Appollo Ispat Complex Ltd.

Similar documents
Moody s Approach to Assessing Credit Risk for Oil & Gas Companies. Gretchen French Vice President and Senior Credit Officer Moody s Investors Service

The ABCP Market. For the IMF Conference on Operationalizing Systemic Risk Monitoring, May 27, 2010

GIOA Conference Moody s Approach to Rating Government Investment Pools: CNAV and Bond Funds. Marty Duffy VP-Managed Investments Group

Stress Testing Challenges:

Euler Hermes Rating GmbH. Methodology: Issuer Rating. 31 May 2016 formally amended on 14 November 2017

October 11 Rating Actions Related to 2006 Subprime First-Lien RMBS

Moody s Revised Rating Methodology: US Local Government General Obligation Debt

National Bank of Pakistan

Announcement: Moody's Disclosures on Credit Ratings of Barbados, Government of Global Credit Research - 26 Mar 2012

Credit Opinion: Elisa Corporation

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Coty's CFR to B1; outlook negative 26 Nov 2018

Optimizing performance and profitability in the Basel III environment. Nicolas Kunghehian, Business Development Director

Improve liquidity management under a regulation framework. Nicolas Kunghehian

U.S. Corporate Issuers: Lending Surges Amid A Decline In Credit Risk In 1Q17

CARRIER FINANCIAL STRENGTH RATINGS Financial ratings reflect an insurance company's claims paying ability

An Overview of S&P s Local GO Criteria

Credit Opinion: Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig. Global Credit Research - 23 Sep Ratings. Contacts. Key Indicators

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 rating to Tustin Unified School District (USD) School Facilities Improvement District's (SFID) (CA) GO Bonds

Retail Risk Modeling Framework in the Current Environment. BRAD BRADLEY, SunTrust JUAN M. LICARI, Moody s Analytics

A.M. Best s Rating Approach. Anthony Diodato Group Vice President - North American Property & Casualty

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Blue Racer's senior notes to B2, rates new notes

Property / Casualty State of the Market. Greg Williams Vice President

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Dell's CFR to Ba2; outlook stable

Credit Opinion: ING Groep N.V.

Credit Opinion: Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten N.V.

Rating Methodology Banks and Financial Institutions

Canadian Life Insurance Industry

The Regional Outlook MARISA DI NATALE, DIRECTOR

Moody s/real Commercial Property Price Indices, December 2010

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Baa3 issuer rating to Eutelsat SA Global Credit Research - 28 Jan 2010

National Ratings Definitions

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Coty's CFR to Ba3; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 20 Mar 2018

Rating Transitions for Investment Grade Issuers Subject To Event Risk

Pojistovaci maklerstvi INPOL a.s.

Criteria For Assigning 'CCC+', 'CCC', 'CCC-', And 'CC' Ratings

Credit Opinion: Ascendas Real Estate Investment Trust

Spread Research: Rating Process & Rating Methodology

Municipal Utilities OVERVIEW & METHODOLOGY UPDATE. Ted Damutz, VP-Senior Credit Officer

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Banks

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades SURA Asset Management to Baa1; outlook stable

Best s Credit Rating Methodology (BCRM) & MPL Insurer Ratings

Methodology: Business Risk/Financial Risk Matrix Expanded

A.M. Best Market Briefing at the EAIC 2018

Credit Opinion: Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten N.V.

A.M. Best s Updated Credit Rating Methodology and Capital Model. Robert Raber Senior Financial Analyst A.M. Best Company

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades ENGIE to A2; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Apr 2016

February Request for Comment:

Corporate Finance. Refinement to ABL Ratings. Special Comment. Moody s Global. Summary. January Table of Contents: Analyst Contacts:

Rating Methodology Stephen Irwin, Vice President, A.M. Best Doniella Pliss, Managing Senior Financial Analyst, A.M. Best

University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario

Methodology: Business Risk/Financial Risk Matrix Expanded

Euler Hermes Rating GmbH. Project Rating Methodology (Real Estate) 30 June 2017

How We Rate Sovereigns

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Bharti's senior unsecured notes to Ba1 and assigns a Ba1 CFR; outlook negative 05 Feb 2019

Transitioning From the Great Recession to Recovery to Expansion

S3* RATING RATIONALE. CP 2 & 3 Rating

Global Credit Research Credit Opinion 1 DEC Credit Opinion: Pohjola Insurance Ltd. Pohjola Insurance Ltd. Helsinki, Finland.

