TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

Similar documents
TXDOT CONGESTION RELIEF INITIATIVE, INCLUDING

TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ACTIVITY

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

DRAFT UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A REVISION DATE 11/7/14. (Amounts in millions) Sum $0

2017 Educational Series FUNDING

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

CASH MANAGEMENT & CONTRACT AWARDS

TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES

HB 20 Initial Report. Revenue Projections Funding Categories & Allocations Performance-Based Decision Making

85 th Legislature: Impact on Funding and UTP

15,790. Bryan Waco Region. Do you own or lease a personal vehicle? What is your primary means of transportation?

17,321 13,351. Overall Statewide Results. How was the survey taken? Do you own or lease a personal vehicle?

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

Presentation by Joseph R. Krier Greater SA Chamber President/CEO

CONSTRUCTION STAFFING. Mario R. Jorge, P.E. District Engineer San Antonio District

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

Funding Update. House Transportation Subcommittee on Long-Term Infrastructure Planning September 10, 2015, 9:00 A.M. Capitol Extension E2.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PRESENTED TO HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. TxDOT has a Plan STRATEGIC PLAN FOR

FY LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST OVERVIEW

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT WITH COMMENTS AND RESPONSES. October Submitted for Review to TxDOT Executive Management

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Transportation Improvement Program Page 39

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

Methodology. Surveyed members from influential Chambers of Commerce in Texas: Arlington, Austin, Corpus Christi, Dallas, Fort Worth, and San Antonio.

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2011

Texas Department of Transportation 1

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

This annual continuing disclosure report contains or references the following information:

FUNDING CHANGES TO IH 635 EAST AND PROPOSITION 1 PROJECTS

HB 20 Preliminary Report

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 42 Planning and Development of Transportation Projects

Fiscal Year Revised VDOT Annual Budget November 2014

Construction Spending, Labor & Materials Outlook

FY STIP. Amarillo District May Quarterly Revisions STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHWAY

Overview of the Homestead Exemption Increase (SJR 1 and SB 1, 84 th Legislature)

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2018

MODULE 1: FUNDING TRANSIT IN TEXAS MODULE 1 1

How to Read the Project Modification Listings Roadway Section

Texas Bond Review Board

CHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL STRATEGIES: PAYING OUR WAY

5/3/2016. May 4, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Chapter VIII Financial Plan

Local Government Annual Report

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION POLICY Policies and Procedures to Streamline Project Delivery

APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Contribution and Benefit Decision-Making for Texas Public Retirement Systems

Mobility / Other Modes Roger Nober Executive Vice President Law and Secretary BNSF Railway

Transportation Improvement Program

Introduction. December 2008

Transportation Funding in the Charlotte Region


Transportation Funding

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

FY STIP. Paris District STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. October Out-of-Cycle Revisions HIGHWAY

Target Formula Re-evaluation

An Evaluation of the 2009 NHTS Add-on Surveys in Texas

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

Appendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

December Update of 2018 UTP Category 2 and Category 10 CBI. Requested Amount

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

Technical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast

Driving Ahead for Funding: What Will We Do About Our Crumbling Transportation System

Regional Toll Revenue Annual Financial Report

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRYAN DISTRICT T I P

Transportation Finance Overview. Presentation Contents

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

NCDOT Funding Overview

FUNDING AND FINANCE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS STATE FUNDING OPTIONS

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

Public Transportation Advisory Committee. Meeting Handouts January 24, 2019

Public Hearing Tarrant County. April 14, 2009

Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda

OVERVIEW OF STATE DEBT

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

The widening gap between home price and household

RPM Presentation #2. Slide 1:

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Transportation Funding Options

In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities,

Overview of Major Transportation Funding Actions by the 84th Legislature and Selected Alternative Funding Options

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

Prioritization and Programming Process. NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming November 16, 2016

Proposal for SH 121 Toll Project. Monday, May 7, 2007

Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts Performance Audit Division

Transcription:

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE Presentation for Texas Transportation Commission March 28, 2018

Purposes of the Workshop The Texas Transportation Commission is responsible for oversight of Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) in implementing transportation policy on a statewide basis, which impacts over 28 million people throughout the rural and urban areas of Texas. To provide an updated report to the Texas Transportation Commission on TxDOT s focus on the congestion relief initiatives directed by Governor Greg Abbott to the Commission on September 23, 2015, including the Texas Clear Lanes congestion relief initiative. There will be NO ACTION taken on this item today or tomorrow. 2

