blend Funding plc Update to credit analysis Credit strengths » Liquidity reserve as structural enhancement Credit challenges

Similar documents
OECD Workshop on Data Collection

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Mongolian Banking System

Findlay City School District, OH

PSP Capital Inc. Update to credit analysis. CREDIT OPINION 27 August Update

Volusia County School District (FL)

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

Orbit Group Limited (United Kingdom)

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Ratings to three Sri Lankan banks 18 Jun 2018

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

CPPIB Capital Inc. Semiannual Update. Credit Strengths. Credit Challenges. Rating Outlook The rating outlook is stable.

Barcelona, City of. Annual update. Barcelona's good operating performance. B= Budget. PC: Pre-closing. Source: Issuer. Moody's Investors Service.

The Basque Country (Spain)

Regional Economic Outlook

Ag Lending Experience of Living Through the Cycles

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Rating Action: Moody's reviews NORD/LB Luxembourg S.A. - Public-Sector Covered Bonds, direction uncertain 19 Dec 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Rating to FCA Bank

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Kommunalkredit Austria AG's public-sector covered bonds Global Credit Research - 25 Jul 2017

Credit Opinion: Credit Suisse International

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, IL

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Baa3 senior unsecured debt ratings of ICICI Bank's Bahrain branch Global Credit Research - 17 Aug 2017

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Agence Centrale Organismes Securite Sociale

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Q1 2018: Higher impairment offset revenue growth. ISSUER COMMENT 16 May Summary opinion

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Rating Action: Moody's reviews Depfa ACS Bank's public sector covered bonds for downgrade Global Credit Research - 14 Sep 2016

Rating Action: Moody's changes outlook of Central Bank of India and Indian Overseas Bank to positive from stable

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Bharti's senior unsecured notes to Ba1 and assigns a Ba1 CFR; outlook negative 05 Feb 2019

Rating Action: Moody's announces rating actions on student loan ABS backed by FFELP student loans following the update of its rating methodology

3i Group plc. Update following the publication of first-half 2018 financial results. CREDIT OPINION 28 November Update

PT Indosat Tbk. Strong Revenue and Earnings Growth in FY2015 Supports Credit Profile. ISSUER COMMENT 28 March 2016

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Permanent tsb's deposit and senior unsecured ratings; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 08 May 2015

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

CIMIC GROUP UPGRADED TO Baa2, OUTLOOK STABLE, BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Credit Opinion: Municipal Guarantee Board

Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

Rating Action: Moody's changes the outlook on FCA Bank's senior debt rating to positive from stable

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3/Prime-1 issuer ratings to the Departement de L'Eure; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 07 Apr 2016

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades several Irish mortgage covered bond ratings; actions conclude review

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

Auckland Housing Affordability Remains Poor Despite Improvement

Rating Action: Moody's affirms 22 German banks' senior unsecured debt ratings; changes 16 outlooks to negative

Agence Centrale des Organismes de Sécurité Sociale

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades mortgage covered bonds issued by AIB Mortgage Bank and EBS Mortgage Finance Global Credit Research - 29 Nov 2016

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aaa IFS rating of New York Life; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Jul 2017

Rating Action: Moody's affirms JAB Holding's Baa1 Issuer rating; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 30 Jan 2018

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Lubbock (City of), TX

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Suriname's issuer rating to B2 negative; concluding rating review Global Credit Research - 20 Feb 2018

Policy on Conflict of Interest Certification

Rating Action: Moody's takes rating actions on Irish mortgage covered bonds Global Credit Research - 26 Sep 2016

Rating Action: Moody's affirms AIIB's Aaa rating; outlook stable 28 Mar 2019

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Yanlord to Ba2; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 25 Apr 2017

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A3 issuer rating to Nidec Corporation; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 31 Jan 2018

Butler (Village of), WI

Rating Action: Moody's changes Colonial's outlook to negative from stable following tender offer for Axiare Global Credit Research - 14 Nov 2017

Columbia School District, MO

Federal Home Loan Banks

Policy for Analyst Rotation

Rating Action: Moody's reviews covered bonds issued by Hypo NOE, Hypo Tirol and Heta AR for upgrade Global Credit Research - 25 May 2016

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to San Francisco Airport Commission, CA Series 2018B-G; outlook is stable 01 May 2018

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades senior unsecured debt instruments of 14 German banks following change in bank insolvency law

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Edison (Township of) NJ

Rating Action: Moody's assigns definitive ratings to Lloyds' non-ring-fenced banks LBCM and LBIL

