AMERICAN OPTIONS REVIEW OF STOPPING TIMES. Important example: the first passage time for continuous process X:

Similar documents
MARTINGALES AND LOCAL MARTINGALES

Math 6810 (Probability) Fall Lecture notes

CONTINUOUS TIME PRICING AND TRADING: A REVIEW, WITH SOME EXTRA PIECES

Lecture 3: Review of mathematical finance and derivative pricing models

Last Time. Martingale inequalities Martingale convergence theorem Uniformly integrable martingales. Today s lecture: Sections 4.4.1, 5.

STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS

PDE Methods for the Maximum Drawdown

The British Russian Option

Path Dependent British Options

Hedging under Arbitrage

MASM006 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS.

Lévy models in finance

Optimal trading strategies under arbitrage

LECTURE 4: BID AND ASK HEDGING

Stochastic Finance - A Numeraire Approach

Pricing theory of financial derivatives

Non-semimartingales in finance

1.1 Basic Financial Derivatives: Forward Contracts and Options

AMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING. Contents

MATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS

Lecture Notes for Chapter 6. 1 Prototype model: a one-step binomial tree

Definition Pricing Risk management Second generation barrier options. Barrier Options. Arfima Financial Solutions

Approximating Early Exercise Boundaries for American Options

Risk Neutral Measures

In chapter 5, we approximated the Black-Scholes model

Dynamic Protection for Bayesian Optimal Portfolio

Lecture 4. Finite difference and finite element methods

Chapter 1. Introduction and Preliminaries. 1.1 Motivation. The American put option problem

Economathematics. Problem Sheet 1. Zbigniew Palmowski. Ws 2 dw s = 1 t

MSC FINANCIAL ENGINEERING PRICING I, AUTUMN LECTURE 6: EXTENSIONS OF BLACK AND SCHOLES RAYMOND BRUMMELHUIS DEPARTMENT EMS BIRKBECK

Martingale Approach to Pricing and Hedging

Black-Scholes Option Pricing

Barrier options. In options only come into being if S t reaches B for some 0 t T, at which point they become an ordinary option.

PAPER 211 ADVANCED FINANCIAL MODELS

FINANCIAL OPTIMIZATION. Lecture 5: Dynamic Programming and a Visit to the Soft Side

Credit Risk : Firm Value Model

Pricing Dynamic Solvency Insurance and Investment Fund Protection

RMSC 4005 Stochastic Calculus for Finance and Risk. 1 Exercises. (c) Let X = {X n } n=0 be a {F n }-supermartingale. Show that.

Pricing in markets modeled by general processes with independent increments

Lecture 11: Ito Calculus. Tuesday, October 23, 12

Basic Arbitrage Theory KTH Tomas Björk

Lecture Quantitative Finance Spring Term 2015

M5MF6. Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing

Lecture 8: The Black-Scholes theory

Optimal robust bounds for variance options and asymptotically extreme models

θ(t ) = T f(0, T ) + σ2 T

Hedging Credit Derivatives in Intensity Based Models

MORE REALISTIC FOR STOCKS, FOR EXAMPLE

Partial differential approach for continuous models. Closed form pricing formulas for discretely monitored models

MARGIN CALL STOCK LOANS

Option Pricing Models for European Options

Sensitivity of American Option Prices with Different Strikes, Maturities and Volatilities

Change of Measure (Cameron-Martin-Girsanov Theorem)

Dynamic Principal Agent Models: A Continuous Time Approach Lecture II

Optimization Models in Financial Mathematics

Arbitrage Bounds for Volatility Derivatives as Free Boundary Problem. Bruno Dupire Bloomberg L.P. NY

Multiple Optimal Stopping Problems and Lookback Options

Advanced topics in continuous time finance

Remarks on American Options for Jump Diffusions

4. Black-Scholes Models and PDEs. Math6911 S08, HM Zhu

Martingale Measure TA

Stochastic modelling of electricity markets Pricing Forwards and Swaps

Math489/889 Stochastic Processes and Advanced Mathematical Finance Solutions to Practice Problems

