coupled with lower outgoing open enrolled and community school students. Line 5 Improved investment earnings are the primary reason for the upward revision in estimates noted. Expenditures: Line 8 Beginning in FY2019 Salaries estimates have been increased to account for an additional staffing needs in response to enrollment demands (regular & special needs) and to improve instructional services offered. Line 9 Fringe Benefit estimates have been adjusted slightly higher primarily to account for additional employee health plans. Line 10 Purchased Services estimates have been decreased related to lower levels of outgoing open enrollment and community school students. Line 11 & Line 12 Beginning in FY2019, dollars needed to fulfill the District s Capital Spending Plan will be reflected as a Non Operating Transfer (Line 12) to the PI fund, as opposed to a General Fund operating expense (Line 11). 25

Supplemental Page 3 Enrollment Estimates Head Count Summary/Analysis 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Prior Year Actual/Estimated Enrollment (October Count) 3,935 4,006 4,049 4,047 4,098 Projected Changes to Prior Year Enrollment Net All Grade Level Mobility Factor (Change) to Prior Year 44 48 42 46 44 Net Aggregate Manual Adjustments to Mobility Factor 17 0 0 0 0 New Kindergartners In 298 269 259 286 265 Loss of Seniors from Prior Year 288 274 303 281 269 Net Change in Outgoing and Incoming Pupils 10 5 44 5 4 Current Year Estimated Enrollment (Simulated October Count) 4,006 4,049 4,047 4,098 4,138 District Head Count Grade K 298 269 259 286 265 1 270 322 291 280 309 2 327 272 325 293 282 3 339 334 278 332 299 4 306 346 341 284 339 5 343 311 351 346 288 6 324 358 325 366 361 7 281 330 365 331 373 8 320 282 331 366 332 9 302 335 295 346 383 10 297 285 316 278 326 11 325 302 289 321 282 12 274 303 281 269 299 Total Can Differ by Rounding 4,006 4,049 4,047 4,098 4,138 Year Over Year Percentage Change 1.81% 1.07% 0.05% 1.26% 0.98% Historic vs. Projected Enrollment 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 4,138 3,935 2006 3,327 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3,327 3,490 3,580 3,600 3,659 3,684 3,733 3,757 3,786 3,872 2016 2017 2018 P 2019 P 2020 P 2021 P 2022 P 3,983 3,935 4,006 4,049 4,047 4,098 4,138 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 P 2019 P 2020 P 2021 P 2022 P 26