Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 December 2016)

Similar documents
Paraguay Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 27 June 2017)

Macau (China) Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 29 June 2017) General Information

The Independent State of Papua New Guinea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: )

St. Kitts and Nevis Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 09 May 2018) General Information

Thailand Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 18 September 2017) General Information

Bulgaria Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 December 2016)

Thailand Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 12 June 2018) General Information

Kenya Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 15 February 2018) General Information

Switzerland Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 1 September 2016) General Information

Maldives Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 29 November 2018) General Information

Slovenia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 01 May 2018) General Information

Argentina Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 1 September 2016) General Information

Saudi Arabia Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 25 January 2017)

Egypt Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 16 October 2018) General Information

Switzerland Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 24 August 2018)

Mauritius Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 19 April 2017) General Information

Austria Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 31 October 2017) General Information

Korea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 02 April 2018) General Information

Denmark Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 20 June 2017) General Information

Norway Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 30 September 2017) General Information

Brazil Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 13 February 2019) General Information

Republic of Korea Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 30 August 2017) General Information

Photo credits: Cover Rawpixel.com - Shutterstock.com

Photo credits: Cover Rawpixel.com - Shutterstock.com

Italy end inventory 100. Milestone 1 to End. Start to Milestone

OECD releases Switzerland s peer review report on implementation of BEPS Action 14 minimum standards

Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A)

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 UKRAINE. New paths ahead for international tax controversy

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2017 CROATIA

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2017 MOROCCO

BEPS Action 14: Making dispute resolution mechanisms more effective

Making Dispute Resolution More Effective MAP Peer Review Report, Canada (Stage 1)

Base Erosion and Profit Sharing Action Plan 11, 12, 14 & 15. Mr. S.P. Singh, Ex-IRS 7th November, 2015

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2017 UNITED STATES

BEPS Action 14: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

SOME RELEVANT TREATY ISSUES

ROMANIA TRANSFER PRICING COUNTRY PROFILE

IFA MUNICH. Strategic Approaches to Global Transfer Pricing Risk: the use of tax treaties through APA and MAP. 18 January 2018

Factsheet on the mutual agreement procedure May 2018

Controversy Trends. EMA Tax Summit. London, September 2016

OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations

Dispute Resolution: the Mutual Agreement Procedure

Bilateral Advance Pricing Agreement Guidelines

Tunisia. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Chapter 2. Dispute Channels. 1. Overview of common dispute process

OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Making Dispute Resolution More Effective MAP Peer Review Report, Spain (Stage 1)

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2017 CANADA

Statistics on APAs in the EU at the End of 2014

Revenue Arrangements for Implementing EU and OECD Exchange of Information Requirements In Respect of Tax Rulings

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2017 DENMARK

OECD releases the United States peer review report on implementation of BEPS Action 14 minimum standards

Guide for mutual agreement procedure pursuant to tax treaties (MAP) Contents

ROMANIA. minimum of 25% of the number/value of shares or voting rights in the two entities.

Switzerland. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months)

Statistics on APAs in the EU at the End of 2015

OECD releases Germany peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

OECD releases Singapore s peer review report on implementation of Action 14 minimum standard

OECD releases the United Kingdom peer review report on implementation of Action 14 minimum standards

Statistics on APAs in the EU at the End of 2016

Arbitration under Tax Treaties

Transfer Pricing Administration in Italy 2.0: Are all the Questions Finally Answered?

ANNEX II CHANGES TO THE UN MODEL DERIVING FROM THE REPORT ON BEPS ACTION PLAN 14

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

Australia. Transfer Pricing Country Profile. Updated February The Arm s Length Principle

Transfer Pricing - Japan

ST/SG/AC.8/2001/CRP.15

OECD releases Italy peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

OECD releases France peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

National Tax Agency, Japan

EUJOINTTRANSFERPRICINGFORUM PROCEDURAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ARBITRATION CONVENTION AND RELATED MUTUALAGREEMENT PROCEDURES

Current TP Litigation Scenario Alternative Resolution Mechanisms MAP & APA August 2010

Greece. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a

Japan. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months)

Transfer Pricing Updates and Challenges in Southern China

Germany. Transfer Pricing Country Profile. Updated October The Arm s Length Principle

APA Program Report 2007

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying the

Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com/gtps

Global Transfer Pricing Review

Annex. GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING ADVANCE PRICING ARRANGEMENTS UNDER THE MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCEDURE ("MAP APAs")

SECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

Ukraine. WTS Global Country TP Guide Last Update: December Legal Basis

New Zealand. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months) n.a. n.a

IRAS release of e-tax guide: Transfer Pricing Guidelines (Fourth edition)

Contents. Introduction. International Transfer Pricing: Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs)

Mutual agreement procedure based on Swiss double taxation agreements

NON-DISCRIMINATION IN BILATERAL TAX CONVENTIONS

EU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM

Release of BEPS discussion draft: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

APA Program Report 2009

Competent Authority Resolutions and APAs

OECD releases Luxembourg peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards

