Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Louisville Zone

Similar documents
Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Louisville Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. St. Louis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Little Rock Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Memphis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Little Rock Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Memphis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Little Rock Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Louisville Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Louisville Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Memphis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Louisville Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Memphis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Little Rock Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Little Rock Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Little Rock Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. St. Louis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. St. Louis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Memphis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. St. Louis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. St. Louis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Memphis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Memphis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Little Rock Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Memphis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Memphis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. St. Louis Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Little Rock Zone

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District. Memphis Zone

AGRICULTURAL Finance Monitor

Agricultural FINANCE Monitor

AGRICULTURAL Finance Monitor

AGRICULTURAL Finance Monitor

Agricultural FINANCE Monitor

The Beige Book. Summary of Economic Activity

The Arkansas Economic Outlook Focus on Hot Springs

AGRICULTURAL Finance Monitor

The Beige Book. Summary of Economic Activity

AGRICULTURAL Finance Monitor

AGRICULTURAL Finance Monitor

Arkansas Economic Outlook

The Beige Book. Summary of Economic Activity

The Beige Book. Summary of Economic Activity

The Beige Book. Summary of Economic Activity

The Beige Book. Summary of Economic Activity

Burgundy Book. Businesses Continue To Be Optimistic about Local Economic Conditions

Debt. In the third quarter of 2016, the upward. Consumer Debt Growth Stalls Despite Strong Sectors. Executive Summary

Burgundy Book. Third-Quarter Job Growth in Little Rock Rose at Its Fastest Rate Since 2006

Burgundy Book. Despite Slower Growth, Louisville Business Contacts Remain Optimistic

Burgundy Book. Robust Transportation and Manufacturing Fuel Rising Optimism in Louisville Zone

REGIONAL SUMMARIES. Nonfarm employment grew in the second quarter. Non-farm jobs totaled 56,900 in June, up from 55,500 in June 2016.

First Quarter 2016 Quarterly narrative REGIONAL SUMMARIES Fort Smith region Northwest Arkansas Central Arkansas Jonesboro

Burgundy Book Data Snapshot County unemployment rates (SA, Q1-16) The Memphis Zone Registers Better Data and an Improving Outlook 5.

Burgundy Book. Manufacturing Sector Continues to Hum Along Nicely. A report on economic conditions in the Louisville zone Third Quarter 2014

Burgundy Book. Recovery Continues at a Steady Pace as Manufacturing and Residential Housing Sectors Improve

Burgundy Book. Economic Conditions Improve in the Little Rock Zone. A report on economic conditions in the Little Rock zone Second Quarter 2014

Burgundy Book. Transportation Services Employment in St. Louis Advances at Rapid Pace

Burgundy Book. Little Rock Zone s Unemployment Rate Falls to Lowest Level Since 2008

Burgundy Book. Memphis Transportation Employment Enjoys Strongest Growth in Three Years

Burgundy Book. Surging Missouri Exports Fuel Gains in Durable-Good Manufacturing Employment

Burgundy Book. Business Contacts Are Split on the Outlook for the Local Economy in 2016

Burgundy Book. The Memphis Zone s Unemployment Rate Falls to its Lowest Level Since 2008

Burgundy Book. Mixed Bag: Business Optimism, Job Growth, but Higher Unemployment

Burgundy Book. Business Outlook Still Optimistic Despite Signs of Slightly Slower Growth

Burgundy Book. Low Unemployment and a Strong Housing Market Bolster the St. Louis Zone

Third Quarter 2015 An independent economic analysis of Arkansas three largest metro areas: Central Arkansas Northwest Arkansas The Fort Smith region

Burgundy Book. Mixed Signals in the Memphis Zone Produce Guarded Optimism for 2015

Burgundy Book. Yuletide Cheer in the St. Louis Zone: More Optimism and Lower Unemployment!

