April 3, 4, & 5, 2017 Pittsburgh, Butler, Erie Western PA

Similar documents
Sources of FEMA Funding

Key Fundamentals of Flood Insurance in the NFIP!

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Mitigation 101. KAMM Regional Training. February March Esther White, Speaker

Hazard Mitigation Overview

Interagency Nonstructural Flood Risk Management Workshop. Carey Johnson Kentucky Division of Water

FEMA s Non-Disaster Grant Programs

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

Mitigation Measures: Sound Investments in Disaster Recovery

ORBCRE Symposium & ORBA Summit

GAFM Showcase: Multiple Agencies Combating Georgia s Flood Risk Together: Proven Results Gained by Strong Partnerships

1.1. PURPOSE 1.2. AUTHORITIES 1. INTRODUCTION

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

SILVER JACKETS: TEAMING TO MITIGATE AND MANAGE STATE FLOOD HAZARD PRIORITIES

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

National Flood Risk Management Program

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Discovery Meeting: Middle Potomac- Catoctin Watershed. FEMA REGION III September 26, 2012 Rockville, MD and Fairfax, VA

Cumberland County, NJ. Risk MAP Project Status Update April 22, 2013

FEMA Leverages Building Codes and Standards to Advance Resiliency

Erie County Flood Risk Review Meeting. January 18, 2018

2017 FEMA Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Grant Program Public Information Meeting. September 9, 2017

Strategies for Increasing Flood Resiliency

NONSTRUCTURAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT FOR LYCOMING COUNTY LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

In 1993, spring came in like a lion, but refused

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

ASFPM RECOMMENDED TASK FORCE ACTIONS

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Kevin Wagner Maryland Department of the Environment

Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) Program

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING 1.2 PLANNING REQUIREMENTS Local Mitigation Plans

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

Winter Storm Jonas Hazard Mitigation Grant Program

California Building Code and the NFIP. John Ingargiola, Senior Engineer FEMA Building Science Branch

Flood Risk Review and Resilience Meeting: Allegheny County

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Flood Risk and Climate Adaptation: Policy Reforms and Lessons (Being) Learned from Hurricane Sandy

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

ASFPM Update OUR CHALLENGE. Floods are 'acts of God,' but flood losses are largely acts of man. Fall, 2016

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Making the NFIP Work for Taxpayers and Policy Holders: Reducing Flood Losses and NFIP Premiums through Mitigation

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Repetitive Loss Area Revisit # 6 Walter Road Area Jefferson Parish

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Resources for Disaster Recovery Terry Lunn Hazard Mitigation Division Director

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Testimony of the National Association of Flood And Stormwater Management Agencies. Water Resources Development Act of 2012

Welcome to a Silver Jackets Webinar

APPENDIX 1 FEMA MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAMS

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Public Meeting 28 November Presented by: Deepa Srinivasan, Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Dr. Michael Scott, ESRGC, Salisbury University

Modernization, FEMA is Recognizing the connection between damage reduction and

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

Flood Insurance vs. Disaster Assistance. Janice Mitchell FEMA, Region

CDBG-DR, BW-12, CRS and Dauphin County, PA: What do they have in common? 2015 ASFPM Annual Conference

Flood-Risk Reduction and Resilience: Federal Assistance and Programs

Silver Jackets - Flood Risk Management Program

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

IN THIS ISSUE SPRING FLOODS. Black River, Pocahontas, Arkansas

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND FLOOD MITIGATION

LMS TIMES. Director s Corner. This Issue:

UNIT 2: THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM

The Breadth of the Planning Portfolio

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) Together North Jersey Resilient Task Force Meeting

Floodplain Management Services Baltimore District Studies

Public Information Meeting Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Grants

USACE Planning 101 Planning Basics for Partners

Community Coordination Meeting. York County, Maine. Risk MAP Study

COASTAL HAZARD MITIGATION TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES

Flood Risk Review (FRR) Meeting. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania Carlisle, Pennsylvania December 5, 2016

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

TS18 Mitigation Grant Application and Benefit Cost Analysis Development - Support Documentation - Governor s Hurricane Conference 2017

Georgia Silver Jackets Team

State of Vermont FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT WORK PLAN

9.48 NORTHAMPTON BOROUGH

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

National Flood Insurance Program Making Sense of April 2019 Changes

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Mercer County Kick-off Meeting December 6, 2006

Federal Emergency Management Agency Update. Jesse F. Munoz, CEM Director Mitigation Division Region IV

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION

9.8 FOUNTAIN HILL BOROUGH

Transcription:

