Settlements Report. September Construction Labor Research Council 1750 New York Avenue, NW Fourth Floor Washington, DC

Similar documents
Union Construction Labor Cost Trends and Outlook 2018

Comparative Revenues and Revenue Forecasts Prepared By: Bureau of Legislative Research Fiscal Services Division State of Arkansas

PRODUCER ANNUITY SUITABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS BY STATE As of September 11, 2017

Older consumers and student loan debt by state

Wage and Fringe Benefits Settlements Analysis

2016 Workers compensation premium index rates

TCJA and the States Responding to SALT Limits

Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State by State Analysis

The Acquisition of Regions Insurance Group. April 6, 2018

Property Tax Relief in New England

ehealth, Inc Fall Cost Report for Individual and Family Policyholders

Florida 1/1/2016 Workers Compensation Rate Filing

State Treatment of Social Security Treatment of Pension Income Other Income Tax Breaks Property Tax Breaks

Tax Breaks for Elderly Taxpayers in the States in 2016

< Executive Summary > Ready Mixed Concrete Industry Data Report Edition

SIGNIFICANT PROVISIONS OF STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE LAWS JANUARY 2008

Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center

PORTFOLIO REVENUE EXPENSES PERFORMANCE WATCHLIST

Eye on the South Carolina Housing Market presented at 2008 HBA of South Carolina State Convention August 1, 2008

The Voice For Union Construction and Maintenance

Who s Above the Social Security Payroll Tax Cap? BY NICOLE WOO, JANELLE JONES, AND JOHN SCHMITT*

Tax Freedom Day 2018 is April 19th

State Trust Fund Solvency

INTERIM SUMMARY REPORT ON RISK ADJUSTMENT FOR THE 2016 BENEFIT YEAR

The Entry, Performance, and Viability of De Novo Banks

The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company Term Portfolio

Local Anesthesia Administration by Dental Hygienists State Chart

Unemployment Insurance Benefit Adequacy: How many? How much? How Long?

Percent of Employees Waiving Coverage 27.0% 30.6% 29.1% 23.4% 24.9%

Medicare Alert: Temporary Member Access

Tax Freedom Day 2019 is April 16th

MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: Benchmarks for the Second Half of 2008 & 12 Months Ending 12/31/08

Age of Insured Discount

2018 National Electric Rate Study

Just The Facts: On The Ground SIF Utilization

Taxing Investment Income in the States New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute 2 nd Annual Budget and Policy Conference Concord, NH January 23, 2015

Uniform Consent to Service of Process

State of the Automotive Finance Market

Charles Gullickson (Penn Treaty/ANIC Task Force Chair), Richard Klipstein (NOLHGA)

50% are at or over 48, 50% are at or under 48 years of age (median) Cancer/Tumor registrars taking the survey ranged in age from 22 to 69

Oregon: Where Taxes Are Low, Fees Are High and Revenue Is Slightly Below Average

Medicaid in an Era of Change: Findings from the Annual Kaiser 50 State Medicaid Budget Survey

States and Medicaid Provider Taxes or Fees

Obamacare in Pictures. Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Texas Economic Outlook: Cruising in Third Gear

SCHIP: Let the Discussions Begin

Report to Congressional Defense Committees

Zions Bank Economic Overview

April Conducted by

2018 ADDENDUM INSTRUCTIONS

The Economics of Homelessness

Fannie Mae 2010 First Quarter Credit Supplement. May 10, 2010

2017 Supplemental Tax Information

PLEASE NOTE: Required American Equity specific Product Training must be completed PRIOR to soliciting an Application to A

