Adverse Effect Policy

Similar documents
Effective Date 7 06 Feb 2018 Incorporating EPA assessment activity Due to IMI expanding its services

Please see separate fee s that apply to Enquiry on results requests in our Ascentis Fees and Prices catalogue that is available on our website

Active IQ Centre Appeals Policy

Centre Manual. Version 7.2 April 2018

Qualsafe Awards Centre Agreement

CILEx Security of Examination Scripts Updated June 2014

The Appeals Process: Information for Centres

Risk and Issue Management Policy

Pearson LCCI Level 4 Certificate in Financial Accounting (VRQ)

Pearson LCCI Level 4 Certificate in Financial Accounting (VRQ)

Special Consideration Policy and Procedure for Financial Capability Qualifications

Pearson LCCI Level 2 Certificate in Bookkeeping and Accounting (VRQ)

Interim Regulatory Whistleblowing Policy

ILM Enquiries and Appeals Policy. V2 November 2017

Sports Leaders UK Requested Centre Withdrawal Policy and procedure

Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual) Supplementary Estimate 2018/19

Pearson LCCI Level 3 Certificate in Advanced Business Calculations (ASE3003)

Understanding how a retail business maintains health, safety and security on its premises

Conflict of Interest Policy. COI-P-V5 July Copyright 2017 Qualsafe Awards. All rights reserved

OCR Phase II Audit Protocol Breach Notification. HIPAA COW Spring Conference 2017 Page 1 Boerner Consulting, LLC

Wine Plus+ WSET Policies & Procedures

.ALTERNATIVE. LOCATIONS.AND..SUBCONTRACTORS..POLICY. Version 1.0

Pearson LCCI Level 3 Certificate in Cost and Management Accounting (VRQ)

SUB-CONTRACTING POLICY POLICY NO. 34

CMI MANAGEMENT QUALIFICATIONS

ERO Enterprise Self- Logging Program

TONGA NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND ACCREDITATION BOARD

General Student Terms and Conditions. Version 2

City & Guilds Manual for the End-Point Assessment Service

UNSW GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES

P9 Record Retention Policy 2018 [1]

Policy and procedures for processing and issuing results, certificates and medals

North East Surrey College of Technology. Sub Contracting Supply Chain. Fees and Charging Policy

Risk Management Policy

Data Protection Policy

JFSC Risk Overview: Our approach to risk-based supervision

Interim Date: July 21, 2015 Revised: July 1, 2015

TTR 1 Record. Student s name: Student s signature: Client number:

1.1. In these Conditions the following terms shall have the following meaning:-

Enquiries and Appeals for Qualifications The process and how to apply


Risk Management at the Deutsche Bundesbank March 2011

BCS Professional Certificate in Business Finance Syllabus Version 1.2 December 2016

Standardisation Policy

WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY

POLICY SUMMARY FORM. Unit(s) Responsible for Policy Implementation: Vice President for Finance and Administration

1 Higher National Unit credit at SCQF level 7: (8 SCQF credit points at SCQF level 7)

Reporting of relevant matters of interest to UK charity regulators. A guide for auditors and independent examiners

Modern Apprenticeship Programme Specification Published 29 March 2019

Risk Management Policy and Procedure

Context The policy is now a mandatory requirement that must be in place prior to participating in any subcontracting activity from 1 August 2014.

SECURITY POLICY 1. Security of Services. 2. Subscriber Security Administration. User Clearance User Authorization User Access Limitations

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE AUSTRALIAN TRANSACTION REPORTS AND ANALYSIS CENTRE Applicant STATEMENT OF AGREED FACTS AND ADMISSIONS

RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Internal Audit Incident Management Review

INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF NAMIBIA

WESTMINSTER ADULT EDUCATION SERVICE. Subcontractor Management Fee Policy

Reporting of Safety Related Information

Risk Management Plan Project Name: Version 1.0 Date: dd/mm/yyyy

The Police and Crime Commissioner for Staffordshire and Chief Constable for Staffordshire. Annual Audit Letter for the year ended 31 March 2017

Hearing held in public. Summary. For the remainder of the duration of the High Court extension

Attachment F. Communications Protocols for Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. s Competitive Bidding Process Auctions

FINAL NOTICE Alpari confirmed on 22 April 2010 that it would not refer the matter to the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber).

PROCEDURE. This procedure is intended to identify third party arrangements and red flags involving College activities that will:

Quality and Qualifications Ireland

APES 345 Reporting on Prospective Financial Information prepared in connection with a Public Document

Risk Management Policy

GSRMA member agencies can earn an award of up to 10% of the current year s contribution, subject to a $50,000 maximum per member agency, per year.