Analysis & Background

Employment in Central Oregon: January, 2015

Michigan Economic Update

Housingmarket. Tennessee. 2nd Quarter Business and Economic Research Center David Penn, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Economics

The Arkansas Economic Outlook

Southwest Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Fourth Quarter 2015

Liquidity of Eighth District Banks

Leeds Business Confidence Index

Metropolitan Area Economic and Business Conditions Report First Quarter 2014

MICHIANA BUSINESS. The Bureau of Business and Economic Research Presents: Page 1

ECONOMY AT A GLANCE. Figure 1. Leading indices. 1/18 2/18 3/18 4/18 5/18 6/18 7/18 8/18 9/18 10/1811/1812/18 1/19 Mississippi

Metro Milwaukee Economic Trends August 2018

Leeds Business Confidence Index

MISSISSIPPI S BUSINESS Monitoring the state s economy

Northeast Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report First Quarter 2014

Northeast Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Third Quarter 2015

Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report: First Quarter 2014

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Fourth Quarter 2014

Growth. Total non-farm Positive Nation , ,008,000

David A Penn, Director and Associate Professor Business and Economic Research Center Jones College of Business Middle Tennessee State University

1st Quarter Weekly Unemployment Claims -11% Total Home Permits* +44% Total Nonfarm Employment* +3% Mortgage Tax Collections +17%

Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Second Quarter 2016

ILLINOIS ECONOMIC REVIEW

Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Fourth Quarter 2015

Data Digest: Georgia. October 2013

Northeast Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report - First Quarter 2016

ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Leeds Business Confidence Index

Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Third Quarter 2016

Financing Local Government Expenditures

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report - Second Quarter 2015

ECONOMY AT A GLANCE. n April the value of the Mississippi Leading Index (MLI) rose 0.3 percent as seen

Businesses in Kentucky

Transcription:

Current Economic Conditions in the Eighth Federal Reserve District Louisville Zone March 23, 2012 Prepared by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Eighth Federal Reserve District ILLINOIS LINO INDIANA IA NA Springfield Columbia Jefferson City MISSOURI SOUR St. Louis Evansville Owensboro Louisville-Jefferson County Elizabethtown Bowling Green KEN ENTU NTUC UCKY Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers Jonesboro Fort Smith ARKAN ANSAS AS Jackson Memphis Little Rock-North Little Rock Hot Springs Pine Bluff TENNESSEE ES EE E Texarkana MISS SISSIP SSIPPISIP PI This report (known as the Burgundy Book) summarizes information on economic conditions in the Louisville zone of the Eighth Federal Reserve District (see map above), headquartered in St. Louis. Separate reports have also been prepared for the Little Rock, Memphis, and St. Louis zones and can be downloaded from research.stlouisfed.org/regecon/. The report includes government-provided data for Kentucky and the metro areas of the Louisville zone. These data are the most recent available at the time this report was assembled. NOTE: Metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) are larger geographic areas than cities, as defined by the Census Bureau. For more information, please contact the Louisville office: Maria G. Hampton, 502-568-9205, maria.g.hampton@stls.frb.org Economist: Alejandro Badel, 314-444-8712, alejandro.badel@stls.frb.org