Governor Abbott s Leadership for New Funding Sources Governor Greg Abbott responded to the Texas voter mandate of Texans who approved Proposition 1 with 80% of the vote, by the Governor directing that transportation funding would be a priority in the 84 th Legislature and calling on the Texas Legislature to: add more than $4 billion a year to build more roads in Texas without raising taxes, fees, tolls or debt. - Governor Greg Abbott February 17, 2015 State of the State 3

The Mandate from Texas Voters for New Funding Sources Ballot Language: The constitutional amendment providing for the use and dedication of certain money transferred to the state highway fund to assist in the completion of transportation construction, maintenance, and rehabilitation projects, not to include toll roads. In 2014, Proposition 1 was overwhelmingly passed by voters with 80 percent of the vote in favor of constitutionally-mandated transportation funding for projects other than toll roads Directs a portion of oil and gas severance tax revenue to the State Highway Fund. In 2015, Proposition 1 generated $1.74 billion and generated $734 million in 2018. 4

The Mandate from Texas Voters for New Funding Sources Ballot Language: The constitutional amendment dedicating certain sales and use tax revenue and motor vehicle sales, use, and rental tax revenue to the state highway fund to provide funding for nontolled roads and the reduction of certain transportation-related debt. In 2015, Proposition 7 was overwhelmingly passed by voters with 83 percent of the vote in favor of constitutionally-mandated transportation funding for projects other than toll roads Directs a portion of the growth of state sales tax and the motor vehicle sales tax to the State Highway Fund. In 2018, it s anticipated to generate $2.3 billion and will grow to $3 billion a year by fiscal year 2021. 5

Ending Diversions In 2015, the 84 th Texas Legislature ended diversions from the State Highway Fund gas tax to increase transportation funding by $650 million per year 6

Governor Abbott s directive to the Texas Transportation Commission The State of Texas is spurring economic development and creating jobs by making an historic investment to build more roads and improve our infrastructure. That's why today I am directing the Texas Transportation Commission to create a focused initiative to identify and address the state's most congested chokepoints and work with transportation planners to get new roads built swiftly and effectively. Governor Greg Abbott, September 23, 2015 On September 24, 2015, Commissioner Bugg was appointed to lead the Texas Transportation Commission s Congestion Relief Initiative. 7

Response to the voter mandate for Non-Tolled Roads for Congestion Relief: Texas Clear Lanes Texas Clear Lanes is a statewide strategic plan to provide congestion relief through non-tolled roads and is focused on Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio. Why these five major metro areas?: Represent more than 65 percent of the Texas population. According to State Demographer Dr. Lloyd Potter, 87 percent of Texans live in counties along I-35 and east of the interstate. Home to 92 of Texas Top 100 chokepoints based on the Nov. 1, 2017, Texas A&M Transportation Institute list: Austin: 13 roadways Dallas: 24 roadways Fort Worth: 7 roadways Houston: 38 roadways San Antonio: 10 roadways In addition to TexasClearLanes, the TxDOT congestion relief initiative includes a statewide congestion relief focus on connectivity and strategic freight/trade corridors outside of the five major metropolitan areas. According to the Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 93 percent of Texans rely on a personal auto as primary means of transportation. Users experience an average 52 annual hours of delay per commuter (2015). According to TRANSEARCH, Texas roads are also carrying 53.7% of the freight tonnage by mode of travel. Visit TexasClearLanes.com to learn more about the progress we have made to date. 8

Population Projections Area Name 2015 2050 Percent change (2015-2050) Austin-Round Rock 1,990,437 5,176,940 160.1% Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 7,117,896 16,367,293 129.9% Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land 6,622,047 14,221,267 114.8% San Antonio-New Braunfels 2,380,005 4,294,232 80.4% Source: Texas Demographic Center 9

Texas Transportation Commission Response to the Voter Mandate Internal taskforce of key TxDOT administration and district staff conduct on-going monthly meetings to review Texas Clear Lanes projects, timelines and funding requirements. The Commission listened to the needs and priorities of local stakeholders in these five metro areas. This effort led to the initial funding, in February 2016, under Texas Clear Lanes of $1.3 billion in non-tolled projects to the five metro areas allocated as follows: *Formula allocation based on Category 2 formulas 10

