Example: Calculating the School Wide Composite Performance Index (CPI) Target for SY

Similar documents
DRAFT Bond & Mill Levy Planning. Mill Levy CPAC Kick-off. Denver Public Schools. February 29, 2012

University Hgts. Elem. School School Report Card Bowling Lane Jonesboro, AR

BY: Teresa Hyden Cynthia Glover Woods Chief Business Official Chief Academic Officer (951) (951)

Staying On Track with Growth-to-Standards for English Learner Students. Joni Lakin, Ph.D. Auburn University

Performance Funding Metrics Model

PARK HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT INFORMATIONAL SECTION

Process. Board of County Commissioners. March 27, 2012

Ohio Linking Study A Study of the Alignment of the NWEA RIT Scale with Ohio s Graduation Test (OGT)*

DEGREE NAVIGATOR 6 STUDENT TUTORIAL

Understanding the K-12 General Education Funding Program

Number of Classroom Sections: SY Actual SY Actual SY Actual SY Actual SY Projected Grade Grade

WASHINGTON LINKING STUDY

Part 1. Demographics, Socioeconomics, Community Safety

of 5. Non-Instructional/Business Operations BUDGET PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Detroit Community Schools (82925) Annual Education Report For Detroit Community Elementary and Middle School (k-8) And Detroit Community High School

MASTER SCHEDULING GUIDE TO CREATING CREDIT RECOVERY SECTIONS IN PERIODS 50-75

Issue Paper: Equalization

Irvine Unified School District

NEVADA LINKING STUDY COPYRIGHT 2011 NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION

10. DOES THE SCHOOL CONTRACT WITH A CHARTER OR EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION?

How to Generate an Academic Progress Report (APR) in CalCentral L&S UGRD

Early Retirement Incentives and Student Achievement. Maria D. Fitzpatrick and Michael F. Lovenheim. Online Appendix

Chapter 70 Aid. FY14 Budget 7/12/2013

Guide to Appointment Reasons and Comments

HB 3, Section

Ohio School Funding Overview for Fiscal Years 2016 and 2017

Economic Development Financial Analysis

NEW YORK LINKING STUDY

Illinois LINKING STUDY

Budget Development Update. December 18, 2018

MICHIGAN LINKING STUDY

2018 Economic Indicators Report

Demystifying the Chapter 70 Formula: How the Massachusetts Education Funding System Works

FY18-19 School Funding Overview. FY16-17 Funding Formula

OHIO LINKING STUDY. A Study of the Alignment of the NWEA RIT Scale with the Ohio Achievement Assessment (OAA) December 2012

Massachusetts LINKING STUDY

7.020 Cash Balance June 30 3,709,735 4,692,492 5,469, % 5,455,806 5,183,533 4,810,736 4,205,146 3,345,106

Monitoring Report R: Providing Secure and Stable Resources February 2013

2017 Regional Indicators Summary

Superintendent s Proposed Budget Recommendation

CONNECTICUT LINKING STUDY

Unemployment. What are the different types of unemployment? How are unemployment rates determined? What is full employment?

How Economic Security Changes during Retirement

WHY? Scholarships/Grants. Work Study. Federal Student Loans. Federal Parent Loans. Private Education Loans

Fall 2015 Staff Update

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

Q1 What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year?

LCAP / Supplemental and Concentration Regulations

Budget Development Update. January 8, 2019

Summary of Proposed Budget for FY June 11, 2013

COMMUNITY REPORT CARD Nine-County Region

a) The Future School Needs Committee Reviews and provides feedback on school enrollment projections.

Financial services associated with insurance and pension schemes (Insurance)

Initiative #93 Funding for Public Schools. Amendment? proposes amending the Colorado Constitution and Colorado statutes to:

GLOSSARY OF SCHOOL FINANCE TERMS

Proposed Fiscal Stress Monitoring System

Superintendent s Budget Recommendations & Contingent Budget Report. April 18, 2017

PT CPI Web 2.0 Instructions for a CI

Appropriate placement test scores. ENG 1010 or ENG score or prerequisite course

Proposed Budget. S u p e r i n t e n d e n t o f S c h o o l s F e b r u a r y 13, 2013

School Funding AN OVERVIEW OF HOW OHIO FUNDS ITS SCHOOLS. Legislative Service Commission March 2017

Pension Procedures. Setting up a Pension E/D on the employee

CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Prince Frederick, Maryland. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2013

Illinois LINKING STUDY

Unfulfilled Student Achievement Objectives

Tutorial Handout Statistics, CM-0128M Descriptive Statistics

20i School Supplies Oxford Central School

Introducing Edwin Analytics. Finance Reports

DIFFERENTIATED PERFORMANCE

A Study of the Alignment of the NWEA RIT Scale with the Maryland Assessment System. Deborah Adkins

STATE OF WORKING ARIZONA

West Virginia Parent Report for Lexile and Quantile Measures

Self Service Payments

FCMAT LCFF Calculator

FARMINGDALE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Chapter 3. Lecture 3 Sections

11/21/2014. Gainful Employment 2.0 More Questions Than Answers. More Questions Than Answers. More Questions Than Answers. December 2013 Draft GE 2.