Note Provided by the Coordinator of the Working Group on General Issues in the Review of Commentaries

IRAS SUPPLEMENTARY CIRCULAR SUPPLEMENTARY ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDANCE ON ADVANCE PRICING ARRANGEMENTS

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Report prepared by the EU Joint Transfer Pricing Forum

EU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM

The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. And. The Government of the Isle of Man

NOTE ON DISPUTE RESOLUTION: PROPOSED NEW ARTICLE 25 COMMENTARY

E/C.18/2016/CRP.2 Attachment 9

MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENT

Transcription:

1 Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile (Last updated: 16 December 2016) General Information Georgia tax treaties are available at: http://mof.gov.ge/en/4681 MAP request should be made to: Mr. Giorgi Pataridze Head of Department for Administration Georgia Revenue Service (Tax and Customs Administration of Georgia) 16 Gorgasali st. 0114 Tbilisi, Georgia Phone: +995 (32) 2261143; Cell: +995(595)589558 Email: g.pataridze@rs.ge Mr. Giorgi Kandelaki Deputy Head of Department for Administration Georgia Revenue Service (Tax and Customs Administration of Georgia) 16 Gorgasali st. 0114 Tbilisi, Georgia Phone: +995(32)2261155; Cell: +995(577)053993 Email: g.kandelaki@rs.ge Mr. Guram Gogadze Head of Tax Risk Management Division of Department for Administration Georgia Revenue Service (Tax and Customs Administration of Georgia) 16 Gorgasali st. 0114 Tbilisi, Georgia Phone: +995(32)2262585; Cell: +995(599)042588 Email: guram.gogadze@rs.ge APA request should be made to: As there is not a specific regulation with regards to Competent authorities dealing with APA, presumably the CA(s) in charge MAP would be the proper contact persons. Georgia is working on the issue to clarify and define unambiguously CA(s) for the APA cases.

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile Preventing Disputes 2 A. Preventing Disputes 1. Are agreements reached by your competent authority to resolve difficulties or doubts arising as to the interpretation or application of your tax treaties in relation to issues of a general nature which concern, or which may concern, a category of taxpayers published? 2. Are bilateral APA programmes implemented? If yes: No According to Ministerial Decree 423 from 18/12/2013 on Approval of the Instructions on International Transfer Pricing, Advanced Pricing Agreement rules and procedures defined in Chapter 5 (Advanced Pricing Agreements) of the Instruction are applicable only to unilateral APAs, in accordance with the Article 129 1 of the Tax Code of Georgia (Art. 18 of the Decree). The next Article (Art.19) foresees the possibility of discussion of the bilateral or multilateral APA agreements, stating that procedures related to such agreements may differ from the procedures defined in this chapter and that the Revenue Service may announce additional interpretation on the necessary procedures related to the request for bilateral or multilateral APA. Article 23 (5) further mentions a possibility for Georgian Company to use the preliminary meeting before the lodging of application, among others for discussion of the possibility to make a bilateral or multilateral APA.

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile Preventing Disputes 3 a. b. c. d. e. Are rollback of APAs provided for in the bilateral APA programmes? Are there specific timeline for the filing of an APA request? Are rules, guidelines and procedures on how taxpayers can access and use bilateral APAs, including the specific information and documentation that should be submitted in a taxpayer s request for bilateral APA assistance, publicly available? Are there any fees charged to taxpayers for a bilateral APA request? Are statistics relating to bilateral APAs publicly available? There are not any further provisions regulating in detail the cases of bilateral or multilateral APA in Georgian Legislation. No 3. Is training provided to your officials involved in the auditing /examination of taxpayers to ensure that any assessments made by them are in accordance with Yes Comprehensive Seminar on the Application of Tax Treaties).

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile Preventing Disputes 4 4. the provisions of your tax treaties? Is other information available on preventing tax treatyrelated disputes? Notes: 1. An APA is an arrangement that determines, in advance of controlled transactions, an appropriate set of criteria (e.g. method, comparables and appropriate adjustments thereto, critical assumptions as to future events) for the determination of the transfer pricing for those transactions over a fixed period of time. (see definition of APA in the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations ( Transfer Pricing Guidelines )). 2. Situations may arise in which the issues resolved through an APA are relevant with respect to previous filed tax years not included within the original scope of the APA. The concept of rollback is further elaborated in paragraph 4.136 of Section F (Advance pricing arrangement) of Chapter IV of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines and in paragraph 69 of Section D.4.2 (Possible retrospective application ( Roll back )) of the Annex to Chapter IV (Guidelines for Conducting Advance Pricing Arrangements under the Mutual Agreement Procedure ( MAP APAs )) of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines. Simply put, the rollback of the APA is understood to mean that the outcome of the APA is applied to previous filed tax years not included within the original scope of the APA.