2018 UTP Funds Distribution Summary of 2018 UTP Funding ($B) Rural Districts* $9.7 Urban Districts* $12.4 Major Metropolitan Districts* $30.3 Statewide and Unallocated $13.0 Category 3 Non-Traditional Funding $5.2 Total $70.6 * 5 Metro, 9 Urban, 11 Rural Districts Source: Wilson Administration Franchise Model 11

Current 2018 Unified Transportation Program Category 10-YR Distribution ($ Billions) Category 1- Maintenance $13.9 Category 2 -Metro and Urban Corridor Funding $12.2 Category 3- Non Traditional $5.2 Category 4 - Connectivity (Regional) $6.3 Category 4 - Connectivity (Congestion) $5.1 Category 5 - CMAQ (3 MPOs) $2.2 Category 6 - Bridge $3.4 Category 7 - Fed STP-MM (Large MPO) $4.3 Category 8 - Safety $3.3 Category 9 - TAP $0.8 Category 10 - Supplemental Transportation Projects $0.7 Category 11 - District Discretionary $1.1 Category 11 - Energy Sector $2.1 Category 12-Strategic Priority $5.1 Category 12-Strategic Priority (TexasClearLanes) $4.9 Total Funds $70.6 *Figures from December 2017 update of the 2018 UTP 12

Current 2018 Unified Transportation Program Congestion Relief Funding Statewide congestion funding for 10 years is $28.9B including the following to each of the five major metros: (UTP Categories 2, part of 4, 5, 7 and 12) Metro Area Funding (billions) Austin $2.0 Dallas $5.3 Fort Worth $2.5 Houston $6.8 San Antonio $2.2 Category 12 Texas Clear Lanes $4.9 Total for 5 metros $23.7 13

Discussion on Funding Top 100 Chokepoints The funding analysis for the Texas 2017 Top 100 Congested Segments ( Top 100 Chokepoints ) being presented today is for discussion purposes only to address public comments received by TxDOT to inform and educate the taxpayers of the State of Texas and promote discussion among Commission members. This funding analysis for the Top 100 Chokepoints does not reflect any policy direction by the Commission for TxDOT to pursue. There will be NO ACTION taken on the funding analysis for the Top 100 Chokepoints in this workshop today or tomorrow. It is for discussion purposes only. 14

Discussion Objectives To address public comments received by TxDOT that funding from Proposition 1 and Proposition 7, which is constitutionally mandated to not be used for toll roads, and, funding from ending diversions (collectively the New Funding Sources ) should be used to fund projects described in the Top 100 Chokepoints Review estimated 10 year revenue from the New Funding Sources Identify 2017 Top 100 Chokepoints Funding analysis for using the New Funding Sources to apply to Top 100 Chokepoints by ranking Discuss implications of this funding analysis to apply the New Funding Sources to the Top 100 Chokepoints on the Texas Transportation Commission s responsibility for transportation policy throughout the State of Texas, addressing both rural and urban transportation needs 15

Addressing Public Comments Regarding Use of New Funding Sources for Top 100 Chokepoints This portion of today s discussion is to address public comments received by TxDOT by letter from over 200 individuals as signatories that: 1) The vast majority of the New Funding Sources did not get allocated to the Top 100 Chokepoints. 2) Instead, the New Funding Sources were used on construction projects throughout Texas other than the Top 100 Chokepoints. 3) TxDOT should prioritize and direct New Funding Sources to the Top 100 Chokepoints. 16

Estimated 10 Year Revenue from Proposition 1, Proposition 7, and Ending Diversions for Non-Tolled Construction 2018 UTP Funding Source Funding Amount ($B) Proposition 1* $ 6.5 Proposition 7 $ 23.7 Ending Diversions $ 5.2 Estimated Total New Funding Sources $35.4 *Assumes legislative continuation of Proposition 1 beyond current Sunset date of 2025 17

Estimated Construction Costs to Address Top 100 Congested Segments By District Estimated Construction Cost* ($M) Rank Range Austin Dallas Fort Worth Houston San Antonio El Paso Tyler Bryan Corpus Christi Laredo Pharr Totals 1-25 $5,060 $8,762 $700 $12,169 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,691 26-50 $1,913 $1,400 $350 $2,483 $4,601 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,747 51-75 $1,420 $2,091 $90 $1,085 $1,685 $80 $110 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,561 76-100 $0 $1,235 $851 $1,901 $12 $325 $0 $225 $40 $77 $17 $4,683 1-100 $8,393 $13,488 $1,991 $17,638 $6,298 $405 $110 $225 $40 $77 $17 $48,682 *Estimated project costs may reflect preliminary assumptions for planning purposes. Final project costs will vary based on future environmental study and project engineering. 18

