Scary Stories from the Comptroller s Office Isreal J. Miller Gray Reed & McGraw LLP
Isreal J. Miller Gray Reed Counsel, Tax Section Education B.A., University of Texas at Austin M.S., Personal Financial Planning, Texas Tech University J.D., Texas Tech University School of Law LL.M., Taxation, Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law Experience Served for 5 years as an attorney in the Administrative Hearings Section of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
Gray Reed & McGraw Over 130 attorneys Full-service, commercial law firm Offices in Dallas & Houston Opened in 1985
I Just Got a Letter from the Texas Comptroller
And Now All of These People Are Soliciting My Clients.
Audit Elements
Audit Elements An auditor s primary function is to determine if a tax has been correctly reported and paid. This should be done in the shortest possible time, and should create the least possible inconvenience for a taxpayer.
Audit Elements Five essential elements are used to meet audit objectives: 1. Taxpayer Relations The benefit derived from developing a good relationship with a taxpayer is two-fold. The taxpayer tends to become more comfortable with the audit situation, which allows the audit process to flow more smoothly.
Audit Elements 2. Planning Activities Planning an audit begins when an audit assignment is received. It is very important that all audit activities, including pre-audit preparation, be documented in the Audit Plan.
Audit Elements Here is a tidbit from Comptroller s Decision No. 102,268 (2014): If only one fact is clear from the evidence, it is that the auditor was extremely frustrated by Petitioner s document production. She found Petitioner s documentation incomplete, unreliable, and insufficiently explained. The ALJ finds that the audit documentation demonstrates, prima facie, that the auditor s use of estimation methodologies was authorized. The audit plan is helpful in preparing a statement of grounds to contest audit results. It is available through an open records request emailed to: open.records@cpa.texas.gov and supported with a valid power of attorney.
Procedures to Obtain Information 1. Submit a request by mail, fax, email or in person according to a governmental body's reasonable procedures. 2. Include enough description and detail about the information requested to enable the governmental body to accurately identify and locate the information requested. 3. Cooperate with the governmental body's reasonable efforts to clarify the type or amount of information requested.
Information to be Released You may review it promptly, and if it cannot be produced within 10 working days the public information officer will notify you in writing of the reasonable date and time when it will be available.
Cost of Records You must respond to any written estimate of charges within 10 days of the date the governmental body sent it or the request is considered automatically withdrawn. If estimated costs exceed $100.00 the governmental body may require a bond, prepayment or deposit. Make a timely payment for all mutually agreed charges. A governmental body can demand payment of overdue balances exceeding $100.00, or obtain a security deposit, before processing additional requests from you.
Audit Elements 3. Examination of Records Gather and evaluate sufficient records to provide an adequate basis for determining the accuracy of the tax returns filed.
Comptroller s Decision 105,774 (2013)
Application of the Law An auditor must be familiar with the requirements of the law administered. Copies of all tax laws are available in every audit office. Rules issued by the Comptroller and registered with the Secretary of State have the effect of law and serve as guides for interpreting laws. Comptroller employees may view the rules on the Comptroller's internal Web site. The general public may view the rules via the Comptroller's website. Another reference source is memoranda issued by the Comptroller s office.
Audit Elements 4. Documentation Use documentation to note pertinent audit evidence discovered during an audit. A welldocumented audit will consist of a complete record of evidence examined by the auditor to support any findings. Also, document any oral statements made by the taxpayer which may be important to support any audit findings.
Audit Assignment The first step in the audit process occurs when the auditor receives the audit assignment. Pre-Audit Research and Review This research period is when the auditor reviews information about the account and the business to be audited.
Taxpayer Contact The first contact with the taxpayer occurs after initial preaudit research and review has been completed. The auditor calls the taxpayer to set an appointment to begin the audit. Entrance Conference The first face-to-face meeting with the taxpayer occurs during the entrance conference. During this meeting, the auditor will obtain more information regarding the taxpayer s business, answer taxpayer questions, discuss records required, and ask any other questions which will help in completing the audit.
Examination of Taxpayer Records It is important to determine how the taxpayer calculated the reported amounts. The auditor should have the taxpayer show how the return was prepared. Reconcile appropriate accounts with the taxpayer history after establishing the validity of summary records. Exit Conference Upon completion of the field work, the auditor will meet with the taxpayer and explain the results of the audit and administrative remedies.
