A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement May 14, 2014

Similar documents
A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement June 30, 2015

Summary of Compliance. A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement

A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement May 19, 2016

Case 1:12-cv RMC Document 193 Filed 12/16/14 Page 1 of 79 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement October 22, 2015

The National Mortgage Settlement Monitor s Final Crediting Report March 18, 2014

Case 1:12-cv RMC Document 159 Filed 05/14/14 Page 1 of 56 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UPDATED CONSUMER RELIEF

CONSUMER RELIEF THROUGH MARCH 31, 2016

TOPIC CFPB HBOR NMS. January 10, January 1, April 4, Servicers and sub-servicers; not trustees acting under a DOT (a).

CONSUMER RELIEF THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2015

Servicing Standards Quarterly Compliance Metrics Executive Summary

INITIAL REPORT JOSEPH A. SMITH, JR., MONITOR. Introduction. The Chase RMBS Settlement. CHASE RMBS SETTLEMENT July 22, 2014

The National Mortgage Settlement: Loan Modifications and Servicing Standards

Government and Private Initiatives to Address the Foreclosure Crisis

National Mortgage Settlement & California Commitment

The CFPB. What Lenders And Servicers Must Know. Joseph M. Welch, Esq.

The National Mortgage Settlement: July 31, :00 4:00pm

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

CFPB National Servicing Standards, Are Servicers Ready?

Appendix C Remedial Action Plan

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY CONSENT ORDER

Understanding the National Mortgage Settlement A Guide for Housing Counselors

Annual Report NOVEMBER 2015

Mortgage Servicers Have Wrongfully Terminated Homeowners Out of the HAMP Program

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY CONSENT ORDER

Servicer Compliance with CFPB Servicing Regulations

New CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules (Part 2): Loss Mitigation Procedures. John Rao Lisa Sitkin Josh Zinner

Effective Foreclosure Timeline Management Reference Guide

The National Mortgage Settlement: July 31, :00 4:00pm

Making Home Affordable Program Performance Report Third Quarter 2015

Chase Independent Review. Initial Report by the Independent Reviewer. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bankruptcy Settlement

New Servicing Rules under RESPA Early Intervention, Continuous Contact and Loss Mitigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CONSUMER RELIEF UPDATE

Home Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine

Home Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 22, 2016

Case 1:12-cv RMC Document 14 Filed 04/04/12 Page 1 of 92

Case 1:12-cv RMC Document 11 Filed 04/04/12 Page 1 of 86

REFORMS Overview of Reforms to Mortgage and Foreclosure Processing Standards in the Settlement

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

REAL ESTATE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES ACT ( RESPA ) POLICY

2016 Foreclosure Law Amendments and Vacant and Abandoned Property Legislation. Two Major Prongs to Legislation

CFPB Supervision and Examination Process

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

mg Doc 143 Filed 05/23/12 Entered 05/23/12 15:25:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 6 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11

The issuing entity is offering the following classes of notes: Class A-1 Notes. Class A-2 Notes. Class A-3 Notes

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Servicemember Financial Protection

703: SERVICE MEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT POLICY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

CFPB s PROPOSED RULE ON SERVICING STANDARDS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

2015 STAR Best Practices

Examination Procedures

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 25, 2018

Point of view. Analyzing Strategic Regulatory Policy Shifts. Americas FS Regulatory Center of Excellence

TITLE 230 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION

FINAL RULE ANALYSIS 2016 MORTGAGE SERVICING RULE AMENDMENTS (REG X) 2016 TRUTH IN LENDING AMENDMENTS (REG Z)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

CASE 0:17-cv PAM-DTS Document 243 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Senate Bill No. 818 CHAPTER 404

National Mortgage Settlement

STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD CFPB

United States of America Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Lending to Military Members: The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Lending Act Final Rule

