Markets with Intermediaries

Similar documents
Markets with Intermediaries

Chapter 11: Network Models of Markets with Intermediaries. Presented by Vladislava Arabadzhieva

Auctions. Episode 8. Baochun Li Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto

Matching Markets and Google s Sponsored Search

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4

Lecture 6 Dynamic games with imperfect information

Simon Fraser University Spring 2014

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4

Noncooperative Market Games in Normal Form

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 2015

Game Theory: Additional Exercises

Economics 502 April 3, 2008

AS/ECON 2350 S2 N Answers to Mid term Exam July time : 1 hour. Do all 4 questions. All count equally.

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

Corporate Control. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Today. Applications of NE and SPNE Auctions English Auction Second-Price Sealed-Bid Auction First-Price Sealed-Bid Auction

MKTG 555: Marketing Models

d. Find a competitive equilibrium for this economy. Is the allocation Pareto efficient? Are there any other competitive equilibrium allocations?

Microeconomics I. Undergraduate Programs in Business Administration and Economics

HW Consider the following game:

II-5. Intermediaries. Outline. Introduction. SponSearch. Introduction. II-5. Intermediaries. Introduction. SponSearch. II-5.

M.Phil. Game theory: Problem set II. These problems are designed for discussions in the classes of Week 8 of Michaelmas term. 1

In Class Exercises. Problem 1

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: August 7, 2017

Extensive-Form Games with Imperfect Information

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9

Notes for Section: Week 4

Strategy -1- Strategy

Introduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4)

Université du Maine Théorie des Jeux Yves Zenou Correction de l examen du 16 décembre 2013 (1 heure 30)

Problem 3 Solutions. l 3 r, 1

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Econ 601 Prof. James Peck Extra Practice Problems Answers (for final)

Sequential-move games with Nature s moves.

Economics 171: Final Exam

Duopoly models Multistage games with observed actions Subgame perfect equilibrium Extensive form of a game Two-stage prisoner s dilemma

University at Albany, State University of New York Department of Economics Ph.D. Preliminary Examination in Microeconomics, June 20, 2017

1 Solutions to Homework 3

Game Theory Notes: Examples of Games with Dominant Strategy Equilibrium or Nash Equilibrium

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

Not 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L.

Networks: Fall 2010 Homework 3 David Easley and Jon Kleinberg Due in Class September 29, 2010

13.1 Infinitely Repeated Cournot Oligopoly

Game Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Repeated Games

Game Theory. Important Instructions

Econ 323 Microeconomic Theory. Practice Exam 2 with Solutions

Problem Set 3: Suggested Solutions

Exercises Solutions: Game Theory

EC 202. Lecture notes 14 Oligopoly I. George Symeonidis

Strategy -1- Strategic equilibrium in auctions

Agenda. Game Theory Matrix Form of a Game Dominant Strategy and Dominated Strategy Nash Equilibrium Game Trees Subgame Perfection

Social Network Analysis

Econ 323 Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 10, Question 1

Now we return to simultaneous-move games. We resolve the issue of non-existence of Nash equilibrium. in pure strategies through intentional mixing.

Chapter 11: Dynamic Games and First and Second Movers

Eco AS , J. Sandford, spring 2019 March 9, Midterm answers

Repeated Games. September 3, Definitions: Discounting, Individual Rationality. Finitely Repeated Games. Infinitely Repeated Games

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

In reality; some cases of prisoner s dilemma end in cooperation. Game Theory Dr. F. Fatemi Page 219

Bayesian Nash Equilibrium

Econ 711 Homework 1 Solutions

Game Theory Lecture #16

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Second Midterm Examination Answers

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016

CMSC 474, Introduction to Game Theory 16. Behavioral vs. Mixed Strategies

Games of Incomplete Information ( 資訊不全賽局 ) Games of Incomplete Information

Dynamic Games. Econ 400. University of Notre Dame. Econ 400 (ND) Dynamic Games 1 / 18

October 9. The problem of ties (i.e., = ) will not matter here because it will occur with probability

Subjects: What is an auction? Auction formats. True values & known values. Relationships between auction formats

FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.

