Generally, these final rules will become effective on October 1, 2012, and can be found on the CFTC website at:

Similar documents
ensure the involvement of an adequate cross-section of market participants from the beginning of the implementation of the new regulatory regime.

Category 1: provisions that require a rulemaking; Category 2: self-effectuating provisions that reference terms that require further definition;

January 18, To Our Clients and Friends:

Dodd-Frank Title VII Update: Where Are We Today and Where Are We Going? Ten Important Issues Facing Derivatives Users

CLIENT UPDATE FINAL CFTC RULES ON CLEARING EXEMPTION FOR SWAPS BETWEEN CERTAIN AFFILIATED ENTITIES

CFTC ISSUES MULTIPLE NO-ACTION LETTERS ON REPORTING AND BUSINESS CONDUCT RULES. Portfolio reconciliation; Swap trading relationship documentation;

U.S. Resolution Stay Regulations and the ISDA 2018 U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol

January 24, To Our Clients and Friends:

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Dodd-Frank Title VII: Three Years Out, Still Buyer Beware

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Dodd Frank Swaps Regulation. David Lucking: Partner, New York

June 8, v1

THE DODD-FRANK ACT & DERIVATIVES MARKET

Re: RIN 3038 AD51 - Notice of Proposed Rulemaking - Customer Clearing Documentation and Timing of Acceptance for Clearing (76 Fed. Reg.

Client Update Final CFTC Rules on Aggregation of Positions

Client Update CFTC Adopts Margin Rules for Non-Cleared Swaps

CFTC Adopts Rules Establishing Swap Reporting Regime

Request concerning Application of Regulation on OTC Derivatives to Cross- Border Transactions

CFTC Chairman Publishes White Paper: Swaps Regulation Version 2.0

Safeguarding the Integrity of the Derivatives Markets

Dodd-Frank Act OTC Derivatives Reform

January 7, Re: Comments in Response to CME Submission #

February 2, To Our Clients and Friends:

Regulatory Impact of. on the Energy Industry

ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act

CLIENT UPDATE THREE NO-ACTION LETTERS ON SWAP REPORTING OBLIGATIONS

Considerations for End-Users January 2014

PLI Advanced Swaps & Other Derivatives 2016 Clearing Panel. Customer Funds Segregation for Cleared Derivatives Under the CEA Framework

ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act

Demystifying Dodd Frank s Impact on Corporate Hedging

FIA Webinar: Understanding Regulation AT December 16, 2015

Re: Commodity Futures Trading Commission Request for Public Input on Simplifying CFTC Rules (Project KISS)

CLIENT UPDATE SEC AND CFTC ISSUE FINAL RULES ON IDENTITY THEFT PROTECTION

Re: Public Meeting of the Technology Advisory Committee (TAC) on February 10

Client Update CFTC Issues Preliminary Report on Swap Dealer De Minimis Exception

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. 50 Collyer Quay #09-01 OUE Bayfront, Singapore P

Dodd-Frank Title VII Rule Compliance Schedules A Matrix

February 22, RIN 3038 AD20 -- Swap Data Repositories. Dear Mr. Stawick:

DERIVATIVES & STRUCTURED PRODUCTS

Account Ownership & Control Reporting

Investment Management Alert

Re: Confirmation, Portfolio Reconciliation, and Portfolio Compression Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants [RIN 3038-AC96]

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre st Street, NW, Washington, DC Telephone: (202)

January 3, Re: Comments Regarding CFTC s Proposed Rule Pertaining to the Process for Review of Swaps for Mandatory Clearing

CFTC Adopts Internal Business Conduct Rules

End-User Guide to CFTC Implementation of Dodd-Frank Act

Introduction. Reporting The Future: The CFTC s Final Rule On Real-Time Public Reporting Of Swap Data. January 17, 2012

Dodd-frank implementation update: key differences between the CFTC and SEC final business conduct standards and related cross-border requirements

E-ALERT Dodd-Frank Act

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Clearing Exemption for Swaps between Certain Affiliated Entities (RIN 3038-AD47)

Commodity Broker Bankruptcies and the ABA Part 190 Project Kathryn M. Trkla Foley & Lardner LLP (December 2017)

Dodd Frank and inter affiliate trading of derivatives

A View From the Street

Advanced Swaps & Other Derivatives 2016

August 13, De Minimis Exception to the Swap Dealer Definition (RIN 3038 AE68)

EDF TRADING A leader in the international wholesale energy market. 27 February 2012

Today, I will focus my comments on FCMs and their views, particularly with regards to pretrade risk controls.

