Teachers and State Employees Retirement Systems of North Carolina

Similar documents
Teachers and State Employees Retirement System Actuarially Determined Employer Contributions (ADEC) Projections for the State System

Local Governmental Employees Retirement System Actuarially Determined Employer Contributions (ADEC) Projections for the Local System

Teachers and State Employees Retirement System Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2016

Teachers and State Employees Retirement System Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2017

Local Governmental Employees Retirement System Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2017

Discussion and Analysis of Proposed Election Assumption Conduent Human Resource Services

Decisions on Teachers and State Employees Retirement System (TSERS)

June 30, Full Actuarial Cost Factors. Dear Mr. Watts:

North Carolina Local Governmental Employees Retirement System. Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2015

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2016

National Guard Pension Fund Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2014

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2015

NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL GUARD PENSION FUND Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2012

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund. Report on the Annual Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2014

Legislative Retirement System of North Carolina. Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2015

North Carolina Local Governmental Employees Retirement System Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund Report on the Annual Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

North Carolina Local Governmental Employees Retirement System. Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2014

June 30, Additional Factors. Dear Mr. Watts:

February 11, Mr. Tom Mann Executive Director Kansas City Public School Retirement System 4600 The Paseo Kansas City, MO 64110

North Carolina Firefighters and Rescue Squad Workers Pension Fund Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

Consolidated Judicial Retirement System of North Carolina Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

Decisions on Teachers and State Employees Retirement System (TSERS)

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2017

Disability Income Plan of North Carolina Principal Actuarial Valuation Results as of December 31, 2017

Larry Langer, FCA, ASA, EA, MAAA Principal, Consulting Actuary. 9204/C7218RET01-NCTR-2011Conf-Impact-Lowering-Assumptions.pptx

Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund

Conduent Human Resource Services. Employes Retirement System of the City of Milwaukee Actuarial Valuation Report

February 13, Board Members:

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System

Housing Trust Fund Corporation GASB 45 Valuation for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

Teachers and State Employees Retirement Systems of North Carolina

Conduent Human Resource Services. City of Milwaukee Policemen s Annuity and Benefit Fund Actuarial Valuation Report

The City of St. Petersburg Police Officers Retirement System

Larry Langer, ASA, FCA, EA, MAAA Jonathan Craven, ASA, FCA, EA, MAAA

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

C I T Y O F O R L A N D O G E N E R A L E M P L O Y E E S P E N S I O N F U N D C H A P T E R , F. S. C O M P L I A N C E R E P O R T S E

Employer Contribution Rate Stabilization Policy (ECRSP) for Local Governmental Employees Retirement System (LGERS) January 31, 2019

Re: City of Sarasota General Employees Pension Fund Lower Investment Return to 6.9%

City of Orlando General Employees Pension Fund Chapter , F.S. Compliance Report September 30, 2017

As requested, enclosed is our Actuarial Analysis of HB 1352 for the Arkansas Judicial Retirement System.

Discussion of Valuation Results

As requested, enclosed is our Actuarial Analysis of HB 1256 for the Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System.

Measuring Risk in Public Pension Plans

El Paso County Retirement Plan

Arapahoe County Retirement Plan

Decisions on Local Governmental Employees Retirement System (LGERS)

Re: Actuarial Impact Statement for City of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan Pension Reform

Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System. Prepared as of June 30, 2014

Special Study to Provide Adopted Retirement Benefits for County General Tier 4 and County Safety Tier 4 Employees. Copyright 2012

Employes Retirement System of the City of Milwaukee

C I T Y O F O R L A N D O G E N E R A L E M P L O Y E E S P E N S I O N F U N D C H A P T E R , F. S. C O M P L I A N C E R E P O R T S E

City of Pittsburgh Retirement Systems. Special Study on the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System s Integration of Administrative Services

Fire and Police Pension Fund, San Antonio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2017

C H A P T E R , F. S. C O M P L I A N C E R E P O R T S E P T E M B E R 3 0,

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. The Prison Officers Pension Fund of New Jersey

Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund

The Town of Middletown Pension Plan

ST. PAUL TEACHERS RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION A CTUARIAL V ALUATION

Table A City Contribution Rate Impact of the New Plan:

Local 25 S.E.I.U. and Participating Employers Pension Plan Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of October 1, 2014 under IRC Section 432

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of June 30, 2009

City of San José Federated City Employees Retirement System

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. The Consolidated Police and Firemen s Pension Fund of New Jersey

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of January 1, 2014 under IRC Section 432

Ohio Police & Fire. Pension Fund. Investigation of Demographic and Economic Experience. Conduent Human Resource Services. Five-Year Period from

Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund

Actuary Hour Session I The Role of the Actuary

The Water and Power Employees Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles

Impact of DC Choice Plan on UCRP s Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability and Normal Cost

Public Employees Retirement System of New Jersey

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. The Consolidated Police and Firemen s Pension Fund of New Jersey Annual Report of the Actuary

Kent County Levy Court. Actuarial Valuation of the Kent County Retiree Benefits Program As of January 1, March 16, 2009

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. The Consolidated Police and Firemen s Pension Fund of New Jersey Annual Report of the Actuary

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of January 1, 2015 under IRC Section 432

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of Other Postemployment Benefits of the Virginia Retirement System

THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. The Consolidated Police and Firemen s Pension Fund of New Jersey Annual Report of the Actuary

Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands

City of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation and Review as of October 1, 2016

Re: BR 427 SB 1 AA Statement 1 of 4 KERS Hazardous, CERS Hazardous, and SPRS Retirement Systems

Proposed New Tiers of Benefit for New Entrants Based on Proposals from the City (Pension Plan and Retiree Medical Plan) Copyright 2011

Minnesota Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement

MINUTES BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

City of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan

C H A P T E R , F. S. C O M P L I A N C E R E P O R T S E P T E M B E R 3 0,

Employees' Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth Revised Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2014

GASB STATEMENT NO. 75 REPORT FOR THE VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSTEM

University Of California Retiree Health Benefit Program. Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2009

City of Ann Arbor Retiree Health Care Benefits Plan

Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. The State Police Retirement System of New Jersey Annual Report of the Actuary

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Public Employees Retirement Association of Colorado

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. The Police and Firemen s Retirement System of New Jersey

St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2017

The Water and Power Employees Retirement, Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan

Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota

Transcription:

January 26, 2017 Teachers and State Employees Retirement Systems of North Carolina Employer Contribution Projections Conduent Human Resource Services

Projections: Employer Contribution Rate and Funded Status Projections of employer contribution rates and funded status into the future can be helpful planning tools for stakeholders. Projections of the actuarial valuation are known as deterministic projections. Deterministic projections are based on one scenario in the future. Baseline deterministic projection is based on: December 31, 2015 valuation results December 31, 2015 valuation assumptions and methods to project future valuation results, including Valuation interest rate of 7.25% for all years Investment return of 7.25% on market value of assets The contribution rate under the Employer Contribution Rate Stabilization Policy is contributed until fiscal year ending 2022. The actuarially determined employer contribution (ADEC) is contributed for fiscal years ending 2023 and beyond. 0% increase in total active member population No cost-of-living adjustments granted Future pay increases based on long-term salary increase assumptions Alternate deterministic projection based on the same assumptions as the baseline deterministic projection, except Assumes 6.00% asset return for calendar year 2016 1 1

Employer Contribution Rate Stabilization Policy (ECRSP) The ECRSP was adopted by the Board of Trustees on January 21, 2016. The ECRSP sets recommended employer contributions equal to 0.35% of payroll greater than the appropriated contribution during the prior year, with the following bounds: Contributions may not be less than the actuarially determined employer contribution (ADEC); and Contributions may not be greater than the contribution determined using the same assumptions used to calculated the ADEC but using a discount rate equal to the 30-year Treasury Rate as of the valuation date. 2 2

Employer Contribution Rates Projections: Employer Contribution Rates 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 9.15% 9.98% 10.93% 11.78% 10.33% 10.79% 11.45% 12.65% 13.40% 13.27% 12.16% 12.77% 12.51% Under both projection scenarios, the ADEC is projected to be greater than the prior year s appropriation plus 0.35% for all years through fiscal year ending 2022; therefore, the projected employer contribution rates shown on this graph are equal to the projected ADEC for all years. 11.01% 10.58% 9.65% 9.41% 9.32% 9.31% 10.28% 9.88% 8.98% 8.76% 8.70% 8.71% 7.33% 6.76% 6.58% 6.13% 5.83% 5.54% 5.09% 4.93% 2% 0% Baseline Projection (7.25% 2016 Return) Fiscal Year Ending Alternate Projection (6.00% 2016 Return) Estimated returns were 1.25% lower than expected. As a result, we are projecting that the unfunded accrued liability will be higher resulting in higher contributions. 3

Funded Ratio Projections: Funded Ratio 104% 102% 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 92.5% 91.8% 91.6% 91.3% 90.8% 90.8% 90.6% 90.1% 89.7% 91.7% 90.6% 92.9% 91.9% 94.3% 93.3% 95.4% 94.6% 96.3% 95.6% 97.2% 96.6% 97.9% 97.4% 98.7% 98.3% 99.4% 99.1% 100.0% 99.8% Estimated returns were 1.25% lower than expected. As a result, we are projecting that the unfunded accrued liability will be higher resulting in a lower funded ratio. 100.4% 100.3% 84% 82% December 31st Valuation Date Baseline Projection (7.25% 2016 Return) Alternate Projection (6.00% 2016 Return) 4

Certification These results were prepared under the direction of Larry Langer and Michael Ribble who meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinions contained herein. These results have been prepared in accordance with all applicable Actuarial Standards of Practice, and we are available to answer questions about them. Future actuarial measurements may differ significantly from current measurements due to plan experience differing from that anticipated by the economic and demographic assumptions, increases or decreases expected as part of the natural operation of the methodology used for these measurements, and changes in plan provisions or applicable law. Except where otherwise indicated, an analysis of the potential range of such future differences is beyond the scope of this report. Larry Langer, FCA, ASA, EA, MAAA Principal, Consulting Actuary Michael Ribble, FSA, EA, MAAA Principal, Consulting Actuary 5

Questions? THANK YOU 6

2016 Conduent Business Service, LLC. All rights reserved. Conduent and Conduent Agile Star are trademarks of Conduent Business Services, LLC in the United States and/or other countries.