April 3, 4, & 5, 2017 Pittsburgh, Butler, Erie Western PA

2

Hazard Mitigation is: any cost-effective action taken to eliminate or reduce the long term risk to life and property from natural and technological hazards. Need to also think about PLACE!! 3

Acquisition/Demolition of damaged, substantially damaged, or destroyed homes. Small structural projects using FEMA Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Software. Other eligible State Initiative flood mitigation opportunities (up to 5% of the grant total). Development of County Hazard Mitigation Plans (allowable amount up to 7% of the grant total). Home elevation projects. Eligible business mitigation activities; e.g. flood-proofing or other resilient mitigation retrofitting measures. Note: Other federal and state programs are available for structural projects. 4

Grant Programs Available Disaster Declaration: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Non-Disaster: Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) *These are FEMA programs administered by PEMA 5

What is the Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) Grant Program? Created in 1988 by the Stafford Act and the National Flood Insurance Program FEMA provides 75% or more match funds to States to fund pre- and post-disaster hazard mitigation measures Overall Goal: Reduce vulnerability to natural hazards 6

To prevent future loss of life and property due to natural disasters. To provide funding for previously identified mitigation measures that benefit the disaster area. To implement State, County, and Municipal Hazard Mitigation Plans. 7

75% Federal share 25% Non-Federal share (usually 22% State and 3% Local) 5% State Initiatives 7% HM Planning Required FEMA Approved Hazard Mitigation (HM) Plan State HM Team reviews all projects/ranks/prioritizes In-Kind Match must be stated up front May use Public Assistance Section 403, 407, and ICC Funds for demolition costs State may use CDBG/CDBG-DR funds for Global local match 8

County must have an approved and adopted All Hazard Mitigation (322) Plan. Municipality must have participated and adopted the approved county plan. Projects must meet the FEMA, State, and local municipal strategies. Requested project funding must have been identified as a mitigation activity in the county plan. 9

State, County, and Municipal Governments Certain private non-profit organizations or institutions that own or operate a private non-profit facility 10

Projects on private property may be eligible for funding under the HMGP only if submitted by a municipal government entity (County, City, Township, Borough, etc.). Participation in an HMGP project by a private citizen MUST BE VOLUNTARY! 11

Mitigation Projects Property Acquisition and Structure Demolition Structure Relocation Dry Floodproofing of Historic Residential Structures Dry Floodproofing of Non residential Structures Minor Localized Flood Reduction Projects Structural Retrofitting of Existing Buildings Non structural Retrofitting of Existing Buildings and Facilities Safe Room Construction Infrastructure Retrofit Structure Elevation Soil Stabilization Wildfire Mitigation Post disaster Code Enforcement 5% Initiative Projects Hazard Mitigation Planning (counties) [7% Cap] 12

Deferred maintenance!! Repair or replacement of existing infrastructure, roads, facilities, etc. Debris/snow removal, stream-related work Bridge replacement Mitigation for damaged infrastructure that can be funded under Public Assistance 13

Nationally competitive Annually (Technical & Peer Reviews) 75% Federal share 25% Non-Federal share For BCA Eligible Structural Projects For County Hazard Mitigation Planning State HM Team reviews all projects/ranks/prioritizes In-Kind Match must be stated up front Congress allocates funds each year for this grant program; and an associated national and state cap. Community Rating System (CRS) Receive additional points Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) Receive additional points 14

Nationally competitive 100% Federal share (SRL State Strategy) SRL Properties For BCA Eligible Projects Elevation or Acquisition Must be on NFIP SRL Listing/ Community in Good Standing /Must carry NFIP policy forever May use Greatest Savings to the Funds Amount vs. BCA State HM Team reviews all projects/ranks/prioritizes In-Kind Match must be stated up front Community Rating System (CRS) Receive additional points 15

Severe Repetitive Loss An SRL property is defined as a residential property that is covered under an NFIP flood insurance policy and: (a) That has at least four NFIP claim payments (including building and contents) over $5,000 each, and the cumulative amount of such claims payments exceeds $20,000; or (b) For which at least two separate claims payments (building payments only) have been made with the cumulative amount of the building portion of such claims exceeding the market value of the building. c) For both (a) and (b) above, at least two of the referenced claims must have occurred within any ten-year period, and must be greater than 10 days apart. 16

Repetitive Loss A Repetitive Loss property (RL) is any insurable building for which two or more claims of more than $1,000 have been paid by the NFIP during any rolling 10-year period since 1978. Claims must be at least 10 days apart but within 10 years of each other. 17