Topics in Informational Economics 2 Games with Private Information and Selling Mechanisms

Prisoner s dilemma with T = 1

ECO 463. SequentialGames

SI 563 Homework 3 Oct 5, Determine the set of rationalizable strategies for each of the following games. a) X Y X Y Z

Topics in Contract Theory Lecture 1

Insurance, Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard

Econ 101A Final exam Th 15 December. Do not turn the page until instructed to.

ECON Microeconomics II IRYNA DUDNYK. Auctions.

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 12

Game Theory: Global Games. Christoph Schottmüller

Economics 109 Practice Problems 1, Vincent Crawford, Spring 2002

Appendix: Common Currencies vs. Monetary Independence

ECONS 424 STRATEGY AND GAME THEORY HANDOUT ON PERFECT BAYESIAN EQUILIBRIUM- III Semi-Separating equilibrium

Advanced Microeconomics

EC202. Microeconomic Principles II. Summer 2009 examination. 2008/2009 syllabus

EXTRA PROBLEMS. and. a b c d

Name: Midterm #1 EconS 425 (February 20 th, 2015)

The Nash equilibrium of the stage game is (D, R), giving payoffs (0, 0). Consider the trigger strategies:

9.2 Adverse Selection under Certainty: Lemons I and II. The principal contracts to buy from the agent a car whose quality

Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna

Microeconomics Comprehensive Exam

Auctions: Types and Equilibriums

(a) (5 points) Suppose p = 1. Calculate all the Nash Equilibria of the game. Do/es the equilibrium/a that you have found maximize social utility?

Repeated Games. Econ 400. University of Notre Dame. Econ 400 (ND) Repeated Games 1 / 48

Notes on Auctions. Theorem 1 In a second price sealed bid auction bidding your valuation is always a weakly dominant strategy.

Optimal selling rules for repeated transactions.

IPR Protection in the High-Tech Industries: A Model of Piracy. Thierry Rayna University of Bristol

March 30, Why do economists (and increasingly, engineers and computer scientists) study auctions?

Introduction to Game Theory

Final Examination December 14, Economics 5010 AF3.0 : Applied Microeconomics. time=2.5 hours

BASICS OF COMPETITIVE MARKETS FOR ELECTRICITY AUCTIONS - INTENT AUCTIONS - COMPONENTS. Basic Definitions Transactions Futures

Transcription:

Markets with Intermediaries Episode Baochun Li Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto

Network Models of Markets with Intermediaries (Chapter )

Who sets the prices? 3

Who sets the prices? Matching markets embody a number of basic principles People naturally have different preferences for different kinds of goods Prices can decentralize the allocation of goods to people Such prices can in fact lead to allocations that are socially optimal 3

Who sets the prices? Matching markets embody a number of basic principles People naturally have different preferences for different kinds of goods Prices can decentralize the allocation of goods to people Such prices can in fact lead to allocations that are socially optimal But who sets the prices, who trades with whom, if there are many buyers and many sellers? 3

Trade with intermediaries In a wide range of markets, buyers and sellers do not interact directly with each other, but instead trade through intermediaries Think real estate brokers, stock markets There are many kinds of markets, each serving a purpose A particular good can be traded in multiple markets How do buyers and sellers interact in a stock market? 4

$5.5 $5.5 ASK $5. ASK $4. BID $4. BID $3.5 $3.5 (a) (b) The order book

A network structure with multiple traders With multiple buyers, sellers, and traders (intermediaries) connected in a network structure, what is the trading behaviour at equilibrium? B T S S B T S B 6

