Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, ID No. 1. Water Rates & Finances. December 13, 2016

Similar documents
Water Rate Study FINAL January 31, 2018

July 1, Tier Percent of Allocation Cost per ccf $0.91 $1.27 $2.86 $4.80 $ % % % % 201+%

Santa Clarita Water Division

Water Rates Adjustments Phase 2

La Cañada Irrigation District

3.1. Construction Meter Additional Charges for Temporary Meters OTHER FEES, CHARGES, AND DEPOSITS CAPACITY FEES...

Town of Hillsborough. City Council Public Hearing. Water Rate Cost-of-Service Study. February 13, 2017

Notice of a public hearing

Goleta Water District

BODEGA BAY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT Water and Wastewater Rate Study

Water Consultancy. Montecito Sanitary District Wastewater Rate Study Report. Montecito Sanitary District

Study Workshops are designed to be both educational and to seek broad direction from the Board

Final COST OF SERVICE STUDY SEPTEMBER City of San Clemente

WATER USER RATES & FEE STUDY

STAFF REPORT. ITEM NO. 4 MEETING DATE: March 7, 2017 MEETING: Board of Directors SUBJECT:

WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY

Council Bill No WATER RATES General Ordinance 6318 Sheet No. 3 (Page 1 of 6)

Rainbow Municipal Water District

Meeting & Outreach efforts

Water Rates Rate Restructure and Rate Adjustments

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE AND FEE STUDY FINAL REPORT. September 2013

The City of Sierra Madre

Water Rate Study for City of Lemoore

WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES RATE STUDY

SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM (SAWS) RATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: MEETING 3

Richard Pearson, Community Development Director Tim Tucker, City Engineer

City of San Carlos Sewer Financial Plan & Rate Update

SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

CITY OF CALISTOGA WATER RATE STUDY FINAL REPORT

Sonoma County Service Area #41(CSA #41) Water Rate Study

Water Connections Guidelines & Application October 2017

City of Benicia. Rate Study Update: Water & Wastewater Rates

City of Riverbank. Water Rate Study FINAL 6/18/2015

Valencia Water Company. Cost of Service Study

WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY

Agenda Rio Linda / Elverta Community Water District Planning Committee

WATER RATE AND FINANCIAL POLICY TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER DIVISION

April 6, Katherine Godbey Director of Finance, Coachella Valley Water District Hovley Lane East Palm Desert, CA 92260

Maurice Kaufman, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Bartle Wells Associates DATE: September 7, 2016 MEMORANDUM

Water & Sewer Rate Study. Water & Sewer Cost of Service Rate Study. City of Norco, CA. Draft Report for

Water and Sewer Utility Rate Studies

Water Rate Study Final Report

THIS ANNUAL REPORT IS INTENDED TO COMPLY WITH THE AUTHORITY S LIMITED OBLIGATIONS UNDER RULE 15C1-12. THIS ANNUAL REPORT SPEAKS ONLY AS OF

FY 2016/17 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT

Utility Rates. October 13, 2015

SANTA MONICA RENT CONTROL BOARD ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM

VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICTS Representing: Ventura County Waterworks Districts No. 1, 16, 17 & 19

Table 2-2 Projected Water Production and Costs

YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT

Comprehensive Rate Study & Cost Allocation Analysis. Public Workshop December 4, 2017

CITY OF ANN ARBOR WATER & SEWER COST OF SERVICE STUDY

City of Napa Modification of Water Rates. September, City of Napa Water Rates. Service Area. >75,000 customers. 25,000 connections

Public Hearing on Water and Sewer Rates. September 20, 2017

City of Fridley Water and Sewer Rate Study. Jessica Cook 9/25/17

Temescal Valley Water District

RATE INFORMATION. A. The rates adopted by the Authority will be in accordance with of the Code of Virginia, as amended.

