The First Case of FTA Compensation for Income Loss on Food Crops in Korea

Similar documents
Statistical Factsheet. France CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

Statistical Factsheet. Belgium CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

Statistical Factsheet. Italy CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

Statistical Factsheet. Lithuania CONTENTS. Main figures - Year 2016

Factsheet: Trade in Goods

Netherlands. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Italy. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Austria. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Estonia. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Farm Vendor Application

France. May 2018 Statistical Factsheet

Detailed Guidelines for Agro-Fisheries Product Tariff Rate Quota. Recommendation and Import Management. Pursuant to the Free Trade Agreement Between

Greece. Sources: European Commission, Eurostat, and Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Updated: M ay 2018

Denmark. Sources: European Commission, Eurostat, and Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Updated: M ay 2018

Domestic Support of Agriculture in Brazil

Chapter 1. General Provisions

ANNEX 3. Year Trigger Level 9,900 9,900 10,098 10,299 10,505 10,716

FTA UTILIZATION POLICY OF SOUTH KOREA

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 18: ANALYSIS OF PAST FARM BILL PROGRAMS III

United States South Korea. Free Trade Agreement. What it would mean for California Agriculture. California Farm Bureau Federation

Prepare, print, and e-file your federal tax return for free!

Costs regarded as developmental expenditures

USDA Risk Management

Click to edit Master title style. Credit Analysis. Assessing the Risk Profile of a. Pork Production Company

Certified Public Accountants

Organic Crop Improvement Association International, Inc. Master Fee Schedule

Managing Revenue Risk: How to Determine if NAP or Other Revenue Insurance Products Are a Fit for Your Business

Risk Management: An Introduction to Crop Insurance

T R A N S L A T I O N

Benefits to U.S. Agriculture

Paper presented at Domestic and Trade Impacts of U.S. Farm Policy: Future Directions and Challenges, November 15-16, 2007, Washington DC.

CN Tower 301 Front St W. Toronto, ON Environics Analytics FoodSpend. Page 1

Trade Report- Q Trade Report Q4 2017

2019 The City of Seven Hills Farmers Market Vendor Application Application Fee $20.00

Crop Insurance for Tree Fruit Producers. 1 Dyson Cornell SC Johnson College of Business

L 346/12 Official Journal of the European Union

3. In certain circumstances, intervention purchases or private storage aid may operate to remove surplus production from the market.

<Korea Feed Association (KFA)-Public Announcement>

2018 The City of Seven Hills Farmers' Market Vendor Application

The Azerbaijani economy in the first nine of 2018: Brief Overview

Workshop on Agriculture Notifications Geneva, September 2009 Domestic support

WTO Commitments and Support to Agriculture: Experience from Canada

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

National Crop Insurance Services

Federal Crop Insurance: Specialty Crops

4Q 2017 Earnings Call. 22 November 2017

Buying Hedge with Futures

CHAPTER 8. AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE WAY TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

Russian experience in crop insurance and satellite monitoring of crops

2Q 2018 Earnings Call. 18 May 2018

ACCESSION OF BULGARIA. Communication from Bulgaria

Impact of Subsidy and Income Limits on Farm Size Measured at the State, County, and Farm Level

7 CFR Parts 900, 1150, 1160, 1205, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1209, 1210, 1212, 1214, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1219, 1220, 1221, 1222,

<Korea Feed Ingredients Association-Public Announcement >

Mozambique: Business Climate & Investment Opportunities for Special Economic Zones

16.E.2 Domestic Support in OECD Countries

The Crop Insurance Regulations

APPENDIX 2-A-1 KOREA

Agricultural Producers Support Act

What types of insurance should I consider for my farm?

3Q 2018 Earnings Call. 17 August 2018

Sri Lanka Accounting Standard LKAS 41. Agriculture

12/14/2009. Goals Today. Introduction. Crop Insurance, the SURE Disaster Assistance Program, and Farm Risk Management

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

Kentucky Farmers Market Price Report 5/30 6/05/2016

d) T F GRP is the most popular crop insurance policy in Wisconsin for corn and soybeans, especially for small farms.