CFTC Issues Final Rules on Cross- Border Uncleared Swap Margin Requirements

Review of Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements (RIN 3038-AE12)

CLIENT UPDATE DOL CLARIFIES ROLE OF CLEARING MEMBERS IN CLEARED SWAPS INTRODUCTION

REGULATION OF OTC DERIVATIVES Professor Jasmin Sethi. SEC University Spring 2014 Wednesday 5:45 PM 8:00 PM

Key Dodd-Frank Regulatory Issues for International Banks: Over-the-Counter Derivatives and the Volcker Rule

Request for Relief from the Trade Execution Requirement for Swaps Executed as Part of Package Transactions in the Interest Rate Asset Class

Swap Clearinghouses and Markets

Re: Swap Trading Relationship Documentation Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants / 17 CFR Part 23 / RIN 3038 AC96

The Treasury Report s Recommendations for Derivatives Regulation

Table of Contents. August 2010 Arnold & Porter LLP

Impact on End Users of Swaps

State Street Corporation

BLOOMBERG SEF BSEF <GO>

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

What should be of interest in Dodd-Frank to non-u.s. banks wanting to do business in the United States?

describe the main legal implications of different levels of segregation.

October 25, Dear Ms. Jurgens:

Key Differences Between the CFTC and SEC Final Business Conduct Standards and Related Cross-Border Requirements

April 24, Re: Interim Final Rule on Swap Data Repositories - Access to SDR Data by Market Participants (RIN 3038-AE14)

OTC Derivatives Markets Act of 2009

U.S. Response: Jurisdictions Authority and Process for Exercising Deference in Relation to OTC Derivatives Regulation

Disclosure Document. DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC. Revised as of: 8/21/2017

/SDA. David Stawick Secretary Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three Lafayette Centre st Street, NW. Washington, DC 20581

FSB- G20 - MONITORING PROGRESS the United States September 2011

CFTC Federal Register Notice

CME ClearPort API. CME Repository Services Trade Reporting API OTC IRS

The de minimis exception to designation as a Swap Dealer should be available to regional banks and dealers that intermediate regional Swap markets.

Dodd Frank Update: Impact on Gas & Power Transactions

CME ClearPort API CME Repository Services Trade Reporting API - Commodities

December 6, To Our Clients and Friends:

The road to reform. Helping commercial end users of OTC derivatives comply with Dodd-Frank s Title VII

Comment on TW SEF LLC Self-Certification for Swaps Made Available to Trade

EFRP FAQs. November 20, 2017

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC

Dodd-Frank 2013 What You Need to Know

Safe, Efficient Markets. Re: De Minimis Exception to the Swap Dealer Definition; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Via online submission to ESMA: The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) 20 May 2016

Clearing Requirement Determination Under Section 2(h) of the CEA RIN Number 3038 AD86

Swap Transaction Reporting Requirements

CME ClearPort API. CME Repository Services Trade Reporting API OTC FX

Proposed Revisions to the Volcker Rule s Implementing Rules Select Proposals and Open Questions

Overview of Regulatory Framework for Derivatives:

Transcription:

FINAL RULES FOR CLEARING DOCUMENTATION, TIMING OF ACCEPTANCE FOR CLEARING, AND CLEARING MEMBER RISK MANAGEMENT April 5, 2012 To Our Clients and Friends: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the CFTC ) has recently adopted final rules to implement (i) the prohibition of certain terms in the documentation between a customer and a futures commission merchant ( FCM ) that clears trades on behalf of the customer, (ii) the timing of acceptance and rejection of trades for clearing by a derivatives clearing organization ( DCO ) and its clearing members, and (iii) the risk management procedures of FCMs, Swap Dealers ( SDs ) and Major Swap Participants ( MSPs ) that are also clearing members. Generally, these final rules will become effective on October 1, 2012, and can be found on the CFTC website at: http://cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/federalregister032012.pdf CUSTOMER CLEARING DOCUMENTATION The CFTC has issued final rules applicable to FCMs, SDs and MSPs that prohibit each of them from entering into with a customer (in the case of an FCM) or a counterparty that is a customer of an FCM (in the case of an SD or MSP), or requiring the entering into by such customer or counterparty of, any arrangement that: discloses to the FCM or any SD or MSP the identity of the customer s original executing counterparty; limits the number of counterparties with whom a customer may enter into a trade; restricts the size of the position a customer may take with any individual counterparty, except for an overall limit for all positions of that customer at a FCM; or impairs a customer s access to execution of a trade on terms that have a reasonable relationship to the best available terms.

