ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

Similar documents
ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

Solutions to Midterm Exam. ECON Financial Economics Boston College, Department of Economics Spring Tuesday, March 19, 10:30-11:45am

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

Lecture 1: Lucas Model and Asset Pricing

Cash Flows on Options strike or exercise price

( 0) ,...,S N ,S 2 ( 0)... S N S 2. N and a portfolio is created that way, the value of the portfolio at time 0 is: (0) N S N ( 1, ) +...

A GLOSSARY OF FINANCIAL TERMS MICHAEL J. SHARPE, MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT, UCSD

Optimal Portfolio Selection

Hedging and Pricing in the Binomial Model

#10. Problems 1 through 10, part a). Fi8000 Practice Set #1 Check Solutions 1. Payoff. Payoff #8 Payoff S

Lecture 2: Stochastic Discount Factor

Stochastic Models. Introduction to Derivatives. Walt Pohl. April 10, Department of Business Administration

Risk-Neutral Probabilities

Finance 402: Problem Set 7 Solutions

Mathematics of Financial Derivatives

Mathematics of Financial Derivatives. Zero-coupon rates and bond pricing. Lecture 9. Zero-coupons. Notes. Notes

Replicator Dynamics 1

Radner Equilibrium: Definition and Equivalence with Arrow-Debreu Equilibrium

9.13 Use Crammer s rule to solve the following two systems of equations.

Lecture 16. Options and option pricing. Lecture 16 1 / 22

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Answers Econ 8712

EconS Constrained Consumer Choice

The Multistep Binomial Model

Slides III - Complete Markets

Problem Set 4 Answers

Lecture 10 An introduction to Pricing Forward Contracts.

ECON 815. Uncertainty and Asset Prices

CHAPTER 17 OPTIONS AND CORPORATE FINANCE

Beyond Modern Portfolio Theory to Modern Investment Technology. Contingent Claims Analysis and Life-Cycle Finance. December 27, 2007.

Binomial Trees. Liuren Wu. Options Markets. Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College. Liuren Wu (Baruch ) Binomial Trees Options Markets 1 / 22

Efficient Market Making via Convex Optimization, and a Connection to Online Learning

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Joseph L. Rotman School of Management SOLUTIONS. C (1 + r 2. 1 (1 + r. PV = C r. we have that C = PV r = $40,000(0.10) = $4,000.

Binomial Trees. Liuren Wu. Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College. Options Markets

From Discrete Time to Continuous Time Modeling

Uncertainty in Equilibrium

δ j 1 (S j S j 1 ) (2.3) j=1

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Fall 2013 D. Romer

October An Equilibrium of the First Price Sealed Bid Auction for an Arbitrary Distribution.

Global Financial Management

Answer Key: Problem Set 4

Fundamental Theorems of Asset Pricing. 3.1 Arbitrage and risk neutral probability measures

1 Asset Pricing: Replicating portfolios

1. 2 marks each True/False: briefly explain (no formal proofs/derivations are required for full mark).

SAMPLE SOLUTIONS FOR DERIVATIVES MARKETS

A model for a large investor trading at market indifference prices

Lecture 17 Option pricing in the one-period binomial model.

One-Period Valuation Theory

Forward and Futures Contracts

International Economics Lecture 2: The Ricardian Model

Chapter 3: Financial Decision Making and the Law of One Price

Review of Derivatives I. Matti Suominen, Aalto

Chapter 3: Financial Decision Making and the Law of One Price

Finance 100 Problem Set 6 Futures (Alternative Solutions)

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Joseph L. Rotman School of Management SOLUTIONS

EXTRA PROBLEMS. and. a b c d

Optimal Portfolios under a Value at Risk Constraint

The Multiplier Effect

Feb. 20th, Recursive, Stochastic Growth Model

Projects to Avoid Catastrophes

Second Midterm Exam. Portfolio Beta Expected Return X 1 9% Y 2 10% Is there an arbitrage opportunity? If so, what exactly is it?

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

This assignment is due on Tuesday, September 15, at the beginning of class (or sooner).

Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing

Black-Scholes-Merton Model

e62 Introduction to Optimization Fall 2016 Professor Benjamin Van Roy Homework 1 Solutions

EconS Substitution E ects

Resource Allocation and Decision Analysis (ECON 8010) Spring 2014 Foundations of Decision Analysis

4.5 Comparing Exponential Functions

CHAPTER 20 Spotting and Valuing Options

Consider the Texaco-Pennzoil case in influence-diagram form, as shown in Figure 4S.1.