Information on Avoiding Foreclosure

TO: Freddie Mac Servicers August 15, 2013

Case 1:14-cv RMC Document 67 Filed 08/11/15 Page 1 of 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SOLDIERS AND SAILORS RELIEF ACT. by Steven C. Lindberg Freedman Anselmo Lindberg & Rappe LLC September, 2001

What the Settlement. What the Settlement Does. Does. National Settlement. National Foreclosure Settlement: Data needs, Gaps, and New Opportunities

FORT SILL LEGAL ASSISTANCE

October 22, Joseph A. Smith Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 301 Fayetteville St., Suite 1801 Raleigh, NC Via electronic mail

TO: Freddie Mac Sellers and Servicers October 3, 2012

Enforcement Acons Mortgage Banking

United States Senate, Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs

Delinquency Management for Mortgages Secured by Primary Residences

National Association of Federal Credit Unions Fair Lending Training (Part II)

Supervisory Highlights Consumer Reporting Special Edition

Appeal from the Order Entered April 1, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County Civil Division at No(s): C-48-CV

SUBJECT: SERVICING UPDATES

Default Management Servicing Guide

Instructions for Completing the Short Sale Package. Send Ocwen the completed package and supporting documentation

SPECIAL RULES FOR FORECLOSURES ON HOMES. Joseph M. Licare, Esq. Bryan Cave LLP New York, New York

October 10, Paul Watkins, Director, Office of Innovation Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20552

Definitions Assessment of fees; processing of payments; publication of statements.

NACTT. The Honorable Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C

HOPE NOW: Proprietary Loan Modifications for Homeowners Continue at a Steady Pace 120K Completed in September

CFO update for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C.

PLM Loan Management Services, Inc. 46 N. Second Street, Campbell, CA TEL (408) FAX (408)

THE ENFORCEMENT POWERS OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU JONATHAN FOXX President and Managing Director Lenders Compliance Group, Inc.

LA16-06 STATE OF NEVADA. Performance Audit. Office of the Attorney General. Legislative Auditor Carson City, Nevada

ADDENDUM TO THE BROKER AGREEMENT BETWEEN COMMON GROUND HEALTHCARE COOPERATIVE AND BROKER

Consumer Response Annual Report

Transcription:

Compliance in Progress A Report from the Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement May 14, 2014

The following summary is an overview of my third set of compliance reports, which I have filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia as Monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement. It includes: An overview of the process through which my colleagues and I have reviewed the servicers performance on the Settlement s servicing reforms An update on the servicers corrective action plans from metric fails reported previously Summaries of each servicer s compliance for the third and fourth calendar quarters of 2013 An analysis of complaints received from distressed borrowers and the professionals who represent them This report includes information on the Settlement s original 29 metrics that were used to test the servicers implementation of the servicing standards during the fifth and sixth testing periods, or the third and fourth quarters of 2013. The servicers covered by this report for both the third and fourth calendar quarters of 2013 are Bank of America, Citi, Chase, Ocwen and Wells Fargo. Ocwen was tested only on the loans that it acquired from the ResCap Parties. These servicers did not fail any metrics during the most recent testing periods. Because my colleagues and I now have testing results for all 29 metrics over four testing periods, or one calendar year, this summary report focuses on reviewing the servicers compliance activities over time. Results over time include a presentation of which metrics servicers failed, how they fixed the problems and whether their performances improved once testing resumed. This report also contains fourth-quarter compliance testing results for the loans Green Tree acquired from the ResCap Parties. Green Tree implemented the Settlement s servicing standards after such acquisition. Green Tree failed a total of eight metrics during this time period. These results show that Green Tree has much implementation work to do. Results for the other five servicers demonstrate that servicing problems are being addressed quickly and effectively. Yet work still remains to ensure that the servicers treat their customers fairly. My team continues to test the servicers performance in following the rules set forth by the Settlement. Additionally, testing has just begun on the four new metrics I issued in October, and I believe they will help in further holding the servicers accountable. I look forward to reporting on those results in my next compliance report later this year. Sincerely, Joseph A. Smith, Jr. Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 2

