continued on page 14 BY OLIVER FELSENSTEIN AND CHRISTOPH KUEPPERS (LOVELLS) continued on page 2

Similar documents
Survey on the Implementation of the EC Interest and Royalty Directive

Headquarter Jurisdictions Around the World: A Comparison

MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENT

ECJ to Review Belgian Dividend Treatment

European Commission publishes Anti Tax Avoidance Package

BELGIUM GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

RSM InterTax Tax Insights February Belgian corporate income tax reform

The International Tax Landscape

International Tax Europe and Africa November 2016

ECJ to Examine Belgian Withholding Rules

International Tax Belgium Highlights 2018

Trends I Netherlands moves away from fiscal offshore industry

The new Belgian recipe for Real Estate funds

OUTLINE LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS... IV LIST OF LEGAL REFERENCES... V

Tax incentives on Research and Development (R&D) 16 September 2014

INVESTMENT AID IN EUROPE MARCH 2014 POLICY UPDATE

Latest CJEU, EFTA and ECHR

Lithuania Country Profile

COMPARISON OF EUROPEAN HOLDING COMPANY REGIMES

Middle East Newsletter

Cyprus Tax Guide for Investors

OECD releases final BEPS package

International Tax Europe and Africa October 2017

The Netherlands in International Tax Planning Second revised edition. Table of contents

TAXATION OF FOREIGN INVESTORS IN LITHUANIA

New Swiss corporate tax developments : A paradigm shift?

IMPLEMENTING THE REVISED PARENT SUBSIDIARY DIRECTIVE ACROSS THE EU

The OECD s 3 Major Tax Initiatives

To what extent does Cyprus still present advantages in international tax planning? The Switzerland EC savings tax agreement: a positive result?

How the FTT works in specific cases and other questions and answers

CONFEDERATION FISCALE EUROPEENNE

International Tax - Europe & Africa Newsletter

Tax Card 2018 Effective from 1 January 2018 The Republic of Estonia

BEPS Beyond Fortune 1000 October Armanino LLP amllp.com Armanino LLP amllp.com

Setting up your Business in Germany Issues to consider

The Advantages of the Cyprus Tax System

Setting up in Denmark

1. Which foreign entities need to be classified?

INTRODUCTION 2019 TAX PLAN

New Corporate Income Tax Regulation

IFA MUNICH. Strategic Approaches to Global Transfer Pricing Risk: the use of tax treaties through APA and MAP. 18 January 2018

Recent and expected tax changes in Bulgaria and Greece important for cross-border operations

GERMANY GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Hong Kong SAR Tax Profile

Tax newsletter. VMB Accountants & Tax Consultants 12 July 2012

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS...III LIST OF LEGAL REFERENCES... IV PART I. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DIRECTIVE... V 1. INTRODUCTION... V

The Liège Court of First Instance in Belgium has

BEPS Action 14: Making dispute resolution mechanisms more effective

Welcome to the EFS-seminar. BEPS and transfer pricing, but what about VAT and Customs? Conference Chairman: René van der Paardt

International Tax - Europe and Africa Newsletter

1. International Company Taxation

tax update april 2013

International Tax - Europe & Africa Newsletter

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS... IV LIST OF LEGAL REFERENCES... V PART I. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DIRECTIVE... VI 1. INTRODUCTION... VI

Latvia Country Profile

Tax Issues for Outbound Investors. Marie Bradley Bradley Tax Consulting

TAX STRUCTURING WITH BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES KIEV ARBITRATION DAYS: THINK BIG CONFERENCE KIEV, UKRAINE NOVEMBER 15, 2013

Sustainability of upper tier structures impact of BEPS

EU Direct Tax Group activities European Commission welcomes EFRP/EUDTG reports on discriminatory treatment pension funds

Simplifying BEPS Action Plan

Is it time for your country to consider the "patent box"?