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Intrum Justitia's Ba2 corporate family rating; outlook changed to stable Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Credit Suisse International

business cultures. LIQUIDITY PROFILE Moody's considers Lafarge's liquidity profile on a stand-alone basis to be good for the next 12 months, largely

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades the ratings of Philippine National Bank and Rizal Commercial Bank Global Credit Research - 23 Nov 2017

Rating Action: Moody's changes outlook on Bank Zachodni WBK S.A.'s ratings to positive Global Credit Research - 29 Jan 2018

Autobahnen-Und Schnellstrassen Finanzierungs

Credit Suisse International

Challenging Issues and Alternative Approaches to CRE Credit Risk Modeling. RPC Conference, Scottsdale

Rating Action: Moody's Changes Sparebanken Vest's Rating Outlook to Stable From Negative

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades MS Amlin's IFS ratings to A1; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 08 Aug 2017

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Gasunie to A1 from A2; stable outlook 08 Aug 2018

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades NORD/LB's Fuerstenberg preference shares to Caa1(hyb) Global Credit Research - 18 Apr 2018

The Role of Governance and Management in Assessing Municipal Credit Quality

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

For personal use only

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION 19 October 2018 RATINGS blend Funding plc Domicile Long Term Rating Type Outlook United Kingdom A2 Senior Secured - Dom Curr Stable Please see the ratings section at the end of this report for more information. The ratings and outlook shown reflect information as of the publication date. Contacts Zoe Jankel +44.20.7772.1031 VP-Senior Analyst zoe.jankel@moodys.com Sebastien Hay +34.91.768.8222 Senior Vice President/Manager sebastien.hay@moodys.com Joe Griffin +44.207.772.1098 Associate Analyst joe.griffin@moodys.com CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 blend Funding plc Update to credit analysis Summary The credit profile of blend Funding plc blend (A2 stable) reflects the credit quality of the underlying pool participants and the structural enhancement to the pool. blend was established in 2018 by The Housing Finance Corporation Limited (THFC) as a debt aggregator for UK housing associations. The main drivers of blend's long-term senior secured debt rating are (1) our assessment of the strong credit quality of the two participating housing associations and (2) the liquidity reserve which provides blend with 12 months of interest payments sized for each participant, in the case of payment default by a borrower. The pool size is small with only two participants after the recent merger of two of the initial three participants, which means that the rating on the entity is very sensitive to changes in the ratings of underlying borrowers. For each issuance by blend, the individual borrowers are only responsible for the repayment of their individual share of that issue, and the liquidity reserve is held on a several basis for each borrower. There is no provision obliging pool participants to make up the funding shortfall or refill the liquidity reserve in the event of a funding deficiency. All noteholders are secured on a pari-passu basis on all of blend's assets, and there is a cross-default mechanism after an event of default on any of blend's indebtedness, meaning noteholders are exposed to the credit quality of the entire pool. Credit strengths» Strong credit quality of participating housing associations and supportive institutional framework» Liquidity reserve as structural enhancement» Significant sector experience of management team, mitigating start-up risk Credit challenges» Limited reserves of the Issuer» Start-up nature of organisation» Concentration risk in initial pool Rating outlook blend Funding's rating outlook is stable, reflecting Moody's expectation of the continued strong financial performance of the two pool participants, and the stable outlook on the housing association sector.