Nationally competitive 90% Federal share 10% Non-Federal share For BCA Eligible Projects Residential Elevation or Acquisition State HM Team will review all projects/ranks/prioritizes In-Kind Match must be stated up front Must be on NFIP SRL Listing/ Community in Good Standing/Must carry NFIP policy forever May use Greatest Savings to the Funds Amount vs. BCA State HM Team reviews all projects/ranks/prioritizes In-Kind Match must be stated up front May use NFIP Increase Cost of Compliance (ICC) funding toward the 10% local match. 18

Send in Letter of Intent or Interest/Pre-Application (on PEMA Website) BE SPECIFIC ON DOCUMENT!! PEMA reviews pre-applications. PEMA sends out an application packet if it meets eligibility criteria (municipality will be notified either way via electronic means). Applicant completes the HMGP application. Disaster Applications must be sent to FEMA within 1 year of the disaster declaration date. Non-Disaster Grants have a few month window 19

Click on Response & Recovery HMGP Letter of Intent/Pre-Application can be downloaded from the PEMA website www.pema.pa.gov Click on Disaster Assistance, then Hazard Mitigation Dropdown Scroll down and click on HM FORMS, Presentations, Other Documents. LOI form is under Unified Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Form 00 or 19 20

BENEFIT (Reduced Damage) ------------------------------ = 1.0 + PROJECT COST 100 yr flood 50 yr flood 10 yr flood Where a house sits in the floodplain predicts how often and much damage will occur over time. 21

BCA Benefit Cost Analysis, a quantitative procedure that compares the cost effectiveness of a hazard mitigation measure by taking a long-term view of avoided future damages as compared to the cost of a project. 22

BCR Benefit Cost Ratio, a numerical expression of the cost effectiveness of a project calculated as the net present value of total project benefits divided by the net present value of total project cost. A score of above 1.0 is required to be a passing BCR. 23

Example: An acquisition project has a total cost of $250,000 BCA Benefits of $475,000 over 100 years. BCR Benefits divided by cost of project. ($475,000 $250,000= 1.88) = Passing BCR 24

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG 25

USACE Representation in Pennsylvania (USACE area of responsibility based upon watershed boundaries) LRD LRD Great Lakes & Ohio River Division Pittsburgh District Buffalo District NAD North Atlantic Division Baltimore District (State Lead) Philadelphia District 26

Silver Jackets Program - Pennsylvania PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The Silver Jackets Program focuses on developing collaborative solutions with partner state and federal agencies to address state recognized flood risk problems. This effort is a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers initiative and is managed through the FPMS Program. State teams meet regularly. PROBLEM AND NEED: Devastating flood events continue to occur annually, resulting in loss of life and billions of dollars in damages to public buildings, critical facilities, residential and commercial structures, and industrial centers. Programs and authorities to address these risks are leveraged among several agencies to develop comprehensive solutions. 27

US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs Flood Plain Management Services Program (FPMS) Silver Jackets Program (SJ) Planning Assistance to States Program (PAS / Section 22) General Investigations (large-scale flood risk management) Continuing Authorities Program o Section 205; Flood Risk Management o Section 14; Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection o Section 206; Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration 28

Flood Plain Management Services Program (FPMS) Authority and Scope: Section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960, as amended, provides authority for the Corps of Engineers to provide a full range of flood risk information, technical services and planning guidance to support and promote effective flood risk and floodplain management. The Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) program is to advise, recommend, educate, inform and provide technical support to others, both external and internal, so that informed decisions with respect to floodplain management can be made. Under FPMS, the Corps of Engineers can provide: Technical services Planning assistance and guides and pamphlets for floodplain management The purpose of floodplain management is to help prevent or reduce flood damage by using either structural or nonstructural mitigation measures or a combination of the two. For additional information on nonstructural measures, visit: www.usace.army.mil/missions/civilworks/projectplanning/nfpc.aspx. 29

Provide technical assistance that is focused on reducing flood risk Development of guides and pamphlets for communication and education of flood risk Proper use of floodplains (coastal and riverine) Support of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Many communities are not aware of their risk of flooding 30

Planning Assistance to States Program (PAS or Sec-22) Authority and Scope: Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, as amended, provides authority for the Corps of Engineers to assist states, local governments, federallyrecognized Native American Tribes and other non-federal entities in the preparation of comprehensive plans for the development, utilization and conservation of water and related land resources. Under the Section 22 Program, the Corps of Engineers can provide technical planning assistance in all areas related to water resources development. Studies: Are planning level of detail Do not include detailed design for project construction. The studies generally involve: Analysis of existing data for planning purposes using standard engineering techniques. All efforts are required to be conducted by USACE personnel. Sample letters for requesting a Section 22 study can be found at: www.nwo.usace.army.mil/html/pd-p/plan_formulation/tap/tap_22_letter.html 31