Introduction Introduction Oversight Process As required by the National Mortgage Settlement (Settlement or NMS), I have filed compliance reports with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (the Bank of America Court) for each servicer that is a party to the Settlement. The servicers include four of the Chase original parties Bank of America, Chase, Citi and Wells Fargo. Essentially all of the servicing Citi assets of the fifth original servicer party, ResCap, were sold to and divided between Ocwen Green Tree and Green Tree pursuant to a February 5, 2013, bankruptcy court order. Accordingly, Ocwen Ocwen and Green Tree are now subject to the NMS for the portions of their portfolios they acquired from ResCap.1 These reports provide the results of my testing regarding compliance with Wells Fargo the NMS servicing standards during the third and fourth calendar quarters of 2013, or test Consumer Complaints periods five and six. They are the third set of reports for the original four bank servicers, the second report for Ocwen and the first report assessing Green Tree. Copies of all the reports Additional Metrics filed with the court are available on my website, mortgageoversight.com. 1 Conclusion he Court separately entered a consent judgment between Ocwen and government parties on February 26, 2014, as part of the NMS, T thereby subjecting Ocwen s entire portfolio to the Settlement s requirements. Accordingly, in future quarters, I will test and report on Ocwen s performance as it relates to its entire portfolio, not just the part of its portfolio it acquired from the ResCap Parties. Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 3

Oversight Process As Monitor, I have continued to oversee the servicers compliance with the servicing standards by working closely with a team of professional firms. BDO Consulting, a division of BDO USA, LLP (BDO), serves as my primary professional firm (PPF). My team also consists of five secondary professional firms (SPFs), each one assigned to a servicer. These firms continue to assist me in providing rigorous oversight of the servicers. The work conducted to test the six servicers during test periods five and six involved 269 professionals, which includes my PPF, SPFs and other professionals who dedicated approximately 69,910 hours over a seven-month period. As shown in the following description, the oversight process is extensive. To assess how well the servicers adhere to the 304 servicing standards, or rules, outlined in the NMS, the servicers were evaluated using a series of 29 metrics, or tests, enumerated in the Settlement. I negotiated a separate work plan with each of the servicers that specifies how these tests are carried out and validated. The Monitoring Committee, comprising of representatives from 15 states, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the United States Department of Justice, reviewed these work plans and, after providing input, did not object to their adoption. Each servicer has assigned a group of employees or contractors who are independent from the servicer s mortgage servicing operations to determine whether the servicer s activities are compliant. This group, called the Internal Review Group (IRG), uses the servicer s systems of record to compile the full population of loans related to each metric and tests a statistically valid sample of such loans to determine whether the servicer has passed the metric. The SPF I have assigned to the servicer then reviews the IRG s work papers and tests a sub-sample of the IRG s sample in a process under the NMS. Introduction Oversight Process Bank of America Chase Citi Green Tree Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints Additional Metrics Conclusion Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 4

If the servicer fails a metric, the NMS deems this a potential violation that the servicer can cure. The servicer must create and implement a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to address the root causes of the fail, which I review and, once satisfied, approve. After I have determined that the servicer has completed the CAP, testing recommences during the cure period, which is generally the next quarter, unless the CAP is completed in the first month of a quarter and I direct the servicer to resume testing in the current quarter. If the servicer fails the same metric again within either of the first two quarters after completion of the CAP, the Monitoring Committee and I may take enforcement action through the Court. This may include injunctive relief and civil penalties up to $1 million or, in certain circumstances, $5 million. In addition to correcting the potential violation, the servicer must remediate borrowers identified during testing who were materially harmed. If I determine that the potential violation is widespread, the servicer must identify all borrowers who were harmed by the noncompliance and remediate such harm. The SPF, PPF and I then review and test the implementation of these remediation efforts until the servicer asserts, and I confirm, that its remediation is complete. Throughout the two test periods covered in this report (July 1-September 30, 2013, and October 1-December 31, 2013), my professionals and I tested each of the six servicers on up to 29 metrics. See metric testing timeline for details on the metrics we used to test each servicer. Introduction Oversight Process Bank of America Chase Citi Green Tree Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints Additional Metrics Conclusion Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 5