Help Session 2. David Sovich. Washington University in St. Louis

Derivative Securities Fall 2012 Final Exam Guidance Extended version includes full semester

Real Options and Free-Boundary Problem: A Variational View

A note on the existence of unique equivalent martingale measures in a Markovian setting

BLACK SCHOLES THE MARTINGALE APPROACH

Additional questions for chapter 3

Extensions to the Black Scholes Model

MAS452/MAS6052. MAS452/MAS Turn Over SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS. Stochastic Processes and Financial Mathematics

BIRKBECK (University of London) MSc EXAMINATION FOR INTERNAL STUDENTS MSc FINANCIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, MATHEMATICS AND STATIS- TICS

Option Pricing with Delayed Information

Ten Different Ways to Derive Black Scholes

The Derivation and Discussion of Standard Black-Scholes Formula

PAPER 27 STOCHASTIC CALCULUS AND APPLICATIONS

The Forward PDE for American Puts in the Dupire Model

Forward Dynamic Utility

Robust Pricing and Hedging of Options on Variance

Hedging under arbitrage

Illiquidity, Credit risk and Merton s model

The stochastic calculus

- 1 - **** d(lns) = (µ (1/2)σ 2 )dt + σdw t

last problem outlines how the Black Scholes PDE (and its derivation) may be modified to account for the payment of stock dividends.

PAijpam.eu ANALYTIC SOLUTION OF A NONLINEAR BLACK-SCHOLES EQUATION

KØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET (Blok 2, 2011/2012) Naturvidenskabelig kandidateksamen Continuous time finance (FinKont) TIME ALLOWED : 3 hours

NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS, STATISTICS & PHYSICS SEMESTER 1 SPECIMEN 2 MAS3904. Stochastic Financial Modelling. Time allowed: 2 hours

M.I.T Fall Practice Problems

13.3 A Stochastic Production Planning Model

The British Binary Option

Lecture 3. Sergei Fedotov Introduction to Financial Mathematics. Sergei Fedotov (University of Manchester) / 6

On the pricing equations in local / stochastic volatility models

EARLY EXERCISE OPTIONS WITH DISCONTINUOUS PAYOFF

Basic Concepts and Examples in Finance

Queens College, CUNY, Department of Computer Science Computational Finance CSCI 365 / 765 Fall 2017 Instructor: Dr. Sateesh Mane.

Singular Stochastic Control Models for Optimal Dynamic Withdrawal Policies in Variable Annuities

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 11 10/9/2013. Martingales and stopping times II

Lecture 17. The model is parametrized by the time period, δt, and three fixed constant parameters, v, σ and the riskless rate r.

MSc Financial Engineering CHRISTMAS ASSIGNMENT: MERTON S JUMP-DIFFUSION MODEL. To be handed in by monday January 28, 2013

Fractional Black - Scholes Equation

Transcription:

AMERICAN OPTIONS REVIEW OF STOPPING TIMES τ is stopping time if {τ t} F t for all t Important example: the first passage time for continuous process X: τ m = min{t 0 : X(t) = m} (τ m = if X(t) never takes the value m This is a stopping time (see Sect 8.2 of Shreve) Optional sampling theorem: Let τ be a stopping time. If (M t ) is a martingale (submartingale, supermartingele), then (M τ t ) is a martingale (submartingale, supermartingele) Winter 2005 1 Per A. Mykland

THE PERPETUAL AMERICAN PUT Process: ds t = rs t dt + σs t dw t T = all stopping times that take value in [0, ] Value of perpetual put: v (x) = max τ T E [e rτ (K S τ ) + I {τ< } S 0 = x] = max τ T E [e rτ (K S τ )I {τ< } S 0 = x] The last equality: no point in exercising if S t > K Reasonable to exercise when S t hits some level L What is L? What is the price v (x)? Winter 2005 2 Per A. Mykland