Administrative and Finance Committee June 23, 2011

WHEREAS, the rates of the Proposed Ordinance take into account the cost of service study recently completed by LADWP; and

Comprehensive Water Rate Study

2016 Water and Recycled Water Rate Study PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 12, 2016

2019 CITRUS HEIGHTS WATER DISTRICT BUDGET, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) AND RATE PRESENTATION

Metropolitan Water District s 2010/11 Proposed Rates and Charges. Imported Water Committee January 28, 2010

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ WATER DEPARTMENT LONG RANGE FINANCIAL PLAN

Water and Wastewater Utility Rates

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED NEW/INCREASED WATER RATES

Alameda County Water District. Financial Workshop Proposed Rates & Charges

Title 6 WATER AND SEWER FEES AND CHARGES

LONG BEACH WATER DEPARTMENT COST OF SERVICE AND RATE STUDY

2017 WATER, RECYCLED WATER, AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY REPORT

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT OCTOBER 7, 2009

County Of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH. Water Rate Cost-of-Service Study

1. Accept staff report on the updated study of cost of service to provide potable water to San Jose Municipal Water System (SJMWS) customers; and

General Provisions (CY 12-mo Components)

Consideration of Adjustments to the San Dieguito Water District' s Water Rates and Meter

COST OF SERVICE AND RATE STRUCTURE STUDY

Frequently Asked Questions from Claremont Customers

THIS ANNUAL REPORT IS INTENDED TO COMPLY WITH THE AUTHORITY S LIMITED OBLIGATIONS UNDER RULE 15C1-12. THIS ANNUAL REPORT SPEAKS ONLY AS OF

NALDRAFT SEPTEMBER2015 WASTEWATE

Sewer Rate Study July 2016

Long-Term Financial Stability Workshop #4. Capital Investment & Financing. Board of Directors September 23, 2014

PREFERRED FINANCIAL PLAN SCENARIO & WATER RATE DESIGN ALTERNATIVE

CITY OF CITY OF SONOMA FULLERTON. Pricing Objectives Discussion Water Rate Study 2018 Water Rate Study

RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT

Stakeholder Advisory Group

RESOLUTION CONNECTION CHARGES, PLANT INVESTMENT FEES, AND UTILITY RATES FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE

Unfunded Pension Liability Accelerated Funding Options

MONROE CITY COUNCIL. Agenda Bill No

CITY OF REDLANDS WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY. Prepared by:

WATER VALIDATION, COST OF SERVICE & RATE DESIGN ANALYSIS WASTEWATER VALIDATION & RATE ANALYSIS MISCELLANEOUS FEES & OVERHEAD RATE ANALYSIS

MONTECITO WATER DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 BUDGET

West Valley Sanitation District FINANCIAL PLAN & RATE STUDY. January 2018

Defining a Resilient Business Model for Water Utilities

Phase 1: Water Budget Based Rate Structure Feasibility Analysis

Note: Letter has been updated to reflect changes to proposed rates as ordered by the Board of Directors.

Surcharges and Surcredits

City of Signal Hill Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENTION TO AMEND SIGNAL HILL

Hamilton County, Ohio The Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati Rate Structure and Comparisons. October 21, 2015

11/16/ November 16, 2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council. THROUGH: Municipal Services Committee (November 10, 2015) FROM:

FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT

Transcription:

Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, ID No. 1 Water Rates & Finances December 13, 2016

Presentation Overview Objectives & Process District Finances Current & Projected Rates 2

Rate Study Objectives Independent review of District finances and rates Developed long-term financial projections to: Determine annual revenue requirements Evaluate financial scenarios & rate increase alternatives Proposed water rates designed to: Restore and maintain financial health Provide adequate funding for operating and capital needs Be fair and equitable to all customer classes Comply with the legal requirements of Proposition 218 3

Rate Study Process 2015 Initiate Rate Study Sept 15 Board Meeting, preliminary findings & intro to rate study 2016 Develop Rate Recommendations Jan 6 Oct 17 Oct 18 Oct 25 Oct 27 Dec 13 Board/Public Workshop, discuss findings & obtain input Public Workshop, present recommendations & obtain input Board Meeting, receive direction to move forward Board Meeting accepting and approving the Water Rate Study Mailed Prop 218 Notices (min. 45 days prior to hearing) Public Rate Hearing, consider rate increases 2017 Rates Become Effective 4 Feb 1 New rates become effective

5 DISTRICT FINANCES

Background District historically maintained good financial health with steady gradual rate increases each year Financial health has deteriorated Tax assessments suspended after 2010/11 for 5 years (rev loss = $3.75M) California hit with severe drought Cutback in water sales resulted in substantial revenue loss District operating in deficit mode for third year in a row, even with cutbacks in operations and deferred maintenance Stringent new Chromium 6 drinking water regulations took effect July 2014 District facing financial challenges that will require rate increases 6