Hypothetical 10-yr Program Hypothetical 2018 UTP New Funding Sources for Top 100 Chokepoints Remaining Funds for 10-Yr UTP for State of Texas Funding Amount ($B) $ 35.4 $ 30.0 Total Allocated Funds $65.4 Non-Traditional Funds (Cat 3 & Fed Earmarks) $ 5.2 Total All Funds $70.6 19

On-System Highway Lane Miles in Texas Rural Districts Miles 79,552 Urban Districts Miles 65,705 Major Metropolitan Districts Miles 50,871 Total Statewide Miles 196,128 20

Considerations Widespread support for Propositions 1 and 7 Proposition 1: won majority in 253 of 254 counties and more than 75% or more of vote in all but 21 counties Proposition 7: won majority in all 254 Texas counties and more than 75% or more of vote in all but 3 counties IF New Funding Sources were used exclusively on Top 100 Chokepoints, it is predicted the Congestion measure would improve from projected levels while all others would worsen. Working with Texas Transportation Institute, conservative economic benefits using the current investment strategy would yield a present value of $186 billion over a 30-year benefit stream. 21

Considerations - continued Early* Legislative direction on use of Proposition 1 was for: Mobility and added capacity projects in urban areas to decrease congestion and increase the safe and efficient movement of traffic Projects that improve regional connectivity along strategic corridors in rural areas of the state Statewide maintenance and preservation projects Roadway safety and maintenance projects in areas of the state impacted by increased oil and gas production activity * Since 2018 use of Proposition 1 funds has been left to the Commission 22

Top 100 Chokepoints Addressed by Projects Let From Fiscal Year 2015 to Present Rank(s) Addressed Hwy District Cost ($M) Notes 2 IH 35 Austin $ 166 Projects let in 2016 6 IH 35E Dallas $ 121 Projects let in 2017 23 US 281 San Antonio $ 192 Let in 2017 26 IH35E/US67/US67 Dallas $ 660 DB Contract signed in 2017 27 IH 610/IH 69 Interchange Houston $ 259 Let in 2017 32 IH 635 Dallas $ 5 Projects let in 2015 and 2017 40 Airport Fwy / SH 183 Dallas $ 865 DB Contract signed in FY 2015 41 SH 288 Houston $ 816 DB Contract signed in 2016 47 E IH 820 Fort Worth $ 174 Let in 2017 48 Connally Loop NW / IH 410 San Antonio $ 82 Let in 2015 48* SH 121 Fort Worth $ 61 Let in 2016 52, 78, 93 IH30/SH360 Interchange Ft Worth $ 233 Let in 2015 52 SH 360 Ft Worth $ 54 Let in 2018 * Rank from earlier year 76 SH 48 Pharr $ 209 Let in 2018 Total $3,897 23

Report to the Texas Voters Since January 2015, TxDOT has issued construction contracts for 2,874 non-tolled projects, totaling over $14.8 billion. 1,474 non-tolled projects worth $15.6 billion are under construction. 2,220 non-tolled projects worth $10 billion have been completed and opened to Texas drivers since January 2015. 24

Putting Dollars to Work Today, I am directing TxDOT Senior Staff to develop a plan for Commission review, to apply substantially more of the new funding sources on the Top 100 congested roads to determine how funding can be allocated to address these worst chokepoints. If funding streams are insufficient for additional highway capacity that is needed by our growing population, the source of any new funding streams is a policy decision not for this Commission, but for our State Leaders and the Texas Legislature. While we can all agree that funding sources that allow for free general purpose lanes, or a pay as you go system is what Texas historically has relied upon has been our traditional funding source, THIS COMMISSION S RESPONSIBILITY IS TO PLAN FOR THE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF TEXAS TODAY, AND THE FUTURE OF TEXAS IN DOING SO, WE ARE INDIFFERENT ABOUT THE SOURCES OF FUNDING STREAMS, BUT NOT INDIFFERENT TO OUR COMMITMENT TO BUILDING NEW ROADS TO MEET OUR MANDATE FROM THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS TO ADDRESS TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF TEXAS. This Commission will continue to execute, as we have in the past, to deploy all available funding sources to build new roads to meet the needs of all Texans. - J. Bruce Bugg, Jr., Chairman Texas Transportation Commission Meeting December 17, 2017 25