Fiduciary Tax Returns

2016 GEHA. dental. FEDVIP Plans. let life happen. gehadental.com

NOTICE OF FEDERAL AND STATE TAX INFORMATION FOR PSA PLAN PAYMENTS YOUR ROLLOVER OPTIONS

COMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR REGISTRATION OF IN-HOUSE COUNSEL WITH STATE VERSIONS

Insured Deposit Program. Updated 03/31/2017

Fannie Mae 2009 First Quarter Credit Supplement. May 8, 2009

Alternative Paths to Medicaid Expansion

IMPROVING COLLEGE ACCESS

892 Coders Responded; 822 were full-time and 70 were part-time.

Experts Predict Sharp Decline in Competition across the ACA Exchanges

Insured Deposit Program Updated 10/17/2016

Fannie Mae 2008 Q3 10-Q Credit Supplement. November 10, 2008

Yolanda K. Kodrzycki New England Public Policy Center Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Strategic Partner(s) - Private Corporate Debt RFP #I Response to Inquiries

RLI TRANSPORTATION A Division of RLI Insurance Company 2970 Clairmont Road, Suite 1000 Atlanta, GA Phone: Fax:

Corporate Income Tax and Policy Considerations

Zions Bank Economic Overview

Application Trade Credit Insurance Multi Buyer

Please print using blue or black ink. Please keep a copy for your records and send completed form to the following address.

Obamacare in Pictures

36 Million Without Health Insurance in 2014; Decreases in Uninsurance Between 2013 and 2014 Varied by State

Aviva Announcing Changes to Products and Annuity Rates

Current Trends in the Medicaid RFP Procurement Landscape

2012 Catalyst Census Fortune 500

Fannie Mae 2009 Second Quarter Credit Supplement. August 6, 2009

Plunging Crude Prices: Impact on U.S. and State Economies

Fannie Mae 2012 Second-Quarter Credit Supplement. August 8, 2012

Indexed Universal Life Caps

Explaining the State Integrated Care and Financial Alignment Demonstrations for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries

How to Assist Beneficiaries Impacted by Aetna/Coventry 2015 Part D Plans

Executive Summary. Introduction

Benefits-At-A-Glance Plan Year

Charts with Analysis: Tax Tax Type: Sales and Use Tax Topic: Cash for Clunkers Payments

The State Tax Implications of Federal Tax Reform Legislation

Refinance Report August 2012

Real Gross Domestic Product

September Turning 65. Beyond a Rite of Passage. A nonprofit service and advocacy organization National Council on Aging

A Perspective from the Federal Reserve Institute of Internal Auditors San Antonio Chapter August 19, 2015 Blake Hastings Senior Vice President

CREDIT RISK BENCHMARKS

Food, Nutrition, Consumer Services

medicaid a n d t h e How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

CONSTRUCTION RISK MITIGATION THROUGH CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT

Long-Term Care Education Requirements Prior to Selling

Black Knight Mortgage Monitor

Utah Land Title Association Economic Overview February 1, 2016

Attention; Benefits/Human Resources office - Please send completed form to our address or fax number. Questions?

Transcription:

Settlements Report September 2012 Construction Labor Research Council 1750 New York Avenue, NW Fourth Floor Washington, DC 20006 202.347.8440

Dear Customer, In an effort to support you even better, we are pleased to introduce this upgraded Settlements Report. We trust that you will be pleased with the new content and format, which have changed significantly. Please take some extra time to familiarize yourself with the rich data included in this revised report. The changes include the following improvements: Greater use of graphics to more clearly illustrate the data Use of color to accentuate key points and add interest Descriptive headlines to guide the reader Addition of a 2-year comparison in the detailed distribution of settlements (Exhibits 4 & 5) Refinement of the increments in the detailed distribution of settlements to better represent the data (Exhibits 4 & 5) Addition of the median statistic, which better accounts for outliers, especially for pay related data (Exhibits 6, 7, 8 & 9) Increased data reporting for all crafts and geographic regions (there will be less missing data due to a change in the minimum data thresholds to align with industry standards) Expansion of the contract length analysis (Exhibit 10) Addition of a 5-year trend for years one, two and three of settlements (Exhibits 11 & 12) As the new Executive Director of the Construction Labor Research Council (CLRC), I look forward to a long and successful working relationship with you. The mission of CLRC is to provide accurate, objective and trusted research and consulting to the construction industry. I am energized to build upon CLRC s long and credible history to make it your top choice for support in your collective bargaining. CLRC is available to support you see p. 9 for a list of our services. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments at clpeters@clrcconsulting.org or 202.347.8440. We would be especially interested in any comments you have about this revised report. Best wishes, Carey L. Peters, Ph.D. Executive Director Construction Labor Research Council p.s., Due to customer requests, we have developed a new report, Wage and Fringe Benefits Settlements Detail, which shows specifically how 2011 and 2012 increases are being allocated among wages, health & welfare, pension, or other. The report is available for just $199. Contact us via e-mail or phone to order. Copyright 2012 Construction Labor Research Council 1