7

Financial Challenges Eliminate budget deficits & restore financial stability Almost $1M deficit projected in current fiscal year (without rate increases) Chromium 6 project to address new regulations Capital costs: $8.5M to $12.7M (requires debt financing) Future O&M costs: $500,000 per year Maintenance & rehab/replacement of aging infrastructure Future capital investment projected at $500,000 per year Reduced water consumption = reduced revenues Water usage down almost 33% from 2013 benchmark year to 2015/16 Customer who are conserving have reduced their water bills Wholesale water supply costs increasing Need to comply with bond covenants (legal obligation) Ongoing operating cost inflation 8

Projected Rate Revenue Increases Projected overall level of rate increases Target level of rate increases excluding impact of changes in water sales Feb-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Overall Rate Increases 15% 15% 5% 5% 5% Rate increases phased in as gradually as possible District can re-evaluate need for rate increases each year Rate impacts will vary by customer class due to rate structure modifications 9

10 CURRENT WATER RATES

CURRENT WATER RATES MONTHLY METER CHARGES Meter Size Domestic, RR/Ltd Ag Agricultural 5/8" $38.78-3/4" 46.42-1" 76.98-1-1/2" 153.62 62.40 2" 243.80 103.14 3" 490.60 207.56 4" 661.91 289.06 6" 1,543.43 645.61 8" 2,455.55 - CONSUMPTION CHARGES ($/hcf) Domestic $3.81 Rural Residential/Limited Agriculture First 125 units 3.81 Over 125 units 1.31 Agriculture (No Domestic Use) 0.50 On-Demand 6.08 Temporary 6.25 Cachuma Park 1.38 Domestic rates in middle range of regional agencies Agricultural rates are lowest in region Fixed meter charges generate about 45% of total rate revenues Rate increases in recent years were largely offset by decline in water sales $0.51 per 100 gallons $0.18 per 100 gallons $0.07 per 100 gallons 11

12

13

14

Agricultural Rate Survey 15 Agency Ag Fixed Meter Charges Consumption Charges ($/hcf) SYRWCD ID#1 2" $103.14 Ag $0.50 (Ag Rates) 4" 289.06 Limited Ag 1.31 6" 645.61 Carpenteria VWD 2" 228.40 Irrigation 4" 713.75 Tier 1 (standard demand) 1.91 6" 1,427.50 Tier 2 2.50 Surcharge 345.00 (+ 0.26 to 0.44 in pressure zones) Montecito WD 2" 237.84 Ag <870 hcf/acre/year 3.00 4" 891.90 Ag >870 hcf/acre/year 5.40 6" 1,468.51 Santa Barbara 2" 164.03 Ag 3.42 4" 409.28 Over Budget 24.27 6" 819.79 Nipomo CSD 2" 128.42 Ag 3.41 4" 385.16 Supplemental Chg 1.00 6" 762.43 Total 4.41 Goleta WD 2" 204.82 Ag 1.86 4" 779.95 Drought Surcharge 2.68 6" 1,722.21 Total 4.54

16 PROPOSED RATES

Fixed Meter Charge Modifications Small inflationary increases to fixed meter charges No change to fixed meter charges in first year Meter charges re-aligned with meter capacity Domestic meter charges Base 5/8-inch meter charge increases roughly 14% over 5 years Impacts on most other meter sizes vary from 14% to 16% over next 5 years Ag meter charges Remain substantially lower than domestic meter charges Lower cost water supply (no Dept of Water Resources supply) Fewer accounts, less admin cost per account Interruptible supply Assumes ag customers pay 50% of standard rate during periods offline Private fire service charges set at 10% of domestic meter charges 17