SBI Canada Bank Privacy Policy

Safe Satellite Application Pack and Contract November 2018

Basel II Briefing: Pillar 2 Preparations. Considerations on Pillar 2 for Subsidiary Banks

PARMITER S SCHOOL INTERNAL APPEALS PROCEDURE. This policy relates to appeals against decisions in the following areas:

Unit title PAYE, Income Tax and National Insurance Contributions SQA code H70X 04. SCQF level 7. SCQF credit points

Countering Fraud in Student Funding Catherine Haggerty Team Manager

PROFESSIONAL STANDARD 2 (PS2) THE ACTUARIAL SOCIETY OF HONG KONG 香港精算學會

Code of Professional Ethics: independence provisions relating to review and assurance engagements

CBA and AUSTRAC resolve AML/CTF proceedings subject to Federal Court approval

Risk Management Policy and Framework

Risks and uncertainties facing the business

We consider that Article 7.3 should be clarified for the following reasons:

BREACH NOTIFICATION POLICY

HIPAA: Impact on Corporate Compliance

SCOTTISH QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY

Pearson LCCI Level 4 Certificate in Management Accounting (VRQ)

Fundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F8. Section B

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR RESPONDING TO FINANCIAL EMERGENCIES WITHIN THE SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (Revised)

Protection of Enrolled Learners (PEL): Protocols for the Implementation of Part 6 of the 2012 Act Guidelines for Providers

IV:07:11 IDENTITY THEFT PREVENTION POLICY SECTION 1: BACKGROUND

The DFSA Sourcebook. Regulatory Policy and Process. (RPP Sourcebook) Appendix 1

Consultation Paper. on Draft Guidelines on fraud reporting requirements under Article 96(6) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2) EBA/CP/2017/13

Edelweiss Tokio Life Insurance Company Limited ANTI FRAUD POLICY

CAMBRIDGE ASSESSMENT ENGLISH EXAMINATIONS EXAMINATION DATES 2019

Delegate Booking Form

4.4 These subjects are discussed under the following headings:

Public Disclosure. To know more about our Company's history, our profile and business objectives, please click on the below link.

CLIENT MONEY AND ASSETS POLICY

Ethics Pronouncement EP 100

JC/GL/2017/ September Final Guidelines

Subject CP1 Actuarial Practice Core Practices Syllabus

Transcription:

Adverse Effect Policy January 2019 Version 6

Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Identification and management of risk... 3 2.1. Identifying risk... 3 2.2. Quality assurance centre risk register... 3 2.3. Targeting strategy Unannounced spot checks... 3 2.4. Confirmation... 3 3. Prevent and mitigate... 3 4. Management of incidents... 4 5. Reporting Adverse Effects... 4 6. Notifiable events... 4 7. Notification to the regulators... 5 Adverse Effect Policy_v6 January 2019 Page 2 of 7

1. Introduction This policy describes the steps VTCT takes around the identification, prevention, mitigation and reporting of Adverse Effects. 2. Identification and management of risk 2.1. Identifying risk Identifying potential risk that could have an Adverse Effect Preventing incidents from occurring, or mitigate the Adverse Effect as far as possible Establishing and maintaining a contingency plan 2.2. Quality assurance centre risk register All approved centres are risk rated and risk ratings are recorded in the CRM. Centre risk ratings are updated as new information is received by the quality assurance team. The EQAs undertake a minimum of two risk-based external quality assurance monitoring visits to centres in each academic year. The EQA completes a report for each visit and the reports are collated by the quality assurance team and attached to centre records on the CRM. Each report includes a risk summary and the centre will be rated overall to be the highest risk revealed during the visit and recorded as low, medium or high risk. VTCT apply appropriate sanctions against medium and high-risk centres. 2.3. Targeting strategy Unannounced spot checks Unannounced spot checks are managed on a risk-based approach by VTCT s Quality and Processing Manager. Visit plans are agreed and implemented when the centre risk register reports increased risk highlighted by intelligence received. Any increased risk raises concern that the validity, reliability and integrity in the delivery and or assessment of qualifications taken by registered VTCT learners may be compromised and could lead to an Adverse Effect. 2.4. Confirmation VTCT will review evidence to determine whether or not an incident could have or lead to an Adverse Effect. 3. Prevent and mitigate VTCT s Responsible Officer (RO) will meet with an appropriate group of VTCT personnel, to determine whether or not an incident is reportable as an Adverse Effect. The group is likely to include senior representation from the Assessment and Qualification teams as well as Quality Assurance and will aim to establish the impact on centres and learners and agree any steps that VTCT has taken, or intends to take, to prevent the event having an Adverse Effect, or to correct or mitigate that Adverse Effect if it occurs. Adverse Effect Policy_v6 January 2019 Page 3 of 7