Methodology Review Seminar

Vesteda Residential Fund FGR

Goldstar's Financial Condition Analysis for the Period from to

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa rating to Livingston County's (MI) $2.4 million

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Dufry's ratings to Ba2 from Ba3; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 15 May 2017

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Banks

U.S. Macroeconomic Outlook DAN WHITE, ECONOMIST

Jiming Zou, Vice President Senior Analyst. Asian Steel Producers Supply Glut and Low Prices Will Reduce Earnings and Keep Leverage High in 2016

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp., MBIA Inc. Ratings Raised On Reentry Into Financial Markets; Outlooks Are Stable

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Banco Popular to Ba3 from Ba1, negative outlook assigned Global Credit Research - 04 Jul 2013

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Rating Action: Moody's affirms EBRD's Aaa rating, maintains stable outlook 07 Dec 2018

Autobahnen-Und Schnellstrassen Finanzierungs

Credit Sensitive Fixed Income Market Data

The Case for A Rated Issuers

BESTWAY CEMENT LIMITED

Main Street Report Q1 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns (P)Baa1 rating to Brussels Airport Holding SA/NV's senior secured debt; stable outlook

Higher Education Ratings & Construction Risk

The Pakistan Credit Rating Agency Limited. Stable Initial 24 th October, 2017

Potential Bumps Ahead for U.S. Financial Markets RYAN SWEET, DIRECTOR OF REAL-TIME ECONOMICS SOHINI CHOWDHURY, DIRECTOR

Default Risk Jumps Sharply for Troubled Bank. Figure 1: Bankia SA s One-Year EDF Measure

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Announcement: Moody's reviews five J-REITs ratings for downgrade

MOODY'S AFFIRMS Aa3 RATING ON THE CITY OF LIVONIA'S (MI) OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT

Moody s/real Commercial Property Price Indices, January 2010

Credit Opinion: Corporación Andina de Fomento

U.S. Municipal Market The View From the Markets Presentation to the Federal Reserve Banks of Chicago, New York and Philadelphia

ECPI EMU GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT BOND INDEX

Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.

Announcement: Moody's places GDF SUEZ's A1 ratings on review for downgrade

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

S&P Global Ratings Definitions

Vier Gas Transport GmbH (Open Grid Europe Group)

D C CC CCC B BB BBB A AA AAA

Macquarie Group Ltd.

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades AT&T's senior unsecured rating to Baa2 after court ruling approving merger with Time Warner 15 Jun 2018

Global Credit Research - 24 Feb 2012 ASSIGNS A2 RATING TO $24.6 MILLION G.O. BONDS, 2012 SERIES A & B

Egan-Jones Ratings Company

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Intrum Justitia's Ba2 corporate family rating; outlook changed to stable Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Moody s/real Commercial Property Price Indices, May 2010

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Transcription:

