The election of Donald Trump and his focus on a more protectionist agenda has put China and Asia back in the global spotlight Only a year ago China was centre stage with concern over capital flight, over -leverage and fears of a hard landing, with global and systemic impact. But the latter concerns proved unfounded, with the fiscal stimulus imparted in mid-2015 and the lower/longer Fed policy stance breathing some more life into the China story. Perhaps also Brexit and the US elections took China risk off the newspaper front pages, preventing a vicious cycle from developing. Trump s election brings a new risk to the fore, namely a US-China trade war that proves the straw that breaks the camel s back and exposes the same internal fragilities again. The impact would be felt across Asia, focusing attention on the region s structural challenges such as ageing populations and high levels of private sector indebtedness. That said recent higher frequency indicators, including PMIs, are showing something of an upturn. Note the strong trade prints out of China and neighbouring manufacturing hubs for January and February, consistent with new-cycle highs for regional and global growth. Market Insight Graham Stock Tim Ash Senior EM Sovereign Strategists Published Page 1 of 5
US$/40ft box %oya Fig. 1: China GDP (nominal value-add) 25.0 20.0 15.0 Services Industry & construction Total GDP 10.0 5.0 0.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: China National Bureau of Statistics, BlueBay as at December 2016 We see mixed messages in the data, however. New export orders and business confidence readings in the PMIs have lost momentum, and yet buoyant imports of capital goods and raw materials suggest manufacturing sectors that are planning to boost output. It is therefore hard to say with confidence whether China and the broader region will be facing up to any trade conflicts from a position of strength or as export performance is already slowing. China is already in unprecedented territory Logic and history suggest that there is very likely to be a major systemic crisis in China, likely focused on the debt overhang, but we no longer think that it will be this year. No developing economy, whether that is the UK during the industrial revolution, the NICs in the 1990s, Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union in the 1990s, or Turkey in the 2000s has managed transition from one fundamental model of development to another without market dislocations and crises. It is traumatic but essential, in particular, to recognise the inefficiencies in the old financing model as a new one is put in place. And having already moved a long way from central planning to a market-driven economy, China is now undergoing a second seismic shift from exports and investment to consumption-driven growth. It would therefore be a miracle if China did not also at some stage encounter major market dislocation, the only questions being timing, scale and global impact. Fig. 2: Freight rates to/from China 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 Shanghai to Rotterdam Shanghai to LA Rotterdam to Shanghai LA to Shanghai 0 Mar 13 Sep 13 Mar 14 Sep 14 Feb 15 Aug 15 Feb 16 Aug 16 Jan 17 Source: World Container Index, Drewry, as reported by Bloomberg, as of 9 Page 2 of 5
It seemed from campaign and post-election rhetoric that the trigger for disruption could be Trump s protectionist agenda with China in the (metaphorical) firing line. It now appears that a more traditional Republican pro-business agenda is smoothing the edges of the White House stance, and a presidential summit could further that process in the coming months, if the two leaders can establish some personal chemistry. A confrontational US stance is the last thing China wants this year. Ahead of the critical 19th Party Congress in October, the Chinese authorities are keen not to rock the boat or take undue risks. This was the clear message from the Work Report published at the start of the ongoing National People s Congress. The headline GDP growth target of 6.5% or slightly higher if possible marks a moderate downgrade from 2016 s 6.5-7.0% target. More importantly, the leadership warned that 6.5% GDP growth is unattainable in the absence of reforms, and has signalled a retreat from the extraordinary stimulus of 2015-16. This is consistent with the continued tightening of monetary conditions, and indications that Guo Shuqing at the bank regulator has a mandate to rein in wealth management products and other aspects of shadow banking. We think the broader market has been slow to appreciate China s commitment to stabilising the renminbi against a trade-weighted basket, which in turn leaves the bilateral USD/CNY exchange rate dependent on the dollar s moves aga inst the other components. Tighter domestic monetary conditions and more rigid controls on capital outflows will nevertheless reduce the cost in reserve losses of achieving that stabilisation against the basket. Trump and the art of the China deal Some elements in the Trump administration appear serious about rebalancing the trading relationship with China. They have some common ground with foreign policy hawks that are looking to counter China's military/geopolitical threat. Trump himself started off on the front foot, questioning the One China policy and threatening to block Chinese expansion in the South China Sea. As with other aspects of the nascent policy stance, the past few weeks have suggested moderation, with Trump accepting the One China policy in the call with Xi. It remains to be seen whether this was a policy fumble or a tactical opening gambit in the art of the deal. Trump likely wants to a cut deal on trade - securing better US trade access to China, in exchange for continued Chinese trade access to the US, but overall aimed at cutting China's still large trade surplus with the US. We have to assume the aim is a win-win outcome, but angled to slightly more Tweet-worthy wins for the USA. The tactics to get there will be fleshed out over the coming months. The timing should favour Trump. As noted above, Xi is vulnerable this year ahead of the Party Congress. He will not want to risk a full -blown trade war with the USA which could spark a larger crisis. He will likely be willing to deal, but there are clearly red lines dictated by nationalist sentiment in China. Xi will not be able to back down on areas such as the One China policy and the South China Sea. Trade is a more promising area for compromise. In 2016, China exported US$463bn of goods to the USA, and imported US$116bn. The contours of a deal will necessarily be complex, like all trade negotiations. China will be making common cause with domestic US lobbies from sectors such as food/agriculture, aerospace and energy to counter threats of disruption to their order books. Page 3 of 5