Louisville Zone Report March 23, 2012 The most recent data at the time of publication show that Louisville is performing better than the nation in terms of annual employment growth, short-run employment growth, the issuance of building permits, and annual house price growth. The zone s unemployment rate is less favorable than the nation s. The following five points illustrate this assessment: Annual Changes in Employment By the end of January 2012, Louisville s nonfarm payroll employment was 2.6 percent higher than one year before, while national employment was 1.6 percent higher. Short-Term Changes in Employment Between November 2011 and January 2012, Louisville s local employment increased by an average rate of 0.4 percent per month, while national employment increased at an average rate of 0.2 percent per month. Unemployment Rate In Louisville, the unemployment rate decreased slightly, from 9.7 percent in October 2011 to 9.4 percent in December 2011. This rate was 0.9 percent greater than the 8.5 percent rate registered for the nation at the close of December. Building Permits The number of building permits issued in Louisville in January 2012 was 41.7 percent higher than the number issued during the same month in 2011. This rise was greater than the 28.6 percent increase experienced by the nation during the same period. House Prices At the close of the fourth quarter, housing prices were 1.1 percent lower in Louisville than they were at the same time last year. This decline in house prices was less than the 3.0 percent decline registered for the nation as a whole during the same period. Anecdotal Information from the Beige Book Agriculture and Natural Resources Year-to-date coal production (by early March) in Indiana was 7 percent lower relative to the same period in 2011; production in western Kentucky was 6 percent lower. The overall value of field crops in Indiana and Kentucky rose by 4 percent and 31 percent, respectively, from 2010 to 2011. Prices for the zone s crops generally increased from 2010 to 2011: Particularly large price gains were observed for the hay crop in Indiana (26 percent) and the corn crop in Kentucky (24 percent). Crop values were mostly higher in 2011, relative to 2010: The value of winter wheat increased by 125 percent and 115 percent in Indiana and Kentucky, respectively. Meanwhile, the value of soybeans fell by 7 percent in Indiana. Car Dealers January and early February sales increased compared with the same time last year for roughly 2 in 3 contacts; sales decreased for the remainder of contacts. Sales were expected to increase in March and April when compared with the same time last year for 2 in 3 contacts; the remaining contacts expected sales to be flat. Construction A general contractor contact in central Indiana noted that nonresidential construction has remained steady since the fourth quarter of 2011. Contacts in Owensboro-Daviess County have reported a significant number of public and private projects underway.

General Retailers January and early February sales increased compared with the same time last year for 1 in 3 contacts; sales decreased for 1 in 3 contacts. Sales met or exceeded expectations for roughly 2 in 3 contacts. Sales were expected to increase in March and April when compared with the same time last year for 2 in 3 contacts; the remaining contacts expected sales to be flat. Real Estate Contacts in the Louisville metropolitan area noted increased commercial real estate market activity since December 2011. Services Distribution, consulting, and health care contacts plan to hire workers and/or open new facilities. Manufacturing Automotive parts, automobile, stone, and primary metal contacts plan to hire workers and/or open new facilities. Faucet and paper product contacts plan to close plants and lay off workers. Detailed Indicators: Employment, Unemployment, Personal Income, and General Economic Activity Nonfarm Payroll Employment Growth Louisville MSA Percent 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 United States Louisville MSA 0.8 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 NOTE: 3-Month moving average, seasonally adjusted, January 2006 January 2012. SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Louisville s recession-related decline in employment, which was centered at the start of 2009, was similar to the nation s decline. The recovery in Louisville since then has been similar to that of the nation. While the recovery seemed to have slowed in Louisville during the first and second quarters of 2011, the expansion then restarted again in August 2011. Between November 2011 and January 2012, Louisville s employment grew at an average rate of 0.4 percent per month while national employment grew at an average rate of 0.2 percent per month.

Employment Growth by Sector Louisville MSA Percent 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 Total Nonfarm 100% Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 22% Education and Health 14% Government 13% Professional and Business Services 13% Manufacturing 11% Leisure and Hospitality 10% Financial Activities 7% Other Services 4% Natural Resources, Mining, and Construction 4% Information 2% NOTE: Percent change with respect to one year ago, January 2011 January 2012. SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment growth by sector during the past 12 months distinguishes general trends from sector-specific trends in Louisville s economic performance. Employment increased by 2.6 percent in this MSA with respect to one year ago, while the increase was only 1.6 percent for the nation. The three largest sectors in Louisville are Trade, Transportation, and Utilities; Education and Health; and Government. These three sectors account for 22 percent, 14 percent, and 13 percent of Louisville s employment, respectively, and expanded by 3.1 percent, 2.3 percent, and 1.5 percent in the past 12 months, respectively. The figure shows that employment growth varied across sectors, with 4 of 10 sectors reducing employment and the rest increasing employment. The Leisure and Hospitality sector had the best performance in Louisville (7.9 percent), while the Information sector had the worst performance ( 2.1 percent). Coincident Economic Activity Index Louisville Zone Index (Jan. 2008 = 100) 102 100 98 96 94 92 90 88 2008 2009 2010 2011 Indiana Kentucky United States SOURCE: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. The Philadelphia Fed s coincident index combines information on payroll employment, wages, unemployment, and hours of work to give a single measure of economic performance. The relevant index values suggest that the recession s impact was stronger for both Kentucky and Indiana than for the nation. In fact, the index values during the recession show that, at the lowest point, the level of economic activity in Kentucky and Indiana was at 91.1 percent and 88.7 percent of prerecession levels, respectively. Meanwhile, the nation s lowest point of economic activity was at 92.1 percent of its prerecession level. Since then, the recovery has followed a similar upward trend for Kentucky and the nation, while Indiana s coincident index has returned to positive trend in the fourth quarter of 2011. The current values of the index are 93.4 for Indiana, 95.9 for Kentucky, and 97.0 for the nation.