Program Coverage o Water and related resource planning o Study authority not implementation authority Annual reporting requirements for program execution Study Sponsors o Non-Federal: must be recognized body of the State/Tribe o Non-profits not allowed to cost-share PAS Studies Yearly limit of $2 Million per State (when funds are available) 32

General Investigations A General Investigation (GI) study often begins with a request for assistance from a community or a local or state government entity with a water resource need (e.g., navigation, flood protection or ecosystem restoration) beyond its capability. Before initiating a study, the Corps generally requires two types of congressional authority - authorization and appropriations. There are two project phases before construction begins using GI funding: Feasibility Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED). Typically used for FRM projects in excess of $20M PED initiates with the negotiation of a Design Agreement (DA) and can last until completion of plans and specifications or receipt of Construction General (CG) funding. It is during the PED phase that the Project Partnership Agreement (PPA) is developed, which outlines the sponsor s and Corps responsibilities for project construction and operation and maintenance after construction is complete. The execution of the PPA cannot occur until after Congress has authorized the project for construction. 33

Continuing Authorities Program Flood Risk Management: Authority: Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended Allows for construction of projects (structural or nonstructural) to reduce damages caused by flooding and focuses on solving local flood problems in urban areas, towns and villages Cost share for Design and Implementation is 65% federal, 35% non-federal Maximum federal share for planning, design and construction - $13,000,000 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection: Authority: Section 14 Allows for construction of emergency streambank and shoreline protection to prevent erosion from damaging nonprofit public facilities Maximum federal share for planning, design and construction - $5,000,000 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration: Authority: Section 206 Allows for structural or operational changes to restore historic habitat conditions of aquatic ecosystems at any location to benefit fish and wildlife resources Maximum federal share for planning, design and construction - $10,000,000 34

Studies Only Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) o Cost Share: 100% Federal Planning Assistance to States (Section 22) o Cost Share: 50% Federal 50% Sponsor Studies to Construction Continuing Authorities Program ($20M Limit) o Cost Share Study: 50% / 50% o Cost Share Construction: 65% Federal 35% Sponsor General Investigations Program (> $20M) o Cost Share Study: 50% / 50% o Cost Share Construction: 65% Federal 35% Sponsor 35

THANK YOU US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG 36

Interagency Flood Mitigation Program Guide http://www.nfrmp.us/state/factpennsylvania.cfm Pennsylvania Silver Jackets / Flood Risk Management Resources Website Pennsylvania Interagency Flood Mitigation Program Guide, 2015 Pennsylvania Mitigation Success Stories Flood Risk Mgmt Online Resources http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/home/silverjackets.aspx 37

38

HUD program administered by DCED Uses Nonstructural flood proofing measures, housing rehabilitation, public services, community facilities, infrastructure improvement, development and planning Funding - Entitlement funding is set by formula. Competitive Program is $500,000 maximum Eligibility 2 components Entitlement program which provides annual funding to designated municipalities Competitive program is available to all non-federal entitlement municipalities Terms - Seventy percent of each grant must be used for activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Refer to program guidelines. 39

Maps Identify Risk Ordinances, Grants & Loans Mitigate Risk Insurance Insure Against the Risk 40

Map Modernization - Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRMs) Digitized representation of the floodplain overlaid on the most recent available topography Very little new study data 41

42

Resources for municipal officials, homeowners External Links-FEMA, PEMA, NFIP, etc. Links to publications Risk Determination Tool Address Search In or Out Impacts/Responsibilities Insurance Development 43

Minimum Regulations Suggested Provisions Municipalities can and are encouraged to be more restrictive 44

Federal Program 1968 Administered Locally 2450 in PA Each state/territory and District of Columbia has a State Coordinator PA Dept. of Community & Economic Development 45

Failure to comply NFIP Flood Insurance will not be available for municipality s residences and businesses Community Withdraws or Suspended Existing NFIP policies will not be renewed No Federal Grants or Loans by Federal Agencies such as HUD, EPA, SBA and FEMA No federal Disaster Assistance may be provided to repair insurable buildings located in the Special Flood Hazard Areas for damage caused by a flood (Public Assistance, etc.) 46