Fig. 3: China trade 15 10 Exports, %oya 3mma Imports, %oya 3mma 5 0-5 -10-15 -20-25 Mar 14 Aug 14 Jan 15 Jun 15 Nov 15 Apr 16 Sep 16 Feb 1 Source: China General Administration of Customs, BlueBay, as of February 2017 The carrot will perhaps be better access for US companies in key sectors such as services, banking and even IT, although a big-bang liberalisation can be ruled out given ongoing Chinese fears of social upheaval. We may even see some pre-emptive efforts by China to reach out to warm the relationship, for example by announcing some high profile investment into the US manufacturing sector or support for infrastructure development. The threat of a Chinese sell -down of their US Treasury holdings will remain a last resort. While we assume a positive outcome in China-US relations ultimately, as both have too much to lose, the challenge from a market perspective is getting the dynamics of that right. It seems likely that Trump will still try to heighten tensions in the run up to any deal. His fling with the Taiwanese president, and against the One China policy, is unlikely to be enough. We should expect some further near-term strains. A version of this piece was published in the Beyond Brics section of the Financial Times on Monday 13. Page 4 of 5
This document is issued in the United Kingdom (UK) by BlueBay Asset Management LLP (BlueBay), which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). BlueBay is also registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA) as authorised by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This document may also be issued in the United States by BlueBay Asset Management USA LLC which is registered with the SEC and the NFA. In Japan, by BlueBay Asset Management International Limited which is registered with the Kanto Local Finance Bureau of Ministry of Finance, Japan. In Switzerland, by BlueBay Asset Management AG where the Representative and Paying Agent is BNP Paribas Securities Services, Paris, succursale de Zurich, Selnaustrasse 16, 8002 Zurich, Switzerland. The place of performance is at the registered office of the Representative. The courts of the registered office of the Swiss representative shall have jurisdiction pertaining to claims in connection with the distribution of the Shares in Switzerland. In Germany, BlueBay is operating under a branch passport pursuant to the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (Directive 2011/61/EU). In Australia, BlueBay is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence under the Corporations Act in respect of financial services as it is regulated by the FCA under the laws of the UK which differ from Australian laws. In Canada, BlueBay is not registered under securities laws and is relying on the international dealer exemption under applicable provincial securities legislation, which permit BlueBay to carry out certain specified dealer activities for those Canadian residents that qualify as "a Canadian permitted client, as such term is defined under applicable securities legislation. The registrations and memberships noted should not be interpreted as an endorsement or approval of any of the BlueBay entities identified by the respective licensing or registering authorities. Unless otherwise stated, all data has been sourced by BlueBay. To the best of BlueBay s knowledge and belief this document is true and accurate at the date hereof. BlueBay makes no express or implied warranties or representations with respect to the information contained in this document and hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of accuracy, completeness or fitness for a particular purpose. The document is intended only for professional clients and eligible counterparties (as defined by the FCA) or in the US by accredited investors (as defined in the Securities Act of 1933) or qualified purchasers (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940) as applicable and should not be relied upon by any other category of customer. In Hong Kong, the Fund is not authorised by the Securities and Futures Commission for sale to the retail public and this document is only available for professional investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordina nce (Cap 571)) only. This document does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase any security or investment product in any jurisdiction and is for information purposes only. This document is not available for distribution in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be prohibited and is not aimed at such persons in those jurisdictions. Except where agreed explicitly in writing, BlueBay does not provide investment or other advice and nothing in this document constitutes any advice, nor should be interpreted as such. No BlueBay Fund will be offered, except pursuant and subject to the offering memorandum and subscription materials. This document is for general information only and is not a complete description of an investment in any BlueBay Fund. If there is an inconsistency between this document and the offering materials for the BlueBay Fund, the provisions in the Offering Materials shall prevail. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The investments discussed may fluctuate in value and investors may not get back the amount invested. You should read the offering materials carefully before investing in any BlueBay fund. No part of this document may be reproduced in any manner without the prior written permission of BlueBay. Copyright 2017 BlueBay, is a whollyowned subsidiary of RBC and BlueBay may be considered to be related and/or connected to Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) and its other affiliates. Registered trademark of RBC. RBC Global Asset Management is a trademark of RBC. BlueBay Asset Management LLP, registered office 77 Grosvenor Street, London W1K 3JR, partnership registered in England and Wales number OC370085. All rights reserved. Published Page 5 of 5