2016 Credit Rating Report (Surveillance) CRAB I CRAB Ratings on Corporate Credit Digest I 12 May 2017 Page 1 of 5

Particulars Ratings Remarks BDT 2,734.0 Million Long-term Outstanding BDT 190.0 Million Cash Credit Equivalent Limit BDT 1,365.0 Million Short-term Funded Limit BDT 2,480.0 Million Short-term Non-funded Limit Outlook Lr- Loan rating, ST- Short Term, (Refer Appendix 2 for Rating History) Due to revolving nature, CRAB considers Cash Credit in the long-term rating scale. Date of Rating: 12 May 2016 BBB2 BBB2 (Lr) BBB2 (Lr) Stable Details are at Appendix 1 Validity: Entity rating is valid till 11 May 2017; loan ratings are valid up to limit expiry date of respective credit facilities or 11 May 2017 whichever is earlier. Rating based on audited financial statements up to 2015, bank liability (31 December 2015) and other relevant quantitative and qualitative information up to the date of rating declaration. Methodology: CRAB s Corporate Rating Methodology (www.crab.com.bd) Analysts Mir Arif Billah mab@crab.com.bd Md. Abdur Rahman Evan evan@crabrating.com Table 1: FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHT 2015 2014 Sales 5,137.0 4,946.7 Net Profit 509.0 373.6 EBITDA 1,158.0 1,022.5 Total Asset 10,986.0 9,891.6 Cash Flow From Operation 597.3 171.9 Shareholders' Equity 5,866.0 5,211.0 Borrowed Funded Loan Limit 4,289.0 4,132.0 Borrowed Fund Limit 6,769.0 5,452.0 Inventory Conversion Period 266 Days 349 Days Receivable Collection Period 135 Days 76 Days Payable Deferral Period 2 Days 3 Days Cash Conversion Cycle 399 Days 423 Days Quick Ratio 0.7 X 0.5 X Gross Profit Margin 22.2% 20.1% EBITDA Margin 22.5% 20.7% Net Profit Margin 9.9% 7.6% Return on Capital Employed 6.3% 5.0% Fixed Asset Turnover 1.8 X 1.4 X Borrowed Fund to Equity 0.7 X 0.8 X Sales to Borrowed Fund (Limit) 2.4 X 1.9 X Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.0 X 1.0 X Times Interest Earned Ratio 1.8 X 1.7 X Cash Flow From Operation to Sales 11.6% 3.5% Note: Amount in BDT Million RATIONALE the Company increased by 11.1% over past year. Total Shareholders Equity was BDT 7,007.0 million as of June 2015. Equity Debt position improved in recent year of the Company due to listing in capital market and timely repayment of long-term loan. Borrowed Fund to Equity improved to 0.7 X from 0.8 X. In addition, Sales to Borrowed Fund increased to 2.4 X. Credit Rating Agency of Bangladesh Ltd. has upgraded rating of to BBB2 (Pronounced Triple B Two) from BBB3. CRAB has also upgraded the rating of BDT 2,734.0 million long-term loan and BDT 190.0 million cash credit loan of the Company to BBB2 (Lr). CRAB has upgraded to rating in the shortterm of BDT 1,365.0 million funded and BDT 2,480.0 million non-funded loan. CRAB assigned Stable Outlook to the ratings of Appollo Ispat Complex Ltd., a public limited company, started its commercial operation in 1997. The Company is engaged in manufacturing and selling of Galvanized Corrugated Iron sheet through Galvanizing unit and manufacturing Cold Sheet from Hot Rolled coil. In 2013, the Company got listed in the capital market. The Company had BDT 10,986.0 million total assets comprised of 26.9% Inventory, 25.8% Property, Plant and Equipment and 17.5% Accounts Receivable. The Company had also invested BDT 101.0 million in Palash Spinning Ltd. and Phoenix Holdings Ltd. CRAB considers this is poor investment since the companies are not in operation for years. In 2015, total asset of Page 2 of 5