Proposal for amending the Parent-Subsidiary Directive: European Commission is waging war against double non-taxation

Romania Country Profile

EC Law Aspects of Hybrid Entities

International Tax Italy Highlights 2018

Dutch Treaty Developments With Gulf Cooperation Council Countries

The OECD report on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) and EU measures against aggressive tax planning and tax fraud

The Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base. Christoph Spengel

Tax Management International Forum

Ireland Country Profile

The structure and system of DTCs

wts study Global WTS PE Study A high-level overview of most discussed PE issues in EU, OECD and BRICS countries

Latest CJEU, EFTA and ECHR

Recent BEPS related legislation/guidance impacting Luxembourg

Analysing BEPS Impact Private Equity sector

21% 21% The Regional Finance Law provides that RAM can set a rate 20% lower than that applicable in Mainland Portugal 2.

Morocco Tax Guide 2012

E/C.18/2016/CRP.2 Attachment 9

Double Taxation Cases Outside the Transfer Pricing Area

1. Short overview of the Company Tax. Residence of Companies. The substance requirement can be described as follows :

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document. Proposal for a Council Directive

Austria Country Profile

International Tax Malta Highlights 2019

Impact of BEPS and Other International Tax Risks on the Jersey Funds Industry

Cyprus Tax Update. Kyiv May 2018

International Tax Primer Andrew D. Oppenheimer, Esq. October 31, 2017

Hong Kong SAR Tax Profile

How BEPS fits in with the EU s tax agenda. The European Union (EU) has actively participated in the entire

International Tax Greece Highlights 2019

Recent developments in international tax

Statistics on APAs in the EU at the End of 2016

Chapter 2. Dispute Channels. 1. Overview of common dispute process

International Tax United Kingdom Highlights 2019

Iceland Country Profile

WELCOME TO TAXING ISSUES THE QUARTERLY BULLETIN FROM CAPITAL GES

BEPS Impact on Private Equity

Norway Country Profile

Agreement on EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive

As a result, BAMLI Ltd has merged with our Irish entity, BAMLI DAC, forming single entity, BAMLI DAC.

Spanish Association of Collective Investment Schemes and Pension Funds

Transcription:

Practical European Tax Strategies WorldTrade Executive, Inc. The International Business Information Source TM REPORT ON TAX PLANNING FOR INTERNATIONAL COMPANIES OPERATING IN EUROPE Belgium Renovates and Generalizes Coordination Center Regime BY MARC QUAGHEBEUR (VANDENDIJK & PARTNERS, BRUSSELS) In 1982 Belgium introduced a special tax regime for coordination centers that inspired similar measures in France, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. At the time the European Commission approved the coordination center tax regime. However, times change and in 2003 the European Commission decided that the coordination center tax regime was incompatible with EU state aid rules. Belgium agreed to modify the coordination center regime and phase it out by 2010. Some 88 coordination centers are to loose their status by the end of this year and in order to give them plenty of time to adopt their structure to the new tax regime, the Belgian Parliament has adopted on 22 June 2005 (Belgian continued on page 14 Proposed Introduction of REITs in Germany and the UK A New Exit Opportunity for Real Estate Investors? BY OLIVER FELSENSTEIN AND CHRISTOPH KUEPPERS (LOVELLS) REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts) are tax efficient mechanisms that permit investors to own, operate and invest in real estate assets. REITs have existed for a long time in the United States where they are now the main form of organization for publicly-traded real estate companies. REITs have existed in France since 2003 (known in France as SIICs Societes d Investissements Immobilier Cotees). Recently both the German and the UK governments announced plans for adoption of their own REITs; they are currently the only G7 economies without REIT legislation. If the U.S., Spanish and French experiences are followed, real estate portfolio companies may elect REIT status mechanisms to benefit from tax advantages and to give sponsors an attractive exit alternative compared to a traditional IPO. continued on page 2 July 2005 Volume 7, Number 7 IN THIS ISSUE Compensation Taxation The UK Tax Revenue agency is taking a tougher approach for contracts with non-domiciled senior executives. Page 3 Belgium changes coordination center regime, which has been important for corporate financing activities, to comply with EU requirements. Page 1 Strategies reviews changes to the Czech Income Taxes Act. Page 5 Disputes It is often difficult for potential foreign investors to assess the implications of high profile disputes between taxpayers and the Russian tax authorities because the process of resolving such disputes differs significantly from tax administration in the potential investor s home country. Strategies provides an overview of the process. Page 9 Hybrid Entities The Netherlands has released a regulation that could deny tax treaty benefits to some U.S. companies. Page 11 REITs Germany and the UK have announced plans for REITs, which can be tax efficient mechanisms to own real estate. Page 1 Snapshots Japan, UK to revise tax treaty for bilateral investment. Page 4 New rules for Luxembourg for 1929 holding companies. Page 20 Practical European Tax Strategies WorldTrade Executive, Inc. 2005 1