Any resident of a NFIP participating community No federal disaster declaration required to file claim 47

Buildings in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA) in participating communities Used as security for a federally insured or regulated loan Golden Rule When your lender says so!! 48

Part of every flood insurance policy Up to $30,000 additional to bring a Substantially Damaged structure into compliance w/communities flood plain ordinance Substantial Damage Determination made by municipal official Four options Flood proofing nonresidential only Relocation Elevation Demolition Can be used for non-federal match for HMGP and SRL projects 49

Reduce flood damage to insurable property Strengthen and support the insurance aspects of the NFIP Encourage a comprehensive approach to floodplain management 50

Classes 1-9 5%-45% discounts on flood insurance 19 creditable activities in 4 classes Public Information Mapping and Regulations Flood Damage Reduction Flood Preparedness Majority of PA communities already qualify for Class 9 51

52

National Disaster Recovery Framework The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania must develop a central Long- Term Community Recovery synchronizing body, as per the National Disaster Recovery Framework Still addressing needs from the 2011 disasters: Economic Recovery Community planners/grant writing Strategic preparedness planning Natural Resource/Floodplain management Infrastructure Projects Housing repair, development, planning 53

NDRF Core Principles Individual and Family Empowerment Leadership and Local Primacy Pre-Disaster Recovery Planning Partnerships and Inclusiveness Public Information Unity of Effort Timeliness and Flexibility Resilience and Sustainability Psychological and Emotional Recovery 54

PURPOSE Improve local communities ability to implement disaster recovery strategies by: - Institutionalizing a process for ongoing communication and resource coordination among partners - Encouraging Business Development - Identifying potential public and private sector resources - Identifying communities private sector organizations in-need - Linking those in-need, with potential resources - Facilitating coordination among resource providers - Enhancing communication between those in-need and resources - Fostering resilient communities Reduce the amount of bureaucracy for recovering communities 55

GUIDING CONCEPTS Bottom-up approach The needs of the Community drive the Team s functions What matters is what you need not what we have Flatten the lines of communication between stakeholders Promote transparency and accountability 57

Recovery Resource Team Mission The mission of the Recovery Resource Team (RRT) is to institutionalize a process for ongoing communications and disaster recovery resource coordination among partners.* The RRT is co-chaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development (PA DCED), the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA), and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).** * ED900 Narrative Sections Revised 5-14-2012, pg 2. ** Award Number: 01-79-14191, Exhibit A, pg 1. 58

Organization Commonwealth Disaster Recovery Coordinator Commonwealth Disaster Recovery Specialist Disaster Recovery Support Specialist Commonwealt h Coordinators Steering Committe e PA Lt. Gov. DCED PEMA FEMA R3 EDD s RSF Roles outlined in NDRF Pages 45-62 Housing Recovery Working Group HUD PHFA and partners Economic Recovery Working Group EDA DCED/CFA and partners Infrastructure Recovery Working Group USACE PENNVEST and partners Community Planning & Capacity Building (CPCB) Working Group FEMA DCED/GCLGS and partners Health & Social Services Working Group HHS DPW and partners Natural and Cultural Resources Working Group DoI DCNR and partners Businesses, foundations, agencies, consortiums, associations, and other community stakeholders (EDD s, council members, universities, etc.) 59 59

What we are and are not A central point of contact for community leaders (mayors, town councils, community organizations) Facilitator of communication between communities in need with resource providers; BUT NOT a resource for Individual Assistance NOT a new level of bureaucracy NOT a replacement for systems/organizations already in place We do NOT Provide grants/funds directly 60

Points of Contact State Disaster Recovery Coordinator Jeffrey Allen. 717-214-7708. jeffallen@pa.gov State Disaster Recovery Specialist Vacant. 717-346-4423. Disaster Recovery Support Specialist Vacant. 717-720-1362. 61

PEMA: Tom Hughes State Hazard Mitigation Officer (717) 651-2726 thughes@pa.gov USACE: Michael Debes (412) 395-7327 USACE Pittsburgh Silver Jackets Coordinator Michael.R.Debes@usace.army.mil FEMA: David Bollinger Mitigation Outreach Coordinator (215) 931-5561 David.Bollinger@fema.dhs.gov PA DCED/NFIP: Dan Fitzpatrick State NFIP Coordinator (717) 720-7445 dafitzpatr@pa.gov Fred Chapman frchapman@pa.gov (717) 720-7396 PA DCED/RRT: Jeff Allen State Disaster Recovery Coordinator jeffallen@pa.gov (717) 214-7708 62