Factors that could lead to an upgrade Upward pressure on the rating could result from one or a combination of the following: (1) an improvement in the credit quality of one or more of the underlying pool participants, (2) an addition of pool participants with stronger credit quality, and adjustments in the proportion of borrowing between pool participants that results in a stronger borrowing pool. Factors that could lead to a downgrade Downward pressure on the rating could result from one or a combination of the following: (1) an erosion of the credit quality of one or more of the underlying pool participants, (2) a different pool composition, including the addition or removal of pool participants, and adjustments in the proportion of borrowing between pool participants that results in a weaker borrowing pool. Detailed credit considerations Strong credit quality of participating housing associations and supportive institutional framework The credit quality of blend reflects the credit quality of the pool participants, two UK housing associations. Two of the original participants in the pool have recently completed a merger on 1st October 2018. We consider that the credit quality of the merged entity will be maintained at the higher of the two standalone entities due to strong financial performance, strengthened liquidity, and a moderate risk appetite towards market sales in its development programme. Moody's ratings in the sector span from A1 to Baa2. UK housing associations operate within a strong regulatory framework with regular monitoring and oversight by the sector regulators. We consider the operating environment to be stable in the medium term with recent policy announcements on rent increases from 2020 and new capital grant availability reversing previous adverse policies in England. Housing associations also benefit from a strong level of extraordinary support, reflecting the wide-ranging powers of redress available to sector regulators in cases of financial distress, with the possibility of a facilitated merger or a transfer of engagements. Recent history has shown that the UK government (Aa2 stable) is willing to support the sector, as social housing remains a politically and economically sensitive issue. blend will be secured by way of a fixed charge over the borrowers' assets. It should be noted that we consider security in the sector to have limited credit uplift. In addition, on 5th July 2018, The Housing Administration (England and Wales) Rules 2018 came into effect, implementing the special administration regime in England for registered providers of social housing, introduced in The Housing and Planning Act 2016. If a housing administration order has been made over a housing association at risk of insolvency, creditors cannot appoint their own administrators or enforce their security, or influence the Housing Administrator's proposals during the administration period. Liquidity reserve as a structural enhancement blend's credit quality will benefit from the structural enhancement of a liquidity reserve fund, held in trust by blend. The liquidity reserve will be equivalent to one year's interest payments, sized for each borrower. There is no step-up provision for any borrower to replenish another borrower's liquidity reserve, if there is a need for blend to draw down on any of the individual liquidity reserves in the case of missed coupon payments on loans. The initial liquidity reserve will be funded by a retention from disbursement of the loan proceeds prior to the first advance of funds. Coupon payments on the underlying loans will be due one month in advance of coupon payments on the Notes, in order to provide sufficient time for the borrower to make good its missed payment, or for the Issuer to access the borrower's liquidity reserve. In addition, underlying loans will have a contractual maturity date of the Expected Maturity Date of the Notes, which will be two years prior to the Legal or Final Maturity Date of the Notes, which in theory would enable more time for the borrower to re-finance before a default on the Notes. However, in practice if a borrower was in default at the Expected Maturity Date, then interest payments would continue to be due between the Expected Maturity Date and Legal Maturity Date and the liquidity reserve would only provide for one year's interest payments before a Note default. Significant sector experience of management team This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2 19 October 2018 blend Funding plc: Update to credit analysis

blend is a 100% subsidiary of The Housing Finance Corporation. The two entities will share Boards (with the exception of one nonexecutive director), codes of governance and audit committees. The Housing Finance Corporation - through its management services subsidiary - will provide management services to blend. The Housing Finance Corporation has considerable experience in the provision of finance to the housing association sector. It was established 31 years ago and currently provides finance to 145 separate housing association groups, and, amongst other programmes, runs the Affordable Housing Finance scheme as the exclusive delivery partner of the UK Government-backed Affordable Housing Guarantee Scheme which includes some 3.2 billion of issued debt. The Housing Finance Corporation is therefore well placed to operate, govern and manage the activities of blend. Limited reserves of the Issuer The issuer will be funded by an annual management fee to underlying borrowers, in addition to an arrangement fee on inception of the loan. However, it is not expected that the Issuer will build up a significant level of reserves itself and therefore would have a limited cash buffer - in addition to the liquidity reserve - in the case of payment defaults by underlying borrowers. Start-up nature of the organisation blend is confronted with the general risks of start-ups, including operations not gaining traction in the sector. However, this risk is mitigated by the experience of the management team. In addition, we consider that if blend was to be put in run-off very quickly after its inception (for example, if its business model turns out to be non-viable), it would be able to honour its commitments using loan proceeds, which will be matched with any debt issued. Concentration risk in initial pool There are currently only two participants in the pool, post the merger of two of the original pool participants on 1st October 2018. This means that the initial pool is very small and presents some concentration risk. In particular, the credit profiles of pool financings are sensitive to both the proportion of borrowing between pool participants and the ratings of individual pool participants. This sensitivity increases as the number of pool participants diminishes. This means that a change in borrowing amount and/or a change in rating for one participant has a significant probability of affecting the final rating of the pool. Rating methodology and scorecard factors Public Sector Pool Financings, July 2012 (143938) Ratings Exhibit 1 Category BLEND FUNDING PLC Outlook Senior Secured -Dom Curr Source: Moody's Investors Service Moody's Rating Stable A2 3 19 October 2018 blend Funding plc: Update to credit analysis

Moody s Public Sector Europe is the trading name of Moody s Investors Service EMEA Limited, a company incorporated in England with registered number 8922701 that operates as part of the Moody s Investors Service division of the Moody s group of companies. 2018 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 1144506 4 19 October 2018 blend Funding plc: Update to credit analysis

CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 5 19 October 2018 blend Funding plc: Update to credit analysis