Coordination centers are typically used for activities of a preparatory and auxiliary nature (sales promotion and advertising, collecting and spreading information, scientific research, and relations with national and international government institutions), but mostly for insurance and re-insurance, the centralizing of financial operations (for example, reinvoicing, factoring, financial leasing and financing), the hedging of foreign exchange risks and the centralizing of accounting, administration and data processing. Belgium from page 1 State Gazette 30 June 2005) a law that must make investments in equity significantly more attractive. Coordination Centers Belgian coordination centers have always been limited to large multinational groups with consolidated capital and reserves in excess of E 24,000,000 and a turnover of at least E240,000,000, and with a presence in at least four countries. Coordination centers can carry out certain financial and administrative coordination activities for the benefit of the companies of the group. Coordination centers are typically used for activities of a preparatory and auxiliary nature (sales promotion and advertising, collecting and spreading information, scientific research, and relations with national and international government institutions), but mostly for insurance and re-insurance, the centralizing of financial operations (for example, re-invoicing, factoring, financial leasing and financing), the hedging of foreign exchange risks and the centralizing of accounting, administration and data processing. Although Belgian coordination centers are liable to corporate income tax at the normal tax rate of 33.99 percent, this tax is levied on a notional tax base determined as a percentage of certain operating costs. Initially personnel and financing costs were even excluded from this tax base. Furthermore, coordination centers are exempt from the capital duty of 0.5 percent of the share capital issued and the annual tax on real estate owned. More importantly, the coordination center was exempted from the obligation to withhold tax at source on the dividends, interest and royalties it paid out. This made the coordination center a perfect vehicle for financing the companies of the group and to repatriate the profits to the parent company tax-free. Moreover, if the parent company financed the share capital of the coordination center with external funds, it could create a double dip. While it can deduct the interest for income tax purposes the companies of the group that are financed by the coordination center can also take a deduction for the interest paid. For the coordination center the operation is neutral as it is taxed on a notional tax basis from which the financing cost was excluded. The only major cost was the withholding tax on the interest paid out by the group companies. However, that is not an issue anymore since Belgium implemented EC Directive 2003/49/ EC of 9 June 2003 which introduced a common system of taxation applicable to interest and royalties made between associated EU companies. The coordination center was limited by a number of stringent conditions. The coordination center had to be approved by the Belgian authorities, it had to employ at least ten full-time employees in Belgium and the regime was limited to major multinational groups with a presence in at least four countries. In spite of these requirements, Belgium soon acquired an international reputation as a tax-attractive location for finance centers. The introduction of similar tax regimes in France, Bank Interest is tax deductible Dividend payment Withholding tax: 0% Belgian Coordination Center Corporate income tax : 0 Group Company 2 Interest payments Interest is tax deductible Withholding tax: 0 5 10 15 % Table 1 : Benefits of a coordination center in a multinational group 14 WorldTrade Executive, Inc. 2005 July 2005

Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands did not tarnish this reputation because Belgium offers a lot of other opportunities, a central location, a multilingual workforce, etc. The EU Code of Conduct Group put the Belgian coordination centers on the list of potentially harmful tax measures and in 2003 the European Commission decided that this center tax regime was incompatible with the EU state aid rules. The Belgian Government agreed to adapt the coordination center regime and to gradually phase it out by the end of 2010. The Finance Minister declared that on 31 December the tax regime is to come to an end for some 88 coordination centers. This would entail the loss of 10,000 jobs and would lead to a direct tax cost of E700 million ($907 million) for the Belgian Treasury. The New Tax Regime: The Risk Capital Deduction The Belgian Parliament has now adopted a law that introduces a valid alternative. Contrary to the coordination center regime, the new regime is creative and simple. As of next year, Belgian companies will be entitled to set off a new deduction against their profits. The idea behind the Risk Capital Deduction (which is also known as notional interest deduction ) is that debt financing should not be privileged to the detriment of equity financing. Interest paid on borrowed funds is indeed tax deductible for the company, while dividends paid to shareholders are subject to corporate income tax. Moreover, Belgium does not have any thin capital rules to speak of. The Risk Capital Deduction is a compensation for the economic cost that using its own equity means for a company; it is a form of long-term, risk-free financing. The deduction is a percentage of the company s equity to be calculated in function of the interest rate paid on 10-year linear bonds issued by the Belgian State during the past year. In June the rate was at an all time low of 3.21 percent. For the first tax year the percentage of the Risk Capital Deduction will be the average over 2005, 2006 will be the basis for the following tax year, and so on. However, the rate cannot vary more than 1 percent point from one year to the other. There is an overall ceiling of 6.5 percent but that is not engraved in stone: in years of high Annual averages of the interest rate on 10-year linear bonds issued by the Belgian State 2004 4.09% 2003 4.06% 2002 4.92% 2001 5.07% 2000 5.55% 1999 4.68% 1998 4.71% 1997 5.70% 1996 6.46% 1995 7.46% 1994 7.72% 1993 7.20% 1992 8.64% 1991 9.27% inflation the Government can raise the interest rate. For small and middle-sized companies the Risk Capital Deduction will be half a percentage point higher, if they waive the investment reserve to which they are entitled. The Risk Capital Deduction will be calculated in function of the company s share capital and retained earnings. To avoid double tax exemptions and abuses a number of elements are to be excluded from this equity. This is the case for participations which the company holds in its own share capital, or participations and shares recorded as financial fixed assets as well as for participations in equity UCITS for which the company is entitled to the participation exemption that limits the double taxation on dividends received. Most importantly, the net book value of an overseas permanent establishment (assets less liabilities attributable to the PE) and the net book value of overseas real property or real property rights are to be excluded from the company s equity. Capital subsidies are to be excluded as well, as are capital gains that are merely recorded in the company s accounts in respect of assets that are excluded from its equity for the calculation continued on page 16 Belgium does not have any thin capital rules to speak of. Practical European Tax Strategies WorldTrade Executive, Inc. 2005 15

Belgium from page 15 Tax liability. New Belgian Coordination Center Equity 3 000 Fees charged back : 100 Risk Capital Deduction : (105) 0 33.99% = 0 Fees : 200 Group Company 2 Fees : (200) 30% = (60) Tax saving: 60 Table 2 : Belgian Coordination Center new look with a Risk Capital Deduction of 3.5 percent For small and middle-sized companies the Risk Capital Deduction will be half a percentage point higher, if they waive the investment reserve to which they are entitled. of the Risk Capital Deduction. Further corrections are imposed to prevent the artificial inflation of the company s equity through the acquisition of tangible fixed assets at a cost that unreasonably exceeds the company s needs, of investments that are not intended to produce a regular taxable income (e.g. art, precious metals, etc) as well as of real property used by the director or his family. The value of the equity must be determined on the basis of the company s latest annual accounts established in accordance with the Belgian GAAR. However, changes during the accounting year are to be taken into account on a month-by-month basis. The purpose of this provision is to prevent the manipulation of the share capital to increase during the tax year. The Minister of Finance confirmed that he did not expect companies to record the variations in their reserves (retained earnings and profit/ loss accounts) on a month-by-month basis; what he wants to monitor are the changes in assets and shareholdings. A Belgian company does not need a prior approval or advance ruling to be entitled to this exemption. The exemption will be calculated in the company s tax return. There is one condition though: the company must record an amount equal to the capital risk deduction on a separate account on the liabilities side of its balance sheet and maintain it there for three years. This means that the company cannot distribute this tax-exempt profit by way of dividend for at least four years. Non-Belgian companies are entitled to the same deduction but only for the risk capital used for their Belgian permanent establishments or for their Belgian real estate or real estate entitlements. The Risk Capital Deduction cannot be combined with other favorable tax regimes Bank Loan 1 000 Tax liability. Interest : 40 Income : (40) 30% = (12) Equity 1 000 Interest income : 40 Belgian Financing Company Risk Capital Deduction : (35) 5 33.99% = 1.7 Loans 1 000 Interest : 40 Group Company 2 Interest paid : (40) 30% = (12) Tax saving : 22.3 Table 3 : Belgian Financing Company with an optimised Risk Capital Deduction of 3.5 percent 16 WorldTrade Executive, Inc. 2005 July 2005