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile Availability and access to MAP 5 B. Availability and Access to MAP 5. Are transfer pricing cases covered within the scope of MAP? Yes Article 38. of the Ministerial Decree 423 from 18/12/2013 on Approval of the Instructions on International Transfer Pricing, deals with the Mutual Agreement Procedure for Transfer Pricing cases. 6. Are issues relating to the application of treaty antiabuse provision covered within the scope of MAP? See detailed explanation As such our Legislation doesn t foresee any restrictions with regards to the scope of the MAP. As we are still working on the secondary legislation with regards to the MAP, we do not have any detailed provisions dealing with this issue as yet. 7. Are issues relating to the application of domestic antiabuse provision covered within the scope of MAP? See detailed explanation See above question 6. 8. Are issues where there is already an audit settlement between the tax authority and the taxpayer covered within the scope of MAP? 9. Are double taxation cases resulting from bona fide taxpayer initiated foreign adjustments covered within the scope of MAP? 10. Are there any other treaty related issues not covered under s/n 5 to 9 which are not within the scope of MAP?

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile Availability and access to MAP 6 11. Are taxpayers allowed to request MAP assistance in cases where the taxpayer has sought to resolve the issue under dispute via the judicial and administrative remedies provided by the domestic law of your jurisdiction? 12. Are taxpayers allowed to request for MAP assistance in cases where the issue under dispute has already been decided via the judicial and administrative remedies provided by the domestic law of your jurisdiction? 13. Are rules, guidelines and procedures on how taxpayers can access and use MAP, including the specific information and documentation that should be submitted in a taxpayer s request for MAP assistance, publicly available? No 14. Are there specific timeline for the filing of a MAP request? 15. Are guidance on multilateral MAPs publicly available?

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile Availability and access to MAP 7 16. Are tax collection procedures suspended during the period a MAP case is pending? 17. Are there any fees charged to taxpayers for a MAP request? 18. Is there any other information available on availability and access to MAP?

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile Resolution of MAP cases 8 C. Resolution of MAP Cases 19. Are there any model timeframes for the steps taken by your competent authority from the receipt of a MAP case to the resolution of the case provided to taxpayers? 20. Are statistics relating to the time taken to resolve MAP cases publicly available? 21. Is interest or penalties resulting from adjustments made pursuant to a MAP agreement waived or dealt with as part of the MAP procedure? 22. Are the roles and responsibility of the MAP office publicly available, for example, is the mission statement of the MAP office available in the annual report of the organisation? 23. Is MAP arbitration a mechanism currently available for the resolution of tax treaty related disputes in any of your tax treaties? a. b. If not: Are there any legal limitations in your domestic law (for example in your constitution) to include MAP arbitration in your tax treaties? Does your treaty policy allow you to include MAP arbitration in your tax treaties? Only treaties with Italy (2004) and Netherlands (2003) provide for possibility of arbitration in certain MAP circumstances. See detailed explanation Under examination.

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile Resolution of MAP cases 9 24. Is the explanation of the relationship between the MAP and domestic law administrative and judicial remedies publicly available? If yes: No a. Does the guidance specifically address whether the competent authority considers that it is legally bound to follow a domestic court decision in the MAP or will not deviate from a domestic court decision as a matter of administrative policy or practice? 25. Are taxpayers allowed to request for multiyear resolution through the MAP of recurring issues with respect to filed tax years? 26. Do all your jurisdiction s tax treaties contain a provision which would oblige your jurisdiction to make corresponding adjustments or to grant access to the MAP with respect to the economic double taxation that may otherwise result from a primary transfer pricing adjustment (i.e. is paragraph 2 of Article 9 of the OECD Model Tax Convention or the UN Model Double Taxation Convention included in all of your jurisdiction s tax treaties)? See detailed explanation Out of 54 Tax Treaties of Georgia 43 Treaties contain provision which would oblige our jurisdiction to make corresponding adjustments or grant access to the MAP. The treaty with Japan doesn t include such provision. Treaty with Switzerland foresees only the possibility of consultation with a view to reach an agreement on the adjustment of profits. Treaties with Azerbaijan, Singapore, Qatar, Slovenia, Portugal, Belgium contain the wording that makes possible such adjustment where the party considers it

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile Resolution of MAP cases 10 justified. 27. Is there any other information available on resolution of MAP cases?

Georgia Dispute Resolution Profile Implementation of MAP Agreements 11 D. Implementation of MAP Agreements 28. Where the agreement reached by your competent authority through the MAP process leads to additional tax to be paid by your taxpayer, is there publicly available information on the timeframe the taxpayer could expect its tax position to be amended to reflect the agreement reached by the competent authority and/or for the additional tax to be paid? 29. Where the agreement reached by your competent authority through the MAP process leads to a refund of the tax due or paid by your taxpayer, are there publicly available information on the timeframe the taxpayer could expect its tax position to be amended to reflect the agreement reached by the competent authority and/or for a refund of the tax paid? 30. Are all mutual agreements reached through MAP implemented notwithstanding any time limits in your domestic law? 31. Is there any other information available on the implementation of MAP agreements?