P ARISH OF EAST B ATON ROUGE, L OUISIANA BREC S TRATEGIC P LAN

Similar documents
2018 APPROVED ANNUAL BUDGET

PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT

Develop and implement the City s capital construction programs for parks, trails and other associated infrastructure

City of Penticton: Financial Plan Reporting Structure

2019 ANNUAL BUDGET. For the Fiscal Year January 1, 2019 December 31, Commission approved December 19, 2018

APEX PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT, COLORADO 2017 Budget

Fiscal Responsibility to Further Invest in the Future. Executive Committee Department of Finance May 4, 2017

Parks and Recreation. FY Budget Presentation

PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT

CITY OF LIVINGSTON ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN APPROVED 05 MARCH 2019

Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Dawn Kamalanathan, Planning and Capital Program Director

Long Term Capital Planning

Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Derek L. Chu, Director of Administration and Finance. Tiffany Wong, Budget Manager, Administration and Finance

October 4, 2007 Page 1 of 8

natural resources, and functional street system. Both are proposed to be updated through the periodic review process.

CITY OF LIVINGSTON ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN MARCH 2019

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: October 27, 2016

Introduction of the 2019 Proposed Budget December 4, 2018

IMPLEMENTATION SECTION CONTENTS: IMPLEMENTATION ACCOUNTABILITY COST ESTIMATES USING THIS DOCUMENT AMENDING THIS PLAN

Branch Buildings and Landscape Services

CITY OF SHREVEPORT 2018 Ad Valorem Tax Renewals

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SPACE PLAN PRINCIPLES, PROCESS AND ADMINISTRATOR S RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE SPACE PLAN OPTIONS

Community Services Department. 100 N. East Avenue, Reedley, CA Telephone: (559) FAX: (559)

Village of North Palm Beach Budget-in-Brief

Lakeside Park Financial Review MAY 1, 2018

MANDAN PARK BOARD Special Meeting ANNUAL BUDGET RETREAT July 18, 2018 PARK ADMIN OFFICE

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION BUDGET REVIEW OCTOBER 1, BUDGET

Chapter 8: Implementation Strategies

Closing the Gap: Investing in Neighborhood Parks

City Council Budget Work Session. City of McKinney August 4, 2017

ADOPTION OF A COST OF SERVICE AND PRICING POLICY FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND RECREATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES

MEMORANDUM. City of De Pere Citizens. Larry Delo, City Administrator. DATE: May 4, 2016

Parks & Recreation. Mission Statement. Mandates. Expenditure Budget: $35,570,456. Community Development Expenditure Budget: $162,905,334

Planning & Paying for Dynamic Parks & Recreation Systems

FY2019 PROPOSED BUDGET OVERVIEW

Sustaining Excellence Best of The Best

IMPLEMENTATION SECTION CONTENTS: IMPLEMENTATION ACCOUNTABILITY COST ESTIMATES USING THIS DOCUMENT AMENDING THIS PLAN

Contents. Ballot Measure Full Text Ballot Proposition Tax Rate Statement Impartial Analysis Statement in Favor of Measure...

2012 Strategic Business Initiatives Cooperative Extension Service Environmental and Heritage Center Health and Human Services Parks and Recreation

a) The City Manager has established a Roster for the provision of consulting services for a range of Assignments (REOI # ).

Concord s Historic Beebe House

Strategic Asset Management Policy

Ballot Measures-T Section

City of Parkland. Strategic Plan. Parkland The place families call home.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA. April 27, 2012

2017 REVENUES BY CLASSIFICATION CULTURE, RECREATION, AND EDUCATION

Millcreek City. Parks, Recreation, Trails and Open Space Impact Fee Facilities Plan DRAFT

BUDGET PRESENTATION FISCAL YEARS FISCAL

Park Maintenance Management Plan

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. DeKalb, IL

Prepared by: Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Finance Department 2117 West River Road Minneapolis, Minnesota

WHAT WE HEARD: A REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY. Budget Public Consultation September, 2018