Risk Management Agency Dave Schumann

ANNEX CAP evolution and introduction of direct payments

Screening Exercise Serbia

2010 No. 167 AGRICULTURE, ENGLAND. The Hill Farm Allowance Regulations 2010

AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 19: ANALYSIS OF THE 2014 FARM BILL I

AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY SECTOR

TRADE POLICIES BY SECTOR (1) AGRICULTURE

Statement of Farming Activities

Economic Impact of Canada s Potential Participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

May Marketing Generalities. U-pick (n=13) Range (price per pound) Average (price per pound) Average. Range (price per pound)

AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

Sri Lanka Accounting Standard-LKAS 41. Agriculture

REPORTING PERIOD: Marketing Year Current Total Aggregate Measurement of Support

STATISTICS CANADA RELEASES 2015 NET FARM INCOME AND FARM CASH RECEIPTS DATA

The spectrum of farming proper is wide. Financial aid is granted to the following lines of production:

Testimony. of Linda Dempsey Vice President, International Economic Affairs National Association of Manufacturers

Kentucky Farmers Market Price Report 7/4 7/10/2016

National Bureau of Statistics. Poverty measurement note

Case Study #1: Mixed Farm Operation - The Kattel Farm

Crop Insurance Options for Organic Producers

ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF THE ACTIVITY OF THE SC TREPMAR LLC, ŞOPÂRLIȚA, OLT COUNTY ( )

2016 Crop Insurance Update

International Monetary Fund Washington, D.C.

RISK MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR SPECIALTY CROP PRODUCERS IN FLORIDA

Statement of Farming Activities

2006 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2007

Cultivate risk reduction

Document prepared by the Chilean Embassy in South Korea Fourth Anniversary of the Korea-Chile FTA: An Assessment of the results

Overview of Presentation

Enterprise Budgets. How is it constructed?

LKAS 41 Sri Lanka Accounting Standard LKAS 41

CHAPTER 3 FARM INCOME

Transcription:

The First Case of FTA Compensation for Income Loss on Food Crops in Korea Sung-Jae Chun Public-Service Advocate of Korea FTA compensation for income loss will be given to sorghum, potato, sweet potato, Korean native calf and compensation for closure will be given to Korean native calf. This is the first case of compensation for food crops since the implementation of the FTA compensation policy in 2004. The compensation will be allocated until the end of the year following the applications from the farm. The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (Minister LEE Dong-Phil, hereinafter MAFRA ) has announced on May 29 th, 2014 that it has planned for the FTA Compensation for Income Loss on sorghum, potato, sweet potato, Korean native calf and compensation for closure on Korean native calf. The Compensation for Income Loss is paid with being based on the Special Act On Assistance To Farmers, Fishermen, etc. Following the Conclusion of Free Trade Agreements. The certain amount (90%) of the declined price is being preserved by the government when the price of domestic agricultural products declines (90%) due to the increase of imports by the implementation of the FTA. Meanwhile, the Compensation for Closure is paid with being based on Special Act On Assistance To Farmers, Fishermen, etc. Following the Conclusion of Free Trade Agreements. Three years of net gain is being preserved by the government when the farmer closes down due to the rapid increase of imports by the implementation of the FTA. According to MAFRA, Support Committee for Farmers Upon the Implementation of the FTA (hereinafter Support Committee ) have opened the 1 st Meeting in 2014 on May 29 th and decided on the items for Compensation for Income Loss and for Closure upon the implementation of the FTA last year. Additionally, the items for FTA compensation are reviewed by the Support Committee based on the analysis by Support Center for Farmers Upon the Implementation of the FTA (hereinafter Support Center ). In case of Compensation for Income Loss, based on the analysis by Support Center on import quantity in 2013 and domestic price, millet, sorghum, potato, sweet potato and Korean native cow have all fulfilled the requirements of Table 2 like following table 1. 1

Table 1. Analysis Result of the Requirement for Compensation for Income Loss in 2014 Items Total Import Quantity (in tons) Import Quantity of the FTA Member State (in tons) Domestic Price (won/kg, 1,000won per unit) Criteria In 2013 Member Criteria In 2013 Criteria In 2013 State Millet 15,339 15,603 EU 10 21 4,251 4,113 ASEAN 0.000 0.001 Sorghum 4,362 5,853 USA 329 618 5,246 4,546 Potato 92,644 151,634 USA 80,859 130,684 EU 2,907 6,278 ASEAN 12 15 EFTA 1.574 3.093 India 32 85 935 782 Sweet potato 899 1,253 ASEAN 4 299 1,574 1,465 Korean native calf 278,276 300,491 USA 95,321 100,414 1,804 1,636 Chile 0 427 Table 2. Requirements for Compensation for Income Loss (All three requirements must be met) i) Total import quantity exceeds the criteria (average import quantity for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount in the last 5 years (2008~2012)) ii) Import quantity of the FTA Member State exceeds the criteria (average import quantity for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount in the last 5 years (2008~2012) x coefficient for import damage) iii) Average price drops below the criteria (average price for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount over the last 5 years (2008~2012) x 0.9) Since the implementation of the Compensation for Income Loss upon Korea-Chile FTA in 2004, the policy was first put into effect last year on Korean native cows and calves. It was the first time that the policy is applied upon food crops like millet, sorghum, potato and sweet potato. Moreover, Support Committee has confirmed the Contribution Ratio of Import (CRI) in order to only reflect the effect of increase in import on the decrease in price according to the purpose of the law upon calculating the amount of direct payment. The CRI means the contribution ration of increase in import on the decrease in price. In January 2013, when the Support Committee calculated the amount of direct payment, it has decided to apply the CRI excluding the decrease in price caused by the increase in domestic supply and to only apply the decrease in price by FTA importation. Accordingly, the 1 st Support Committee has reviewed and decided the level of contribution to be the following: 2