Settlements in the construction industry analyzed by the Construction Labor Research Council (CLRC) average the following: first year 2.2 percent ($1.01), second year 2.4 percent ($1.12), and third year 2.3 percent ($1.10). Statistics for 2012 in this report reflect wage and fringe benefits combined from January September 2012. Exhibits 1 and 2 show the 5-year trend. Exhibit 1 First year settlements, shown as percents 6% Exhibit 2 First year settlements, shown as dollars $2.50 5% 4.4% 4.6% $2.00 $1.75 $1.95 4% 3% 2% 2.8% 1.7% 1.7% 2.2% $1.50 $1.00 $1.23 $0.80 $0.73 $1.01 1% $0.50 0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sept 2012 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sept 2012 Increases from January September 2012, as percents, are higher than 2011 for contract years one and two and lower than 2011 for year three, as shown in Exhibit 3. The increases as dollar figures are higher so far in 2012 than in 2011 for year one and lower for years two and three. Exhibit 3 Settlements in 2011 compared to settlements from January September 2012 Contract 2011 September 2012 Year Percent Dollar Percent Dollar First 1.7% $0.73 2.2% $1.01 Second 2.3% $1.29 2.4% $1.12 Third 2.7% $1.54 2.3% $1.10 Beginning with this issue, each settlement is weighted equally. Previously, each settlement was weighted by the number of workers it covered. As a result, comparisons between this report and previous data should be made with caution. This adjustment in the statistical methodology is based on expert input from national associations in the construction industry. Copyright 2012 Construction Labor Research Council 2

Percent of Settlements Percent of Settlements The median increases so far in 2012 are similar to the averages outlined earlier, at 2.2 percent ($1.00) for the first year, 2.3 percent ($1.03) for the second year, and 2.4 percent ($1.00) for the third year. The median is the rate at which half of the agreements are higher and half are lower and is a common and useful statistic for evaluating pay data because it is less affected by outliers. Exhibits 4 and 5 show details about the first year of collectively bargained settlements. In Exhibit 4, the most noticeable feature is that so far this year 0.0 percent increases have been negotiated less often than last year. The most common settlement to date in 2012 is 2.1-2.5 percent. Exhibit 4 Details for first year settlements shown as percents: 2011 and January September 2012 25% 20% 2011 Peak Sept 2012 Peak 2011 Sept 2012 15% 10% 5% 0% 0% or less 0.1-0.5% 0.6-1.0% 1.1-1.5% 1.6-2.0% 2.1-2.5% 2.6-3.0% 3.1-3.5% 3.6-4.0% 4.1-4.5% 4.6-5.0% 5.1%+ Negotiated Settlements as a Percent Like Exhibit 4, Exhibit 5 shows that so far this year a $0.00 increase is being negotiated less often than last year. The most common agreement to date in 2012 has been for $1.01 - $1.20, whereas last year the most common increase (other than $0.00) was $0.81 - $1.00. Exhibit 5 Details for first year settlements shown as dollars: 2011 and January September 2012 25% 20% 2011 Peak Sept 2012 Peak 2011 Sept 2012 15% 10% 5% 0% $0.00 or less $0.01-0.20 $0.21-0.40 $0.41-0.60 $0.61-0.80 $0.81-1.00 $1.01-1.20 $1.21-1.40 $1.41-1.60 Negotiated Settlements as a Dollar Amount $1.61-1.80 $1.81 $2.01+ - 2.00 Copyright 2012 Construction Labor Research Council 3