Bank of America Results As I stated in my previous compliance reports, Bank of America N.A. (Bank of America) reported to the Monitoring Committee and me that it failed Metrics 6, 19 and 5. Bank of America implemented Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) to remedy the root causes of these fails. In test periods five and six, neither the IRG nor my professionals found evidence of a potential violation for any Metric tested. As further discussed in my compliance reports, Bank of America will resume testing for Metric 5 in test period eight (second calendar quarter of 2014). Introduction Oversight Process Bank of America Chase Citi Green Tree Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints Additional Metrics Conclusion Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 6

Chase Results As I stated in my previous compliance reports, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (Chase) reported to the Monitoring Committee and me that it failed Metrics 29, 20 and 6. Chase implemented Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) to remedy the root causes of these fails. In test periods five and six, neither the IRG nor my professionals found evidence of a potential violation of any Metric tested. Introduction Oversight Process Bank of America Chase Citi Green Tree Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints Additional Metrics Conclusion Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 7

Citi Results As I stated in my previous compliance reports, CitiMortgage, Inc. (Citi) reported to the Monitoring Committee and me that it failed Metrics 19, 6 and 23. Citi implemented Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) to remedy the root causes of these fails. In test periods five and six, neither the IRG nor my professionals found evidence of a potential violation for any Metric tested. Introduction Oversight Process Bank of America Chase Citi Green Tree Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints Additional Metrics Conclusion Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 8

Green Tree Results The ResCap Parties (formerly Ally/GMAC) were subject to a February 5, 2013, bankruptcy court order that divided and transferred their servicing rights and assets. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, (Green Tree) acquired approximately 18.5 percent of the servicing rights. Introduction Oversight Process Bank of America Chase I negotiated an implementation schedule for Metric 4 tests whether the servicer Metric 10 tests whether the servicer waived Citi Green Tree s compliance with the servicing standards, and testing began for all 29 Metrics accurately stated amounts due from borrowers in proofs of claims filed post-petition fees, charges or expenses when required by the Settlement Green Tree on Green Tree s portion of the ResCap portfolio in test period six (fourth calendar quarter of 2013). Green Tree reported that it failed the following eight metrics in test period six: in bankruptcy proceedings Metric 5 tests whether the servicer accurately stated amounts due from borrowers in affidavits filed in support for relief from stay in bankruptcy proceedings Metric 6 tests whether loans were delinquent at the time foreclosure was Metric 12 tests whether the servicer has documented policies and procedures in place to oversee third party vendors Metric 18 tests whether the servicer responded to government submitted complaints and inquiries from borrowers within 10 business days and provided an Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints initiated and whether the servicer provided borrower with accurate information in a pre-foreclosure letter Metric 7 tests whether the servicer provided update within 30 days Metric 19 tests whether the servicer notified the borrower of any missing documents in a loan modification application within five Additional Metrics Conclusion borrower with required notifications no later days of receipt than 14 days prior to referral to foreclosure and whether required notification statements were accurate I am currently reviewing CAPs that Green Tree has proposed to address the root causes of these fails. I plan to report on these plans and Green Tree s progress in my next report. Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 9

Ocwen Results The ResCap Parties (formerly Ally/GMAC) were subject to a February 5, 2013, bankruptcy court order that divided and transferred their servicing rights and assets. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, (Ocwen) acquired approximately 80 percent of the servicing rights. Introduction Oversight Process Bank of America Chase As I stated in my last report, Ocwen fully implemented all of the servicing standards associated with the 29 Metrics for its portion of the ResCap portfolio. In test periods five and six, neither the IRG nor my professionals found any evidence of a potential violation for any Metric tested. In February 2014, Ocwen entered into a new consent judgment with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and 49 states requiring Ocwen to comply with the NMS servicing standards for its entire loan portfolio. Ocwen has begun to implement NMS servicing standards, and I plan to report on Ocwen s compliance as it relates to its entire portfolio beginning in test period nine (third calendar quarter of 2014). Citi Green Tree Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints Additional Metrics Conclusion Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 10