The State of Michigan Talent

Maplewood Middle School Balanced Score Card for School Improvement Margaret Goode, Principal

COMMUNITY REPORT CARD Seneca County

New York State School Report Card.

Guidance and Instructions Handbook EXCESS COSTS CALCULATIONS INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (IDEA), PART B

Retirement Manager DISBURSEMENT ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATE EMPLOYEE GUIDE

UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 504 Oswego, Kansas

Modelling Collective Defined Contribution Schemes

COMMUNITY REPORT CARD Ontario County

Massachusetts Energy Efficiency Performance Incentive Mechanism. Jointly presented by PAs and Council Consultants August 17, 2016

Entering a Detailed Budget in Coeus Lite

C A F R OMPREHENSIVE NNUAL INANCIAL EPORT. A Component Unit of James City County, Virginia

Energy Efficiency Plans: Performance Incentive Mechanism Council Consultants

Budget Transfer Training: Salary

LAKE FOREST NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

BY: Teresa Hyden Diana Asseier Chief Business Official Chief Academic Officer (951) (951)

Using Display Options (Company Information) 2.11 Company Information

Proposed Budget

Everett. Change in 38,037 41,689 3,652

Legislative Briefings -- Fall 2013 Budget & Revenue Education, Financial Stability, Health

COMMUNITY REPORT CARD Wayne County

The social costs of dropouts in upper secondary education in Norway

Calculation Guide for the 2017 Financial Efficiency Star Rating

Transcription:

Example: Calculating the School Wide Composite Performance Index (CPI) Target for SY2012-13 Go to DESE website and locate your school s profile: http://profiles.doe.mass.edu Access the 2012 accountability report from the Accountability tab From the summary view of the report, click on View Detailed 2012 Data 1

Example: Calculating the School Wide CPI Target From the detailed report, identify the 6 Year Goal and the 2011 CPI (Baseline) for the subject area and student group of interest. In this example, we will calculate the ELA target for Low Income students 2

Example: Calculating the School Wide CPI Target For the Low Income students at this school, the 6-year CPI goal in ELA is 75.9 points, and the 2011 baseline was 51.7 points. Between 2011 and 2017, this group must increase its CPI by: 75.9-51.7 = 24.2 points Given the 6-year span between 2011 and 2017, the group must make gains of: 24.2 / 6 = 4 points each year Thus the target CPI for 2012 was: 51.7 + 4 = 55.7 (you can verify this by finding the number in the previous slide) The target for 2013 is therefore: 55.7 + 4 = 59.7 3

Thresholds for Progress and Performance Index The following slides provide the criteria used by DESE in allocating PPI points for each indicator. 4

PPI Thresholds for Achievement Indicators Achievement Indicator (ELA, Math, Science) Criteria Above Target (100 points) CPI >= 97.5, or Met CPI of 90 th percentile for all students in the grade span statewide, or Exceeded target by more than 1.25 CPI points On Target (75 points) Within +/ 1.25 points of CPI target, or Met CPI of 90 th percentile for the group in the grade span statewide, or Met CPI of 80 th percentile for all students in the grade span statewide Improved Below Target (50 points) Improved from prior year but below CPI target minus 1.25 points No Change (25 points) No change from prior year, or Up to 2.5 CPI point decline from prior year Declined (0 points) Decline of more than 2.5 CPI points from prior year

PPI Thresholds for Growth Indicators Growth ELA, Math Criteria Above Target (100 points) Median SGP of 60 points or higher, or Median SGP improvement of 15 or more points from prior year On Target (75 points) Median SGP between 51 59, or 10 14 median SGP point improvement, or Decreased non proficient percent by 10 percent or more from prior year Improved Below Target (50 points) Median SGP of 41 50, or 1 9 point median SGP improvement from prior year No Change (25 points) Median SGP of 31 40 Declined (0 points) Median SGP of 1 30

PPI Thresholds for Graduation Rates Annual Targets 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 4 Year Rate 75% 75% 80% 80% 85% 85% 90% 5 Year Rate 80% 80% 85% 85% 90% 90% 95% PPI Thresholds for Cohort Graduation Rate Indicator (High School only) (C) Cohort Graduation Rate Criteria Above Target (100 points) 4 or 5 year rate of 95 percent or higher On Target (75 points) Met 4 year rate target but was below 95 percent, or Met 5 year rate target but was below 95 percent Improved Below Target (50 points) Improvement in the 4 year rate of 2.5 percent or more from prior year, but below target No Change (25 points) Within +/ 2.5 percentage points of prior 4 year rate Declined (0 points) Decline of more than 2.5 percentage point from prior year

PPI Thresholds for Annual Dropout Rate Annual Dropout Rate Criteria (High School Only) Above Target (100 points) Dropout rate of 0 percent, or Met dropout rate of 90 th percentile for all students in the grade span statewide, or Exceeded annual gap having target by declining 3 or more percentage points from prior year On Target (75 points) Met annual gap halving target, or met dropout rate of 90 th percentile for the group in the grade span statewide, or Met dropout rate of 80 th percentile for all students in the grade span statewide Improved Below Target (50 points) Decrease of 0.5 percentage points or more from prior year, but below annual gap halving target No Change (25 points) Within +/ 0.5 percentage points of prior year rate Declined (0 points) Increase of greater than 0.5 percentage points