Each example of an incident that could lead to an Adverse Effect will be managed and reported on a case by case basis taking account of any trends established. VTCT s RO will make the final decision regarding any notification requirement. In line with the requirement to notify other AO's who may potentially be affected by an Adverse Effect VTCT will notify other Awarding Organisations as required by Condition A8.7b. 4. Management of incidents Where an incident occurs which could have an Adverse Effect, VTCT will promptly take all reasonable steps to prevent the Adverse Effect and, where any Adverse Effect occurs, mitigate it as far as possible and correct it. Condition A7.1 (a); and give priority to the provision of assessments which accurately differentiate between Learners on the basis of the level of attainment they have demonstrated and to the accurate and timely award of qualifications. Condition A7.1 (b). The Adverse Effect Policy is applied when incidents that may have an Adverse Effect occur and are reported. The Adverse Effect Policy applies to internal and external incidents caused as a result of VTCT, or centres, failing to manage and apply related processes and practice intended to prevent or reduce the likelihood of an Adverse Effect. Incidents can be due to VTCT staff, process or system error and or failure of centres inadvertently (Maladministration) or deliberately (Malpractice) failing to apply VTCT policy. 5. Reporting Adverse Effects Quality assurance has overall responsibility for reporting non-compliances that have had or are likely to have an Adverse Effect. The team may also report any potential non-compliance that may result in an Adverse Effect, although in examples of this type the Compliance team will undertake further inquiries to gather conclusive evidence that an Adverse Effect has occurred and the findings will support whether the incident is reportable as an Adverse Effect or whether it falls into another category. In examples where the Compliance team do not consider that the incident had resulted in an Adverse Effect but that improvement is required to strengthen a process or practice VTCT s Quality and Processing Manager will set an Action/Improvement plan that must be agreed by the centre and completed within specified times set within the plan. VTCT will support centre improvement plans when possible. Quality assurance logs all cases and report trends and increased level of risk. 6. Notifiable events VTCT apply the requirements by the Regulators. Key reference points include Condition B3 Notification to the Regulators of certain events - notification where an event could have an Adverse Effect. B3.1 An awarding organisation must promptly notify the Regulator when it has cause to believe that any event has occurred or is likely to occur which could have an Adverse Effect. Adverse Effect Policy_v6 January 2019 Page 4 of 7

Condition B3.2 provides specific examples of events which could have an Adverse Effect. The decision-making process can often be complex and challenging. Therefore an informed decision will be supported by evidence and professional judgement as a result of discussions with key personnel. In any case, where new evidence becomes available to VTCT that identifies the increased likelihood that an incident will have, or has resulted in an Adverse Effect, VTCT will provide a rationale explaining why VTCT did not consider that an Adverse Effect had occurred at the time of the investigation. 7. Notification to the regulators VTCT will notify the regulator(s) (Ofqual, CCEA, Qualifications Wales and SQA accreditation) who regulate the qualification relating to the incident that has occurred or is likely to occur which could have an Adverse Effect. Condition B3 provides specific examples of events which could have or lead to an Adverse Effect. These examples are not exhaustive and VTCT will also report any other incident that could have an Adverse Effect. The initial notification report will follow a set format reporting: Who reported the incident and when (e.g. Name/Time-VTCT- 01/08/2016)? What is the event notification (e.g. Condition B3.2(f))? Where did the incident occur? What was the Adverse Effect? Any action VTCT has taken to mitigate A final report will be provided when the investigation is complete. All communication to the regulators must come from VTCT s Responsible Officer or Quality and Processing Manager who maintain a record of all communication in the case file. Notifications are to be emailed to: Regulatory.Implementation@Ofqual.gov.uk incidents@qualificationswales.org eventnotification@ccea.org.uk accreditation@sqa.org.uk Adverse Effect Policy_v6 January 2019 Page 5 of 7

Document amendment history page Version Document Owner Issue Date Changes Role v1 QAP manager 01/09/2016 Policy created Quality and Processing Manager v2 QAP manager 27/09/2016 Document review Quality and Processing Manager v3 QAP manager 13/04/2017 Updated with new branding Quality and Processing Supervisor v4 QAP manager 13/06/2017 Document history added Quality and Processing Supervisor v5 QAP manager 12/02/2018 Formatted and updated to new branding. Amended External Quality Assurance Manager to Quality and Processing Manager V6 QAP manager 18/01/2019 Corrected reference to Qualifications Wales from QiW to Qualifications Wales. Updated formatting and added document reference number. Product Designer (Qualifications) Compliance Manager Document Review Role Quality and Processing Manager Quality and Processing Supervisor Compliance Manager Review Status Reviewed Reviewed Reviewed Document Owner Document Owner QAP manager Document shared with Assessment manager Adverse Effect Policy_v6 January 2019 Page 6 of 7

Document Sign-off Role Executive Director of Awarding Sign-off Date 13/02/2018 Adverse Effect Policy_v6 January 2019 Page 7 of 7