INTERMEDIATE PROBLEM Hitting time: τ L = min{t 0 : S(t) = L} v L (x) = E [e rτ L (K S τl )I {τl < } S 0 = x] Program: find v L (x), then find value L which maximizes v L (x) This is simpler, since v L (x) does not involve any maximization over stopping times Since S τl = L on {τ L < }: v L (x) = E [e rτ L (K L)I {τl < } S 0 = x] which depends only on distribution of τ L One derivation for this price: Shreve Section 8.3.1 (more elegant) We shall use: Winter Lecture 1 (brute force) Winter 2005 3 Per A. Mykland

Set X t = log S t log S 0 and ν = r 1 2 σ2 Then X t = νt + σw t Hitting time τ = min{t : X t = b} From Lecture 1 (p. 16): density of τ: f τ (t) = Since S 0 = x: ( b 2πσ2 t exp b2 3 2σ 2 t + ν σ 2 b 1 2 ν 2 ) σ 2 t S τl = L <=> X τl = log(l) log(x) And so τ = τ L if b = log(l) log(x) = log(x/l) Winter 2005 4 Per A. Mykland

For x L: BACK TO ORIGINAL PROBLEM v L (x) = E [e rτ L (K L)I {τl < } S 0 = x] = e rt (K L)f(t)dt 0 ( ) 2rb = (K L) exp = (K L) σ 2 ( x L) 2r σ 2 Obviously, for x L: v L (x) = (K x) (exercise immediately) Winter 2005 5 Per A. Mykland

OPTIMAL VALUE OF L { 2r v L (x) = (K L)L σ 2 x 2r σ 2 for x L (K x) otherwise For fixed x: maximize with respect to L: where 2r (K L)L σ L 2 = L 2r σ 2 = 2r (K L)L σ L 2 L = 2r + σ2 σ 2 + 2r 2r (K L)L σ σ2 2 1 L 2r σ 2 + 2r 2r KL σ σ2 2 1 = 0 <=> L = L 2r 2r + σ 2 K This corresponds to a maximum of (K L)L 2r σ 2 since only stationary point and since (K L)L 2r σ 2 = 0 for L = 0 and (K L)L 2r σ 2 as L. Winter 2005 6 Per A. Mykland

ANALYTIC CHARACTERIZATION OF PUT PRICE v L (x) = { (K L )(x/l ) 2r σ 2 (K x) otherwise for x L Hence v L (x) = { (K L ) 2r σ 2 x (x/l ) 2r σ 2 1 otherwise for x L Right derivative at L : v L (L +) = (K L ) 2r σ 2 L = 1 v L (x) is continuous at L : smooth pasting Winter 2005 7 Per A. Mykland

CAN VERIFY DIRECTLY THAT (i) v L (x) (K x) + for all x 0 (ii) rv L (x) rxv L (x) 1 2 σ2 x 2 v L (x) 0 for all x 0 (iii) for each x 0, one of (i) or (ii) is an equality (i)-(iii) (complementarity conditions) determine v L (x) TRADING INTERPRETATION d[e rt v L (S t )] = e rt [ rv L (S t )dt + v L (S t )ds t + 1 2 v L (S t )d[s, S] t ] = v L (S t )d S t d D t where, since d S t = d[e rt S t ] = re rt S t dt + e rt ds t : d D t = e rt [ rv L (S t )dt rv L (S t )S t 1 2 v L (S t )d[s, S] t ] = e [rv rt L (S t )dt rv L (S t )S t dt 1 ] 2 v L (S t )σ 2 St 2 dt 0 by (ii) (ii) (i) + (ii) means that v L (S t ) is a superreplication of the American option Winter 2005 8 Per A. Mykland

STRUCTURE OF THE DIVIDEND Precise form of (ii) (for all x 0 rv L (x) rxv L (x) 1 2 σ2 x 2 v L (x) = { 0 if x > L rk if x < L Hence d D t = e rt [rv L (S t ) rv L (S t )S t 1 2 v L (S t )σ 2 S 2 t ] dt = e rt rki {St <L }dt FINANCIAL INTERPRETATION The hedging strategy pays a dividend of rk $ for when S t < L. This is arbitrage profit if the owner of the option does not exercise at time τ L PROBABILISTIC INTERPRETATION M t = e rt v L (S t ) is a supermartingale with Doob-Meyer decomposition v L (S t )d S t d D t M τl t is a martingale Winter 2005 9 Per A. Mykland