Settlements by Region First year settlements from January September 2012 ranged from a low of 1.1 percent (median = 1.3 percent) in the South Central region to a high of 4.1 percent (5.0 percent) in the Southeast (all in Florida and Virginia), as shown in Exhibit 6. Exhibit 7 shows the same regions with the dollar amount of their agreements. The low was again the South Central region at $0.28 ($0.37) and the high was in New England at $1.70 ($2.21). Exhibit 6 Settlements by region shown as percents First Year Second Year Third Year Region Count Average Median Count Average Median Count Average Median New England 5 3.6% 4.5% < 3 - - < 3 - - Middle Atlantic 44 2.5% 2.5% 26 2.5% 2.4% 22 2.6% 2.7% Southeast 5 4.1% 5.0% < 3 - - < 3 - - East North Central 115 2.0% 2.0% 51 2.2% 2.3% 38 2.1% 2.2% West North Central 8 1.7% 1.6% 8 1.9% 1.9% 8 2.0% 1.9% South Central 5 1.1% 1.3% < 3 - - < 3 - - Mountain-Northern Plains 4 1.6% 1.7% 4 4.7% 4.7% 4 3.2% 3.5% Northwest 3 2.3% 2.4% < 3 - - < 3 - - Southwest Pacific 12 1.7% 1.8% 8 2.3% 2.3% 8 2.5% 2.6% United States 201 2.2% 2.2% 98 2.4% 2.3% 81 2.3% 2.4% Equal to or lower than United States results Higher than United States results Exhibit 7 Settlements by region shown as dollar amounts First Year Second Year Third Year Region Count Average Median Count Average Median Count Average Median New England 5 $1.70 $2.21 < 3 - - < 3 - - Middle Atlantic 44 $1.28 $1.25 26 $1.22 $1.35 22 $1.33 $1.35 Southeast 5 $1.52 $1.90 < 3 - - < 3 East North Central 115 $0.94 $0.92 51 $1.05 $0.90 38 $0.94 $0.90 West North Central 8 $0.62 $0.55 8 $0.73 $0.63 8 $0.77 $0.68 South Central 5 $0.28 $0.37 < 3 - - < 3 Mountain-Northern Plains 4 $0.71 $0.75 4 $2.10 $2.13 4 $1.51 $1.63 Northwest 3 $1.33 $0.75 < 3 - - < 3 Southwest Pacific 12 $0.81 $0.78 8 $1.12 $1.13 8 $1.28 $1.30 United States 201 $1.01 $1.00 98 $1.12 $1.03 81 $1.10 $1.00 Equal to or lower than United States results Higher than United States results Regions New England: CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT. Middle Atlantic: DC, DE, MD, NJ, NY, PA. Southeast: AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA. East North Central: IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI, WV. West North Central: IA, KS, MO, NE. South Central: AR, LA, NM, OK, TX. Mountain-Northern Plains: CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY. Northwest: AK, ID, OR, WA. Southwest Pacific: AZ, CA, HI, NV. Copyright 2012 Construction Labor Research Council 4