In 2015, total revenue of the Company was BDT 5,137.0 million, which was 3.8% lower compared to previous year. Cost of Goods Sold percent to Sales also slightly improved in 2015. Lengthy Cash Conversion Cycle put the Company weak liquidity position. Huge inventory piling and lingering collection period put the Company 399 Day Cash Conversion Cycle. Slightly improvement in operating performance also helped the Company improved cash flow position. In 2015, Cash Flow From Operation stood BDT 597.3 million, which was 2.5 times of 2014. For the first time in recent past, the Company saw positive Free Cash Flow in 2015 viz. BDT 327.3 million despite having BDT 270.0 million capital expenditure. Sales increases positively impacted on overall profitability ratios. COGS as percent of Sales decreased slightly. Moreover, operating cost efficiency helped the Company get higher EBIT Margin (20.7%). CRAB observed improved Fixed Asset Turnover ratio (1.8 X). CRAB observed improved leverage position and comfortable coverage position. Sales to Borrowed Fund increased to 2.4 X from 1.9 X. CRAB observed modest Coverage position of the Company. In 2015, Debt Service Coverage Ratio was marginally one, however, Times Interest Earned Ratio was in more comfortable zone viz. 1.8 X. Companies rated in this category have adequate capacity to meet financial commitments, but are more susceptible to adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances. Page 3 of 5

Appendix 1: Bank loan facilities of (31 December 2015) Sl. Bank Facility Term Category Fund Category Sanctioned Outstandi ng Expiry Date 1 IFIC Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 800.0 654.0 21-Jan-18 2 IFIC Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 68.0 68.0 31-Dec-16 3 IFIC Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 101.0 101.0 31-Dec-16 4 Bank Asia Term Loan Long-term Funded 37.0 30.0 29-Dec-17 5 Bank Asia Term Loan Long-term Funded 219.0 189.0 29-Dec-18 6 Bank Asia Term Loan Long-term Funded 15.0 13.0 29-Dec-17 7 Bank Asia Term Loan Long-term Funded 151.0 115.0 16-Aug-17 8 Bank Asia Term Loan Long-term Funded 51.0 38.0 16-Aug-17 9 NCC Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 370.0 234.0 31-Dec-16 10 Mercantile Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 329.0 213.0 31-Dec-17 11 Social Islami Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 266.0 135.0 9-Feb-18 12 Mutual Trust Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 200.0 118.0 30-Jun-18 13 Mutual Trust Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 45.0 21.0 30-Dec-16 14 Mutual Trust Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 28.0 13.0 30-Dec-16 15 Mutual Trust Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 85.0 61.0 30-Jun-16 16 Islamic Finance and Investment Term Loan Long-term Funded 150.0 147.0 10-Apr-20 17 Southeast Bank Term Loan Long-term Funded 200.0 152.0 31-Mar-16 18 19 Phoenix Finance and Investments Phoenix Finance and Investments Term Loan Long-term Funded 280.0 282.0 31-Dec-20 Term Loan Long-term Funded 50.0 50.0 30-Jun-21 20 Jamuna Bank Overdraft Short-term Funded 40.0 40.0 30-Apr-16 21 Jamuna Bank Time Loan Short-term Funded 60.0 60.0 30-Apr-16 22 Jamuna Bank Short-term Funded 150.0 150.0 30-Apr-16 23 IFIC Bank Overdraft Short-term Funded 150.0 150.0 30-Apr-16 24 IFIC Bank Short Term Loan Short-term Funded 100.0 100.0 30-Apr-16 25 IFIC Bank Demand Loan Short-term Funded 197.0 197.0 30-Apr-16 26 IFIC Bank Short-term Funded 130.0 173.0 30-Apr-16 27 GSP Finance Company Lease Finance Long-term Funded 100.0 100.0 22-Dec-16 28 Mutual Trust Bank 29 Southeast Bank Short-term Funded 128.0 40.0 27-Aug-16 Short-term Funded 600.0 58.0 31-Dec-16 30 IFIC Bank Letter of Credit Short-term Non-funded 1,000.0 800.0 31-Dec-16 31 Jamuna Bank Letter of Credit Short-term Non-funded 680.0 390.0 30-Apr-16 32 Mutual Trust Bank Letter of Credit Short-term Non-funded 200 120 27-Aug-16 33 Southeast Bank Letter of Credit Short-term Non-funded 600.0 0.0 31-Dec-16 Note: Amount in BDT Million www.crab.com.bd; www.crabrating.com Page 4 of 5