millet 0.0%; sorghum 13.4%; potato 36.0%; sweet potato 0.55%; Korean native cows 31.0%. This will be applied when deciding the amount of direct payment. The related formula is as follows. *Direct payment for income loss = (production area x national average production per area unit) x [(base price average price in 2013) x 0.9] x coordination factor ** Coordination factor = (available amount of subsidy / requested amount of compensation) x Contribution Ratio of Import (CRI) Furthermore, Support Committee has reviewed and decided to include Korean native cows on compensation for closure. Such measure is based on the law that items for compensation for closure should be chosen among the items for compensation for income loss. Among the items for compensation for income loss, food crops such as millet, sorghum, potato and sweet potato do not need large investment costs such as cost of equipment and since they are perennial crops, they are not eligible for compensation for closure. Compensation for Closure is targeted for farms with breeding cows and is limited to farms in which cows for breeding are closed for business. However, the size of the compensation for closure will consider factors such as the appropriate number of Korean native cows, budget size and priorities for support and apply them upon yearly support plans. Table 3 shows Requirements for Selecting Items for Compensation for Closure. Table 3. Requirements for Selecting Items for Compensation for Closure An item will be selected for compensation for closure if it fulfills all of the following requirements: 1. The item should be selected for the compensation for income loss 2. The item should fulfill one of the following: A. High investment cost for cultivation or breeding and difficult to collect the investment upon closure; B. Difficult to gain short-term profit because it take 2 years or longer to cultivate or breed; and C. Other needs to provide the compensation for closure MAFRA will announce the selected items by the middle of June and upon the application of farms, analysis and review by the local government, the compensation for income loss and closure will be allocated by December. However, since the compensation for income loss cannot go over the subsidy limit by WTO Agreements on Agriculture, the unit cost of payment and budget required cost will be finalized on December by the review of the Support Committee figuring out the total amount of the payment after receiving the farmer s applications. According to the officials from MAFRA, since compensation for income loss was first allocated last year, the ministry will distribute compensation for income loss on food crops such as sorghum, potato 3

and sweet potato without delay. Furthermore, the ministry will proceed with the backup measures on the FTA to minimize the damage on agricultural and fishery products as the FTA expands. References Reference Materials for FTA Compensation for Income Loss and Closure Reference 1 The Result of the Selection of Items for FTA Compensation for Income Loss (Investigation and Analyzing Agency) Korea Rural Economic Institute* (Center for FTA Farmer s Support) * Reviewed and decided by Supporting Committee for FTA Farmers and designated by the Minister (March 8, 2012) (Items for Investigation) 42 items subjected to monitoring * Items for monitoring: The items designated by the Minister because of a considerable impact on domestic market upon FTA implementation (9 animal products, 17 horticultural and herbal products, 16 cereals, etc.). Items for investigation and analysis by Center for FTA Farmer s Support Section Common area (16 items) Animal area (9 items) Horticulture area (17 items) Items for Monitoring (42 items) Sorts of barley (barley, wheat), grain (corn, millet, sorghum, adlay), Sorts of beans (soybean, mung bean, red bean), root and tuber crops (potato, sweet potato), forest (walnut, chestnut, pine nut, ginkgo nut, jujube) Beef (Korean native cow, beet cattle, calf), pork meat, chicken meat, duck meat, milk, egg, honey Vegetable (lettuce, cucumber, strawberry, melon, carrot, onion), fruit (tangerine (outdoors, facilities), grape (outdoors, facilities), cherry, kiwi), special usage (sesame), medical usage (fresh ginseng), flower (carnation, cactus) (The Result of the Analysis) 5 items have fulfilled the requirements for FTA Compensation for Income Loss (millet, sorghum, potato, sweet potato, Korean native cow). 4