Reconciliation Conference A reconciliation conference is available to a taxpayer who disagrees with the audit findings. The purpose of this conference is to re-evaluate the audit findings and resolve any taxpayer disagreements, if possible. The conference usually includes the taxpayer, the auditor, the group supervisor and/or audit manager.
Independent Audit Review Conference This conference may be held in addition to or instead of the reconciliation conference. An independent audit review conference is an informal meeting of the Independent Audit Reviewer (IAR), the taxpayer, the auditor, and the group supervisor and/or audit manager. The IAR is an impartial Comptroller employee with tax and audit expertise who will listen to both sides and try to resolve any is agreements before the audit enters the hearings process. The IAR reports directly to the assistant director of Tax Administration and does not work at any Comptroller office that conducts audits.
Audit Finalization (Audit Write-up) This is the process of summarizing the results of the examination. Audit Review When audit write-up is completed, it will be reviewed in the audit office and at the Regional Processing Center. The purpose of the review is to ensure that the audit is technically, procedurally, and mathematically correct.
Redetermination A taxpayer who disagrees with the results of an audit has several options. A Refund Hearing Request, if the audit has been paid in full District Court, if the audit has been paid in full Redetermination Hearing, if the audit has not been paid in full
Rule 1.7 Rule 1.7 requires: (a) The Statement of Grounds must contain the reasons the taxpayer disagrees with the action of the agency. The taxpayer must list and number the items or transactions, individually or by category, with which he disagrees. For each contested item or category of items, the taxpayer must also state the factual basis and the legal grounds to support why the taxpayer argues that the tax should not be assessed or the tax should be refunded. If the taxpayer disagrees with the agency s interpretation of the law, specific legal authority must be cited in support of the taxpayer s arguments.
Rule 1.7 (b) If an item or transaction, or category thereof, is not listed in the Statement of Grounds, it may be barred from consideration in a hearing. (c) In the event that the taxpayer s Statement of Grounds fails to list and number items or transactions, individually or by category, or fails to state the factual basis and legal grounds upon which relief is sought, the case may be dismissed. (d) If a taxpayer s Statement of Grounds raises issues that cannot be resolved from the material contained in the audit or Statement of Grounds, additional evidence may be obtained through: (1) a preliminary conference; (2) discovery as described in 1.33 of this title (relating to Discovery); (3) written or oral requests for additional evidence; and (4) an audit amendment.
Rule 1.7 (e) The Statement of Grounds may be amended up to the time that a reply to the Position Letter is required. All evidence on which the proving party intends to rely must be filed with the proposed amendment. (f) This section does not apply to hearings pursuant to Tax Code, 154.1142 or 155.0592.
Amended Audits Any changes to an audit after it has been completed on the computer system will result in an amended audit.
Comptroller s Decision No. 107,496 (2013)
Comptroller s Decision No. 109,162 (2014)
Comptroller s Decision No. 110,666 (2017)
Comptroller s Decision No. 111,757 (2015)
Comptroller s Decision No. 107,342 (2015)
Comptroller s Decision No. 111,071 (2015)
Comptroller s Decision No. 112,817 (2016)
Comptroller s Decision No. 112,817 (2016) 34 Tex. Admin. Code 3.357(a)(8) 34 Tex. Admin. Code 3.357(a)(11) Op. Tex. Att y Gen. No. MW-94 (1979)
Final Thoughts What if? If an offer is reasonable If the auditor does not have authority to settle If the case gets to Administrative Hearings If you refuse to settle and you and your client go to SOAH and lose If you lose If you just want to pay If you want to fight
Questions?