Wells Fargo Results As I stated in my previous compliance reports, Wells Fargo reported to the Monitoring Committee and me that it failed Metric 19. Wells Fargo implemented a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to remedy the root causes of this fail. In test periods five and six, neither the IRG nor my professionals found evidence of a potential violation for any Metric tested. Introduction Oversight Process Bank of America Chase Citi Green Tree Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints Additional Metrics Conclusion Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 11

Consumer Complaints In addition to testing compliance with the servicing standards as previously described, my colleagues and I receive information on servicer conduct in the marketplace through a variety of channels. Introduction Oversight Process Bank of America Chase The NMS requires that each servicer submit to me Executive Office complaints, complaints that are filed with the servicers by the offices of government agencies or elected officials on behalf of their constituents. From July 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013, my professionals and I received and analyzed 55,081 Executive Office complaints from the servicers. In aggregate, my professionals and I have received and analyzed 160,233 Executive Office complaints since October 2012. My colleagues and I also receive complaints directly from state attorneys general offices and have access to complaints submitted to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). We compare these complaints to those I receive from the servicers to make sure my colleagues and I are apprised of all relevant complaints. Additionally, we review the complaints submitted to my office by professionals who work on borrowers behalf, which provide an independent source of information to supplement the other sources. Between July 1, 2013, and December 31, 2013, professionals had submitted 184 complaints. In total, my professionals and I have received and analyzed 1,334 complaints since May 2012. Citi Green Tree Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints Additional Metrics Conclusion Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 12

Additional Metrics As described in my last report, the servicers, Monitoring Committee and I agreed on four additional metrics in October 2013. These metrics were the results of information obtained from complaints data and from my meetings with attorneys general, counselors, other advocates and distressed borrowers around the country. Their input, along with my team s analysis of complaints, made it clear to me that additional testing measures were needed to address concerns related to the loan modification process, single points of contact and billing statement accuracy. Compliance testing by the IRGs on two of the new metrics began on January 1, 2014. These metrics test to ensure that servicers: Provide customers contact information for new single points of contact and implement procedures that evaluate and remediate single point of contact performance, and Use accurate, detailed information in monthly billing statements to customers. Compliance testing by the IRGs on two other metrics began on April 1, 2014. 2 These metrics relate to the loan modification process and will: Test the servicers on how well they communicate missing documents for loan modification applications, Ensure that loan modification applications are not prematurely denied and that foreclosure proceedings are delayed to allow appropriate time for distressed borrowers to provide additional documentation, and Confirm servicers properly communicate loan modification denials. I will report to the Court and the public on the compliance results of these four new tests in my next compliance reports. Court filings for these additional metrics can be downloaded here. Introduction Oversight Process Bank of America Chase Citi Green Tree Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints Additional Metrics Conclusion 2 With Ocwen having entered into a new consent judgment in February 2014, all parties have agreed to permit Ocwen s IRG to begin compliance testing on the two other metrics that relate to the loan modification process as of July 1, 2014. Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 13

Conclusion Introduction Oversight Process The majority of my findings suggest that the Settlement is working to hold the servicers accountable to the servicing reforms they agreed to in the NMS. My testing results also show that there is still more work to be done, especially in the case of Green Tree. My team and I will continue to test the servicers on their compliance with the Settlement s servicing reforms, and we will continue working with Green Tree to institute rigorous CAPs. Bank of America Chase Citi Green Tree My next compliance report will include testing results on the four additional metrics I created late last year. These metrics are designed to ensure that the servicers better treat their customers in areas that had not been adequately measured under the original metrics, including the loan modification process, single points of contact and billing statement accuracy. I look forward to sharing these results in the coming months. Ocwen Wells Fargo Consumer Complaints Additional Metrics Conclusion Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight 14