Town Council s Strategic Priorities

Lake Mills Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

PARKS, RECREATION AND WATERFRONT DEPARTMENT FACILITIES ASSESSMENT AND FUNDING OPTIONS

Muskego Norway Schools Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

TOWN OF CARY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET OVERVIEW FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015

TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIR LONG-TERM PLAN

2013 Budget and Plan Guidelines

Performance Audit on 2008 and 2013 SPLOST Revenues For the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2012

Reference 4E General Fund Operating Budget

BRIGHAM CITY CORPORATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT

FIT Together THUNDER BAY RECREATION & FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT:

1. Approve and accept the Comprehensive Park Design for the Orange County Great Park.

Success and Failure in Implementing Strategic Plans

Transportation Planning FAQ s

Lunenburg County Public School Budget

3. Consider and act upon the minutes from the December 03, 2018 regular meeting of the Oak Point Park and Recreation Commission.

Operating Budget Overview 2019

May 7, Alain Gonthier, P.Eng. City of Ottawa Manager, Asset Management CNAM 2013

2017 ORPA Outstanding Asset Management Award Nomination

Recreation and Park Commission for the Parish of East Baton Rouge Baton Rouge, Louisiana December 31,2004

Strategic Performance Framework

MINISTRY OF TOURISM, CULTURE AND SPORT

INDOOR AQUATICS CENTER

Parks and Recreation Department

The Township of Sioux Narrows Nestor Falls. Strategic Plan and Vision Statement: Prepared by:

Geneva Park District Budget

38 th A n n u a l C o n f e r e n c e o n S c h o o l F a c i l i t i e s

2011 Annual Budget As Approved September 9, 2010

MINISTRY OF TOURISM, CULTURE AND SPORT

P AR K S AN D RECRE AT I O N

CS-1. Community Services

Capital Improvements Plan and Budget. April 10, 2012

FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT OF COOK COUNTY FY2016 EXECUTIVE BUDGET RECOMMENDATION: Analysis and Recommendations

Needs Assessment Final Report Presented to the Fairfax County Park Authority. February 2004

CITY OFANAHEIM. Community Services Department. FY 2017/18Proposed Budget. June 6, Operating Budget & Capital Improvement Program

STATUS OF ASSET MANAGEMENT IN BRITISH COLUMBIA RESULTS FROM THE 2016 GAS TAX FUND ASSET MANAGEMENT BASELINE SURVEY

RECEIVE A REPORT AND APPROVE PROPOSED PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR THE PUBLIC

Comstock Township Citizen Engagement and Priority Survey

SPECIAL EVENTS PROCEDURE

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

Infrastructure and Capital Projects Planning and Funding

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Collier Pool Public Art Project Budget: $17,500 Deadline for Submittal: January 5, 2017

Milwaukee County District Survey Results

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2001 CMR:354:01

Budget Process Overview. Juli Wiseman Finance Director June 12, 2018

Transcription:

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN INTRODUCTION The final outcome of the planning process is the implementation of the recommendations which have been made. Some recommendations do not cost the department, some save costs and some will be expensive to develop; however, in every case, the recommendations are necessary for the department to move ahead with the progress that has been demanded by the public during this past year. The Commission and staff should move forward with confidence as citizens have been outspoken about their expectations for the future of BREC. Some funding is available now to begin the process as the recently approved 10 year tax plan provides $45M, primarily for the renovation of some existing facilities. The amount of funding is not enough to meet the expectations of the public. Significant upgrades and new construction projects will be expensive, however, thus the value of having citizen awareness and support for recommended projects. This chapter provides information that identifies the key elements of the strategic plan, prioritizes their implementation by importance, identifies the accountable person, the planning and capital magnitude, suggested timeline for development, tasks, time frames for accomplishment, financial and staff resources required, responsible agencies, cost estimates and funding strategies. SOURCES OF RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations have been developed from various sources. Citizen and stakeholder comments Commissioner comments Staff comments Consultant observations and analysis Comparisons with best practices within the park and recreation profession Table 12.1 graphically portrays the various recommendations and the sources from whom they were generated. 12-1