Pricing theory of financial derivatives

This is Appendix B: Extensions of the Aggregate Expenditures Model, appendix 2 from the book Economics Principles (index.html) (v. 2.0).

6.4 Solving Linear Inequalities by Using Addition and Subtraction

ECOM 009 Macroeconomics B. Lecture 7

CHAPTER 5. Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Historical Record INVESTMENTS BODIE, KANE, MARCUS. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Time, Uncertainty, and Incomplete Markets

Practice of Finance: Advanced Corporate Risk Management

ECON 581. Introduction to Arrow-Debreu Pricing and Complete Markets. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

Econ 422 Eric Zivot Summer 2005 Final Exam Solutions

Help Session 4. David Sovich. Washington University in St. Louis

Technical Appendix to Asset Prices in a Huggett Economy

One-Period Valuation Theory

Martingale Approach to Pricing and Hedging

Homework Assignment #1: Answer Sheet

Compulsory Assignment

Asset Pricing. Chapter XI. The Martingale Measure: Part I. June 20, 2006

Consumption and Asset Pricing

Arrow-Debreu Equilibrium

Introduction Random Walk One-Period Option Pricing Binomial Option Pricing Nice Math. Binomial Models. Christopher Ting.

Chapter 5. Finance 300 David Moore

General Equilibrium under Uncertainty

Predicting the Market

A. Introduction to choice under uncertainty 2. B. Risk aversion 11. C. Favorable gambles 15. D. Measures of risk aversion 20. E.

Transcription:

ECON 337901 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS Peter Ireland Boston College February 19, 2019 These lecture notes by Peter Ireland are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

Do we really observe consumers trading in contingent claims? Yes, if we think of financial assets as bundles of contingent claims. This insight is also Arrow and Debreu s.

A stock is a risky asset that pays dividend d G next year in the good state and d B next year in the bad state. These payoffs can be replicated by buying d G contingent claims for the good state and d B contingent claims for the bad state.

Payoffs for the stock.

A bond is a safe asset that pays off one next year in the good state and one next year in the bad state. These payoffs can be replicated by buying one contingent claim for the good state and one contingent claim for the bad state.

Payoffs for the bond.

If we start with knowledge of the contingent claims prices q G and q B, then we can infer that the stock must sell today for q stock = q G d G + q B d B. Since if the stock cost more than the equivalent bundle of contingent claims, traders could make profits for sure by short selling the stock and buying the contingent claims; and if the stock cost less than the equivalent bundle of contingent claims, traders could make profits for sure by buying the stock and selling the contingent claims.

Pricing the stock.

Likewise, if we start with knowledge of the contingent claims prices q G and q B, then we can infer that the bond must sell today for q bond = q G + q B. Since the bond pays off one for sure next year, the interest rate, defined as the return on the risk-free bond, is 1 + r = 1 q bond = 1 q G + q B. The bond price relates to the interest rate via q bond = 1 1 + r.

Pricing the bond.

We ve already seen how contingent claims can be used to replicate the stock and the bond. Now let s see how the stock and the bond can be used to replicate the contingent claims.

Consider buying s shares of stock and b bonds, in order to replicate the contingent claim for the good state. In the good state, the payoffs should be sd G + b = 1 and in the bad state, the payoffs should be sd B + b = 0 since the contingent claim pays off one in the good state and zero in the bad state.

To replicate the contingent claim for the good state: sd G + b = 1 sd B + b = 0 b = sd B Substitute the second equation into the first to solve for s = B 1 d and b = d G d B d G d B Since s and b are of opposite sign, this requires going long one asset and short the other.

To replicate the contingent claim for the good state: s = B 1 d and b = d G d B d G d B If we know the prices q stock and q bond of the stock and bond, we can infer that in the absence of arbitrage, the claim for the good state would have price q G = q stock s + q bond b = qstock d B q bond d G d B.

Consider buying s shares of stock and b bonds, in order to replicate the contingent claim for the bad state. In the good state, the payoffs should be sd G + b = 0 and in the bad state, the payoffs should be sd B + b = 1 since the contingent claim pays off one in the bad state and zero in the good state.

To replicate the contingent claim for the bad state: sd G + b = 0 b = sd G sd B + b = 1 Substitute the first equation into the second to solve for s = 1 d G d B and b = d G d G d B Once again, this requires going long one asset and short the other.

To replicate the contingent claim for the bad state: s = 1 d G d B and b = d G d G d B Once again, if we know the prices q stock and q bond of the stock and bond, we can infer that in the absence of arbitrage, the claim for the bad state would have price q B = q stock s + q bond b = d G q bond q stock d G d B.