The Result of the 2014 Analysis on the Requirements for FTA Compensation for Income Loss Items Total import(tons) Import(tons) Price( Korean WON/kg, 1000 Korean WON/item) Criteria 2013 Member Criteria 2013 Criteria 2013 States Millet 15,339 15,603 EU 10 21 4,251 4,113 ASEAN 0.000 0.001 Sorghum 4,362 5,853 USA 329 618 5,246 4,546 Potato 92,644 151,634 Sweet potato Korean native cow USA 80,859 130,684 EU 2,907 6,278 ASEAN 12 15 EFTA 1.574 3.093 India 32 85 935 782 899 1,253 ASEAN 4 299 1,574 1,465 278,276 300,491 USA 95,321 101,414 1,804 1,636 Chile 0 427 [Annex 1] Summary of the Compensation for Income Loss (Purpose) The purpose of the Compensation for Income Loss is to preserve certain amount of the price decline of items that suffered decline in price due to rapid increase of import quantities upon FTA implementation. (Subjected items) Agricultural and fishery products in which tariff is being reduced or abolished or those products subjected to the increase in tariff rate quota (Criteria of provision) All of the following three requirements should be fulfilled to receive compensation 1 (Price Requirement) The subject s average price of the year drops lower than 90% of the average price for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount over the last 5 years 2 (Total import quantity requirement) Total import quantity of the year exceeds the average import quantity for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount over the last 5 years 5

3 (Import quantity requirement) Import quantity from the Member State exceeds the average import quantity for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount over the last 5 years * {average import quantity for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount over the last 5 years(2008~2012)} x (coefficient for import damage) (Calculation Method) production area x national average production per area unit x unit cost of payment x coordination factor (livestock industry) number of shipment ( 出荷 ) x unit cost of payment x coordination factor (unit cost of payment*) 90% of the difference between the standard price and average price of the year * {(average price for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount in the last 5 years) x 0.9} average price of the year} x 0.9 (coordination factor) = (available amount of subsidy / requested amount of compensation) x Contribution Ratio of Import(CRI) * * The amount of influence the increase of import quantity on the decline of price of the item [Annex 2] Details of the Requirement of the Compensation for Income Loss (1 st Requirement) Tariff should be reduced or abolished according to the agreement or tariff rate quota should be increased (Sub-paragraph 1, paragraph 2, article 4, Enforcement Decree of the Special Act on Assistance following the FTA) (2 nd Requirement) The total amount of import on the year should be larger than the standard amount of import upon the implementation of the agreement (Sub-paragraph 2, paragraph 1, article 7, the Special Act on Assistance following the FTA) 1 Total amount of import: the amount of import worldwide 2 The standard amount of import: average import quantity for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount over the last 5 years (3 rd Requirement) The total amount of import from the Member State of the agreement of the year 6

should be larger than the standard amount of import upon the implementation of the agreement (Subparagraph 2, paragraph 1, article 7, the Special Act on Assistance following the FTA) 1 The standard amount of import: (average import quantity for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount in the last 5 years} x (Coefficient of importation ( 收入發動係數 )) 2 Coefficient of importation: Considering the special emergency tariff standard coefficient for agricultural and livestock products in the Enforcement Decree of the Customs Act (Orders from the Minister, August 24, 2011), the Coefficient of importation is decided according to the market share. Classification Coefficient under SSG Coefficient of importation Lower than 10% 1.25 1.15 Market share 10%~30% 1.10 Higher than 30% 1.05 (4 th Requirement) The average price of the item of the year falls lower than the standard price upon the implementation of the agreement (Sub-paragraph 1, paragraph 1, article 7, the Special Act on Assistance following the FTA) 1 Standard price: average price for 3 years excluding the highest and the lowest amount in the last 5 years x 90% [Annex 3] Summary of the Support for Closure (Purpose) Compensation for Closure is allocated to items in which it is difficult to cultivate and raise due to the implementation of FTA Criteria for selection, criteria for allocation, calculation method, allocation procedure and implementation period will be stipulated in the enforcement decree. (Criteria for selection) The item should be among the items for compensation for income loss and should be regarded as appropriate for compensation for closure* *1 It takes large amount of investment cost and is difficult to collect the cost upon closure, 2 it takes 2 years to cultivate, raise and feed therefore is difficult to earn profit over a short period of time, 3 other needs for support 7

(Criteria for allocation) in case which the farmers or fishermen demolish or discard the place of business, land, trees or fishing boats, fishing gears and other facilities that have been in use before the implementation. However, if it falls under each sub-paragraph of paragraph 1, article 7 in the enforcement decree,* the compensation is not given. *1 the item is not produced for longer than a year prior to the notification of the items 2the items are demolished or discarded due to reasons other than agricultural or fishery work such as construction of buildings or roads, 3 cases in which the Minister has recognized such as compensation is given by another Act The details of the requirement is decided by the Minister after the Supporting Committee s review. (Calculation Method) area of demolition or discard x yearly net gain per unit square meter x 3 years livestock = unit shipment of livestock x yearly net gain per each unit x 3 years (Implementation period) 5 years since the implementation of Korea-EU FTA (July 1, 2011~2016). This is the news release of Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs of Korea. Date submitted: July 16, 2014 Reviewed, edited and uploaded: July 18, 2014 8