Recommendation Improve park maintenance Develop community level parks Develop community level playgrounds Develop large indoor recreation centers Restructure the organization Increase internal revenue Upgrade existing parks Develop new park and open space facilities Formalize partnerships Develop new policies Guarantee operating funds Implement the Natural Resources Plan Staff development and training Table 12.1: Sources of Recommendations Citizens and Commissioners Staff Consultant Best Stakeholders Practices X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Criteria for development of recommendations The Implementation Plan contains strategies that respond to the values and goals which were identified during the planning process. The values and goals are displayed in Table?? 12-2

Table 12.2: Criteria for development of recommendations Values Goals Equity in facilities and programs Connectivity provide a safe and connected park system Respect for the past Accessibility parks and facilities designed to facilitate equal community access Citizen based planning Community level parks and playgrounds Quality facilities and programming Maximize resources Environmental stewardship Quality programs, parks and facilities are provided at a high level Cultural diversity Inclusion program, parks and facilities are provided for everyone Value of partners Close to home opportunities Safe and secure parks Systemwide Strategies Strategies have been developed which work together to provide citizens with the outcomes they have requested during the planning process. The first three strategic goals are recommended as high priorities because their emphasis is on staff, its partners within the Parish and selected policies which guide the department in its daily management and decision-making process. From an implementation perspective, the department must have its staff in the right positions and ready to utilize its resources in an efficient and effective manner. Because BREC provides services directly, and works with its partners to facilitate services, as if they are an extension of staff, thus the need to get them on board with the Strategic Plan and its intent to provide quality services to the citizens. Finally, it is important to provide the guidance that staff needs to implement the plan through its policies which are also a part of this plan. Strategic Goal #1 An agency whose organizational structure and staff capabilities are in alignment with the requirements necessary to implement the plan. Strategy 1.1: Reduce the number of staff reporting to the Superintendent Reduce the number of staff reporting directly to the Superintendent from 7 to 5. Create a new position of Assistant Superintendent responsible for recreation programs, outreach, the zoo and golf. Positions reporting to the Superintendent to include the Deputy Superintendent, a new position of Assistant Superintendent, Directors of Finance, Human Resources and Communications. 12-3

Strategy 1.2: Maximize resources and improve services within the Recreation and Community Resource Departments. Consolidate the Recreation and Community Resource Departments Strategy 1.3: Improve service delivery to BREC patrons Provide a mandatory staff meeting to present the strategic plan s recommendations and their impact on the organization Initiate a staff development and training program which includes, as a minimum, the recommendations in this plan; i.e. teamwork, creative thinking, activity based costing, performance measures, customer service, personal development, communication skills, marketing. Strategic Goal #2 An agency whose formal partnerships allow for improved utilization of limited resources and services within the Parish. Strategy 2.1: Invite key potential partners into the planning process. Potential key partners which have been identified include: United Way Agencies Sports Associations Hobbyists Strategy 2.2: Hold an annual meeting of all current and future partners to discuss partnership opportunities. Strategy 2.3: Discuss a formal partnership agreement with each group. A formal partnership agreement has been provided in the Appendix of this Plan and provides detail about the most important elements of a successful partnership. Name or organization/agency Contact persons names and numbers Location of the project/program Public/age group/sex served Start/end date of agreement Identify goals/outcomes of each partner (both the city, recreation department and partner) How will goals be measured, by whom and when What are dollar contributions of each partner (personal services, supplies, equipment, facilities, cash commitment, other) Expected revenue of the city, recreation department and community partner How will ongoing communication be addressed? Insurance requirements Strategy 2.4: Formalize partnerships 12-4