Bank Tax liability. Loan 1 000 Interest income : 40 Interest: 40 Equity : 100 Interest paid : (40) Belgian Financing Company Risk Capital Deduction : (3.5) (3.5) 33.99% = 1.19 Loans : 1 000 Interest : 40 Group Company 2 Interest paid : (40) 30% = (12) Tax saving : 10.81 Table 4 : Belgian Financing Company with a Risk Capital Deduction of 3.5 percent such as coordination centers or companies in reconversion zones, open-ended and closedended UCITS or undertakings for collective investment in receivables, cooperative participation companies set up to allow employees to participate in the profits of their employer, and shipping companies that pay the tonnage tax. Conversely, this means that other favorable tax regimes such as the cost plus tax regime for branches of foreign companies or the tax shelter for the audiovisual industry do not exclude the Risk Capital Deduction. If the company cannot use part of the capital risk deduction, it can carry forward the deduction for seven years and set it off against profits of future years. In this respect, it is useful to point out that the capital risk deduction is taken before the carry forward of tax losses from previous years. At the same time, it is worthwhile mentioning that the right to carry forward the Risk Capital Deduction can be lost in the same way as the right to carry forward tax losses in the case of a change of control over the company that is purely taxdriven. A Winning Combination This new tax regime offers a large number of opportunities, in particular when used in a combination with some other elements of the Belgian tax legislation. 1.No capital duty anymore As of 1 January 2006, another hurdle to the capitalization of Belgian companies is to be brought down. Belgium is one of the countries that levies a capital duty on the share capital issued when a company is incorporated or when its share capital is increased. In other European countries (Austria, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland) the duty ranges between 0.5 and 1 percent. Belgium may have been at the lower end in the list of countries levying such a duty, and even if this duty was tax deductible, it was still perceived as an unnecessary cost for the company. The 0.5 percent capital duty will be replaced by a fixed duty of E25 (about $30). 2. No withholding tax on inbound interest and royalties By Royal Decree of 22 December 2003, Belgium has implemented the EC Directive 2003/ 49/EC of 9 June 2003 introducing a common system of taxation applicable to interest and royalties made between associated EU companies. No tax is withheld at source on the payment of interest between EU companies of the same group, if one EU company holds a 25 percent participation, or where a third EU company holds a 25 percent participation in both EU companies. The participation must be maintained for at least a year. 3. Minimizing corporate income tax liability Where the other companies of the group can pay out interest or royalties without having to withhold tax, the Risk Capital Deduction makes a Belgian company an even more attractive vehicle for financing and licensing companies. The deduction can neutralize the taxation of these interest or royalties, so that the Belgian company can pay out the dividends tax-free in the form of dividends. continued on page 18 Where the other companies of the group can pay out interest or royalties without having to withhold tax, the Risk Capital Deduction makes a Belgian company an even more attractive vehicle for financing and licensing companies. Practical European Tax Strategies WorldTrade Executive, Inc. 2005 17