CRAB RATING SCALES AND S Long Term (Corporate) AAA Triple A AA1, AA2, AA3* Double A A1, A2, A3 Single A BBB1, BBB2, BBB3 Triple B BB1, BB2, BB3 Double B Companies rated in this cat egory have extremely strong ca pacity to meet financial commit ments. These companies are judged to be of the highest quality, with minimal credit risk. Companies rated in this category have very strong ca pacity to meet financial commit ments. These companies are judged t o be of very high quality, subject t o v ery low credit risk. Companies rated in t his cat egory have strong ca pacity to meet financial commit ment s, but are susceptible to the adverse eff ects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions. These compa nies are judged to be of high quality, subject to low cr edit risk. Companies rated in this category have a dequate capacity t o meet financial commit ments but more susceptible to adverse economic conditions or changing circumsta nces. These companies are subject to moderate credit risk. Such compa nies possess certain speculative characteristics. Companies rated in this category have ina dequat e ca pacity to meet financial commit ment s. Have ma jor ongoing uncertainties and exposure t o adverse business, financial, or economic conditions. These compa nies have speculative element s, subject to substantial credit risk. B1, B2, B3 Companies rated in this cat egory have weak capacity to meet financial commit ments. These companies have speculative elements, subject t o high credit risk. Single B CCC1, CCC2, Companies rated in this category have very weak capacity to meet fina ncial obligations. These companies have very weak standing and are subject to v ery high credit CCC3 risk. Triple C CC Companies rated in this cat egory have extremely w eak capacity to meet fina ncial obligations. These companies are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, Double C default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and int erest. Companies rated in t his category are highly vulnerable to non-pay ment, have pay ment arrearages allow ed by t he ter ms of the documents, or subject of bankruptcy C petition, but have not experienced a pay ment default. Payments may have been suspended in a ccordance with the instrument's t er ms. These compa nies are typically in Single C default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or int erest. D D rating will also be used upon the filing of a ba nkruptcy petition or similar action if pay ments on a n obligation are jeopardiz ed. (Default) *Not e: CRAB a ppends numerical modifiers 1, 2, a nd 3 to each generic rating classification from AA through CCC. The modifier 1 indicates t hat the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicat es a ranking in the low er end of that generic rating cat egory. LONG-TERM RATING: LOANS/FACILITIES FROM BANKS/FIS (All loa ns/facilities with original mat urity exceeding one year) AAA (Lr) Loans/facilities rated AAA (Lr) are judged to off er the highest degree of safety, with regard to timely pay ment of fina ncial obligations. Any adverse changes in (Triple A) circumsta nces are unlikely to affect t he pay ments on t he loan facility. Highest Safety AA (Lr)* Loans/facilities rated AA (Lr) are judged t o off er a high degree of saf ety, with regard t o timely pay ment of financial obligations. They diff er only marginally in saf ety (Double A) from AAA (Lr) rated facilities. High Safety A (Lr) Loan/facilities rated A (Lr) are judged to off er an adequate degree of safety, wit h regard t o timely pay ment of financial obligations. How ever, changes in Adequate Safety circumsta nces can adv ersely affect such issues more t han t hose in t he higher rating cat egories. BBB (Lr) Loans/facilities rated B BB (Lr) are judged to offer moderate safety, wit h regard to timely pay ment of fina ncial obligations for the present ; how ever, changing (Triple B) circumsta nces are mor e likely to lead to a w eakened ca pacity to pay int erest and repay principal t han for issues in higher rating cat egories. Moderate Saf ety BB (Lr) Loans/facilities rated B B (Lr) are judged to carry inadequat e safety, with regard to timely pay ment of fina ncial obligations; they are less likely to default in the (Double B) immediate fut ure than instrument s in low er rating categories, but a n a dverse change in circumstances could lead to ina dequate capa city to make pay ment on Ina dequate financial obligations. Saf ety B (Lr) Loans/facilities rated B (Lr) are judged t o have high risk of default; while currently financial obligations are met, a dverse business or economic conditions would High Risk lead t o lack of ability or willingness t o pay int erest or principal. CCC (Lr) Loans/facilities rated CCC (Lr) are judged t o have factors present