After due diligence, appropriate partners should enter into a formal agreement with BREC. Partnership agreements should be re-visited on an annual basis to determine if it is still a win/win opportunity for each party. Strategic Goal #3 An agency whose policies provide the political support and direction for staff which is required to implement the plan. Strategy 3.1: As was stated in Strategy 1.2, citizens will receive improved services by the implementation of a staff development and training program. Strategy 3.2: The strategic plan recommends an increase of internal revenue form its current level of 25% to a range between 25% and 35%. A formal Cost Recovery Policy which is citizen driven provides the best chance to make the necessary changes for increased cost recovery. A Cost Recovery Policy is included in the Appendix of the plan. The process for implementing a plan is generally outlined here: All costs must be identified for each program that BREC offers Programs and services provided by BREC must be categorized by: public, merit and private Public services are typically offered at no charge Merit services typically split costs between the agency and the user Private services typically recover 100% of direct costs Strategy 3.3: Partnership Agreements The details of partnership agreements were provided in Strategy 2.2 Strategic goal #4 emphasizes citizen preferences for taking care of what they currently have. The recent passage of the 10 year tax plan has provided funding in the amount of $45 million to make routine improvements throughout the park system, although additional funds will be required to address the future needs in the system. Strategic goal # 4 An agency which recognizes the importance of taking care of its existing parks and facilities. Strategy 4.1: Existing community parks will be upgraded to meet development requirements for parks of their type. Improvements to include: Paving of parking lots and drives Family facilities Lighting Restrooms Water fountains 12-5

Strategy 4.2: Several existing recreation centers will be upgraded and some re-focused to use by others. Six centers will be expanded and upgraded to provide air conditioning, more space and amenities for recreation programming and community events. Five centers will be re-focused for use by others such as hobbyists. Strategy 4.3: Fishing areas will be upgraded. Strategy 4.4: Swimming Pools will be upgraded. Strategy 4.5: Shade trees will be planted. Strategy 4.6: Special Use Facilities will be upgraded. Bluebonnet Swamp Cohn Arboretum Farr Horse Activity Center Goldsby Field Golf Courses Independence Park Botanic Garden Magnolia Cemetery Memorial Field Lakes District Observatory Olympia Field Zoo Strategic goal #5 addresses the need to have a dependable source of operating funds which are not subjected to frequent voter approval. It is always recommended, however, that voters approve capital funding. Strategic goal #5 An agency whose operating funds are dependable. Strategy 5.1: A public education effort should present the facts about having an operating budget which is subjected to voter approval Strategy 5.2: Following a public education effort, BREC should proceed with its legal counsel to remove the stipulation that requires voter approval of the operating fund from the next tax election Strategic goal #6 addresses the need to protect the cultural, historical and natural resources within the Parish. 12-6

Strategic goal #6 An agency who recognizes the value of its cultural, historical and natural resources and the delicate balance between providing recreation, park and open space opportunities while protecting its resources. Strategy 6.1: The Horizon Plan should be endorsed and implemented. Strategy 6.2: The Natural Resource Management Plan should be endorsed and implemented. Strategic goal #7 addresses the need to develop new parks and facilities within the Parish. Strategic goal #7 An agency whose park system is sufficient to accommodate land requirements and new facilities which citizens are supportive of. Strategy 7.1: Trails will be developed which connect major parks and points of interest within the Parish. A variety of trails will be used to accomplish this goal and will include: Greenways/blueways Connecting facilities Fitness trails/walking facilities Nature trails Strategy 7.2: Contemporary (mega) recreation centers will be placed in three strategic locations within the Parish to best meet the needs of the Parish. Conceptually, it appears that one in the north, south and central part of the Parish will work best. Contemporary centers should range between 60,000 and 75,000 sq. ft. Strategy 7.3: Splash pads should be developed at six locations throughout the Parish. The splash pads will provide a close-to-home, affordable and popular aquatic-type opportunity for users which is different than a swimming pool or leisure pool experience. Strategy 7.4: A new aquatic center with competitive lanes will be constructed within the Parish at a location which is yet to be determined. Strategy 7.5: New fishing areas will be developed. Strategy 7.6: New park land will be acquired. Strategy 7.7: New sports facilities will be developed. A new sport facility at Sherwood Forrest Park with 8 baseball fields and 4 soccer fields A new sport facility to be developed in the Central Area A new sport facility to be developed in the Zachary Area 12-7