Thank you! Isreal Miller imiller@grayreed.com Gray Reed & McGraw www.grayreed.com
States With Economic Nexus Model (Implementation Date), Threshold Alabama (Oct. 1, 2018), $250,000 in in-state sales Connecticut (Dec. 1, 2018), 200 transactions and $250,000 in in-state sales Georgia (Jan. 1, 2019), 200 transactions and $250,000 in in-state sales Hawaii (July 1, 2018) 200 transactions or $100,000 in instate sales Illinois (Oct. 1, 2018) 200 transactions or $100,000 in instate sales Indiana (Oct. 1, 2018) 200 transactions or $100,000 in instate sales
States With Economic Nexus Model (Implementation Date), Threshold Iowa (Jan. 1, 2019) 200 transactions or $100,000 in instate sales Kentucky (Oct. 1, 2018) 200 transactions or $100,000 in instate sales Louisiana (Jan. 1, 2019) 200 transactions or $100,000 in instate sales Maine (implementation date not yet announced) 200 transactions or $100,000 in in-state sales Massachusetts (Oct. 1, 2017) 100 transactions and $500,000 in in-state sales Michigan (Oct. 1, 2018) 200 transactions or $100,000 in instate sales Minnesota (Oct. 1, 2018) 100 transactions or $100,000 in in-state sales in at least 10 transactions
States With Economic Nexus Model (Implementation Date), Threshold Mississippi (Dec. 1, 2017) $250,000 in in-state sales North Dakota (Oct. 1, 2018, or 60 days after a remote retailer meets the state s threshold whichever is later) 200 transactions or $100,000 in in-state sales Ohio (June 30, 2017) $500,000 in in-state sales Oklahoma (July 1, 2018) $10,000 in in-state sales Pennsylvania (April 1, 2018) $10,000 in in-state sales Rhode Island (Aug. 17, 2017) 200 transactions or $100,000 in in-state sales South Carolina (Nov. 1, 2018) $100,000 in in-state sales South Dakota (Nov. 1, 2018) 200 transactions or $100,000 in in-state sales
States With Economic Nexus Model (Implementation Date), Threshold Tennessee (currently on hold due to litigation) $500,000 in in-state sales Utah (Jan. 1, 2019) 200 transactions or $100,000 in instate sales Vermont (July 1, 2018) 200 transactions or $100,000 in instate sales Washington (Oct. 1, 2018) 200 transactions or $100,000 in in-state sales Wyoming (Oct. 1, 2018) 200 transactions or $100,000 in in-state sales
Comptroller Mulls Wayfair Implementation By John Kennedy Texas Taxpayers and Research Association (TTARA) (Aug. 21, 2018) - Yesterday the Texas Comptroller s Office held a combined meeting of his Business Advisory Group (BAG) and his Tax Advisory Group (TAG) to discuss the agency s plans in response to the U.S. Supreme Court s decision in Wayfair v. South Dakota, which overruled its 50-year-old precedent holding that a seller must have a physical presence in a state before being required to collect use tax on sales made to in-state buyers. TTARA is a member of BAG, and attended the meeting. In response to the decision, the Comptroller is considering amending the definition of engaged in business in Rule 3.286(a)(4) to track the language in Tax Code 151.107(a) and (b). In addition, the current Rule 3.286(b)(2) regarding outof-state sellers would be deleted and replaced with a safe harbor provision for remote sellers by setting an in-state sales volume threshold below which there would be no use tax collection responsibility. The new rule would not be retroactive. The Comptroller has yet to make a final decision on what safe harbor threshold to propose. Under consideration is whether to set only a specific dollar amount of Texas sales threshold or to also include an either-or number of sales qualifier, such as the $100,000 in sales or 200 transactions used by South Dakota. For local sales tax remittance purposes, the Comptroller is considering the use in some fashion of the fee in lieu of local tax provided in Tax Code 151.059, which provides for imposing local tax at a weighted average rate with distribution of the receipts to local jurisdictions based on their percentage share of total local sales tax collections. This could not be done in rule; however, and authorizing legislation would be needed. Another issue requiring legislation relates to marketplace providers businesses that facilitate sales on behalf of others. Legislation would be required to mandate marketplace providers to collect tax on the sales they facilitate. However, to simplify compliance there would be no safe harbor for marketplace platform sellers. The marketplace provider would be required to collect tax on all sales. Republished from the TTARA newsletter of Aug. 21, 2018 with the gracious permission of the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association (TTARA).
Comptroller Mulls Wayfair Implementation By John Kennedy Texas Taxpayers and Research Association (TTARA) The current planned schedule for adopting and implementing the amended rule is: Early September distribution of a draft rule for comment to the members of the Comptroller s Business Advisory Group (BAG) and Taxpayer Advisory Group (TAG); End of October submission of a final proposed rule for publication in the Texas Register to begin the required 30-day public comment period; January 1, 2019 rule becomes effective; and Either July 1 or October 1, 2019 enforcement of the rule will begin.