Employment and Unemployment by MSA Nonfarm payroll employment percent change, January 2011 January 2012 Unemployment rate Total Goods producing Service providing December 2011 Louisville, Ky. Ind. 2.59 1.39 2.79 9.4 Bowling Green, Ky. 0.86 5.94 0.21 8.4 Evansville, Ind. 0.82 0.78 1.28 7.7 United States 1.55 2.53 1.40 8.5 NOTE: Sector-level employment data are not available for Elizabethtown, Ky., or Owensboro, Ky; as a result, these MSAs are not included in this table. SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment expansion in the Louisville zone has been generally positive: The Louisville MSA experienced growth in both goods-producing and service-providing activities, while the Bowling Green MSA experienced strong growth in goods-producing activities. However, the highest unemployment rate in this zone, 9.4 percent, was also registered in the Louisville MSA. This unemployment rate was almost 1 percentage point higher than the 8.5 percent rate registered for the nation at the close of December 2011. 6 4 2 0 2 4 Real Personal Income Growth Louisville Zone Percent Indiana Kentucky United States 6 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 NOTE: Percent change with respect to previous year. SOURCE: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal income growth in Kentucky and Indiana was below the nation s for several quarters before the most recent recession (which started in the last quarter of 2007). The recession s impact on personal income was milder in Kentucky than for the nation, while the recession s impact on personal income in Indiana was roughly the same as the impact on the nation. Between the third quarter of 2010 and the third quarter of 2011, personal income grew by 0.5 percent in Kentucky and by 0.8 percent in Indiana. The nation experienced a 1.2 percent increase in personal income for the same period.

Residential Real Estate Activity by MSA Total building permits, units year-to-date House price index, percent change, January 2012 Percent change 2011:Q4/2010:Q4 Louisville, Ky. Ind. 146 41.7 1.1 Bowling Green, Ky. 34 8.1 0.2 Elizabethtown, Ky. 74 1,380.0 1.2 Evansville, Ind. 28 55.6 1.9 Owensboro, Ky. 13 18.8 0.5 United States 46,278 28.6 3.0 SOURCE: Bureau of the Census, Federal Housing Financing Authority. Real estate activity in the Louisville zone, at the end of 2011 and early 2012, was characterized by an increase in the issuance of building permits and mildly declining or increasing house prices across MSAs. The number of building permits issued in January 2012 was higher than the number issued during the same month in 2011 for all MSAs in the Louisville zone, except Bowling Green and Owensboro. The increases, which ranged from 41.7 percent to 1380.0 percent, were more pronounced in each of the MSAs than in the nation, where the issuance of building permits was 28.6 percent higher than it was last year. Meanwhile, house prices fell in only two of the five MSAs in the zone; and, for those registering price declines, the declines were milder than those experienced by the nation as a whole. The 1.1 percent house price decrease registered in Louisville relative to one year ago was the largest decline registered within the zone. This decline was milder than the 3.0 percent decrease registered at the national level. Finally, the largest increase in house prices among the zone s MSAs was registered in Evansville, where prices increased by 1.9 percent.