Five baseball/softball fields to be developed at Burbank Park One dedicated, lighted football field will be built The Burbank Park soccer complex will be improved Strategy 7.8: New special use facilities will be developed to meet citizen expectations. Skatepark Dog park (s) Hobbyists Implementation Plan Summary The attached spreadsheet summarizes the Implementation Plan by identifying the strategic goal, its priority when compared against other goals, development costs, new staff requirements, operating costs, funding source, responsible party and time frame. 12-8

Chapter 12 Implementation Plan Strategic Goal Priority Table 12.3: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SUMMARY SHEET New Annual Development Staff Operating Cost Requirements Costs Funding Source Responsible Person Time Frame Strategic Goal #1: Organizational Restructuring 1 0 Superintendent 1st year create a new position of Assistant Superintendent staff time 1 $100,000 Operating Budget Superintendent 1st year reduce staff reporting to the Superintendent staff time 0 $0 n/a Superintendent 1st year consolidate the Community Resources and Recreation Depts. staff time 0 $0 n/a Superintendent 1st year reduce recreation areas from six to three staff time -6 $0 n/a Assistant Superintendent 1 thru 2 Strategic Goal #2: Partnership Development 2 staff time 0 $0 n/a Assistant Superintendent 1st year Strategic Goal #3: Policy Development 3 Superintendent cost recovery policy staff time 0 -$2,000,000 new revenue to the operating budget Director of Finance / Superintendent 1st year cost avoidance to the partnership policy staff time 1 $50,000 operating budget Assistant Superintendent 1st year staff development and training policy (1.8% Ind Avg) staff time 0 $150,000 Operating Budget Dir Human Resources/Dept Heads 1st year Strategic Goal #4: Upgrade and Maintenance of Park System 4 upgrade existing parks $17,600,000 1 $705,100 GF / C.I.P. Plan P&E and Operations 1 thru 10 upgrade six existing recreation centers $15,000,000 6 $450,000 GF / C.I.P. Plan P&E and Operations 1 thru 10 upgrade existing fishing areas $350,000 0 $0 GF / C.I.P. Plan P&E and Operations 1 thru 10 renovate existing pools $1,500,000 0 $0 GF / C.I.P. Plan P&E and Operations 1 thru 10 replace shade trees $100,000 0 $25,000 GF / C.I.P. Plan P&E and Operations 1 thru 10 upgrade neighborhood parks $4,000,000 0 $0 GF / C.I.P. Plan P&E and Operations 1 thru 10 upgrade special use facilities $11,900,000 3 $156,500 GF / C.I.P. Plan P&E and Operations 1 thru 10 Strategic Goal #5: Dependable operating funds 5 $0 0 -$25,000 n/a Commission/Superintendent/Voters 1 thru 2 Strategic Goal #6: Cultural, Historical and Natural Resources 6 $7,500,000 5 $350,000 voter referendum Natural Resource Dept 2 thru 10 Strategic Goal #7: Land acquisition and new facilities 7 trails $5,350,000 1 $160,500 Voter referendum Director of Planning & Engineering 2 thru 10 large recreation centers $29,000,000 45 $2,900,000 Voter referendum Director of Planning & Engineering 2 thru 10 splash pads $1,800,000 1 $180,000 Voter referendum Director of Planning & Engineering 2 thru 10 aquatic center with competitive lanes $9,800,000 15 $380,000 Voter referendum Director of Planning & Engineering 2 thru 10 fishing areas $1,000,000 0 $20,000 Voter referendum Director of Planning & Engineering 2 thru 10 park land $5,000,000 1 $0 Voter referendum Director of Planning & Engineering 2 thru 10 sports facilities $11,950,000 6 $717,000 Voter referendum Director of Planning & Engineering 2 thru 10 Strategic Goal #8: New special use facilities 8 skatepark, dog park $3,000,000 1 $90,000 Voter referendum Director of Planning & Engineering 2 thru 10 refocus 5 recreation centers for hobbyists $0-5 -$125,000 cost avoidance to operating budget Assistant Superintendent 1 thru 2 Totals $124,850,000 76 $4,284,100 12-9