t hat make them very highly vulnerable to default ; timely pay ment of financial obligations is V ery High Risk possible only if favorable circumstances continue. CC (Lr) Extremely High Loans/facilities rated CC (Lr) are judged to be extremely vulnerable t o default ; timely pay ment of financial obligations is possible only through external support. Risk Loans/facilities rated C (Lr) are currently highly vulnerable to non-pay ment, having obligations with pay ment arrearages allow ed by t he t er ms of the documents, or C (Lr) obligations t hat are subject of a bankruptcy petition or similar action but have not experienced a pay ment defa ult. C is typically in default, with little prospect for Near to Default recovery of principal or int erest. C (Lr) are typically in default, with little prospect for recov ery of principal or int erest. D (Lr) Loans/facilities rated D (Lr) are in default or are expect ed to default on scheduled pay ment dat es. Defa ult *Not e: CRAB a ppends numerical modifiers 1, 2, a nd 3 to each generic rating classification from AA through CCC. The modifier 1 indicates t hat the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicat es a ranking in the low er end of that generic rating cat egory. SHORT-TERM CREDIT RATING: LOANS/FACILITIES OF BANKS/FIS (All loa ns/facilities with original mat urity within one year) ST-1 This rating indicat es t hat the degree of safety regarding timely pay ment on the loans/facilities is v ery strong. Highest Grade ST-2 This rating indicates that t he degree of safety regarding timely payment on t he loa ns/facilities is strong; how ever, the relative degree of saf ety is lower tha n that for High Grade issues rated higher. This rating indicat es that t he degree of safety regarding timely pay ment on the loans/facilities is adequate; how ever, the issues are more vulnerable t o t he adv erse Adequate effects of cha nging circumstances than issues rated in the two higher categories. Grade ST-4 This rating indicat es that the degree of safety regarding timely pay ment on the loans/facilities is marginal; and t he issues are quite vulnerable to t he adverse eff ects Marginal of cha nging circumstances. ST-5 This rating indicat es t hat the degree of saf ety regarding timely pay ment on t he loans/facilities is minimal, and it is likely to be adversely affect ed by short-ter m Inadequate adversity or less favorable conditions. Grade ST-6 This rating indicat es t hat the loans/facilities are expect ed t o be in default on maturity or is in default. Low est Grade Copyright 2016, CREDIT RATING AGENCY OF BANGLADESH LIMITED ("CRAB"). All rights reserved. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQU ENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT CRAB S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtain ed by CRAB from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mech anical error as well as other factors, however, such information is provided as is without warranty of any kind and CRAB, in particular, makes no represent ation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timelin ess, complet eness, merch ant ability or fitness for any particular purpose of any such info rmation. Under no circu mst ances shall CRAB have any liability to any person or entit y for (a) any loss or damag e in whole or in part cau sed by, result ing from, or relatin g to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or conting ency with in or outside th e control of CRAB or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in conn ection with the procurement, collection, compilat ion, analysis, int erpret ation, communication, publicat ion or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequent ial, co mpen satory or incident al damages what soever (including without limitatio n, lost profits), even if CRAB is advised in advance of the possibility of such damag es, result ing from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The credit ratings and fin ancial report ing analysis observations, if any, constituting part of the informat ion contain ed herein are, and must be constru ed solely as, statement s of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendat ions to purchase, sell or hold any securities. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY CRAB IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Each rating or oth er opin ion mu st be weigh ed solely as on e factor in any investment decision made by o r on beh alf of an y user of the info rmation cont ain ed herein, and each such user must accordin gly make its own study and evaluat ion of each securit y and of each issu er and gu aranto r of, and each provider of credit support for, each securit y that it may consider purch asing, holding or sellin g. Page 5 of 5