Assumptions in our simple network model Do not consider multiple goods for sale, or multiple quantities Each seller i holds one unit of the good, willing to sell it at any price that s at least vi Each buyer j values one unit of the good at vj, willing to pay no more than this value all buyers have the same valuation No one wants more than one unit All buyers, sellers and traders are assumed to know all the valuations Network structure is fied not affected by valuations 7

vi sellers traders buyers vj S B T S2 B2 T2 S3 B3

Model it as a game 9

Model it as a game Two stages The traders simultaneously announce their ask and bid prices to the sellers and buyers connected Each seller and buyer chooses at most one trader (but doesn t have to) all sellers and buyers simultaneously make the choice Let s model it as a dynamic game Maimizing the payoffs: a buyer j maimizes vj - atj; a trader maimizes its profit; a seller i maimizes bti - vi 9

sellers traders buyers S.2.8 B T.2.8 S2.3.7 B2 T2 S3 First stage B3

sellers traders buyers S.2.8 B T.2.8 S2.3.7 B2 T2 S3 Second stage B3

When a seller or buyer is indifferent between accepting or rejecting, then we (as the modellers) have a choice.

Best responses and equilibrium T is making several bad decisions He is losing the opportunity of dealing with S2 and B2 to T2 If he were to raise his bid to seller S2 to.4, and lower his ask to.6 sellers traders buyers S B T.4.6 S2.3.7 B2 T2 S3 B3 3

What are bid and ask prices at equilibrium? 4

What are bid and ask prices at equilibrium? First think about the sellers and buyers they choose optimally given whatever prices that traders have posted and the traders know this 4

What are bid and ask prices at equilibrium? First think about the sellers and buyers they choose optimally given whatever prices that traders have posted and the traders know this Then think about the problem faced by the traders, in deciding what prices to post in the first stage Each trader chooses a strategy that is a best response to both the strategies the sellers and buyers will use and the strategies the other traders will use 4

What are bid and ask prices at equilibrium? First think about the sellers and buyers they choose optimally given whatever prices that traders have posted and the traders know this Then think about the problem faced by the traders, in deciding what prices to post in the first stage Each trader chooses a strategy that is a best response to both the strategies the sellers and buyers will use and the strategies the other traders will use At equilibrium (called a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium), what are the bid and ask prices? Let s start with something simple 4

Monopoly sellers traders buyers S T B For any other bid and ask, the trader can slightly lower the bid or raise the ask to get a higher profit 5

Perfect competition sellers traders buyers T S B T2 T at equilibrium has a common bid and ask of If T performs the trade, T2 must have a bid and ask of since b <= and a >= But if a > b, then T could lower the bid or raise the ask and make a positive profit 6

Back to our eample sellers traders buyers S B T S2 B2 T2 S3 B3 7

Implicit perfect competition S T B T2 T3 B2 T4 S2 8

Modelling single-item second-price auctions T B w T2 B2 S T3 B3 y w > > y > z T4 B4 z 9

Modelling single-item second-price auctions T w B w T2 B2 S z y T3 y B3 y T4 z B4 z The second-price rule is not built into the formulation of the auction; it emerges naturally as an equilibrium. 2

Social welfare in trading networks Are the solutions at equilibrium socially optimal? maimizing the sum of payoffs of all the players Each good that moves from seller i to buyer j contribute vj - vi to the social welfare (bti - vi) + (atj - bti) + (vj - atj) = vj - vi As a result, more richly connected networks can potentially allow a flow of goods achieving a higher social welfare 2

Equilibria and social welfare: eample <= <= 2 <= y <= 2 <= z <= 3 S B S B T z T y S2 B2 2 S2 z y B2 2 T2 3 B3 3 T2 3 B3 3 S3 4 S3 4 social welfare (a) B4 4 social welfare +2+4 = 7 2+3+4 = 9 (b) B4 4 22

In every trader network, there is always at least one equilibrium, and every equilibrium produces a flow of goods that is socially optimal.

Chapter..5