FINALLY: v L (x) = v (x) Proof: Since e rt v L (S t ) is a supermartingale: For any stopping time τ T and so v L (x) = v L (S 0 ) E [e r(τ t) v L (S τ t )] E [e rτ v L (S τ )] (as t ) v L (x) max τ T E [e rτ v L (S τ )] = v (x) On the other hand, since τ L T The equality follows v (x) = max τ T E [e rτ v L (S τ )] E [e rτ L vl (S τl )] = v L (x) Winter 2005 10 Per A. Mykland

THE REGULAR AMERICAN PUT Exercise time τ must be T v(t, x) = max τ T t,t E [e r(τ t) (K S τ ) + S t = x] where T t,t is the set of all stopping times taking values in [t, T ] Winter 2005 11 Per A. Mykland

ANALYTIC CRITERIA FROM TRADING INTERPRETATION Solvency requires: v(t, S t ) (K S t ) +, or (i) v(x, t) (K x) + Replication considerations. Ito s formula: d[e rt v(t, S t )] = v x (t, S t )d S t d D t Where d D t = e [rv(t, rt S t ) v t (t, S t ) rs t v x (t, S t ) 1 ] 2 σ2 St 2 v xx (t, S t ) dt Superreplication requires: d D t 0, or (ii) rv(t, x) v t (t, x) rxv x (t, x) 1 2 σ2 x 2 v xx (t, x) 0 Getting the lowest price: (iii) for each x 0, one of (i) or (ii) is an equality (otherwise one could lower v(x,t) and still have a solvent superreplication) (i)-(iii): the complementarity conditions again Winter 2005 12 Per A. Mykland

STOPPING AND CONTINUATION REGIONS Stopping region: S = {(t, x) : v(t, x) = (K x) + } Continuation region: C = {(t, x) : v(t, x) > (K x) + } Rationale: If (t, S t ) C: exercise value. Keep it. option is worth more than On the other hand, if v(t, x) = (K x) + : rv(t, x) v t (t, x) rxv x (t, x) 1 2 σ2 x 2 v xx (t, x) = rk Hence if (t, S t ) S: d D t = e [rv(t, rt S t ) v t (t, S t ) rs t v x (t, S t ) 1 ] 2 σ2 St 2 v xx (t, S t ) dt = rkdt You re being arbitraged. Get rid of it. Winter 2005 13 Per A. Mykland

STRUCTURE OF THE DIVIDEND rv(t, x) v t (t, x) rxv x (t, x) 1 2 σ2 x 2 v xx (t, x) = { 0 for (t, x) C rk for (t, x) S Hence, as before: d D t = rki {(t,st ) S}dt STOPPING RULE τ = min{t [0, T ] : (t, S t ) S} M t = e rt v(s t, t) is a supermartingale with Doob-Meyer decomposition v x (S t, t)d S t d D t M τ t is a martingale Winter 2005 14 Per A. Mykland

STOPPING BOUNDARY Stopping region: S = {(t, x) : v(t, x) = (K x) + } Continuation region: C = {(t, x) : v(t, x) > (K x) + } Boundary: x = L(T t): (t, x) S iff x L(T t) (t, x) C iff x > L(T t) smooth pasting continues to hold: v x (x+, t) = v x (x, t) = 1 for x = L(T t), for t < T Winter 2005 15 Per A. Mykland

AMERICAN CALL OPTIONS CASE OF NO DIVIDEND The calculations from the discrete case (Autumn Lecture 5) carry over. The value is the same as for European options WITH DIVIDEND AT DISCRETE TIMES Reduces to a discrete time problem. Between dividend times, reduces to a European options problem Winter 2005 16 Per A. Mykland