Belgium from page 17 Tax liability. Equity 1 000 Royalties : 40 Belgian Licensing Company Risk Capital Deduction : (35) 5 33.99% = 1.7 Royalties : 40 Group Company 2 Royalties : (40) 30% = (12) Tax saving : 10.3 Table 5 : Belgian Licensing Company with a Risk Capital Deduction of 3.5 percent However, this is not the only way of limiting the corporate income tax liability. The Risk Capital Deduction can be combined other tax exemptions such as The tax exemption of EUR 12,440 for additional staff assigned full-time in Belgium to scientific research, the development of the technological potential of the company, or for the jobs of head of the export department or head of the total quality management department. This exemption is EUR 24,870 if the person As of next year, Belgian companies will be entitled to set off a new deduction against their profits. The idea behind the Risk Capital Deduction is that debt financing should not be privileged to the detriment of equity financing. recruited is a highly qualified researcher assigned to scientific research. The tax shelter for for audio-visual works. Corporate income taxpayers are entitled to a tax exemption of 150 per cent of the funds they invest in the production of Belgian audiovisual work; the investment is limited to one third of their taxable profits before tax. This tax exemption can be carried forward indefinitely. Moreover, it does not seem incompatible with a cost plus tax agreement for branches of foreign companies or with other existing cost plus regimes for distribution and service centers. 4. The Belgian holding company regime Belgium does not have any particular holding company regime but the general corporate income tax system provides for a partial exemption of dividends received from qualifying participations. Although it would not be advisable to combine the benefits of a coordination center and a holding company in the same legal entity, a combination of both can be worthwhile. Dividends are eligible for a 95 percent exemption if the parent company holds a participation that is at least 5 percent of the subsidiary s nominal share capital or, alternatively, that has an acquisition value of at least EUR 1,200,000. Moreover, the subsidiary must meet a subject-to-tax condition, i.e. it must not fall within any of the specific anti avoidance exclusions. Important is that capital gains on disposals of shares held in companies from which the dividends would benefit from the partial exemption at the time of the disposal are fully tax exempt. Finally, Belgium does not have any controlled-foreign company rules. 5. Advance rulings Like many other national tax administrations, the Belgian tax authorities want to provide greater certainty in tax matters to taxpayers, in particular to keep Belgium attractive for foreign investors. For that reason, Belgium has adapted its ruling practice to make it efficient, proactive and flexible and to provide the necessary certainty to Belgian taxpayers 18 WorldTrade Executive, Inc. 2005 July 2005

(see M. Quaghebeur, The Gateway between Europe and the Far East, Practical European Tax Strategies, May 2005, Vol. 7, Number 5, p. 18). Since 1 January 2005, the Office for Advance Decisions in tax matters has been reorganized to give it more autonomy, and to make it proactive and business-minded. The ruling committee should be able to provide rulings within a period of three months upon application for an advance ruling. The initial experience is certainly positive. 6. No withholding tax on dividends paid out to a parent subsidiary In accordance with the EC Parent- Subsidiary Directive, Belgium does not levy withholding tax on the dividends it pays out to a parent company that holds at least 20 percent in its share capital (or voting rights) for an uninterrupted period of at least 12 months (10 percent in 2009). Non-EU parent company will have to find a channel via Belgium s extensive treaty network to reduce the tax rate to 15, 10, 5 or even nil percent. Examples The Risk Capital Deduction can be the basis for a new type of coordination center regime. Given sufficient equity, any Belgian company (or even any Belgian permanent establishment) can start working as a coordination center for a group of companies. They can take on activities such as sales promotion and advertising, collecting and distributing information, scientific research, and relations with national and international government institutions) and other activities of a preparatory and auxiliary nature. The cost of these activities can be charged back to the group companies that use these services. Other options are insurance and reinsurance, centralization of financial operations, hedging of foreign exchange risks and centralization of accounting, administration and data processing. However, just like the coordination center, the Belgian company can be a vehicle to finance the group companies and to repatriate the profits tax-free. Moreover, if the parent company can finance the share capital of the Belgian financing company with borrowed funds, it can maximize its profit (table 3). Both the parent company and the group companies can set off the interest paid against their profits. Given sufficient funding, the Belgian Financing Other favorable tax regimes such as the cost plus tax regime for branches of foreign companies or the tax shelter for the audiovisual industry do not exclude the Risk Capital Deduction. Company can neutralize the interest income with the Risk Capital Deduction. The advantage of such transaction becomes clear in a comparison with a situation where the Belgian Financing Company organizes its own financing (Table 4). An alternative use for the Belgian company is as a licensing company. The figures would be the same as in table 2. Conclusion Belgium has acquired an international reputation as a tax-attractive location for finance centers, and this reputation has not been tarnished by similar tax regimes in France, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. The Risk Capital Deduction, combined with the abolition of the capital duty on the share capital issued, will put Belgian on the map again as a location for coordination centers and holding companies. Belgium has many opportunities that add to its central location in Europe and a multilingual work force: the special tax status for expatriate non-belgian employees, the favorable tax regime for Belgian holding companies without controlled foreign corporation rules, and a modernized advance ruling practice. The combination of these elements means that Belgium cannot be disregarded for any international tax planning. Marc Quaghebeur is with Vandendijk & Partners in Brussels. Practical European Tax Strategies WorldTrade Executive, Inc. 2005 19