Settlements by Craft First year settlements from January September 2012 ranged from a low of 1.3 percent (median = 1.5 percent) for Teamsters to a high of 3.1 percent for Millwrights (2.4 percent) as shown in Exhibit 8. Exhibit 8 Settlements by craft shown as percents First Year Second Year Third Year Craft Count Average Median Count Average Median Count Average Median Boilermakers < 3 - - < 3 - - < 3 - - Bricklayers 18 1.7% 1.4% 5 2.4% 2.8% 5 2.3% 2.8% Carpenters 27 2.4% 2.4% 11 2.4% 2.3% 9 2.4% 2.5% Cement Masons 28 1.8% 1.9% 17 2.0% 1.9% 17 2.3% 2.4% Crane Operators 12 2.7% 2.7% 7 2.6% 2.4% 5 2.2% 2.2% Electricians 14 1.8% 1.7% 7 2.1% 1.9% 5 2.2% 1.6% Insulators 4 1.8% 1.6% < 3 - - < 3 - - Iron Workers 13 2.6% 2.5% 6 2.7% 2.7% 3 2.6% 2.4% Laborers 24 2.5% 2.1% 9 2.6% 2.3% 8 2.5% 2.4% Millwrights 12 3.1% 2.4% 3 2.4% 2.4% 3 2.8% 2.8% Painters 10 1.8% 2.6% 7 1.9% 2.0% 7 2.2% 2.3% Pipefitters/Plumbers 9 2.6% 2.3% 4 3.8% 3.0% < 3 - - Plumbers 5 2.2% 1.7% 3 3.6% 2.6% < 3 - - Plasterers 9 2.2% 2.3% 5 2.1% 2.1% 4 2.1% 2.1% Sheet Metal Workers 12 1.4% 1.4% 9 1.9% 2.0% 7 2.0% 1.7% Teamsters 3 1.3% 1.5% < 3 - - < 3 - - United States 201 2.2% 2.2% 98 2.4% 2.3% 81 2.3% 2.4% Equal to or lower than United States results Higher than United States results The following associations sponsor this report: Associated General Contractors of America (AGC) Finishing Contractors Association (FCA) International Council of Employers of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers (ICE) Mechanical Contractors Association of America (MCAA) National Association of Construction Boilermaker Employers (NACBE) National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) National Fire Sprinkler Association (NFSA) North American Contractors Association (NACA) Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association (SMACNA) The Association of Union Constructors (TAUC) Copyright 2012 Construction Labor Research Council 5

Settlements by Craft (continued) First year settlements from January September 2012 ranged from a low of $0.61 (median = $0.70) for Teamsters to a high of $1.51 ($1.32) for Millwrights as shown in Exhibit 9. Exhibit 9 Settlements by craft shown as dollar amounts First Year Second Year Third Year Craft Count Average Median Count Average Median Count Average Median Boilermakers < 3 - - < 3 - - < 3 - - Bricklayers 18 $0.77 $0.68 5 $1.06 $1.26 5 $1.06 $1.26 Carpenters 27 $1.09 $1.10 11 $1.17 $0.90 9 $1.10 $0.90 Cement Masons 28 $0.75 $0.71 17 $0.82 $0.70 17 $0.97 $0.95 Crane Operators 12 $1.30 $1.40 7 $1.32 $1.15 5 $1.15 $1.10 Electricians 14 $0.87 $0.79 7 $1.11 $0.81 5 $1.15 $0.80 Insulators 4 $1.06 $0.88 < 3 - - < 3 - - Iron Workers 13 $1.27 $1.28 6 $1.39 $1.50 3 $1.31 $1.20 Laborers 24 $1.06 $0.75 9 $1.05 $0.88 8 $1.04 $0.99 Millwrights 12 $1.51 $1.32 3 $1.34 $1.34 3 $1.58 $1.51 Painters 10 $0.71 $0.97 7 $0.80 $0.74 7 $0.93 $0.90 Pipefitters/Plumbers 9 $1.48 $1.10 4 $2.00 $1.88 < 3 - - Plumbers 5 $1.25 $0.85 3 $1.72 $1.40 < 3 - - Plasterers 9 $1.00 $1.10 5 $0.89 $1.00 4 $0.88 $0.85 Sheet Metal Workers 12 $0.66 $0.73 9 $0.95 $0.90 7 $1.01 $1.00 Teamsters 3 $0.61 $0.70 < 3 - - < 3 - - United States 201 $1.01 $1.00 98 $1.12 $1.03 81 $1.10 $1.00 Equal to or lower than United States results Higher than United States results The August 2012 unemployment rate in the construction industry was 11.3 percent. The unemployment rate for the United States was 8.1 percent.* *Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Copyright 2012 Construction Labor Research Council 6