Monthly Meter Charges Proposed Water Rates Meter Current Proposed Rates Effective on or After Number of Meter Capacity Water Feb-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Accounts Capacity Ratio Rates 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MONTHLY METER CHARGES Domestic, Commercial & Rural Res/Ltd Agriculture Meter Size 5/8" 780 25 1.0 $38.78 $38.78 $39.86 $41.40 $42.98 $44.19 3/4" 616 30 1.2 46.42 46.42 47.83 49.68 51.57 53.03 1" 592 50 2.0 76.98 76.98 79.72 82.80 85.96 88.38 1-1/2" 194 100 4.0 153.62 153.62 159.44 165.60 171.91 176.76 2" 229 160 6.4 243.80 243.80 255.10 264.97 275.06 282.82 3" 8 300 12.0 490.60 490.60 478.31 496.81 515.73 530.29 4" 1 500 20.0 691.91 691.91 797.18 828.02 859.56 883.81 6" 0 1,000 40.0 1,543.43 1,543.43 1,594.36 1,656.04 1,719.12 1,767.62 8" 0 1,600 64.0 2,455.55 2,455.55 2,550.98 2,649.66 2,750.59 2,828.19 18 Agricultural Meter Size 1-1/2" 3 100 4.0 $62.40 $62.40 $66.16 $68.72 $71.34 $73.35 2" 29 160 6.4 103.14 103.14 105.86 109.96 114.15 117.37 3" 5 300 12.0 207.56 207.56 209.71 211.87 214.02 220.06 4" 47 500 20.0 289.06 289.06 330.82 343.62 356.71 366.77 6" 27 1,000 40.0 645.61 645.61 661.64 687.24 713.41 733.54

Consumption Charge Modifications Domestic Water Rate Increases from $3.81 to $5.15 per hcf over next 5 years (approx. 35% increase) Larger increases in first 2 years to help eliminate budget deficit & restore stability Ag Water Rate Increase from $0.50 (below cost of water supply) to $1.87 per hcf over next 5 years Lower cost water supply (e.g. no Dept of Water Resources supply), however cost of USBR ag water supply is increasing Interruptible supply Ag rate to remain lowest compared to other regional agencies Limited Ag Water Rate Set at 25% Domestic rate and 75% Ag rate Supposed to be for commercial agriculture Some large lot properties benefitting by getting lower Limited Ag Rate for non-ag uses 19

Consumption Charge Modifications 20 On-Demand Water Rate 2x standard Domestic Rate includes partial cost recovery for system capacity Have own local service areas and require access to District water on demand to supplement local supplies (typically during periods of peak demand) District incurs substantial costs maintaining the operational and water supply capacity to serve these accounts, yet only minimal cost recovery due to low water sales Pay a fixed meter charge based on master meter connection, which does not fully reflect underlying demand Never paid an equitable capacity charge to buy in to District facilities like other customers Alternative: levy a reduced fixed monthly service charge on each parcel Temporary Water Rate 3x standard Domestic Rate Includes cost recovery for District infrastructure and water supply Cachuma Park Receives untreated water directly from Lake Cachuma

Water Consumption Charges CONSUMPTION CHARGES Charge per hundred cubic feet (hcf) of metered water consumption. Current Proposed Rates Effective on or After Water Feb-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Jan-1 Rates 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Domestic (Residential & Commercial) $3.81 $4.30 $4.80 $4.95 $5.05 $5.15 Rural Residential/Limited Agriculture First 125 units 3.81 4.30 4.80 4.95 5.05 5.15 Over 125 units 1.31 1.65 1.98 2.22 2.46 2.69 Agriculture (No Domestic Use) 0.50 0.77 1.04 1.31 1.59 1.87 On-Demand (2x Domestic Rate) 6.08 8.60 9.60 9.90 10.10 10.30 Temporary (3x Domestic Rate) 6.25 12.90 14.40 14.85 15.15 15.46 Cachuma Park 1.38 1.48 1.55 1.63 1.71 1.80 Note: One hundred cubic feet (hcf) = 748 gallons Proposed Water Rates 21

22

23 Average Annual Increase Since 2010 Ranges from 2.4% to 3.4%

Conclusion 24 District facing a number of financial challenges Revenue shortfalls for three consecutive years Declining reserve funds for five years State of California Mandates Chromium 6 Increased Costs of Providing Service Near and long-term costs of water purchases Deferring Maintenance and Improvement Projects Rate increases needed Eliminate Budget deficit Restore Financial Stability Maintain Credit Rating Meet Debt Obligations Continue Operations Purchases and Production of Water supplies Fund Maintenance and Capital Projects

25