In addition, the Final Rules prohibit a DCO from requiring, as a condition for accepting a swap for clearing, that an FCM enter into any arrangement described above with a customer. The CFTC states that these rules are intended to prevent certain provisions that have been developed in the industry template documentation for clearing arrangements, which buy-side firms feared would allow an FCM to favor its affiliated execution desks to the detriment of the customer. The industry template documentation would also permit a customer s FCM to set specific credit limits on how many trades that customer can enter into with any SDcounterparty. The buy-side firms were concerned that an FCM, in setting those SD-specific credit limits, would favor its affiliated SD, which in turn would limit the number of executing counterparties a customer could actually use. In the accompanying Release, the CFTC notes that disclosing a customer s original executing counterparty could have anti-competitive effects and limiting the number of counterparties or restricting the size of trades with particular counterparties could hurt a customer s access to best pricing, impede general market liquidity and slow down acceptance of trades for clearing. The CFTC clarifies that these rules only apply to swaps and do not otherwise prohibit an SD or a MSP from setting bilateral limits with each of its counterparties. The rules also do not impair an SD s or a MSP s ability to conduct counterparty due diligence. TIME FRAME FOR ACCEPTANCE INTO CLEARING The CFTC sets the following time frame for the clearing of swaps not executed on a swap execution facility (a SEF ) or a designated contract market (a DCM ): For each swap subject to mandatory clearing requirement, each SD or MSP must submit such swap for clearing to a DCO as soon as technologically practicable after its execution, but not later than the close of business of the day of execution. For each swap not subject to mandatory clearing requirement but accepted for clearing by a DCO, and for which an SD or MSP and its counterparty have elected for clearing, the SD or MSP must submit such swap for clearing not later than the next business day after the execution of such swap or the agreement to clear, if such agreement occurs after its execution. In the accompanying Release, the CFTC states that the definition of business day will be left to the discretion of the DCOs so that each DCO can decide to expand its business hours to achieve a competitive edge in the marketplace. www.debevoise.com Page 2

To further promote efficient clearing, the CFTC has also issued a number of rules that mandate coordination among SDs, MSPs and the DCOs. Therefore, all SDs and MSPs must ensure that they have the capacity to route trades not executed on a SEF or DCM to a DCO in a manner acceptable to the DCO for clearing and must coordinate with all relevant DCOs to facilitate prompt and efficient processing of the trades. Similarly, all DCOs are required to coordinate with the DCMs and SEFs that list for trading a product that is cleared on those DCOs to develop rules and procedures to facilitate the prompt, efficient and accurate processing of swaps for clearing. All DCOs are also required to coordinate with each clearing member to establish systems that enable the clearing member or the DCO, acting for the clearing member, to accept or reject trades submitted for clearing as quickly as would be technologically practicable if fully automated systems were used. In addition, the CFTC points out that, to accomplish the goal of the Dodd-Frank Act in promoting central clearing, it is imposing final rules to minimize time lag between execution of trades and submission for clearing; therefore, a DCO must have rules to accept or reject for clearing, as quickly as would be technologically practicable if fully automated systems were used, all contracts that are listed for clearing or that are submitted for clearing. Further, while the DCO may screen trades against applicable product and credit risk criteria before accepting or rejecting trades, if a trade satisfies the applicable criteria, the DCO must accept it for clearing. CLEARING MEMBER RISK MANAGEMENT The CFTC states that it is imposing rules on the clearing members to enforce certain risk management practices in order to reduce the potential systemic risk of central clearing. These risk management rules apply to FCMs, SDs and MSPs that are also clearing members of a DCO. The clearing members must: establish certain risk-based credit and market limits for their trades, and for FCMs, also for the trades of their customers; establish and design control systems to screen orders and trades for compliance with the risk-based limits; monitor the trades for compliance to the risk-based limits on an intra-day and overnight bases; www.debevoise.com Page 3

design and conduct weekly stress tests under extreme but plausible conditions of all of their positions, and for FCMs, also for all positions in their customers accounts that would pose material risk to such FCMs; evaluate their ability to meet initial and variation margin requirements on at least a weekly basis; estimate their ability to liquidate, and the costs of liquidating, in an orderly manner, all of their positions, and for FCMs, also for all of their customers positions, on a quarterly basis; and test the credit lines available to them at least once a year. To enforce these risk management practices, the clearing members must establish written procedures to comply with the risk management rules and keep full, complete and systematic records documenting such compliance. All such records must be made available to the representatives of the CFTC or other prudential regulators upon request. In the accompanying Release, in response to the comments that these risk management rules are too vague, the CFTC states that the rules are intentionally drafted in a non-prescriptive way, which should permit each clearing member to design the limits, tests and other procedures in a way that is appropriate to its business model and customer base. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE RULES WITH RESPECT TO THE REGULATED ENTITIES Generally, these rules will become effective on October 1, 2012, but the CFTC acknowledges that the actual application of these rules to SDs, MSPs and SEFs is not possible without finalization of the entity definition rulemaking for such entities. However, the CFTC urges entities currently expected to become SDs, MSPs and SEFs to start developing systems and procedures to comply with the rules. The CFTC goes on to clarify in the Release that the rules are effective for FCMs, DCMs and DCOs on October 1, 2012. However, the rules will be www.debevoise.com Page 4

effective for the SDs and MSPs on the later of October 1, 2012 and the effective date for the registration rules applicable to SDs and MSPs, and they will be effective for SEFs on the later of October 1, 2012 and the effective date of the rules implementing core principles for SEFs. Please feel free to contact us with any questions. * * * Byungkwon Lim +1 212 909 6571 blim@debevoise.com Emilie T. Hsu +1 212 909 6884 ehsu@debevoise.com www.debevoise.com Page 5