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sept 2012 2007 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Percent of Contracts 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sept 2012 Sept 2012 Contract Length From 2008 to 2011 there was a definite trend toward shortening the number of years in contract settlements. To illustrate, in 2008, 39 percent of the contracts were for one year and by 2011, 68 percent were for one year, nearly a 30 percent increase in just three years. Conversely, the percent of three year or longer terms went from 52 percent to 23 percent during this same time. However, so far in 2012, this trend has not continued with just 51 percent of the agreements for one year and 40 percent for three years or more, as shown in Exhibit 10. Exhibit 10 Contract length trend 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% One Year Two Years Three or More Years Duration of Contract The Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose by 1.4 percent for the 12 months ending July 2012* *Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Copyright 2012 Construction Labor Research Council 7

Dollar Amount Increase Percent Increase Multiyear Settlements Trend As illustrated by Exhibits 11 and 12, beginning in 2009, the trend was for smaller increases, but with each successive contract year containing a larger increase than the previous year, on average. In other words, year two had a larger increase than year one and year three had a larger increase than year two. However, it appears that the trend may end; to date in 2012, years one, two and three are all within 0.2 percent and $0.11 of each other. Exhibit 11 Multiyear settlements trend shown as percents for years one, two, and three 6% 5% 4% Year One Year Two Year Three 3% 2% 1% 0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sept 2012 Year Negotiated Exhibit 12 Multiyear settlements trend shown as dollars for years one, two, and three $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 Year One Year Two Year Three $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sept 2012 Year Negotiated Copyright 2012 Construction Labor Research Council 8

Additional wage and fringe benefits related reports are available for purchase upon request. Companies/contractors, chapters, and local affiliates who are members of CLRC s sponsor associations (see p. 5) receive discounted rates. Report Description Benefit Wage and Fringe Benefits Settlements Detail Shows specifically where fringe benefits increases are going in 2011 and 2012 wages, health and Provides critical benchmark information about how each craft is distributing its increases. Craft by Region/City Benchmark Comparison Historical Trend Settlement Detail Custom welfare, pension, or other. Drills down to evaluate wage and fringe benefits data for a specific craft in a specific region or city. Compares wage and fringe benefits for one or more craft(s) and/or region(s) to benchmark data such as the CPI, ECI, or all craft average. Graphs wage and fringe benefits rates and/or increases over time for one or more craft(s) or region(s). Shows the details for a specific craft or region regarding increases as percents and dollars (like Exhibits 4 & 5 in this report). Tell us what you are looking for, we can probably help you. Additional Products and Services Allows you to look at the specific craft(s) in which you are interested, in the exact location you want. Helps you evaluate union pay increases compared to market indicators. Illustrates increases through the years, reflecting the cumulative monetary value paid by employers. Provides you with more detail to better understand what the percent and dollar increases are for a given craft or region. Offers you greater understanding and useful data to use during collective bargaining. In addition to wage and fringe benefits data, CLRC offers a number of other consulting services and products: Market Share Studies Labor Contract Cost Analysis Workforce Planning Projections Collective Bargaining Support Custom Research Union and Nonunion Wage and Fringe Benefits Comparison Safety Surveys Global EPC Costs Survey Development and Administration Construction Labor Research Council 1750 New York Avenue, NW Fourth Floor Washington, DC 20006 202.347.8440 clrcconsulting.org (coming soon) This report has been prepared from information collected and maintained by CLRC. Reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the data, summaries and analyses. However, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. CLRC disclaims any liability from damages of any kind which may result from the use of this report. Copyright 2012 Construction Labor Research Council 9